Database Develop

About porting Different ROM for AHD

Hello friends,
I wanted to know if I use this Guide :
1.http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2113479
or
2.http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1908008
Will I be able to port the roms for our AHD?
I don't wanna risk to brick my phone.
1.The guide seems preety good, to work with Joker or Beta 5 as a base?
2.What was the base used for joker?
3.Instead can I use CM 10.0 as a base?But it still has camera issues right?
4.Which Roms will be applicable for me to port?(yes cm10 if i use cm 10 as a base but what if i use joker or stock as base?Is there any forums/list/keyword which will help me find them)
Need some tips and suggestions for the above.
Thank you.

I'd recommend CM as your base. Most ROMs will be compatible.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app

EcHoFiiVe said:
I'd recommend CM as your base. Most ROMs will be compatible.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM 10.0 as a base,
hmm but i have seen that CM 10.0 for ahd doesnt have camera working,
However the nexesque had the camera working, i wonder what base it had(can anyone juz take out the cam files from stock jb/nexesque/wateva)

Difference between Cm, aokp, aosp, pac Roms?

Hii all,
I am confused between cm, aokp, aosp and pac type rom.
Developers make the rom but they dont explain the advantage/disadvantage of these type of rom.
Can someone explain me what are these, there differences and advantages of each rom?
Thanks Gaurenteed..
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app

well cm means(cyanogen mod) they are devs share their sources and its good one.
aokp means(android open kang project) and also they are devs share their sources and sure its diffrent from cm.
aosp(android open source project) that type google it self make it and share their sources and its the clear android version without any changes just the original view that nexus devices have.
and pac means (paranoid +aopk + cm) that means this kind of roms have the whole those thing above together in one rom and its pretty awsome
and for me i used cm10.1 by biel and use scripts (this make the rom more smooth and more active ) so i used the script by slaid480 and it called(fly on mod) and everyghing work good for me
thats it
hope you understand
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app

nizar.nasani said:
well cm means(cyanogen mod) they are devs share their sources and its good one.
aokp means(android open kang project) and also they are devs share their sources and sure its diffrent from cm.
aosp(android open source project) that type google it self make it and share their sources and its the clear android version without any changes just the original view that nexus devices have.
and pac means (paranoid +aopk + cm) that means this kind of roms have the whole those thing above together in one rom and its pretty awsome
and for me i used cm10.1 by biel and use scripts (this make the rom more smooth and more active ) so i used the script by slaid480 and it called(fly on mod) and everyghing work good for me
thats it
hope you understand
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kangs are usually works by devs who carry on development of a released project (which was left by its original devs)
Sent From my GT-S5830.
Current Rom-The Ultimatum
Kernel-Fire OC Kernel
Audio Manager-BEATS
Hit Thanks you unthankful $*%$&. Its There For A Reason.

Unnamed.Ace.User said:
Kangs are usually works by devs who carry on development of a released project (which was left by its original devs)
Sent From my GT-S5830.
Current Rom-The Ultimatum
Kernel-Fire OC Kernel
Audio Manager-BEATS
Hit Thanks you unthankful $*%$&. Its There For A Reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Advantage?
Disadvantage of one over other?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app

devm2024 said:
Advantage?
Disadvantage of one over other?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have only used CM(7.2) till now...
But here is what i know/read and can sum up:
•AOSP-Best ones (performance wise). They are most stable since they are official. They are released only after extreme alpha and beta phases... but not as customizable as others.
•AOKP: They are modded versions of AOSP. Customizable. But I have read somewhere that they drain a lot of battery.
•CM: More fast. More Stable. They are the ones that give you unofficial releases of ICS, JB, etc.
•PAC: Its a hybrid. Cant guarantee battery life. But can be awesome if you put it to use in right way.
However, if you are new to flashing, I'd recommend CM 7.2 (further ones are not as stable as 7.2)... Rest can be used after you get hold of things.
But its up to you to decide.
Best Of Luck....
Plz hit thanks if you think this was helpful.
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao

Unnamed.Ace.User said:
I have only used CM(7.2) till now...
But here is what i know/read and can sum up:
•AOSP-Best ones (performance wise). They are most stable since they are official. They are released only after extreme alpha and beta phases... but not as customizable as others.
•AOKP: They are modded versions of AOSP. Customizable. But I have read somewhere that they drain a lot of battery.
•CM: More fast. More Stable. They are the ones that give you unofficial releases of ICS, JB, etc.
•PAC: Its a hybrid. Cant guarantee battery life. But can be awesome if you put it to use in right way.
However, if you are new to flashing, I'd recommend CM 7.2 (further ones are not as stable as 7.2)... Rest can be used after you get hold of things.
But its up to you to decide.
Best Of Luck....
Plz hit thanks if you think this was helpful.
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everyone have different experience with roms...i have same battery life with aokp and cm10.1,but i use aokp as its faster and smoother..aosp is smoother than cm and aokp,but its not customizable.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app

In simple words,
1) CM offers customisation and control but not as handy as aokp.
2) AOSP roms are the ones that offer no customisation at all unlike cm, aokp etc. They just give you the pure Android experience like your stock rom.
3) Paranoid Android is famously known for bringing tablet like ui on phones with customisation & controls much similar to cm.
4) PAC rom is an integration of all, i.e., aokp, cm and paranoid android.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

Venomous Viper 119 said:
In simple words,
1) CM offers customisation and control but not as handy as aokp.
2) AOSP roms are the ones that offer no customisation at all unlike cm, aokp etc. They just give you the pure Android experience like your stock rom.
3) Paranoid Android is famously known for bringing tablet like ui on phones with customisation & controls much similar to cm.
4) PAC rom is an integration of all, i.e., aokp, cm and paranoid android.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was informative
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao

Unnamed.Ace.User said:
That was informative
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

thienthan6x1 said:
thank you you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont say it just hit it

how to know whic rom i am using whether its aosp,aokp,cm or pac

jesuinodsa said:
how to know whic rom i am using whether its aosp,aokp,cm or pac
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
settings --> about

[Q] Is there vanilla Android for s3 mini?

Please excuse my ignorance in this, but all these roms and mods confuse me, lol.
Is there any way to get original plain Android on the s3 mini? The one without touchwiz, I think it's called Vanilla Android?
My phone is rooted and has a custom rom on it already.
Thanks.

Do you mean the regular stock UI? (Cm10, aokp, etc) if so, a cm10 beta just came out on the maclaw website.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda premium

No, just the plain Android Jelly Bean, like the Google Nexus 4 phone.

viper357 said:
No, just the plain Android Jelly Bean, like the Google Nexus 4 phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's aokp and cm10 man...clean android without any mods or add ons
Sent from my GT-I8190N using xda app-developers app

viper357 said:
No, just the plain Android Jelly Bean, like the Google Nexus 4 phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No sadly, AOSP isn't available because ST Ericsson isnt releasing source codes for our NovaThor chipset which means developers have to build it with their own codes which isnt easy and there aren't many developers are willing to do that, currently only Maclaw is working on CM10

Kvidli said:
That's aokp and cm10 man...clean android without any mods or add ons
Sent from my GT-I8190N using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's awesome, thanks. Told you all these roms confuse me :silly:. So is the one then? - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2176244

viper357 said:
That's awesome, thanks. Told you all these roms confuse me :silly:. So is the one then? - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2176244
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats the old one, get the new one here
http://maclaw.pl/

So, this is unusable then?
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=search&searchValue=I8190

[Q] Cm11 or Omni Rom 4.4?

CM have about 25 million users worldwide, and now Cm11 is taking a huge step forward by using this new easy way to upgrade the smartphone system. Omni Rom 4.4 is a new project, with great and promising fectures and developers. What is the best way to go? They will be nearly the same?

For me there is only CM I`m a big fan since CM 9 ...but i think you should test both and make your own decision what works better for you ...
sorry for this ,but in the end it is subjective where your own preferences are ...
Oliv3go said:
CM have about 25 million users worldwide, and now Cm11 is taking a huge step forward by using this new easy way to upgrade the smartphone system. Omni Rom 4.4 is a new project, with great and promising fectures and developers. What is the best way to go? They will be nearly the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

This boils down to personal preference. They won't be the same - CM will have features that Omni doesn't, and vice versa.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk

Thanks for your reply. Maybe is time to try the dual boot mod for i9000.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

To test both ? :good:
Oliv3go said:
Thanks for your reply. Maybe is time to try the dual boot mod for i9000.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Mackay ROM !!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

Well, I'd try cm11, it works really smooth and the new cminstaler makes life easier to newbies
Enviado desde mi GT-I9000 mediante Tapatalk

Oh you tested the new installer??? I thought that pawitp don`t support our device with this ...
jorgecft said:
Well, I'd try cm11, it works really smooth and the new cminstaler makes life easier to newbies
Enviado desde mi GT-I9000 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

both are good
i think CM11 is a very good rom. i have Mackay KK 4.1.1 on my Galaxy i9000 and it is very very smooth and stable. I also test Mackay Omni rom alpha and i think it is also an interesting Rom.

freakymod2120 said:
Oh you tested the new installer??? I thought that pawitp don`t support our device with this ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use cm11 4.4.1 ..it's very nice the new system update. Works fine in every aspect
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

Sorry i was wrong...you mean the cm updater in CM itself and not the cminstaller for bringing CM to your device with rooting first time and so on ....now it is clear...
Oliv3go said:
I use cm11 4.4.1 ..it's very nice the new system update. Works fine in every aspect
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

I think Omnirom will be great, they're focusing their attention on under-the-hood features of great interest:
Multiwindows,
Delta update,
Reworked DSP
OmniFile
and their development plan will make Omnirom an really appreciated rom

M0Rf30 said:
I think Omnirom will be great, they're focusing their attention on under-the-hood features of great interest:
Multiwindows,
Delta update,
Reworked DSP
OmniFile
and their development plan will make Omnirom an really appreciated rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Multi Windows!!!!? if that 's right then this will be the best ROM for i9000.
But omnirom is still in alpha mode with many issues pending to be solved.
CM nightly have very little minor bugs which can be ignored. I love it. I am using cyanAOSP 1.4.0 KitKat ROM based on CM11 and it is awesome.
this is my 100th post, and finally a senior member on XDA. yippie!!!!

I'm not sure that multi windows is going to be much use to us on a 4" screen..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

I think that we will never see multi windows on i9000 anyway...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

Good. It's a stupid idea IMO lol
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

my personal opinion (and wish) for every ROM/kernel developer would be to focus on power consumption. I have tried many ROM and read too many threads...Not a single ROM/kernel can reach stock ROM's deep sleep figures

aris_p said:
my personal opinion (and wish) for every ROM/kernel developer would be to focus on power consumption. I have tried many ROM and read too many threads...Not a single ROM/kernel can reach stock ROM's deep sleep figures
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is only so much you can do, especially since you're running firmware intended for stronger devices, with dual and quad cores being the norm for ICS/JB nowadays
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk

4.4 ROMs

Can somebody please explain the differences between carbon ROM & CM? All the 4.4 ROMs look/feel the same to me apart from the awful sounds in carbon ROM.
I appreciate all the hard work the devs put in to making the ROMs. Iv been using maclaws 4.4 since initial release & its perfect for my needs.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app

omarblu said:
Can somebody please explain the differences between carbon ROM & CM? All the 4.4 ROMs look/feel the same to me apart from the awful sounds in carbon ROM.
I appreciate all the hard work the devs put in to making the ROMs. Iv been using maclaws 4.4 since initial release & its perfect for my needs.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if its comparision sorry buddy cant help [forum rules] why cant u check out videos in youtube about carbon rom and cm

Yeah I've googled it. They "sound" very different but in practice they feel the same.
I'm only asking for the main differences between them.
Back in the days of 4.1 ROMs dmod etc all the ROMs were very different. Now they don't seem that way.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app

I think that they are very different in the settings but their interface is the same cause they are all basedon the aosp project. If you want to see the differences search videos read the Rom posts or just download them and try them both....
Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk

omarblu said:
Can somebody please explain the differences between carbon ROM & CM? All the 4.4 ROMs look/feel the same to me apart from the awful sounds in carbon ROM.
I appreciate all the hard work the devs put in to making the ROMs. Iv been using maclaws 4.4 since initial release & its perfect for my needs.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can't compare them but i can tell you both are different from system as other roms are different from scripts, smoothness etc, etc. This is the same case if you want to know wich rom is better we can't help you with that but we can recommend you one

omarblu said:
Yeah I've googled it. They "sound" very different but in practice they feel the same.
I'm only asking for the main differences between them.
Back in the days of 4.1 ROMs dmod etc all the ROMs were very different. Now they don't seem that way.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you say back in 4.1 days you know these roms existed in those days its only last year ok ,dmod is by mr dariolob its just only mod name
but cm carbon aokp pac my favorite miui these are large communities for different devices officially they does not support our phone
but thanks to maclaw and thehacka1 we got them unofficially
but dmod is a classic rom for touchwiz lovers