Camera test on OS 9.5.5 - OnePlus 7 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion

So I received OS 9..5.5 first thing this morning and went out and took some video and photos and added my thoughts on the new camera firmware.
https://youtu.be/wIXEsktlEs8
I love the phone, the camera is the weakness, as focus is still an issue. When it takes a good shot, its epic. Let me know if you have any questions etc.

the latest build i have is 9.5.4 and that just updated today

Qwest905 said:
the latest build i have is 9.5.4 and that just updated today
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OP may have T-Mobile variant
id be curious to see the difference between Smart Content Detection on and off as i believe it has a difference.

I am in the UK. I got 9.5.4 when I first got phone. 9.5.5 arrived this morning.

Ive tested the new firmware compared to the iphone XS. The op7 still lacks in detail, the images are bit soft. What I was surprised to see is that the focal length of the regular main sensor on the iphone is wider than the wide angle on the op7. Unfortunately the update does resolve some issues but does not take it to the next level.

How the camera work with motion/action shots? Static images look good, but the few pictures I’ve seen of people moving have higher motion blur and ghosting.

Someone try smart Content Detection on and off as i believe it has a difference.
Post images with it on and off let's see the difference!

Pit Stains said:
How the camera work with motion/action shots? Static images look good, but the few pictures I’ve seen of people moving have higher motion blur and ghosting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest, it's not great. I have a Iphone xs too and it's about twice as good for movement/action shots.

A.Priori said:
To be honest, it's not great. I have a Iphone xs too and it's about twice as good for movement/action shots.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try it with Smart Content Detection off and compare pictures

Pit Stains said:
How the camera work with motion/action shots? Static images look good, but the few pictures I’ve seen of people moving have higher motion blur and ghosting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awful because of the ridiculously slow shutter speed.
Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

Batfink33 said:
Awful because of the ridiculously slow shutter speed.
Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you test with smart content detection OFF please.

Related

New update for Unlocked V40 - V11b

Unlocked variant of the V40 has a new update today. Includes the November security patch along with other usability and functionality improvements.
I also managed to take a few before and after shots to see how the camera performs/changed. Looks like they made some changes to the HDR intensity and improved the quality of the telephoto. The HDR is an animated GIF showing the contrast between the two. The telephoto is a side-by-side. I had to drop the save quality of that image down to post but you can see the difference in quality when looking at the tree branch in the middle and the houses behind it.
SHosp said:
Unlocked variant of the V40 has a new update today. Includes the November security patch along with other usability and functionality improvements.
I also managed to take a few before and after shots to see how the camera performs/changed. Looks like they made some changes to the HDR intensity and improved the quality of the telephoto. The HDR is an animated GIF showing the contrast between the two. The telephoto is a side-by-side. I had to drop the save quality of that image down to post but you can see the difference in quality when looking at the tree branch in the middle and the houses behind it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice pics, Castle Rock?
anahataray said:
Nice pics, Castle Rock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Close. Colorado Springs.
SHosp said:
Close. Colorado Springs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh, off garden of the gods. Coronado 96
SHosp said:
Close. Colorado Springs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh, off garden of the gods. Coronado 96
I prefer the previous hdr ?
Hi all,
I have the korean version (6/128)..is it possible to use this new software version? I have a v10...something
thanks all
In really disappointed with the camera. I'm getting blurry pictures a lot but when I switch to another camera app photos looks decent.
I may change the phone to another

bad bad bad selfie quality!!!

Got my p4xl 2 days ago, what is this garbage front camera?!
Faces loss details, whats happened to Google?!
Last p3xl was the best selfie camera!
Why f 2.0? Why 25 mm len?
Very disappointed, my op7 pro with gcam has better results, better battery life and half price.... Google this year you lost the game...
avivasaf said:
Got my p4xl 2 days ago, what is this garbage front camera?!
Faces loss details, whats happened to Google?!
Last p3xl was the best selfie camera!
Why f 2.0? Why 25 mm len?
Very disappointed, my op7 pro with gcam has better results, better battery life and half price.... Google this year you lost the game...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool story, bro!
Did you disable the skin smoothing that's on by default? Also the update is supposed to improve selfie camera.
PuffinNugz said:
Did you disable the skin smoothing that's on by default? Also the update is supposed to improve selfie camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Disable smooth skin, did update
Sharpness so bad especially at indoor/low light
P3xl did great work, p4xl distorted it
Front camera :no shapness
avivasaf said:
Front camera :no shapness
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha really dude??
Think you missed the point with a front camera if you're taking pics like that with it..
tigercranestyle said:
And maybe I'm missing something as I'm not a photography nerd, but why is the picture only 2.8 megapixels? Can't seem to do anything in settings to make the selfie cam go from 8 to 2.8 megapixels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely something wrong, that info shows it's in the download folder and only 265kb. That's not straight from the camera. Like someone sent it as an MMS and it was downloaded.
tigercranestyle said:
And maybe I'm missing something as I'm not a photography nerd, but why is the picture only 2.8 megapixels? Can't seem to do anything in settings to make the selfie cam go from 8 to 2.8 megapixels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the upload file to xda! Not the real taken photo!!!
Fille84 said:
Haha really dude??
Think you missed the point with a front camera if you're taking pics like that with it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before you come to any conclusion, the point is the selfie camera didnt improved in px4xl it worse now.
I photo behind me not myself and this was the results just to show how is the quality!!!
You guy need to try more phones if you like this front camera...
tigercranestyle said:
Yep. Forgot to mention that also. Always seems to be the OnePlus folks... and not just here. Also Reddit. There is a lot of them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I switched from oneplus that knowing Google is better, not this time...
Sorry but i needed to believe the reviews even the front facing camera didnt mention there...
The rear camera is the best out there for sure, but why Google went down in the specs of front camera?!
The battery also needed to improve better, we are in 2019 not 2016,Google needs to make 4000ma batteries and more, this is one of the most important things for users.
Everybody says front facing camera is not important as rear, but you can see people at the street, when traveling always makes selfie photos, so you need to improve it also or not make it less better than your previous phone
Got to say I'm pretty impressed by the sharpness regarding contours on my end. You're definitely using the cam the wrong way, or got a faulty sensor.
Sent from my Google Pixel 4 XL using XDA Labs
Now you have explain for the nonsharp photo??? Dont answer, because you dont have answers!!!
I just took three shots, one with smoothness off, one on, and one portrait. ALL of them look REALLY good. 'shrugs'
tigercranestyle said:
Yeah... no. The front-facing camera isn't 6 megapixels either. If anything other than some upset OnePlus user, it must be user error.
The ffc isn't 2.8 megapixels and it's not 6 megapixels. It's also not 3.14159265359 megapixels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So try to shoot one photo and see the information you get, this is what i got. The phone is original bought at Saturn Germany
tigercranestyle said:
Yeah... no. The front-facing camera isn't 6 megapixels either. If anything other than some upset OnePlus user, it must be user error.
The ffc isn't 2.8 megapixels and it's not 6 megapixels. It's also not 3.14159265359 megapixels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be great to see a proof that you got something else
tigercranestyle said:
Test.
You're right about xda upload changing the megapixel size of the photo. I was wondering about that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But see the details in the original photo you are taking its 6M not 8M,strange...
avivasaf said:
But see the details in the original photo you are taking its 6M not 8M,strange...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I checked in photos taken with my old px3xl details got 8M!!!another **** in px4xl?!
tigercranestyle said:
Have no problem admitting I was wrong about uploading to xda changing the megapixels. Attaching a photo of my post indicating that I was wrong.
Again, are you rooted? Everyone else had no problem with ffc but you. Are you rooted?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im not rooted! Again, take a selfie photo look at the details of the photo, its i inside a circle and tell me please what is the size of photo you shooted 6M or 8M?
tigercranestyle said:
I said I was wrong about the megapixels, but you don't have a Pixel 4 xl.
You're not rooted? Yet you're using three button navigation and your home button is missing the circle around the home button that has been present since the first Pixel xl. Pic is attached showing your navbar and what it looks like with three button navigation enabled on the pixel 4 xl. You're likely using a phone with a skimmed down version on Android on another phone. You're navigation bar looks similiar to the one on the Essential phone without the circle around the nav bar. I've attached a pic of that as well.
Also your clock is supposed to be on the left side. Signal and battery are supposed to be on the right. Pic is attached of how it's supposed to look.
Was going to say that your Google Lens icon is missing, but it's not available in Israel.
Anyhow, chances are is that you're using some random Gcam mod that you've posted about in the past.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you saying?! In Hebrew the buttons and the clock are opposite to English, im using pixel 4 xl 2 days brand new, attached my system details!
Lack of sharpness is probably more like lack of focus. The front facing camera is fixed focus. It's no different than my Pixel 2 XL and both do fine for me. You gotta hold it a little steadier. Something that helps is using the 3 second timer so tapping the on screen shutter or the volume button don't produce extra movement.
Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

Question Camera settings - Video stabilisation

Default setting for video stabilisation is enabled. Anyone disable it? If so, what are your reasons for doing so?
ssj100 said:
Default setting for video stabilisation is enabled. Anyone disable it? If so, what are your reasons for doing so?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It crops in when enabled, basically you get less view in the frame as it stabilizes the video.
I keep mine off to fit more in the frame as I don't walk around much while doing so and hold the phone steady in hand.
For a much wider view, remain in photo mode and hold the shutter button to record video. You get the full ultra wide view to record though you can't switch lenses and it's at a lower resolution.
ZayaanAhyaan said:
It crops in when enabled, basically you get less view in the frame as it stabilizes the video.
I keep mine off to fit more in the frame as I don't walk around much while doing so and hold the phone steady in hand.
For a much wider view, remain in photo mode and hold the shutter button to record video. You get the full ultra wide view to record though you can't switch lenses and it's at a lower resolution.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't get any cropping with it enabled. However, I can definitely tell the difference in "stability" between enabled and disabled when I take a video while eg. purposefully jumping around.
Just to confirm, you are using S21 Ultra with April update?
ssj100 said:
I don't get any cropping with it enabled. However, I can definitely tell the difference in "stability" between enabled and disabled when I take a video while eg. purposefully jumping around.
Just to confirm, you are using S21 Ultra with April update?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a small amount of cropping. You might not be seeing it due to the aspect ratio you are using.
babyboy3265 said:
There is a small amount of cropping. You might not be seeing it due to the aspect ratio you are using.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There was cropping on the S7 and S9+ that I previously used, and also I'm pretty sure I noticed it prior to April update on S21 Ultra. But with April update, I don't notice any cropping at all.
ssj100 said:
Default setting for video stabilisation is enabled. Anyone disable it? If so, what are your reasons for doing so?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never use it at all. as it reduce the quality significantly which is unacceptable for me and makes it a useless function.
ssj100 said:
There was cropping on the S7 and S9+ that I previously used, and also I'm pretty sure I noticed it prior to April update on S21 Ultra. But with April update, I don't notice any cropping at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well im also on the April update and there's definitely about 20% cropping...
ssj100 said:
There was cropping on the S7 and S9+ that I previously used, and also I'm pretty sure I noticed it prior to April update on S21 Ultra. But with April update, I don't notice any cropping at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a theory of how the phone can stabilize video without cropping?
Another thought - you can never recover the portion of the video that is cropped off, you will always miss those details that would have been captured if not for the cropping. However, you can always use a video editor to apply video stabilization after the fact, and judge whether it's worth cropping in.
KingFatty said:
Do you have a theory of how the phone can stabilize video without cropping?
Another thought - you can never recover the portion of the video that is cropped off, you will always miss those details that would have been captured if not for the cropping. However, you can always use a video editor to apply video stabilization after the fact, and judge whether it's worth cropping in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly, usually stabilization in editing can often ruin the video. Especially WARP in Premiere. But indeed pre-cropping loses detail. Nothing is perfect.
I also was baffled when I realized that having the initial stabilization option ON, crops the image. I thought that the OIS was managing to do the job without cropping. I guess limited understanding is at fault.
Regardless, the ultimate solution to have stable video and maximum detail is having a Gimbal. As of this point China has a plethora to offer for like 50euros on average.
babyboy3265 said:
Well im also on the April update and there's definitely about 20% cropping...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you using SD or Exynos? I'm on Exynos, and as I said, I did notice this cropping before. Now I can't reproduce it anymore! However, I can easily tell the difference between stabilisation On/Off by eg. running/jumping up and down while recording video. When off, it's really quite jerky. While with it enabled, it's surprisingly stable.
ssj100 said:
Are you using SD or Exynos? I'm on Exynos, and as I said, I did notice this cropping before. Now I can't reproduce it anymore! However, I can easily tell the difference between stabilisation On/Off by eg. running/jumping up and down while recording video. When off, it's really quite jerky. While with it enabled, it's surprisingly stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos here too buddy.. When you tested the cropping vs stabilization, did you use exactly the same settings as me?
*4k30/16:9/main camera
babyboy3265 said:
Exynos here too buddy.. When you tested the cropping vs stabilization, did you use exactly the same settings as me?
*4k30/16:9/main camera
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry my mistake. I was looking for crop the wrong way. Yes cropping still exists with stabilisation on.
It's a pity there's no shortcut button to enable and disable while in viewfinder? If recording while eg. walking, stabilisation really makes a big difference. Otherwise I agree, I prefer it disabled overall.
For the S7 (and I think S9+), I actually disabled video stabilisation as I didn't think it actually had any noticeable benefits, and it tended to cause more "micro-jitters". For S21 Ultra, it seems to do a pretty good job at stabilising though.
babyboy3265 said:
Well im also on the April update and there's definitely about 20% cropping...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, I didnt ever notice that, lol. I never take stabilization off, but I'll try later with and without.
BuPL said:
Oh, I didnt ever notice that, lol. I never take stabilization off, but I'll try later with and without.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, and just to clarify, you can test it by switching from "Photo" mode to "Video" mode, while using the same aspect ratio for both.
Your photos with examples helped me thank you
Can someone give me S21 Ultra stock camera apk

Question Defect or normal - ultra wide raw quality

Hi, bought the phone 2 days ago, because it's not with 888, it's not with curved display and has a ultra wide camera with AF and macro capabilities with raw support.
To my surprise, the quality of the raw file from the ultra wide is worse than from the periscope - there are some strange bright dots when you zoom in to 100%, which lead to overall bad quality of the ready image. I guess they are the phase focus pixels, but they shouldn't be visible without any heavy editing.
So, is it just me, or the problem is global, so I know how to proceed with this? I'm leaving a crop depicting the problem.
Are you sure the ultra wide angle has AF? but yeah it looks weird...
Qidamin said:
Are you sure the ultra wide angle has AF? but yeah it looks weird...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why I chose this phone, for the af of the ultra wide.
I don't see it mentioned anywhere but as you have the phone you should know it better than me!
bo6o said:
That's why I chose this phone, for the af of the ultra wide.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right, the Edge 20 review on GSMArena mentions the AF for wide angle. A good thing, but it's strange that the ultra wide angle pictures seem a bit blurry then. Did you try with Gcam?
Not yet.
Qidamin said:
You are right, the Edge 20 review on GSMArena mentions the AF for wide angle. A good thing, but it's strange that the ultra wide angle pictures seem a bit blurry then. Did you try with Gcam?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried gcam, same story...
Which Gcam version you use? Try enabling Sabre and see if it makes a difference.
I tried the latest bsg, but removed it, cause the results weren't satisfactory or better than using the stock app as a real camera.
bo6o said:
I tried the latest bsg, but removed it, cause the results weren't satisfactory or better than using the stock app as a real camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey did you manage to solve this issue? Any suggestions for the lackluster RAW outputs from the stock camera app??
The battle is legendary. Still no success defeating the defect. If it is a demozaicing problem, Motorola should fix it.
bo6o said:
The battle is legendary. Still no success defeating the defect. If it is a demozaicing problem, Motorola should fix it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THanks for the reply. I wonder how happy you are overall with the cameras? I've found that the front facing one is quite dark and has WB issues. In general the photos coming out of the stock camera seem riddled with artifacts and oversharpened.
sazinas said:
THanks for the reply. I wonder how happy you are overall with the cameras? I've found that the front facing one is quite dark and has WB issues. In general the photos coming out of the stock camera seem riddled with artifacts and oversharpened.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera Is great as I see in reviews from owners and websites .
I don't even bother shooting in jpg, this is Motorola and they suck in camera performance and resolution logic.
But, I shoot raw, which is possible even with the selfie cam, and after a minute of editing I get sharp and impressive images, and that's why I bought it - the sensors itself are quite capable. If I find a solution to the problem with the ultrawide, the phone is a keeper...
fire159 said:
Camera Is great as I see in reviews from owners and websites .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually own it. Reviews and (average) owners don't understand what we're talking about. Some offence.
bo6o said:
I don't even bother shooting in jpg, this is Motorola and they suck in camera performance and resolution logic.
But, I shoot raw, which is possible even with the selfie cam, and after a minute of editing I get sharp and impressive images, and that's why I bought it - the sensors itself are quite capable. If I find a solution to the problem with the ultrawide, the phone is a keeper...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hate the selfie cam and when video calling tho.... I look like a waterpainting and tanned
sazinas said:
I hate the selfie cam and when video calling tho.... I look like a waterpainting and tanned
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Learn to make your own jpg and you'll be able to see the dirt in your wrinkles on the selfies.
bo6o said:
I don't even bother shooting in jpg, this is Motorola and they suck in camera performance and resolution logic.
But, I shoot raw, which is possible even with the selfie cam, and after a minute of editing I get sharp and impressive images, and that's why I bought it - the sensors itself are quite capable. If I find a solution to the problem with the ultrawide, the phone is a keeper...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you try Google cam ?
fire159 said:
Have you try Google cam ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Answered already here. Jpg from phones and actual cameras suck. The raw from gcam is also worse than using the phone as a real camera. Here's an example, learn photography if you expect miracles from a tiny sensor...
bo6o said:
Answered already here. Jpg from phones and actual cameras suck. The raw from gcam is also worse than using the phone as a real camera. Here's an example, learn photography if you expect miracles from a tiny sensor...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hasli's LMC Google camera mod seems to be working better with the wide angle cam (no artifacts)

Question One ui 4.0, camera lower quality?

So, I noticed after I updated to one ui 4 (android 12) the camera app got a lot softer and more.. *blurry* with the 39x and 100x zoom. Pics attached for reference I don't even need to explain which is which
anyone else with similar issues?
Is this the Snapdragon or Exynos?
Taken yesterday evenig. S20U, exynos and 100x zoom. Android 12 stable.
Took mine today, 30x. One UI 4
Sky33 said:
Took mine today, 30x. One UI 4
View attachment 5462877
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems not be true as the moon phase is now full moon - yours is not....
this is my with stable A12, exynos
My model is Snapdragon G9980 One UI 4.0 Beta3.
The picture quality of photos in low-light scenes is very poor
the resolution of the shooting font symbols is very vague
and the noise is more than the old version, and even not as good as the Snapdragon version Note10+
the difference in sensor size should not be such a big step backward.
I was disappointed to see the negative camera optimization on Samsung phones.
OnnoJ said:
Seems not be true as the moon phase is now full moon - yours is not....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There was lot of clouds yesterday here so yeah
Here is my shot. While it does not look so processed as OP's, it's not the most clear either. I find it to be absolutely the same as the photos I took in Android 11. I think the blurry photo taken by xSpartacusx might have been the result of the zoom lens not being activated or maybe the phone was not stabilized enough.
I updated through Odin with the official version found on Frija. Here are my software specs:
Randi03 said:
Is this the Snapdragon or Exynos?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon SM-G998U
but yea, before the update when I would take a photo I could literally see the lines on the surface of the moon and the craters. Now it's really fuzzy.. I genuinely think that with the android 12 update the processing methods changed or the software bugged up the way the camera works

Categories

Resources