Related
Hi there
I have read lots of posts on how to enable GPS Photo feature on the kaiser but mine came with it on already. I seem to be having problems exporting these pictures from the phone with the geo data in the Exif tags. I usually just drag them over using the USB connection but when I check them on the PC the GPS data isn't there. I don't know if it is being stripped or just not being attached to the photo. The GPS light is on and the green symbol light up on the screen when I take the pictures.
Does anyone else have the same problem?
The EXIF data should have that. COuld it be the program you are using to read the EXIF data doesn't understand or show the GPS info (or is it just dumping it).
I haven't played with the GPS photo much, but I did find that Picasaweb properly handles GPS EXIF tags now. I use a free program called Shozu (Shozu.com) that after you take a pic will upload your pic to the web, send it via email, post it in blog, etc.. I have it setup to send mine to Picasaweb, and after turning on the EXIF processing in Picasaweb on my account, my pics show the GPS info.
So make sure you are on teh GPS Photo setting of the Camera software (you won't get GPS tags in any other format), then maybe try uploading the pics to Picasaweb (you can create a free account at picasaweb.google.com). If you try this, remember to turn on the EXIF settings first.
Thanks mfrazzz
Since posting this I have checked the photos generated by the kaiser using Exif Reader (which is really neat by the way, no installation needed and tells you just what you need). There is GPS data there:
GPS Informtion
GPSVersionID : 2,2,0,0
GPSLatitudeRef : S
GPSLatitude : 32 3XX6 [DMS]
GPSLongitudeRef : E
GPSLongitude : 151 XX31 [DMS]
GPSAltitudeRef : Sea level
GPSAltitude : 0/1 meters
GPSTimeStamp : 02:01:28
GPSMapDatum : WGS-84
GPSProcessingMethod : HYBRID-FIX
GPSDateStamp : 2007:12:09
The problem I am having is reading that data in Picasa on the PC, or on the web. I copy the images from my Phone over the USB to my desktop and check the Exif data, all appears good. When I drag the pictures into Picasa from the desktop and right click on properties there is no geo data there. I wonder if there is some intermittent problem as this technique has worked a few times in the past.
A picture that did import correctly has different Exif data to the one above:
GPS Informtion
GPSVersionID : 0,0,2,2
GPSLatitudeRef : S
GPSLatitude : 32 4XX0 [DMS]
GPSLongitudeRef : E
GPSLongitude : 151 1XX7 [DMS]
GPSAltitudeRef : Sea level
GPSAltitude : 0/1 meters
Quite a bit missing, interesting.
Update
Just found this on the picasa forum, and sure enough it works
"http://www.gpspassion.com/forumsen/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=75179
I have fixed some of my photos using exiftool (http://
www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/):
exiftool <foldername> -r -GPSVersionID=2.2.0.0
Where <foldername> is the folder where the affected photo files are,
not that this command will set GPSVersionID to 2.2.0.0 for ALL files
within the folder specified in <foldername> recursevly (that means
includding all subfolders within the <foldername>). Having a backup is
recommended. After running that, all of my pics showed up in Picasa
just fine."
The odd thing is that the GPSVersionID tag already seems to be 2.2.0.0 in the images created by the kaiser. Perhaps there is a space at the end??
I've been messing with the GPS Photo function and I'm trying it with Picasaweb and Shozu as mentioned above. I took 5 photos this weekend. The first was just testing, the other 4 were at the park with my family. Between taking the first and the other 4, I changed the camera setting to show the timestamp when the photo was taken. Today I installed Shozu and uploaded all five pics - only the first pic contains any GPS data that Picasaweb has managed to interpret. The last 4 show as blank.
Do you guys have the timestamp set to be shown on the picture? I'm just trying to figure out what might have affected it. The file location is the same, as is the resolution.
I'll try another pic tonight and let you know.
mariom said:
Do you guys have the timestamp set to be shown on the picture? I'm just trying to figure out what might have affected it. The file location is the same, as is the resolution.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I haven't ever turned that on. I also seem to get the same random luck when importing the photos with the GPS Exif data. I think this is more of a problem with Picasa as the pictures I take do have the geo data attached. It might be a simple string mismatch. I guess looking at the Exif protocol would be the next step. Checking the images that do work against the ones that don't so far hasn't thrown much light on it for me.
If I get time I will do some more work on it today.
Hello everybody.Can someone help me please.I am trying to open jpeg files and my phone says that it cannot open them because "either it is not signed with a trusted certificate,or one of it's components cannot be found"
A trusted certificate?On a jpeg file?All my programs work great but I cannot open any pictures using ANY program...What suddenly happened and can I do anything about it?
Thank you
Chris
Greece
When in doubt, hard reset. That should not be an issue unless something was corrupted. Did you install a program that might be set to view picture files? What ROM do you have? More info would be nice. When you post on this forum try to include as much detail as possible. I.e. in your signature like mine.
The Diamond and geotag my pictures.
Is this possible ?
And how ?
i looked at the registry tweak
HKLM\Software\HTC\Camera\P9« DWORD-entry »Enable« to 1.
But on the P9 is already something on, better not change this i think it's has something to do with video.
So is there a other way or tweak for my diamond to geotag ?
P,s; The GPS works like the best iv'e ever had.
I saw in camera settings the menu - add GPS position to foto ...
Where ?
aragornol said:
I saw in camera settings the menu - add GPS position to foto ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry but not in my camera setteings ?
Where is it at yourse ?
not in the menu, and not in advanced options ?
P10 instead of P9 in the registry needs to be set to 1
Yes thanx it works
vaio said:
P10 instead of P9 in the registry needs to be set to 1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you this works !!!
Great tip.
so I enabled geotagging and took some pictures using the GPS Photo mode. I tried uploading them to Flickr and tried using Google Earth to show the locations, but none have worked so far. Could someone shine some light on this one for me? Thanks. P.
did you soft reset?^^
just covering the basis until someone else helps you =p
I tried that too, and I got the same result: not geotagged photos. I guess that what we have to do is use a tracking software that logs the GPS position, as discussed in the forum for another HTC phones, so then we can "mix" the tracking log and the photos, to find out the position where each photo was taken.
Anyway, as I have no experience geotagging photos automatically I'm not sure at all what app would be useful... I guess I have to investigate
geotagging works fine for me... maybe when you upload them to flicker you lose the gps data....
i tried a software called iTag ang i can see mu picture in google earth
You have to have a gps program open though don't you before the tag is applied to the photo? At least I've found unless I have igo, tomtom or whatever open the "initialising gps" never goes away when I choose GPS picture.
Is there another way to do it?
Cheers
peterc_1 said:
so I enabled geotagging and took some pictures using the GPS Photo mode. I tried uploading them to Flickr and tried using Google Earth to show the locations, but none have worked so far. Could someone shine some light on this one for me? Thanks. P.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had troubles too getting Flickr to auto geotag the GPS photos i took with my Diamond, but i found out what the problem was.
First You have to give Flickr permission to import the GPS data from your photos: go to http://www.flickr.com/account/geo/exif/?from=privacy and change the setting.
Next, You have to use the upload application(Flickr Uploadr) when you upload your GPS photos. When you have uploaded your photos, go to Flickr > Organize > Map and click on the newly uploaded pictures and Flickr will automatically place the pictures on the map according to the coordiantes it reads from the EXIF data. It will only work if You use the application.
Ramzidk said:
I had troubles too getting Flickr to auto geotag the GPS photos i took with my Diamond, but i found out what the problem was.
First You have to give Flickr permission to import the GPS data from your photos: go to http://www.flickr.com/account/geo/exif/?from=privacy and change the setting.
Next, You have to use the upload application(Flickr Uploadr) when you upload your GPS photos. When you have uploaded your photos, go to Flickr > Organize > Map and click on the newly uploaded pictures and Flickr will automatically place the pictures on the map according to the coordiantes it reads from the EXIF data. It will only work if You use the application.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but I'd like it to send stright away from my TD, and then Flickr says the best way is to E-mail them and then it won't work. Even with the on;ine app from my PC: "We couldn't find anything matching your criteria."...any other option anyone (to get it done automaticly)
ericsson68 said:
You have to have a gps program open though don't you before the tag is applied to the photo? At least I've found unless I have igo, tomtom or whatever open the "initialising gps" never goes away when I choose GPS picture.
Is there another way to do it?
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the exact same problem... is there a way to solve it? Or is the phone defective?
Thanks!
Flickr problem
Diamond is able to GeoTag my picture and ACDSee shows me that it containts GPS Location data. I finally found GeoTagged pictures in the folder "My POI".
I have enabled EXIF Location import in Flickr (Privacy settings).
But when I upload to Flickr it will not import any EXIF information from my GeoTagged pictures... even when the picture is taken is not imported any more. None GeoTagged pictures still import EXIF information... Any ideas?
Regards, Tor Anders
I have the same problems, it seems like both Flickr and Picasa does not understand the geotag that the Diamond creates. Makes you wonder what application HTC had in mind for this - has anyone been able to use the geotagged HTC photos for anything?
FLICKR Geotag
toralux said:
Diamond is able to GeoTag my picture and ACDSee shows me that it containts GPS Location data. I finally found GeoTagged pictures in the folder "My POI".
I have enabled EXIF Location import in Flickr (Privacy settings).
But when I upload to Flickr it will not import any EXIF information from my GeoTagged pictures... even when the picture is taken is not imported any more. None GeoTagged pictures still import EXIF information... Any ideas?
Regards, Tor Anders
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you upload the pictures with the web upload?
When it comes to Flickr I have tried both web upload and their "Uploadr" application for Windows. Does not work, even after enabling EXIF data does anything show up ...
geotag
hmm thats weird...Flickr has no problems placing my tagged pics on the right place when i drag them in on the map, but only when i use the web application....
Does tha map place it in the right place or is it really you who is placing them? I got the impression that Flickr would automatically move them to the map?
no i just drag them in some random place far away from where they are taken, and the map places them on the right place automatically
There has been some reports that uploading photos to Flickr, geotagged by the camera gps, does not get placed on the map. We have discussed this in http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=399890
Now the question is, has anyone been able to do this? In you have, what ROM and camera version are you using?
I am using the default swedish ROM (see tag) and camera 6.00 (build 31364) and can verify that its not working straight out of the phone.
Hi,
I have been able to get a geotagged photo placed in photrax.com, which is a site for geotagged travel photos.
At the moment you still have to select a place first at this site, but it recognises the GPS data embedded in your photo and then places it correctly, as far as I can see (here is my (ugly, 1st try) photo: http://www.photrax.com/foto_4872
Good luck!
Thanks, but this thread is mainly about Flickr, there are several other sites that read geotags properly, SmugMug for example. Flickr has a lot of 3rd party support functions though thats why its most important right now.
I have tried to geotag some photos, but when I uploaded them to Flickr I found that the location was wrong. For example, this photo was taken in Santiago de Compostela, a city in the northwest of Spain, but it is tagged at France...
I don't know if it's a problem of the diamond or the problem was when it was uploaded to flickr...
zetxek said:
I have tried to geotag some photos, but when I uploaded them to Flickr I found that the location was wrong. For example, this photo was taken in Santiago de Compostela, a city in the northwest of Spain, but it is tagged at France...
I don't know if it's a problem of the diamond or the problem was when it was uploaded to flickr...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats very interesting since it shows that Flickr reads your EXIF data. Could you post your ROM version and camera version. Could you also do me a favour and send me your original photo as it came out of your phone. Email it to me kristian[a]frozenspine.com, attaching it to the forum destroys the EXIF data. You cannot have saved it in another program because that changes the original EXIF data.
try this page to enable the gps
http://www.flickr.com/account/geo/exif
you also might be interested in this flickr group
there´s also a more detailed description on how to enable
geotagging in the discussion forum in that group
http://www.flickr.com/groups/htctouchdiamond/pool/
We are beyond those easy problems. We have EXIF data working, enabled in Flickr too. It seems like some of us have strange EXIF input values...
Krillo said:
Thats very interesting since it shows that Flickr reads your EXIF data. Could you post your ROM version and camera version. Could you also do me a favour and send me your original photo as it came out of your phone. Email it to me kristian[a]frozenspine.com, attaching it to the forum destroys the EXIF data. You cannot have saved it in another program because that changes the original EXIF data.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera is version 6.00 (Build 31364)
The info I get under the control panel is:
ROM Version: 1.35.707.3 WWE
ROM Date: 07/10/08
Radio version: 0.93.25.NS26
Protocol version: 52.26.25.09H
Ah, and my rom is Elite 2.0: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=403296
And I'm sending you the photo...
@zetxek
Hi! Thanks for the photo, I checked your EXIF in Opanda and there is some subtle differences. The obvious thing is the camera build which is (according to the EXIF) 30998_01.
THE GPS data is formatted the same way, no differences there.
The only real difference is under thumbnail where one tags:
JPEG Interchange Format Length
are different, but I don't see how that should make any difference. Oh, and by the way - I uploaded your picture to my Flickr just to test. And it actually places it in Spain, in a town thats called Santiago de Compostela (right?).
This is really interesting since it actually works for you when the the differences between our data is really small. Right now I don't know what to make of it. If you delete the picture from Flickr and re-upload it, does it go to the wrong place again?
I will try that, reuploading the photo. There is another thing, I think I edited the photo with Picasa before uploading it. Maybe saving it corrupted the GPS Data... (I sent you the un-edited version of the photo).
Anyway I'm using a different rom version (Bepe 0.97) and I updated the radio version too, so I will update the post if I notice any difference.
I can just confirm that with the new official 2.0 rom the geotagging seems to work (at least when enabling GPS photo in the registry as explained in the sticky thread about improvements)
Hi All,
I had a previous post entitled "Extracting Both Images from P9 Dual Camera": http://forum.xda-developers.com/p9/help/extracting-images-p9-dual-camera-t3465877. The help I received was excellent and so I thought I'd expand on the question.
I am successfully able to produce a "Bokeh" image from the P9, which would seem to indicate that this image does have depth coordinates embedded in it at least at one point in time. Does anyone know how to extract these depth coordinates from the image in a usable form, such as a matrix? I know one user (ScareIT) suggested Huawei may use steganography to embed the depth coordinates, but after using iSteg (a Mac steganography platform) it does not appear that the image has any hidden coordinates once it is transferred from the mobile device to the desktop.
As always, any help would be highly appreciated.
Best,
Josh
As I wrote on the other thread, the depth information is not hidden anywhere, it's just appended to the end of the file, after all valid JPEG data chunks. The JPEG image actually contains two; one is the processed image with the "bokeh" effect, the other is the original (colour) image that is used to re-apply the "bokeh" effect when editing from the Gallery app. If you take an app like JPEGSnoop and walk through the valid JPEG data chunks, you'll notice that the file is actually larger than what JPEGSnoop shows you. Look at the file in a Hex editor at that offset, and you'll see that the depth information is stored with reduced resolution and 8 bits per pixel, but without any compression whatsoever. This part of the file also contains additional information, such as the selected "aperture", the point of focus, which effect (if any) is applied to the out-of-focus areas, and so on. It should be fairly easy to write an application that can extract this additional information, though it's probably not very useful.