Database Develop

Official ARM. Project Thread

After much practice into linux, i went for a C coding workshop for android. Basically i doubled, maybe even tripled my skill level. I finally am able to promise you something not pointless to this society which feels great hatred on me. I already got over this. I hope such releases can ease the scams in may.
The new kernel, based on ARM.'s vanilla kernel common, will be a 3.4.11 kernel. It features full tweaks to all over the source. Expect little features on initial release. The releases in the front will be focused entirely on fixing the kernel sources itself. The major merge all the way to the latest kernel version might have caused bugs to appear

nicholaschw said:
After much practice into linux, i went for a C coding workshop for android. Basically i doubled, maybe even tripled my skill level. I finally am able to promise you something not pointless to this society which feels great hatred on me. I already got over this. I hope such releases can ease the scams in may.
The new kernel, based on ARM.'s vanilla kernel common, will be a 3.4.11 kernel. It features full tweaks to all over the source. Expect little features on initial release. The releases in the front will be focused entirely on fixing the kernel sources itself. The major merge all the way to the latest kernel version might have caused bugs to appear
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again?? Aren't you tired? You went over it but people from the forum certainly not. I absolutely don't wanna argue with you but yesterday Jarred aka Universal SS droped the ARM thread and today you are back.And you are not the same person. Certainly not. You are like bad news,they never fail.

nicholaschw said:
After much practice into linux, i went for a C coding workshop for android. Basically i doubled, maybe even tripled my skill level. I finally am able to promise you something not pointless to this society which feels great hatred on me. I already got over this. I hope such releases can ease the scams in may.
The new kernel, based on ARM.'s vanilla kernel common, will be a 3.4.11 kernel. It features full tweaks to all over the source. Expect little features on initial release. The releases in the front will be focused entirely on fixing the kernel sources itself. The major merge all the way to the latest kernel version might have caused bugs to appear
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good for you. Hope it works out better this time and test thoroughly before release and after changes.
might is a understatement. It almost certainly will cause bugs to appear (the most common bug is it not booting when major changes are made to the kernel base). Also allot of the bugs from the kernel don't show symtoms they just go wrong and use a few more KB of memory or that bit restarts and causes a slight slowdown or it takes a few milliseconds longer to complete its task etc.
Edvin73 said:
Again?? Aren't you tired? You went over it but people from the forum certainly not. I absolutely don't wanna argue with you but yesterday Jarred aka Universal SS droped the ARM thread and today you are back.And you are not the same person. Certainly not. You are like bad news,they never fail.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your comments (although highly entertaining) don't do much, at least he's trying. Your right though: some information is contradictory.
EDIT: Have a taco

xonar_ said:
Good for you. Hope it works out better this time and test thoroughly before release and after changes.
might is a understatement. It almost certainly will cause bugs to appear (the most common bug is it not booting when major changes are made to the kernel base). Also allot of the bugs from the kernel don't show symtoms they just go wrong and use a few more KB of memory or that bit restarts and causes a slight slowdown or it takes a few milliseconds longer to complete its task etc.
Your comments (although highly entertaining) don't do much, at least he's trying. Your right though: some information is contradictory.
EDIT: Have a taco
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't get it
First it was Nicholas who said he's handing it to a new maintainer, who is Jared, right? And Jared mentioned it has been dropped support
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2034227&page=10
Good news for everyone!ARM. will drop support for the LG optimus black!Hope everyone is happy and have a nice day.(I'll still be in the forums though)Moderators please lock this thread
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And now ARM Project's back?

Yes. He is fed up of this community. So, he turned over to support HTC. I give him my support for DNA. Now, i comeback to finish off what is destroyed, complete whats junk, and make it into something like a useful book into a library. Thanks xonar. I still have one last lesson. I did not learn drivers. edv, as said above, thats my motive. And, the reason why i comeback is the value of my life. You rather change an enemy into a friend rather than gaining more opposition.

nicholas for f--k sake !!! , once you have the kernel going post the topic and flatter yourself ,, you never learn do you

If this is going to turn into a flame war then I'll close it as that's not needed here but as it's posted in General, you should be here to discuss the topic. It's been explained why the other one was dropped but if nicholaschw wants to try develop something out of it let him and just ignore this thread if you don't have anything productive to add to it. This wasn't posted in Development so he's not expected to have the kernel ready to post so discussion is allowed here.
Thanks
AvRS

ARM Project TEAM.
To get away our doubt to you, may I ask you something about your ARM Project?
You have many thread there,
Optimus Black
Optimus 2X
Xperia Arc
HTC Droid DNA
Samsung Galaxy S3; and
Google Nexus 4.
And I got this post,
nicholaschw said:
We are an non-profit organisation alike cyanogenmod, but only focusing on creating a global aftermarket kernel for the Android OS, specifically to remove the major setbacks of linux.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're involved with (kind of) non-profit organization (alike CyanogenMod), can we know who's the members of your team? AFAIK, you don't own the phone in personal. So you (might) develop those kernel alone by yourself, or how many developers in your team?
I read your ARM. Project Recruitment, and it seems no one interested, so this non-profit organization doesn't existed yet, or you already have your own internal team?

redy2006 said:
To get away our doubt to you, may I ask you something about your ARM Project?
You have many thread there,
Optimus Black
Optimus 2X
Xperia Arc
HTC Droid DNA
Samsung Galaxy S3; and
Google Nexus 4.
And I got this post,
So you're involved with (kind of) non-profit organization (alike CyanogenMod), can we know who's the members of your team? AFAIK, you don't own the phone in personal. So you (might) develop those kernel alone by yourself, or how many developers in your team?
I read your ARM. Project Recruitment, and it seems no one interested, so this non-profit organization doesn't existed yet, or you already have your own internal team?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We currently are five-membered. Xperia is full, me, jared and pidozz. Two more are under evaluation. See ARM.'s git

Good Luck with whatever you're doing, I hope you learn someday.

My better half made me a delicious taco and while eating I read the comments.
It was not my intent to flame, neither argue with anyone. I will rather get drunk and party till morning. Good year everyone.
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium

Edvin73 said:
My better half made me a delicious taco and while eating I read the comments.
It was not my intent to flame, neither argue with anyone. I will rather get drunk and party till morning. Good year everyone.
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Off topic but good year to you too,here they don't serve tacos
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium

hmm, 80% of repos are forked from already good kernels from such devs like gokhanmoral, CM, garwedgess, coolya, etc.
it's like forking Diana kernel then adding a little touch.
Even your "bproj repo" is a clone from huexxx https://github.com/ARMP/bproj-black/blob/master/Makefile#L198 yet you pushed it as initial commit. I understand, maybe you're shy to fork it repo to repo.
Your Makefile on the repo shows:
export KBUILD_BUILDHOST := $(SUBARCH)
#ARCH ?= $(SUBARCH)
ARCH ?= arm
#CROSS_COMPILE ?= $(CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE:"%"=%)
CROSS_COMPILE ?= /home/huexxx/android/arm-2010q1/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Lol. He gets owned pretty much doesnt he?
In the Nexus 4 forums he told us that he works for google btw.

realfelix said:
Lol. He gets owned pretty much doesnt he?
In the Nexus 4 forums he told us that he works for google btw.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if i am, i would be in the newspapers. I'm so young. And go look at the post. FATHER. One more thing, this post is useless as gab himself is more capable to give this community a kernel

Thread closed as per OP request.

[Share] Paranoid Android 4.0 Beta Unofficial Luster builds [KitKat 4.4.2]

I'm only sharing to you. All credits is to Bpear/Luster
Info+download:
http://www.gizmoluster.com/2013/12/paranoid-android-4-0-beta-unofficial-luster-builds-kitkat-4-4-2/
[]s
VW

I want those per app dpi features. They're so awesome!
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

victorwalter said:
I'm only sharing to you. All credits is to Bpear/Luster
Info+download:
http://www.gizmoluster.com/2013/12/paranoid-android-4-0-beta-unofficial-luster-builds-kitkat-4-4-2/
[]s
VW
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Paranoid android specifically asked that no builds are shared at this early stage and previous threads have been locked. Do you have their permission to share this?
FuMMoD said:
I want those per app dpi features. They're so awesome!
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although the pa ui is simple to use, the xposed module "app settings" is very good at delivering per app dpi and tablet ui
-----------------------
Sent via tapatalk.
I do NOT reply to support queries over PM. Please keep support queries to the Q&A section, so that others may benefit

rootSU said:
Paranoid android specifically asked that no builds are shared at this early stage and previous threads have been locked. Do you have their permission to share this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nor does he need any permission to share. they themselves put it out, it got picked up by that site, and he shared that site. if they do not want anyone to share, then they should not put it out. that is how it works.

simms22 said:
nor does he need any permission to share. they themselves put it out, it got picked up by that site, and he shared that site. if they do not want anyone to share, then they should not put it out. that is how it works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not how it worked here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2558519
They said you can build it for yourself, but do not share publicly. That's why it suggests to me that permission should be gained. Not only out of courtesy and respect (as is often the case here on XDA - as well it should) but also as they explicitly came here and requested things not be shared.
The fact it is on github does not mean they want it to be shared. Github is a collaboration tool first and foremost. To say they cannot use the collaboration tool within their own team otherwise it's fair game for people disrespecting there wishes is unfair. Sure. they may now want the build to be shared publicly, and if that is the case, perhaps this thread should be locked as a duplicate and the original re-opened, but I haven't seen any official statement here yet that public sharing is now accepted.
I think perhaps we should ask @ApriliaM3 for comment as the moderator locking the last thread at PA's request

rootSU said:
That is not how it worked here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2558519
They said you can build it for yourself, but do not share publicly. That's why it suggests to me that permission should be gained. Not only out of courtesy and respect (as is often the case here on XDA - as well it should) but also as they explicitly came here and requested things not be shared.
The fact it is on github does not mean they want it to be shared. Github is a collaboration tool first and foremost. To say they cannot use the collaboration tool within their own team otherwise it's fair game for people disrespecting there wishes is unfair. Sure. they may now want the build to be shared publicly, and if that is the case, perhaps this thread should be locked as a duplicate and the original re-opened, but I haven't seen any official statement here yet that public sharing is now accepted.
I think perhaps we should ask @ApriliaM3 for comment as the moderator locking the last thread at PA's request
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didn't know it.. sorry for that.
mod please close this.

victorwalter said:
i didn't know it.. sorry for that.
mod please close this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, lets at least see what is to be said. The staff here may know newer information than I have. I just wanted to ask the question

rootSU said:
That is not how it worked here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2558519
They said you can build it for yourself, but do not share publicly. That's why it suggests to me that permission should be gained. Not only out of courtesy and respect (as is often the case here on XDA - as well it should) but also as they explicitly came here and requested things not be shared.
The fact it is on github does not mean they want it to be shared. Github is a collaboration tool first and foremost. To say they cannot use the collaboration tool within their own team otherwise it's fair game for people disrespecting there wishes is unfair. Sure. they may now want the build to be shared publicly, and if that is the case, perhaps this thread should be locked as a duplicate and the original re-opened, but I haven't seen any official statement here yet that public sharing is now accepted.
I think perhaps we should ask @ApriliaM3 for comment as the moderator locking the last thread at PA's request
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
again, they shared it publicly. if they share it publicly, then whoever wants can share it. their permission is not needed. and, on top of that, since they shared it publicly, they also need to provide the kernel source. if not, then they are violating gpl.

simms22 said:
again, they shared it publicly. if they share it publicly, then whoever wants can share it. their permission is not needed. and, on top of that, since they shared it publicly, they also need to provide the kernel source. if not, then they are violating gpl.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what you're saying is that the original thread was locked in error. Meaning this thread should be locked and the original re-opened.

rootSU said:
So what you're saying is that the original thread was locked in error. Meaning this thread should be locked and the original re-opened.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no. they have every right to close an xda thread if they want, it it might never be opened, if they dont want. they have that right. but xda isnt the only public website. they shared it publicly, not in private, on another website. since it was shared publicly, it is public now. and anyone who grabs it has the right to reshare it. dont get me wrong, i do not use PA, nor do i want to try it. but, as a rom that is shared publicly by them, they lose the right to say that no one can share it. while it was not public, in a private testing group, they can say it. but cant say it about a publicly shared rom. this thread isnt opened by them, and shares what they share in public on a different site.

simms22 said:
no. they have every right to close an xda thread if they want, it it might never be opened, if they dont want. they have that right. but xda isnt the only public website. they shared it publicly, not in private, on another website. since it was shared publicly, it is public now. and anyone who grabs it has the right to reshare it. dont get me wrong, i do not use PA, nor do i want to try it. but, as a rom that is shared publicly by them, they lose the right to say that no one can share it. while it was not public, in a private testing group, they can say it. but cant say it about a publicly shared rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats just it though, they didnt share it on or to the other website. At least I cannot see anywhere on the site linked in the OP that PA shared a build. Its a quote from a G+ post (and link back) that had no builds then 5 unofficial builds added. So nothing has changed since the last lock. The site in question appears to have done the same as the OP of the last thread which was locked.

rootSU said:
Thats just it though, they didnt share it on or to the other website. At least I cannot see anywhere on the site linked in the OP that PA shared a build. Its a quote from a G+ post (and link back) that had no builds then 5 unofficial builds added. So nothing has changed since the last lock. The site in question appears to have done the same as the OP of the last thread which was locked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is also a possibility. if that site shared it without permission, than these builds are still public, unfortunately. whoever is the spokesperson for pa will have to take care of it. they can also ask a mod to remove it from here, then a mod will decide if its appropriate to remove or leave(most likely they would remove it). but it is up to them to ask to remove it.

All OP has to do is just point to the Google plus community group page and tell us to download the betas through there. I'm sure they allow linking to their community page at least.
https://plus.google.com/+ParanoidAndroidCorner/posts

FuMMoD said:
All OP has to do is just point to the Google plus community group page and tell us to download the betas through there. I'm sure they allow linking to their community page at least.
https://plus.google.com/+ParanoidAndroidCorner/posts
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So is it just me who cant find any official betas on there?
-----------------------
Sent via tapatalk.
I do NOT reply to support queries over PM. Please keep support queries to the Q&A section, so that others may benefit

rootSU said:
So is it just me who cant find any official betas on there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't either. You know, they had planned to release something last weekend but the host of their gerrit went down so they couldn't. Do you guys really want a release of PA without Hybrid? without PIE? without Halo?. I mean, they'll give it to us anyways but frankly I don't see the point. Why not use one of the 100 other ROMS with the same features in each while you wait? I mean just look at the ROMS out for hammerhead right now, they're all remarkably similar. Granted if you look at that feature list of the "beta" there are a few standout features but other than that why do you guys want a ROM that won't have what makes PA unique? You've waited 1.5+ months you can't wait a little longer? lol.

zxyz said:
Do you guys really want a release of PA without Hybrid? without PIE? without Halo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No not at all..

I looked also and didn't see any.
You could make a build yourself and cherry pick those things but don't be surprised if it won't boot or if it does you get lots of bugs.
The stripped PA is only while it's in beta. From what I understand, hybrid still has an issue with DPI right now and they're working on combining halo and pie. Plus the hosting issues with their gerrit. I don't think normal PA builds will be too far behind the betas. At least hopefully.
Just check out their gerrit. A crap load got merged on the 18th now that they're back up and there's some cool stuff up for review too. ParanoidOTA, Knock Knock to sleep, battery light, something about voiceplus. Who knows what will and won't get merged but the PA guys are hard at work. They recently switched up their hosting too so now that that's all taken care of, the ball is finally rolling.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Oh I have to give this a try! I have been waiting for paranoid.

All the sweet features like halo and hybrid have been broken by kitkat. That's why they haven't released anything official yet.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

FuMMoD said:
All the sweet features like halo and hybrid have been broken by kitkat. That's why they haven't released anything official yet.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They may have been broken by KitKat I have no clue. But PA themselves said that they have build a brand new clean base for 4.4 and are building off of that. So they are making sure everything works great with the new base then the features will be added. I've been using PA 4.0 since that site posted the beta and I can say its fast and smooth just like stock and the immersive mode is great.
>^.^< Sent From Meow nexus5

Android 4.4.3 is gonna release tomorrow? Maybe!

Like the topic says, in these hours on the net emerged a new image from Samsung Devs, discussing over some docs in the new update. What do you think?
In your opinion the date is tomorrow?

And how long before the mods close this 4.4.3 thread? Taking bets....I say 2 hours!

thranduil93 said:
Like the topic says, in these hours on the net emerged a new image from Samsung Devs, discussing over some docs in the new update. What do you think?
In your opinion the date is tomorrow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hopefully tomorrow I gave you a thanks for being brave enough to start this thread, and the crap you will hafta put up with from this wretched forum

oh look, imagine that, another 4.4.3 rumor, and another 4.4.3 rumor thread..

Regardless, I have been disappointed in Google's lack of fixing things. I just wish we could get an official ETA window from Google.

I'm in before the lock. (thread closure)
/Inb4lock
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

These rumor threads never go well. Let's wait until there is something more official
Closed

Petition Xiaomi to relase Mi3 source code.

Guys rather than whining about Xiaomi not releasing the kernel source code Why not we force them to release it.
We can sign in for this petition and get the kernel source codes of the device we purchased
We totally need 500 supporters. Already there are 354 supporters
Please help and fight for your kernel source rather than begging them :highfive::fingers-crossed:
http://www.change.org/en-IN/petitio...pt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition

Shahan_mik3 said:
Guys rather than whining about Xiaomi not releasing the kernel source code Why not we force them to release it.
We can sign in for this petition and get the kernel source codes of the device we purchased
We totally need 500 supporters. Already there are 354 supporters
Please help and fight for your kernel source rather than begging them :highfive::fingers-crossed:
http://www.change.org/en-IN/petitio...pt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hugo Barra just stated that they will release the kernel source soon.

TomYaMee said:
Hugo Barra just stated that they will release the kernel source soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Soon?? Dude its been a long time since mi3 was released...kernel sources should be released with the release of phone.
I thought at least after releasing mi4 they might release. But again he told it will be released. Most probably in fall that's a log time

True...
They sud release it right away...
either fix the existing bug on miui ( push notification ) or release kernel so that we can get on with cynogenmod ...

Shahan_mik3 said:
Soon?? Dude its been a long time since mi3 was released...kernel sources should be released with the release of phone.
I thought at least after releasing mi4 they might release. But again he told it will be released. Most probably in fall that's a log time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just trying to say that petition is useless when Hugo Barra itself announced that they WILL release the kernel source.

TomYaMee said:
I was just trying to say that petition is useless when Hugo Barra itself announced that they WILL release the kernel source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1

TomYaMee said:
I was just trying to say that petition is useless when Hugo Barra itself announced that they WILL release the kernel source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.... I understand .
But at least forcing might help release the kernel sooner then expected. As he never mentioned when
Just a hope and a try

You guys also need to understand that the petition won't do any good as no one can enforce it as the company is safe behind China's laws.
The only way you will make a difference is maybe a petition to stop buying their devices until they start following the gpl like everyone else.

zelendel said:
You guys also need to understand that the petition won't do any good as no one can enforce it as the company is safe behind China's laws.
The only way you will make a difference is maybe a petition to stop buying their devices until they start following the gpl like everyone else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So Tell Which OEM gives you Snapdragon 800,2GB RAM,Updates,13MP camera bla bla at$228.

zelendel said:
You guys also need to understand that the petition won't do any good as no one can enforce it as the company is safe behind China's laws.
The only way you will make a difference is maybe a petition to stop buying their devices until they start following the gpl like everyone else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@thejoker has got the main point.
The next best phone at 220$ is moto g which dropped 20$ after mi 3 release.
Except that the only choice is Asus zenfone
The cheapest SD 800 phone is nexus 5. Which still costs almost 500$
A used one costs 400$
This is the only device we can get and let's see what happens. It takes a few secs for sign up.
What's there to loose?

zelendel said:
You guys also need to understand that the petition won't do any good as no one can enforce it as the company is safe behind China's laws.
The only way you will make a difference is maybe a petition to stop buying their devices until they start following the gpl like everyone else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, if you want users to stop buying their device why there's a forum for Mi3 on XDA?
---------- Post added at 12:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:34 AM ----------
Shahan_mik3 said:
@thejoker has got the main point.
The next best phone at 220$ is moto g which dropped 20$ after mi 3 release.
Except that the only choice is Asus zenfone
The cheapest SD 800 phone is nexus 5. Which still costs almost 500$
A used one costs 400$
This is the only device we can get and let's see what happens. It takes a few secs for sign up.
What's there to loose?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a useless try you're doing, petition won't help you in any way, they'll release Mi3's source code when they'll feel to do so
Mi2/Mi2s got their code released few months after when their next flagship Mi3 got released all we can do is being patient.

lovegambler said:
lol, if you want users to stop buying their device why there's a forum for Mi3 on XDA?
---------- Post added at 12:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:34 AM ----------
That's a useless try you're doing, petition won't help you in any way, they'll release Mi3's source code when they'll feel to do so
Mi2/Mi2s got their code released few months after when their next flagship Mi3 got released all we can do is being patient.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We made this forum to allow the users to get together and help change the company. Trust me if they don't change their ways when it comes to the gpl then the forum may NOT be staying.
It is not when they feel like it. There are laws to follow.

zelendel said:
We made this forum to allow the users to get together and help change the company. Trust me if they don't change their ways when it comes to the gpl then the forum may NOT be staying.
It is not when they feel like it. There are laws to follow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree..... There are tons of ppl who have been waiting for this and thanks to XDA....there are unofficial builds of Roms
Also due to this more ppl might buy it...
There was a fan meet in Bangalore with Hugo Barra......I missed it or else I would have requested him the reason and to release source code

zelendel said:
We made this forum to allow the users to get together and help change the company. Trust me if they don't change their ways when it comes to the gpl then the forum may NOT be staying.
It is not when they feel like it. There are laws to follow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too agree with you buddy but as it's Chinese firm they are safe because of their law structure, can't force the Govt to change the law for a single firm.
Shahan_mik3 said:
I agree..... There are tons of ppl who have been waiting for this and thanks to XDA....there are unofficial builds of Roms
Also due to this more ppl might buy it...
There was a fan meet in Bangalore with Hugo Barra......I missed it or else I would have requested him the reason and to release source code
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hehe me too wanted but I live in New Delhi so had no choice and as per the reason the source code for Mi3 will be released when Mi4 will get enough limelight, source code for Mi2/Mi2s were released few months after the launch of Mi3, we can just wait for them to do so
And Hugo himself said in an Interview that source code will be released by the end of this year
Having my fingers crossed on his words:angel:

lovegambler said:
I too agree with you buddy but as it's Chinese firm they are safe because of their law structure, can't force the Govt to change the law for a single firm.
hehe me too wanted but I live in New Delhi so had no choice and as per the reason the source code for Mi3 will be released when Mi4 will get enough limelight, source code for Mi2/Mi2s were released few months after the launch of Mi3, we can just wait for them to do so
And Hugo himself said in an Interview that source code will be released by the end of this year
Having my fingers crossed on his words:angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes....I spoke to xiaomi India's head and he assured that the kernel will be released in December

lol, you still made this thread when you knew that all the time?

lovegambler said:
I too agree with you buddy but as it's Chinese firm they are safe because of their law structure, can't force the Govt to change the law for a single firm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why we made this forum. So the users could get together and help change them. They will have to change a few things before they can think about releasing the device in many parts of the world. At first HTC and Samsung were doing the same thing. The users rallied and now they release it right away.
If they don't change then this forum will be a failure and be removed.

lovegambler said:
lol, you still made this thread when you knew that all the time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude I made this thread on 13th and I spoke to the head....when I went to get a redmi 1s for beta test

zelendel said:
That's why we made this forum. So the users could get together and help change them. They will have to change a few things before they can think about releasing the device in many parts of the world. At first HTC and Samsung were doing the same thing. The users rallied and now they release it right away.
If they don't change then this forum will be a failure and be removed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Without XDA there were no devs ready to even make a unofficial ports.
Only thanks to it there are 3 Roms ....
.see we have nothing to loose to try
But after meeting them yesterday and after explanation came to know that Xiaomi looses most of its users to aosp and the only profits they get from cloud and other software services will be gone.
Once again xiaomi is not a hardware oriented company like Samsung etc

Shahan_mik3 said:
Yes. Without XDA there were no devs ready to even make a unofficial ports.
Only thanks to it there are 3 Roms ....
.see we have nothing to loose to try
But after meeting them yesterday and after explanation came to know that Xiaomi looses most of its users to aosp and the only profits they get from cloud and other software services will be gone.
Once again xiaomi is not a hardware oriented company like Samsung etc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't matter if they are or not. They are required by law to release it upon device release.
No big surprise they lose most to aosp not a lot of trust for a closed sourced distro that one day had nothing and then the next had enough capital to start a company. Makes me wonder if other rumors are true.

Good news! Kernel will be released soon!

Ah, kernel source code will be released soon...!!!!
What do you think, guys!?
Official mention
[5 month later...] Would BlackSharkCode update this repository? · Issue #2 · BlackSharkCode/BlackShark_Kernel_OpenSource
I bought Black Shark 3S, Is the repository here not updated anymore, can you provide a device tree and kernel like Xiaomi?
github.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

koumaza said:
Ah, kernel source code will be released soon...!!!!
What do you think, guys!?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope they also release fastboot rom for this device,slow developement compare to other Xiaomi model.some basic setting like double tap to wake/sleep not exist on global rom,slow fingerpirnt sensor,push notification bug!kind of regreting a little now

cinmil said:
Hope they also release fastboot rom for this device,slow developement compare to other Xiaomi model.some basic setting like double tap to wake/sleep not exist on global rom,slow fingerpirnt sensor,push notification bug!kind of regreting a little now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not receiving push notifications is fatal... I think too
Probably an optimization for the game, but it's not necessary.
However, I like the hardware very much.
Fastboot ROM source code will probably not be released as it is.
[email protected] or you're able to comment on the issue.

@BlackSharkCode commented 27 days ago
[5 month later...] Would BlackSharkCode update this repository? · Issue #2 · BlackSharkCode/BlackShark_Kernel_OpenSource
I bought Black Shark 3S, Is the repository here not updated anymore, can you provide a device tree and kernel like Xiaomi?
github.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's laugh... Hah-hahha‍
Kernel will not be released, at least for while you're alive.

I'm hating all of this so much, a simple file, they have to upload a single file, and after 26-27 days nothing to be seen. This is not the only issue, there is another one with the same answer. It is as if air came out of thei mouths

Im trying to ask myself why still they haven't upload the kernel source yet? There's so much hardware potential on the phone being hold back just waiting to get unleashed .
Hoping they'll released it this year together with others 865 devices

i contacted them, the same Jason answered me :
Jason (Black Shark)
Jan 25, 2021, 15:30 GMT+8
Hello
We have not released KR for BS3 yet, which would take awhile for the leadership to make such strategic decision.
Best Regards,
Black Shark Global
so.... no way...
Last blackshark i buy

sco-mito said:
i contacted them, the same Jason answered me :
Jason (Black Shark)
Jan 25, 2021, 15:30 GMT+8
Hello
We have not released KR for BS3 yet, which would take awhile for the leadership to make such strategic decision.
Best Regards,
Black Shark Global
so.... no way...
Last blackshark i buy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok we are not going to get anything

Frostum21 said:
Ok we are not going to get anything
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We will if you stop thinking that way but instead you can comment on that github page coz the devs are replying there. Demand that we really need them to release the souces. You should get what's your $ worth and it might become your most worth it buy when they decided to release it

sco-mito said:
i contacted them, the same Jason answered me :
Jason (Black Shark)
Jan 25, 2021, 15:30 GMT+8
Hello
We have not released KR for BS3 yet, which would take awhile for the leadership to make such strategic decision.
Best Regards,
Black Shark Global
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is an LOL! If the LEADERS STRATEGY is to increase the sales, then releasing the kernel sources will definitely attracts more users because of the phone's development potential will increase by 10 folds.

Jbazt_katuforzs said:
We will if you stop thinking that way but instead you can comment on that github page coz the devs are replying there. Demand that we really need them to release the souces. You should get what's your $ worth and it might become your most worth it buy when they decided to release it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comment on GitHub? I answered every comment blacksharkcode has done, I contacted the email of the GitHub account. They're not replying, they replied one time, more than 30 days ago

Frostum21 said:
Comment on GitHub? I answered every comment blacksharkcode has done, I contacted the email of the GitHub account. They're not replying, they replied one time, more than 30 days ago
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see. Thanks for doing that. Hmmm this is frustrating and disappointing. I wish there's a link where someone can truly help us report them coz its hard to think I'll be spending my months with a closed source device. It's fine if they're consistent on the security patches and ota s, but thats not been the case. I'd be willing to take a 3rd of my money back as a refund FAK I WILL NOT BUY ANY BLACKSHARK PHONE AGAIN EVER.

The question here is whether there is a person named Jason.
I also contacted Global Support twice, and Jason took care of it all.
Only distrust remains.

Took it to Xiaomi's github aswell, let's see if we can get an answer.
Blackshark 2/3/3s/3pro Kernel source · Issue #2191 · MiCode/Xiaomi_Kernel_OpenSource
Will the kernel source for the Xiaomi Blackshark 3 be released soon? I did some research about promises from Blackshark/Xiaomi and i'm really worried! Sources for Blackshark 2 were promised but NEV...
github.com

Yes really good

Kernel! Kernel! Kernel! Custom Roms! Ahhhhhh! Kill me pls

I'm not sure but back on those days of Android 2.3.4, I used to successfully crossed ports official OEM firmwares from other devices with similar CPU/GPU. All that it need back then was a custom recovery of the port's recipient and a backup of the firmware we trying to port. I stopped playing around with my phones these passed few years, so I'm wondering if we could do that as well to the recent Android versions? I believed we have similar SOC/Android versions phones that's currently active in development. We already got custom recovery anyways.