Related
CyanogenMod 12.1These are builds of CyanogenMod 12.1 using JustArchi's repos, modified to support the Xposed Framework.
XPOSED IS NOT INCLUDED, FLASH IT!
Link to Xposed
What's the difference here?
This ROM is DEODEXED, that's the difference. Now, the first boot speed will be slower.
Google says:
Dex file compilation takes more time than dexopt, which can be noticeable when all of a user's apps must be compiled during first boot (after factory reset or after receiving an OTA). To reduce the amount of compilation needed, ART supports the option of pre-optimizing libraries and applications in the system partition. Including the pre-optimized dex files takes space in the system image, so these options trade first boot time for system image size. Enabling WITH_DEXPREOPT causes everything in the system image to be pre-optimized. If this makes the system image too large, additional options can be specified to reduce the amount of pre-optimization.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And why Xposed now works?
Xposed for Android 5.1 is on Alpha stage. Therefore, it's unstable and has a lot of problems.
The developer of the unofficial port, romracer, explained:
If your ROM gzip's (compresses) the .odex files in /system, then Xposed will not work and you will bootloop. This is due to patchoat handling the gzipped odex files, but not correctly patching them for Xposed. This causes Xposed to trigger continuous re-dexopt'ing of the compressed odex file.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, a deodexed ROM fixes the problem.
DOWNLOADS
20150829
XDA:DevDB Information
CyanogenMod 12.1 for i9300, ROM for the Samsung Galaxy S III I9300
Contributors
brianelv, JustArchi, Moster2, arter97
Source Code: https://github.com/ArchiDroid
ROM OS Version: 5.1.x Lollipop
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.0.x
Based On: CyanogenMod 12.1
Version Information
Status: Beta
Created 2015-08-30
Last Updated 2015-08-30
Changelog
2015-08-29
- Initial release
Reserved.
Are these builds just reverting the dlmalloc tweaks?
whatsgood said:
Are these builds just reverting the dlmalloc tweaks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Archi changed the ROM from deodexed to odexed. It only affects the first boot (that's the "faster first boot" tweak). It's useless, and breaks the compatibility with Xposed.
So, is same rom with the change "Enable dex-preoptimization" reverted? u update cm sources too?
Im afraid to flash a rom that dont comes from oficial developer, will u test all build on your phone before post here? i dont want to brick my phone.
Thanks from compile and share this build.
galen2 said:
So, is same rom with the change "Enable dex-preoptimization" reverted? u update cm sources too?
Im afraid to flash a rom that dont comes from oficial developer, will u test all build on your phone before post here? i dont want to brick my phone.
Thanks from compile and share this build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it's the same ROM. I like CyanogenMod 12.1 so I'll update it frequently. And yes, I do tests before posting, with and without Xposed.
brianelv said:
No. Archi changed the ROM from deodexed to odexed. It only affects the first boot (that's the "faster first boot" tweak). It's useless, and breaks the compatibility with Xposed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you spread false information? Dex-preoptimization doesn't affect only first boot and I described why.
JustArchi said:
Why do you spread false information? Dex-preoptimization doesn't affect only first boot and I described why.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same, odexed or deodexed. I tested it, and there are no improvements. Besides, odexed roms breaks Xposed. So, what's the problem using a deodexed rom?
Archi, you made a LOT of optimizations, you're the best with this. But odexed roms with Xposed are not compatible. With odex I can't see any difference, and I need Xposed, so I disabled it. Other people needs Xposed too (I think) so I shared it.
brianelv said:
It's the same, odexed or deodexed. I tested it, and there are no improvements. Besides, odexed roms breaks Xposed. So, what's the problem using a deodexed rom?
Archi, you made a LOT of optimizations, you're the best with this. But odexed roms with Xposed are not compatible. With odex I can't see any difference, and I need Xposed, so I disabled it. Other people needs Xposed too (I think) so I shared it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are no improvements?
Keep using your xposed builds then, you're too ignorant to notice the difference.
brianelv said:
No. Archi changed the ROM from deodexed to odexed. It only affects the first boot (that's the "faster first boot" tweak). It's useless, and breaks the compatibility with Xposed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Brother, Calm down. Don't use so mean words like 'useless' which may not look good to the original developer.
Whatever you are doing is based on the months of hard work done by developers like @JustArchi . Have some respect on their opinions or decisions.
As I said before, many Xposed lovers would appreciate your work which is based on ArchiDroid sources with Xposed support. Just make sure to communicate your thoughts in meaningful good words.
Xposed 5.1 officially released! Now supports odexed roms
I'll update the thread later.
Link of Xposed: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3034811
any screenshots ?
The Unlegacy-Android ProjectIntroduction
Unlegacy-Android started out as the OMAP4-AOSP Project. It was created in late 2015 in order to maintain a clean and organized place for pure AOSP support for various OMAP4 devices, such as the Galaxy Nexus and the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 series. Over time this evolved to support more than just these devices, but still maintains its roots of supporting "legacy" devices that no longer receive "official" updates: hence Unlegacy-Android was born.
Installation
It's important that /system needs to be unmounted before installing the ROM - some recoveries tend to leave it mounted after performing operations on it.
If you're planning to install GApps, be sure to read the second post!
Aside from these, installation and upgrading is no different than on other ROMs. As usual, 'espresso' goes for all non-3g versions, 'espresso3g' goes for all 3g versions.
Problems
- Occasional sound stuttering in some games
- No hwrotation (meaning the boot animation is landscape on p31xx). I don't consider this as a problem, as autorotation will take effect after bootup anyways... and most 7" tablets, like the Nexus 7 work this way as well.
- The 7.1 builds are experimental! Means: modem not working perfectly yet.
If you notice anything else, be sure to report it in this thread. While I'm kind of busy, I usually read the thread and acknowledge the bug reports, even if I don't reply directly to them.
Downloads
See: http://builds.unlegacy-android.org
Always use the latest TWRP, to flash Android 7.x, you must use TWRP 3.0.3-0 or newer.
Features?
There isn't much to say here - this is AOSP, if you install GApps, you pretty much get the same thing that's running on the Nexus devices. The aim of this project is to create a fast and stable ROM - although, one could use Xposed to add extra features.
As usual, feedback is appreciated
Want to support development? You can consider donating, I spent countless of hours with this
XDA:DevDB Information
Unlegacy Android Project, ROM for the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2
Contributors
Ziyan, Android-Andi
Source Code: https://github.com/Unlegacy-Android
ROM OS Version: 7.x Nougat
ROM Firmware Required: The latest bootloader for your device.
Version Information
Status: Beta
Current Stable Version: 4.4, 6.0
Created 2016-07-03
Last Updated 2017-10-22
GApps
If you want to install GApps, we recommend Open GApps Nano or BaNkS GApps.
An important note: as this is a pure AOSP ROM, installing GApps tends to be problematic: in order to try to avoid installation issues, be sure to install GApps immediately after installing the ROM, before booting the system for the first time. After the initial bootup finished, be sure to go into Settings -> Apps, and grant every permission to every Google application - most importantly, Google Play services.
In the case of an upgrade, be sure to re-install the GApps package, as upgrading wipes /system. You shouldn't need to re-set the permissions afterwards.
siealex said:
One more note. DO NOT set up your Google account until you grant all permissions, otherwise you will be stuck on the initial setup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rooting
You can flash either the latest SuperSU or OpenSource SuperUser to get rooted.
Ziyan said:
GApps
If you want to install GApps, we recommend Open GApps Nano or BaNkS GApps.
An important note: as this is a pure AOSP ROM, installing GApps tends to be problematic: in order to try to avoid installation issues, be sure to install GApps immediately after installing the ROM, before booting the system for the first time. After the initial bootup finished, be sure to go into Settings -> Apps, and grant every permission to every Google application - most importantly, Google Play services.
In the case of an upgrade, be sure to re-install the GApps package, as upgrading wipes /system. You shouldn't need to re-set the permissions afterwards.
Rooting
You can flash either the latest SuperSU or OpenSource SuperUser to get rooted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, i saw this rom on galaxy nexus section. Does this rom included CMA?
Bastiary said:
Wow, i saw this rom on galaxy nexus section. Does this rom included CMA?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, at least not yet. I think that the big thing for this will be 3.4 in the near future - I made some very good progress with it, aside from camera not working yet, there are only minor problems remaining
Thank you for everything , dear friend ! And for the support of the old device , and what you are doing and Andi for us ordinary users .
I understand correctly , that support will only 6.0.1 Android N and we do not see , because the device and its old base ?
Az-09 said:
I understand correctly , that support will only 6.0.1 Android N and we do not see , because the device and its old base ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before every new Android release, we devs get all sorts of questions like this. I'd like to say it once and for all: there's no such thing as 'we do not see' the next versions and whatnot. People are being negative for some reason, but we always try and succeed in the end... I'm sure that if you start reading past posts, you'll find a lot of people saying that we1l never see Lollipop or Marshmallow due to the device being too old, lol.
Download link?
It just says look at the top of the page? Is it soon?
Thanks for the new ROM....keep it up!
All the best...
radz_ said:
Download link?
It just says look at the top of the page? Is it soon?
Thanks for the new ROM....keep it up!
All the best...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
check download tab section.
Hello! The ROM with the codename "espresso" is for the version: Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 Wi-Fi P3110 / P3113 and Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 Wi-Fi P5110 / P5113. Namely we talk about all versions with codename "espressowifi"?!
pickmod said:
Hello! The ROM with the codename "espresso" is for the version: Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 Wi-Fi P3110 / P3113 and Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 Wi-Fi P5110 / P5113. Namely we talk about all versions with codename "espressowifi"?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, that's correct.
Dear Mr. @Ziyan,
1stable congrat and thx Sir for being ROM Maker, we would love to see you update it regularly and add these:
*feature list
*changelog
*screenshot
~Omaple~
"...stay success and keep tab 2 alive at least till 2020"
Screeshots
Astro Noid said:
Dear Mr. @Ziyan,
1stable congrat and thx Sir for being ROM Maker, we would love to see you update it regularly and add these:
*feature list
*changelog
*screenshot
~Omaple~
"...stay success and keep tab 2 alive at least till 2020"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no need for this, it's aosp there isn't any custom features and everybody know how aosp looks
Astro Noid said:
Dear Mr. @Ziyan,
1stable congrat and thx Sir for being ROM Maker, we would love to see you update it regularly and add these:
*feature list
*changelog
*screenshot
~Omaple~
"...stay success and keep tab 2 alive at least till 2020"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh don't worry, I'm working extremely hard in the background almost since like a year... I know a lot about these devices (bought a P5100 specifically for testing 3G on the builds and kernels)
Feature list: well, this is AOSP, and I'd like to keep it this way. Imagine this like the stock ROM on the Nexus devices (with GApps flashed, of course).
Changelog: don't expect anything other than AOSP updates and hardware related fixes and updates - of course, I'm going to write a post each time I release an update, just like I do in the Galaxy Nexus thread however, it's unlikely that I'll add a changelog to the OP (I just don't see the usefulness in it).
Screenshots: will do, but then again, don't expect anything special. Stable and fast pure Android, that is AOSP. As a side note, it's Xposed compatible
I hope everybody likes the new shiny unified forum section! There's still a bit of a work left to do, but I think it looks great and eases maintaining the threads; blame me if you think otherwise :silly:
Thak you for your effort to keep tab 2 alive . Amazing work. Are RRO Layers compatible with this rom?
Ziyan said:
I hope everybody likes the new shiny unified forum section! There's still a bit of a work left to do, but I think it looks great and eases maintaining the threads; blame me if you think otherwise :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Ziyan,
I'm glad you mentioned this, as I thought that I was going insane this morning (or just slightly more insane than usual).
Just browsing the new "Unified" forum (to verify my subscriptions) and noticed that the "Dhollmen" threads could be clarified (just like the "Linaro" threads), for example ...
This thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2176563 could be titled: [KERNEL][P51xx][AOSP] Dhollmen Espresso
This thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2183830 could be titled: [KERNEL][P31xx][AOSP] Dhollmen Espresso
Just to avoid confusion (I freely admit that I am easily confused).
Thanks.
@mentat no need to have 2 threads, one is enough now in unified section
I also don't know what your question hast to do with this rom [emoji14]
~ All my work, news etc. on http://andi34.github.io ~
Android-Andi said:
@mentat no need to have 2 threads, one is enough now in unified section
I also don't know what your question hast to do with this rom [emoji14]
~ All my work, news etc. on http://andi34.github.io ~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Andi,
I only suggested renaming the existing "pair" of threads (they both exist in the Unified Forum) ... Just like the "pair" of Linaro threads (that also both exist in the Unified forum).
The download links in (all four) of the threads (mentioned above) link to unique builds on AFH (for both P31xx and P51xx devices) in this forum: http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-tab-2/galaxy-tab-2-unified
@Ziyan, while we're on the subject, the CandySix for P51XX thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-tab-2/10-inch-development/rom-candysix-v1-1-t3331598 should also be moved to the new Unified forum as well (the CandySix for P31xx thread has already been moved).
Sorry for all the edits (I put the blame on OCD).
Thanks.
mentat said:
@Ziyan, while we're on the subject, the CandySix for P51XX thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-tab-2/10-inch-development/rom-candysix-v1-1-t3331598 should also be moved to the new Unified forum as well (the CandySix for P31xx thread has already been moved).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done; I guess this is it then. Like the XDA forum admin said, the best way to handle moving both threads is to move them both to this unified section, and close one of them (preferably the one with the less posts). While we could merge them into one thread, the posts would get all mixed through the other threads posts (because of the date order) and we would lose any sense of a flow in the conversation...
Minimum Custom Recovery version?
@Ziyan @Android-Andi Thanks for bringing new life to this old tabs
Is there any minimum requirement for recovery for flashing this ROM? I'm running pretty old CWM v.6.0.5.1. Is it sufficient?
Hi all:
This is a thread for my alternative LineageOS 14.1 roms for suzuran.
I'm building these roms from time to time for my own needs and I think other people should participate.
Since the "official" development of LineageOS 14.1 has been stopped, I decided to build a new version only if the Android security patch level has been changed or I've changed anything.
Download 2021-07-19
This is a 7z archive with the zip'ed rom and the md5 file in it. Please unpack this archive, copy the included two files somewhere to your device, reboot into TWRP and flash this zip file. Enable zip verification and md5sum checking. Maybe you have to rename the md5 file to *.md5sum; depending on the TWRP version you are using.
Kernel sources
Tree sources
Features:
OS Version: 7.1.2 Nougat
Kernel: Linux 3.10
New: Android security patch level: 5 June 2021
Using sony blob's from stock version 32.4.A.1.54
Important informations:
You should be familiar with general installation of custom roms.
Required for installation: TWRP 3.1.1 (or newer).
OR use my self built TWRP-version 3.5.2!
No need for making a clean install, but sometimes it helps a lot!
This rom is pre-rooted. For those who want to use magisk or any other rooting tool, you can easily remove this by flashing this file.
Use this rom at your own risk! It comes without any warranty! I'm not responsible for any damage! If you don't agree with that, don't try to flash this rom in any way.
Differences between my version and the "official" one:
Kcal Display Driver - Thanks to @GreyLeshy and @Sony user 16
Voltage Control - Thanks to @GreyLeshy and @Sony user 16
OMS-Support - Thanks to @nathanchance
Added F-Droid and UnifiedNLP! If you don't want this, simply de-install it.
I've included some little extensions like changelog and volume adjustment.
I've set maximum speaker volume to a higher value.
I've increased microphone gain.
I've increased all volume steps from 7 to 15.
I've changed the microfone gain to avoid echo in phone calls.
I've enabled data for MMS.
I've enabled MHL.
Not working:
VoLTE, VoWiFi
If you want to use encryption, you have to disable SIM PIN first!
One (last) request: Please don't ask for including any app. I won't do this, because I want to keep this rom as clean as possible.
Changelog
Troubleshooting:
If you're running into an error, please search in this thread if this error is already posted, before you post it again!
If not, I need a LOG to see what went wrong. Without a LOG I can't help you!
A LOG can be fetched by connecting the device with an USB cable to your PC and then by typing these commands line by line:
Code:
adb root
adb shell logcat -b all -d > logcat
Send my this LOG file via PM.
If you think this could be a SELinux related issue, please try to set the device to permissive mode first.
If the issue is gone, I need the policy file too (plus LOG). Fetch it by typing this line in a terminal:
Code:
adb pull /sys/fs/selinux/policy
If you stuck in a bootloop you can fetch a LOG with this trick:
Press the power button and the volume up button together until the device shuts down.
HOLD the power button.
Release the volume up button and press the volume down button immediately after releasing the volmue up button.
The device should start into TWRP recovery.
Tap on "Advanced", then on "Terminal" and enter these commands line by line:
Code:
cd sys/fs/pstore
cp * /sdcard
Send me the copied file(s), if any, via PM.
Nice
Berni-0815 said:
Hi @all:
First of all, please excuse my bad english... :angel:
They said I should create my own thread for my alternative LineageOS 14.1 roms for suzuran. Here it is.
I'm building these roms from time to time for my own needs and I think other people should participate.
Download
Kernel sources
Tree sources
OS Version: 7.1.2 Nougat
Kernel: Linux 3.10
Required for installation: TWRP 3.1.1
Important informations:
You should be familiar with general installation of alternative roms.
I've included some little extensions like changelog and volume adjustment.
There is no need to make a clean install, but sometimes it helps a lot!
Use it at your own risk!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi ! It would be great if u put out the advantage of yours vs with the official LOS
Berni i said before and i m saying again please make this topic a lineage based rom..
İnclude minimal app for google play store.
And maybe can add substratum inside.. or can be a default diffefent theme ..
I believe you can..
Thx bro.
ROBNX85 said:
Hi ! It would be great if u put out the advantage of yours vs with the official LOS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I wrote: "I've included some little extensions like changelog and volume adjustment."
emosis said:
İnclude minimal app for google play store.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I said a few days before: I don't want to include gapps! If somebody wants to use gapps, feel free to flash them separately. You can download them here. You need arm64 and 7.1 for suzuran.
And maybe can add substratum inside..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Substratum support is not longer available, because the devs have stopped their development for Nougat since august.
Berni-0815 said:
As I wrote: "I've included some little extensions like changelog and volume adjustment."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Add a basic ad-blocker too ?
Berni-0815 said:
As I said a few days before: I don't want to include gapps! If somebody wants to use gapps, feel free to flash them separately. You can download them here. You need arm64 and 7.1 for suzuran.
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree gapps should not be included. It is easy enough to just flash it right after flashing the rom
I am thinking about official vs rom, I think the two roms are probably nearly identical. Probably the most important factor will be the frequency of updates.
PeppeBove said:
Add a basic ad-blocker too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use AdAway which is an open source host list based ad blocker. See https://adaway.org
PeppeBove said:
Add a basic ad-blocker too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see a reason to bake something into the ROM when there are many apps that can do it.
I think something like Xposed-type tweaks being put into settings would be more appropriate. Alleviating the need for xposed. But I don't think it makes sense to load random apps into the ROM.
New version; please have a look at the first post
Berni-0815 said:
New version; please have a look at the first post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome work, thank you so much! Flashing it now.
Just 1 question - do you know if encryption works on your builds?
I've never tried it. I've not so good experience with encryption on a stock rom; so I've decided not to use this feature at all!
Hi Bernhard.
Thanks for your hard work!
i have a question for you.... As i understand it you take all the changes/updates from the offifcial lienage and implement them into your own build. And add the changes as described in post 1.
Am i right about this?
I think that battery life is bad on the official compaired to the version you do.
Do you add battery improvements in your build?
Thanks in advance.
Torben 5247
torben5247 said:
Thanks for your hard work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, it is not so hard to do this, but, thank you! Sometimes I have to search a few hours or try (and revert) something, but in the end I've gotten everything to work as I like it to work.
As i understand it you take all the changes/updates from the offifcial lienage and implement them into your own build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using the LineageOS repositories from github as they are, that's right. I don't use my own repo's; nzzane is doing this AFAIK (Klick). A few weeks ago I'm using other repo's, because LineageOS had bad (will say: not working) sources for our devices.
And add the changes as described in post 1.
Am i right about this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes! :good: One or two of my changes should be implemented into the "official" builds, but until now I don't understand how to use "commitments". Maybe in a few days... :angel:
I think that battery life is bad on the official compaired to the version you do.
Do you add battery improvements in your build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Nothing like this.
On my own device battery life is about three days...
Hi,
PeppeBove said:
Add a basic ad-blocker too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
emosis said:
İnclude minimal app for google play store.
And maybe can add substratum inside..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like other persons, I don't want to have a lot of applications include in the rom. I want to choose the ones I use. This is one reason that made me come to alternative rom.
Another reason is that Lineage use less google s"hit" than stock rom.
So if you have the vision of more app and google stuff include, you better stay on stock. Alternative Roms offers me more freedom; but that's just my opinion...
This is prerooted? There are some of us out there that need to install certain apps before rooting.
Cerhio said:
This is prerooted?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
Berni-0815 said:
One or two of my changes should be implemented into the "official" builds, but until now I don't understand how to use "commitments".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've just committed three of my changes. We'll see if they will be merged...
Berni-0815 said:
I've just committed three of my changes. We'll see if they will be merged...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The brightness settings? I hope so
What else?
Berni-0815 said:
I've just committed three of my changes. We'll see if they will be merged...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's so great to hear, let's hope they get accepted.
Huge thank you for keeping this device alive Berni!
New build up at sx.ix5.org, use version 2018-10-30.
Changelog here: https://sx.ix5.org/changelog.html
Install guide: Flashing AOSP on Xperia XZ
XDA:DevDB Information
AOSP Pie based on Sony Open Devices Project, ROM for the Sony Xperia XZ
Contributors
local__hero, fastbooking, oshmoun
Source Code: https://git.ix5.org/felix/local-manifests-ix5/src/branch/ix5-customizations
ROM OS Version: 9.x Pie
ROM Kernel: Linux 4.x
ROM Firmware Required: .184 / .192
Based On: AOSP
Version Information
Status: Nightly
Created 2018-11-09
Last Updated 2019-05-17
Reporting bugs
Important: Read the bug list before posting. Anyone can add bugs to the list, just follow the rules.
If you have questions, ask them in this thread: Xperia XZ Pie ROMs Questions and Answers Thread
Don't make me ask you for logs every time!
I will repeat the rules again here:
Rules:
New bugs must include version where error popped up and which oem version you are using
Only reproducible errors
Should include adb logcat (linked in a pastebin service like https://del.dog)
Must include clear description what is wrong
If it is a visual/SystemUI bug, only report it here
If it is an internal bug(e.g. fingerprint crashes device), report it to the Sony bugtracker as well!
Always try to fix the bug yourself first! Then submit a pull request to Sony
Must search if error has already been reported (bug tracker, this document, dev buglist)
If you've reported the issue somewhere else already and just want to track it here as well, add a link
Before reporting a bug, always make sure to isolate it. That means, wipe everything, install only the ROM without GApps and Magisk and see if the problem still exists. Only then report the bug!
---
If you have questions, ask them in this thread: Xperia XZ Pie ROMs Questions and Answers Thread
---
In 9.11
1. Everything still works
2. Charging with plugged at screen off works
3. On gcam portrait mode and night photo gives purple glitched image
And phone seems to be faster.
Bug: 9.11 with oem v2- Clean install
- Hotspot not working
- Phone call issue - Mic and speaker not working, cannot hear anything or say anything << Listed in the bug
- Top speaker not working
Still testing.
An update
Yes, we know calling is kinda broken right now on both oem versions. Yes, we know you have problems with dualsim devices because you didn't flash the dualsim patcher. Yes, battery life isn't very good because we are testing out some increased CPU frequencies so video doesn't stutter. (you can go back to the 11-05 build which has the old CPU freqs and compare).
We're aware of a lot of these issues, and they are all tracked in the current buglist (see post #2).
Development happens mostly in the Sony open devices program, with a few heroic volunteers contributing. Right now, a lot of work is being done to get the current flagships(think XZ2, XZ3) to a semi-stable state, but work for our device is done as well.
You can check progress in the sonyxperiadev repos. E.g. recently, some changes to the telephony HAL integration have been made, see the common device repo.
Why is it taking so long to fix all this?
Sony buys many of their processors from Qualcomm. Lots of stuff in phones is proprietary and covered in patents, and you can only get the source code if you sign an NDA. So even if Sony wanted to, they could not release the source for a lot of things.
See all the files with the name "qti" in them? That's Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. See all the repos named something like "qcom-something-something"? That's Qualcomm.
When there's a problem, we have to report it to Sony, who report it to Qualcomm. This takes time already. And don't forget Qualcomm has suppliers as well, and so on and so on. The same is true for other parts, e.g. the Wi-Fi chips are from Broadcom.
Then, support for hardware stuff is on many levels. A lot of low-level drivers that are driving the hardware are on the /odm partition(the one that the oemv1/v2 blobs get flashed to). Then there is work to be done tweaking the actual hardware abstraction layer(HAL) interfaces that work with these driver blobs. Then there are kernel drivers that can go wrong and mess up. Then it can be a problem somewhere higher up in the Android frameworks. Lots of detective work.
If new blobs from Qualcomm come out, Sony itself needs to do some testing, and then releases a new oem version. It won't just magically work, we need to tweak the SODP vendor side as well. It could be as easy as changing a version to a newer one, but it could also be a lot harder. The sonyxperiadev crew knows what's needed to integrate these new blobs, but it still takes time and testing.
Qualcomm provide the a lot of the source code to work with their hardware and blobs from the higher-level Android side in their CodeAurora forum (CAF) repositories. The relevant changes then get merged into the sonyxperiadev repos and we can test if it works(or if something new is broken...).
For more info, read the Android documentation on hardware etc.
The chip in our phone, the MSM8996, is quite old already(even the SDM845 in the XZ2/3 is already quite old in processor standards). We can be luck that Qualcomm still provides support. But it's not a priority to them, they want to sell new
ones of course. That is also a reason updates can take longer.
Regarding full forced-reboot crashes:
Sadly, as of now, for some people the "/sys/fs/pstore" folder does not get populated after a crash. This is important to diagnose what happened.
You can apply this patch to force a kernel panic on every reboot, but I would recommend that you do
so only if you know what you are doing.
Regarding battery life:
Please install BetterBatteryStats
and find out what is draining the battery.
This could really help us out! But first, make sure you are not running any GApps, because the Google Mobile Services are a massive pile of battery drain.
If you absolutely have to use GApps, please run only the "pico" GApps version!
---
About the posts here:
Like 90% of posts here and in the old thread are full of people who just plain refuse to read, asking how to install or demanding someone help them out with something that has already been answered time and time again. This makes it extremely annoying for the us who have to scroll through pages of useless stuff to find the genuine bug reports. You do realize this site is literally named "xda-developers", right? If you're unclear on the concept, please read this: https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=16682226&postcount=2441
"This doesn't work!" - "This thing crashes!" - That gives us almost no clue what is happening. We need logs, or we can't do anything about it. I have only one phone, and I only use the stock ROM. There are a lot of nice testers who send others and me helpful bug reports, with detailed explanations in what circumstances it occured, with proper logs.
With that info, the Sony open devices team and us can actually look into issues.
So please, if something doesn't work AND we are not aware of it yet, post it to the bug list (not here!) and attach a link to a log that you uploaded, e.g. to a service like hastebin.com.
nhicko95 said:
how is battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Test it out, please. And don't forget to report the diagnosed battery stats.
DarkPrinciple said:
I should be able to get to 12 lunch with my battery being more than 50%
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tweaked for more performance right now, but you can use 11-05 to get old CPU freqs. Also, please help hunt down what is draining the battery, it's most likely too many held wakelocks, but it could be any number of things.
bihslk said:
So what is the latest and best working version of this rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's literally in the first post.
bihslk said:
Rom is pretty OK but really annoying top speaker bug. Only lower one works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is already in the bug list. Please read the bug list before posting.
Update 2018-11-16
Some new developments are happening.
Oem binaries version 3 are out. This should give improved power management. The SODP team has also worked on getting audio handling during calls to work. A big thanks to oshmoun for his work on the audio manager. This change was introduced on the 11-15 build. The issue of no call audio when a bluetooth headset is connected is still present as of now.
Changed IRQ handling (PR by Angelo/"kholk"). This should give better battery life and maybe faster wakeup from deep sleep. But could also lead to instabilities and crashes. Send logs & pstore, see post #2. This change was introduced on the 11-15 build.
Testing kernel 4.9.137 i in progress (we are currently on .103). This means stability and security enhancements from upstream linux. Thanks to Nathan Chance who opened this pull request..
But some of those upstream changes might be incompatible with our Sony kernel, so we have to test that. Send logs & pstore, see post #2. This change was introduced in the 11-16 build. If the 11-15 and 11-16 builds are unstable, revert to an older one. But please be brave and run them for at least a day to get us logs of potential crashes.
---
optixperiaa said:
I am always confused about "flash latest stock ftf" part about roms as a newbie.. if we flash sony's ftf how can we flash rom ? isnt it overwrite ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your phone software is made up of many layers. The ROMs like omni or this AOSP-based one only modify your /system and /boot partitions.
But when you update your stock firmware via flashtool, you also update your phone modem firmware, your qnovo charging controller firmware, your lower-level bootloaders etc. That is why we instruct you to update to the latest stock firmware. You could theoretically skip flashing /system in flashtool(because it will get overwritten anyway, as you've already discovered) and directly flash a custom ROM afterwards.
When you're coming from omni, there is no need to flash stock firmware again in between, because your other partitions stay the same. Just a new /oem is needed.
viori said:
flash omni_kagura-2018-11-20_UNOFFICIAL_TESTBUILD-2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, please keep this thread about development for AOSP. The omni builds are not meant for you.
If you have trouble installing then simply don't use it.
DO NOT POST HERE FOR HELP OR YOU WILL BE REPORTED. Read everything before posting.
If you have questions, ask them in this thread: AOSP 9.0 Pie builds for F8331/F8332
The OP has requested that you do not post questions in this thread, please use the thread he states in the OP to do that.
If you have questions, ask them in this thread: AOSP 9.0 Pie builds for F8331/F8332
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Thread cleaned
General update
Newer builds will have selinux set to "enforcing". Most denials should have been fixed or are irrelevant. If you encounter any problems, selinux-related or anything else, please report them to the Sony bugtracker or - even better - submit a pull request to the selinux-policy repo.
Update 1: vendor blobs aren't binderized correctly atm, so no network. You can set selinux back to permissive to fix most issues atm.
The Wi-Fi hotspot has been fixed thanks to oshmoun. In newer builds, it should be using less battery.
Next thing we're going to tackle is deep sleep and battery drain. Big pain point and one of the last blockers, apart from the camera and bluetooth in-call audio.
You might have noticed that the omnirom device trees have been updated to 9.0. Nightly testing builds work fine, but they have the same issues as the AOSP-based ones.
Work is also under way to get a Pie-based TWRP recovery stable, with support for FDE encryption(this means that you will be able to back up your encrypted installations). Mounting /userdata works, but the builds are not ready for public release yet.
Update
New build up (2018-12-08)
Camera key works
Update to December security patch(12-05, r21)
Fingerprint should not crash device on enrollment any more
Allow setting lower minimum brightness
Double-tap-to-wake off by default(but can be enabled)
Plugging in charger with screen off should be fixed
Once again, I invite anyone who would like to help out or just learn a bit about building and tweaking to take a look at the sources posted here.
There will be a guide on how to build only the kernel and experiment with a custom boot.img shortly.
The build guide on sx.ix5.org for reproducing these AOSP builds should bring you up to speed, and if you need help building or just want to chat, the telegram group in post #1 is open to you.
local__hero said:
New build up (2018-12-08)
Camera key works
Update to December security patch(12-05, r21)
Fingerprint should not crash device on enrollment any more
Allow setting lower minimum brightness
Double-tap-to-wake off by default(but can be enabled)
Plugging in charger with screen off should be fixed
Once again, I invite anyone who would like to help out or just learn a bit about building and tweaking to take a look at the sources posted here.
There will be a guide on how to build only the kernel and experiment with a custom boot.img shortly.
The build guide on sx.ix5.org for reproducing these AOSP builds should bring you up to speed, and if you need help building or just want to chat, the telegram group in post #1 is open to you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great job.
I already built a custom Pie kernel about a week ago to gain better performance but the charging bug was driving me insane :crying:
I guess now's the time to go back to the mighty Pie and try building a nice and hopefully stable Marrow Kernel.
Cheers
Finally a new build is out!
I can't pass safety net on latest build.
Any ideas what should I use ?
Since modules for spoofing fingerprint simply don't work.
I tried universal safety net fix but with no avail.
V 12.15
Charging working fine. But i have problem with camera, photos are very dark.
Sometimes touch screen not working and i need to switch the screen and on again.
ov2rey said:
Sometimes touch screen not working and i need to switch the screen and on again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Disable Dt2w
oem v4 is out
DahakePL said:
Disable Dt2w
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you It's work!
Layns said:
oem v4 is out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i am testing v4 on latest build aosp_f8331_2018-12-21-NIGHTLY-permissive.
Screen unable to display after update to oem v4
https://developer.sony.com/file/download/software-binaries-for-aosp-pie-android-9-0-kernel-4-9-tone/
ov2rey said:
Thank you It's work!
i am testing v4 on latest build aosp_f8331_2018-12-21-NIGHTLY-permissive.
Screen unable to display after update to oem v4
https://developer.sony.com/file/download/software-binaries-for-aosp-pie-android-9-0-kernel-4-9-tone/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried it works fine but the camera sucks and the sound is bad, the screen opening with double tap is running slow, the charge is a little quick
If you have come across this thread you probably want a ROM that provides better security than what AOSP provides
You have 3 ROMs actually:
1) Official grapheneos (can run with locked bootloader)
2) Unofficial grapheneos (I haven't released the keys to lock the bootloader on purpose as these are highly experimental builds that test features before they land in grapheneos)
3) glassrom (these are private builds I use for myself. Not possible to lock bootloader as I build them for myself. There will be no support provided for glassrom but the stability should be pretty good and there won't be any serious bugs)
1) Installing official grapheneos
Ask for support in grapheneos IRC/official matrix. Check grapheneos.org
Important! Lately there has been a lot of spam and off topic on grapheneos IRC. Please be on topic and keep the discussion about grapheneos. Please read the grapheneos FAQ before asking questions. Starting discussions unrelated to grapheneos or spreading misinformation will definitely get you banned. Please do not do so as this wastes time of the developers.
Bugs must be reported on the os_issue_tracker on the github. Include the steps to reproduce, a log and a dmesg. Include the exact build of grapheneos as well. Reporting bugs with a modified version of grapheneos (that is, flash grapheneos and only grapheneos, nothing else) will get your report closed. See if your issue has already been opened by someone else. Do not ask for apps to be included by default on grapheneos. Read the FAQ before requesting features
If you are unsure, ask in the glassrom support group at https://t.me/glassrom and we'll redirect you to the appropriate place. That will save both your and our time. Remember to only ask about the pixel 4, for other devices you must head to the grapheneos IRC and follow the rules carefully
Follow the official installation instructions https://grapheneos.org/install
Lock your bootloader
You're done
All sources, including kernel sources are here. The build script has the exact defconfig used
https://github.com/GrapheneOS
2) unofficial grapheneos:
Ask for support in glassrom chat. https://t.me/glassrom
Kernel sources follow the same format as grapheneos and are here: https://github.com/GlassROM-devices/kernel_google_coral
Please join the telegram report or provide active feedback if you're on these builds
Go to https://github.com/GlassROM/glassrom-landing/releases
Prerelease builds are grapheneos
Download both files and verify them against glassrom-verification
Be on the latest bootloader and run:
Code:
fastboot update fastboot-image-bootable-only.zip
If you're not on the latest bootloader the bootloader is actually bundled in the update. Extract the bootable only zip and flash the boot.img to boot partition.
Use the volume buttons to select reboot recovery regardless of how you flashed it and then boot to recovery
Format data
Sideload the zip with adb sideload
Reboot
3) Glassrom
Ask for support o- you don't ask for support
Glassrom is a lineage build that provides the grapheneos patchset
Sources and flash instructions are the same as unofficial grapheneos
Use it if you miss lineage on your pixel 4 for some reason
Go to https://github.com/GlassROM/glassrom-landing/releases
All releases for pixel 4 are glassrom
Glassrom has a couple additional features:
Targeted optimization for pixel 4 CPU
An exfat driver
Forced 90 hz display
Everything you'd expect from lineageos
Fdsan is enforcing
Happy flashing
I'm assuming glassrom has no gapps? Or does it?
dpryor88 said:
I'm assuming glassrom has no gapps? Or does it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no support for them at the time of writing. Even if I bundle them right now you'll have to go through hoops to get it working like registering your device ID with google and so on
You are right about being carefull locking the bootloader, I forgot to unlock the bootloader of a device before formatting and now it's resting in peace. Oem unlock not possible due to no recovery and no OS, only fastboot.
trancinguy said:
You are right about being carefull locking the bootloader, I forgot to unlock the bootloader of a device before formatting and now it's resting in peace. Oem unlock not possible due to no recovery and no OS, only fastboot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
official grapheneos goes through a lot of testing so locking the bootloader is safe. the others? at least not yet
theres 1 more calyx os
Have you guys been able to run banking apps on any of the OS's??
markmywordz said:
theres 1 more calyx os
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running DU, no problems at all. ?
BrainStormCEO said:
I'm running DU, no problems at all. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have u lock ur bootloader after flashing du
markmywordz said:
have u lock ur bootloader after flashing du
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I don't want to ever do that.
Guys this is a reminder. While OT is allowed this is a thread about grapheneos and glassrom. Please do not bring discussions about other ROMs into this thread
Next time I won't be this polite
Hi, i`m considering buying pixel 4 to move to graphenOS(currently s10e with LOS), but i can't find anywhere info what screen unlock functions does it support from the box. As it doesn't have fingerprint sensor, is face unlock realised anyhow, or the only possibility is password? Thanks!
face unlock is not secure, a picture of or someone that looks like you can unlock.
I was asking about other thing. If there is no finherprint sensor how is realised unlocking: pattern, password, face unlock or maybe there some other workarounds, i need to know becouse i use keepass with fingerprint autenitication(original password is 64 symbols long.
I know that original face unlock is google proprietary, but i have seen allready some open source code for it, so maybe there is secure solutiin allready.
With right face unlock you cannot unlock it with picture, maybe on very old phone with first attempts, pixel 4 as i know has 1 or 2 IR Scanners+front camera, to it can surely get the depth and layers, so with pucture it shoud be impossible to unlock, maybe with 3d head print in theory, but definitly not with picture, and scanners shoud be able to read eye fingerprint, like apple devices do
how's about battery life?
Does this ROM support VoLte and WiFi Calling?