Hi,
the Kaiser has USB-speed specified with 480 Mbit, but the speed to put onto it some MP3s via ActiveSync is not much faster than with my Magician (USB1.1) before. If I put in my computer directly the MicroSD card (max 5MB/sec) it is much faster although 5MB/sec << 480 Mbit. So the weak point is not the card. Is there any idea to increase the speed filling my card via direct USB connection ?
Thanks in advance !
Best,
Hugo
Your usb data speed depends on what your com port is set to. if you have alot of usb ports then they share the bandwidth between them. so you may only get 20% of your actuall bandwidth if you have a few other usb devices sharing the bandwidth. you can go to your device manager on your pc and increase the percentage your com port uses of the bandwidth
Thanks for your answer,
and you may be right, if I had a lot of devices conncted to my PC. But I have not. The point is: If I put the microsd into an USB adaptor and connected to the PC, it is quite fast, if I took the Kaiser connecting it ti the same USB, it is slow.
Any other thoughts?
Best,
Hugo
thehugonline said:
If I put the microsd into an USB adaptor and connected to the PC, it is quite fast, if I took the Kaiser connecting it ti the same USB, it is slow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This holds true for all PDA devices connected via USB...not just the Kaiser...activesync may be the bottleneck.
Ok,
if ActiveSync may be the bottleneck, how do you work around this slow copy-process? With CardExpord it is quite faster than with ActiveSync (thanks for the hint), but still far away from the limit :
To copy 58 MB from PC to Magician via CardExport - it needed 94 sec
58 MB from PC to Kaiser via CardExport - 69 sec
58 MB from PC to Kaiser via ActiveSync - 235 sec
58 MB from PC to Card via USB Adaptor - 12 sec = 39 MB/ sec
Anybody any idea to increase the speed of CardExport, there is still much room left ?
Thanks for that discussion!
Best,
Hugo
Most SW connecting to your PDA for file transfer do it through Activesync which as stated before is a bad bottleneck (its sloooow).
You are also using the file handling system of the PDA via this method and any number of background tasks will slow this down.
WM5torage (there is a thread running on here) gets around using Activesync so it may be worthwhile contacting the author to see if this will work for you or wether it could be modified for your purposes.
Hope this helps.
Read the specs carefully. It says "USB 2.0 Full Speed". Don't confuse Full Speed (12 Mbps) with High Speed (480 Mbps). What HTC is doing when they say this is commonly called "deception"!
Has anyone tried ActiveSync over Bluetooth to test whether the Kaiser supports EDR?
Ahhh, abu, you seem to be following me to flame!!
Let's just help people please???
EDR (Enhanced data rate) is fully implemented on this device as was not the case with the TyTn (Hermes) and you will find some of my old threads in there about this very subject that you have placed within this thread ( not whatsoever to do with the first post I may add!!)
OH flippin eck! the wine is taking over.
even usb harddisks max out at about 30MB/sec
and as pda's cant keep up with fast flash cards
it's silly to believe that pda's could keep up with
usb2 speeds
Rudegar said:
even usb harddisks max out at about 30MB/sec
and as pda's cant keep up with fast flash cards
it's silly to believe that pda's could keep up with
usb2 speeds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love your sig file lol...
Hey good discussion,
I am a bit disappointed of the advertised 480 Mbit (ok in manual there is mentioned USB 2.0 full speed) but I can only see an advatage of 25% against my old Magician with USB 1.1. and even 12 Mbps (USB 2.0 full speed) should result in douple speed as the measured. I did not expect 480 Mbit, but a bit more speed, than currently offered.
Best,
Hugo
well chicks dig it
well some would be bound to somewhere somehow
Farsquidge said:
Ahhh, abu, you seem to be following me to flame!!
Let's just help people please???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry Farsquidge, that my comment about video driver issues was spiced with a pinch of sarcasm. But here I am trying to be purely factual.
EDR is clearly mentioned as supported. I haven't tried this myself yet. But this will probably be slower than ActiveSync over USB as Bluetooth 2.0+EDR is 3 Mbps compared to Full Speed USB at 12 Mbps.
thehugonline said:
I am a bit disappointed of the advertised 480 Mbit (ok in manual there is mentioned USB 2.0 full speed) . . .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note that they never advertised "480 Mbit". When they say Full Speed then that means 12 Mbps. That they throw in "USB 2.0" in front of this is IMO not entirely honest.
abubasim said:
Sorry Farsquidge, that my comment about video driver issues was spiced with a pinch of sarcasm. But here I am trying to be purely factual.
EDR is clearly mentioned as supported. I haven't tried this myself yet. But this will probably be slower than ActiveSync over USB as Bluetooth 2.0+EDR is 3 Mbps compared to Full Speed USB at 12 Mbps.
Note that they never advertised "480 Mbit". When they say Full Speed then that means 12 Mbps. That they throw in "USB 2.0" in front of this is IMO not entirely honest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, it could be taken as misleading.
I have never actually synced with BT as I only have my usb cable at work but I have just tried it and it seems much faster than cable connect. May just bring my charger from now on!
USB speeds are the maximum theoretical badwidth of the hardware, and are much highe than what can actually be achieved... Throw in ActiveSync, and USB speed is virtually meaningless...
Understood,
USB 2.0 was missunderstood as 480 Mbit by several (!) professional journals and websites testing mobiles and PDAs and -reading that- by me. Ok my mistake - next time I will directly come here and look for spec...
What I read in the threads above is:
"Mobile has USB 2.0, but do not expect 480 Mbit as it's only full speed, but don't be silly to believe to get real 12 Mbit as there is a big difference between hardware and spec. You really have to be satisfied, if you get real 6.5 Mbit, which is 25% faster than the USB 1.1 Magician."
In the end I am happy, not to get slower...
Thanks for discussion,
Best
Hugo
Related
I've searched for a long time and have done much research. Does anyone know of a definitive way to tether my Kaiser to my Mac running tiger? I've come across USB modem and PDAnet but I don't think they're solutions for me. PDAnet is specifically for Windows only. I know missing sync used to cooperate with Internet Sharing via usb but I'm not sure if that still works. Anyway I was hoping one of you geniuses might have a clue for me. As always, thanks very much for you time.
If you haven't stumbled upon this already, try WM WiFiRouter - http://www.wmwifirouter.com
WiFiRouter works for me. I get decent reliable connectivity w/ the Kaiser - On Rogers (contract account) tethered on 3G, average 1,550-2,500 kbps (speedtest) downloads. On AT&T (prepaid), average 500-1,250 kbps... perhaps slower as it's prepaid? To keep the battery topped up, I try charging the Kaiser w/ AC or via USB (trickle only).
Before WiFiRouter, I slaved through trying to get Mobile Stream's USB Modem to work. I gave up as the connection was really slow, and at the time, only available via bluetooth dun...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=383651
I did receive an email in early June stating that USB Modem now supports USB connection to OSX. They provided the following link:
http://mobile-stream.com/demos/usbmodem_wm_trial.zip
Cheers.
definitely wmwifirouter
This application is a godsend and is quite obviously your solution versus USB tethering. Just take my word for it and buy it right now, http://wmwifirouter.com, or let me offer you a few reasons:
Firstly, the Kaiser does not have high-speed USB 2.0 (480Mb/s), it has theoretical "full speed" of 12Mb/s which in reality is nowhere near 12Mb/s and may be slower than what your HSDPA/UMTS/whatever connection can pump whereas wifi g's theoretical speed is a comfy 54Mb/s. So you elimintate a potential limiting reagent. Probably not an issue but maybe depending on your setup and location's coverage.
Secondly, when you're transferring data at speeds in excess of maybe 90KBytes/sec on the Kaiser while tethered, the Kaiser may start to eat over 500mA when your USB feed only pumps in, tops, a 500mA charge. With wifi, even though the wifi radio adds more consumption obviously, you've still got that little USB jack free to plug in your wall charger which gives it a steady amp, allowing you to bring in, in my experience with this program, up to 470KBytes/sec without discharging (though it gets hot as hell). Typically, either with bittorrent connected to many peers and pumping out 20KB/s or just a straight download of a Linux distro from a single server I get about 200KBytes/sec incoming with WMWifiRouter which competes with my home broadband with acceptable latency (low hundreds).
Maybe you're thinking, "Well, I'll be using this on the train where I can't plug in a charger so I should try to figure out how to do this with USB so I don't completely empty my phone before I get to work." Think again! Off-hand I don't remember exactly how much additional power the wifi radio on the Kaiser eats on its low setting, but you can just pop in USB into an Mac that's unconfigured for USBing with the phone and still get your ~500mA charge. Also you can play Robin Hood and hook your trainmates up with internet.
Thirdly, with this badass application, you can turn your phone essentially into an apparently full-fledged (albiet ad-hoc) router connected to the internet via DSL with mediocre latency: You can hook up multiple devices, you don't need to configure anything (most of the time you just install it, run it and click connect), if you go under a tunnel and lose the connection or you accidentally flip that dumb switch on your laptop and lose your wifi but turn it back on, no problem, it reconnects for you with the screen off. Up to 128 WEP if you're paranoid. I haven't tried it but according to Chainfire's commercial website you can feed internet from your phone into a normal router in order to get WPA. Port mapping, DMZ, traffic stats, you name it.
Hell, forget the technical reasons and just get it because it's fascinating to see what your phone can do with the right coding from some bloke not employed by AT&T or HTC or anyone up until the program left beta. But please, do not pirate the program. Don't. Chainfire's asking for twenty pounds/forty bucks for something he put hundreds (thousands?) of hours into that gives your phone a certain god-like quality.
hi
i boght my Kaiser form a friend about 3 days ago and it has hyperdragon IV (september 2008 release) ROM on it.
my complain about it is that the data transfer between pc and fone is very slow. it takes about 17-20 minutes to copy a 175mb file on the fone's SD HC 4gb card (while the card is in the fone). i connect the fone in ActiveSync mode.
in SETTINGS/CONNECTION/USB TO PC i cannot select the option DISK DRIVE as it says that this option need a memory card in the device and it asks me to insert the card. the card is already there, i have files and programs installed on it. what can i do to speed up my transfers?
thanks in advance.
daJudge2010 said:
hi
i boght my Kaiser form a friend about 3 days ago and it has hyperdragon IV (september 2008 release) ROM on it.
my complain about it is that the data transfer between pc and fone is very slow. it takes about 17-20 minutes to copy a 175mb file on the fone's SD HC 4gb card (while the card is in the fone). i connect the fone in ActiveSync mode.
in SETTINGS/CONNECTION/USB TO PC i cannot select the option DISK DRIVE as it says that this option need a memory card in the device and it asks me to insert the card. the card is already there, i have files and programs installed on it. what can i do to speed up my transfers?
thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest 17-20 minutes for 175MB doesn't sound that far out. Transfer speeds will be less than USB 1.1. If its just small files I use ActiveSync, if its anything big (Maps etc) then I use a Micro-SD/USB memory card reader which is much, much faster.
As for your issues with the DISK DRIVE option in the USB connection settings I would post for help in the HyperDragon thread (or search the thread first...)
Andy
ADB100 said:
I would post for help in the HyperDragon thread (or search the thread first...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with Andy, that's a question for that ROM's thread. I'm running a 6.5 rom and have the same problem.
USB1.1 is slow and it's the nature of the beast. If you're going to transfer a lot of files, pull the MicroSD and buzz the files over manually.
With ActiveSync is normal speed ...if you want more speed you can use a version of Softick Card Export and you can transfer with 700-800 KB/s ...and if you want much more speed use a card reader.
i understand what r saying . but i must correct u : on GSMARENA it says that the fone has USB 2.0.
The phone is USB2.0 compliant, meaning it can be used on a USB2.0 host, but that doesn't mean it supports the "hi-speed" mode added by USB2.0. And it indeed doesn't.
I think is something strange with data transfer using USB ...probably antothers missing drivers ...I don't know.
Extract from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usb :
Code:
USB supports following data rates:
* The Full Speed rate of 12 Mbit/s (1.5 MB/s) is the basic USB data rate defined by USB 1.1. All USB hubs support Full Speed.
* A Low Speed rate of 1.5 Mbit/s (187.5 kB/s) is defined by USB 1.0. It is very similar to full speed operation except that each bit takes 8 times as long to transmit. It is intended primarily to save cost in low-bandwidth Human Interface Devices (HID) such as keyboards, mice, and joysticks.
* A High-Speed (USB 2.0) rate of 480 Mbit/s (60 MB/s) was introduced in 2001. All high-speed devices are capable of falling back to full-speed operation if necessary.
Experimental data rate:
* A SuperSpeed (USB 3.0) rate of 5.0 Gbit/s (625 MB/s). The USB 3.0 specification was released by Intel and its partners in August 2008, according to early reports from CNET news. Products using the 3.0 specification are expected to arrive in 2009 or 2010.
So , using my device in USB mass storage mode I can transfer with 1/2 from the full speed rate of USB 1.1
kilrah said:
The phone is USB2.0 compliant, meaning it can be used on a USB2.0 host, but that doesn't mean it supports the "hi-speed" mode added by USB2.0. And it indeed doesn't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think USB2.0 means hi-speed, if it not supports it isn't USB 2.0 ....is USB 1.1 or USB 1.0 ...maybe I'm wrong ...but if somebody have more knowledges about USB please corect me.
Not quite so black and white
breakx said:
I think USB2.0 means hi-speed, if it not supports it isn't USB 2.0 ....is USB 1.1 or USB 1.0 ...maybe I'm wrong ...but if somebody have more knowledges about USB please corect me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These days USB 2.0 is pretty much synonymous with Hi Speed but when USB 2.0 first came out it could also mean 'Full Speed' and you had to be careful not to get 'tricked' into a 'Full Speed' (vs. Hi Speed) bit of kit.
This topic has been done to death in several threads, heres one I contributed to slow copying to SD card Note the fact that it's not so much the USB hardware limitations that cause it to be as slow as treacle, it's the huge bottleneck that Microsoft (in)Activesync imposes (hence why copying to a card reader on a USB 1.1 port is still much faster than using Activesync via a USB 2.0 Port). Activesync is really a major weakness with Microsofts Mobile Phone OS Strategy IMO.
breakx said:
I think USB2.0 means hi-speed, if it not supports it isn't USB 2.0 ....is USB 1.1 or USB 1.0 ...maybe I'm wrong ...but if somebody have more knowledges about USB please corect me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I just said it above!
USB2.0 includes all 3 speeds, low, full and high. So a device that only uses full speed is included in the standard. Compliance with USB2.0 means that the device will work on an USB2.0 concentrator, that's all. This because at the beginning of USB2.0 you usually had both USB2.0 and USB1.1 ports on computers, and some USB1.1 devices would not work if connected to USB2.0 ports due to stricter timing requirements.
People now assume that USB2.0 = High speed, but as Flying Kiwi said it it's only because it is true in the majority of cases, in the books it's not a requirement.
Howdy y'all,
I noticed this first on my purely-stock ROM, and I was hoping that ViperROM might fix this, but no luck. When copying files to or from the internal storage to my Windows 8 64-bit ultrabook, it takes about 45 minutes for 500 megabytes. To back up my phone, I have to leave it transferring literally all night.
I know that my laptop has ONLY USB 3.0 ports, so I don't know if this somehow causes a problem with the HTC One? As annoying as it sounds, I might have try getting the USB host cable and using a standalone stick to transfer this stuff.
A little off-topic, but I'm really starting to get impacted by this lack of storage... 32GB? That's abysmal... I take my photos in Zoe mode, and I filled up my storage the first weekend I owned this thing, with casual sightseeing camera use. I have to keep copying things off weekly to make this phone work for me. Anyone have some USB-related tips, by chance?
I get the same slowness, but not all the time. Yes its quite weird
Hmmm...that's strange. Coming from a GS3 the transfer speed on this is considerably fast, and I can even see imagine previews. (I never could before with MTP). I transferred about 2 GB in pictures and it took around 17 minutes
Sent from My Only "One"
My S3 and GN2 were lightning-fast compared to this phone. 2,000MB should transfer in about 80 seconds over USB 2.0. That's not even thinking about USB 3.0 at all.
I'm seeing highly variable speeds with my T-mobile variant. I'm on CM10 at the moment. Some times it's OK, some times it's so bad the computer thinks I've disconnected the device. Something is seriously wrong here but I don't know what can be done about it.
I also tried on my linux laptop, same symptoms.
Anyone NOT seeing this issue with an HTC One?
tamale said:
I'm seeing highly variable speeds with my T-mobile variant. I'm on CM10 at the moment. Some times it's OK, some times it's so bad the computer thinks I've disconnected the device. Something is seriously wrong here but I don't know what can be done about it.
I also tried on my linux laptop, same symptoms.
Anyone NOT seeing this issue with an HTC One?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had to transfer off my pictures/videos because I ran out of room, (32GB, thanks to Sprint...) it took a combined 15-20 hours to transfer about 20GB. Those transfer rates are garbage. I too, only have USB 3.0 ports.
That comes out to 0.38MB/s -- or 388KB/s -- pure crap. I am considering doing over WiFi instead.
No issues with my transfer speeds-- given how many times I've used fastboot to push large image files around lately, I can say it only took me about 10 to 20 minutes on a bad day to move a ~500MB file.
ScrapMaker said:
I take my photos in Zoe mode, and I filled up my storage the first weekend I owned this thing, with casual sightseeing camera use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fear no more. 4.2.2 saves only one picture and one video, but allows you to extract pictures from the video if you feel like it. (As opposed to the 21 files it saves right now)
Also, I use USB 2 (old computer) and I have no complaints.
sauprankul said:
Fear no more. 4.2.2 saves only one picture and one video, but allows you to extract pictures from the video if you feel like it. (As opposed to the 21 files it saves right now)
Also, I use USB 2 (old computer) and I have no complaints.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hopefully there is no difference in quality by scrubbing the video instead of saving the separate stills...
Some motherboards with usb 3.0 and win 8 do not jive well.
Rirere said:
No issues with my transfer speeds-- given how many times I've used fastboot to push large image files around lately, I can say it only took me about 10 to 20 minutes on a bad day to move a ~500MB file.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That comes out to 0.57MB/s, or 583KB/s. Also known as complete crap. Real-world USB 2.0 flash drive transfer rates are about 125MB/s, over 219 times faster than what you're getting here.
sauprankul said:
Fear no more. 4.2.2 saves only one picture and one video, but allows you to extract pictures from the video if you feel like it. (As opposed to the 21 files it saves right now)
Also, I use USB 2 (old computer) and I have no complaints.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't seen any Sense5/4.2.2 ROMs yet, have you?
benny3 said:
Some motherboards with usb 3.0 and win 8 do not jive well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be weird, (but still believable,) since my ultrabook came with Win8 64 and only USB 3.0 ports.
I just built a new PC with an Asus Sabertooth and i7 4770k. Didn't ever get the Intel brand USB 3.0 driver and through USB 3.0 I transferred 20 GB of music in under a half hour.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Teeeejay said:
I just built a new PC with an Asus Sabertooth and i7 4770k. Didn't ever get the Intel brand USB 3.0 driver and through USB 3.0 I transferred 20 GB of music in under a half hour.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm backing up my phone to wipe everything, and I'm seeing the same sort of 17-hour/6GB transfers. This is ridiculous...
I plugged in my phone to a USB port on my HTPC with USB 2.0 ports and copied the whole thing in 30 minutes. I don't get what's up with this phone and USB 3.0 ports. It was a PITA to root my phone as well...
33,5 GB of music took 2 hours to transfer through USB cable, that was connected to USB 3.0 connector, to 64 GB SanDisk with 30 MBps speed.
Question: What the hell?!
You can have GB of transfer rate on PC or cable but when the data reach the microSD slot of the Z1, they will stuck at maximum of 40mb/s of transfer rate with an average of 25/30mb/s as it is the maximum what you can get. At this point I will use FTP, very comfortable.
But I don't have even 20 MBps. And that's the problem. It's slow. Veeeeeery sloooooooow.
Terepin said:
But I don't have even 20 MBps. And that's the problem. It's slow. Veeeeeery sloooooooow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remember, much like your body, you're only as fast as your slowest part..
The device is writing to the SD card on your behalf through a software bridge.
Plug the SD card right into your PC if you want it faster.. eliminate the middleman (in this case, the phone)
Trying to look at pictures on computer (been taking lots of them with this camera)
accessing data is stupid slow and it doesn't make sense
phone unlocked with allow data transfer selected
oneplus charger to usb b port at front of case "equally as slow with usb c at back of motherboard" so I dont think the cable is the bottleneck
I feel like ive tried everything including enabling usb debugging (dont know why but I havent been into tech to the level of this amazing forum since I was young so forgive me if answer is obvious google was useless)
Thanks, D
thatoneguydownthestreet said:
Trying to look at pictures on computer (been taking lots of them with this camera)
accessing data is stupid slow and it doesn't make sense
phone unlocked with allow data transfer selected
oneplus charger to usb b port at front of case "equally as slow with usb c at back of motherboard" so I dont think the cable is the bottleneck
I feel like ive tried everything including enabling usb debugging (dont know why but I havent been into tech to the level of this amazing forum since I was young so forgive me if answer is obvious google was useless)
Thanks, D
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to clarify transfer is what to be expected but the loading of thumbnails and data amount or size. once youve loaded all of them its fast.
but it takes a few minutes sometimes.
phones generally have good SSDS so does my computer processors on the phone is good, I cant find the bottleneck, does every device do this???
Windows need to read all your photo, every time you connect the phone. And if you have many photos... it could take some minutes ...
For example my Lenovo Legion y540 with i7 gen9 12mb cache, 16gb ram dual chanel, SSD Samsung 980 Pro 256gb for Windows & Samsung 870 Evo 2 Tb for storage. In my case it takes a few minutes. 2, 3 -5 minuntes. Yes is annoying !
thatoneguydownthestreet said:
Trying to look at pictures on computer (been taking lots of them with this camera)
accessing data is stupid slow and it doesn't make sense
phone unlocked with allow data transfer selected
oneplus charger to usb b port at front of case "equally as slow with usb c at back of motherboard" so I dont think the cable is the bottleneck
I feel like ive tried everything including enabling usb debugging (dont know why but I havent been into tech to the level of this amazing forum since I was young so forgive me if answer is obvious google was useless)
Thanks, D
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you use the stock Oneplus red cable between the phone and the desktop, it most likely is a 2.0 spec C-type cable (most likely, at least the one that came with my 9 Pro is). Go buy a 3.1 C-type cable (nowadays USB 3.2 Gen 2) or 3.2 C-type cable (nowadays USB 3.2 Gen 2x2)
null0seven said:
Windows need to read all your photo, every time you connect the phone. And if you have many photos... it could take some minutes ...
For example my Lenovo Legion y540 with i7 gen9 12mb cache, 16gb ram dual chanel, SSD Samsung 980 Pro 256gb for Windows & Samsung 870 Evo 2 Tb for storage. In my case it takes a few minutes. 2, 3 -5 minuntes. Yes is annoying !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's annoying, I thought the point of a thumbnail was a low res picture for quick access. You'd think in 2022 we'd have a better way.
heartagramm said:
If you use the stock Oneplus red cable between the phone and the desktop, it most likely is a 2.0 spec C-type cable (most likely, at least the one that came with my 9 Pro is). Go buy a 3.1 C-type cable (nowadays USB 3.2 Gen 2) or 3.2 C-type cable (nowadays USB 3.2 Gen 2x2)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok so at 2.0 speeds 480 Mbps, suppose all pictures are 15 mb big and they're 1500 of them I'd take 48 seconds to see them all (high res no less)
(But they're not because you click on them and it takes an additional 7 ish seconds to load the image when opened. )
By this logic using a 3.0 cable (4800mbps) ( if ssd supports the speed) should only take about 5 seconds for all images
And it does not because I've used a c to c pixel cable to connect.
So they're must be a software bottleneck preventing a few things
The thumbnail should be small and in turn it should really take no longer than a couple seconds to load low res images ( unless these thumbnails don't exist on the phone and they have to be generated once the phone is plugged in)
It could also be a Windows issue (anyone have a mac that could try accessing their data through the file browser) just like the search feature in Windows takes ages and it's often so bad it can usually be faster finding the file manually it could be a matter of a broken or outdated protocol to read files off a device.
All I'm saying with all of these advertised speeds 5 minutes for 1000 5mb (yes not 15) and a couple big videos is too damn long. I'll be trying to see if there are any softwares out there that let you read of your device in a similar way itunes ( does itunes still exist??) does with apple devices
heartagramm said:
If you use the stock Oneplus red cable between the phone and the desktop, it most likely is a 2.0 spec C-type cable (most likely, at least the one that came with my 9 Pro is). Go buy a 3.1 C-type cable (nowadays USB 3.2 Gen 2) or 3.2 C-type cable (nowadays USB 3.2 Gen 2x2)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a usb3 10gbps cable and it still runs at slow speeds. I think that it's only USB 2.0 over type C
Maybe the 10 Pro has slower USB type C then, my 9 Pro is way faster with a 3.1 cable.
are using a usb 3 port on your computer?
i don't have any issues with transfer speeds.
I forgot to mention, my laptop have only usb 3.1 ports & 1 type C for charging.. & Windows 11 Pro x64.
Type C ports are produced in different versions, from 2.0 from 3.2.
Thumbnail are not the problem. I set my View with Details & select the newer first. Same amount of time. Still the green bar charge all hundreds of photos. Like i have a hdd from 20 years...