Has anyone heard about this, when this is coming out?
http://www.phonemag.com/mobile-internet-explorer-61-hands-on-at-ctia-042170.php
also
http://www.slashgear.com/internet-explorer-mobile-61-hands-on-from-ctia-0211021.php
it says h.264 and flash and silverlight
Is this thru?
Does somebody has it already?
6.1 was released to carriers and OEM's months ago. There is already leaked AT&T test ROM floating around with 6.1, and the cookers have had custom 6.1 ROMS out for some time also.
If you are waiting for the official release from your carrier it will probably be some time. Even though this AT&T test ROM is floating around NOW, they've said they won't have an officially released version for a few months.
As for the H.264 and Silverlight I think those will be included in the NEXT version of IE Mobile and that won't likely be seen until the END of 2008.
Hello.
I am sorry I could not post on the development thread. this is my first post. I have been checking the TI developer site and noticed that they just posted an official android Froyo devkit available for download. the link is:
software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_tii/TI_Android_DevKit/02_02_00/index_FDS.html
and the documentation is at:
/processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/TI-Android-FroYo-DevKit-V2.2_UserGuide
The source code is included and has new drivers for the SGX chip and a devkit for the WL1271 including bluetooth stack.
Also the kit include drivers for the DSP for video decoding and Flash acceleration in android.
I think this could be good to allow update to nookie froyo. I am in the process of testing the release on an OMAP 3530 dev board and will let you know.
Wow this could be just what we need!!!
Plus maybe the CM7 folk can port this over to gingerbread and deeperblue to honeycomb then we can have a true daily driver tablet as I believe these were the rate limiting steps!!!
Canadoc said:
Wow this could be just what we need!!!
Plus maybe the CM7 folk can port this over to gingerbread and deeperblue to honeycomb then we can have a true daily driver tablet as I believe these were the rate limiting steps!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kind of neat how these things pop up...
Glad to be on board with the Nook!
Fifcic said:
Hello.
I am sorry I could not post on the development thread. this is my first post. I have been checking the TI developer site and noticed that they just posted an official android Froyo devkit available for download. the link is:
software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_tii/TI_Android_DevKit/02_02_00/index_FDS.html
and the documentation is at:
/processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/TI-Android-FroYo-DevKit-V2.2_UserGuide
The source code is included and has new drivers for the SGX chip and a devkit for the WL1271 including bluetooth stack.
Also the kit include drivers for the DSP for video decoding and Flash acceleration in android.
I think this could be good to allow update to nookie froyo. I am in the process of testing the release on an OMAP 3530 dev board and will let you know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lack of OMAP36xx as supported platform (read: NC) by this release is kinda disconcerting...
Thanks for posting. I'll take a look when I get home.
aludal said:
Lack of OMAP36xx as supported platform (read: NC) by this release is kinda disconcerting...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing to understand is that all the OMAP 3 serires share the same software register interface. the part numbering is based on generation and intended market:
OMAP34xx: High Volume ODM 65nm
OMAP35xx: Embedded Low volume customers (same features as OMAP34xx)
OMAP36xx: High Volume ODM 45nm (Higher clock speed, SGX double clock speed)
AM37xx and DM 37xx: Embedded low volume customers (same features as OMAP36xx)
if you look at the release. this is intended for non ODM customers and enthousiasts access to the SDK they provide to their high volume customer. this is why the OMAP 34and 36 are not mentioned. TI provides them different SDK. the important part is that this provides a stable hardware accelerated kernel with drivers to the comunity.
the OMAP 3621 is an OMAP 3630 nutered. it has the same core but the pins to support pop memory and camera interface are not conected. It is still very powerfull as it still has the DSP and SGX core inside.
I hope this helps.
Thanks for the info - looking at it, and i do see things like the OMAP3630 stuff in there, so this may every well be a useable Kernel for Froyo. Hot damn, maybe i will try my hand at compiling again (or if we are more lucky, dalingrin will find useful stuff, and really knock our socks off. )
Fifcic said:
The thing to understand is that all the OMAP 3 serires share the same software register interface. the part numbering is based on generation and intended market:
OMAP34xx: High Volume ODM 65nm
OMAP35xx: Embedded Low volume customers (same features as OMAP34xx)
OMAP36xx: High Volume ODM 45nm (Higher clock speed, SGX double clock speed)
AM37xx and DM 37xx: Embedded low volume customers (same features as OMAP36xx)
if you look at the release. this is intended for non ODM customers and enthousiasts access to the SDK they provide to their high volume customer. this is why the OMAP 34and 36 are not mentioned. TI provides them different SDK. the important part is that this provides a stable hardware accelerated kernel with drivers to the comunity.
the OMAP 3621 is an OMAP 3630 nutered. it has the same core but the pins to support pop memory and camera interface are not conected. It is still very powerfull as it still has the DSP and SGX core inside.
I hope this helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Updated drivers/dsp, updated linux kernel and bluetooth stack! This should really make for some interesting progress with nookie froyo, BT support, CM7 and possibly even the honeycomb builds
Assuming this kernel can be made to work, yes, it should really help. Some of the thing that i was looking for that are in the eclair kernel are missing (some of the OMAP stuff specific to our hardware), though, it may be a case of taking them and dropping them in. Either way, i hope this help, as i am dying to see our hardware put to better use.
Shouldn't this be in the development thread?
haganme said:
Shouldn't this be in the development thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fifcic said:
Hello.
I am sorry I could not post on the development thread. this is my first post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but new people to the forum can't post in Dev subforum until we have 10 posts.
Somebody had linked to this thread in the Dev forum, and for some reason, the mods closed it. OK, maybe we don't need two threads, but this really should be in the dev forum. It will get more attention there, and will hopefully be seen by those who need to see it..
I linked it as i thought more devs would see it there. Got a slightly rude post in reply that devs read both so.....
Indeed, i saw that, and it was uncalled for. Fact is, this is a dev thread, and should be there. Yes, a dev MAY read this forum, but truly, I don't expect them to, and things like this need to be as visible as possible - this is not the forum for that.
So.. any actual dev care to give feedback on the usefulness of this package, or are all the dev's handing out in just the dev forum still?
will todays announcement by G/HTC that the One will be available as a plain vanilla Android on 6/26 be any better or different than a S-Off/rooted version from T-Mo US/ATT/Sprint with ones fave ROM?
Ok so I am was browsing the net and suddenly I got curious to look for atrix hd roms.
I did find things that were little patchy, however I could get some source but somehow or other that rom is protected by questions. Which definitely reffered as service not available in your country.
My hopeful enquiry is has someone any other source.
If you do please share.
not available
i have also seen for the rom on web but its not available because if it will be available then CM will be first to launch it and after that any developer can use that code to create more custom MM roms.
no news at all guys?
Hi everyone,
Can anyone please tell me the difference (if any) between the SM-T710 and SM-T713 models of the Galaxy Tab S2?
I only ask as I've seen some ROMs with the SM-T710 listed as a compatible device but the SM-T713 not listed. I've entered the model numbers into the search tool on XDA but haven't yet found any info discerning one from the other.
I tried GSM Arena website and all it shows me is that a 713 exists, but not the differences between them.
Basically, the opportunity to buy one has come up, but I want to make sure I get one that'll have better custom ROM support. So far that's looking like the 710, but will 710 compatible ROMs not work with (or possibly even damage/brick) a 713?
I'm sorry if this question has been asked before.
Thanks!!
dellaclearing said:
Hi everyone,
Can anyone please tell me the difference (if any) between the SM-T710 and SM-T713 models of the Galaxy Tab S2?
I only ask as I've seen some ROMs with the SM-T710 listed as a compatible device but the SM-T713 not listed. I've entered the model numbers into the search tool on XDA but haven't yet found any info discerning one from the other.
I tried GSM Arena website and all it shows me is that a 713 exists, but not the differences between them.
Basically, the opportunity to buy one has come up, but I want to make sure I get one that'll have better custom ROM support. So far that's looking like the 710, but will 710 compatible ROMs not work with (or possibly even damage/brick) a 713?
I'm sorry if this question has been asked before.
Thanks!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The T713 uses a Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 SoC, which supports the G3/G4/LTE radio for mobile network connection.
The T710 has a Samsung Exynos SoC.
They have similar CPU specs, but different peripherals (the radio modem stuff, different GPU, etc.)
Hope this helps.