Ultimate Kernel Closed and OpenSource - Galaxy Note 4 General

The best kernel (for me) will not recieve support. Awesome and totally custom kernel stopped on the version v62. The developer (mcaserg) bought meizu pro 5 and sold note 4. He left us a source of kernel with ramdisks.
Ultimate Kernel sources on Mod edit links removed
All Ultimate Kernel versions on Mod edit links removed

Thanks for pointing out. I'm using ultimate kernel and i think its still the best one yet.

The best kernel for Note 4!

Btw, i still haven't found why ultimate kernel is banned from XDA. Any clue?

Sectoras said:
Btw, i still haven't found why ultimate kernel is banned from XDA. Any clue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it was close-sourced previously

SM-N910F?

Anyone pls pm me the direct link to download Ultimate kernel v62
Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

daneal2u said:
it was close-sourced previously
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So closed-source kernels are prohibited from XDA?
Would be that fair for someone who devoted a long time to develop and share his own kernel?

What is the different of two versions. Does anyone have a clue..??
Ultimate_Kernel_v.62_TW_5.1.1_Old_Wolfson.zip
Ultimate_Kernel_v.62_TW_5.1.1_Stock_Sound.zip

mjrifath said:
What is the different of two versions. Does anyone have a clue..??
Ultimate_Kernel_v.62_TW_5.1.1_Old_Wolfson.zip
Ultimate_Kernel_v.62_TW_5.1.1_Stock_Sound.zip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sound in old wolfson much better than in stock but speaker during calls doesn't work.
Upd. Speaker on the back side of note 4.

mjrifath said:
Anyone pls pm me the direct link to download Ultimate kernel v62
Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does anyone need to?
Learn to read the main post.

Sectoras said:
So closed-source kernels are prohibited from XDA?
Would be that fair for someone who devoted a long time to develop and share his own kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is illegal according to the law and open-source licenses. Pretty sure none of the manufacturers would like to release their source-code, but they have to according to the license agreements.

Related

[General] [Q&A] Cyanogen Mod 9 Beta 4 For GT-S5570 : For all your questions.

Hello galaxy mini users,
Thankfully, Maclaw and his team are considering their development of Galaxy ICS for Galaxy Mini too and as a result we will soon get Beta 4 of latest ICS based CM9 custom rom.
You can find detailed info at this thread :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1539642
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I created this thread so that all users can express their happiness and share their joy with others. Want to say thanks, or ask questions, then please post there.
Help Keep the Development thread clean so that it will be easier for everyone to find latest information and hear latest news from the developers.
Cheers!
Placeholder!
Finally we are going to get beta 4 form Maclaw with majors fixes like camera and deep sleep.thanks Maclaw in advance.
Excited
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
tnx
tnx for this thread!>;]
I'm wondering when will USB Tethering, Wifi Hotspot & USB storage mounting be merged into CM9...
eksdiey said:
tnx for this thread!>;]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mention not...
Lion_Heart9x said:
I'm wondering when will USB Tethering, Wifi Hotspot & USB storage mounting be merged into CM9...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry... I am foreseeing it being already fixed. It's just a matter of some time.
Radio
is not mentioned even radio
but i don't care
thanks maclaw
I've read about this beta 4 on its original thread, and looks like everything is really works.
but where's the download link?
Really eager to try it.
So, as i understand - games performance in ICS will be same as in Gingerbread?
Sent from my piece of **** using Tapatalk.
I don't think it has been uploaded yet. Really excited though.
kernel 3.0
Hi,
I wanted to know from the developers wether this is based on kernel 2.6.x or on kernel 3.x
I ask this beacuse I'm aware that it is not possible to compile the linux 3.x kernel for the armv6 architecture, but googling around I found that a patch has been created for the raspberry pi motherboard (which too integrates an armv6-compatible processor)
Here are some links:
SORRY BUT I CAN'T PUT EXTERNAL LINKS YET
(just google "Linux Kernel 3.1.9 for Raspberry Pi Released & Build Instructions")
Allright, the android kernel is highly customised, though, who knows, maybe this could help us galaxy mini users too!!
Maclaw is going to upload Beta4 today. Hope to use a stable Cm9.
Sorry, my English is not good
Please redirect to this thread.
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1541074
No point on having two of the same topic
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

[Q] Benefits of a possible 3.0 ICS/CM9 Kernel

So Guys,
on many places has been mentioned that there is/will be some devs who take a look on a possible future 3.0 Kernel for our tabs with ICS/CM9. As I am an "experienced noob" (my special word for "power-user ;-)) and not a dev, please could somebody enlighten me what benefits such a 3.0 Kernel would bring us? Performance? Features?
Thanks for your answers...
If allowed in forum rules (dunno for shure) you can discuss related stuff in here as well from my side.
Which kernel are you referring to??
TheATHEiST said:
Which kernel are you referring to??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Afaik there is no such kernel yet, as I said, but some devs are working on (humberos?!)
spike1985 said:
Afaik there is no such kernel yet, as I said, but some devs are working on (humberos?!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So then why has it got a version number of 3.0? Which other kernel are you referring to if there has been a v1 & v1?
Or are you confused and referring to Android 4.0?
TheATHEiST said:
So then why has it got a version number of 3.0? Which other kernel are you referring to if there has been a v1 & v1?
Or are you confused and referring to Android 4.0?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not confused... go to your devices details and you will see what I mean in kernel version...
Yeah, like in Linux, kernel version was 2.4 on the old days, then 2.6
For last decade, then now 3.0.
In Linux the 3.0 includes some android codes I think.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA
spike1985 said:
So Guys,
on many places has been mentioned that there is/will be some devs who take a look on a possible future 3.0 Kernel for our tabs with ICS/CM9. As I am an "experienced noob" (my special word for "power-user ;-)) and not a dev, please could somebody enlighten me what benefits such a 3.0 Kernel would bring us? Performance? Features?
Thanks for your answers...
If allowed in forum rules (dunno for shure) you can discuss related stuff in here as well from my side.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this would directly affect us users (or as you say it "experienced noobs"). More likely affect kernel builders (efficiency and compatibilities). Please correct me if I was wrong.
first we need the leaked ICS rom from Samsung and then Samsung releases the kernel source code. No doubt this will be the version 3.0 of the kernel.
Kernel 3.0 brings many benefits to users because many optimizations are included
----
Google translate

[Cyano-Plus Project] Cyanogen Mod 10.x on GT-S5570I -- Pop Plus

CyAnO Plus Project
---Only on XDA---
Read before drawing conclusions!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you read that right! With the project cyano plus we will try to port the cyanogen mod 10 on our device (GT-S5570I).
As you may know many devices have hardware libraries updated to support the cyanogen mod, many, but our...... we have always said: Why the Galaxy Mini because galaxy mini has the cyanogen mod and we don't? Why the galaxy mini has a different chipset from our although the indirect predecessor of our device?
So, why port bring a cyanogen mod on our device? Impossible?? So why not create a rom that has the same motto of cyanogen mod: to be an alternative to the stock rom! For now, the project is limited to a stock-based rom: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2171934
but with your help we can go a long way....
So..
If you want to collaborate to make yourself available answer to the post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GOODLUCK!
I don't want hurt your heart & fingers.
But...
Wrong thread. Read XDA Rules, development thread is for RELEASED works, not discussion and any other type of that.
really looking forward to it! wish you luck in this project!
In fact need not porting. In fact need to build CM-10* for you device from source.
I build 4.2.2 for galaxy mini but this device have different board.
lol we even not hv a complete CM7
kissingmylove said:
lol we even not hv a complete CM7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In fact, the project is to run the various CM
Jeeko said:
In fact, the project is to run the various CM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u use stock,it just look like theming
The only way to get aosp is build fr source
I was using madteam CM7 but it has to much bugs. I hope that this project will be a success.
bogdan99999 said:
I was using madteam CM7 but it has to much bugs. I hope that this project will be a success.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope it too but without official driver from broadcom, it wont success
Galaxy Pop Plus'ımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi.
I would like to send them a mail to, but I don't exactly know how to formulate it. I mean, I can't send them e email like this " RELEASE THE DRIVER OR I WILL KILL YOU", I need to think to a "template".
bogdan99999 said:
I would like to send them a mail to, but I don't exactly know how to formulate it. I mean, I can't send them e email like this " RELEASE THE DRIVER OR I WILL KILL YOU", I need to think to a "template".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Given the situation would be right.But unfortunately you have to try to be as friendly as possible! :silly:
Jeeko said:
Given the situation would be right.But unfortunately you have to try to be as friendly as possible! :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And the email adress is ... .?
bogdan99999 said:
And the email adress is ... .?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2210580
Q:
If you use the driver from galaxy Y and a rom that has almost no bugs will work ?
Till now no stable cm7
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app

iodak kernel+Cyanogenmod kernel=Cyodak v11

Hello,
Due to heavy demand by a lot of users i give you
Iodak Kernel Updated with cm11 kernel.
What you get?
Cyodak!
Enjoy!
Source
https://github.com/Ntemis/LG_X3_P880_v20a
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is an Anykernel Version
Demetris said:
Hello,
Due to heavy demand by a lot of users and an individual that has the tendency to copy my work and hiding behind his finger i give you what he tries hard to hide
Iodak Kernel Updated with cm11 kernel.
What you get?
Cyodak!
Enjoy!
Source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cyodak?
It's too brutal cut.
My suggestion is Cyanodak.
The letter "o" connects both parts gently.
.
Anyway, in good taste would ask @iodak acceptance.
.
I don't understand. What are the benifits of this new Kernel version? If its better than official CM kernel, why don't you merge it directly?
ze7zez said:
Cyodak?
It's too brutal cut.
My suggestion is Cyanodak.
The letter "o" connects both parts gently.
.
Anyway, in good taste would ask @iodak acceptance.
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don’t need permission to use open source.
But i gave credits properly.
LeonardHofstadter said:
I don't understand. What are the benifits of this new Kernel version? If its better than official CM kernel, why don't you merge it directly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are some fundamental code changes that cant be in a mainline kernel.
And If not use them this kernel looses its essence.
Just what I've been looking for :victory:
@Demetris Working On Stock?
Becuase You Say This Is Anykernel.
Seems not because I got bootloop after installing on stock rom
Sent from my LG-P880 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
ze7zez said:
Cyodak?
It's too brutal cut.
My suggestion is Cyanodak.
The letter "o" connects both parts gently.
.
Anyway, in good taste would ask @iodak acceptance.
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree on Cyanodak. It sounds way more awesome!
Thanks for the Kernel. It's been while since we had an active kernel. I haven't tested it out yet, but I will very soon
Jansxel said:
@Demetris Working On Stock?
Becuase You Say This Is Anykernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesnt work on Zaiben 16, at least for me
I think this is only CM based roms not for stock ones maybe Demetris make one to work with stock based roms too
Sent from my LG-P880 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
What's new in this kernel?
any chance we get stock-based version of the kernel, since i suppose it has some issues with anykernel installation on stock? thanks
Iodak had a separate package for stock. I have to contact him for some help on the matter as I never messed up with stock kernel (I don't use stock ROMs)
soo im just gonna break the ice here , whoever created this; thank you. but can someone please tell me the whats different from iodaks v10?
i mean it works good but i was still wondering
Ok, I've read just about enough ridiculous bickering.
I'm gonna clean the thread of the useless OT, and quoted posts.
I will remind "ALL" members, if you have an issue with a post or thread, then please use the RP function to contact a Moderator. Posting arguments doesn't do anything but cause the Mod Team to come in and clean up.
"IF" you believe any "Kanging" is going on, then by all means contact Moderation with all the proof ready so the situation can be assessed. Don't just go smacking off stating "copy and paste" blah blah blah...... without any evidence to back it up. All that does is cause arguments and wastes Mods time.
Any more of this bickering, and infractions will ensue.....
Thank You
MD
@raviboy100
Is iodak kernel updated with upstream 3.4 kernel same thing i am trying to do with cm11.
@Moscow Desire
Can you please move this thread to
Optimus 4X HD Android Development
Thank you.
Demetris said:
Can you please move this thread to
Optimus 4X HD Android Development
Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done
MD
Demetris said:
I don’t need permission to use open source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I referred to the use of "odak" in the name, and not to use the source code.
.
ze7zez said:
I referred to the use of "odak" in the name, and not to use the source code.
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you want me to ask him if i can use odak in the name of the kernel?
What if i rename the kernel Cyodem?

Omnystal and Kernels In General

Hi all, I'm looking for the Omnystal Kernel and apparently the link for that kernel has been taken down on 4PDA. I'm just wondering if someone could upload and PM me with a download link.
Moving onto custom kernels in-general, we have a lot of discontinued and mostly unstable kernels. The least unstable of them all is AndroModX which was my goto before I realized it stripped 2 hours worth of SoT. I'm just wondering if someone could build us a stable custom kernel for our device, it would be much appreciated! Thank you for your time.
Sent from my X52X using Tapatalk
Soapy! said:
Hi all, I'm looking for the Omnystal Kernel and apparently the link for that kernel has been taken down on 4PDA. I'm just wondering if someone could upload and PM me with a download link.
Moving onto custom kernels in-general, we have a lot of discontinued and mostly unstable kernels. The least unstable of them all is AndroModX which was my goto before I realized it stripped 2 hours worth of SoT. I'm just wondering if someone could build us a stable custom kernel for our device, it would be much appreciated! Thank you for your time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Kernel Has All been taken down due to the previous give up due to some users.
Wait till Tomorrow. Im working on a new kernel
I will be publishing to xda
Soapy! said:
Hi all, I'm looking for the Omnystal Kernel and apparently the link for that kernel has been taken down on 4PDA. I'm just wondering if someone could upload and PM me with a download link.
Moving onto custom kernels in-general, we have a lot of discontinued and mostly unstable kernels. The least unstable of them all is AndroModX which was my goto before I realized it stripped 2 hours worth of SoT. I'm just wondering if someone could build us a stable custom kernel for our device, it would be much appreciated! Thank you for your time.
Sent from my X52X using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Were you wanting to use a custom kernel for stock or EUI, MIUI?
DarknessKiller said:
My Kernel Has All been taken down due to the previous give up due to some users.
Wait till Tomorrow. Im working on a new kernel
I will be publishing to xda
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your work!! [emoji2]
Sent from my X52X using Tapatalk
anonymous007 said:
Were you wanting to use a custom kernel for stock or EUI, MIUI?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Miui
Sent from my X52X using Tapatalk
Soapy! said:
Miui
Sent from my X52X using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah okay, yeah that's pretty much the only thing a custom kernel would be good for since most AOSP/ Lineage ROMs default kernel gives acceptable performance; which is part of the reason for lack of kernels but if Darkness Killer is bringing out a new one that'll help feel the void.
I was getting the reboot bug using MIUI and Omnystal Kernel did fix it when it was available but now I've been using ycjeson kernel when I use MIUI as it fixes the issue just as Omnystal did.
anonymous007 said:
Ah okay, yeah that's pretty much the only thing a custom kernel would be good for since most AOSP/ Lineage ROMs default kernel gives acceptable performance; which is part of the reason for lack of kernels but if Darkness Killer is bringing out a new one that'll help feel the void.
I was getting the reboot bug using MIUI and Omnystal Kernel did fix it when it was available but now I've been using ycjeson kernel when I use MIUI as it fixes the issue just as Omnystal did.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm for me i feel much better battery with my kernel and kinda kill my device if i use stock / miui rom even with my kernel
So pretty much my kernel are focus on custom rom
i am looking for a Kernel solve thermal throttling agressive in SD652
Clock speed goes 1.8ghz to 831mhz too easy.

Categories

Resources