Related
I have been trying out JB roms lately and really them but I have a problem with my camera apps, mainly Camera FV-5 & Camera Pro.
The problem is that they load fine but when looking at the screen the preview of what I am going to take the photo of is only about 2/3 size of the screen and then there is a black border for the rest of the screen, I rely on my camera so I have to be able to see the whole screen.
The roms I have tried are BlackCNA v2.1 & PARANOIDANDROID 2.17 [Utacka]
Any help would be appreciated.
Oh is it possible to have the Galaxy note 2 gallery in these roms?
belveder69 said:
the preview of what I am going to take the photo of is only about 2/3 size of the screen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks like the previous are borrowed from the stock camera which leaves room for the settings and shutter.
Do you see your pictures correctly in gallery?
Sent from the Great Note
---------- Post added at 05:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:24 PM ----------
not previous, previews.
Sent from the Great Note
Thanks for the reply, I haven't taken any photo's, mmm I must have worded it wrong for lack of a better word, what I mean is the area of the screen you look at when you take a photo
Even two year old phones like the LG G2 have it. Anyone know if it will be included in a future update? The hardware is obviously capable.
The hardware is capable but the Google Camera app is absolutely horrible.
Try LCamera: https://github.com/PkmX/lcamera/releases
GrayBoltWolf said:
The hardware is capable but the Google Camera app is absolutely horrible.
Try LCamera: https://github.com/PkmX/lcamera/releases
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't know why everybody says that goog camera is so bad. It works just as well as any other.
Also, lcamera's 60fps mode is limited to Hammerhead, and requires custom hacked blobs to enable. Won't do it on Shamu.
OP:
No 60fps because you won't get anything useful out of it. It'll just suck your storage dry faster.
doitright said:
Don't know why everybody says that goog camera is so bad. It works just as well as any other.
Also, lcamera's 60fps mode is limited to Hammerhead, and requires custom hacked blobs to enable. Won't do it on Shamu.
OP:
No 60fps because you won't get anything useful out of it. It'll just suck your storage dry faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uh...60fps is extremely useful, especially now that youtube shows videos in 60fps. It's a world of difference compared to 30fps.
doitright said:
Don't know why everybody says that goog camera is so bad. It works just as well as any other.
Also, lcamera's 60fps mode is limited to Hammerhead, and requires custom hacked blobs to enable. Won't do it on Shamu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dunno what you are talking about. Works just fine for me:
http://i.imgur.com/m35cK4M.png
Open camera is another good one, have been using it until google overhauls the stock camera app
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.sourceforge.opencamera&hl=en
doitright said:
Don't know why everybody says that goog camera is so bad. It works just as well as any other.
Also, lcamera's 60fps mode is limited to Hammerhead, and requires custom hacked blobs to enable. Won't do it on Shamu.
OP:
No 60fps because you won't get anything useful out of it. It'll just suck your storage dry faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean nothing useful out of it? Suck your storage faster. We want 1080p 60frames. On our 64 gig storage phones. To take video with fast movement. I understand 2160p at 30 frames. Technology isn't there yet. But 1080p is and shame on Google for not enabling it.
---------- Post added at 10:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:39 PM ----------
GrayBoltWolf said:
Dunno what you are talking about. Works just fine for me:
http://i.imgur.com/m35cK4M.png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What app are you using?
tansuperman said:
What app are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is L Camera which I linked above.
I have tried open camera and lcamera. both set to [email protected] actually record with about 30fps!
madphone said:
I have tried open camera and lcamera. both set to [email protected] actually record with about 30fps!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea thats my experience too, it doesn't actually record in 60fps unfortunately
italia0101 said:
Yea thats my experience too, it doesn't actually record in 60fps unfortunately
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sucks to hear. I will do my own test, but I believe you guys. Not sure why moto would do this to us. 1080p 30 fps is lame.
brian85 said:
Uh...60fps is extremely useful, especially now that youtube shows videos in 60fps. It's a world of difference compared to 30fps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The difference is in your head.
---------- Post added at 05:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:32 PM ----------
madphone said:
I have tried open camera and lcamera. both set to [email protected] actually record with about 30fps!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahahahahaha, to all those who tried it and said "OMG 60fps is soooooo smooth", I LOL @ you, because this guy has proof that you're imagining the difference.
doitright said:
The difference is in your head.
---------- Post added at 05:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:32 PM ----------
Hahahahahaha, to all those who tried it and said "OMG 60fps is soooooo smooth", I LOL @ you, because this guy has proof that you're imagining the difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You really don't see the difference in frame rates? I have a hard time seeing resolution differences, but 30 vs 60 is pretty clear to me.
doitright said:
The difference is in your head.
---------- Post added at 05:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:32 PM ----------
Hahahahahaha, to all those who tried it and said "OMG 60fps is soooooo smooth", I LOL @ you, because this guy has proof that you're imagining the difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you can't notice the difference in framerate between 30 and 60 than you might want to visit a doctor.
The difference is extremely clear, and very desirable for smooth video and motion.
There is a reason that most video games run at 60 FPS instead of 30.
It looks smoother but if the bitrate stays the same, compression on each frame is higher which results in degraded picture quality particularly with complex movement/subjects.
60FPS is definitely useful as you can play it back at 30FPS and have 2:1 slow motion, etc.
Have to give it to Apple for their app as their 240fps mode is great for slow motion. Having the sound in there is also neat. Makes my little Jack Russell's growl sound like a lion's roar!
I use Cinema FV-5 and was surprised to see no 1080 60P mode available. It may be locked in the firmware even though the hardware is capable of higher frame rates.
doitright said:
The difference is in your head.
---------- Post added at 05:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:32 PM ----------
Hahahahahaha, to all those who tried it and said "OMG 60fps is soooooo smooth", I LOL @ you, because this guy has proof that you're imagining the difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol at you for trying so hard. If you can't see the difference; better see a doctor.
doitright said:
Don't know why everybody says that goog camera is so bad. It works just as well as any other.
Also, lcamera's 60fps mode is limited to Hammerhead, and requires custom hacked blobs to enable. Won't do it on Shamu.
OP:
No 60fps because you won't get anything useful out of it. It'll just suck your storage dry faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean 60fps is not better than 30fps? 60fps is not useful? Damn, that made me laugh so hard:silly:
cpufrost said:
It looks smoother but if the bitrate stays the same, compression on each frame is higher which results in degraded picture quality particularly with complex movement/subjects.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is incorrect. If you look at my camera screenshot on the last page you will clearly see that it allows for double the bitrate. 16 Mbps instead of 8.
GrayBoltWolf said:
This is incorrect. If you look at my camera screenshot on the last page you will clearly see that it allows for double the bitrate. 16 Mbps instead of 8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes what I said is true, if it stays the same. In your case it's not the same.
16Mbps is a bit low still, however.
cpufrost said:
Yes what I said is true, if it stays the same. In your case it's not the same.
16Mbps is a bit low still, however.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For 1080/60 16 is just fine to upload to YouTube or something. I don't think many people plan on making movies with their phones.
Let's keep this simple and clean!
Share with this big community the best pictures you taken with your OnePlus3
Best regards,
Taker
First.
Love the camera
Better than the OP2
Good camera
I think it' awesome
camera is not as good as my previous 6P or s7edge,but way better than s6 or Op2
As before, it isn't as good as my old s7 edge but I didn't expect it to be. Its still very capable
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Not the best but considering the price it's great!!
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Are you guys using 4:3 mode? I assume that's native for this camera? Having a hard time finding info on it.
Thanks
4:3 is native.
16:9 is cut of at the sides.
AcmE85 said:
4:3 is native.
16:9 is cut of at the sides.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I thought.
Thanks man!
Snapped this one yesterday afternoon with my OP3 using manual mode
smartcoder said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
?
Regards,
Taker
Clicked with OnePlus 3, Processed with Snapseed
---------- Post added at 07:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:53 PM ----------
Taker18 said:
?
Regards,
Taker
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what you mean. I clicked it with OP3 and processed it with Snapseed. Mostly tweaked the exposure.
This is a very low light shot in Auto mode (The ISO shows ISO 3200) which is super impressive for a cell phone camera.
---------- Post added at 07:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:56 PM ----------
Clicked with OnePlus 3, processed with Snapseed
---------- Post added at 08:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:57 PM ----------
Clicked with OnePlus 3 and processed with Snapseed
Love your pictures @smartcoder! Well done!
Was just testing the camera with random objects. I had a s5 before and felt that s5 clicked better pics than OP3. It's still pretty decent though
Just wanted to show an image with some higher motion. It's also cropped. This was on OOS 3.1.3.
Took on my trip
Pretty good camera
https://goo.gl/photos/Uf9D6JFyWrApqUaeA
Some industrial, coalmine
Spoiler
Tonight : Lyon, France
Is there any way to get slow mo 240fps or higher
Thankx in adv
I doubt it. The spec sheet for the camera sensor doesn't mention any resolution above 60 fps so the 120 fps slo-mo already available is probably as good as it gets.
Pandur77 said:
I doubt it. The spec sheet for the camera sensor doesn't mention any resolution above 60 fps so the 120 fps slo-mo already available is probably as good as it gets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I watched a video in youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUtHqRloH4I
This video is showing a Rom "CR Droid"
It has 240FPS video capturing ability
shirso.it7 said:
Well I watched a video in youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUtHqRloH4I
This video is showing a Rom "CR Droid"
It has 240FPS video capturing ability
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon 835 isn't too fast from 821.
Sony XZ Premuim is supporting 960FPS with SD835.
Our phone is quiet capable of doing 240FPS
shirso.it7 said:
Snapdragon 835 isn't too fast from 821.
Sony XZ Premuim is supporting 960FPS with SD835.
Our phone is quiet capable of doing 240FPS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
at what resolution is the 240fps.
240fps is really good if it can record at least 1080p
just curious
---------- Post added at 07:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:41 PM ----------
i don't believe that video because it just looks like and insert.
it would be worth considering the video if the exif files are attached.
and any shot of the 3T within the environment, or establishing shot.
jmadiaga said:
at what resolution is the 240fps.
240fps is really good if it can record at least 1080p
just curious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Noh, It showed 720p, which is not bad. Infact our default 120FPS videos recorded at 720p.
---------- Post added at 07:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:41 PM ----------
[/COLOR]i don't believe that video because it just looks like and insert.
it would be worth considering the video if the exif files are attached.
and any shot of the 3T within the environment, or establishing shot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the slomo video demonstrated seemed 240FPS... And that guys said something about snapdragon camera, which is available here. But as that rom is cross platformed, that might contain that 240FPS feature
Nexus 6p records 240fps on a sd810
sutty86 said:
Nexus 6p records 240fps on a sd810
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See that's what I'm saying man !
We have the specs, then why SETTLE ?
I'm pretty sure the camera sensor bottlenecks the phone's ability to record at higher framefrates. The OnePlus 3/T uses the Sony IMX298 camera sensor, while phones like the Nexus 6P use the more powerful Sony IMX377 sensor that is actually designed to record at higher framerates at lower resolutions.
The specs sheet for the IMX298 sensor from Sony themselves state that the sensor can only achieve up to 120 fps at 720p. Even lowering the resolution during recording will not overcome the limitations of the sensor. This isn't the type of limitation that can be overcome with software. No other phone that I have seen using the Sony IMX298 sensor is able to record above 120 fps either.
When one designs a flagship phone at half the price of other flagships, some things must be cut. OnePlus simply gave priority to the CPU/RAM over the camera sensor.
---------- Post added at 03:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:02 PM ----------
BTW, the camera app in CR Droid may show a 240fps option, but has anyone confirmed that it actually works? Custom ROMs are often ported across multiple devices and I doubt developers will go through every settings menu in each app to see that has become redundant.
Nice and brief explanation. letme ask crdroid team..
Hello everyone.
I'm debating whether to buy the P30 Pro or not, but I don't want to make the decision until I see some RAW photos from its camera.
I find it crazy that there isn't a single RAW/DNG photo available for download on the entire internet and I've been searching for them for them far and wide.
Can a good soul among you who owns the P30 Pro provide me with a couple of different photos? I'm mainly interested in the main 40 megapixel sensor, so you don't have to bother with samples from the other two sensors if it's too much of a hassle for you.
Thank you!
I have no idea how to process RAW files, but here's one (78MB). Colors are way off, at least in my preview
https://send.firefox.com/download/6bbd3ed9c6d35ad6/#CB4fy4GGA05qUsBOPq0gBA
---------- Post added at 07:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:29 PM ----------
Another:
https://send.firefox.com/download/e019714f7411d511/#PXxNRQNBkBEkoXbx9k9buA
Nickoz said:
I have no idea how to process RAW files, but here's one (78MB). Colors are way off, at least in my preview
https://send.firefox.com/download/6bbd3ed9c6d35ad6/#CB4fy4GGA05qUsBOPq0gBA
---------- Post added at 07:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:29 PM ----------
Another:
https://send.firefox.com/download/e019714f7411d511/#PXxNRQNBkBEkoXbx9k9buA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, my good man.
Well, it's normal that the colors are off, you are supposed to adjust them to your own liking since that is one of the main reasons to shot in RAW.
If you want to color-correct the main camera I found that pulling the tones of red, orange and yellow to around -40 is a good start. Also pulling the green curve in the darks a little into purple and it almost looks real.
Nickoz said:
I have no idea how to process RAW files, but here's one (78MB). Colors are way off, at least in my preview
https://send.firefox.com/download/6bbd3ed9c6d35ad6/#CB4fy4GGA05qUsBOPq0gBA
---------- Post added at 07:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:29 PM ----------
Another:
https://send.firefox.com/download/e019714f7411d511/#PXxNRQNBkBEkoXbx9k9buA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use DNG processor to auto process your picture in the background after taking RAW shots. Check out DNG Processor
Firefox Send has discontinued
I have been struggling to find a Huawei raw file as well. Unfortunately firefox send has been discontinued so I was unable to access these files. Would it be possible to access these files in another way?
Thanks in advances!
Of topic (I really don't know about raw, but every photographer does say raw photography does have the most beautiful end result in most ways.... So I have to learn about it).
But does anyone know why it's recommended, with the p30 pro, to have image size of photos in 4:3 instead of full image?
Why is 4:3 recommended?
I like the full view much better whioe shooting a picture, but if its less better I don't do it anymore.
Thanks for your time.