I decided to test how my old Droid 4 will perform in benchmarks in 2017. Here are the first benchmarks. If you want to see more benchmarks, please recommend some of them. You can also post your scores .
Device: Motorola Droid 4
ROM: CyanogenMod 13 (latest Nightly)
Launcher: Nova Prime
Geekbench 4
Stock CM kernel 1.2Ghz: 374/624
OC kernel 1.3Ghz (FullScale Lite): 398/656
My unit will not run at 1.4Ghz stable so I only tested at 1.3Ghz. Benchmark score increased about 6%. I believe that at 1.4Ghz single core score would be over 400.
Comparison:
Galaxy S7 (Exynos 8890, 2.3GHz): 1784/5201 (2016)
Galaxy S7 (Snapdragon 820, 2.15Ghz): 1560/3791 (2016)
LG X Power (MT6735M, 1.3Ghz): 558/1509 (2016)
Moto G (2014) (Snapdragon 400, 1.2Ghz): 427/1060 (2014)
Moto E3 (MT6735P, 1.0Ghz): 425/1122 (2016)
Galaxy S II (Exynos 4210, 1.2Ghz): 424/777 (2011)
Galaxy Nexus (OMAP 4460, 1.2Ghz): 409/651 (2011)
Droid 4 (OMAP 4430, 1.3Ghz): 398/656 (2012)
Galaxy S5 Mini (Exynos 3470, 1.4Ghz): 392/1061 (2014)
RAZR XT910 (OMAP 4430, 1.2Ghz): 369/587 (2011)
Discomark
I ran the tests with OC kernel at 1.3Ghz
Animations were turned off during tests from developer settings and Nova settings
I ran Hot test 3 times (the result is average) and Cold test only once
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hot test results are pretty good but Cold test results quite poor. As long as the app is loaded from the memory (RAM) there shouldn't be any major lag.
Comparison:
AnTuTu
I ran the tests with OC kernel at 1.3Ghz
Total Score: 20503
3D: 139
Marooned: Unsupported
Garden: 139
UX: 9475
UX Data Secure: 3013
UX Data process: 1831
UX Strategy games: 2432
UX Image process: 1564
UX I/O performance: 633
CPU: 9081
CPU Mathematics: 2079
CPU Common Use: 3569
CPU Multi-Core: 3433
RAM: 1808
Comparison:
Galaxy S7 (Exynos 8890): 130909
LG X Power: 31966
Moto G (2014): 22345
Moto E3: 19000
3DMark - Ice Storm:
Ice Storm: 2003
Graphics score: 1765
Physics score: 3788
Graphics test 1: 8.4 FPS
Graphics test 2: 7.1 FPS
Physics test: 12 FPS
Comparison:
Galaxy S7 (SD820)
Forced vertical sync on Android devices limits apps to displaying a maximum of 60 frames per second. Your score will be shown as "Maxed out" if your device hits the vertical sync limit during a test.
Average score: Maxed out!
Physics score: Maxed out!
Graphics score: Maxed out!
Graphics test 1: 60 FPS
Graphics test 2: 59 FPS
Physics test: 54 FPS
LG X power
Average score: 4851
Physics score: 9149
Graphics score: 4285
Graphics test 1: 19 FPS
Graphics test 2: 18 FPS
Physics test: 29 FPS
Moto G (2014)
Average score: 4651
Physics score: 7781
Graphics score: 4176
Graphics test 1: 24 FPS
Graphics test 2: 15 FPS
Physics test: 25 FPS
Moto E3
Average score: 3471
Physics score: 5934
Graphics score: 3106
Graphics test 1: 14 FPS
Graphics test 2: 13 FPS
Physics test: 19 FPS
Flash-A-Holic said:
I decided to test how my old Droid 4 will perform in benchmarks in 2017. Here are the first benchmarks. If you want to see more benchmarks, please recommend some of them. You can also post your scores .
Device: Motorola Droid 4
ROM: CyanogenMod 13 (latest Nightly)
Geekbench 4
Stock CM kernel 1.2Ghz: 374/624
OC kernel 1.3Ghz (FullScale Lite): 398/656
My unit will not run at 1.4Ghz stable so I only tested at 1.3Ghz. Benchmark score increased about 6%. I believe that at 1.4Ghz score would be over 400.
Comparison:
Galaxy S7 (Exynos 8890, 2.3GHz): 1784/5201 (2016)
Galaxy S7 (Snapdragon 820, 2.15Ghz): 1560/3791 (2016)
LG X Power (MT6735M, 1.3Ghz): 558/1509 (2016)
Moto G (2014) (Snapdragon 400, 1.2Ghz): 427/1060 (2014)
Moto E3 (MT6735P, 1.0Ghz): 425/1122 (2016)
Galaxy S II (Exynos 4210, 1.2Ghz): 424/777 (2011)
Galaxy Nexus (OMAP 4460, 1.2Ghz): 409/651 (2011)
Droid 4 (OMAP 4430, 1.3Ghz): 398/656 (2012)
Galaxy S5 Mini (Exynos 3470, 1.4Ghz): 392/1061 (2014)
RAZR XT910 (OMAP 4430, 1.2Ghz): 369/587 (2011)
Discomark
I ran the tests with OC kernel at 1.3Ghz
I ran Hot test 3 times (the result is average) and Cold test only once
Hot test results are pretty good but Cold test results quite poor. As long as the app is loaded in the memory there shouldn't be any major lag.
Comparison:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the tests. At leat it was higher than the S5 mini. Droid 4 is still ticking.
AnTuTu and 3DMark - Ice Storm added
OGdroidster said:
Thanks for the tests. At leat it was higher than the S5 mini. Droid 4 is still ticking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I think that too :highfive:. I decided to run GPU benchmark also. First I tried to run GFXBench T-Rex (ES 2.0) but it failed (out of memory error). So I added 3DMark Ice Storm results instead. It seems that GPU performance and memory are the weak points for Droid 4. Otherwise everything else seems to be okay.
EDIT: AnTuTu also added.
Ps. Could you edit quote a bit smaller?
Flash-A-Holic said:
Yeah, I think that too :highfive:. I decided to run GPU benchmark also. First I tried to run GFXBench T-Rex (ES 2.0) but it failed (out of memory error). So I added 3DMark Ice Storm results instead. It seems that GPU performance and memory are the weak points for Droid 4. Otherwise everything else seems to be okay.
Ps. Could you edit quote a bit smaller?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. I tinker with memory to get it to run properly as I run alot of extensive audio stuff software wise. once i got it perfect it was good to go, memory wise. But GPU can't do much there without the device acting buggy. Just happy this device is ticking :good: oh changed the font to size 1. Its at the top of editing. I never paid attention to it before.
Related
Hey all
This thread is for discussions regarding the general hardware specifications and design features of the Asus Zenfone 2 Laser. Feel free to comment on the reasons for choosing between the variants available.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Specifications ZE551KL:
Display - IPS LCD, 5.5 inches, 1080 x 1920 pixels (~401 ppi pixel density)
Chipset - Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
CPU - Quad-core 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 & quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53
GPU - Adreno 405
RAM - 3 GB
Memory - 16/32 GB, microSD
Camera - 13 MP, 4128 x 3096 pixels, laser autofocus, dual-LED (dual tone) flash
Secondary Camera - 5 MP
Sensors - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Connectivity - Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi hotspot, Bluetooth v4.1
Battery - 3000 mAh
Dimensions - 152.4 x 77.2 x 10.9 mm
Weight - 170 g
Color Availability - Silver
Specifications ZE550KL:
Display - IPS LCD, 5.5 inches 720 x 1280 pixels (~267 ppi pixel density)
Chipset - Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
CPU - Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53
GPU - Adreno 405
RAM - 2 GB
Memory - 16 GB, microSD
Camera - 13 MP, 4128 x 3096 pixels, laser autofocus, dual-LED (dual tone) flash
Secondary Camera - 5 MP
Sensors - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Connectivity - Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi hotspot, Bluetooth v4.0
Battery - 3000 mAh
Dimensions - 152.5 x 77.2 x 10.8 mm
Weight - 170 g
Color Availability - Black, White, Red, Silver, Gold
Specifications ZE500KL:
Display - LCD, 5.0 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels (~294 ppi pixel density)
Chipset - Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410
CPU - Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53
GPU - Adreno 306
RAM - 2 GB
Memory - 8/16 GB, microSD
Camera - 13 MP, 4128 x 3096 pixels, laser autofocus, dual-LED (dual tone) flash
Secondary Camera - 5 MP
Sensors - Accelerometer, proximity, compass
Connectivity - Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi hotspot, Bluetooth v4.0
Battery - 2400 mAh
Dimensions - 143.7 x 71.5 x 10.5 mm
Weight - 140 g
Color Availability - Black/Ceramic White/Silver/Purple/Aqua Blue/Sheer Gold/Glamour Red
source: gsmarena
Actually there are 2 variants of the ZE550KL
The one you mentioned as well as this one:
Specifications ZE550KL:
Display - IPS LCD, 720 x 1280 pixels (~267 ppi pixel density)
Chipset - Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
CPU - Quad-core Cortex-A53 @ 1.5GHz & Quad-core Cortex-A53 @ 1.2 GHz (octacore)
GPU - Adreno 405
RAM - 2 GB
Memory - 16 GB, microSD
Camera - 13 MP, 4128 x 3096 pixels, laser autofocus, dual-LED (dual tone) flash
Secondary Camera - 5 MP
Sensors - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Connectivity - Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi hotspot, Bluetooth v4.0
Battery - 3000 mAh
Dimensions - 152.5 x 77.2 x 10.8 mm
Weight - 170 g
Color Availability - Black, White, Red, Silver, Gold
The Snapdragon 410 version only has a quadcore processor.
There is also a ZE551KL version which is the same as the 615 above but with 3GB RAM and hi-res screen.
EDIT:
I chose the octa-core ZE550KL version for the extra power with low res screen. Battery life is great and not being a gamer, I find no pausing and phone very responsive.
heywheelie said:
Actually there are 2 variants of the ZE550KL
The one you mentioned as well as this one:
Specifications ZE550KL:
Display - IPS LCD, 720 x 1280 pixels (~267 ppi pixel density)
Chipset - Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
CPU - Quad-core Cortex-A53 @ 1.5GHz & Quad-core Cortex-A53 @ 1.2 GHz (octacore)
GPU - Adreno 405
RAM - 2 GB
Memory - 16 GB, microSD
Camera - 13 MP, 4128 x 3096 pixels, laser autofocus, dual-LED (dual tone) flash
Secondary Camera - 5 MP
Sensors - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Connectivity - Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi hotspot, Bluetooth v4.0
Battery - 3000 mAh
Dimensions - 152.5 x 77.2 x 10.8 mm
Weight - 170 g
Color Availability - Black, White, Red, Silver, Gold
The Snapdragon 410 version only has a quadcore processor.
There is also a ZE551KL version which is the same as the 615 above but with 3GB RAM and hi-res screen.
EDIT:
I chose the octa-core ZE550KL version for the extra power with low res screen. Battery life is great and not being a gamer, I find no pausing and phone very responsive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info:good: Good old Asus using the same product number for different devices
I've updated and will add the ZE551KL:good:
There is now a version called the ZE551KL and it has a the same specs as the ZE550KL except that the screen is 1080P, comes with 3GB DDR3 ram, and storage can be 16GB or 32GB.
The ZE551KL runs at 1.5ghz not 1.7ghz
dexter20082001 said:
The ZE551KL runs at 1.5ghz not 1.7ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope it gets root soon xD
deleted
Hi. First of all i search all the forum but couldnt find any solution. As i mentioned Daily usage and gaming became a burden for me. Frankly im suprised that choppy behavior. My brother has HTC m8 and we compared both devices and i lost all of the games
with HTC m8 there is no lag in games and scrolling and browsing the internet, but with note 5 gaming and scrolling is a big issue for me and im really dissappointed. Any help appreciated thanks.
CPUz information\
Samsung Exynos octa 7420
cores=8
big.LITTLE- HMP
Architecture 4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 2.10ghz
4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1.50ghz
revision. R1p0
Process 14 nm
Gpu renderer mali t760
DEVICE
AT&T
samsung. universal 7420
Hardware samsungexynos 7420
Total ram 3663
Available 734 Mb
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Edit :I also tried clear cache
Cant upload pıctures due to message limit . sorry for disturbance
no solutions ?
gezgin__ said:
no solutions ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download Game Tuner from Play Store by Samsung and on opening it'll prompt you to download gameservice on galaxy apps!
Choose Custom and configure your games like: Resolution: Low(720p) and fps: 60 and launch your games from the Game Tuner app. Should be better!
Fullmetal Jun said:
Download Game Tuner from Play Store by Samsung and on opening it'll prompt you to download gameservice on galaxy apps!
Choose Custom and configure your games like: Resolution: Low(720p) and fps: 60 and launch your games from the Game Tuner app. Should be better!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you but still same not working properly. and i wonder isnt that device able to run high end games smoothly _
gezgin__ said:
Thank you but still same not working properly. and i wonder isnt that device able to run high end games smoothly _
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure your device is up to date. Try running antutu benchmark and compare your score! Something appears wrong with your device.
Exynos 7420 and its gpu run Real Racing 3 or Dead Effect 2 and other heavy games as smooth as it gets..
Fullmetal Jun said:
Make sure your device is up to date. Try running antutu benchmark and compare your score! Something appears wrong with your device.
Exynos 7420 and its gpu run Real Racing 3 or Dead Effect 2 and other heavy games as smooth as it gets..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will test and post here with screen shots. I already tested antutu at first day it was 76k then it dropped below 65k (second time)
gezgin__ said:
I will test and post here with screen shots. I already tested antutu at first day it was 76k then it dropped below 65k (second time)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tested my device With;
3dmark
antutu
GFXopenGL
geekbench3
and uploaded pictures . thank you.
gezgin__ said:
I tested my device With;
3dmark
antutu
GFXopenGL
geekbench3
and uploaded pictures . thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now that's a lot of testing Pretty sure the scores look normal although I don't know the last ones, but you can always compare.
I'm pretty sure it's the games you're playing. They're probably not yet optimized for the Note 5. Ask their developers!
Or I guess your gaming needs are too high for this phone! An iPhone 6S or a Nexus 9 might give you a better gaming experience although the Note 5 is still a fantastic gaming device!
Fullmetal Jun said:
Now that's a lot of testing Pretty sure the scores look normal although I don't know the last ones, but you can always compare.
I'm pretty sure it's the games you're playing. They're probably not yet optimized for the Note 5. Ask their developers!
Or I guess your gaming needs are too high for this phone! An iPhone 6S or a Nexus 9 might give you a better gaming experience although the Note 5 is still a fantastic gaming device!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well actually games like shark Evo or any stickman games Im often facing with frame skipping waiting for the 6.0 upgrade if not i will want refund. Thank you for your cooperation
Hello, I bought the phone yesterday (Indian global rom) and after an auto-update for MIUI 12 (12.0.2.0 QFKINXM), installed geekbench 5 and antutu (8.4.4) to try them out. I got substantially lower score in antutu (compared to reviews, YouTube videos) and breakdown showed it's the CPU causing the low score. Upon further benchmarking with Geekbench 5, geekbench 4 and 3dmark it was evident I was getting low score across all the benchmarks where CPU was involved and fantastic score in gpu-only tests (like multiple scenarios in gfxbench).
Then I installed Aida64 and "CPU Monitor" app to further investigate the issue and find possible correlation with temperature etc. The temperature seemed to hover around 55/65 deg while stress testing and 35/40 deg when idle.
I then checked the CPU clockspeed with CPU Monitor app in split screen mode while running Geekbench. I noticed the fastest Kryo gold 485 core (with 2.84 GHz speed never reached the peak). I then ran the Antutu 15-min stress test, and also "CPU Throttle Test" app and "CPU Load Generator" app while keeping the "CPU Monitor" app open in split-screen and noticed the same thing, the most powerful core never reached its peak and mostly runs at idle clock speed of ~800 MHz even when benchmarking. Further, even when that core boosts, it seems capped at 2.4 GHz which is thehe maximum clockspeed of other 3 Kryo gold 485 cores. I know 2.84 GHz isn't supposed to be a sustained speed but the fact that it never reached it and gets capped at the same speed as the other 3 cores implies something is wrong here.
Also I don't really know if the poor score is solely caused by the poor performance of that 2.84 GHz core but I do know from observation that the core isn't running as intended as I explained above.
Now if it's a software issue then i wouldn't worry much as it'll possibly get fixed in next updates or by installing custom rom. But I'm worried if the issue is related to hardware itself (problematic CPU core or heatsink issue).
So I'm writing to know if any of you guys have had such issue or what do u think it is caused from or possible fix. Also
Any constructive suggestion will be highly welcome.
Geekbench 5 CPU score: single core ~600, multi-core ~2200 to 2300
Antutu 8 CPU score: ~90k (sometimes much less)
I have an mi 9t pro with the global miui 12.0.1 and it's similar to what you're saying, so it's not a hardware issue, it's the kernel, it seems that Xiaomi it's very conservative about the battery and throttles the prime core to 2.4ghz max
The only thing that have worked for me was to change the kernel to another one, I'm trying Yuki kernel and it's very good, also there's a new kernel, quantic, and it's very good too, the battery doesn't seems to take a big hit, it's fine for me, like the original kernel, sorry if my english it's not perfect, I'm from Mexico
Omarrrc1 said:
I have an mi 9t pro with the global miui 12.0.1 and it's similar to what you're saying, so it's not a hardware issue, it's the kernel, it seems that Xiaomi it's very conservative about the battery and throttles the prime core to 2.4ghz max
The only thing that have worked for me was to change the kernel to another one, I'm trying Yuki kernel and it's very good, also there's a new kernel, quantic, and it's very good too, the battery doesn't seems to take a big hit, it's fine for me, like the original kernel, sorry if my english it's not perfect, I'm from Mexico
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, thanks for your reply and your English is awesome.
Now regarding the kernel change, all the reviewers and YouTubers benchmarked it in stock and most of them didn't face such problem. Their score seems reasonably similar to each other.
Also do u remember if your CPU benchmark score was substantially lower than standard before changing kernel?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
60c is where CPU starts to throttle, prime core never runs at max freq for more than 3-4 mins regardless of temperature to save battery and wear from the heat it's producing on stock kernel.
Also never forget how much a impact ambient temps play a part in phone performance, I've put my phone in the freezer for 5-10 mins and saw a 500 multi core score although that was on a warm 40c Aus summer day lol
As others have suggested try custom rom if you really need max performance although it is completely unnecessary and a waste of time pursuing max performance, take it from someone who's been there.
The result after a month of trying every combination of roms and kernels lol
hoopsnake said:
View attachment 507762560c is where CPU starts to throttle, prime core never runs at max freq for more than 3-4 mins regardless of temperature to save battery and wear from the heat it's producing on stock kernel.
Also never forget how much a impact ambient temps play a part in phone performance, I've put my phone in the freezer for 5-10 mins and saw a 500 multi core score although that was on a warm 40c Aus summer day lol
As others have suggested try custom rom if you really need max performance although it is completely unnecessary and a waste of time pursuing max performance, take it from someone who's been there.
The result after a month of trying every combination of roms and kernels lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply. However my issue is it never reached 2.84 GHz and is artificially capped at 2.4 ghz. I'm not talking about the core being constant at 2.84 GHz.
Also I'm not necessarily looking for absolute max performance as I'm not a gamer but just wanna investigate the issue to make sure it's not hardware issue.
Btw if you've come back to stock rom/kernel, can you pls test and mention the geekbench 5, antutu 8, 3dmark scores for K20 pro?
Hi
I have Xiaomi Mi 10T with Snapdragon 865 with Adreno 650 GPU and 8 GB LPDDR5 RAM and I used Konabess app to Overclock GPU to beat ROG Phone 5 in Vulkan performance.
You can use them to undervolt SD870 and OC to 683 MHz that the limit but early SD870 can be overclock to 900Mhz.
I used This two tables to overclock to 905-940Mhz.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Adreno 660 is just overclock on Adreno 650 from Snapdragon 865.
If you want more performance look for CAF ROMs like I did.
I'm using Xdroid ROM with is CAF ROM.( CAF stands for the CodeAurora Forum. It is like the name says, an online forum (just like XDA, except, the forum is more for OS developers than flashmaniacs) where Qualcomm releases source codes and patches for their CPUs. Code Aurora is a kind of an initiative in which brands can release the open-source codes for SoCs(CPUs) for future software development. )
First few technical staff.
1000 Gigaflops = 1 Teraflops/TFLOPS
Adreno 650 on 587 MHz has 1202 Gigaflops
Poco F3 Adreno 650 on 670 MHz has 1372 Gigaflops
Snapdragon 888 - Adreno 660 on 840 MHz has 1702 Gigaflops
Adreno 650 on 905 MHz has 1853 Gigaflops
Adreno 650 on 940 MHz has 1925 Gigaflops
You can calculate this very easily
Shading units 512 * freq 0.905 * 4 = 1853 Gigaflops = 1.8 TFLOPS
Compere to home consoles last gen
PS4 has 1.84 TFLOPS
Xbox One S 1.4 TFLOPS
Nintendo switch 1TFLOPS docked and undock around 500 Teraflops.
I overclock my Adreno 650 to 940Mhz giving me performance of SD888 with new drivers OpenGL 604 ( In two versions in attachment below if you want try on 865/870 new drivers)
Performance is incredible just from driver it self. Stock freq 587 MHz gives 4230-4150 score in Wild life just like SD870.
I used 940MHz and 905MHz on TURBO_L0 Voltage.
You can click on any images to get closer view.
Here is AnTuTu before overclock on stock freq 587MHz and 3Dmark Wild life
Now here we go to 940Mhz overclock with GPU.
AnTuTu Score beats Mi 11 and few SD 888 smartphones.
Here is Wild life and Wild life stress test.
Here are bonus 3DMark Sling **** Extreme Unlimited and Geekbench 5 Vulkan Compute test
And here are temp of Red Magic 6 series phones.
And here is temperature of all big SD888 phones to compere.
Here is test which show how many Watts GPU uses.
Overclock to 905-940Mhz with new drivers v604 use 7W on of power without idle screen 0.8W compere to SD888 which is much higher around 1.5W
SD888 GfxBench Manhattan 3.1 off screen 117 fps with 8W-8.5W of power.
Gfx Benchmark Manhattan 3.1 off screen 112-115fps with 7W
Running Genshin Impact on 60fps highest gets 7.2W of power with 58fps almost lock and SD888 uses 8.5-11W to run this game.
Duplicate thread closed
Kindly continue discussions in the existing thread
Xiaomi Mi 10T with Snapdragon 865 beats ROG phone 5 with GPU Overclock
Hi I have Xiaomi Mi 10T with Snapdragon 865 with Adreno 650 GPU and 8 GB LPDDR5 RAM and I used Konabess app to Overclock GPU to beat ROG Phone 5 in Vulkan performance. If you need anything help here is my new group on Telegram for support in...
forum.xda-developers.com
Thanks
I have the Redmi Note 11 6GB/64GB variant (bought it less than a week ago). I got to doing some benchmarking of my phone. I first checked the benchmark scores for my device on various sites and YouTube videos.
First, the Geek Bench 5 scores should be (according to YT reviewers' videos and other websites) around 364 for single core and 1500 for multi core . My device's score was 171 for single core and 911 for multicore.
Then I performed the AnTuTu benchmark and the scores should be around 270k but my score was 173847. Now that's a lot of difference, I wouldn't mind if the score was like 220k or something but 270k to 170k is a lot of difference.
I performed the benchmark tests in the first place because I was facing lag even while using Instagram and scrolling through WhatsApp and Telegram, I have restarted my device several times, the free RAM is always around or more than 3GB, I don't have many apps installed either. I have more than 50% of my storage free, nothing heavy was running in background while testing either. I don't play heavy games or stuff but I at least want my daily use experience to be smooth, what's the point if I can't even scroll Instagram without facing lags?
Here are the screenshots of the scores from Geek Bench and AnTuTu.
I'm extremely dissatisfied with this, should I get a replacement? I'm not really sure if the issue is with my device's hardware or it's MIUI's fault. If it's the latter then I'm ready to flash a custom rom to my phone if it will fix the issue. What could be the problem? Any help is appreciated.
_voldemort_with_a_nose_ said:
I have the Redmi Note 11 6GB/64GB variant (bought it less than a week ago). I got to doing some benchmarking of my phone. I first checked the benchmark scores for my device on various sites and YouTube videos.
First, the Geek Bench 5 scores should be (according to YT reviewers' videos and other websites) around 364 for single core and 1500 for multi core . My device's score was 171 for single core and 911 for multicore.
Then I performed the AnTuTu benchmark and the scores should be around 270k but my score was 173847. Now that's a lot of difference, I wouldn't mind if the score was like 220k or something but 270k to 170k is a lot of difference.
I performed the benchmark tests in the first place because I was facing lag even while using Instagram and scrolling through WhatsApp and Telegram, I have restarted my device several times, the free RAM is always around or more than 3GB, I don't have many apps installed either. I have more than 50% of my storage free, nothing heavy was running in background while testing either. I don't play heavy games or stuff but I at least want my daily use experience to be smooth, what's the point if I can't even scroll Instagram without facing lags?
Here are the screenshots of the scores from Geek Bench and AnTuTu.
I'm extremely dissatisfied with this, should I get a replacement? I'm not really sure if the issue is with my device's hardware or it's MIUI's fault. If it's the latter then I'm ready to flash a custom rom to my phone if it will fix the issue. What could be the problem? Any help is appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same problem
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
thats the 4/64 variant of mine
also the LTE speeds are trash
Raider0001 said:
View attachment 5580313
thats the 4/64 variant of mine
also the LTE speeds are trash
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya the LTE speeds are somewhat slower on this phone. At my home, on my Pixel 4a I get 20-40 Mbps with Airtel 4G, but on Redmi note 11 I get around 15-30 Mbps. It never cross 30 and reach 40 like pixel 4a.
I have the 6GB/64GB variant.
Also slower WIFI speeds. I have a BSNL Fiber wifi at home. Its just 2.4 Ghz but my pixel 4a reach speed upto 90-100 Mbps, whereas Note 11 never cross 50 Mbps. I know Note 11 will give faster speeds with 5Ghz wifi, but sill if pixel can reach 100mbps with 2.5ghz wifi then Note 11 should have been able to reach those speeds too.
Anyways, 50Mbps wifi and 30Mbps LTE speed is enough for me. So no complaints. LTE speed increases to 50-60mbps when I am in good network coverge area.
it fixed itself or the update i did manually helped (V13.0.7.0.RGKEUXM) but the score now is this:
Raider0001 said:
it fixed itself or the update i did manually helped (V13.0.7.0.RGKEUXM) but the score now is this:
View attachment 5588385
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you make a couple of phone calls and try out the same benchmark? I am sure you should see decreased performance.
Check this for what's going on in detail.
*** New Device Forum Requests ***
Please post all your requests here. The forum admins choose new device forums carefully, based on several factors. There's no guarantee your device will have a forum created here, but feel free to posts your requests in this thread :) Please do...
forum.xda-developers.com
Unfortunately, xda-developers not allowing a forum to be created for this device(Redmi note 11 spes) for reasons unknown despite so many requests!
After a phone call the cpu caps at 50%. I had this phone.