Database Develop

Low 3D MARK scores post yours.

So, i'm getting a really low 3D Mark score for a "gaming" device like this, i think that Nvidia do something wrong with the Tegra 3 GPU, i got it running at 650Mhz and i get like 3000 points... other devices on the same range get a lot better scores... what to do to get better 3D on our 4X?

Well this is my score...I'm not sure our much other devices get, but from the results our O4X is in the same range as the Note 2...so I guess that those results aren't that bad...
Btw I used the official CM10.1.0 rom with stock cm kernel...
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app

JAsko_san said:
Well this is my score...I'm not sure our much other devices get, but from the results our O4X is in the same range as the Note 2...so I guess that those results aren't that bad...
Btw I used the official CM10.1.0 rom with stock cm kernel...
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think that is a better score that i do have with V20C and iodak kernel, i will try another kernel and compare...

DankoFGL said:
So, i'm getting a really low 3D Mark score for a "gaming" device like this, i think that Nvidia do something wrong with the Tegra 3 GPU, i got it running at 650Mhz and i get like 3000 points... other devices on the same range get a lot better scores... what to do to get better 3D on our 4X?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you running anything else? I ran at stock speeds (no overclock anything) and got 4100-4200 on five straight runs. I have no idea what a normal score for the Tegra 3 is supposed to be.

I get same result. My kernel nothing touched from defaults.
I think it is ok all tegra 3 devices get similar scores one x+ gets about 3800.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app

for benchmarking, stock rom > aosp rom > cm based roms > other roms, from my experience. even when you bring custom kernels to the table, it's the same.
edit:
f.e., on quadrant, stock with custom kernels could go around 6100, aosp rom we have went to 5500, cm based went up to 4800, while others went up to 4500.

Stock with what customs? Im using iodak is there a begter kernel? Mc4 lags as hell even at 520mhz gpu a 1600mhz cpu
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta

DankoFGL said:
Stock with what customs? Im using iodak is there a begter kernel? Mc4 lags as hell even at 520mhz gpu a 1600mhz cpu
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we have like four available kernels for stock, try all four and see which one runs the fastest. as for mc4, i could swear i saw people reporting playing that with no lag... strange

DankoFGL said:
Stock with what customs? Im using iodak is there a begter kernel? Mc4 lags as hell even at 520mhz gpu a 1600mhz cpu
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried uninstalling all these overclock softwares and testing without them?

Flying_Bear said:
we have like four available kernels for stock, try all four and see which one runs the fastest. as for mc4, i could swear i saw people reporting playing that with no lag... strange
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe the problem is that i use the full graphics modded APK... and not the tegra 3 that i bought via playstore... also, Dead space lags too... mabye a kernel related problem, i will flash the rom and kernel again and see...

DankoFGL said:
Maybe the problem is that i use the full graphics modded APK... and not the tegra 3 that i bought via playstore... also, Dead space lags too... mabye a kernel related problem, i will flash the rom and kernel again and see...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, that might be the issue. unfortunately, tegra3 in our phone didn't quite live up to my expectations, which sux since even nexus7 has better performance than our phone. didn't try dead space either, so cant really tell. i did try vice city and nfs, they ran quite good on stock for me.

Flying_Bear said:
yeah, that might be the issue. unfortunately, tegra3 in our phone didn't quite live up to my expectations, which sux since even nexus7 has better performance than our phone. didn't try dead space either, so cant really tell. i did try vice city and nfs, they ran quite good on stock for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i will download again from google play and come back and tell
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta

Flying_Bear said:
yeah, that might be the issue. unfortunately, tegra3 in our phone didn't quite live up to my expectations, which sux since even nexus7 has better performance than our phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does it? 3DMark benchmarks disagree.
I did manage to reproduce the OP's results though. I installed TegraOverclock and suddenly my 3DMark results were the same as the ones he posted. If I uninstall it I get the attached image.

Subtleone said:
Does it? 3DMark benchmarks disagree.
I did manage to reproduce the OP's results though. I installed TegraOverclock and suddenly my 3DMark results were the same as the ones he posted. If I uninstall it I get the attached image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
average results for nexus 7 are better than those for o4x, unfortunately.
http://community.futuremark.com/hardware/mobile/LG+Optimus+4X+HD/review

Flying_Bear said:
average results for nexus 7 are better than those for o4x, unfortunately.
http://community.futuremark.com/hardware/mobile/LG+Optimus+4X+HD/review
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might wish to see the image I posted on a non-overclocked phone.

Subtleone said:
You might wish to see the image I posted on a non-overclocked phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and i can post my image of benchmark with 3200 score, overclocked . since my score is as valid as yours, we might as well take the average that's on the website - and the average number says that nexus7 performs better than o4x.
on the other hand, i dont game much these days, and the games i do run, run well enough. so, it's just a benchmark, a number; however i have expected tegra3 in this phone to have higher number than tablet with practically identical chip in it

Flying_Bear said:
and i can post my image of benchmark with 3200 score, overclocked . since my score is as valid as yours, we might as well take the average that's on the website - and the average number says that nexus7 performs better than o4x.
on the other hand, i dont game much these days, and the games i do run, run well enough. so, it's just a benchmark, a number; however i have expected tegra3 in this phone to have higher number than tablet with practically identical chip in it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While it is indeed just a number, it does actually measure something. Unless my configuration is somehow exploiting it specifically to achieve those scores, you might wish to see why you underscore so much and fix it. The phones are identical after all, and no one is talking about fancy coolers or the like as exists in PCs.

Subtleone said:
While it is indeed just a number, it does actually measure something. Unless my configuration is somehow exploiting it specifically to achieve those scores, you might wish to see why you underscore so much and fix it. The phones are identical after all, and no one is talking about fancy coolers or the like as exists in PCs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did some testing, and may have the answer for you. The vanilla iodak sets the CPU to 1.7GHz and the 3D and 2D GPU to 520MHz, all of which are maximum values, hence the very good 3DMark scores. If you use an app such as TegraOverclock and set those values you should get the same scores or at least very close to them. I did notice that any attempt to apply an overclock to the GPU was instantly rejected. If I tried to set it to 600MHz it was immediately set at... 300MHz, so as far as I can tell, 520 is the highest possible.

I
Subtleone said:
I did some testing, and may have the answer for you. The vanilla iodak sets the CPU to 1.7GHz and the 3D and 2D GPU to 520MHz, all of which are maximum values, hence the very good 3DMark scores. If you use an app such as TegraOverclock and set those values you should get the same scores or at least very close to them. I did notice that any attempt to apply an overclock to the GPU was instantly rejected. If I tried to set it to 600MHz it was immediately set at... 300MHz, so as far as I can tell, 520 is the highest possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it puts to 300mhz because is the minimun, in 520mhz the minimun is 200...
Edit: flashed back V20C, getting 3570 stock, i will flash Iodak again.. and test... without donwloading tegra overclock...
Edit again, this is with iodak v6 stock settings it seems that thegra overclock app reduces the performance of our devices...

Stock kernel has its gpu running at 200mhz base, scaling up to 416. Custom kernels can increase that, which leads to higher scores. I got 4k by increasing gpu to 520mhz. I don't see how just having tegra oc installed could break anything

Highest Antutu Scores EVER on a Huawei P8 Lite!

BIGGEST SCORES EVER IN ANTUTU 6.2 !!!
News: I touched 50.000 points in latest Antutu version with the same tweaks from below, just that downscale texture is disabled.
News: @HaiderHady has touched 40.000 POINTS IN ANTUTU! Congratulations!
Code:
[I][U]OLDER POST[/U][/I]
Same settings as below--
Ran Antutu 5.7.1 and...
But first,[U] I know[/U] this is not newest Antutu but at that time when the older biggest score on (35186) was on Lollipop, same as now EMUI 3.1 B204, in Q1-Q4 2015 there was no Antutu 6.2. All 35XXX scores were made on 5.7.1 of Antutu, and in dates differing from Q1 2015 to Q1 2016, where there was no EMUI 4.
THE SCORE IS..... (drum beats...) 42.474!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOWOWOwowowow. But, don't get too excited, the resolution scaling and everithing was turned down or off to get that performance, the kernel needs A LOT of optimizations to get that performance
~This is just a proof of concept that you can squeeze such performance for such of a low-budget device. It is just 1000 points far from a Samsung Galaxy Note 4, but that I'm sure it's ran just like this, with no extreme downscalling~
There will be a screenshot, just squeeze your eyes and see that is for real 42.474 and it beats the Note 4 in some categories
Rooted, GlTools installed went to antutu bench and 3d bench and put:
-Anti Aliasing disabled
-Lower render resolution 0.25x
-Force 16Bit Rendering
-Optimize GLSL shaders
-Texture decompression disabled
-Texture recompression disabled
-Downscale textures 1x1
-Half-Float texture hack
~Other settings:
-Force GPU redering on in dev. options
Code:
[U][I]OLDER POST[/I][/U]
The score: 33055
I will let screenshots later. Why? I want to test one more time with the power management option on "Performance" because that was on "intelligent" and the battery was on red indicator when I ran the benchmarks (>20)
EDIT: Got even higher scores!-- Disabled force 4xMSAA -> Got 334XX something
Will let screenshots

XTutorials said:
Done everything possible to get highest scores possible on EMUI 4.0.3 B596 modded by - @persona78 because he put and some nice build.prop tweaks in there
Rooted, GlTools installed went to antutu bench and 3d bench and put:
-Anti Aliasing disabled
-Lower render resolution 0.25x
-Force 16Bit Rendering
-Optimize GLSL shaders
-Texture decompression disabled
-Texture recompression disabled
-Downscale textures 1x1
-Half-Float texture hack
~Other settings:
-Force GPU redering on in dev. options
-Force MSAA4x on in dev. options
The score: 33055
I will let screenshots later. Why? I want to test one more time with the power management option on "Performance" because that was on "intelligent" and the battery was on red indicator when I ran the benchmarks (>20)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why use 4XMSAA...... It decreases performance as it is an anti aliasing option ....

P.S. -I will never use a custom kernel on EMUI because the device becomes slower
-THIS IS NOT THE HIGHEST SCORES OF A P8LITE! The Highest score is on EMUI 3.1, not 4, maybe I will test and EMUI 3.1 and try to get an even higher score (but I don't know if there was used an custom kernel or not)

HaiderHady said:
Why use 4XMSAA...... It decreases performance as it is an anti aliasing option ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm... ok then I will try without MSAA 4x and with performance power option to see what scores I can get.

Check OP for screenshots, and if you know some performance tweaks tell me!

XTutorials said:
Done everything possible to get highest scores possible on EMUI 4.0.3 B596 modded by - @persona78 because he put and some nice build.prop tweaks in there
Rooted, GlTools installed went to antutu bench and 3d bench and put:
-Anti Aliasing disabled
-Lower render resolution 0.25x
-Force 16Bit Rendering
-Optimize GLSL shaders
-Texture decompression disabled
-Texture recompression disabled
-Downscale textures 1x1
-Half-Float texture hack
~Other settings:
-Force GPU redering on in dev. options
-Force MSAA4x on in dev. options
The score: 33055
I will let screenshots later. Why? I want to test one more time with the power management option on "Performance" because that was on "intelligent" and the battery was on red indicator when I ran the benchmarks (>20)
EDIT: Got even higher scores!-- Disabled force 4xMSAA -> Got 334XX something
Will let screenshots
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great!
But all performance a loose the beatty is not good in my point of view that is way i don't turn of the graphics options.
.

Flashed EMUI 3.1. Will test tomorrow. But I have to mention there are no build.prop tweaks, hope the prformance is not lost

By
XTutorials said:
Flashed EMUI 3.1. Will test tomorrow. But I have to mention there are no build.prop tweaks, hope the prformance is not lost
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Emui 3.1 is android 5, it will have a better score, 35000 more or less.
Android 6 is "more heavy".

persona78 said:
Emui 3.1 is android 5, it will have a better score, 35000 more or less.
Android 6 is "more heavy".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH, i got just 28000 with Force GPU rendering in dev. options. I searched on google Huawei P8 Lite Antutu and went to pictures and almost every photo was saying "35XXX", but I saw the scores are on Antutu 5.7.1-5.7.3 .Maybe the Antutu is "more heavy"
I will re-run the Benchmark with GlTools and everything on disabled and see what I score.
Still, I feel that EMUI 3.1 is a lot smoother than 4, I don't know why the scores a lower
EDIT: In detail, the score is 28802

XTutorials said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH, i got just 28000 with Force GPU rendering in dev. options. I searched on google Huawei P8 Lite Antutu and went to pictures and almost every photo was saying "35XXX", but I saw the scores are on Antutu 5.7.1-5.7.3 .Maybe the Antutu is "more heavy"
I will re-run the Benchmark with GlTools and everything on disabled and see what I score.
Still, I feel that EMUI 3.1 is a lot smoother than 4, I don't know why the scores a lower
EDIT: In detail, the score is 28802
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the default.
All that benchmark app only use 4 cores, they can't stress enough the cpu to bring all 4 cores in Huawei.
For example my old 4 cores Alcatel reach the same values and it have the same cpu speed.
90% of the apps only need one core to work so...
.

XTutorials said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH, i got just 28000 with Force GPU rendering in dev. options. I searched on google Huawei P8 Lite Antutu and went to pictures and almost every photo was saying "35XXX", but I saw the scores are on Antutu 5.7.1-5.7.3 .Maybe the Antutu is "more heavy"
I will re-run the Benchmark with GlTools and everything on disabled and see what I score.
Still, I feel that EMUI 3.1 is a lot smoother than 4, I don't know why the scores a lower
EDIT: In detail, the score is 28802
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let your phone cool down....Charge it to 100℅ and benchmark with charger disconnected and normal mode on in Power Manager.
Remeber to keeo your phone cool while benchmark and disable developer options...
Then give results

HaiderHady said:
Let your phone cool down....Charge it to 100℅ and benchmark with charger disconnected and normal mode on in Power Manager.
Remeber to keeo your phone cool while benchmark and disable developer options...
Then give results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Challenge accepted...

HaiderHady said:
Let your phone cool down....Charge it to 100℅ and benchmark with charger disconnected and normal mode on in Power Manager.
Remeber to keeo your phone cool while benchmark and disable developer options...
Then give results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean normal(performance) or inteligent?

XTutorials said:
You mean normal(performance) or inteligent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Normal one....
Its like performance mode
---------- Post added at 02:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:26 PM ----------
XTutorials said:
You mean normal(performance) or inteligent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you please tell your scoresss.....
Or are they the one in first post 42xxx

Just asking if your all cores ever reached like....full potential...As follows

HaiderHady said:
Just asking if your all cores ever reached like....full potential...As follows
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for non-responding, done how you told me, with no gltools tweak and got a score of 28308. I'm seeing that 3D scores ale lower than usual, and a small difference in other categories. I'm sure if we would've got OpenGL 3.0 we would get a lot more in scores, because unlocks the "marooned" test
P.S. The 42.XXX score is achieved in Antutu 5.3.1 with gltools tweaks, the scores I gave you are in 6.2, with no gltools tweak and dev. options turned off

Default scores are based in 4 cores only...

persona78 said:
Default scores are based in 4 cores only...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup,,,,,,I noticed
Before antutu all my 8 cores were running but after test.....Only four were...other four turned off
.
.
.
.
Strange

HaiderHady said:
Yup,,,,,,I noticed
Before antutu all my 8 cores were running but after test.....Only four were...other four turned off
.
.
.
.
Strange
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
persona78 said:
Default scores are based in 4 cores only...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy fukin shyttt..... om facking god. Finnaly solved the problem with 3D score. TRIPLED THE SCORE with a simple tweak, what I am going to post later this evening.
Will let some screenshots, too.
3D: right on the edge, 6000 points. Massive!
Now, I just need to figure out that CPU problem. Maybe you, @persona78 you can help me. It is this problem not related to a build.prop thing? (I'm asking you because BetoOS build.prop tweaks. Thanks!)

XTutorials said:
Holy fukin shyttt..... om facking god. Finnaly solved the problem with 3D score. TRIPLED THE SCORE with a simple tweak, what I am going to post later this evening.
Will let some screenshots, too.
3D: right on the edge, 6000 points. Massive!
Now, I just need to figure out that CPU problem. Maybe you, @persona78 you can help me. It is this problem not related to a build.prop thing? (I'm asking you because BetoOS build.prop tweaks. Thanks!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is a kernel thing to optimise battery life.
.

Did I just ... break world record ?!

I was testing the new OOS 5.0.3 , Benchmarking and stuff
And I saw my Antutu score , a whopping 194k on my 3T !
I'm running on ElementalX kernel 2.42 + 2.18 Ghz on cores + GPU on performance governor but still this score is way too high for a 3T
Did I just break world record for 3T or something ?!
[edit] : I would post the screenshot but since I just created my account today XDA won't let me post links

The highest recorded score is 265K on the GS9+. You're like at #27 on the scale.

thes3usa said:
The highest recorded score is 265K on the GS9+. You're like at #27 on the scale.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He is talking about OnePlus 3T only

BitBleed said:
I was testing the new OOS 5.0.3 , Benchmarking and stuff
And I saw my Antutu score , a whopping 194k on my 3T !
I'm running on ElementalX kernel 2.42 + 2.18 Ghz on cores + GPU on performance governor but still this score is way too high for a 3T
Did I just break world record for 3T or something ?!
[edit] : I would post the screenshot but since I just created my account today XDA won't let me post links
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really ?Thats great.How is the battery life with that kernel?

nickpapeir said:
Really ?Thats great.How is the battery life with that kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Battery life is OK , but not awesome

BitBleed said:
Thanks
Battery life is OK , but not awesome
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you change anything else or you use the kernel as it is?

nickpapeir said:
Did you change anything else or you use the kernel as it is?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just disabled Fsync and used performance governor for GPU and MAX OC 2.42 and 2.18 Ghz on CPU cores but still , The score is just too high for a 3T
It might be the new 5.0.3 OOS ROM

BitBleed said:
The score is just too high for a 3T
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, why? SD821 is powerful CPU. Especially if you set performance governor, so you forced the CPU to set its clocks on highest speed.

przemcio510 said:
No, why? SD821 is powerful CPU. Especially if you set performance governor, so you forced the CPU to set its clocks on highest speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU wasn't on performance governor . Only GPU was on Performance

Very low geekbench4 score and low fps in games.

Hello, as I mentioned I am facing low fps and poor performance in pubg and when I ran the geekbench test it games 1k in singlecore and 3k in multicore test. I am using stock oos oreo with blushark( I don't remember the name lol) kernal with unlocked bootloader. It also shows only 3 cores idk why, and the score is very low compared to other scores on browser.geekbench which shows 2k for single core and 5.5k for multicore. Please help!

I'll try to keep updating my research on this.
I did a hard reset and installed omni rom 8.1 which got me a 80% increase in single core benchmark (~1850) and 25% increase in multi core benchmark(~3925). Single core benchmarks are now around the same as of what others test results are showing in browser.geekbench, but multicore benchmark is still less. :/

Aah I settled on omni ROM 8.1 with caesium kernel and disabled touchboost and changed big cluster governer to ondemand from conservative. I now could play pubg smoothly on 1280x720p with high graphics and extreme fps thanks to gfx tool app before I couldn't even play the game with so smooth graphics and 956x500 blah blah resolution. I noticed the CPU would throttle down and reduce the frequencies for big cluster to like ~1530mhz and little to ~1350 MHz but the gameplay was good.

Assassin P780 said:
I'll try to keep updating my research on this.
I did a hard reset and installed omni rom 8.1 which got me a 80% increase in single core benchmark (~1850) and 25% increase in multi core benchmark(~3925). Single core benchmarks are now around the same as of what others test results are showing in browser.geekbench, but multicore benchmark is still less. :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock kernel will give you the best results IMO. Try the Bane kernel, is good too

nickpapeir said:
Stock kernel will give you the best results IMO. Try the Bane kernel, is good too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will try that too! Thanks!
The stock kernel gave me the above result 1850 singlecore and 3900 for multicore and after caesium kernel I got 4050 in multicore and 1650 in single core. But I don't how to go back to stock kernel without reinstalling the rom :/

Assassin P780 said:
... But I don't how to go back to stock kernel without reinstalling the rom :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use a file manager, such as Solid Explorer, to copy boot.img from the ROM zip file and flash it in TWRP by selecting Image in the install option.
Sent from my OnePlus 3T using XDA Labs

Thanks to BillGross
I am back on the stock kernel of omni rom 8.1 which gives me a average score of 1900 in single core and 3900 in multicore tests and pubg runs great on hdr 720p 60fps although it doesn't run at full 60 fps and there are some stutters here and there but gameplay is very good.
Simple fact: oos sucks except its face unlock.

Leeco le 2 Benchmarks and performance

I know that our 2016 le 2 is not going to break any land speed records but I'm just curious about what figures it can post. I am a fan of benchmark scores and before you crucify me, yeah! I know benchmarks don't show real world performance. But would it hurt to run them? FOR SCIENCE??
Anyway, let's get away from the politics a bit and share the best benchmark scores we've managed on our lowly le 2. It doesn't matter if it is the famous Antutu, Geekbench, 3DMark, benchmark pi, a1 SD bench, or whatever you had a go at. Just share it here for the world to see.
Sharing Format
Please attach a screenshot of whichever benchmark you ran and the score you got. Also tell us which ROM you were using, if you had installed any custom kernel, overclocks, and any other tweaks that could have led you to that marvelous score.
Example:
I recently did a 3DMark test on my le 2 (find the screenshot(s)) attached. My phone is running SmallEUI version 3, illusion kernel v. 2.5, and I had all cores locked on performance. I also had a fan blowing at my phone for a cooling breeze.

PE 9.0
Antutu: imgur.com/KTjVIit(dot)png
Geekbench: imgur.com/wyL1Vfs(dot)png

hyperactivex01 said:
PE 9.0
Antutu: imgur.com/KTjVIit(dot)png
Geekbench: imgur.com/wyL1Vfs(dot)png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice scores. My phone on PE 9 scored 67k on Antutu. Must have been a glitch. Were you running any mods?
Edit:Since you cannot post links yet I've taken your images and put them here to help anyone viewing this in one stop. Hope you don't mind.

Nop. Immediately after flashing rom ran the tests. Is your phone new? Which version, x526?
---------- Post added at 09:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:31 PM ----------
3d mark: imgur.com/Bw0NtF1(dot)png

hyperactivex01 said:
Nop. Immediately after flashing rom ran the tests. Is your phone new? Which version, x526?
---------- Post added at 09:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:31 PM ----------
3d mark: imgur.com/Bw0NtF1(dot)png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My phone is less than 2 months old. I must have done something wrong to get such a low score. Your 3D bench looks like mine when I was running smallEUI. I'm installing Arrow OS Pie today. Someone recommended it to me so I am going to try it today.
Edit: again reposted your photos from imgur.

Mine is week and half. I really want to flash bunch of roms, but this one just works too good so I can't justify it. Have fun and good luck. Btw I noticed in other threads other people having ~70k score, so it's not just you.

hyperactivex01 said:
Mine is week and half. I really want to flash bunch of roms, but this one just works too good so I can't justify it. Have fun and good luck. Btw I noticed in other threads other people having ~70k score, so it's not just you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yesterday I tried Arrow OS pie and Lineage 16. They had same problems as most other pie ROMS so I removed them both. My phone is a x526, the 3/64 GB version. On Arrow OS with overload kernel, I got 110k Antutu. Lineage got 105k with stock kernel. But performance is nothing without stability. Especially the camera because my phone is a daily driver. How's your camera working?
Sent from my Le X526 using XDA Labs

twistyplain said:
Yesterday I tried Arrow OS pie and Lineage 16. They had same problems as most other pie ROMS so I removed them both. My phone is a x526, the 3/64 GB version. On Arrow OS with overload kernel, I got 110k Antutu. Lineage got 105k with stock kernel. But performance is nothing without stability. Especially the camera because my phone is a daily driver. How's your camera working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, 110k. My brothers rn5 got 115k lol. Latest PE is great. It's stable, I don't notice any UI lag. Camera used to close before when trying to record or night mode, especially if I was in a dark room, but now never. I wiped cache before and after dirty flashing update.

Mine is 3/32gb version

Here's mine, I'm using Havoc OS 9 latest build with Overload Kernel
Antutu: imgur(dot)com/DkuXVf6

eydrianji said:
Here's mine, I'm using Havoc OS 9 latest build with Overload Kernel
Antutu: imgur(dot)com/DkuXVf6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
111k is quite impressive. I'm pretty sure we cannot do much better.

twistyplain said:
111k is quite impressive. I'm pretty sure we cannot do much better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure overclocking will work but that will ruin its stability. But for the sake of benchmark, I guess we can push higher scores

eydrianji said:
I'm pretty sure overclocking will work but that will ruin its stability. But for the sake of benchmark, I guess we can push higher scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, overclocking works but just a little bit. Stability goes out the window as soon as you start overclocking the SD652. Since it's a 28nm fab chip, it can't go much faster without catastrophic failure.
I read that according to Qualcomm it can do a maximum of 2.2 ghz at 16nm fab process. That's just 400 mhz faster than the current max speed.

twistyplain said:
111k is quite impressive. I'm pretty sure we cannot do much better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Revengeos+overload kernel(v4.21)+truwhitemod(v1.3)=117k-118k

maxvikakosa said:
Revengeos+overload kernel(v4.21)+truwhitemod(v1.3)=117k-118k
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please post a screenshot of this result. It doesn't mean that much unless it's verifiable.

twistyplain said:
Please post a screenshot of this result. It doesn't mean that much unless it's verifiable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
imgur(dot)com/ZERmCb5

maxvikakosa said:
imgur(dot)com/ZERmCb5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you get such a high memory speed? Is the phone stable at that performance level?

After many and many test ... this is my result:
Havoc 2.8 (pie)+ some tweak to thermal engine = 119k-120k on antutu score
Havoc 2.8 (pie) + illuminate kernel + some tweak with smartpack kernel manager + some tweak to thermal engine = 120k-121k on antutu score
If u want more info: ask here and i share screenshot of antutu score and my configurartion and mod to obtain this score.
Peace!

From where I can download illuminate kernel.please provide the link .