Unlike apple who are decreasing your mobile performance over time , oneplus is actually increasing it !!
After the recent oreo update i benchmarked my device : 6gb ram variant and the antutut score was 179539 which is higher than 8gb nougat variants score as well as s8 and u11 score as well .
s8 score :173035
u11 score : 175372 (source : google)
this is not the case in antutu , geekbench 4 score single core score for my device was 1995, where as multicore was 6800.
S8 score for single core was 2020 ,where as multicore was 6706. and U11 score for single core was 1889 , where as multicore was 6330.
what were your score on your rom and kernel ??
I’m still on Nougat, completely standard and I get 178031. 8Gb model.
Alan
Is this relevant? ?
Enviado desde mi ONEPLUS A5000 mediante Tapatalk
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
here is mine
Mine. This is with the standard Oos ob3. No tunning at all.
Lol wtf oneplus were literally exposed for lying on benchmark test and yet you believe the benchmark scores. How gullible are you?
Real-life usage is definitely the way to go. Benchmarks aren't a good representative of actual performance. Antutu also causes stability issues on my OP5, such as random reboots.
Related
Ok so i did some benchmark tests and a few hours run time and i found that I am only getting 1.5 ghz. Nowere do i see 2.1 ghz. Maybe my other 4 cores are not even kicking in. I am going to install faux clock or something to keep an eye on this. Please ley me know any finding you guys might have.
Ok I confirmed the 8 cores are working with trickstermod however they will not go past 1.5ghz. Not happy about this. Might have to return it. Any thoughts.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3080833 ok I went here to see peoples cpu spy screenshoys and to my surprise I found that no one else has cpu state past 1.5ghz. What is going on here? Am i missing something?
jonahtriangle said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3080833 ok I went here to see peoples cpu spy screenshoys and to my surprise I found that no one else has cpu state past 1.5ghz. What is going on here? Am i missing something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm guessing no one has proper support to read this new hardware properly
That's strange. My first 32 gb s6 showed the 2.1 step being used. My new 64 GB does not in 124 hours of continuous use
mrapp said:
I'm guessing no one has proper support to read this new hardware properly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The exynos octa core has been around for years since the galaxy s4. If it is a suport issue, you would think all the apps would catch on in 2 years.
Mine is confirmed to read 1.5 also. Even though my AnTuTu score was 65k
Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
I have the same problem on my rooted s6 edge. Very odd
hey guys,
recently I discovered brilliant app ( Intel® Performance Viewer ) which can monitor cpu core usage and freqs in real-time. As I was always concerned about my Z4's underperforming 810 chip, I decided to test cpu in different apps. So heres one - M&B WARBAND which is emulated and requires a lot of horse power. I also spawned around 200 troops to harden the task. As you can see I got 5 FPS while Big Chip (A57) is literally sleeping. Naturally, A53 is struggling at getting playable framerate. Same thing happens in Antutu, GeekBench, PPSSPP, and in every power demanding apps( games, emulators and etc).
WTF is wrong with 810 CPU guys? or should I blame Sony for trash governors which can't figure out when they should activate all cores?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Just hope they fix this in marshmallow.
Sent from my E6533 using XDA Free mobile app
Can anyone test this again in MM? Would be greatly appreciated.
neestea said:
Can anyone test this again in MM? Would be greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's functioning much much better. There's another thread that shows benchmarks.
Sent from my E6533 using XDA Free mobile app
big.Little on this device runs HMP
The most powerful use model of big.LITTLE architecture is heterogeneous multi-processing (HMP), which enables the use of all physical cores at the same time. Threads with high priority or computational intensity can in this case be allocated to the "big" cores while threads with less priority or less computational intensity, such as background tasks, can be performed by the "LITTLE" cores.[10][11] source from Wikipedia.
running BLA-L29 8.0.0.128 (C636)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
yeah there perfect in line...better than samsung flagships etc...
wooley4766 said:
yeah there perfect in line...better than samsung flagships etc...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm asking because
https://wccftech.com/huaweis-kirin-...ragon-845-worrying-sign-san-diego-chip-maker/
kinjx11 said:
i'm asking because
https://wccftech.com/huaweis-kirin-...ragon-845-worrying-sign-san-diego-chip-maker/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those scores are from different app. Can't compare to international antutu version.
different app for sure i get around 175-180.000 antutu on a mate 10
yeah and if ur reading it good, it says the mi 6 had 206445 points.
but the mi6 is a 835 not the new 845
Yes this score is using antutu 7.0.1.
I downloaded it and check it by myself.i get higher score also
This my score
spring80 said:
Yes this score is using antutu 7.0.1.
I downloaded it and check it by myself.i get higher score also
This my score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmmm
cooling matters yo
By the way,i like the new tests in the antutu 7.0.1
Antutu 7
I was pretty surprised at the score but I think Antutu 7 process's scores differently. Haven't tried Antutu 6 yet.
i get around 214k-217k so that's about right. However, after today's Antutu hands on test with the S9 or S9+, they got 280k + which is insane. that being said, depending on which phone we are using, we either have 4GB or 6GB (Mate 10/pro) and 1080p vs 2560x1600. not sure if antutu is running s9 with their full QHD+ or if it's manually set to FHD like most s8's were.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9+, which launched in March running Android 8.0 out of the box, may be about to get the 8.1 update in the near future. The Galaxy S9 has been spotted in a Geekbench listing running Android 8.1.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Samsung hasn't provided any guideline on when the update will arrive, and benchmark listings can't be seen as anything certain, but at least we know the update is in development.
We can hope that the testing goes smoothly and the official rollout isn't that far away now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s9_running_android_81_spotted_in_benchmarks-news-30882.php
I look forward to this in a few months
10185 for the multicore score! Thats about the same as the iphone X with it's a11!
i think its los or rr i got the same score
TMCThomas said:
10185 for the multicore score! Thats about the same as the iphone X with it's a11!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since they tried to copy the A11 architecture on the S9, I'm pretty disappointed in its struggle and battery life.
Better to fix it now than never.
doriandiaconu said:
Since they tried to copy the A11 architecture on the S9, I'm pretty disappointed in its struggle and battery life.
Better to fix it now than never.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it's just a geekbench bench of Lineage on the S9.
My last phone was a Snapdragon 810 and now I have the Exynos S9, being unlucky twice on a high-end device really sucks.
iamnotkurtcobain said:
Maybe it's just a geekbench bench of Lineage on the S9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would seem likely, they probably have been overclocking ad messing with the kernel too tbh
Is this the exynos version or sd?
Mi 9 6/128 Antutu results 343295 it is less then average results. Why?
Any phone now days is so smooth that benchmark scores dont even matter. If you really want the top score though the Extreme Kernel can get over 400k score.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=79301707&postcount=79
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
EniGmA1987 said:
Any phone now days is so smooth that benchmark scores dont even matter. If you really want the top score though the Extreme Kernel can get over 400k score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for sharing my results ???
I got 372000. 6/64 version with global stable 10.2
Very high scores on CPU/GPU, as expected.
Sent from my MI 9 using Tapatalk
Last global
MI 9 cihazımdan Tapatalk kullanılarak gönderildi
Today after update antutu wont install anymore, not compatibe model ?????
Any AnTuTu score with CPU/GPU over 100K and MEM over 10K don't really matter anymore, they will feel the same in day to day task. Only during video encoding or over 60fps games (even the heavy titles) they will start differing. But it's useless if the phone's display refresh rate is capped at 60Hz. My best score with AnTuTu 8 is 498K by using Xiaomi.eu stable ROM, I'm now in global stable and I use LKT magisk module to drop the performance for better battery life and still getting 411K.