Database Develop

Nexus 4 : Antutu Benchmark on Android 4.3

Ok guys, I wanted just to share this video, showing results on AnTutu benchmark on Google Nexus 4 running stock 4.3.
It's not mine, but sorry for bad camera and sound
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMUOIiBkSPM

theres a benchmark thread for this kind of stuff http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1967843

TheRazr said:
Ok guys, I wanted just to share this video, showing results on AnTutu benchmark on Google Nexus 4 running stock 4.3.
It's not mine, but sorry for bad camera and sound
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMUOIiBkSPM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Optimus G would score over 17,500 on 4.1.2, unlocked, non-rooted. I've read somewhere that Google hasn't calibrated the N4 right. The screen, for example, is the same IPS+ (4.7 inches, 768 x 1280) that's used on the Optimus G, yet the Optimus G produces a better output owing to a better calibration. I've used the Optimus G, so I can say for certain it's got a better display than the N4. But, benchmarks don't mean much. The OS is very smooth, I've experienced no lag whatsoever, and that's all that matters to me.

How is this score special? my (stock, rooted) N4 scores the same on current 4.2.2

The Optimus G does indeed have a nicer screen yet a far more bloated UI (Ram would be running at 1gb with no apps running compared to about 500mb with tons running on my N4)
Owned both, like parts of both!

kalo88 said:
The Optimus G does indeed have a nicer screen yet a far more bloated UI (Ram would be running at 1gb with no apps running compared to about 500mb with tons running on my N4)
Owned both, like parts of both!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still, it ran pretty smoothly, aside from the occasional, minor hiccup. But I do agree with you on RAM usage. I've got the same applications installed on my N4, and I've got a good 1.5 gigs free.

matus201 said:
How is this score special? my (stock, rooted) N4 scores the same on current 4.2.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly my best score on rooted stock 4.2.2 was over 17900.

I got 24351 (antutu) with Franco Kernel , Performance Governor , Overclocked to 1.7 Ghz , Increased the thermal throttle threshold to 90 C for the duration of the test , closed all apps.
With a decent GPU overclock , some more CPU overclock , couple of i/o tweaks from me , i'm pretty sure i would get something close to 27000-28000.
Which is actually more than Galaxy S4's scores.
It overheats though , you wouldn't wanna use it like that all the time.

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1967843
sent from xda premium app

Where are the Note 4 benchmarks?

Are any in depth Galaxy Note 4 benchmarks. We all saw early benchmarks on GSM Arena, but I haven't found any Antutu, Geekbench, or Quadrant scores, to name a few. I know that benchmarks aren't everything, but as a Note 3 owner I'm excited to see performance enhancements brought to us by the Snapdragon 805 with the Adreno 420.

CorruptionDee said:
Are any in depth Galaxy Note 4 benchmarks. We all saw early benchmarks on GSM Arena, but I haven't found any Antutu, Geekbench, or Quadrant scores, to name a few. I know that benchmarks aren't everything, but as a Note 3 owner I'm excited to see performance enhancements brought to us by the Snapdragon 805 with the Adreno 420.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better to wait for the actual reviews, as benchmarks and performance can still be tweaked for the final software version.

Knowing Samsung the first firmware might be a bit laggy. I remember worrying about Note 10.1 because in reviews it was slow as hell - first update fixed all that.

That makes sense. The Korean model will be released relatively soon, so I expect some more info. I'm almost certain that the software the showroom floor was fully optimized.
As for the Note 10.1 2014, I still have mine and can confirm that it has gotten better with every update. I'm running Hyperdrive, and it runs as smooth as butter. The benchmarks reflect that as well, with numbers only slightly lower than my Note 3.

[Q] mi3 tegra vs snapdragon

I have both the tegra and snapdragon version of mi3.I can keep only one. Which one should I keep. I don't care about 3G. The only thing I care about is which one is faster and better in terms of performance. Thanks.

Android_user11 said:
I have both the tegra and snapdragon version of mi3.I can keep only one. Which one should I keep. I don't care about 3G. The only thing I care about is which one is faster and better in terms of performance. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as far as i know the td version is only for china,
and snapdragon is for the rest of the countries,
regarding speed and performance,snapdragon is a beast its to fast,snappier and gives an awesome performance
and once the kernel sources are released you can expect a hell lot of stable custom roms and kernels for the snapdragon variant,

I know tegra is for China. I got them both from China. I installed international stable rom on both. They are same in all aspects other than processor.
You are saying that snapdragon version will be faster?(I thought the tegra would be faster)

Android_user11 said:
I know tegra is for China. I got them both from China. I installed international stable rom on both. They are same in all aspects other than processor.
You are saying that snapdragon version will be faster?(I thought the tegra would be faster)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i feel snap is faster then tegra,but you have the devices you can compare the speeds better right ,
and i guess you are running miui roms,
well i was saying about other roms like aosp aisp carbon cm11 they are hell lot faster then the miui rom,so if you go for the snapdragon one,you can have all these roms ,
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-800-vs-Nvidia-Tegra-4
this might help you out in your decision

ZenR2 said:
i feel snap is faster then tegra,but you have the devices you can compare the speeds better right ,
and i guess you are running miui roms,
well i was saying about other roms like aosp aisp carbon cm11 they are hell lot faster then the miui rom,so if you go for the snapdragon one,you can have all these roms ,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right. More roms and kernels will be available for snapdragon version and since I will root my phone, snapdragon would probably be better. Can you please provide a benchmark so that I can convince myself that they are almost equal in terms of performance?

Android_user11 said:
You're right. More roms and kernels will be available for snapdragon version and since I will root my phone, snapdragon would probably be better. Can you please provide a benchmark so that I can convince myself that they are almost equal in terms of performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i cant tell you about tegras benchmark,but snap gave me antu benchmark of 37-40,000 score sometimes even more say 42

Anyone here has tried benchmarking tegra 4 phones?

Android_user11 said:
Anyone here has tried benchmarking tegra 4 phones?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you have the phone, right?

Just keep the snapdragon version, all around better and there's lots of development for the snapdragon version, plus one day you might need 3g, you'll be stuck on edge with the tegra.
Sent from my MI 3W

Thanks everyone. The reason I wasn't trying to benchmark the phones was that I wasn't at home (no WiFi) and since tegra version doesn't have 3g I couldn't download antutu. Yesterday I ran antutu on them both. Snapdragon got 41000(40991 to be precise) and tegra got 36000.I am keeping snapdragon version.
Thanks again.Btw sometimes the back bottom and home buttons light don't work properly (turn off after some time). Is this hardware issue or what. I don't really have any problem. I just turn them all of from settings. just wanted to know if anyone knows how to fix this. the menu bottom lights work fine .

PcMark: Note 3:Lollipop vs Note 4

(PcMark for android)
PCMark for Android introduces a fresh approach to benchmarking smart phones and tablets. It measures the performance and battery life of the device as a complete unit rather than a set of isolated components. And its tests are based on common, everyday tasks instead of abstract algorithms.
Finally, a benchmark application confirms what I have been saying for the past 3 months.......
Note3 (N900 Exynos: android 5.0) out-performs my Note 4 (Exynos: android 4.4.4)
Can you test and post your scores with Note 4 ( android 5.0.1 lollipop ) ?
Highest Scores so far (stock devices) ….
------------------------v1.2--------------------------------
Note 4, N910C Exynos, Lollipop: 5455
-------------------------v1.0--------------------------------
N900 [ Note3, Exynos, Lollipop]: 5216
N910C [ Note4, Exynos, Lollipop]: 4942
N910F [ Note4, SD805, Lollipop]: 4419
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks

fixfox2 said:
Finally,
(PcMark for android) a benchmark application confirms what I have been saying for the past 3 months.......
Note3 (N900 Exynos: android 5.0) out-performs my Note 4 (Exynos: android 4.4.4)
Can you test and post your scores with Note 4 ( android 5.0.1 lollipop ) ?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4808 on Work Performance... note that i'm facing some problems with bad GPU performance with my device on Lollipop, in KitKat it was better (just in GPU)

willowpc said:
4808 on Work Performance... note that i'm facing some problems with bad GPU performance with my device on Lollipop, in KitKat it was better (just in GPU)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Note 3 (N900, Exynos)
Work Performance: 5097

4901.. I'm having bad results at video playback .. so, as I have said.. the problem with the bad optimization of the GPU on Lollipop is affecting the overall result.. I think with the next update the results will increase..
Sent from my SM-N910C using XDA Free mobile app

willowpc said:
4901.. I'm having bad results at video playback .. so, as I have said.. the problem with the bad optimization of the GPU on Lollipop is affecting the overall result.. I think with the next update the results will increase..
Sent from my SM-N910C using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you still getting 7500 or something on antutu 3d? If yes can you do gfxbench too?

Note N910h android 4.4.4 kitkat

Note3 N900 Exynos android 5.0

Love your Note 3.
Wait for the Note 5
Skip the Note 4.
The rest of us will just have to make do.
Sent from my HUAWEI P7-L10 using XDA Premium HD app

Note 4 snapdragon n910f on lollipop. That's even done in the freezer

OK better. I guess I had power saving on.

Please post N910c scores (esp. those running lollipop).....
thanks

N910C lollipop 4544

Downloading test now, how long will it take?
FabiolusLMP

SM 910C
FabiolusLMP

N910c too...
Sent from my SM-N910C using XDA Free mobile app

All I know is no more non home made soc for me with Samsung. They seem to be wining the chip war like they did with the gs2 and gs3

SM-N910C Lollipop. Room temp: ~20°C

I figured out the low video score is because of using experimental player in developer options

So, without the experimental video player, i had a similar result. Looks like that in the best scenario we can get 5000 points...
4942 points...

so far, no Note4 has managed to cross the 5000 mark, let alone beat the Note3 score of 5097.
Interesting !!

Mi9 global extremely low geekbench scores?

Hi, i just got the device 2 days ago, i was on other firmware, and i had the same issue.
I updated to the 10.2.30, but nothing changed here are the scores,
Now before you tell me benchmark don't matter, i know, but im affraid cores may not boost during real life workloads and im getting crippled snapdragon 660 instead of s855, thank.
P.S. The phone is also not faster and even slower compared to s10 exynos in tasks, this is what made me investigate.

You sure you see those numbers reflected in daily tasks? I was curious if I'd get similar results and I did in geekbench but other benchmark apps give the result we'd expect so I'm pretty sure it's just the app that's at fault.

No, not completely but the phone is not faster and even slower compared to supposedly slower 9820 based s10...sometimes chrome starts to load web woth 2 seconds delay, and apps install time is also a bit sluggish

Well when my mi 9 came in I still had the oneplus 7 pro that I wanted to return so I compared them speed wise. Could barely tell that the mi 9 was slower than the 7 pro in download+install, most of the time it was almost the same if not the same and that's down to ufs 3.0 i guess. And believe me, I'm not boasting about my mi 9, because being fast is this phones's only quality, everything else is average at best in my opinion.

Can you do geekbench and pc mark work 2.0 for me please? just let few mins between runs and close everything from the background first, thanks alot!
P.S. What FW you are using? 64 or 128GB version?

You are using geekbench 5, use geekbench 4 if you want higher score.... Nice placebo just from a score.

Gokh said:
You are using geekbench 5, use geekbench 4 if you want higher score.... Nice placebo just from a score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not placebo, i have used geekbench because the phone was sluggish, read the OP. Can you do geekbench 5 please?

I got the same results as you, a bit lower tho

dazed1 said:
Hi, i just got the device 2 days ago, i was on other firmware, and i had the same issue.
I updated to the 10.2.30, but nothing changed here are the scores,
Now before you tell me benchmark don't matter, i know, but im affraid cores may not boost during real life workloads and im getting crippled snapdragon 660 instead of s855, thank.
P.S. The phone is also not faster and even slower compared to s10 exynos in tasks, this is what made me investigate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, you have a serious issue, here is mine from yesterday.

redmyth79 said:
Dude, you have a serious issue, here is mine from yesterday.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Btw that is on a global EU ROM 10.2.28.0
---------- Post added at 04:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:07 AM ----------
kingbasescu said:
Well when my mi 9 came in I still had the oneplus 7 pro that I wanted to return so I compared them speed wise. Could barely tell that the mi 9 was slower than the 7 pro in download+install, most of the time it was almost the same if not the same and that's down to ufs 3.0 i guess. And believe me, I'm not boasting about my mi 9, because being fast is this phones's only quality, everything else is average at best in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Average, actually it takes better photos and video over the OnePlus 7 pro!
To back that up look no further then the 50 plus reviews on YouTube!
Also the Mi 9 has better ultra wide and telephoto cameras.
Has wireless 20watt charging like no other does which the OnePlus has no wireless at all!
Charges faster, 1hr flat, last longer,
IR blaster although nothing major still nice to have. I use it. Especially at sports bars when you want your game! Lol
The only thing the OnePlus 7 pro truly beats the Mi 9 at is the display. Other then that the fact is the Mi 9 is even faster! Proven.
The 3.0 is only for data transfer out a USB C cable. Not to important to me overall!
---------- Post added at 04:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:23 AM ----------
dazed1 said:
Hi, i just got the device 2 days ago, i was on other firmware, and i had the same issue.
I updated to the 10.2.30, but nothing changed here are the scores,
Now before you tell me benchmark don't matter, i know, but im affraid cores may not boost during real life workloads and im getting crippled snapdragon 660 instead of s855, thank.
P.S. The phone is also not faster and even slower compared to s10 exynos in tasks, this is what made me investigate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad I will due a geekbench 5 tomorrow but geekbench is not really that good. If you want the best run the new AnTuTu 8 . Whatever to see what your getting as that test memory, CPU, GPU, and UX. Try that but the Mi 9 should do better then just about anything but a gaming phone!

dazed1 said:
Hi, i just got the device 2 days ago, i was on other firmware, and i had the same issue.
I updated to the 10.2.30, but nothing changed here are the scores,
Now before you tell me benchmark don't matter, i know, but im affraid cores may not boost during real life workloads and im getting crippled snapdragon 660 instead of s855, thank.
P.S. The phone is also not faster and even slower compared to s10 exynos in tasks, this is what made me investigate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My 1st result running warm and worth 5 apps loaded I will post below and more tomorrow. But it beats every registered score they have for Android and by a decent bit and that's with apps running and warm!!

Gokh is right, they changed the score multiplier in geekbench 5 it seems, it's easy to tell if you look at other phones' score, they're all in the same league.
I did the geekbench 5 on 10.2.28 EEA, 128 GB and got a similar result, a bit lower. I don't know what pcmark work 2.0 is, I typically just use antutu as it tests many things without going through the hassle of installing 6 other apps and is maintained properly.

kingbasescu said:
Gokh is right, they changed the score multiplier in geekbench 5 it seems, it's easy to tell if you look at other phones' score, they're all in the same league.
I did the geekbench 5 on 10.2.28 EEA, 128 GB and got a similar result, a bit lower. I don't know what pcmark work 2.0 is, I typically just use antutu as it tests many things without going through the hassle of installing 6 other apps and is maintained properly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is very easy to start to imagine things that is not true based on a misinterpreted performance score!

Mi 9 is definitely faster then S10 exynos in use.