Related
Extremely sorry if I am spamming the forum with this thread, but thought of starting this discussion to see if the geeks can help with sharing the knowledge.
I don't think I have to emphasize on why Magisk over Xposed (The Magisk Forum has a lot of articles on why.), but I am surprised to realize that Magisk is still the so called "new guy" even after these many years of launch..
All I get for a sample search "best modules Magisk" is a bunch of tweaking modules which say they can alter your ART mechanism or save your battery, I mean, who cares for the performance in 2019!!! we have got beastly phones and just want magik to happen on them. Magisk is still the same serious experimental mod that lets you root and hide it from banking/work apps but not yet cool.
For example, every time I installed Xposed on a new phone, I would go look for the famous "Gravity Box" just to enable the status bar brightness control gesture.
And the "X-insta" that lets me download media from Instagram . (Of course this module seems to be dead for a few months).
And a bunch of adblockers.
And a hell lot mods that I don't remember from the top of my head, but it was really magic.. And it is slowing down (I feel so..)
Well, someone might say that we can install Xposed itself as a module, but that just crashes the "SafetyNet" which is very annoying, it makes the phone useless without being able to open GooglePay and other banking apps.
I know I might be wrong but I am posting just to see if people use any equivalent "cool" modules in Magisk that are not easily seen in the Magisk Modules repo or if someone has found a way to pass the "SafetyNet" with Xposed+Magisk to make Android awesome again!!:good:
sagar2208 said:
Extremely sorry if I am spamming the forum with this thread, but thought of starting this discussion to see if the geeks can help with sharing the knowledge.
I don't think I have to emphasize on why Magisk over Xposed (The Magisk Forum has a lot of articles on why.), but I am surprised to realize that Magisk is still the so called "new guy" even after these many years of launch..
All I get for a sample search "best modules Magisk" is a bunch of tweaking modules which say they can alter your ART mechanism or save your battery, I mean, who cares for the performance in 2019!!! we have got beastly phones and just want magik to happen on them. Magisk is still the same serious experimental mod that lets you root and hide it from banking/work apps but not yet cool.
For example, every time I installed Xposed on a new phone, I would go look for the famous "Gravity Box" just to enable the status bar brightness control gesture.
And the "X-insta" that lets me download media from Instagram . (Of course this module seems to be dead for a few months).
And a bunch of adblockers.
And a hell lot mods that I don't remember from the top of my head, but it was really magic.. And it is slowing down (I feel so..)
Well, someone might say that we can install Xposed itself as a module, but that just crashes the "SafetyNet" which is very annoying, it makes the phone useless without being able to open GooglePay and other banking apps.
I know I might be wrong but I am posting just to see if people use any equivalent "cool" modules in Magisk that are not easily seen in the Magisk Modules repo or if someone has found a way to pass the "SafetyNet" with Xposed+Magisk to make Android awesome again!!:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Magisk doesn't work the same way as Xposed,one mounts and modifies files and the other hooks and modifies app code at runtime,and yes there is a way to use Xposed and pass safetynet if you are either on Oreo or Pie,it's called Edxposed
Edxposed is an open source Xposed alternative released early this year that uses a different method to hook into the system which allows it to pass safetynet and it allows you to blacklist apps in which you don't to load Xposed into,and if you are in pie there is already a beta of gravitybox that fully supports Pie (it's not yet in the Xposed repo because it's not fully stable yet)
Here are some pictures showing edxposed passing safetynet and me using the event lock module on Android pie,incase you are interested here are the links to edxposed https://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/android-9-0-xposed-solutions-t3889513 it works on both Oreo and Pie (ignore the last step and just use edxposed installer) it's the last link and the first post,if you have any doubts feel free to ask there
DanGLES3 said:
Here are some pictures showing edxposed passing safetynet and me using the event lock module on Android pie,incase you are interested here are the links to edxposed https://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/android-9-0-xposed-solutions-t3889513 it works on both Oreo and Pie (ignore the last step and just use edxposed installer) it's the last link and the first post,if you have any doubts feel free to ask there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A Hope!!
Thank you very much for the info, will try and post an update..
Even after these many years of launch people seems to not understand Magisk purpose, features and way of work. Same for Xposed.
Does Magisk has "modules" ? Yes! Does Xposed has "modules" ? Yes! But that's it. The name. The only thing in common between Magisk and Xposed is _the name, the word, "module" _ for their respective plug-ins, addons. Nothing more. Period.
Magisk attachs to Android, works completely different from the way Xposed does. What they do and what they can do are different. They are not even closer to be an alternative of one to another.
Having that said, do not expect that modules of one can deliver similar features of a module of another. If this somehow someday for an specific pair of modules happen be sure they are accomplishing that but doing in complete different ways behind the scenes.
About Xposed not breaking SafetyNet, we have now for Android O+ the alternatives EdXposed (open source) and Tai Chi (closed source). They do not break it because the way they're implemented is different from original Xposed by Rovo. They are different approachs, new code with new ways of work, but that delivers same entrance points, same nomenclature, as original Xposed itself. Thus being (generally speaking) compatible with modules originally built to original Xposed.
Both EdXposed and Tai Chi are experimental yet, although working fine at least on Android P. If they show themselves as solid solutions then probably we will see new Xposed like modules appearing out there. I do hope so.
wilsonhlacerda said:
Even after these many years of launch people seems to not understand Magisk purpose, features and way of work. Same for Xposed.
Does Magisk has "modules" ? Yes! Does Xposed has "modules" ? Yes! But that's it. The name. The only thing in common between Magisk and Xposed is _the name, the word, "module" _ for their respective plug-ins, addons. Nothing more. Period.
Magisk attachs to Android, works completely different from the way Xposed does. What they do and what they can do are different. They are not even closer to be an alternative of one to another.
Having that said, do not expect that modules of one can deliver similar features of a module of another. If this somehow someday for an specific pair of modules happen be sure they are accomplishing that but doing in complete different ways behind the scenes.
About Xposed not breaking SafetyNet, we have now for Android O+ the alternatives EdXposed (open source) and Tai Chi (closed source). They do not break it because the way they're implemented is different from original Xposed by Rovo. They are different approachs, new code with new ways of work, but that delivers same entrance points, same nomenclature, as original Xposed itself. Thus being (generally speaking) compatible with modules originally built to original Xposed.
Both EdXposed and Tai Chi are experimental yet, although working fine at least on Android P. If they show themselves as solid solutions then probably we will see new Xposed like modules appearing out there. I do hope so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't have said it better (my previous texts were written at 3am so pardon for any mistake I did XD)
Hey all,
Just wanted to share a simple Magisk Module that tweaks the Ambient EQ on our phones to behave more like Apple's True Tone feature. This idea and module was originally created by @MishaalRahman and published here. As you can see the article was published in November 2019, and the structure of Magisk Modules has since changed. So, the module that you can download from that article no longer works. I've simply updated the module to be compatible with the new Magisk Module file structure and function correctly on our phones.
Instructions and Notes:
Note: This module was originally created for the Pixel 4 (Flame). Due to the Pixel 4 XL (Coral) using a different panel, this module may have unintended effects on screen color and gamma that I have not been able to test. Give it a shot if you'd like, but YMMV.
Install via Magisk Manager or flash the .zip using your favorite Kernel Manager and reboot.
The module has been submitted to the Magisk Module Repo, where it will be able to be downloaded directly from the Magisk Manager app, but it is awaiting approval.
Download (AFH)
Original Author: @MishaalRahman
Original Module and Associated Documentation: https://www.xda-developers.com/google-pixel-4-ambient-eq-tweak/
Source: https://github.com/Alcolawl/AmbientEQTweak
Thanks! I really appreciate it.
Like two months without the module working and you fixed it.
After normal installation, the performance of some apps is significantly reduced.
gyuuuu said:
After normal installation, the performance of some apps is significantly reduced.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't noticed it
Alcolawl said:
Hey all,
Just wanted to share a simple Magisk Module that tweaks the Ambient EQ on our phones to behave more like Apple's True Tone feature. This idea and module was originally created by @MishaalRahman and published here. As you can see the article was published in November 2019, and the structure of Magisk Modules has since changed. So, the module that you can download from that article no longer works. I've simply updated the module to be compatible with the new Magisk Module file structure and function correctly on our phones.
Instructions and Notes:
Note: This module was originally created for the Pixel 4 (Flame). Due to the Pixel 4 XL (Coral) using a different panel, this module may have unintended effects on screen color and gamma that I have not been able to test. Give it a shot if you'd like, but YMMV.
Install via Magisk Manager or flash the .zip using your favorite Kernel Manager and reboot.
The module has been submitted to the Magisk Module Repo, where it will be able to be downloaded directly from the Magisk Manager app, but it is awaiting approval.
Download (AFH)
Original AuthorMishaalRahman
Original Module and Associated Documentation:https://www.xda-developers.com/google-pixel-4-ambient-eq-tweak/
Source:https://github.com/Alcolawl/AmbientEQTweak
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Somehow after enabling this module on Android 11 beta 2.5 phone goes crazy.
I get delayed sms, delayed emails, app in the play store don't download and weather doesn't show.
Disabling an restarting fixed it , enable, restart, problem comes again
peikojose said:
Somehow after enabling this module on Android 11 beta 2.5 phone goes crazy.
I get delayed sms, delayed emails, app in the play store don't download and weather doesn't show.
Disabling an restarting fixed it , enable, restart, problem comes again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wild stuff. I'd assume it's because you're using Android 11 beta. The way this works is basically an overlay for System UI, which I'm assuming has seen at least some moderate changes from Android 10 to Android 11. I'm not entirely sure why it would break things like SMS, but I would definitely assume that this isn't compatible with Android 11. This will be something I'll have to work on when Android 11 officially drops.
Alcolawl said:
Wild stuff. I'd assume it's because you're using Android 11 beta. The way this works is basically an overlay for System UI, which I'm assuming has seen at least some moderate changes from Android 10 to Android 11. I'm not entirely sure why it would break things like SMS, but I would definitely assume that this isn't compatible with Android 11. This will be something I'll have to work on when Android 11 officially drops.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah it doesn't make any sense but at least with this beta it does that.. and it is totally easy to reproduce for me...
Any update to make it work properly with Android 11? Just asking.
Thanks!
peikojose said:
Any update to make it work properly with Android 11? Just asking.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately I may just abandon this idea. It turns out that this module was actually responsible for the frustratingly horrible performance I was experiencing when using Snapchat. Like the phone totally locking up for 5-10 seconds sometimes for seemingly no reason. I know Snapchat is a massive piece of ****, but unfortunately, my tries to convince several groups of friends to move to a different app have been unsuccessful. After removing this module, performance was restored. Because of this, along with other reports of sluggish performance when using this module, I'll most likely discontinue working on this for Android 11.
Alcolawl said:
Unfortunately I may just abandon this idea. It turns out that this module was actually responsible for the frustratingly horrible performance I was experiencing when using Snapchat. Like the phone totally locking up for 5-10 seconds sometimes for seemingly no reason. I know Snapchat is a massive piece of ****, but unfortunately, my tries to convince several groups of friends to move to a different app have been unsuccessful. After removing this module, performance was restored. Because of this, along with other reports of sluggish performance when using this module, I'll most likely discontinue working on this for Android 11.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I was one of the ones that reported problems even with sms after using this module.
So sad! Thanks anyway
Hi
I have a primary phone (Xiaomi mi 8) running Android 10. I also have an SM-A710M galaxy (I know this not popular at all) running LineageOS
Both these phones are rooted with magisk and I tried to install the xposed framework on the Samsung using this tutorial : https://forum.xda-developers.com/xpo...posed-t3388268
In this thread, it is said that the framework works on all Android versions and that if a device supports Magisk rooting, then Xposed is also supported
Well actually that is not true as it turns out xposed is not supported on my two different phones.
Is this a bug ? Is it just because Xposed is not THE APP IT USED TO BE ? Or are my phones really not compatible ?
Sorry for my english
Thanks for any help
Just ordered a Galaxy A71; anyone have any idea whether I'd be able to install Xposed and GravityBox?
Kimmoth said:
Just ordered a Galaxy A71; anyone have any idea whether I'd be able to install Xposed and GravityBox?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You will be able to install edxposed with magisk but not gravity box.
Gravity box is made for AOSP ROM, almost all features of gravity box will not work on One UI of Samsung.
Fishcat7 said:
You will be able to install edxposed with magisk but not gravity box.
Gravity box is made for AOSP ROM, almost all features of gravity box will not work on One UI of Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I was afraid of that... but isn't more like, the more a vendor modifies AOSP, the more tweaks are broken?
The big one for me, a reason just by itself to install GravityBox, is to enable the volume buttons to move the caret in a text field. Second-biggest reason is to allow customisation of all buttons for double-tap and long-press functions. Third, more control over DPI setting (I like to make stuff as small as I can see, to use desktop mode in my browser; standard control doesn't let me go far enough). The other tweaks I make with GravityBox, I could live without.
So technically speaking, these are very small reasons to bother with Xposed and GravityBox, but the useability gains make it worth the hassle. I don't suppose I could find these modifications as individual tweaks for the A71's stock firmware, somehow?
Kimmoth said:
Third, more control over DPI setting (I like to make stuff as small as I can see, to use desktop mode in my browser; standard control doesn't let me go far enough).
So technically speaking, these are very small reasons to bother with Xposed and GravityBox
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Two things. The first one is that if you want to have full control over DPI I advise you to use the root essentials app : https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.superthomaslab.rootessentials
Using edXposed is a great solution but (if I am not mistaken, I think you rooted with Magisk no? Just keep in mind that if you install edXposed, you will loose one the most important magisk feature : pass Safety Net check
cl.ement05 said:
Two things. The first one is that if you want to have full control over DPI I advise you to use the root essentials app : https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.superthomaslab.rootessentials
Using edXposed is a great solution but (if I am not mistaken, I think you rooted with Magisk no? Just keep in mind that if you install edXposed, you will loose one the most important magisk feature : pass Safety Net check
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't got the phone yet... every damn time I get a phone, it's like I have to go back to square one learning how to root; it's like fortnight of eye-glazing research to make it happen. Googling Safety Net this time around, things look grim.
For the first time, I'm wondering if it's a better idea to not mess with my phone, which pisses me off hard.
H! So I am actually unsure where to post this..
Here's hoping you can figure something out and not be mad at me if this is the wrong place to post this.
Initially, i was going to post this as a Bug report on Github. However, I figured this was not correct.
Technically speaking this also isn't really an issue with magisk itself, more that adobe might have found a way to circumvent magisk anti detection methods.
In short: The App "Adobe Account Access" (com.adobe.ims.accountaccess on the play store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.adobe.ims.accountaccess) seems to have found a way to detect magisk and/or root, even though root detection is hidden in magisk.
The App just displays a prompt, saying "Device not supported. Sorry, your phone is not supported for Adobe Account Access.", even though the device used should be supported.
I checked with adobe community support on whether my Phone is supported or not and according to them, it should indeed be supported: https://community.adobe.com/t5/acco...-access-app-device-not-supported/m-p/11696613
I suspect they have found a way to get around all magisk anti detection methods and i would be grateful if someone would be kind enough to check if there is a workaround or if magisk's detection prevention needs an update.
Unfortunately, i don't have much more to say other than that..
There aren't any magisk log entries that would indicate something went wrong (only entries mentioning the app are"i" loglevel, one coming from hide_list_add and one coming from proc_monitor).
I could not find anything out of the ordinary in the logcat, although i suppose i could be more thorough with my search.
My technical/general info would be:
Magisk Version used: 22.0 (22000) (18)
SafetyNet integrity: Both basicIntegrity AND ctsProfile = pass; evalType = BASIC
ROM used: OxygenOS 10.0.11.GM21BA
Android version: 10
Device name: OnePlus 7 Pro
"Adobe Account Access" App version: 1.6
+++ Please feel free to ask for any additional info in case I missed it +++
Thanks in advance for any productive suggestion!
When does it display this "device not supported" message? I tested just now and could log in and set everything up without even adding the app to the Hide list, and with the Magisk app unhidden.
Didgeridoohan said:
When does it display this "device not supported" message? I tested just now and could log in and set everything up without even adding the app to the Hide list.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh? That is peculiar.. Damn, that implies an issue somewhere else i reckon ://
It displays it immediately after launching the app. The very first screen..
What phone and which OS (/ROM) are you using? Might just be that my phone is genuinely not supported and the folks over at the adobe community forum lied when saying my phone should be compatible..
Also, which android version are you on if you don't mind me asking?
You don't have any modules installed? No edxposed or lsposed, or magisk modules?
Have you tried root detection apps like Root Beer Fresh to see if indeed the app is unable to detect root? If you try any such app, remember to add it to the Magisk Hide list beforehand, otherwise the app will clearly detect root.
It's a OnePlus 3T with Android 9 ArrowOS. As stated above, it could very well be a module, like EdXposed. Or a root app, or a file or folder on your device, or something completely different.
It's not detecting Magisk at least, that's for sure...
General root hiding tips:
https://www.didgeridoohan.com/magisk/MagiskHide#hn_Hiding_root_from_apps
@Barrel Titor
Samsung Galaxy S7 Custom 9.0 Pie, Magisk 22 root with random name, application without hiding works fine.
Hi all!
First of all: Apologies! I meant to respond sooner to this, but work has kept me occupied and the one time I actually was available, XDA Forums went down into maintenance mode..
Secondly: Sorry for maybe jumping the gun here a bit!
It does look like I should have tested this issue a bit more! I am definitely going to keep on trying to fix this on my own using the resources and methods you have suggested!
I have tested com.adobe.ims.accountaccess on my sisters unrooted OnePlus Nord.. It works fine there, which is really confusing. None of the other apps I am using show this sort of issue :c Not even my banking app!
@mario0318 Thanks for your suggestion! I know it is good practice to remove/disable all your modules. However, none of the modules I have currently installed are particularly large and they certainly do not modify much compared to what is possible. I am going to attach a list to this response, however I am also going to try disabling them one by one and see if I can find the culprit! Unfortunately, I will not be able to disable the "Google Dialer Framework" module, since it causes the device to bootloop if the google dialer app is still present.
Here is a list of all the modules I have installed and enabled at the moment:
Spoiler
App Systemizer (Terminal Emulator)
Busybox for Android NDK
Google Dialer Framework
Looki75 Product Sans font
Systemless Hosts
ViPER4ANDROID FX
Honourable mentions (these modules are completely DISABLED):
Spoiler
Riru
Riru - EdXposed
However, please note again that SafetyNet seems to be INTACT, with "basicIntegrity" and "ctsProfile" still passing and "evalType" being "BASIC".
In any case. Thanks to everyone for their contribution! I really appreciate any suggestion!
Edit: @mario0318 right after I posted this message, I went ahead and gave "RootbeerFresh" a shot. It does not detect root when it is hidden from it. This makes my leading theory to be that the app truly does not support OnePlus 7 Pro devices. Wouldn't know why it doesn't support this model in particular though. Until I either unroot or find someone with the same device, willing to install Adobe Account Access, i can't say for sure though.
Barrel Titor said:
Hi all!
First of all: Apologies! I meant to respond sooner to this, but work has kept me occupied and the one time I actually was available, XDA Forums went down into maintenance mode..
Secondly: Sorry for maybe jumping the gun here a bit!
It does look like I should have tested this issue a bit more! I am definitely going to keep on trying to fix this on my own using the resources and methods you have suggested!
I have tested com.adobe.ims.accountaccess on my sisters unrooted OnePlus Nord.. It works fine there, which is really confusing. None of the other apps I am using show this sort of issue :c Not even my banking app!
@mario0318 Thanks for your suggestion! I know it is good practice to remove/disable all your modules. However, none of the modules I have currently installed are particularly large and they certainly do not modify much compared to what is possible. I am going to attach a list to this response, however I am also going to try disabling them one by one and see if I can find the culprit! Unfortunately, I will not be able to disable the "Google Dialer Framework" module, since it causes the device to bootloop if the google dialer app is still present.
Here is a list of all the modules I have installed and enabled at the moment:
Spoiler
App Systemizer (Terminal Emulator)
Busybox for Android NDK
Google Dialer Framework
Looki75 Product Sans font
Systemless Hosts
ViPER4ANDROID FX
Honourable mentions (these modules are completely DISABLED):
Spoiler
Riru
Riru - EdXposed
However, please note again that SafetyNet seems to be INTACT, with "basicIntegrity" and "ctsProfile" still passing and "evalType" being "BASIC".
In any case. Thanks to everyone for their contribution! I really appreciate any suggestion!
Edit: @mario0318 right after I posted this message, I went ahead and gave "RootbeerFresh" a shot. It does not detect root when it is hidden from it. This makes my leading theory to be that the app truly does not support OnePlus 7 Pro devices. Wouldn't know why it doesn't support this model in particular though. Until I either unroot or find someone with the same device, willing to install Adobe Account Access, i can't say for sure though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So upon Google searching "oneplus 7 pro adobe account access" it appears to be a common problem.
mario0318 said:
So upon Google searching "oneplus 7 pro adobe account access" it appears to be a common problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cannot find any results using this search term on google other than my own post on the adobe community forums.. This one: https://community.adobe.com/t5/acco...access-app-device-not-supported/td-p/11695914
@mario0318 do you happen to know a way to somehow "pretend" to the app that i am in fact using a different phone? Something that would allow me to make the app believe it is running on a different device?
Barrel Titor said:
@mario0318 do you happen to know a way to somehow "pretend" to the app that i am in fact using a different phone? Something that would allow me to make the app believe it is running on a different device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, the well known magisk module MHPC or Magisk Hide Props Config comes to mind. You can change device fingerprints and maybe also give the Device Simulation feature a go, or custom edit any range of configurable props.
You could do so without the module editing the build.props yourself. Or if you stick with edxposed and deal with not having magisk manager's hide enabled, perhaps any of the device spoofers on the xposed repo could fool the app. Or Sudohide if you set Adobe app to hide from any and all apps that are root relevant. May also consider removing directories in your internal and removable storage for things like TWRP or PBRP, Titanium Backup, xposes, etc, you know, things that a simple media scan looking for any sign of root apps might pick up.
But for now, I'd give MHPC a try and change device fingerprint and maybe enable device simulation if simple fingerprint change doesn't work.
I'm having the same issue on a rooted OnePlus 8T
Same for me on op7 pro. Hiding with somiko but Adobe still not working. Nor could I bypass square, it notes root when it pairs Bluetooth
I'm not clear on the differences between them, and it seems that there are even more alternatives.
Is one better than another?
I just got an Android 10 phone, was previously on 7 for a short time, but was otherwise still on 5 and 6.
AllanonMage said:
I'm not clear on the differences between them, and it seems that there are even more alternatives.
Is one better than another?
I just got an Android 10 phone, was previously on 7 for a short time, but was otherwise still on 5 and 6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The main difference is that in LSPosed you have to whitelist apps to be hooked instead of blacklist. The second one is that EdXposed seems to break SafetyNet in latest version. And it seems that it's not that actively developed as LSPosed
They both have whitelist and on LSPosed it set in default. But only EdXposed have blacklist. I saw some comment like "have too much modules and too much apps to hook, how painful to check everything by manually".
Yes, Edxposed still break SafetyNet.
Yes, now Edxposed is not that actively update than LSPosed.
Something about LSPosed
If you can read Chinese, maybe you can read these below: https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv9603603/ https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv9603669/ https://www.zhihu.com/question/442534533 https://www.zhihu.com/question/442531709 I am very troubled by...
forum.xda-developers.com
I personally tried both. Not that much difference. Yeah, because basically LSPosed just forked Edxposed and did a little improvement.
In the end I choose Edxposed rather than LSPosed. Because I can't trust one dev who made a prank about "rm -rf" and the rest dev have no objection to this and even help him to hide it. And those personal attack with filthy language of course.
Arakawa. said:
They both have whitelist and on LSPosed it set in default. But only EdXposed have blacklist. I saw some comment like "have too much modules and too much apps to hook, how painful to check everything by manually".
Yes, Edxposed still break SafetyNet.
Yes, now Edxposed is not that actively update than LSPosed.
Something about LSPosed
If you can read Chinese, maybe you can read these below: https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv9603603/ https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv9603669/ https://www.zhihu.com/question/442534533 https://www.zhihu.com/question/442531709 I am very troubled by...
forum.xda-developers.com
I personally tried both. Not that much difference. Yeah, because basically LSPosed just forked Edxposed and did a little improvement.
In the end I choose Edxposed rather than LSPosed. Because I can't trust one dev who made a prank about "rm -rf" and the rest dev have no objection to this and even help him to hide it. And those personal attack with filthy language of course.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The developer you mentioned has left the development group long ago
All I wanna know is which one passes safetytest. Installed edxposed for the first time in 2 years only to discover that safetytest is completely fubar'd. And all the tutorials I've found are old and seemingly obsolete.
This moment, LSPosed is alot better than EdXposed.
Simple that.
I say many thanks to EdXposed, but LSPosed is the future.
We Love EdXposed
We Love LSPosed
We Love Better Future
More than 100 commits less than 20 days
Commits ยท LSPosed/LSPosed
LSPosed Framework. Contribute to LSPosed/LSPosed development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
Arakawa. said:
who made a prank about "rm -rf"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which prank? Will you share the source of the prank? Plz let us know.
Edit: Sorry, haven't noticed the quoted post, got it.
cracky.ice said:
The developer you mentioned has left the development group long ago
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The man left temporarily, but what he had done was still there. And the rest of the developers don't think rm -rf is wrong. The whole development team had problems, they even excused the malicious code. Communities should not forgive this.
LSPosed is not a good choice for Xposed: from the software itself, module scopes and Xposed Hide (White) were designed as advanced features for advanced users only, and forcing them to be enabled is abusive and will increase the learning cost for users, increase the cost for module developers, break the functionality of global modules, and make modules much less compatible. On the developer level, the LSPosed development team has been suppressing and abusing other Xposed implementations and their developers since the project's inception, attacking third-party ROM developers with web violence, and committing community divisive acts like this; one of the development team members submitted rm -rf /* malicious code to EdXposed, which was responsible for emptying CI user data. The culprit has no credibility.
mlgmxyysd said:
The man left temporarily, but what he had done was still there. And the rest of the developers don't think rm -rf is wrong. The whole development team had problems, they even excused the malicious code. Communities should not forgive this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We will never forgive.
But it is past.
We just need MORE attention before to accept any commit.
We will have bad people everywhere.
Nothing more.
mlgmxyysd said:
LSPosed is not a good choice for Xposed: from the software itself, module scopes and Xposed Hide (White) were designed as advanced features for advanced users only, and forcing them to be enabled is abusive and will increase the learning cost for users, increase the cost for module developers, break the functionality of global modules, and make modules much less compatible. On the developer level, the LSPosed development team has been suppressing and abusing other Xposed implementations and their developers since the project's inception, attacking third-party ROM developers with web violence, and committing community divisive acts like this; one of the development team members submitted rm -rf /* malicious code to EdXposed, which was responsible for emptying CI user data. The culprit has no credibility.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YES.
Xposed is for ADVANCED USERS only !!!!
Xposed is not a play for kids.
I agree with you about the difficulty for developers, but well, the future is here.
And we will not accept to remain in the past.
Long Life to LSPosed
But, we love EdXposed too
VD171 said:
YES.
Xposed is for ADVANCED USERS only !!!!
Xposed is not a play for kids.
I agree with you about the difficulty for developers, but well, the future is here.
And we will not accept to remain in the past.
Long Life to LSPosed
But, we love EdXposed too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Put away your false future, Xposed (even ROMs) will die because of LSPosed Developers. You don't know what disgusting things LSPosed Developers are doing behind the scenes.
mlgmxyysd said:
Put away your false future, Xposed (even ROMs) will die because of LSPosed Developers. You don't know what disgusting things LSPosed Developers are doing behind the scenes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The point is we need xposed for Android 9, Android 10, Android 11, Android 12, Android 13, Android 14...
We currently have no choices.
Or do you have any?
VD171 said:
The point is we need xposed for Android 9, Android 10, Android 11, Android 12, Android 13, Android 14...
We currently have no choices.
Or do you have any?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There will be, just need to wait.
mlgmxyysd said:
There will be, just need to wait.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't wait.
I have a solution, so I will use it.
But, I'm totally open for new XPOSED alternatives.
Let's keep watching
I did a test with the old original Xprivacy app. Oreo 8.1, Magisk v23, Riru v 25.4.4
With EdXposed: it works, but whole phone is slowed down. Every app is checked and Xprivacy popup asks you how to proceed (accept or deny internet/load/whatever request). It works how it should but sadly phone is slowed down and wallpaper doesn't load after phone bootup
With LSposed: it doesn't work, because: Every app just bypasses most Xprivacy functions, you only get a meaningless Binder Xprivacy popup. Xprivacy has no control over what apps do. Apps do what they want and don't ask for your permission
With Xposed Installer: it runs perfectly, flawlessly. Using the good old "Xposed Installer" with Xposed Framework version 90-beta3, the original. You know every url and request every app does, if they scan your nearby wifi, if or when they use record in cam or audio, scan your contacts, request some device identifiers, you can whitelist the urls, internet requests and loads you want. All app requests logged, apps can't do nothing without your permission. Very useful because you can use (whitelist) the functions in any app that you use and want, and dismiss the rest that's bundled within the app (ad networks, telemetry requests, proprietary functions. resource-hungry unnecessary actions). In the new XprivacyLua these features and logs and this sort of control is not possible. This is why the old original Xprivacy is superior.
jason382 said:
I did a test with the old original Xprivacy app. Oreo 8.1, Magisk v23, Riru v 25.4.4
With EdXposed: it works, but whole phone is slowed down. Every app is checked and Xprivacy popup asks you how to proceed (accept or deny internet/load/whatever request). It works how it should but sadly phone is slowed down and wallpaper doesn't load after phone bootup
With LSposed: it doesn't work, because: Every app just bypasses most Xprivacy functions, you only get a meaningless Binder Xprivacy popup. Xprivacy has no control over what apps do. Apps do what they want and don't ask for your permission
With Xposed Installer: it runs perfectly, flawlessly. Using the good old "Xposed Installer" with Xposed Framework version 90-beta3, the original. You know every url and request every app does, if they scan your nearby wifi, if or when they use record in cam or audio, scan your contacts, request some device identifiers, you can whitelist the urls, internet requests and loads you want. All app requests logged, apps can't do nothing without your permission. Very useful because you can use (whitelist) the functions in any app that you use and want, and dismiss the rest that's bundled within the app (ad networks, telemetry requests, proprietary functions. resource-hungry unnecessary actions). In the new XprivacyLua these features and logs and this sort of control is not possible. This is why the old original Xprivacy is superior.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Xprivacy is NOT superior.
Xprivacy is totally deprecated and uses old methods and old functions.
XPRIVACYLUA is totally better, superior and CUSTOMIZABLE.
XprivacyLua WORKS PERFECTLY WITH LSPOSED, because I am using it on my main phone.
I LOVE XPRIVACYLUA.
I CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT ROOT, XPOSED AND XPRIVACYLUA !!!!
I LOVE YOU @M66B
LSPosed is the future and as of this date clearly the winner as Edxposed development has halted, it's incompatible with the latest Riru and breaks Safetynet.