Related
1. The number one smartphone maker, Samsung, provides AT&T users with the ability to flash custom roms. Not HTC. And the VIVID is locked does tight on AT&T.
2. "There has been overwhelmingly customer feedback that people want access to open bootloaders on HTC phones. I want you to know that we've listened. Today, I'm confirming we will no longer be locking the bootloaders on our devices. Thanks for your passion, support and patience," Peter Chou, CEO of HTC, May 26, 2011 - http://www.facebook.com/HTC/posts/10150307320018084
3. #2 was a boldfaced LIE on the part of Peter Chou, CEO of HTC. Since then, HTC has selectively unlocked bootloaders - blaming carriers when their competitors are providing devices that are pretty much wide open. This same device on another carrier is unlockable. That promise has clearly been broken.
4. The common denominator is HTC, not AT&T. Either HTC is gutless or lying, either way, it's THEIR devices that are not unlocked and not the #1 Android supplier.
Don't buy these devices if you want a typical Android experience where you have a choice of firmwares to run. Even if you chose to stay stock with an unlockable bootloader, that choice would be YOURS. Do you really want to give it up?
Join me in boycotting this device. If you already bought one, bring it back to AT&T (You can still choose something else) and tell them WHY.
Personally, I am done buying ANY HTC devices until this policy changes. This BS is getting OLD.
Hey attn1, thats not the only reason I would bring it back. I'm having horrible data connections if any at all.
I didnt like the sgs2, so would you recommend the motorola atrix 2?
I cannot believe I traded my Galaxy S2 for this phone.
SysAdmNj said:
Hey attn1, thats not the only reason I would bring it back. I'm having horrible data connections if any at all.
I didnt like the sgs2, so would you recommend the motorola atrix 2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right now, I think only Samsung and LG are getting it right.
CEaton said:
I cannot believe I traded my Galaxy S2 for this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
attn1 said:
Right now, I think only Samsung and LG are getting it right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would try the samsung galaxy skyrocket but they are having the same lte data connection issues for non lte areas apparently.
attn1 said:
1. The number one smartphone maker, Samsung, provides AT&T users with the ability to flash custom roms. Not HTC. And the VIVID is locked does tight on AT&T.
2. "There has been overwhelmingly customer feedback that people want access to open bootloaders on HTC phones. I want you to know that we've listened. Today, I'm confirming we will no longer be locking the bootloaders on our devices. Thanks for your passion, support and patience," Peter Chou, CEO of HTC, May 26, 2011 - http://www.facebook.com/HTC/posts/10150307320018084
3. #2 was a boldfaced LIE on the part of Peter Chou, CEO of HTC. Since then, HTC has selectively unlocked bootloaders - blaming carriers when their competitors are providing devices that are pretty much wide open. This same device on another carrier is unlockable. That promise has clearly been broken.
4. The common denominator is HTC, not AT&T. Either HTC is gutless or lying, either way, it's THEIR devices that are not unlocked and not the #1 Android supplier.
Don't buy these devices if you want a typical Android experience where you have a choice of firmwares to run. Even if you chose to stay stock with an unlockable bootloader, that choice would be YOURS. Do you really want to give it up?
Join me in boycotting this device. If you already bought one, bring it back to AT&T (You can still choose something else) and tell them WHY.
Personally, I am done buying ANY HTC devices until this policy changes. This BS is getting OLD.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What??? Why is the HTC Raider's bootloader unlockable on the htcdev site then?
edit: You're a smart guy and I'm sure you can understand the inherent risks of allowing an unlocked bootloader and custom roms (would you download a version of Windows from some torrent site and just trust it). That said HTC is merely making you accept responsibility if you do unlock that bootloader. It seems to me as if ATT is the one not allowing that since The HTC Holiday on Rogers (Raider) is able to be unlocked via their tool, but ATT's (Vivid) isn't.
I will join you in this boycott.
I currently have an unlocked i9100 I'm using, and I was SERIOUSLY considering picking up one of these because a) I want to get on an unlimited LTE plan asap as I assume ATT being the douche-nozzles they are will surely take it away soon and b) for use as an LTE modem essentially since I have such a hard time getting data service in downtown chicago. Not anymore! (unfortunately, I also can't justify buying the skyrocket when I already have the gsII, would have been fun to have something different to play with)
I agree, this bootloader locking is BS. Samsung has phones on every carrier, none of them with locked bootloaders. Even my mom's Charge on Verizon (gag) is unlocked.
Well crap! This isn't what I'd like to have seen from you attn1, but at the same time, I'm sure you're tired of holding ppl's hand to try and root/s-off their phones w/your tool.
Le sigh, I was lookin forward to this and hopefully using another fine piece of attn1 software.
rquinn19 said:
What??? Why is the HTC Raider's bootloader unlockable on the htcdev site then?
edit: You're a smart guy and I'm sure you can understand the inherent risks of allowing an unlocked bootloader and custom roms (would you download a version of Windows from some torrent site and just trust it). That said HTC is merely making you accept responsibility if you do unlock that bootloader. It seems to me as if ATT is the one not allowing that since The HTC Holiday on Rogers (Raider) is able to be unlocked via their tool, but ATT's (Vivid) isn't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, Samsung and LG devices are open on AT&T. HTC and Motorola are not. There is no option "to accept responsibility" - which would be fine by me. Please go back and re-read the OP. HTC is not delivering what they can - or what they promised.
SysAdmNj said:
I would try the samsung galaxy skyrocket but they are having the same lte data connection issues for non lte areas apparently.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would not use LTE until it is more fully deployed anyway.
SysAdmNj said:
I would try the samsung galaxy skyrocket but they are having the same lte data connection issues for non lte areas apparently.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure what connection issues you are referring to. This is the first I've heard anyone mention that.
I live in an LTE area but work in an HSPA area. No connection issues anywhere, regardless of LTE or not.
I have the SkyRocket though.
attn1 said:
No, Samsung and LG devices are open on AT&T. HTC and Motorola are not. There is no option "to accept responsibility" - which would be fine by me. Please go back and re-read the OP. HTC is not delivering what they can - or what they promised.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read your post. I understand what you're saying. Apparently you don't understand what I'm saying. I know what HTC promised and realize they haven't lived up to that promise. They are offering a means to unlocking it though. Carriers have to agree though and you have to accept some agreement as well.
HTC's Bootloader Unlock Site
This site works for the Raider, not for our Vivid. Gives a CID (carrier) error.
rquinn19 said:
I read your post. I understand what you're saying. Apparently you don't understand what I'm saying. I know what HTC promised and realize they haven't lived up to that promise. They are offering a means to unlocking it though. Carriers have to agree though and you have to accept some agreement as well.
HTC's Bootloader Unlock Site
This site works for the Raider, not for our Vivid. Gives a CID (carrier) error.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, carriers do NOT have to agree, as evidenced by current offerings from Samsung, LG and Sony. HTC is using carriers as a excuse to do what they want anyway. Their competition is not. Regardless of who's issue it is, not buying such a device is the best course of action, and if sales are down significantly, will drive change. Even if it doesn't, anyone lurking around on XDA developers would be infinitely better off with a more open device.
I agree somewhat with you, however things to keep in mind.
1. Accessing the bootloader voids the warranty, so why should AT&T care?
2. Have you contacted HTC as of yet? I have and they said Bootloader shouldn't be locked and if it is ALL devices get an unlock code. I tried to Unlock, and given the device launched on Sunday I am not surprised.
3. HTC is not the only one locking bootloaders, Motorola is FAR WORSE.
Personally I like the phone. I do place custom roms on my devices. As a previous owner of the Droid X and Atrix, I have experienced locked bootloaders.
This phone for me is better than the SGS2. Quirks of the SGS2 Rom with Touch Wiz and not a fully functioning CM yet it wasn't good.
I'l just start off by saying I am not a developer and don't know much about bootloaders and such.. going from a Captivate to the Vivid, I already see a difference in support of development. Is it really this bad?
I'm loving the Vivid as it is, and I HATE stock ROMs, all of them. I just hope that things may change for current Vivid owners.. after all, it's only been two days.
I'm really disappointed with what I'm reading. The Vivid is my first Android device that I've purchased on AT&T, and so far it seems like a great phone. But if devs are saying the device should be boycotted, that doesn't seem like a good sign for future development support.
I don't see what's bad about this device. I'm still going to get this device regardless of what a Dev says .
Edit: And this phone JUST CAME OUT. I do not expect anything within the first week or two. But if it remains like this, i may have to jump on this boycott with you. And i sure as hell don't want to buy another Samsung device
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
I had a Vibrant, and when I switched to AT&T, the Infuse was the only good phone on AT&T (I mainly did not want to give up SAMOLED).
I do not want to get another samsung phone, but if I have to get the skyrocket because of HTC's lies, I will.
Sent from my phone. :3
trell959 said:
I don't see what's bad about this device. I'm still going to get this device regardless of what a Dev says .
Edit: And this phone JUST CAME OUT. I do not expect anything within the first week or two. But if it remains like this, i may have to jump on this boycott with you. And i sure as hell don't want to buy another Samsung device
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. I mean so what if they may have been hypocritical in promising things they have yet to follow up on. At least give it some time. Something is better than nothing.
Ok for 1 I know for a FACT not ALL LG Devices have Unlocked bootloader's considering I Have one so don't go saying that unless you can 100% back that up. Second, I am more than willing to bet AT&T forced HTC to lock the bootloader and I would not be in the least suprised that the new Samsung would be locked down as well considering they are the 1st LTE Devices to be available on AT&T. Regardless though like people said this thing has only been out for less than a freaking week. I am also willing to bet given a month or so HTC will have an Unlock for this device regardless as to what AT&T wants to do.
Big Dawg 23 said:
1. Accessing the bootloader voids the warranty, so why should AT&T care?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true - it may or may not void the warranty, depending on the nature of the problem. That gray area is what HTC fears will cost money. I didn't say AT&T would care about warranty. I said HTC would.
malickie said:
Ok for 1 I know for a FACT not ALL LG Devices have Unlocked bootloader's considering I Have one so don't go saying that unless you can 100% back that up. Second, I am more than willing to bet AT&T forced HTC to lock the bootloader and I would not be in the least suprised that the new Samsung would be locked down as well considering they are the 1st LTE Devices to be available on AT&T. Regardless though like people said this thing has only been out for less than a freaking week. I am also willing to bet given a month or so HTC will have an Unlock for this device regardless as to what AT&T wants to do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Recent phones from LG like the Thrill and the 2GS have been unlockable.
All the recent Samsungs are easily unlockable.
HTC already has an unlock for this device - (on Rogers) and excluded AT&T - one of their largest markets.
Hi, i can buy moto x but seller told me that it has sprint simlock and it has ESN block (i dont know what it is at all). Im from poland and what i wanna know is it can be unlocked to work in gsm in poland? Any way to do this? Flashing custom rom or something like that
The Sprint X is sim locked by default.
Everything I've seen so far about unlocking the Sprint X says you must be a current sprint customer, have the X active on your line, and meet certain conditions (like bills paid, xx months into contract, etc), then Sprint will give you the SIM unlock code.
I've seen many posts of non-Sprint customers buying used Sprint X and being unable to SIM unlock them.
See some of the discussion here -> http://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-x/moto-x-qa/request-to-make-sim-unlock-files-ota-t2639665
I've been bummed on this one as well. No luck here either. I actually met a sprint customer who had it unlocked through sprint but it still didn't pick up anything on AT&T. They are selling for super cheap but there is no point since I have yet to see one unlocked and running on gsm. At least in US.
noobsquared said:
I've been bummed on this one as well. No luck here either. I actually met a sprint customer who had it unlocked through sprint but it still didn't pick up anything on AT&T. They are selling for super cheap but there is no point since I have yet to see one unlocked and running on gsm. At least in US.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sprint will only unlock for international GSM use. You will never be able to use it on domestic carriers unless some exploit is used that is beyond the scope of the official Sprint "OTA" unlock (which as @KidJoe has advised is only available to actual sprint customers who meet certain criteria).
Man, all these US carrier restrictions on sim locking, bootloaders locked etc....makes me kinda appreciate the Canadian carriers. I've yet to have any issues caused by carriers restricting things on my devices.
KJ said:
Man, all these US carrier restrictions on sim locking, bootloaders locked etc....makes me kinda appreciate the Canadian carriers. I've yet to have any issues caused by carriers restricting things on my devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I've seen. Canadian carriers may give you the unlock code and all and apologize on top as well. Much nice eh?
Well, I had to pay a site to sim unlock....I was not a rogers customer....but at least I could. Unlike sprint. I've never had trouble unlocking bootloaders either.
I'm on T-Mobile, and would prefer to buy it from them because I can just pay it month by month or if I want, more each month. You guys get it.
Anyways, are the phones the exact same on the Google Play store and buying it straight from T-Mobile?
XxKINGxX2580 said:
I'm on T-Mobile, and would prefer to buy it from them because I can just pay it month by month or if I want, more each month. You guys get it.
Anyways, are the phones the exact same on the Google Play store and buying it straight from T-Mobile?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. Everything in the box is identical to the Play Store version except for the manual, which has a T-Mobile logo on it instead of the Nexus logo.
flightsimmer said:
Yep. Everything in the box is identical to the Play Store version except for the manual, which has a T-Mobile logo on it instead of the Nexus logo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its also important to note that all review devices that were sent out were all T-Mobile versions due to the manual, insinuating that Google's main stock is likely indistinguishable from T-Mobile's stock of the N6 in terms of "differences" between. Also the head Product Manager at T-Mobile confirmed that there will be no carrier bloat or tampering with their stock of the N6.
Buying from T-Mobile is the safest carrier when it comes to Nexus devices. They have never tampered with Nexus devices before and its going to be the same for this Nexus.
Dr Faustus said:
Its also important to note that all review devices that were sent out were all T-Mobile versions due to the manual, insinuating that Google's main stock is likely indistinguishable from T-Mobile's stock of the N6 in terms of "differences" between. Also the head Product Manager at T-Mobile confirmed that there will be no carrier bloat or tampering with their stock of the N6.
Buying from T-Mobile is the safest carrier when it comes to Nexus devices. They have never tampered with Nexus devices before and its going to be the same for this Nexus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is great because we potentially walk into store and pick up the N6 earlier than Google play delivery. One thing I worry about is any difference in CID that may delay OTAs? Is it the consensus here that besides that piece of manual, the phones are identical?
mehdi_s82 said:
This is great because we potentially walk into store and pick up the N6 earlier than Google play delivery. One thing I worry about is any difference in CID that may delay OTAs? Is it the consensus here that besides that piece of manual, the phones are identical?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Nexus 5 I got from T-Mobile received the same exact updates and used the same exact software as the Play Store version. The only difference was the T-Mobile logo on the box, and with reviewers receiving a mix of carrier / unlocked devices when it comes to the Nexus 6 it looks like Google is treating them as identical as well.
So, is the N6 that T-Mobile sells unlocked just like the one they sell at the Play Store?
XxKINGxX2580 said:
So, is the N6 that T-Mobile sells unlocked just like the one they sell at the Play Store?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean unlocked as in it can be used on multiple carriers and outside the country? Or unlocked as in the bootloader?
Because if its the former, YES. T-Mobile have sold Nexus devices under the guise of a "World Phone" before, stating that because its not locked by carrier or region it can be used with any Sim in any country depending if the service can support the radios the Nexus has.
If the latter is the question you mean, then technically YES. By default the Nexus devices have a locked bootloader, however its not secure and can be easily unlocked and rooted all the same. T-Mobile does not tamper with locking the bootloader on any of their devices and have not ever done so with the Nexus devices they have sold previously before. This just like previous Nexus hardware will be easy to unlock and root!
Anyone know if t-mobile will sell the white version of the N6?
feedtheducks said:
Anyone know if t-mobile will sell the white version of the N6?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not right now, Only Blue is being sold online and in store at release. Perhaps down the road they might sell the white version but right now they are focused on selling only the Blue.
http://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phones/google-nexus-6.html
Dr Faustus said:
You mean unlocked as in it can be used on multiple carriers and outside the country? Or unlocked as in the bootloader?
Because if its the former, YES. T-Mobile have sold Nexus devices under the guise of a "World Phone" before, stating that because its not locked by carrier or region it can be used with any Sim in any country depending if the service can support the radios the Nexus has.
If the latter is the question you mean, then technically YES. By default the Nexus devices have a locked bootloader, however its not secure and can be easily unlocked and rooted all the same. T-Mobile does not tamper with locking the bootloader on any of their devices and have not ever done so with the Nexus devices they have sold previously before. This just like previous Nexus hardware will be easy to unlock and root!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant unlocked as in carrier unlocked. I know Nexus devices are ridiculously easy to unlock and root.
flightsimmer said:
Yep. Everything in the box is identical to the Play Store version except for the manual, which has a T-Mobile logo on it instead of the Nexus logo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe...maybe not...if everything was identical, really identical, why would this reviewer's retail packaging have "GPE" as in Google Play Edition appended to the end of the model #? Would Motorola really have a separate model # just due to the manual?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go10RfUMSRA&feature=youtu.be&t=6s
(screencap appears 6 seconds in)
People keep getting hardware confused with firmware. The HARDWARE is going to be the same, but until we actually see the phone at T-Mobile, there's no way to know whether it will have the same FIRMWARE. They could quite easily have their own custom firmware (that may be nothing more than added bloat). I'm not saying that this will happen, but it could, and anyone who comes on here and says that it is definitely 100% identical in every way is making an assumption. That assumption may turn out to be true, but at this point, it is still an assumption, not a fact. The same is true for all of the other carriers too. If T-Mobile ends up not having their own firmware, that doesn't absolutely prove that, say, Verizon wont.
Having said that, it's a good sign that some review units seemed to be T-Mobile units, without additional bloat. But keep in mind that often "Review" units are pre-release units, and may not be the same as the final product. So, it still doesn't PROVE that the final T-Mobile units won't have different firmware.
jt3 said:
People keep getting hardware confused with firmware. The HARDWARE is going to be the same, but until we actually see the phone at T-Mobile, there's no way to know whether it will have the same FIRMWARE. They could quite easily have their own custom firmware (that may be nothing more than added bloat). I'm not saying that this will happen, but it could, and anyone who comes on here and says that it is definitely 100% identical in every way is making an assumption. That assumption may turn out to be true, but at this point, it is still an assumption, not a fact. The same is true for all of the other carriers too. If T-Mobile ends up not having their own firmware, that doesn't absolutely prove that, say, Verizon wont.
Having said that, it's a good sign that some review units seemed to be T-Mobile units, without additional bloat. But keep in mind that often "Review" units are pre-release units, and may not be the same as the final product. So, it still doesn't PROVE that the final T-Mobile units won't have different firmware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From the mouth of the head Product Manager at T-Mobile.
Dr Faustus said:
From the mouth of the head Product Manager at T-Mobile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Assuming that ends up being true, and they don't change their mind at the last minute (which would certainly be very unlike T-Mobile), then the OP question seems answered. That doesn't mean anything in regards to the other carriers yet, but the OP didn't ask about them.
Thanks for that, Dr Faustus.
jt3 said:
Assuming that ends up being true, and they don't change their mind at the last minute (which would certainly be very unlike T-Mobile), then the OP question seems answered. That doesn't mean anything in regards to the other carriers yet, but the OP didn't ask about them.
Thanks for that, Dr Faustus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If everything said in this thread is true, and the phone is unlocked, I should be able to walk into a t-mobile on launch day and purchase one to use on Verizon. Correct?
I know that this has been answered several different ways and everyone keeps saying same phone, but just confirming... lol I want to be sure.
Thanks!
amberkalvin said:
If everything said in this thread is true, and the phone is unlocked, I should be able to walk into a t-mobile on launch day and purchase one to use on Verizon. Correct?
I know that this has been answered several different ways and everyone keeps saying same phone, but just confirming... lol I want to be sure.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The reason it's been answered so many different ways is that people are really just guessing, or assuming that the same hardware means it will work. The reality is a bit different though.
If you'd said you wanted to take it to AT&T, I'd say it'd almost certainly work, but Verizon, like other CDMA carriers, has been known in the past to whitelist IMEI numbers, and refuse to activate units not on that list. Units sent to that carrier, units sent out directly from the manufacturer (e.g. warranty replacements), and units sent to contractual partners (like the Play Store) are always added to the whitelist. This is why you can be virtually certain that Play Store units will work on Verizon. (Although, as the 2013 version of the Nexus 7 showed, it may take some time.) However, there is enough history to seriously question whether units sent to other carriers will be allowed.
In truth, we simply don't know, and there's NO WAY to know until someone tries it.
Well, I understand the logic behind that. Wouldn't that mean that since most if not all of the test phones sent out were tmobile phones, the video showing that one working on verizon posted by Droid Life prove that it should work.
http://www.droid-life.com/2014/10/31/nexus-6-working-on-verizon-out-of-the-box/
Time will tell, I understand. I just want one so badly. I've never wanted to pay full retail for a phone so badly only to have it become unavailable immediately upon release.
The phone is unlocked unbranded and no bloat.
Why do people keep asking and debating and questioning?
@askdes has answered all this. If anybody would know, it would be him.
G3
amberkalvin said:
If everything said in this thread is true, and the phone is unlocked, I should be able to walk into a t-mobile on launch day and purchase one to use on Verizon. Correct?
I know that this has been answered several different ways and everyone keeps saying same phone, but just confirming... lol I want to be sure.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes....and no.
It would work the same regardless of US Carrier as long as you have a working sim for that carrier to use in the N6.
BUT. And this is a pretty big BUT, T-Mobile stores have confirmed that they will NOT be selling the N6 straight out without contract. They will only sell the device with the intent of selling a plan/upgrade of current customers. Not an off contract purchase.
Dr Faustus said:
You mean unlocked as in it can be used on multiple carriers and outside the country? Or unlocked as in the bootloader?
Because if its the former, YES. T-Mobile have sold Nexus devices under the guise of a "World Phone" before, stating that because its not locked by carrier or region it can be used with any Sim in any country depending if the service can support the radios the Nexus has.
If the latter is the question you mean, then technically YES. By default the Nexus devices have a locked bootloader, however its not secure and can be easily unlocked and rooted all the same. T-Mobile does not tamper with locking the bootloader on any of their devices and have not ever done so with the Nexus devices they have sold previously before. This just like previous Nexus hardware will be easy to unlock and root!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Small correction. T-Mo will lock bootloaders of Sony devices only.
So, BF came and I shot me a verizon unlocked xt1096 somewhat foolishly expecting that unlocked means fully unlocked.....means I can do with it what I want.
Not getting gang raped like the Apple crowd.
But it seems like I was wrong. After some days of just playing around with the new phone and still using my Note2 (rooted) I went ahead and made the full switch........
and got kicked in the balls when I realized that some of my beloved progs won't work because, the thing has a locked bootloader (wtf??) and can't be rooted (another wtf).
Now, I really wonder why this is, since I paid for the phone in full that I can not do with it what I want.
Maybe I am stupid (easily possible) but I don't get this. Can someone please explain why this is that way?
Thanks
K
probably stupid.
Verizon sells SIM unlocked devices. What you want is bootloader unlocked which is only possible on the pure edition devices which only work on At&t or T-Mobile in the states.
Caveat emptor.
Unlocked sim is not the same as unlocked bootloader........ two very different things
You have a logic error there. I bought it from Motorola NOT Verizon. So why does Verzion have control over a piece of equipment I bought from somewhere else?
Just because they "allow" me to pay them for their services?
TigerDNA said:
Unlocked sim is not the same as unlocked bootloader........ two very different things
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, just follow my way of thought please. I buy from Motorola. Full price. And still Verizon has me by the balls? Please explain why.
hungarian said:
..... still Verizon has me by the balls.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That pretty much sums it up.
mbkintner said:
That pretty much sums it up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am growing pretty tired about that kind of BS in this country. Maybe I was to cradled by consumer protection laws in Europe, but I seriously doubt that kind of BS would fly in Europe.
I had a oneplus one and sold it because Tmobile didnt cover me....... I was with Verizon for 4 years under contract. SO I thought this way I get a better deal......
I really don't understand why Motorola plays that kind of ****.
hungarian said:
I am growing pretty tired about that kind of BS in this country. Maybe I was to cradled by consumer protection laws in Europe, but I seriously doubt that kind of BS would fly in Europe.
I had a oneplus one and sold it because Tmobile didnt cover me....... I was with Verizon for 4 years under contract. SO I thought this way I get a better deal......
I really don't understand why Motorola plays that kind of ****.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you were coddled by EU laws, welcome to freedom bro. The ONLY way to get a better deal with Verizon is to never have any form of contact with them, don't even make eye contact with the stores when you pass. :good:
You entered into a voluntary contract and should have read the conditions before signing.
You know, if my clients would be ok with smoke signals and emails, I would....but damn...sometimes those bad people want to talk to me.....
chrisrozon said:
You entered into a voluntary contract and should have read the conditions before signing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean? I should have asked Motorola if they lock the bootloader in the name of the all so mighty overlord Verizon?
Sorry, but I think if I buy a factory unlocked phone, I should receive a unlocked phone. A phine that is free of the antics and bs of Verizon.
Thats why I opted out of my contract and went with a prepaid solution. Where I bring my own phone.
What nerves me most here, is that everyone takes the dry as* screwing like it is normal that you get drilled up the backside high and dry.
Where is the outcry? Is really everyone so commercially ironed out and conformed that we can be handled like money suppliers that bring their cash anyway?
Please don't answer, I really fear to hear many "yes" or even worse, if you don't like it go back to Europe.
I don't see what the problem is. Your money speaks your opinion. Cancel your service with verizon and switch to T-Mobile or at&t where you can use a PE. Or buy a nexus 6 (which can be unlocked on Verizon). The web has a vast amount of info on any phone you ever plan on buying.
you are overseeing one crucial point. I bought the phone from Motorola. NOT from Verizon. I bought it outside of a contract. I bought it unlocked.
And still Verizon has power over a phone they shouldn't have.
The problem with other providers around here is, that they don't have coverage......
hungarian said:
you are overseeing one crucial point. I bought the phone from Motorola. NOT from Verizon. I bought it outside of a contract. I bought it unlocked.
And still Verizon has power over a phone they shouldn't have.
The problem with other providers around here is, that they don't have coverage......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You still bought a Verizon branded phone. Verizon doesn't care about whether or not you are on contract, what they care about is that you are on their network. They want to have full control of every device that's on their network, plain and simple. I understand your frustration but it's not like a precedent is being set here- this is how it's always been. Not trying to drive salt in the wound here but had you done your due diligence and researched prior to purchase, you could have avoided this little surprise. As I said, this is nothing new, unfortunately.
Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
hungarian said:
you are overseeing one crucial point. I bought the phone from Motorola. NOT from Verizon. I bought it outside of a contract. I bought it unlocked.
And still Verizon has power over a phone they shouldn't have.
The problem with other providers around here is, that they don't have coverage......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you buy a Verizon-branded phone from Best Buy do you still wonder why Verizon's software is on it? You didn't buy it from Verizon, you bought it from Best Buy!
Deleted
hungarian said:
What do you mean? I should have asked Motorola if they lock the bootloader in the name of the all so mighty overlord Verizon?
Sorry, but I think if I buy a factory unlocked phone, I should receive a unlocked phone. A phine that is free of the antics and bs of Verizon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know, it is impossible to buy any variant of the Moto X 2014 that comes with an unlocked bootloader. Secondly, Motorola only marketed the Pure Edition Moto X (GSM) as being bloat-free. Motorola (or any other manufacturer for that matter) will never sell a CDMA phone that is not carrier-branded as all of the major CDMA carriers will only activate their own carrier-branded phones.
sorry but your statement is void. I bought from the maker. Not a reseller.
Hello. Is there already the possibility to root the S10 with Magisk or the like? Thank you
No
Why don't you read over the headlines of many other posts like this...there's also a huge threat about root
Jannomag said:
Why don't you read over the headlines of many other posts like this...there's also a huge threat about root
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A THREAT? That was a funny typo. Yes, looks like TWRP & root are getting closer.
https://www.xda-developers.com/exynos-samsung-galaxy-s10-rooted-magisk/
---------- Post added at 09:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 PM ----------
Haven't been in the Samsung community for very long. But curious why is the exy allowed root but the snapdragon not?
Thanks
sruel3216 said:
https://www.xda-developers.com/exynos-samsung-galaxy-s10-rooted-magisk/
---------- Post added at 09:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 PM ----------
Haven't been in the Samsung community for very long. But curious why is the exy allowed root but the snapdragon not?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because in USA, there's a "free market" - carriers decide what phone you have. Carriers decide how many SIM cards you have. Carriers decide if you will root or not. It's that simple.:good:
doggydog2 said:
because in USA, there's a "free market" - carriers decide what phone you have. Carriers decide how many SIM cards you have. Carriers decide if you will root or not. It's that simple.:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But if you buy unlocked from Samsung why can't you root? I would understand if you buy a carrier version.
I have a 6t on Verizon and can obviously root.
sruel3216 said:
But if you buy unlocked from Samsung why can't you root? I would understand if you buy a carrier version.
I have a 6t on Verizon and can obviously root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because the cartel is asking major manufacturers to bring such devices that will lock their customers in. In Asia, dual sim is the rule. In Europe, cartel was defeated on this matter as we finally getting dual SIM Samsung devices. But in USA, oops, you need the cartel to decide for you. Introducing 6T by TMobile was considered as "unthinkable" event by Forbes as they are so root friendly.. lol, you have to laugh. The market there is to lock the devices to single carrier (shady practice abandoned in Europe since 90s and is unlawful). They bloat the phones. They dictate single SIM models - hence you have always Samsungs model types dedicated to the US market (see gsmarena.com or phonedb.net for the respective codes). When someone throws an offer to eBay to sell phone, they better unlock it first (the practice not needed anywhere else). But won't get root on it (the practice only in USA). And you label your offer "Verizon Samsung XXX Unlocked" - like that phone is unlocked and still nead to bear the name of carrier? Probably some logos on it or unremovable software? Free market!
To summarize:
-carrier blocking: standard in USA, unlawful in Europe, rare in other countries
-root blocking: common in USA provided by some big manufacturers and now despotic Huawei
-forcing single sim models: standard in USA by giving offers to big manufacturers they can't refuse, laughably impossible in Asia (well, maybe iPhone), still common in Europe
-bloating and creating carrier-specific models: standard in USA, rare in other countries (and if they're, like Korea, HongKong, they are only enhanced!)
-putting physical carrier logos on hardware: standard in USA, not sure about other countries
Deleted, wrong thread.
Tel864 said:
Because that unlocked phone will most likely be used for a US carrier, so they're locked down just as tight.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm wonder how OnePlus got around it. My 6t is on Verizon
---------- Post added at 11:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:50 PM ----------
doggydog2 said:
because the cartel is asking major manufacturers to bring such devices that will lock their customers in. In Asia, dual sim is the rule. In Europe, cartel was defeated on this matter as we finally getting dual SIM Samsung devices. But in USA, oops, you need the cartel to decide for you. Introducing 6T by TMobile was considered as "unthinkable" event by Forbes as they are so root friendly.. lol, you have to laugh. The market there is to lock the devices to single carrier (shady practice abandoned in Europe since 90s and is unlawful). They bloat the phones. They dictate single SIM models - hence you have always Samsungs model types dedicated to the US market (see gsmarena.com or phonedb.net for the respective codes). When someone throws an offer to eBay to sell phone, they better unlock it first (the practice not needed anywhere else). But won't get root on it (the practice only in USA). And you label your offer "Verizon Samsung XXX Unlocked" - like that phone is unlocked and still nead to bear the name of carrier? Probably some logos on it or unremovable software? Free market!
To summarize:
-carrier blocking: standard in USA, unlawful in Europe, rare in other countries
-root blocking: common in USA provided by some big manufacturers and now despotic Huawei
-forcing single sim models: standard in USA by giving offers to big manufacturers they can't refuse, laughably impossible in Asia (well, maybe iPhone), still common in Europe
-bloating and creating carrier-specific models: standard in USA, rare in other countries (and if they're, like Korea, HongKong, they are only enhanced!)
-putting physical carrier logos on hardware: standard in USA, not sure about other countries
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info. I don't really need root these days but I like it which is why I have a 6t on Verizon. I'll be fine with out it once my S10 arrives, but would be nice.
So Samsung basically has a deal with all the US carriers to not allow unlocking, even if you by from samsung.com?
sruel3216 said:
Hmm wonder how OnePlus got around it. My 6t is on Verizon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's because it's Samsung, they seem to be the fair-haired child of phone companies. I used to do some Motorola development and I guess they are all unlockable still. You could take any Moto and do anything with it, but you never see those given away like Samsung and sometimes IPhone by the phone companies.
Tel864 said:
It's because it's Samsung, they seem to be the fair-haired child of phone companies. I used to do some Motorola development and I guess they are all unlockable still. You could take any Moto and do anything with it, but you never see those given away like Samsung and sometimes IPhone by the phone companies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This poster is correct Oneplus has a completely different ethos as a company they are more interested in their user base, whereas samsung are more interested in the carriers and the corporate base as such knox and locked bootloaders make their devices much more attractive to enterprise level corporation who are big in MDM and so on. Oneplus are just not going for that market as yet.
curioct said:
This poster is correct Oneplus has a completely different ethos as a company they are more interested in their user base, whereas samsung are more interested in the carriers and the corporate base as such knox and locked bootloaders make their devices much more attractive to enterprise level corporation who are big in MDM and so on. Oneplus are just not going for that market as yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OnePlus will eventually get there if they grow big enough to where they sell phones in ATT and Verizon stores.
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
daniel4653 said:
OnePlus will eventually get there if they grow big enough to where they sell phones in ATT and Verizon stores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe but for me it isn't so much about the retail to consumers for me or the carriers per se, it is more about convincing enterprise customers your product is right for them.
Their price point to feature set combo might be compelling to businesses but the security provided by locked bootloaders and the knox platform makes samsung very very compelling in that market.
It will be interesting to see how their growth occurs. I very nearly went for the 6T this time personally but I don't accept a phone from my business and use my own because I don't want their MDM / security or to carry two devices so I stay BYOD.
curioct said:
This poster is correct Oneplus has a completely different ethos as a company they are more interested in their user base, whereas samsung are more interested in the carriers and the corporate base as such knox and locked bootloaders make their devices much more attractive to enterprise level corporation who are big in MDM and so on. Oneplus are just not going for that market as yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see. I'll prob just keep my 6t and the S10 then. If I get the root itch I can get my fix still lol