Database Develop

[ROM] Plasma Active for SDE enabled Gen9

Hello Guys,
Here is a plasma active build:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Don't expect much support on this, for me it seems unusable as it is, too slow and not finished. I just wanted to take a look at the way they boot from sdcard.
Installation:
1) You need SDE activated.
2) Unzip files to a directory
3) Copy plasma_rootfs.img to root of storage
4) Flash kernel+initramfs.gz in recovery (details with pictures there).
5) Boot sde
6) Wait, wait, wait! First boot is very slow, I didn't even try a second boot
Download is there (big file, 447 MB)
Thanks to cajl for pointing this and pushing me working on it.

Looks great !
Thank you for your excellent work ! I will try your ROM later....

Yet Another Stupid Question
Does this work also on hdd models?
tapatalked from Desire

BTW, someone promised a KDE-based buid as the usual SDE 'firmware' for gen9. Probably on behalf of Archos itself... Two months ago. Still there are no more signs of progress...
Not allowed to post links here yet, look at dot.kde.org

PLEASE READ:
I talked to a developer working for Archos, the Plasma Active based firmware is going to be the official SDE firmware!
But they're not working on it at the moment, they're trying to get ICS firmware out asap!
ALSO NOTE THAT:
the current plasma active image has no wifi (this is what I was told, haven't tried it yet) and that XORG is not HW Accelerated! The developer who made the Plasma Active based image is waiting for the kernel v3 to be released together with ICS firmware, hoping that a new kernel will fix the issues with WiFi and Hw acceleration.

Thank you, faenil - any piece of information is useful... but why so many capital letters?
faenil said:
I talked to a developer working for Archos, the Plasma Active based firmware is going to be the official SDE firmware!
But they're not working on it at the moment, they're trying to get ICS firmware out asap!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quite reasonable approach for a vendor. No more questions. At least, it is a very good sign that the vendor does not go blindly within the entire Google-driven mainstream but has a broader insight and does try the alternatives. A bad thing IMHO is that the heaviest desktop environment is selected, the least appropriate for XDAs. Yet some people really like it...
the current plasma active image has no wifi (this is what I was told, haven't tried it yet) and that XORG is not HW Accelerated! The developer who made the Plasma Active based image is waiting for the kernel v3 to be released together with ICS firmware, hoping that a new kernel will fix the issues with WiFi and Hw acceleration.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, without wifi it it a pretty useless toy... hw acceleration is less critical for me (but not for others, I think).
On the other hand, once Archos is officially involved into this project, why couldn't they use the existing 2.6.x kernel? It does work within the Android, hence, there are all necessary modules and kernel options being known, written and placed properly. Excuse my ignorance, what is the problem in building the kernel with all the hw features for a particular device yet without Android-specific sw components? Or what is the problem in running a generic Linux userspace on top of it?

Hi gen_scheisskopf,
gen_scheisskopf said:
Yet Another Stupid Question
Does this work also on hdd models?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, still the same issue, I didn't make any progress on this. Sorry :-(

See this information from Basyscom
« Hi Jean-Luc ,
unfortunately we’ll have to wait a bit as the developer edition is required to install plasma edition. Archos wants to publish the developer edition after icecream sandwich being released.
Regards,
Eva »
But letama is faster .....

iourine said:
On the other hand, once Archos is officially involved into this project, why couldn't they use the existing 2.6.x kernel? It does work within the Android, hence, there are all necessary modules and kernel options being known, written and placed properly. Excuse my ignorance, what is the problem in building the kernel with all the hw features for a particular device yet without Android-specific sw components? Or what is the problem in running a generic Linux userspace on top of it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is the guy who's currently building PlasmaActive images is not from Archos the guy from Basyscom http://basyskom.com/news/78-plasma-active-on-archos.html
I don't know if there's any agreement, but I think they'll probably use his work and add the missing features at Archos

Hello letama, nice work here!
Do you have WiFi working in this image?

a1Pha said:
Hello letama, nice work here!
Do you have WiFi working in this image?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, but didn't do much... No, I don't think this build has wifi support yet. They are working on it though.

News?
Hello @ all...
i will test the rom from the first post later today on my Archos G9 101!
The last post was on 8th february, what´s up... is there a developing or not? Because i´m very interessted in this rom for my Archos!
Do anybody knows something about a ubuntu-rom for our Archos G9???
Thank you!
Echse27

Well, I didn't check their progress on it. I'm not really following it, I just did it more as a proof of concept and to get a taste of it. I saw that few builds have been compiled after this one, but I'm out of time to repackage it.

Echse27 said:
Hello @ all...
i will test the rom from the first post later today on my Archos G9 101!
The last post was on 8th february, what´s up... is there a developing or not? Because i´m very interessted in this rom for my Archos!
Do anybody knows something about a ubuntu-rom for our Archos G9???
Thank you!
Echse27
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as I said earlier, this firmware is actively developed by Basyskom and should become the official firmware for SDE, but they're waiting for Archos to release ICS (with the new v3 linux kernel) hoping that the new kernel will fix the problems with WiFi and hw acceleration

o.k. thank you both!
I hope the offical ICS Build will be released soon.
I think the Archos G9 tab will be more potential with an full useable unix-system.
I´m looking forward to that! ;-)

Echse27 said:
o.k. thank you both!
I hope the offical ICS Build will be released soon.
I think the Archos G9 tab will be more potential with an full useable unix-system.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, quite logical and reasonable roadmap. But I do not expect much from KDE-based software. Out of all existing desktop environments, they selected the heaviest one, the least suitable for portables. Surely this is just to have fun and see if it can reallу fly (better to say, crawl) on a tablet. It is very unikely to be a viable product for everyday use.
Ubuntu version looks more promising, at least from performance viewpoint... if only it were not its destructive "innovations" like Unity and Ubuntu One...
Anyways, both have the same problems with hardware support, and both are waiting for the new kernel, first... Second, both will prove their inconsistence in the real life... Third, both will serve only as generic Linux booting platform, waiting for someone to compile a more realistic version. Probably it might be a Gentoo-based compilation with LXDE or XFCE - am I the only person in the world to whom this idea comes? 8-(( Sabayon team is now doing some moves in this direction, but their product is very heavy even for desktops...

iourine said:
Ubuntu version looks more promising, at least from performance viewpoint... if only it were not its destructive "innovations" like Unity and Ubuntu One...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally I'd love to see Xubuntu (or Lubuntu) running

iourine said:
Well, quite logical and reasonable roadmap. But I do not expect much from KDE-based software. Out of all existing desktop environments, they selected the heaviest one, the least suitable for portables. Surely this is just to have fun and see if it can reallу fly (better to say, crawl) on a tablet. It is very unikely to be a viable product for everyday use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used Plasma Active on my Nokia N950 (developer phone, which has a 1ghz single core CortexA8 cpu + SGX530!!) and it was really fluid, I mean 60fps...
don't see your point about performance, given what I've seen on my n950

I tested this ROM yesterday evening...
I think you are right, when you say that there ist a lot of development need before it runs smooth on our devices!
It was very very slow but it looks very goog, i think.
No WLAN or 3G
some funktions are without any funktion! ;-)
realy slow... Booting tooks 15 min.
At this time, this rom isn´t allday useable.
Do anybody know something about a ubuntu-release for tabs like our.... like the old netbook-remix?

Any news about new Plasma-based firmware from Archos? A lot of time has passed since release of kernel v3.x...

[CLOSED] Qualcomm Adreno GPU Drivers for Adreno 420 | Updated [May/16]

DON'T WORK ON QUARK (MOTO MAXX AND DROID TURBO I)!!!
Qualcomm just released their new GPU binaries on developer site
https://developer.qualcomm.com/download/adrenosdk/user-mode-driver-binaries-adreno.zip
Qualcomm Link:
https://developer.qualcomm.com/software/adreno-gpu-sdk/tools

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Using CM13 and this update drivers, I noticed a graphical improvement. But with the BHB27 things got a little unstable.

I know the title says Marshmallow. Just checking, not for 5.1 Lollipop -- like CM12.1?

After using for several days only CM13 of 06/20 with this update in normal use I had no problems except some reboot to make calls. But playing heavy games like Real Racing 3 for a long time, the phone heating up a lot, and restarted. With the stock kernel everything is working great.

LuanGuima14 said:
Qualcomm just released their new GPU binaries on developer site
https://developer.qualcomm.com/download/adrenosdk/user-mode-driver-binaries-adreno.zip
This release contains a developer preview of the user-mode driver binaries for Qualcomm Adreno 3xx/4xx GPU on Nexus 5, Nexus 6, and Nexus 7 devices running Google Android Marshmallow. It has been tested with Soak Test 4. This release is intended only for developers, and does not meet our customer release quality. Please refer to the included readme file for installation.
Install zip nexus 6 via TWRP will work perfectly in any Marshmallow ROM !!
The openGL ES has been updated to version 3.2!!!
Qualcomm Link:
https://developer.qualcomm.com/software/adreno-gpu-sdk/tools
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I post this on my kernel Thread please OP read and change the OP, maybe do your on zip the right zip for Maxx and do not share things before know how they work.
Like I post on the quote... I'm not trying to be impolite...
eniomarcos said:
As I said in a previous post, I decided not to use the kernel for now.
The newly released driver, despite the early stage of development, brings me more personal advantages and has been absolutely stable with the stock kernel.
I have no problem to wait for the graphics driver version that will be interesting to consider for the development of this kernel. My intention was to alert about the incompatibility and know the position of the developer.
This is it. Everything is ok.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
eniomarcos said:
In the future, this kernel is likely to be compatible with new marshmallow qualcomm adreno gpu drivers?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/mot...shmallow-qualcomm-adreno-gpu-drivers-t3401760
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
baybutcher27 said:
You profile is new on XDA don't get this wrong, I'm not trying to be impolite...
Have you check the zip before flash it?
That is a Nexus 6 zip you are sharing, we don't have a Nexus 6, Moto doesn't build Maxx ROM like Google.
So resuming, on Maxx (Custom or stock ROM) the firmware folder is not on vendor folder it is at, etc/firmware, if you flash that you have two adreno firmware, and probably the one that is running is the Maxx using Nexus libs so maybe that alone is the problem not my Kernel.
Have you enable open GL 3.2?
Probably not, if that update enable 3.2 how about enable it on the device to see the effect and improves...
How?
Change build.prop line:
ro.opengles.vrersion=196608 or 196609 to
ro.opengles.vrersion=196610
Open GL version:
196608 3.0
196609 3.1
196610 3.2
After the changes and a reboot + long use, then start report any thing related to the kernel if you have prof that the kernel is the problem in a way I can understand and reproduce, I don't really like user with minimum knowledge of what they are doing report bugs like that, this may not be your case you may know what you are doing but it doesn't seems to me, so if you know sorry.
Again I'm not trying to be impolite...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

baybutcher27 said:
I post this on my kernel Thread please OP read and change the OP, maybe do your on zip the right zip for Maxx and do not share things before know how they work.
Like I post on the quote... I'm not trying to be impolite...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm new at XDA but I have years of experience with roms, mods etc. (from my Galaxy Y which was purchased in 2012 to be precise kkk), this ZIP only shared after testing here on my Moto Maxx and I make sure that everything was working until I obtained a gain nk AnTuTu benchmark in the 3D test jumped from 24k to almost 28k, I tested this driver in stock rom 6.0.1 (soak 4) with your kernel that cha BHB. Thank you for the clarification, do not worry, don't hurt me.... Don't go... kkk

LuanGuima14 said:
I'm new at XDA but I have years of experience with roms, mods etc. (from my Galaxy Y which was purchased in 2012 to be precise kkk), this ZIP only shared after testing here on my Moto Maxx and I make sure that everything was working until I obtained a gain nk AnTuTu benchmark in the 3D test jumped from 24k to almost 28k, I tested this driver in stock rom 6.0.1 (soak 4) with your kernel that cha BHB. Thank you for the clarification, do not worry, don't hurt me.... Don't go... kkk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think you understand my post as you are still sharing a zip that will flash files on the wrong place, again we have a MAXX not Nexus 6 please read this part that I wrote before:
So resuming, on Maxx (Custom or stock ROM) the firmware folder is not on vendor folder it is at, etc/firmware, if you flash that you have two adreno firmware, and probably the one that is running is the Maxx using Nexus libs so maybe that alone is the problem not my Kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you understand what you are doing when flash that Nexus 6 zip?

baybutcher27 said:
Do you understand what you are doing when flash that Nexus 6 zip?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I copied the new driver files to the right folder on the MAXX and adjusted access rights.
Anyway, even before doing so, always using the kernel of stock SOAK4, everything worked well. No reboots.
Still now working well, even after the old drivers are overwritten by new ones - without erasing the original wrong folder.
Using smoothly from the beginning.

baybutcher27 said:
I don't think you understand my post as you are still sharing a zip that will flash files on the wrong place, again we have a MAXX not Nexus 6 please read this part that I wrote before:
Do you understand what you are doing when flash that Nexus 6 zip?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fully understood, thank you again for clarification and apologize for having shared this zip, just wanted to make clear that only shared because it caused no problem here in my Maxx, but since it does not work already made sure

if I was not very clear apologize again because I am using Google translator because my English is very bad

For those who are doing tests with this early version of the driver - for desenvoledores only - there is an update in June, the "m" version.
Do not forget to copy the drivers to the right folder on the MAXX and verify the files system permissions.
I have already installed, and everything is normal.
I will use for a few days to evaluate effects.

Is there any possibility of getting compatible with custom roms?

There's no way to carry the Resurrection Remix? His performance is very good @bhb27

Need testers for AOSP O Preview 2 [Android O for hammerhead]

If you all are ready to test some O, please quote me here. I have a telegram group which needs some testers. Telegram because it will be better in chat. Source is already up on my github. Telegram me directly visiting this link: regalstreak on Telegram
Here is a screen proving it compiles.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Should I say anything or this is just for fun? You can't get android o until google release the code. And msm8974 devices won't run Android O sadly due to new kernel changes, would require lots of backports so be happy with nougat

Sent from my OnePlus ONEPLUS A3003 using XDA Labs

marcomarinho said:
Should I say anything or this is just for fun? You can't get android o until google release the code. And msm8974 devices won't run Android O sadly due to new kernel changes, would require lots of backports so be happy with nougat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe he use some code from caf

thinhx2 said:
maybe he use some code from caf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No he's not xD and that doesn't make any difference

marcomarinho said:
Should I say anything or this is just for fun? You can't get android o until google release the code. And msm8974 devices won't run Android O sadly due to new kernel changes, would require lots of backports so be happy with nougat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What if I give you a working build in a week? Will you be willing to give up your RD title to me if I do give you a working build ? Code is looooong released since april. You just ain't looking in the right places. And msm8974 already boots on bacon for me. Why not hammerhead? Backports? Ofcourse hwbinder has to be backported for 32 bit devices like us in the kernel. I can do that.
Anyone wants to help testing, telegram or quote me. Anyone wants to discourage me, gtfo cry and watch me succeed.

regalstreak said:
What if I give you a working build in a week? Will you be willing to give up your RD title to me if I do give you a working build Code is looooong released since april. You just ain't looking in the right places. And msm8974 already boots for bacon for me. Why not hammerhead? Backports? Ofcourse hwbinder has to be backported for 32 bit devices like us in the kernel. I can do that.
Anyone wants to help testing, telegram or quote me. Anyone wants to discourage me, gtfo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope my friend you won't get android o current features. you only getting merged commits from master branch xD If we all have learned among this years is that you need to wait for the google to release the source code from official android o for start working on that. they don't release the source of preview builds... And about the backports, you'll need some netd backports in the kernel and will be a headache ... Good luck either way :highfive:

marcomarinho said:
Nope my friend you won't get android o current features. you only getting merged commits from master branch xD If we all have learned among this years is that you need to wait for the google to release the source code from official android o for start working on that. they don't release the source of preview builds... And about the backports, you'll need some netd backports in the kernel and will be a headache ... Good luck either way :highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Meh even after you get the source' you want you'll have to rework the kernel. Preview sources are released just for that work. No body is looking for features on previews except for you.

regalstreak said:
What if I give you a working build in a week? Will you be willing to give up your RD title to me if I do give you a working build Code is looooong released since april. You just ain't looking in the right places. And msm8974 already boots on bacon for me. Why not hammerhead? Backports? Ofcourse hwbinder has to be backported for 32 bit devices like us in the kernel. I can do that.
Anyone wants to help testing, telegram or quote me. Anyone wants to discourage me, gtfo cry and watch me succeed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You booted android o on bacon? Can you port for cancro (mi3) ?. Use msm8974 too

thinhx2 said:
You booted android o on bacon? Can you port for cancro (mi3) ?. Use msm8974 too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My close friend did. I've seen it running. If I can get a cancro, sure.

regalstreak said:
Meh even after you get the source' you want you'll have to rework the kernel. Preview sources are released just for that work. No body is looking for features on previews except for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So don't call it android o preview which is not xD it's just nougat with master branch commits :silly:

marcomarinho said:
You can test the builds you want. The point here is that you're saying "Android O for hammerhead" which is not xD this is not the way you should do things in my opinion xD
I'm now going ahead with my life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it is :') It's a preview. I'll call what it is and not "Nougat update for hammerhead" or whatever you want me to call it. :^) Yep you need to go on with your life. Bye!
Mod Edit: Thread Cleaned
May I remind you all of the CoC you're supposed to uphold in being titled members here. Posting racial terms and profanity is a violation of those CoC's. Be very thankful I'm not addressing that any further at this time.
The Merovingian
Senior Moderator
RC-RT Committee
Moderator Committee

Last update of p8 lite firmware

This what Huawei Poland said in comments under post celebrating 1,5 million of active users of p8lite.
Translation from Polish:
Bla bla bla ... P8 lite wont get android 7 update because this device will slow down under nougat bla bla bla....
AND THE INTERESTING PART IS:
This phone will get LAST update for Android 6.0 at the end of 2017. This update will be fixed and fully optimized for this phone.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

kosmitchak said:
This what Huawei Poland said in comments under post celebrating 1,5 million of active users of p8lite.
Translation from Polish:
Bla bla bla ... P8 lite wont get android 7 update because this device will slow down under nougat bla bla bla....
AND THE INTERESTING PART IS:
This phone will get LAST update for Android 6.0 at the end of 2017. This update will be fixed and fully optimized for this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This update will be fixed? Nwm, at least please, android 6.0.1, kernel 3.10.107 and latest gpu mali driver, Huawei plz. I hope we will receive something big(ger).

It's probably going to be a security update lol (These are important too though, thx for 2 year support huawei)

JpegXguy said:
It's probably going to be a security update lol (These are important too though, thx for 2 year support huawei)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe something bigger is coming, bcs we aren't seeing any movement on updates, you know, almost every 5 day a rom is released to other regions(c432, c205 etc). They didn't released anything since almost 15 days... And they said that one more update will come.... Interesting, i hope for something bigger.

We can expect something around 15th of September - that's mainly date of update releases. But... it's still unknown if we'll keep receiving those updates until end of the year or if there will be only one update

D1stRU3T0R said:
This update will be fixed? Nwm, at least please, android 6.0.1, kernel 3.10.107 and latest gpu mali driver, Huawei plz. I hope we will receive something big(ger).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what mali drivers? this chip is 5 years old now, stop.

I don´t know about Huawei, far as i can see B610 is with issues and missing libs that phone can´t find on boot! [ im adding it from other models and seems that is acepting it... true is i don´t see any big change, but the errors are gone from logcat...]
Let´s see where this goes...
.
---------- Post added at 09:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:50 PM ----------
kosmitchak said:
This what Huawei Poland said in comments under post celebrating 1,5 million of active users of p8lite.
Translation from Polish:
Bla bla bla ... P8 lite wont get android 7 update because this device will slow down under nougat bla bla bla....
AND THE INTERESTING PART IS:
This phone will get LAST update for Android 6.0 at the end of 2017. This update will be fixed and fully optimized for this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
System is almost the same, they only "cut" functions, etc... So... slow down under nougat??? How many custom ROMs with Android 7 is in this P8 Lite page??? Any one complains about a slow phone????
Was better if they write " ... P8 lite wont get android 7 update because no longer make enough money for us ...", in that i belive... Android 6 still have bugs, and system tells where and they simply do not bother to find it!
Just do a logcat or see the files in /data/system/dropbox! They tell everthing you need to know!
They simple do copy paste from one model to other, just take and add functions depending on the hardware, etc ....
Huawei ...
.

Audriuskins said:
what mali drivers? this chip is 5 years old now, stop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never stop dreaming easy things.
persona78 said:
I don´t know about Huawei, far as i can see B610 is with issues and missing libs that phone can´t find on boot! [ im adding it from other models and seems that is acepting it... true is i don´t see any big change, but the errors are gone from logcat...]
Let´s see where this goes...
.
System is almost the same, they only "cut" functions, etc... So... slow down under nougat??? How many custom ROMs with Android 7 is in this P8 Lite page??? Any one complains about a slow phone????
Was better if they write " ... P8 lite wont get android 7 update because no longer make enough money for us ...", in that i belive... Android 6 still have bugs, and system tells where and they simply do not bother to find it!
Just do a logcat or see the files in /data/system/dropbox! They tell everthing you need to know!
They simple do copy paste from one model to other, just take and add functions depending on the hardware, etc ....
Huawei ...
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right. Can you release your next rom (b612?) with implemented missing libs from other phones, as well as the new kernel from kio.... Kismi.. You know??. Disable sim pin, so it won't give trouble. Wish you all the best man, I'm still rocking the B608(skipping b610)
Btw, i like their story that nougat would slow down the phone??

D1stRU3T0R said:
You are right. Can you release your next rom (b612?) with implemented missing libs from other phones, as well as the new kernel from kio.... Kismi.. You know. Disable sim pin, so it won't give trouble. Wish you all the best man, I'm still rocking the B608(skipping b610)
Btw, i like their story that nougat would slow down the phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi!
My next mod will be a bit diferent...
It will have Nova launcher as default launcher and will not be Basic or Crossover. And yes, it will have all the fixes... About the kernel... i can give you a a boot for you with that kernel, i don´t like it... sorry...
.

persona78 said:
Hi!
My next mod will be a bit diferent...
It will have Nova launcher as default launcher and will not be Basic or Crossover. And yes, it will have all the fixes... About the kernel... i can give you a a boot for you with that kernel, i don´t like it... sorry...
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When do you release it?

Adi5 said:
When do you release it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When huawei will release next rom...

Adi5 said:
When do you release it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im waiting for the new update patch release.
.

For those questioning... LIARSSSSSS

[ROM][8.1.0][UNOFFICIAL] LineageOs 15.1

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
About LineageOS :-
LineageOS is a free, community built, aftermarket firmware distribution of Android, which is designed to increase performance and reliability over stock Android for your device.
Whats Working
Boots
Sound
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
GPS
Off-line Charging
Can Call and receive call, can receive messages but not send any
What's Not Working
Fingerprint
Video Recording
Sensors
Camera
RIL
Also Massive Battery drain
If anyone knows how to fix these please say because development has pretty much died
Mod Edit: Links Removed
XDA:DevDB Information
LineageOs 15.1, ROM for the Sony Xperia Z5
Contributors
Quantumkk123, EnesSastim, Myself5, Quarx, ReversedPosix, Berni_0815
Source Code: Removed
ROM OS Version: 8.x Oreo
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.10.x
Based On: Lineage
Version Information
Status: Beta
Created 2019-02-20
Last Updated 2019-02-21

good job :good: keep it up guys

Way the go!!!

Yeahhhhhh keep up guys.

It's great that this has finally been posted, but it looks like development had stopped. If anybody wants to see this fully working, please support the only Dev who is still trying to fix bugs. He's not getting any help right now, so if anybody can help with development or donations, please do so. Hopefully we will one day have a fully working 8.0 ROM for our device.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/z5...erimental-lineageos-15-1-z5c-suzuran-t3894617

Yeah so basically because there are other devs who CAN fix this but really can't be fu***d so I mean unless you guys can learn how to fix this stuff I would just suggest buying another phone like I have done

Quantumkk123 said:
Yeah so basically because there are other devs who CAN fix this but really can't be fu***d so I mean unless you guys can learn how to fix this stuff I would just suggest buying another phone like I have done
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi bro maybe we can use other snapdragon 810 device sources for example htc one m9 or another device
İ found this sources :
https://github.com/Claymore1297
İ hope that can help u
Also maybe u check another sources
Good luck bro pls dont stop oreo support because i think our device deserves oreo

SimurgAnka said:
Hi bro maybe we can use other snapdragon 810 device sources for example htc one m9 or another device
İ found this sources :
https://github.com/Claymore1297
İ hope that can help u
Also maybe u check another sources
Good luck bro pls dont stop oreo support because i think our device deserves oreo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope no can do different stuff or whatever, look a reason why I bought a new device was not because of it being old or broken, but because development was slowly n now has completely died and that's none of the developers fault it's Sony's for not releasing Android 8.1.0 or even 8.0 HOWEVER the devs are more than capable of fixing it but it's not in their interest to they have many devices and do development as a hobby clearly this was a big project and I am surprised we even got this far I just kept asking and voila! I mean they kept there word and built it ? now this doesn't mean this rom is particularly abandoned anything is possible so if anyone is willing to develop for this device or just rom to fix the the small major n some minor bugs please go ahead ? I posted this not because I was allowed to but because @ReversedPosix asked me too and we felt bad mostly him tbh but yeah ? this will probably be the last project for this device from any developer

Keep up. It's good to see a post about 8.1 here

Devo7v said:
If anybody wants to see this fully working, please support the only Dev who is still trying to fix bugs. He's not getting any help right now, so if anybody can help with development or donations, please do so. Hopefully we will one day have a fully working 8.0 ROM for our device.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/z5...erimental-lineageos-15-1-z5c-suzuran-t3894617
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many thanks for these words, but unfortunately I'm getting more and more into deep frustration about the issues I can't fix without help.
And I know there are guys who (for example) managed the camera to work but they don't even answer my questions for help or knowledge! Everybody is playing his own game! This way nothing will be done in near future...

There seems to be a working LOS 15.1 for a device with Snapdragon 810 (Moto X Force), but as I have not enough knowledge to develop or build a ROM, this might be of no big help.

Sir Charles82 said:
There seems to be a working LOS 15.1 for a device with Snapdragon 810 (Moto X Force)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Another board, another kernel. No way to adopt it; sorry!
It's not even possible to use sources from another msm8994 board, because the used hardware is not the same; you can't use the drivers; and the drivers from z5* are incompatible with oreo or greater!

Berni-0815 said:
Another board, another kernel. No way to adopt it; sorry!
It's not even possible to use sources from another msm8994 board, because the used hardware is not the same; you can't use the drivers; and the drivers from z5* are incompatible with oreo or greater!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as I'm no developer (liberal arts is my job) I have feard something like that. So Project Treble is of no use to this device also. It's a shame.
Thank you that you tried to maintain the device and solve problems!

Sir Charles82 said:
as I'm no developer (liberal arts is my job) I have feard something like that. So Project Treble is of no use to this device also. It's a shame.
Thank you that you tried to maintain the device and solve problems!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean if all bugs were fixed there was a Dev who was quite eager on giving this device project treble as we can see there isn't any bugs fixed yet so

Sir Charles82 said:
So Project Treble is of no use to this device also. It's a shame.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Treble is just a word. As far as I understand this project, this means that hardware and drivers are separated from app development. There is a layer between "hardware/driver" and app. So, no one needs to change code for drivers; he just can focus on his app development.
The idea behind treble was to reduce the needed work for oem's to update their rom as often as google does.
But as you can see, it fails! If the layer is not supporting legacy drivers, the device is dead!
---------- Post added at 12:30 ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 ----------
Quantumkk123 said:
I mean if all bugs were fixed there was a Dev who was quite eager on giving this device project treble as we can see there isn't any bugs fixed yet so
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In one of your posts you said, that you managed to get the camera to work. Please let me know how this is realized.

Berni-0815 said:
Treble is just a word. As far as I understand this project, this means that hardware and drivers are separated from app development. There is a layer between "hardware/driver" and app. So, no one needs to change code for drivers; he just can focus on his app development.
The idea behind treble was to reduce the needed work for oem's to update their rom as often as google does.
But as you can see, it fails! If the layer is not supporting legacy drivers, the device is dead!
---------- Post added at 12:30 ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 ----------
In one of your posts you said, that you managed to get the camera to work. Please let me know how this is realized.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please tell me where it says I have stated this

Quantumkk123 said:
Please tell me where it says I have stated this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oups! I'm so sorry, it's a mistake! I meant another guy... Sorry! :angel:

Berni-0815 said:
Oups! I'm so sorry, it's a mistake! I meant another guy... Sorry! :angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's fine aha we are human after all we do make mistakes ?

Quantumkk123 said:
Please tell me where it says I have stated this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After searching an while: Here you have written, that (quote) "camera is partially fixed". What about this? :angel:

Berni-0815 said:
After searching an while: Hereyou have written, that (quote) "camera is partially fixed". What about this? :angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah partially meaning some code written to make it work is right but no one ever actually made the camera work