Related
I have rooted my N6 via adb, the supersu .bat file, TWRP, and the Nexus Toolkit. No matter what I do, after restoring my N6 and rebooting, I lose the NFC options under settings. If I do a factory reset I regain the options, but when I re-flash root I lose them again. NFC writing programs can't detect NFC ability on my phone, and ztest says I don't have it.
I am running the stock factory image.
NFC works fine before I root. I have rooted every Android device I've had, and never experienced this. Is this an N6 issue, a lollipop issue, or some special circumstance of my own creating?
Has anyone else experienced this?
TIA.
goodfellaslxa said:
I have rooted my N6 via adb, the supersu .bat file, TWRP, and the Nexus Toolkit. No matter what I do, after restoring my N6 and rebooting, I lose the NFC options under settings. If I do a factory reset I regain the options, but when I re-flash root I lose them again. NFC writing programs can't detect NFC ability on my phone, and ztest says I don't have it.
I am running the stock factory image.
NFC works fine before I root. I have rooted every Android device I've had, and never experienced this. Is this an N6 issue, a lollipop issue, or some special circumstance of my own creating?
Has anyone else experienced this?
TIA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rooted, and unlocked via NTK here. NFC works fine.
goodfellaslxa said:
I have rooted my N6 via adb, the supersu .bat file, TWRP, and the Nexus Toolkit. No matter what I do, after restoring my N6 and rebooting, I lose the NFC options under settings. If I do a factory reset I regain the options, but when I re-flash root I lose them again. NFC writing programs can't detect NFC ability on my phone, and ztest says I don't have it.
I am running the stock factory image.
NFC works fine before I root. I have rooted every Android device I've had, and never experienced this. Is this an N6 issue, a lollipop issue, or some special circumstance of my own creating?
Has anyone else experienced this?
TIA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what are you using to gain root? the latest supersu should not mess things up. the latest supersu is version 2.37 http://download.chainfire.eu/636/SuperSU/UPDATE-SuperSU-v2.37.zip
I've had no problems at all. I used the wugfresh toolkit over in the development section. Worked flawlessly and was pretty much the easiest root I've ever used. You just click buttons. Lol. Go back to full stock and use that.
I have used Wug's toolkit, and agree it's very easy. I have also tried every other method. I have only flashed the stock rom. Maybe it's something that's loading afterwards? Are any apps known to kill NFC? I literally lose the option to enable NFC (and also Android beam). It's just not there.
My process has been 1. Flash stock rom. 2. Restore from Google. 3. Flash root. Sometime after flashing root (and making sure I still have NFC) it disappears.
Again, I have rooted many phones over the years, and never had this problem. I am going to have to try to diagnose what step exactly causes me to lose NFC. I reflashed yesterday and had NFC, but today it's gone again.
I don't think I'm doing anything out of the ordinary, so I will post IF I find the culprit. I doubt I will be the only one to experience this.
goodfellaslxa said:
I have used Wug's toolkit, and agree it's very easy. I have also tried every other method. I have only flashed the stock rom. Maybe it's something that's loading afterwards? Are any apps known to kill NFC? I literally lose the option to enable NFC (and also Android beam). It's just not there.
My process has been 1. Flash stock rom. 2. Restore from Google. 3. Flash root. Sometime after flashing root (and making sure I still have NFC) it disappears.
Again, I have rooted many phones over the years, and never had this problem. I am going to have to try to diagnose what step exactly causes me to lose NFC. I reflashed yesterday and had NFC, but today it's gone again.
I don't think I'm doing anything out of the ordinary, so I will post IF I find the culprit. I doubt I will be the only one to experience this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
again, ill repeat myself, what file are you using to gain root? if you are using older files, they break things.
simms22 said:
again, ill repeat myself, what file are you using to gain root? if you are using older files, they break things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used 2.36. I'll try 2.37 to see if it makes a difference.
goodfellaslxa said:
I used 2.36. I'll try 2.37 to see if it makes a difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it doesnt matter, 2.36 is still good. the only thing i can tell you is root your phone the right way. you want to fastboot oem unlock the bootloader first, then fastboot flash a custom recovery, then flash the the supersu file via that recovery, then just reboot.
simms22 said:
it doesnt matter, 2.36 is still good. the only thing i can tell you is root your phone the right way. you want to fastboot oem unlock the bootloader first, then fastboot flash a custom recovery, then flash the the supersu file via that recovery, then just reboot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there an issue with the following method?
fastboot oem unlock
chainfire's autoroot in stock recovery
Just trying to understand if there is a reason why I should do it a different way. At this time, I don't need custom recovery (all I want root for at the moment is adaway - and that is working fine). I suspect i will end up flashing TWRP in the near future (when I need it).
jj14 said:
Is there an issue with the following method?
fastboot oem unlock
chainfire's autoroot in stock recovery
Just trying to understand if there is a reason why I should do it a different way. At this time, I don't need custom recovery (all I want root for at the moment is adaway - and that is working fine). I suspect i will end up flashing TWRP in the near future (when I need it).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, there very well could be. doing it right is just as easy as using any root toolkit, its a nexus and has the options to do it manually, no hacking. if you have the drivers to your computer installed, it takes about 3-4 minutes.
simms22 said:
yes, there very well could be. doing it right is just as easy as using any root toolkit, its a nexus and has the options to do it manually, no hacking. if you have the drivers to your computer installed, it takes about 3-4 minutes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Till Lollipop, I've always done it the manual way. With lollipop on my N5 and then, on my N6, the sticky's here didn't seem to provide any different method - it was autoroot.
Reading other threads showed that it was either custom kernel with relaxed permissions and supersu, or autoroot, or the toolkit.
I know that chainfire was testing a version of supersu that wouldn't need the modified kernel, but it was still in beta.
So, what method would you have recommended? (which did you use?) SuperSU by itself isn't sufficient (unless you went with the beta). Or is there a different guide/sticky thread that I missed?
jj14 said:
Till Lollipop, I've always done it the manual way. With lollipop on my N5 and then, on my N6, the sticky's here didn't seem to provide any different method - it was autoroot.
Reading other threads showed that it was either custom kernel with relaxed permissions and supersu, or autoroot, or the toolkit.
I know that chainfire was testing a version of supersu that wouldn't need the modified kernel, but it was still in beta.
So, what method would you have recommended? (which did you use?) SuperSU by itself isn't sufficient (unless you went with the beta). Or is there a different guide/sticky thread that I missed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i recommend the way i did it, the right way. fastboot oem unlock, fastboot flash a recovery, and flash the latest supersu. what you are reading is now considered old. flashing the new supersu(beta) is all thats needed.
simms22 said:
i recommend the way i did it, the right way. fastboot oem unlock, fastboot flash a recovery, and flash the latest supersu. what you are reading is now considered old. flashing the new supersu(beta) is all thats needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I'll try it when the next update comes along. Get system partition back to stock by flashing appropriate system images, and then using the new supersu.
jj14 said:
I guess I'll try it when the next update comes along. Get system partition back to stock by flashing appropriate system images, and then using the new supersu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh, i almost forgot. the n6 has a new option, before unlocking the bootloader, you have to go to developer settings and enable oem unlock.
simms22 said:
oh, i almost forgot. the n6 has a new option, before unlocking the bootloader, you have to go to developer settings and enable oem unlock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Yeah, I knew that (I already unlocked bootloader and rooted)
Well, after reflashing and not rooting I still lost NFC (though it took several hours and a few reboots before it stopped), so I decided to try not using google restore, and setup as a new device.
After manually reinstalling 300+ apps, reconfiguring everything, and rooting (using 2.37), NFC appears to be working fine. I *think* that some setting that was being restored from previous google backups eventually killed NFC.
I'm not rooted... stock T-Mobile Nexus 6 running a nano SIM from my Droid Maxx on VZW. There are no NFC settings in the Wireless settings section.
I'm not unlocked or rooted... just took the over the air update that came right after the phone first powered up.
Is the nano SIM a factor? What exactly is the difference between the NFC nano SIM and the non-NFC nano SIM? The Droid Maxx has NFC, so I assume that its nano SIM supports NFC. Not sure what's going on here.
lkevinl said:
I'm not rooted... stock T-Mobile Nexus 6 running a nano SIM from my Droid Maxx on VZW. There are no NFC settings in the Wireless settings section.
I'm not unlocked or rooted... just took the over the air update that came right after the phone first powered up.
Is the nano SIM a factor? What exactly is the difference between the NFC nano SIM and the non-NFC nano SIM? The Droid Maxx has NFC, so I assume that its nano SIM supports NFC. Not sure what's going on here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think its not a root issue. Did you restore a previous backup, or use the tap-to-import option? I think there is a setting that is being imported that causes this. Try resetting to stock, and when you go through the initial setup don't import a backup. That fixed it for me.
I used the original auto-root, and I still have NFC options available also. (and I never had to enable developer options. I unlocked the bootloader right out of the box).
Hmmm... was hoping to avoid doing the factory reset. I did try to the Tap to Go option but wasn't sure if it did anything. I'm mostly interested in getting my WiFi settings restored. I suspect your right about a restored setting mucking this up. I may have to do the reset anyway because of the other problem I'm having with Facebook that I posted about in an earlier thread.
Hey,
Wondering if somebody could help me out. I purchased a Telus HTC Desire 510. The bootloader has been unlocked, TWRP installed, SuperSU root access. I installed Titanium Backup. I uninstalled system software such as Twitter, Facebook, services etc, and have noticed that when I restart the phone, the software comes back.
Can someone explain to me why the O.S. is doing this? It's Android kitkat. I have noticed in any file manager that it defaults to and emulated folder etc //sdcard/emulated. Also thinking it might have something to do with HTC software pre-installed //dumby proof backup software? In the past on any Android device, after unlocking and rooting I've never had this problem. Starting to fumble me...
Thanks
rcatania31_ said:
Hey,
Wondering if somebody could help me out. I purchased a Telus HTC Desire 510. The bootloader has been unlocked, TWRP installed, SuperSU root access. I installed Titanium Backup. I uninstalled system software such as Twitter, Facebook, services etc, and have noticed that when I restart the phone, the software comes back.
Can someone explain to me why the O.S. is doing this? It's Android kitkat. I have noticed in any file manager that it defaults to and emulated folder etc //sdcard/emulated. Also thinking it might have something to do with HTC software pre-installed //dumby proof backup software? In the past on any Android device, after unlocking and rooting I've never had this problem. Starting to fumble me...
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, unfortunately I cannot help you at the moment but I will try to look up your problem. In the mean time, can you please create a stock backup from your ROM and make it available. This would be very helpful for many of us how are working on the VM / Sprint version of this device. Thanks in advance.
moh19814 said:
Hi, unfortunately I cannot help you at the moment but I will try to look up your problem. In the mean time, can you please create a stock backup from your ROM and make it available. This would be very helpful for many of us how are working on the VM / Sprint version of this device. Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey,
Thanks for the reply. I created a backup with TWRP, approx. size 2.5GB unzipped in a folder a few days ago. I will try to get it online /zipped/compressed I geuss to a reasonable size.
I do see your VM/Sprint roms available. Unsure whether to try them as it's a different carrier? Telus runs on GSM LTE 4 1700/2100Mhz band 4. Could always revert back but I don't want to wreck the phone.
A great little phone. Still very new.
I see some roms say ''write protection removed'. Would this have something to do with the stock software coming back on boot? Ie . facebook etc. I always assumed having SU rights basically removes write protection. Who knows.
rcatania31_ said:
Hey,
Thanks for the reply. I created a backup with TWRP, approx. size 2.5GB unzipped in a folder a few days ago. I will try to get it online /zipped/compressed I geuss to a reasonable size.
I do see your VM/Sprint roms available. Unsure whether to try them as it's a different carrier? Telus runs on GSM LTE 4 1700/2100Mhz band 4. Could always revert back but I don't want to wreck the phone.
A great little phone. Still very new.
I see some roms say ''write protection removed'. Would this have something to do with the stock software coming back on boot? Ie . facebook etc. I always assumed having SU rights basically removes write protection. Who knows.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since there is no S-OFF for this device, you'll need a kernel with write-protection removed... That's why the apps you remove keep reappearing upon reboot.
Surj138 said:
Since there is no S-OFF for this device, you'll need a kernel with write-protection removed... That's why the apps you remove keep reappearing upon reboot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the response. I went ahead and flashed the Cricket kernel on the device and it worked. Being a Telus device it seems to make no difference. I will check and make sure 4G LTE still works - if the kernel even has anything to do with it?
Glad this worked as there is a tonne of garbage on these phones that I'd like to get rid of. I might go ahead and try a custom rom - with the HTC software removed - as it seems to cause some issues when removing (htc software) from Titanium Backup.
Question as I'm curious- has anyone figured out a way to unlock the governor for the CPU/GPU. I think this config would be a prime candidate to mild overclocking.
rcatania31_ said:
Thanks for the response. I went ahead and flashed the Cricket kernel on the device and it worked. Being a Telus device it seems to make no difference. I will check and make sure 4G LTE still works - if the kernel even has anything to do with it?
Glad this worked as there is a tonne of garbage on these phones that I'd like to get rid of. I might go ahead and try a custom rom - with the HTC software removed - as it seems to cause some issues when removing (htc software) from Titanium Backup.
Question as I'm curious- has anyone figured out a way to unlock the governor for the CPU/GPU. I think this config would be a prime candidate to mild overclocking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I do not think so, but I am not 100% sure. So far, for Cricket Kernel with Write Protection Removed v1.0, Ondemand was set as default governor and all Stock Governors was Enabled.
rcatania31_ said:
Hey,
Wondering if somebody could help me out. I purchased a Telus HTC Desire 510. The bootloader has been unlocked, TWRP installed, SuperSU root access. I installed Titanium Backup. I uninstalled system software such as Twitter, Facebook, services etc, and have noticed that when I restart the phone, the software comes back.
Can someone explain to me why the O.S. is doing this? It's Android kitkat. I have noticed in any file manager that it defaults to and emulated folder etc //sdcard/emulated. Also thinking it might have something to do with HTC software pre-installed //dumby proof backup software? In the past on any Android device, after unlocking and rooting I've never had this problem. Starting to fumble me...
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The TELUS device is GSM, so likely the Cricket Kernel with write-protection removed will help you. Look under Android Development for it.
Sorry all.. realized this was a solved thread.
Did you install a Write Protect removed Kernel/image? That could be the reason. By the way, would you happen to have a TWRP stock backup that you make available for us? We're trying to get the VM/Sprint variant running on a GSM network, but so far we have not been very successful.
rcatania31_ said:
Hey,
Wondering if somebody could help me out. I purchased a Telus HTC Desire 510. The bootloader has been unlocked, TWRP installed, SuperSU root access. I installed Titanium Backup. I uninstalled system software such as Twitter, Facebook, services etc, and have noticed that when I restart the phone, the software comes back.
Can someone explain to me why the O.S. is doing this? It's Android kitkat. I have noticed in any file manager that it defaults to and emulated folder etc //sdcard/emulated. Also thinking it might have something to do with HTC software pre-installed //dumby proof backup software? In the past on any Android device, after unlocking and rooting I've never had this problem. Starting to fumble me...
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
rcatania31_ said:
Hey,
Thanks for the reply. I created a backup with TWRP, approx. size 2.5GB unzipped in a folder a few days ago. I will try to get it online /zipped/compressed I geuss to a reasonable size.
I do see your VM/Sprint roms available. Unsure whether to try them as it's a different carrier? Telus runs on GSM LTE 4 1700/2100Mhz band 4. Could always revert back but I don't want to wreck the phone.
A great little phone. Still very new.
I see some roms say ''write protection removed'. Would this have something to do with the stock software coming back on boot? Ie . facebook etc. I always assumed having SU rights basically removes write protection. Who knows.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I would like to check if you had some time to get your Telus TWRP backup online or not yet. Thanks in advance.
moh19814 said:
Hi, I would like to check if you had some time to get your Telus TWRP backup online or not yet. Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ill do it if you are still looking for it
I just ordered this phone and had some questions:
Will Nova launcher work on it?
Has anyone use Titanium Backup to restore user apps?
Thanks
Nova works great. I haven't used Titanium Backup yet, but no reason why it shouldn't work. I believe others have reported using it in these forums with no problems.
Be careful not to let it update automatically, or you won't be able to root, remove ads, or flash anything. Do not connect to wifi or phone network until after you have disabled updates.
yaconsult said:
Be careful not to let it update automatically, or you won't be able to root, remove ads, or flash anything. Do not connect to wifi or phone network until after you have disabled updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do I disable updates?
The safest way is to just not put in your phone service's network SIM and don't configure it to connect to your wifi network. The first thing I did with mine was to follow Colton's excellent instructions to flash it to non-Prime, unlock, root it, and install twrp.
Agree with the no network until you confirm its either already been updated and not able to get Amazon off it, or strip it down before it gets online. Mine came out of the box, skip through setup, check version, rom and root and debloat, reboot, shut down, then sim card and wifi.
Did that to my new R1 last night and it's running OEM v12 now ad-free. I have a Nexus 6P running Android 7.1 beta so I find Blu 6.0 obsolete. Is Amazon's ROM any better? I would at least like to have 6.01 to get rid of the wifi battery drain bug.
Obsolete is a pretty strong word. It works fine. I'm on android 6.0 and the battery life is acceptable for me. If you need the latest version every minute, you don't get to have a $60 phone.
@gotcha640,there are probably a couple of hundred git commits between Blu 6.0 and the latest AOSP 6.0.1 including security patches which Blu ignores.
I am fine with using Marshmallow instead of Nougat. It's just that I want the latest build. I'd love CM13 nightlies on this $60 phone.
Today i bring you the very first rom for our device.
It's only stock, but the installer includes enough options to keep us happy for a while.
The core installation includes a stripped down system menu with Google play and contacts. I also added, by default, the WiFi fix and hotspot mod. The rest of what you install is your choice.
Aroma options:
Choose which J320 you own
Debloat (fully customizable)
Deknox
Install root
Install busybox
Install Init.d
Install Xposed
Bugs:
None
If you find any let me know, but if you do not wipe, please don't even report bugs.
Link:
Download
Installation:
Flashfire
Enjoy
-D
This uses the same base files for each room, AQG1. So even tho the highest firmware for J320AG is only AQB1 you still get the July security update (minus the new sboot)
All devices are interchangable for me, on Cricket. Depending on your carrier maybe they'll all work for you too.
I have AT&T Samsung Galaxy Express Prime GoPhone, J320A. Owned it for one week. It has been carrier-unlocked. I'm now using T-Mobile SIM. Seems to work OK. Only issue I can find is where the SIM status page does not show my phone number.
I would appreciate pointers or maybe a place to look for installation steps. I assume I'll to need to root via Kingroot then replace with SuperSU (if possible). Then install FlashFire. I have rooted and installed ROMs on other devices (Galaxy Exhibit, 2012 Nexus tablet, Moto G), but seemingly devices are more locked-down these days. I understand that TWRP is not available for this device and likely will not be.
Last year, I bought a couple of inexpensive T-Mobile phones and "rooted" them with KingRoot which is still installed on those phones. (Not really thrilled about that.) I put rooted in quotes because it doesn't quite behave like a fully-rooted phone, IMO. I'm not very expert in these things, but I know how to follow steps and have used ODIN, TWRP, et cetera.
I'm leery of working with these more locked-down phones. Am I being paranoid and/or incorrect about these matters?
BTW, thanks for the ROM! I'm surprised there aren't more replies.
Maybe this phone is not as popular as I think it should be. Maybe it's too low-spec for the tech-savvy crowd. I got mine for just $64 at Walmart online, but they've since raised the price to $79. Seems like a good deal, even at that price.
I paid $15 to carrier-unlock it. I had to flash firmware (modem file?) before unlocking, then flash another file (restored modem?) after unlocking. I was following emailed instructions after the initial unlock procedure failed.
Here's the root thread
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-j3-2016/how-to/root-samsung-sm-j320a-galaxy-express-t3573628
There's a xposed module that does just that, never tried it tho, and of course it's not permanent.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/ga...pp-sim-changer-change-registered-sim-t2106490
I definitely like the phone and yeah, it's a good price.
Being locked does hurt it tho. No easy recovery and no roms from source. The only thing we might get will be ported. And with no kernel, porting is a pain to track down problems... but i like a challenge
My J3 was unlocked out of the box? Still don't quite get the different names for it though. Rooted with infixremix method and worked fi e until its download caused the dialer to crash whenever it was opened. Still trying to sort out the mess I made of this one.
original stock
hey do any of you guys know where I can get the original firmware to restore this device? mine is the S/W: j320aueu1ape9
on the box it says j320x UD
Odin files are posted here
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-j3-2016/how-to/root-samsung-sm-j320a-galaxy-express-t3573628
How is this ROM working out?
Can anyone -- or DamienMc, the creator -- post a review of how this ROM is working out? Brief or long; any type of review would be appreciated.
I'm thinking of trying this ROM and I haven't rooted my phone yet.
Although I did unlock the carrier via a paid unlocker site. I'm using it on T-Mobile with no apparent issues. My phone is stock, of course, except for being carrier-unlocked. …Several questions, if I might:
Are those "extra" AT&T and Samsung accounts present? (ref. screenshot)
Are Samsung factory (i.e.: theme-able) dialer, messaging, and contacts apps installed?
Is it still possible to theme the UI with the Samsung theme installer?
Finally, which bloat icons have been purged? (ref. screenshot) I realize one's idea of bloat may vary from individual.
Any feedback or commentary is welcome. Thank you for your consideration.
could it work on J320H?
i know it's for 320A/Az but i want to try it
danny8 said:
Can anyone -- or DamienMc, the creator -- post a review of how this ROM is working out? Brief or long; any type of review would be appreciated.
Any feedback or commentary is welcome. Thank you for your consideration.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not going to review it (someone else can)
But I used it heavily before I started work on something new.
It's as stable as stock... cause it is stock Nothing tweaked just the few add-ons to let you tweak it easier.
About the bloat.
I did notice I should have left Samsung account (and maybe billing) with the standard install. Because you can't use the theme store without them. But they're in 'bloat'.
You can always install all the debloat options and have 100% deodex stock and edit to your liking.
hamzaeid said:
could it work on J320H?
i know it's for 320A/Az but i want to try it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry bud, different chipset
How do we flash this to our device mainly because twrp and cwm ain't a thing for the j320a. Also I'm using kingroot and I cannot go to su I've tried also flashify does not work either does flashfire how would you go about rooting with su cause I've tried the mrw method and contanstaly it would pop up kinguser has stopped working so do you have another method of rooting the J320A. I just followed the first post about rooting it.
iiFir3z said:
How do we flash this to our device mainly because twrp and cwm ain't a thing for the j320a. Also I'm using kingroot and I cannot go to su I've tried also flashify does not work either does flashfire how would you go about rooting with su cause I've tried the mrw method and contanstaly it would pop up kinguser has stopped working so do you have another method of rooting the J320A. I just followed the first post about rooting it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just rooted my phone with Kingroot and used the mrw method to remove it well keeping my root. after got Su in my terminal emulator, I deleted the kingroot apk not the app itself. then just installed SuperSu thru my play store and been working just fine for me.
gus8347 said:
I just rooted my phone with Kingroot and used the mrw method to remove it well keeping my root. after got Su in my terminal emulator, I deleted the kingroot apk not the app itself. then just installed SuperSu thru my play store and been working just fine for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried that it would just constantly spam me with kinguser has stopped working and that message would constantly spam me so I'm not ever using that way again.
iiFir3z said:
I've tried that it would just constantly spam me with kinguser has stopped working and that message would constantly spam me so I'm not ever using that way again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah i guess i never had kinguser app or apk i had to delete. Was just kingroot apk that i downloaded and used.
iiFir3z said:
I've tried that it would just constantly spam me with kinguser has stopped working and that message would constantly spam me so I'm not ever using that way again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After mrc and kinguser crashes you should have supersu. You need to run that first, let it update the files and then reboot.
If su doesn't even get installed, have the apk ready and install.
Another thing you should make sure your really rooted, reboot after king and recheck.
Also what versions of kingroot and mrw are you using?
iiFir3z said:
I'm using Kingroot and I cannot go to SU. I've tried also Flashify does not work. Either does Flashfire. How would you go about rooting with SU…
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I followed the rooting thread OP directions carefully and had many problems. My initial Kingroot was really ugly and heated the phone. I then attempted to use SuperSU-Me Pro (paid version). It was never able to complete, even after several tries. I struggled using various techniques over many hours. (I did have root with Kingroot.) Nothing would remove Kingroot 5.0.5, and as you probably know, Kingroot won't allow for many apps such as Flashfire. Very frustrating. I probably shortened the life of my phone and battery with all the crap I tried. Many pulls of my battery were needed.
I finally wrested control from Kingroot by uninstalling version 5.0.5 and installing Kingroot 4.5 instead. Then SuperSU-Me Pro did its work. Had I used Kingroot 4.5 from the outset, would things would have gone better? I don't know. The rooting process for this phone is a one-way trip with a dubious outcome. I know the Express Prime is not costly, but if you're risk adverse think twice before trying to root. I suppose you can undo the whole thing, but I haven't tried and likely will not.
Despite the problems I had, I believe using SuperSU-Me Pro was worth the cost and ultimately saved time. I'm glad I rooted my phone, but -- damn, it was a lot of effort compared to previous phones and my tablet.
I have not tried the de-odexed ROM posted in this thread's OP, but it's on my to-do list. I'm kind of afraid of messing with my phone for the time being. I'll post a review if and when I try it out.
For what it's worth, I wasn't able to get my built-in flashlight toggle to work. I ran the fix script via flashfire with no success. Update: Fixed after installing Busybox. Thanks, DamienMc!
danny8 said:
I wasn't able to get my built-in flashlight toggle to work. I ran the fix script via flashfire with no success.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need busybox installed as well
Busybox
Oh, you're very good. It works!
Help! After flashing the rom, it does not let me log in to the google account and I can not exit that screen, the message it displays is as follows:
danny8 said:
I have AT&T Samsung Galaxy Express Prime GoPhone, J320A. Owned it for one week. It has been carrier-unlocked. I'm now using T-Mobile SIM. Seems to work OK. Only issue I can find is where the SIM status page does not show my phone number.
I would appreciate pointers or maybe a place to look for installation steps. I assume I'll to need to root via Kingroot then replace with SuperSU (if possible). Then install FlashFire. I have rooted and installed ROMs on other devices (Galaxy Exhibit, 2012 Nexus tablet, Moto G), but seemingly devices are more locked-down these days. I understand that TWRP is not available for this device and likely will not be.
Last year, I bought a couple of inexpensive T-Mobile phones and "rooted" them with KingRoot which is still installed on those phones. (Not really thrilled about that.) I put rooted in quotes because it doesn't quite behave like a fully-rooted phone, IMO. I'm not very expert in these things, but I know how to follow steps and have used ODIN, TWRP, et cetera.
I'm leery of working with these more locked-down phones. Am I being paranoid and/or incorrect about these matters?
BTW, thanks for the ROM! I'm surprised there aren't more replies.
Maybe this phone is not as popular as I think it should be. Maybe it's too low-spec for the tech-savvy crowd. I got mine for just $64 at Walmart online, but they've since raised the price to $79. Seems like a good deal, even at that price.
I paid $15 to carrier-unlock it. I had to flash firmware (modem file?) before unlocking, then flash another file (restored modem?) after unlocking. I was following emailed instructions after the initial unlock procedure failed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you please tell the name of the service/company you used to carrier-unlock it ? (I'm in the same situation) Thanks! @danny8
I have two (identical) X4 1900-1 Android One phones , both were rooted with Magisk patched boot image on PPWS29.69-39-6-2. I was able to restore boot image with Magisk Manager on one and the January 1 PPWS29.69-39-6-4 OTA update completed successfully, I reinstalled Magisk per tutorial, root is present and Safetynet passed. The other one became stuck in a kind of updating loop for this OTA prior to restoring the image with Magisk, the update failed on "Step 3 of 6", then starts all over again, ad infinitum, causing battery drain and slowdown. It started this before I restored the boot image with Magisk but fail is continuing since doing so and after a reboot. Automatic updates were turned off in Developer Options, but it still tried to install the update before notifying me that it was available. One difference after restoring boot image with Magisk is that the phone is no longer showing the update progress page--when you tap System Updates the CHecking for Updates flashes briefly and then a toast says Software Update Unsuccessful. That message comes up every few seconds.
My past experience with failed OTA updates on other devices has been the update process stops with one failed update, never tries again and I had to flash manually. Wondering about the best way to address this issue is. One of these phones is my "backup" device, so I have some wiggle room on what to do. Should I (a) flash stock back on the problem phone and let it go through the several security updates, or could I possibly restore a TWRP backup from the updated phone on the problem one? I did a similar restore years ago from one Moto XT926 to another and it worked, but I believe the restored phone might have acquired the serial # of the donor.
I took logcats before and after unrooting, but had trouble uploading one of them. I'll try again.
I spoke a little too soon on the one that "successfully" updated. It is unable to complete phone calls with the same SIM that works in the one that keeps giving the failed update message. Calls just end as soon as send is pressed, or hang trying to connect. In Settings it shows the correct phone number etc., network settings are same as the working phone and this one worked with this SIM a few weeks ago. Some problems connecting to computer visa wifi as well. Beginning to wonder if this is a bad update? Could really use some help here as I don't have a fully functional phone now.
Turns out the "successfully" updated phone is pretty borked. Lots of strange behavior and black screen freezes. The modem/radio seem to have major problems. With no sim card in the phone, the LTE icon shows and indicates signal, but no connectivity. Freezes and blank screens when I hop around in Settings. Wifi connect is wonky. And no phone connectivity with SIM. Looking like I'm gonna have to go back to stock with PPWS29.69-39-6-2, the latest full FW I have.
Has anyone out there had problems with this OTA?
Where can I find the log file from the OTA update, to try and see what went bad?
On the "failed" phone, I was able to find the url for the OTA update (Blur_Version.29.461.4-29.481.10.payton_fi.google_fi.en.US.zip -- PPWS29.69-39-6-4) on the logcat and download it. I've uploaded it to Drive and here is the link is below if anyone needs it. There are lot of error and suspicious messages in one of the logcats from the failed one but interpreting them meaningfully is above my paygrade. I've attached another log to this post. Can someone tell me how to stop the endless updater loop until I can fix the other phone? I am unsure what app/service to disable. I read somewhere there is a way to delay updates on Pie, but it doesn't appear to be a toggle anywhere in Settings.
This is the Android One/Google Fi variant XT1900-1. Flash at own risk!
https://drive.google.com/open?id=151TRLKfmlROCT6f--U4PWRPqmkFyD0T9
The option to force updates is in Developer Options about 10 lines down.
Apparently it defaults to ON.
I have not tested that this would prevent updates since I leave it on, since I want updates.
Force Updates
KrisM22 said:
The option to force updates is in Developer Options about 10 lines down.
Apparently it defaults to ON.
I have not tested that this would prevent updates since I leave it on, since I want updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks , however that option was turned OFF in Developer Options. Update still forced itself on both phones.
Oh well! It's all google's fault!
Back to stock working so far
KrisM22 said:
Oh well! It's all google's fault!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Appears so. Keep reading.
I flashed stock PPWS29.69-39-6-2 and so far things seem to be working--phone, data, wifi.
I'll give a full update on functionality and de-borking when the thing's finished its updates and app installs.
I did notice that in device setup, in the Google Terms the last item "Install updates and apps", states "This device may automatically download and install updates and apps from Google and your device manufacturer...." and there is no on/off toggle!!!! You are forced to accept this "setting", the only option is "Accept"!
Thanks again Google.
I suppose this means that the Developer Options setting is moot.
I would be interested to know if this "(it's not a bug it's a) Feature" is present in Oreo builds?
Remember that google doesn't write android so we can modify it - in fact, google goes WAY out of its way to prevent that - that is why there are so many releases of things like Majisk - google keeps blocking them.
Only a tiny tiny fraction of Moto X4 users attempt any modification of their phones.
You might succeed because you have not yet flashed a custom ROM and thus changed the bootloader and file system from the stock OTA'ed Pie setup. Those that have cannot return. Apparently ever.
KrisM22, would you say that the X4 is a less suitable device than others for rooting? And BTW appreciate your noob warnings, only wish they had appeared sooner. I had already rooted these earlier.
As a matter of practice, I never flash custom ROM or recovery on devices until after they've reached end of OEM support. Actually with the ability to boot TWRP via fastboot I don't see any advantage to installing it but numerous disadvantages. I have unlocked and rooted all my (unlockable) devices, but I may rethink that in light of these recent Android changes. For my next phone I would probably choose a more mod-friendly OEM, if such exists. One+ maybe?
a) you're welcome
b) don't mod this X4 in any way if you are OTA upgraded to Pie.
You might have been able to modify it if it was still on 7 or 8 but I have no idea what the devs are using for
1) bootloader
2)file structiure.
I think, if you have to root, go back to something like a G3, where the bootloader didn't change and the file structure didn't change. Even the Z play had probs around the Oreo bootloader change, but we still could use rsdlite to get back from most disasters.
iow, think pre/pre Treble in any form. It may be, in a couple more years, when Treble has stabilized, that we can get away with modifying things, but on a current phone I would avoid it, UNLESS others have already successfully/repeatedly done it.
I also feel that most of the reason for flashing a custom ROM are gone. People get there, spend a lot of time playing with updates and releases, and eventually go back to stock. There are always a few exceptions, but... As to the various reasons for "needing" root, I feel there are always alternatives. I use Block This! to keep ads out of Brave, BBC app, and APNews app. While there are occasions like can't-edit-build prop, I find I can live without it. It is an adjustment of attitude/expectation. Yes, I have had tons of fun and wasted tons of hours playing with my past phones, it happens I haven't missed it with this one, especially since the sec updates are so recent - I don't worry until it's a year or 2 past.
Once the X4 is on Pie stock, do not modify it in any way.
As to other phones, yes, if you really have to modify it, search the wealth of info that is XDA until you have found a phone that folks have been able to repeatedly get back to stock - be on the lookout for a trail of endless posts about bricked phones and blank flash stuff - a sure sign to avoid it. - This forum is littered with them!
If you have modified a phone: BEFORE taking an OTA, flash phone with latest stock, then let it take the OTA. I had to modify that - I have no idea if you can flash this thing once it is on Pie.
I also feel that most of the reason for flashing a custom ROM are gone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, especially for current devices that are still supported. I'll leave these stock at least until that ends. I actually though it had already reached EOS, so I was caught with my pants down. That said, these phones ran just as well stock/rooted as all of their predecessors I have owned, and as well as when unrooted--until the update fail happened. I may root one if I decide to keep using it beyond EOS. And it's true that most custom ROMs are rarely as smooth and reliable as factory.
Yes, I have had tons of fun and wasted tons of hours playing with my past phones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True Dat! But, a hobby is a hobby, and not everything hobbyists do in any field turns out stellar. One reason I always try to have have a decent running backup phone if I mess with a daily driver.
With an EOS device, the risk of a bad outcome is to a large degree mitgated by the greatly diminished value of the device. I have a Moto X 2015 Clark that I've been playing with Randomblame's LOS16 builds on, and it is very usable. Too bad that phone never had good battery life, I liked everything else about it. Might as well keep it rather than sell it for the maybe 50 bucks it might bring. Hell, I only cut my last XT926 loose early last year!
Everything's looking good. After flashing back to stock PPWS29.69-39-6-2, Phone updated OTA to PPWS29.69-39-6-4 and everything appears to be working well. So far no bad residue from past rooting etc.
redwoodie said:
Everything's looking good. After flashing back to stock PPWS29.69-39-6-2, Phone updated OTA to PPWS29.69-39-6-4 and everything appears to be working well. So far no bad residue from past rooting etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EXCELLENT!!! Great to hear!
Yes, always have a backup!!!
EOS: I was surprised by this update and am now guessing that we might even get one in Mar or Apr. We'll just have to see if that includes 10. But to me a phone is not really "EOS" until maybe a year or 2 after it stops getting updates. I haven't heard of anyone getting hacked. On any phone.
Great!!!
If you are willing, could you do a couple things:
Go to first post edit, go advanced and mark thread as SOLVED.
add a post about how you did it:
1) disclaimer: "Do at your own risk. I am not responsible for anything." or some such!
2. a sentence or 2 about how you did the flash.
3. attach a copy of the bat file you used for the flash.
I think only works if you haven't changed bootloader or file system - NO custom ROM.
Thanks!
Post issue solved etc.
I will happily do that once I've gotten the second X4 straightened out, at that point I'll feel confident it is really "solved".. Probably next week at soonest, I have a minor medical procedure today. I didn't use a .bat file, I fastboot flashed each .img, erase and sparsechunk the old school way. There was a flashall.bat I found on XDA but it was for Oreo builds, had a couple lines in it I was unsure about, and wasn't comfortable modifying it.
Many thanks! Hope all goes well with that today!
If you could provide a log, or list of commands used, that would help!
Update on flashing 2nd X4 back to stock...Flashed PPWS29.69-39-6-2 twice same results: I have wifi/LTE connectivity issues, the wifi constantly connects and disconnects and phone/LTE tries and fails.
There are a couple of threads that discuss similar probles with the X4 and offer various solutions. I may try those, or going back to original Moto Pie ROM or an intermediate build. I also was able to grab the latest Jan. 1 update ROM and that's another option.
The odd thing about this flash is that everything about the phone state was 100% identical to the other X4 that I successfully restored via exact same methods. It would appear that "your mileage may vary" applies. I'll update again when I have new info.
redwoodie said:
Update on flashing 2nd X4 back to stock...Flashed PPWS29.69-39-6-2 twice same results: I have wifi/LTE connectivity issues, the wifi constantly connects and disconnects and phone/LTE tries and fails.
There are a couple of threads that discuss similar probles with the X4 and offer various solutions. I may try those, or going back to original Moto Pie ROM or an intermediate build. I also was able to grab the latest Jan. 1 update ROM and that's another option.
The odd thing about this flash is that everything about the phone state was 100% identical to the other X4 that I successfully restored via exact same methods. It would appear that "your mileage may vary" applies. I'll update again when I have new info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. modem problems? Dunno... Keep us posted! Thanks!
Are your two One fi, or regular - I bet the motherboards on the two are different, thus the different result.
Both One/Fi. Same baseband versionon both.
Just re-flashed NON-HLOS.bin ad fsg.mbn, same results.
I'm a little baffled by the script commands that follow these flashes to "erase modemst1/t2". One user on this thread claimed omitting (commenting out) those erase commands cured the problem https://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-x4/how-to/android-one-xt1900-1-wifi-sim-stock-t3941837.
I tried the modem flash mentioned above with out the erase commands. No change.
Another suggests:
My XT1900-7 had lost its IMEIs and Wifi connections, even after factory reset.
The solution:
Get XT1900-1_PAYTON_FI_9.0_PPWS29.69-39-2-4_subsidy-DEFAULT_regulatory-DEFAULT_CFC.xml.zip from lolinet
if you are booting from slot _b, then go to fastboot and flash modem from this FI ROM:
Code:
fastboot flash modem_b NON-HLOS.bin
fastboot erase modemst1
fastboot erase modemst2
fastboot reboot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thinking about flashing back to original stock Pie 29.69-26, or the latest 29.69-39-6-4.