Related
hello ppl,
just installed wm2005 ,looks awesome,though I have just issue with it,it kinda lags, when I click start,takes time for the menu to pop ,when I change programs again takes time for it to happen ,even when I close a program it takes a 6-8 seconds for it to close while in wm2003 it was instanteneous (2-3 sec)
I have installed all the patches which are posted on wiki and the ftp with the new rom,are there any more registry patches with which I can make this baby go little faster and sort this issue ,it's kinda running xp on a old machine
or everyone is facing the same problem ?
WM5.0 is slower. However, you can improve its speed by:
- Removing un-needed Today items like MSN Mobile, Spb Pocket, Resco Today plugin (if installed).
- Disable as many sound options as you can.
- Overclock your processor to 530 MHz. (This might be unsafe, do it at your own responsibility. It works great for me though).
- Set the clock to always show on all programs (Go to the clock settings and the option is available on the 3rd tab).
You'll have a smoother performance, but still not as fast as WM2003SE.
pakiyabhai, my start menu pops in a fraction of a second. And do you call 2-3 seconds instantaneous? I have almost all my programs gone and the today screen back in around 1 second on WM5! I only show the message and calendar box on the today screen, though.
thanx for the tips,
mastif hehe ,ok thanx for the correction , i have no today plugin installed,all of em are disabled
I tried the clock options ,but no diffrence as of now
I am seriously considering the overclockin option ,but won't it drain my batttery faster ?
It will, probably... try it for a day and see if it drains or reaches a critical level. If it doesn't, then that's okay you can recharge your PDA during the night I guess... on vacations, don't overclock hehe
... and just as a tip: go back to WM2003SE right away! That's what I did. First, this is still very experimental; I need a working device. Second, there's no wireless modem, and Pocket Word lacks drawing, and Powerpoint is like read-only as I saw... lots of missing features and not working ones... Slow slow slow. I'm on 1.40 i-mate ROM now with overclocked bus speed. Now that's my lovely Blue Angel :roll:
For me, WM5's speed is about 85-90% of WM2003SE, which is acceptable.
KTamas said:
For me, WM5's speed is about 85-90% of WM2003SE, which is acceptable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That may be acceptable,but the b/t problems on WM5 is not acceptable! I switched back again.
Later............... 8)
Hi,
It's been quite a while since I tested ROMS. Last one was Logout's 5.03. Have used Ivan's V3 also.
Out of curiousity before I flash my ROM to 2.3/3.0, are any of the beta versions currently available faster than the older non AKU ROMS?
If so, which one is the most stable to install? AKU2.3 or 3.0?
They are miles faster. I'd recommend AKU3.0 or the upcoming AKU3.2 from Helmi_C. AKU3 is preffered over AKU2.3 because it's slightly faster so more work is being done for that.
Thanks Biohead for answering. I'll flash Helmi's AKU3.0 beta soon and see how it goes.
Yes, faster than most...I wouldnt go as far as saying they are miles faster...and the battery life on AKU3.0 is horrible imo. That being said. I am still using it for the moment because it has the best combination of features and stability that I have found so far. this battery thing is killing me though. if battery life does not improve I will become too frustrated and have to go back to a different rom that has better performance in this regard. just my 2 cents.
-wurd
I'd reccommend one of those extended bateries regardless of which ROM you use, they are not that expensive and give you much more juice.
Wurdipus,
Why is the battery draining out fast? Is it due to some kind of self-power-on problem?
Btw, many here recommend to overclock to 520Mhz for BA to run WM5.0. Any recommendations on which software to use to do that?
mambojambo said:
Wurdipus,
Why is the battery draining out fast? Is it due to some kind of self-power-on problem?
Btw, many here recommend to overclock to 520Mhz for BA to run WM5.0. Any recommendations on which software to use to do that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not sure why battery is draining so fast. I did not have this problem with TuMa 1.4 or Ivan's latest rom. they may not have as many features/functions enabled in those other roms. I am just not sure. i dont use wifi, but i do leave GPRS connection open a lot of the time to sync email in near realtime. I did that with the other roms too though and didnt see this dramatic battery drain.
as far as overclocking goes...i use this overclock tweak that i believe mamaich wrote. if it was someone else who wrote it, forgive me for not remembering =)
edit: just as a note. this overclocking hack runs at 530Mhz when backlight is on. when backlight is off it drops back to whatever the native speed of the CPU is.
mambojambo said:
Wurdipus,
Why is the battery draining out fast? Is it due to some kind of self-power-on problem?
Btw, many here recommend to overclock to 520Mhz for BA to run WM5.0. Any recommendations on which software to use to do that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u can use xcpuscalar
Wurdipus
I tried to use that overclock but after installing I can't find it...Can you tell me how to use it ?
Her0 said:
Wurdipus
I tried to use that overclock but after installing I can't find it...Can you tell me how to use it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
once it is installed it just resides in the background. I am not sure exactly how it works, but i do know it has no GUI for control. Mamaich wrote it to simply install and run behind the scenes. If you want something you can control and adjust then xpuscalar is probably the way to go.
here is the original thread i got the .rar file from
http://forum.xda-developers.com/viewtopic.php?t=27976&highlight=overclock+mamaich
mambojambo said:
Wurdipus,
Why is the battery draining out fast? Is it due to some kind of self-power-on problem?
Btw, many here recommend to overclock to 520Mhz for BA to run WM5.0. Any recommendations on which software to use to do that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there is a know bug in all wm5 rom's on this forum and that is the BlueTooth issue. BT randomly looses itself, soft-reset needed. To work-around this someone made a patch that will wake-up your PDA every so much minutes to keep BT alive.
so turn off BT if not used. i've no battery problem.
And for overclocking i use pocket hack master. Made my tomtom to startup in 13 secs. in stead of 35 sec. on wm5. Maybe it makes battery life longer since it underclocks as well when idle.
xdaradar said:
mambojambo said:
Wurdipus,
Why is the battery draining out fast? Is it due to some kind of self-power-on problem?
Btw, many here recommend to overclock to 520Mhz for BA to run WM5.0. Any recommendations on which software to use to do that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there is a know bug in all wm5 rom's on this forum and that is the BlueTooth issue. BT randomly looses itself, soft-reset needed. To work-around this someone made a patch that will wake-up your PDA every so much minutes to keep BT alive.
so turn off BT if not used. i've no battery problem.
And for overclocking i use pocket hack master. Made my tomtom to startup in 13 secs. in stead of 35 sec. on wm5. Maybe it makes battery life longer since it underclocks as well when idle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
seems to be a lot of disconnect between threads and rom makers here. when i was using TuMa1.4 and the BT patch .dll from big mike, I didnt have this battery issue and TuMa had many many features like AKU roms have. I only wish Tuatara had gotten the time to finish 1.5 and work out the few remaining bugs. TuMa rom was best one ever imo even with all the little problems in 1.4 i still used it longer than any other....hoping they would get fixed one day. Now AKU rom is out and re introduced a lot of the old issues I had before TuMa 1.4. oh well.
its all from people volunteering time and effort to make these roms so I am not complaining! just thinking somewhere along the lines it would have been great for more interaction between rom makers to know what worked in one or the other. awesome work on all the roms and I will keep trying to help as much as I can with reports about what works and what doesnt.
on that note....one problem I have again now with the latest AKU is the phone rings for the person calling me 3 or more times before I hear a ring on my phone. by the time I can answer it has gone to voice mail. this problem was gone for awhile but now its back.
I can't agree more. IMHO this devices are sold with a tiny battery just for the sake that you'll must buy an extended one. Before I got mine, I had just a day of runup. Now I have 3, even 4 days. So, I clearly recommend buying the extended battery as a must for this devices..
Brazilian Joe said:
I'd reccommend one of those extended bateries regardless of which ROM you use, they are not that expensive and give you much more juice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would be thankful, though, that the following issue would be solved:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/viewtopic.php?t=59477&highlight=
I give you my support, shall our gurus need hands for testing or something else.. don't hesitate on asking! 8)
Biohead said:
They are miles faster. I'd recommend AKU3.0 or the upcoming AKU3.2 from Helmi_C. AKU3 is preffered over AKU2.3 because it's slightly faster so more work is being done for that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would be thankful, though, that the following issue would be solved:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/viewtopic.php?t=59477&highlight=
I give you my support, shall our gurus need hands for testing or something else.. don't hesitate on asking! 8)
Biohead said:
They are miles faster. I'd recommend AKU3.0 or the upcoming AKU3.2 from Helmi_C. AKU3 is preffered over AKU2.3 because it's slightly faster so more work is being done for that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go back to 2003 these roms are a disgrace to microsoft haha go billy gates!
Well if you can't use it - do not use it.
The main point (if you did not notice) is tath there is no official release of WM5 for BA. Thus, saying something about Microsoft's OS that was not designed/adjusted for a given hardware is the same as complaining about stupid Ferrari engine that cannot be installed into a regular Renault.
Ive only had my Blue Angel for a couple of weeks (converted from Symbian UIQ)
I decided to try the lastest Helmi 1.3 and so far it's been great
OK there are a couple of issues but so far i've been happy.
I now no longer backup the phone on a daily basis and have not needed to soft reset for ages , with 2003 it was getting to be a pain in the neck.
Also my bluetooth headset has much better quality on WM5 with no static
So i for one am happy
Explain what problems you're having!!
The AKU ROM's are the best of the lot I say - and I will go as far as saying Helmi's AKU3.2 is as fast as 2003SE (and prettier!). It's stable, most programs work and still being improved!
machmandp said:
I now no longer backup the phone on a daily basis
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
<aol>me too!!</aol>
Knowing that running down the battery isn't going to zap your phone is great. Thanks again to all those who helped bring WM5 to the blue angel!!
Personally, I'm still on helmi 1.2 and I find it to be just as reliable or moreso than WM2003.
fraser said:
machmandp said:
I now no longer backup the phone on a daily basis
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
<aol>me too!!</aol>
Knowing that running down the battery isn't going to zap your phone is great. Thanks again to all those who helped bring WM5 to the blue angel!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, can anyone tell me what is the lifespan of the backup battery? 2 nights ago, before i slept i plugged my BA with only 3hrs remaining battery life... woke up 9 hrs after to see that i forgot to plug the charger to the wall outlet! immediately plugged it in and the BA soft resetted, but lo and behold, everything is still there!
and here's the twist, all my most often used apps are installed in the ramdisk!
can 2003se beat that?
I suggest you first research and review WM5 on BA before complaining, because if you complain without first knowing what you are talking about you, you'll easily turn to an IDIOT in the forums (pun not intended)
Um....why all the replies to a 12 year old proving he's cool?
Indeed. I wonder why he even has the brains to be able to know how to use a browser... or even plug in his computer
I have also converted to Helmi 1.3 and although WM5 was alittle slow, this is no fault of the Rom but the fact that the OS was desgined for faster CPU's. installed XCPUScalar and pumped up the cpu speed from 400 to 530, and yeah sure i do get less battery life, but for me that is not an issue, as I charge while at work.
I am alot happier and although the odd lock up happens, it a helava-lot better than 2003SE
Are you guys F..... crazy
Whay dont you use some programs like Destinator 6 or Tomtom Navigator 5, and check the performance while navigate on maps.
This versions of WM5 are too slow, compared with 2003SE.
I have tested all the versions with no lucky, all GPS programs on WM5 for BlueAngel has a lot of lag on maps.
I have no problems with TomTom... No lags (except long start-up), no hangs, etc...
Re: Are you guys F..... crazy
cyberbit said:
Whay dont you use some programs like Destinator 6 or Tomtom Navigator 5, and check the performance while navigate on maps.
This versions of WM5 are too slow, compared with 2003SE.
I have tested all the versions with no lucky, all GPS programs on WM5 for BlueAngel has a lot of lag on maps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont have a problem with TomTom5 as well. True slightly slow start but never any lags or problems. i think ur problem maybe that your cpu is still set to 400mhz and that where tomtom is suffering. pump up ur cpu and see if that helps.
fa147 said:
I have also converted to Helmi 1.3 and although WM5 was alittle slow, this is no fault of the Rom but the fact that the OS was desgined for faster CPU's. installed XCPUScalar and pumped up the cpu speed from 400 to 530, and yeah sure i do get less battery life, but for me that is not an issue, as I charge while at work.
I am alot happier and although the odd lock up happens, it a helava-lot better than 2003SE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The speed of the CPU isn't the problem, its the type of flash memory used on older pre-WM5 devices.. sure upping the clock helps as I run mine at 590 all the time, but fact of the matter is this is about the fastest we'll ever see WM5 on our BAs because of this hardware problem
Installing to the RAM disk reduces this problem, that's why it's there. The RAM storage is much faster than the ROM areas.
fraser said:
Installing to the RAM disk reduces this problem, that's why it's there. The RAM storage is much faster than the ROM areas.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this 'RAM' the one which zeros itself after battery fully drains?
Yes, but I've had that happen once in 18 months of having the BA. If you only install accessory software to the ramdisk, a reset won't cause you much hastle other than having to reinstall a couple of applications.
I detest the PC installation of apps over activesync now as it unnessarilly clutters up your PC. I just keep all of the cab files a directory on the sdcard. I can hard reset and get everything installed really quickly this way.
So under normal conditions a softreset won't erase data on RAM disk?
nonereal said:
So under normal conditions a softreset won't erase data on RAM disk?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's correct. You'd need to either drain the backup battery completely or hard-reset to lose it. It could still happen, which is why I only install apps there. Don't keep any personal docs etc. just in case.
Thnx Fraser
http://www.oliy.co.uk/download.asp?dir=\software\OmapScaler
it is working fine in my wizard but some ppl complain about causing soft resets or not working at all:
about resets: ver .11 have a "max clock step" option, try to reduce it, my wizard works fine with 50 but some ppl r using 25 or even 20...
about not working at all:
1- unpack
2- copy to windows folder in device
3- copy also omapclock.exe to windows folder in device
ftp://xda:[email protected]/Wizard/Misc/OmapClock_v0.2.zip
4- create an icon or run manually
5- set ur desired options and press save
6- copy the .lnk created to windows\startup so it stats with windows everytime (but test it carefully before doing so or u can end with a neverending soft-reset cycle)
my config (working)
- overclock marked and 240mhz (some ppl report soft resets over 220,
reduce this number also)
- above 70%
- underclock marked and 120mhz
- below 30%
- default speed 214mhz (this is the speed center, used if u dont mark
overclock or underclock)
- max clock step 50 (if u have soft resets reduce this number)(mine
work fine at 50 but resets over 70 as example)
- update period 2000 i guess this is the time between system
monitoring of speed in miliseconds, but please correct me if im wrong
- clock threshold 2 (i guess this is the step between clock changes,
but im not sure what is a period...maybe an internal clock tick?)
ok, i tested this one, if u increase it it takes more time between clock changes,
another thing to try to solve soft-resets, i tested 3 and 4...and takes more time
between changes...
some comment: it speeds up depending on the cpu usage but for some reason it dont get along fine with agile messenger in my setup...if agile is connecting it appear as if the device hang but in fact it resumes operation in 10 secs or so...so try to test it first without loaded applications...then load 1 by 1 and test...
lets talk about this and try to solve problems for the ones that have them...
btw...im using molskis rom and working flawlesly...
hi, there,
I followed your instruction fully.
however, when I clicked Omapscaler, I got an "error exception".
I wanted to show you the details..... but I couldn't "copy & paste" the message.
Noted that, I have been running smartskey + Omapclock at 252 stably for long time, and now with Risidoro 2.26 ROM.
hope to get it working.......
thanks,
ecchi
Cool, I'll give this a try ASAP and report back
Activesync quits
I installed the Omapscaler. It seems to work fine. I have it set fairly conservative - middle at 200, underclock at 170 and overclock at 230.
If I am connected to activesync, it quits after a few minutes of idle time. Have you noticed this?
-Kal.
Mine does the same, but in my case it puts a red cross over the green circle, it didnt sync anymore but i can explore the wizard files...and it does it also without the omapscaler, i guess that that have some relation maybe with the proccessor clock losing sync with the pc...dunno...but in my case is not related to omapscaler...but related with the overclock...
Yeah, I saw the same problem with ActiveSync and rom updates.
Just disable the omapscaler, run omapclock and set the speed to 200 or so, then try again.
Oliy, great program, thank you
Again...in my case i tested activesync just using omapclock (NO omapscaler) and does exactly the same...
Since I got the "error exception" with Omapscalar.witrh my current ROM (risidoro), I have started trying XCPUScalar. However, it is not any more stabler as some ppl had mentioned.
Bottom line:
Omap + smartskey ==> most stable, tried at 252, but about 1 day of battery only.
XCPUscalar ==> fixed at 232, stable. fixed at 247 reboot sometimes. Autoscaling b/t 117 and 247 reboot 50% of the time when you launch/close/activesync. I am testing now autoscaling between 117 and 232. Hope it will work.
soft resets with max clock step at 10
I had the max clock step at the default 50, and got a soft reset. Then, per the advice on this thread, I reduced it all the way down to 10. It still soft resets. I have top speed at 230, default at 200, and bottom at 170.
So, I am giving up on this program.
just a q. it stays at least some seconds or die instantly? omapclock alone works?
Yes, it stays up for a while. It seems like it stays up until it goes into standby mode, or I put it in standby manually. A bit after that, it soft resets.
I have not used Omapclock by itself. I have never felt the need for it. But, something that automatically scales up and down to suit the load seems very useful to me; so I tried it. I am willing to keep trying it, if there are bug fix versions.
-Kal.
Maybe ur problem is with the overclock per se, not omapscaler...try using the device with omapclock fixed...if ur device resets then omapscaler is not the faulty...also, what rom do u have? maybe we can pinpoint the problem to a specific rom or set of roms...
hmm... the problem cannot be overclocking, because it goes into the soft reset directly from standby mode. I would think it would be *underclocking* when it is on standby mode, no? Let me do some experimentation with both overclocking and underclocking using smarskey with omapclock, and see what I can figure out. But somehow I doubt that is the issue.
I have standard stock Cingular 2.25.11 rom.
-Kal.
I have been running Omapclock at 230MHz for a while now, with no problems. The Omapscaler would have definitely reset by now.
And what device exactly and with what rom do u have?
It's a Cingular 8125 device, ROM version 2.25.11.1 WWE (stock ROM that came with the device from Cingular).
Omapclock has been running for almost a day now, with no problems, so the problem must be with the scaler.
-Kal.
A theory...
In case the developer is monitoring this thread:
I saw in the other thread on this forum that someone reported that XCPUScaler has the same problem as I have with resetting when in standby mode on a Cingular 8125 with stock rom as well. It may be that these units have some kind of daemon processes that run even while the unit is standby (I know for instance that my unit retreives email when in standby mode), and that causes activity that pushes the scaler to try to scale up. And maybe the unit (or the rom os version) doesn't like the processer speed being mucked around when in standby mode. Or maybe, even that the API call to sense the CPU load craps out when in standby.
This is a conjecture of course, but it seems to me that there can't be very heavy activity during standby. So, could the developer please try to disable scaling when in standby mode? This may solve the problem. Or maybe, just make that an option that people with this kind of a problem can select.
Just a suggestion...
-Kal.
error exception log
I can run omapclock with smartskey @252 stable.
But when I reconfig my wizard to use omapscaler, I got the following exception on launch:
=============================================
OmapScaler.exe
Exception
CompareInfoRef::.ctor+0x35
CompareInfoCache::GetCompareInfoRef+0x9c
CompareInfo::GetCompareInfo+0xc
CultureInfo::get_CompareInfo+0x19
DataTable::RecomputeCompareInfo+0x11
DataTable::Reset+0x6
DataTable::.ctor+0x113
DataTable::.ctor+0x6
ConfigDB::setupConfigDB+0x32
ConfigDB::Load+0x2a
ConfigManager::setupConfigDB+0x14
ConfigManager::Get+0xc
ConfigManager::get_ocLoad+0x15
CpuClocker::readConfigSettings+0xb
CpuClocker::.ctor+0x56
MainForm::MainForm_Load+0xb
Form::OnLoad+0x15
Form::_SetVisibleNotify+0x1d
Control::set_Visible+0x1f
Application::Run+0x7
MainForm::Main+0xa
==========================================
I have a Molski Rom WWE (30MB) G3 Wiza, installed with CE Star (language tool), and some 7 today plug-ins.
any idea?
astromusic said:
In case the developer is monitoring this thread:
I saw in the other thread on this forum that someone reported that XCPUScaler has the same problem as I have with resetting when in standby mode on a Cingular 8125 with stock rom as well. It may be that these units have some kind of daemon processes that run even while the unit is standby (I know for instance that my unit retreives email when in standby mode), and that causes activity that pushes the scaler to try to scale up. And maybe the unit (or the rom os version) doesn't like the processer speed being mucked around when in standby mode. Or maybe, even that the API call to sense the CPU load craps out when in standby.
This is a conjecture of course, but it seems to me that there can't be very heavy activity during standby. So, could the developer please try to disable scaling when in standby mode? This may solve the problem. Or maybe, just make that an option that people with this kind of a problem can select.
Just a suggestion...
-Kal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have read around that there r several levels of standby, full, partial, etc...maybe he only need to modify it to work only on "full on"...
but maybe we r both wrong thinking about it a lil longer...maybe he already thought about that and omapscaler dont work when on any kind of partial standby, in any case the device is in standby, u r not going to notice if it takes 20 more seconds downloading the mail as example...
and btw, xcpuscalar didnt worked for me also, random softresets, but omapscaler worked like a charm (now im using batterystatus solution and also works fine)
It seems that my phone will sometimes randomly start running out of battery really fast and memmaid shows that the process filesys.exe is taking up the processor at a 100% load. I know that this is part of how windows mobile accesses its storage systems, but I doubt that it's normal. Anyone else having the same problem?
All red items have been uninstalled to see if they were the cause.
I'm running:
Touch-IT full ROM
Battery Status beta 1.04
Default Company Picture Viewer
S2U2 0.5
PocketCM Contacts 0.15
ClearTemp
OP3 ShortCode
FlashVideoBundle
Picsel Browser (Which BTW since installing has made my free space significantly shrink...)
vTap
TRE (reg editor)
memmaid demo
PocketTweak
Pocket Notepad
tGetFile.dll
PocketWeather
HTC Home
Total Commander
psShutXP
Mobile Office
hmm... That list suddently feels a lot longer than it did before. lol
But nothing is running in the background with the exception of ActiveSync.
Thanks guys
Update: Here's a list of what modules filesys.exe has loaded according to Memmaid:
Threads: 24
encfilt.dll
coredll.dll.0409.MUI
ole32.dll
sqlcese30.sys.dll
MSASN1.dll
crypt32.dll
rsaenh.dll
discache.dll
LSFILTER.dll
fsreplxfilt.dll
cachefilt.dll
fatsd.dll
cecompr.dll
HtcFsdspy.dll
imgfs.dll
mspart.dll
trueFFS.dll
Fsdmgr.dll
certmod.dll
coredll.dll
Update: It seems that the two coredll's are taking the most resources, but I can't test this out as I don't have any software that can break it down for me, except for abctaskman or whatever it's called and that's only a demo so it won't show me which module is using what other than the other of their CPU usage.
UPDATE: I thought that maybe it was a similar issue to this, but that it was running the compaction on my memory card since I had set the volatile temp to run from that... but that hit a wall as well when I made it run on the main memory again.
UPDATE: I forgot to mention that I also have the Extended ROM enabled as well.
MODS, can we please move this to one of the general forums? I'm not sure which one would be best, though....
OK, so far I've found out that it's a problem not only with this ROM but with WM5 on other devices.
Here is a patch for another device and OS. What I'm trying to figure out is what exactly he patched so we can do the same to our file for our phones.
HI !
I run the German Touch-IT Rom with S2U2 and have the same Problems. Here is what i found out:
- Battery drains in 3-4 Hours IF mortplayer has been started. I usually use Mortplayer to wake me up in the morning. My Music is stored on the SD Card, but this has always been this way.
- I have problems with the batteriy since S2U2 was installed.
-> Maybe Su2u does not suspend our Herald, so that the SD-Card is not suspended, too. Maybe filesys.exe (and with this mortplayer and also HTC Home) randomly ask if the card is still available - Which consumes a lot of power.
...
What do you think ?
I will delete S2U2 when i don´t need the wakeup function this weekend
Hmm... It started around the same time that I added S2U2... I'll try to remove it and see what happens.
I temporarily disabled S2U2 but no change.
Updated with more info.
I hate to bump my own thread, but it seems that updating the thread doesn't bring it up any higher. I wonder if anyone else was having the same exact issue?
I'm determined to solve this problem, as it brings my battery life to a sad 6 hours if the EDGE is on, about 9 hours when it's not. And that's with me underclocking it half the time... and the screen brightness down... and with the phone in "hybernate" or whatever you call the screen being off most of the day...
S2U2 actually did dramatically decrease my battery life... Uninstalling fixed it. Just thought I'd say that; I don't know anything about your other issues, sorry.
I have the same problem too on a mda vario (wizard) with wm6 rom(Dutch version) more info about the rom: http://cleanimport.xda/index.php?threads/350255/
I have been searching around for a solution. But I could not find one.
Here is my list of the modules filesys.exe has loaded according to Memmaid:
Threads: 17
encfilt.dll
coredll.dll.0409.MUI
ole32.dll
sqlcese30.sys.dll
MSASN1.dll
crypt32.dll
rsaenh.dll
discache.dll
fsreplxfilt.dll
cachefilt.dll
fatsd.dll
cecompr.dll
HtcFsdspy.dll
imgfs.dll
mspart.dll
trueFFS.dll
Fsdmgr.dll
certmod.dll
coredll.dll
Does anyone have found a solution for this problem?
whixh general??
there is "development and hacking" or "modifying and upgrading" i´m also NOT sure
S2U2 has also caused a battery drain on my wing as well. As i am sure it is the #1 reason my wing will crash (lock up) then when i reboot the wing it freezez permently on the password screen. i have tried numberious soft resets. with and without the microsd in... eventually i have to hard reset!
all applications that is running on your homescreen is consuming battery, because its constantly loaded in memory.
If you want a battery that last long, you need to remove sd-card, htc home, cube, touchflo, point-ui or w/e you use to make your device look cool.
you can put it this way, the more stuff you have, the more cool stuf you have, the faster is your battery draining. Ofcourse you can run BS and set up your device with tweaks and w/e, but in the end it all comes to what you want, lasting battery or a "cool" looking device.
In my personal rom, I use htc home, I like it. I use actionscreen and random acces. I have BS to configure battery usage, I deleted EVERYTHING that I dont use in the rom, and yes, it last way longer then fully or moderate loaded roms, but im sure if I kept only basic os, i could prolong battery with a day or two, but I dont need that. I have a device that is compatible to run so many cool things, and I have it because of the many features.
If you can figure out what you want to use in a daily basis, and you can manage to stay away from the heavy eyecandy-stuff (wich you keep to impress your friends) then you can have a longer batterylife
hi guys,
i had the same problem with S2U2, but since i use the cpu-scaler in battery status it's ok.
My battery lifes 3-4 days.
My settings from cpu-scaler: 130 - 201 - 234 without boost.
so i hope this will help you to cause your problem.
mxstyles said:
hi guys,
i had the same problem with S2U2, but since i use the cpu-scaler in battery status it's ok.
My battery lifes 3-4 days.
My settings from cpu-scaler: 130 - 201 - 234 without boost.
so i hope this will help you to cause your problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3-4 days!? is that with no data usage, no talking, pretty much letting ur phone just sit on the table? because the ABSOLUTE most i can get is 1 1/2 days. That sounds a lil too extreme...
did someones try filesys patcher from aximsite?
i'm using gprs over bt always on, a2dp (3-4hours daily), ~50 sms, opera mini and mobilegadu (im) and after 20hours i still got ~40% on this battery and this unit. i had another herald earlier and it was not possible to have 12hours without charging...
and btw - ive got s2u2 running all time and after it is cooked into rom its not using so much energy..
but a2dp draining more battery than on other devices (wizard, universal...)
nKiwan said:
3-4 days!? is that with no data usage, no talking, pretty much letting ur phone just sit on the table? because the ABSOLUTE most i can get is 1 1/2 days. That sounds a lil too extreme...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, i uses my phone every day for 20min calling, 30sms and 1 hour gprs internet.
I used to have O2 Neo as my device, and when I tried to install "some apps from HTC rom", I notice a warning about battery drain bug of HTC Camera from some mods and admins in another forum.
Now I owned a HTC P4350 and have HTC Camera as defaul camera app on ROM. My battery always drains above 100mA or even 300mA . Do you think that it's caused by the HTC Camera appplication ? any idea how to remove it from ROM ????
mxstyles said:
hi guys,
i had the same problem with S2U2, but since i use the cpu-scaler in battery status it's ok.
My battery lifes 3-4 days.
My settings from cpu-scaler: 130 - 201 - 234 without boost.
so i hope this will help you to cause your problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello
Here the same. After I uninstalled S2U2 the battery was longer full.
Regards, Tommy
I seem to also have a problem with S2U2 on the LGKS20. Its a pity because its not just eye candy - its the only app I ever found that prevents accidental answer etc.. I also had massive battery drain with SPB mobile shell. bummer