Related
Hey all,
Looking to order the Moto X very soon, but I hate not having a screen protector on my phones - dust, sand, something in my pocket scratching the screen.
Don't see too many choices, especially from Amazon that would get here this week. I really would prefer a dry application
i-blason? Never heard of them, can't find much about them.
Skinomi is a wet install...
COD - Crazy on Digital? Never heard of them either
Any suggestions? I'd like to order from a place that would have it arrive this week with my phone. Verizon sells a generic one but usually theirs peel off soon after, rainbow/orange effect, or are cloudy.
Are screen protectors still necessary? Having had an original Droid, a Galaxy Nexus and now the Moto X, I haven't used a screen protector on any of them and haven't had any issues. Sure, the screens print easy but it's just as easy to wipe them clean. I'm also always skeptical of screen protectors messing with the touch screen sensitivity but I'm sure that's not an issue at this point.
Personal preference, I prefer to have them. Droid X, iPhone 4, Galaxy S3. I've seen too many posts on XDA and other forums (for different phones) where people wonder how/why their screen scratched in an empty pocket. Sand (harder than glass), dust, etc. Just piece of mind for me is all.
Halo. Look it up on Amazon
I got an invisibleshield today. The edges of the screen aren't quite covered.
Sent from my XT1058 using xda app-developers app
I've tried a number of screen protectors, including the much-acclaimed Spigen SGP / Steinheil protectors. I keep coming back to Boxwave. Made in Japan, and very nice. It feels good to the touch--not grippy like others I've used. I've used their anti-glare and anti-fingerprint protectors for two of my digital cameras, and I use their glossy crystal one for my Samsung Galaxy Nexus. It's a dry application, but to be certain that dust won't get underneath it, go into your bathroom, shut the door, turn on the shower to HOT, and let the room get a little bit (not excessively) steamy. Dust particles will bind to the steam and not float around in the air. You can then apply your screen protector without too much fuss.
Right now it looks like Boxwave doesn't have any screen protectors for the Moto X. I assume they'll probably get some in the near future. I e-mailed them, once, about getting the best size for my 3DS and they were very helpful in helping me to find one with the dimensions I needed (since they didn't have a 3DS protector, they recommended me one that was the closest size).
By the way, I don't know how the Moto X's Gorilla Glass compares to my Galaxy Nexus, but my Gnex did start to get micro-abrasions, which is why I got a screen protector. I guess tiny particles in my jeans pocket were wearing on it. There were no scratches visible by just looking, but there were spots on the screen that were starting to wear, making the underlying screen slightly blurry. I'm very happy to have a screen protector. It almost doesn't affect the clarity of my screen, at all.
Invisiblesheild does not reach the bezel, iblason takes some readjusting, (have tape on standby) the Skinomi so far has the best coverage but it has orange peel and collects dust like a lint roller. I'll keep it on until Halo, Boxwave, or Reallook get some out. I hate wet apply except Just Like Glass.
Sent from my XT1058 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
PET, TPU, or Tempered Glass – all you need to know to choose a screen protector
A bit of a disappointment in the past, today's screen protectors are easier to install, cheaper, and better than ever in every aspect. There are three varieties - PET film, TPU (polyreuthane), and our undisputed favorite - tempered glass. And then there are two methods to get them on your display – dry and wet. So here's more about how screen protectors work and what they offer.
PET Film
Obviously, PET doesn't stand for a dog or a cat. It means "polyethylene terephthalate" - a type of plastic that's available in many variations depending on specific applications. In the manufacturing industry, it's used for mundane stuff like liquid and food containers. But this doesn't mean that PET film protectors are glorified water bottle plastic. They consist of polyester film with a scratch resistant matte coating on one side and a silicone adhesive on the other. Quality ones are quite clear and add a functional anti-scratch layer to your screen, but have no impact protection. And their scratch-resistance isn't better than what Gorilla Glass already has - it's limited to fingernails, coins and keys. They are cheap, and usually come in packs of three or more. Their downside is that plastic is the easiest to discolor from sun rays and oil buildup from your fingers, and it doesn't feel as nice as glass does to the touch.
If you have a cheaper or older phone, or you're fine with the most basic and affordable screen protection, get a PET protector. The manufacturer doesn't really matter, but if you have a soft spot for a particular brand, there's no reason not to go with theirs. Chances are that protectors from established brands will be better cut-out for your device and won't leave loose edges that can catch on to your clothes and peel the protector away (it has happened before).
TPU
TPU (thermoplastic polyreuthane) is next in the screen protector food chain. This is chemically-enhanced plastic whose properties include scratch resistance, elasticity, oil and grease resistance, and increased toughness. Since the material is elastic, it has limited "self-healing" abilities. This means that its slight softness gives it the power to absorb non-extreme impact, such as most drops and lighter scratches, while retaining all or most of its original composition. For example, lighter scratches usually leave just a small dent in the soft plastic, which slowly returns to normal.
The "military-grade" tag most TPU protectors proudly carry is worthy of an explanation. One manufacturer says that this material is used "to protect jetfighters". And what do you know, it's true! Skim through this Aerospace Surface Protection brochure - it's full of polyreuthane protective tapes used for "aircraft and windmill leading edge protection". However, getting a TPU case or screen protector doesn't guarantee it's made of the same quality of material. But your smartphone also isn't a fighter jet, right?
If you are willing to pay a slightly higher price, a TPU protector is, logically, better choice than PET film. At the very least, it's going to provide better impact protection (although you shouldn't be pushing your chances). It's also nicer to the touch, although it isn't glass-smooth. Arguably, the best part is that you'll get to explain to your friends and acquaintances how your phone has "fighter jet protection". Pretty cool, huh?
Tempered glass
Protection with a temper! Tempered glass (TG) screen protectors are the absolute best you can buy. Material-wise, a high-quality TG protector is multi-layered, usually starting with shock absorbent silicon on the bottom layer, followed by PET film, and an optically clear adhesive to 'sandwich' the previous two layers with the next two, which are tempered glass and oleophobic coating. All of this scratch, oil, and shock protecting goodness is compressed into a <0.4mm-thick sheet that's no harder to apply than a PET or TPU protector, and none heavier or otherwise obnoxious.
A glass protector is superior to its alternatives in every way. It has better light transmittance, making for a clearer display. It's anti-reflective and glare reducing. It has oleophobic coating, which heavily reduces fingerprints. It has the smooth feel of actual glass under your fingertips. Unlike Gorilla Glass 3, it resists sand scratches, making it the only viable option for beachgoers. And let's talk about shock protection. T-glass protectors boast a material hardness rating of 8H to 9H, meaning they are hard enough to resist scratches from anything that's not topaz or corundum (extremely hard aluminum oxide). Yet, they aren't completely shatter-proof. Since this is toughened glass we're talking about, in the event of a fatal drop, the protector will absorb all the damage and break into tiny shards. Chances are pretty good that your display will end up unscathed underneath. Thus, instead of having to replace the entire screen, you'll only have to get a new protector. Which is easier on both your soul and your wallet.
As you probably expected, tempered glass protectors are the most expensive kind. Most renowned brands can charge up to $40 for their products. And although that's money well spent if you are rocking an expensive flagship smartphone, excellent tempered glass protectors can be found for less than $15 online.
Dry vs Wet Mount
There are two methods for installing a screen protector - dry and wet. The method is usually specified on the box.
The dry method keeps the protector glued to the screen with static electricity. There's no adhesive involved, and the application is very straightforward. In short, you're supposed to enter a dust-free environment (either outside, or in your humid bathroom, preferably naked to prevent dust specs from your clothes), clean your phone thoroughly, align the protector and apply it. After a few tries, you will end up with near-perfect results. You don't have only one shot at this. Most dry-application protectors will let you carefully lift them off the phone and take care of misalignment and dust particles before trying again. Some even come with an electrostatic paper band to help you get rid of annoying dust.
The wet application method works by spraying liquid on the underside of the screen protector. It's a convoluted and awkward ordeal. You're tasked with the very precise placement of a thin, wet sheet of plastic - quite frustrating, because the liquid adds weight and gets the protector folding and dancing in every direction but the right one. Allegedly, wet protectors are easier to place without forming air bubbles or trapping dust, and are more resistant to peeling. If you mess up the installation at first, they too give second chances at applying them correctly. But all the phone drying, protector re-moistening and getting rid of excess liquid between it and screen is quite the patience test.
Wrap-up
With so many options available, and at very fair prices, getting a screen protector for your device has become a no-brainer. PET film products are the best choice for basic screen protection. TPU protectors can be a bit rare, but they have the best ratio of affordability and toughness. Finally, Tempered Glass protectors offer the ultimate in protection and feel, but they are the priciest of the bunch. Still, even the most expensive ones make sense for flagship smartphones and tablets.
GUIDE PERFECT SCREEN PROTECTOR INSTALLATION BUBBLE FREE
CLICK HERE
HAVING SCREEN PROTECTOR ? USEFUL OR NOT ?
How important a screen protector is for you?
Matte or clear type screen protectors - choose your poison!
If you are planning to get a screen protector, the first question that a seller will pop up to you is do you want a matte or clear type of screen protectors. There is absolutely no difference between them both in terms of quality but what makes them very distinctive is the looks or outcome after installation. Matte type is great for those who hate to wipe off the finger prints and those oily stains on your screen. For the record, if you are touching your screen, there is absolutely no way to avoid the smooches. If you are going for the matte type, you can well kiss good bye to those clear and high resolutions displays (Retina Display for iPhone and Super Amoled Plus for Samsung for example). However, the positive side of matter type is of course, anti finger print ability.
Gorilla Glass - is it worth taking the chances?
I know this is one of the most common questions for most. Can I actually count on Gorilla Glass to protect my smartphone from scratches. Gorilla Glass is made to protect the phone from normal damages but always keep in mind that Gorilla Glass will ensure the phone is scratch resistance and not scratch proof. Scratches could happen over time and again, it boils down to your self preference if you want to risk it. If you are a safe handler, then you could be fine with this option.
Touch sensitivity issue with screen protectors - myth vs real
Some users complained that when they fix screen protector on their phones, they felt there is sensitivity loss. Users around the world might experience this regardless the quality of the screen protector in this case. Although it is very rare for the occurrence, it could happen and trust me on this as I experienced it myself. If you are using a matte type screen protector, there is a higher chance of this compared to a clear type. Also, the chance of this increases if you uses a cheap screen protector.
Where to Buy
Amazon
Ebay
Local stores
Sources
PHONEARENA
APPLE FORUM
Reserved
What about nano liquid screen protector
hrishi420 said:
What about nano liquid screen protector
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's also called hard shield and it's basically a spray that solidifies afterwards in about ten minutes. I personally have not used it . It's basically used for reduced smudges and finger prints with some protection but it has mixed customer opinion about it. The most common being uneven and taccy surface which might be due to uneven spray.
More information
http://www.taiwantrade.com.tw/EP/cl...637342/Hard-Shield_nanotech_Screen_Protector/
http://www.dynaflousa.com/product_info.php?products_id=146&osCsid=42vehcu9tbnsqan9gh39egfs26
http://www.prs-international.com/destra-shield-advantages.php
Where to buy
http://www.amazon.com/Hard-shield-Coating-Screen-Protector-Ereader/dp/B006G2J0U2
How many tempered glass screen protectors are currently available. I know there is Xgear and.....?
TheNerd:] said:
How many tempered glass screen protectors are currently available. I know there is Xgear and.....?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a thorough list of all tempered glass with their price and specification. Note they are for Samsung S4 but I'm sure Nexus' ought to be available as well. Scroll down the forum and you'll find video reviews as well.
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2260486
SMALL REVIEW FROM A USER
I have a tempered glass screen protector for my Note 3 and it fits and works perfectly. It's been on my phone for 2 months now. Not a single scratch to it and no peeling or dust accumulation at all. I would recommend one any time over a plastic protector. I got mine from a company called fasttech. They are very cheap compared to UK sellers and the company is very reliable even considering that they are Chinese.
AN OPINION FROM A USER
Tempered glass has an adhesive throughout the whole surface, not only the bezel/perimeter area.
The difference is very simple. If you want scratch protection, get a film screen protector, but make sure to get quality PET 3H hardness film like the one sold by iSmooth and Spigen. Cheap ebay stuff is thin, will scratch, will bubble after some time, and will have rainbow effect under the florescent light. If you want ultimate shatter protection - get tempered glass. On impact the glass will shatter without affecting your display. Spigen and Seidio makes some of the best ones. I'm personally a big fan of Seidio VITREO and been using it on my Note 2 for a very long time.
Well I have now had my Galaxy S 7 inch for about 2 weeks. I had a brief experience with the clearplex screen protector put on by Best Buy. It is a wedding store type of protection. It was okay however it was a fingerprint magnet and it seemed to scratch easily and on at least two occasions the installation done by Best Buy was not so great. I ended up returning it and getting my money back.
What I noticed is that one store where I purchased my phone from was selling a product called the crystal screen protector which is a coating that you apply to the surface of the glass that then bonds using nanotechnology to the screen it rates its protection as 9h hardness which is the same as glass screen protectors.
It states that this coating is good for one year. The beauty is that it is basically invisible and is so thin that any case that is used would have zero impact on it. In fact nobody with the naked eye would be aware that something is applied. If this in fact works as stated that is incredible. Is it does increase the surface hardness of our gorilla glass screens which is usually something on the order of five or six h hardness. The thing is I am always a skeptic in that sense. I can't really appreciate it being on the surface of the screen I wonder if it's all snake oil so to speak. I am wondering if anybody has any experience with this as I would think our phones are the perfect candidates for this given the amount of difficulty manufacturers have had in producing a tempered glass screen protector that it here as well to the phone and looks good at the same time.
Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk
Clearly I am drunk with bad autocorrect.
Title had nothing to do with Acer.
One example is Kristall
https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&sour...ggnMAI&usg=AFQjCNGr4IBe0q5TwUdJ9URPNsb1w3OJyg
Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk
Mixed reviews on the whole. I've always been intrigued but have never used myself. The biggest draw back to these is they offer no drop protection like traditional protectors do.
Sent from my SM-G935F using XDA-Developers mobile app
99% sure it's a sham
Considering the screen is already scratch resistant up to 7H, I doubt a coating like that would work. If it were that easy all manufacturers would do it because it's a selling point. You can have air coated sapphire like on the Huawei watch or Nexus 6P's camera, but that's expensive even though it works. I've had my Huawei watch since launch and despite the stainless steel being scratched to no end (316L SS isn't very scratch resistant) the display is perfect without a mark on it. If a company could find a way to offer that I would buy it, but it's very unlikely.
hello
all know that its hard to fined good TG or screen protector for redmi note 4-4x that's fit good with no gap or air in edge
so i need to know that if any use nano Liquid Protector for there device and any tips and info about that i will be rly grateful
No. Forget the idea. Liquid nano screen protectors are bull**** and huge scams. Believe me. Tempered glass is still your best choice and gives you the most protection even though there is a little gap at the side of the screen. Liquid protectors are fake. How is a little gel supposed to protect your phone by rubbing it on your screen creating a thin, oily layer? It can't. I did make a test though. Some pretty girls made a huge presentation and tried to sell me liquid protector. They even showed off by hitting the screen of an iPhone with a metallic object pretty hard that at least should have nicked the screen if not broken it into pieces. It was suspicious and I made a complete and throughout search. They use an iphone that comes with gorilla glass that almost unbreakable. No wonder why it didn't break. I bought a new Note 4X SD with 64 gb so I asked them to put the protector on my old phone, the 16 GB MTK and hit it with the metallic object just like they did to the iPhone. The silly girls did it and my phone screen broke completely. That's it. Never trust wonder protectors.
Actually liquid protectors will not make your screen shatter proof but will only add a layer of protection that will fade overtime around 2-3mos
Tried it on a couple of phones and more than once. The coating lasts about 3 days max.
I had one put on to my Galaxy Note 3 when they first arrived in the Philippines. One application (drop from a bottle) cost me $9 (a comparable tempered glass protector cost as little as $2). The bottle itself costs $16.
I noted where previous micro-scratches were before I applied the protector (one just above the G on the "SAMSUNG" logo.)
SIX DAYS after paying through the nose for that liquid stuff, another scratch appeared on the phone, this time near the menu button.
After that, I returned to using tempered glass protectors and never looked back.
I am using the screen protector that came with the phone but I am worried that it might not be that good to rely on.
I am not taking about dropping the phone or something. All am I caring about is scratches from the pen or stuff in my pocket. Can this screen protector help against these or it is useless?
The reason I kept it, because it fit so well and it does not affect the screen quality.
Obviously experience may vary quite a bit due to different conditions. For me so far the stock protector works quite well and protects the screen from scratches.
But as I like the "Glass feeling" a bit more I'll fit a tempered glass protector sometime in the future....
Agree. I will do the same. It is just not easy to find a glass protector that actually fits
Khalid Madkour said:
Agree. I will do the same. It is just not easy to find a glass protector that actually fits
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, both Amfilm and Whitestone have UV-based tempered glass protectors that fit really good, but do you want to spend the money for those?
They're not like $10 for 3 pieces or something
MasterThiefGarrett said:
Well, both Amfilm and Whitestone have UV-based tempered glass protectors that fit really good, but do you want to spend the money for those?
They're not like $10 for 3 pieces or something
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Spending 70~100 USD to protect 1200$ is worth it but the problem these kind of screen protectors can not be found in Egypt I think so until I find a way to get them without paying much taxes and fees I will stick with the default S.protector
I remember Samsung saying that a glass screen cover would interfere with the fingerprint scanner. I'm curious as to whether or not that's actually the case...
I had problems with the finger reader. He caught the fourth, fifth time. (I added the same one a couple of times and it didn't help.) Today I took off the factory foil and magic. The reader catches off the shot every time!
NippleSauce said:
I remember Samsung saying that a glass screen cover would interfere with the fingerprint scanner. I'm curious as to whether or not that's actually the case...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried a cheap UV-based tempered glass (10 euros) and on my Note 10 it works flawless every time.
And since the S21 series has a much bigger sensor I expect it to work fine as well, I know Whitestone Dome works fine, AND the AmFilm one too.
I used Note 8 for 3 years without screen protector and had maybe 1 micro scratch that was only visible when screen off. Now still using S21U with pre installed screen protector but the feeling of it is not so good, very rubbery especially if fingers are wet. Debetaing to take it of because I have some problems with fingerprint reader too, it's not bad but sometimes it's not detecting the finger.
Make sure your case has a lip guard. That has always worked for me.
I really liked the factory fitted screen protector.
It is more than adequate to protect the screen from scratches from everyday use. Unfortunately the corner peeled off after getting caught on some fabric on the couch so I had to replace it.
I decided against a tempered glass protector for the following reasons:
1. Regular tempered glass SP interfere with the ultrasonic fingerprint reader. Go to amazon and search for s21U TP screen protectors and you'll see what i mean.
2. There are some TG screen protectors that use UV light hardened resins to stick to screen. These are supposed to be fingerprint reader friendly but the good ones like Whitestone Dome are very expensive (for a disposable item) and you have to get a perfect installation, with the resin being a potential hazard if it seeps into the phone.
The cheap ones on the other hand are usually not very good and have a thinned out layer of glass overlying the fingerprint reader that is really irritating to look at.
3. I'm not sure what that UV hardening adhesive does to the oleophobic coating on the screen over a long time.
4. TG screen protectors do not have an anti-reflective coating like the phone screen. So once you apply it, the surface becomes shiny and reflective like glossy screens. This doesnt happen with the softer TPU protectors. Maybe someone who has recently applied a TG SP can post his experience here?
3. TG also adds thickness to the screen as compared to TPU screen protectors, and this is a pretty chunky phone already.
I moved away from tempered glass protectors about 3 years ago after trying a bunch of them and have been using TPU (liquid skin type) SP since then. They are cheap, easy to install, usually come in multi-packs so you can swap them out when it gets dirty or peels off or scratches etc, without breaking the bank or feeling sorry that you have to throw away a $30 - $50 tempered glass protector that you applied with utmost care. The newer materials are also very nice to touch, virtually indistinguishable from the underlying glass.
Having said all this, I have friends that swear by tempered glass protectors and are willing to pay anything to have the feel of glass under their fingers. There's no right or wrong answer here, just what works for you.
enigmaamit said:
I really liked the factory fitted screen protector.
It is more than adequate to protect the screen from scratches from everyday use. Unfortunately the corner peeled off after getting caught on some fabric on the couch so I had to replace it.
I decided against a tempered glass protector for the following reasons:
1. Regular tempered glass SP interfere with the ultrasonic fingerprint reader. Go to amazon and search for s21U TP screen protectors and you'll see what i mean.
2. There are some TG screen protectors that use UV light hardened resins to stick to screen. These are supposed to be fingerprint reader friendly but the good ones like Whitestone Dome are very expensive (for a disposable item) and you have to get a perfect installation, with the resin being a potential hazard if it seeps into the phone.
The cheap ones on the other hand are usually not very good and have a thinned out layer of glass overlying the fingerprint reader that is really irritating to look at.
3. I'm not sure what that UV hardening adhesive does to the oleophobic coating on the screen over a long time.
4. TG screen protectors do not have an anti-reflective coating like the phone screen. So once you apply it, the surface becomes shiny and reflective like glossy screens. This doesnt happen with the softer TPU protectors. Maybe someone who has recently applied a TG SP can post his experience here?
3. TG also adds thickness to the screen as compared to TPU screen protectors, and this is a pretty chunky phone already.
I moved away from tempered glass protectors about 3 years ago after trying a bunch of them and have been using TPU (liquid skin type) SP since then. They are cheap, easy to install, usually come in multi-packs so you can swap them out when it gets dirty or peels off or scratches etc, without breaking the bank or feeling sorry that you have to throw away a $30 - $50 tempered glass protector that you applied with utmost care. The newer materials are also very nice to touch, virtually indistinguishable from the underlying glass.
Having said all this, I have friends that swear by tempered glass protectors and are willing to pay anything to have the feel of glass under their fingers. There's no right or wrong answer here, just what works for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A case with enough lip protection is good enough.
Thank you for sharing you experience. I decided to stay with the factory screen protector. It really love it as it fits the screen so well and is clear as if there was no screen protector.
enigmaamit said:
I really liked the factory fitted screen protector.
It is more than adequate to protect the screen from scratches from everyday use. Unfortunately the corner peeled off after getting caught on some fabric on the couch so I had to replace it.
I decided against a tempered glass protector for the following reasons:
1. Regular tempered glass SP interfere with the ultrasonic fingerprint reader. Go to amazon and search for s21U TP screen protectors and you'll see what i mean.
2. There are some TG screen protectors that use UV light hardened resins to stick to screen. These are supposed to be fingerprint reader friendly but the good ones like Whitestone Dome are very expensive (for a disposable item) and you have to get a perfect installation, with the resin being a potential hazard if it seeps into the phone.
The cheap ones on the other hand are usually not very good and have a thinned out layer of glass overlying the fingerprint reader that is really irritating to look at.
3. I'm not sure what that UV hardening adhesive does to the oleophobic coating on the screen over a long time.
4. TG screen protectors do not have an anti-reflective coating like the phone screen. So once you apply it, the surface becomes shiny and reflective like glossy screens. This doesnt happen with the softer TPU protectors. Maybe someone who has recently applied a TG SP can post his experience here?
3. TG also adds thickness to the screen as compared to TPU screen protectors, and this is a pretty chunky phone already.
I moved away from tempered glass protectors about 3 years ago after trying a bunch of them and have been using TPU (liquid skin type) SP since then. They are cheap, easy to install, usually come in multi-packs so you can swap them out when it gets dirty or peels off or scratches etc, without breaking the bank or feeling sorry that you have to throw away a $30 - $50 tempered glass protector that you applied with utmost care. The newer materials are also very nice to touch, virtually indistinguishable from the underlying glass.
Having said all this, I have friends that swear by tempered glass protectors and are willing to pay anything to have the feel of glass under their fingers. There's no right or wrong answer here, just what works for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nixnixnixnix4 said:
A case with enough lip protection is good enough.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. For most purposes, I agree with you that it's enough. I used to think so too... Never used a screen protector on any of my phones. Tried the tempered glass one on my last phone but felt it was too thick and reflective, so there is away and went with a naked screen. The experience was amazing, interfacing with the screen without any barriers. At least until I got two mysterious scratches on my OnePlus 6 screen, about 2 months apart, one after the other. Never dropped the phone, didn't put it face down, just used it normally. Must've been a grain of sand in my pocket... I'm still not sure to this day what caused the scratches...
I was using a spigen case without a screen protector then. Had to live with those scratches for 2 years. It was heartbreaking to see them everytime... See attached pics.
Since that experience, I vowed never to go with the screen naked again. Maybe I was just unlucky. But the fact that it happened twice is something I cannot ignore, and cannot risk on this new phone. It's too beautiful and too expensive to gamble with, at least based on my personal experience.
Second day I had my Note 10+ it faceplanted on a rough piece of 1/8" thick aluminum angle from pocket height. The metal hit the curve portion of the screen. Oh Yeah... isn't that special?
The case soaked up some of the impact but the factory screen protect was hit and savaged.
It protected the screen, zero damage. gulp.
Been using wet apply Gorilla IQ Sheild after trying a bunch of products including Whitestone.
After 9 months it's still on and while it's due to be replaced it's held up amazing well for $5 a pop.
Unlike the other junk, it's easy to apply and line up properly
I use the Zizo Bolt case to provide to majority of the protection. Raised screen guards on all sides are needed as I learned earlier
After 1.5 years, zero damage.
enigmaamit said:
Must've been a grain of sand in my pocket... I'm still not sure to this day what caused the scratches...
I was using a spigen case without a screen protector then. Had to live with those scratches for 2 years. It was heartbreaking to see them everytime... See attached pics.
Since that experience, I vowed never to go with the screen naked again. Maybe I was just unlucky. But the fact that it happened twice is something I cannot ignore, and cannot risk on this new phone. It's too beautiful and too expensive to gamble with, at least based on my personal experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sand will do it every time. I tried the same experiment over 2 years ago with the same results. I always use a good case and screen protector because permanent scratches pi$$ me off.
Clarification: Case with a lip everywhere and a regular TPU screen protector is great for the majority of use-cases out there. And, it is the cheapest option.
nixnixnixnix4 said:
Clarification: Case with a lip everywhere and a regular TPU screen protector is great for the majority of use-cases out there. And, it is the cheapest option.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And very effective when using a good case.
BDU upper pant leg cargo pockets are great for smartphones...just make sure to keep the rear facing button, buttoned or your will lose it