What are your benchmarks? I was reading the EVO gets like 55 on FPS2d, but I ran it once and got 60 with StdDev of 11. My quadrant was 114. And Linpack is 1.618 MFLOPS. I'm upgrading to EVOs today, so was just wanted to get a feel for how much of a difference I'd see which should be a lot, but I was really blow away by my FPS2D benchmark...
Related
Hello all,
I'm quite shocked when testing quadrant and I got 1774 score. Usually I only got around 1400-1500.
Then I tried that time, I had around 1400 for the first time, and I repeat the test directly and get 1774 score.
I repeat the method the next day and get also a huge difference between the first try and the second try.
anyone can explain this??
I'm running CM6 RC2
1113MHz monks kernel
pretty nice score, possibly some other proceses running in the background, i got a 1200+ score then killed a bunch of stuff running and then got a 1500 score
I usually hit 1700-ish.
disgustip8ted said:
pretty nice score, possibly some other proceses running in the background, i got a 1200+ score then killed a bunch of stuff running and then got a 1500 score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try again directly after you got 1500 score. I got 1700 for the second try
samsung galaxy s
I did the benchmark before applying the voodoo lagfix on my SGS, i was the third on the list just after moto droid x, after the lagfix and reboot, i'm now 1469 and on top of all the device, the original SGS score is way below...
the point is, how this thing work ? is this reliable ? i mean what's the point of the app finally ?
I honestly think that the score doesn't matter. Isn't the most important thing most aim for is speed and stability? If your phone feels fast then you shouldn't care for the score.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
1774marks? no it's not strange.
Here is a screenshot i have made about month ago on original-chinese-odexed Miui [email protected] without any hacks, it was fast as lighting (Or diarrhea)
Miui12.31 not so fast
What does this say about my phone
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
That you took the screenshot at 11:08 p.m.? Are we playing "I Spy"? ....I give up.
I just mean...
I saw a post and people are getting scores in the 20s and 30s and mine was 3.... is there something I can do to make my phone faster
Sent from my HTC Hero with Froyo...
Vandelay007 said:
I just mean...
I saw a post and people are getting scores in the 20s and 30s and mine was 3.... is there something I can do to make my phone faster
Sent from my HTC Hero with Froyo...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you are confusing FPS (Frames Per Second that Neocore gives you) with MFLOPS (Million Floating-Point Operations Per Second). Your Hero can get as high as maybe 5.4 MFLOPS, at least that is the fastest I have seen.
All of these are arbitrary measurements that probably mean very little. it is easy to get caught up in it. I run CM6 and consistently get 4.7 MFLOPS at the stock 691 overclocking. If you hero can tolerate faster processor speeds, it will go higher.
Here, read this.....http://bugclub.org/beginners/math/mflops.html
smolck said:
I think you are confusing FPS (Frames Per Second that Neocore gives you) with MFLOPS (Million Floating-Point Operations Per Second). Your Hero can get as high as maybe 5.4 MFLOPS, at least that is the fastest I have seen.
All of these are arbitrary measurements that probably mean very little. it is easy to get caught up in it. I run CM6 and consistently get 4.7 MFLOPS at the stock 691 overclocking. If you hero can tolerate faster processor speeds, it will go higher.
Here, read this.....http://bugclub.org/beginners/math/mflops.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cool.. very educational..... lol
I just got about 22 fps
Sent from my HTC Hero with Froyo...
Hi all.
I was running 2.1 Eclair just a few hours ago and was getting constant scores of 2.2K+ on Quadrant with the OCLF. I'm now running a rooted 2.2 Froyo with the same OCLF and scoring 1846. I can barely see a loss of performance... Does anyone know why this is?
Thanks in advance.
Because Quadrant is a SYNTHETIC BENCHMARK! It only tests a single specific workload
I was also under the impression that OCLF didn't work on Froyo unless you first ran the Z4 app and then the OCLF. I also agree though that Quadrant isn't that useful. The best test is whether you're happy with the speed of the phone. I'd be happy with it if it responds to my touch without a pause of a second or more.
Quadrant means nothing really, anyone can get 1k in there and outperform a 2.6k score.
Before you make comments I already searches.
Ok...so the other night I'm all bragging about my phone with some friends and had the idea that we should all run benchmarks to see who came up with the best score.
An EVO 4G running cyanogen, Nexus One on 2.2, and a stock T-Mobile G2 all scored in the 30s. My Captivate on Phoenix 2.5 scored 14...wtf? Why are our scores so low?
Posted from a phone
nooomoto said:
Before you make comments I already searches.
Ok...so the other night I'm all bragging about my phone with some friends and had the idea that we should all run benchmarks to see who came up with the best score.
An EVO 4G running cyanogen, Nexus One on 2.2, and a stock T-Mobile G2 all scored in the 30s. My Captivate on Phoenix 2.5 scored 14...wtf? Why are our scores so low?
Posted from a phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These benchmark tools are not optimized for our chipset. The score in the end doesn't matter except for each person to see if they have any increases. When comparing with other phones the true test would be speed of the phone which you would probably see the Captivate would perform very well.
Agreed about benchmarking...but if you need to feel better about it test them with neocore or nenamark, the graphics cripple the evo.
I have had both phones and gps aside, the sgs is far better imo.
Linpack performs better on Scorpion CPU's (Snapdragon) due to full JIT optimization. It is not a measure of actual performance.
Tell your friends exactly what GGX said, word for word.
Then have them test just as newter said.
Then tell them to shut up.
Sent from under your bed.
Will do. Thanks guys.
Posted from a phone
Has anyone tried SMARTBENCH 2010 or 2011 vs QUADRANT BENCHMARK? Does anyone besides me think it seems more realistic? Not to take anything away from the OC Kernels which definitely make the NC much quicker.
Just DL'd it, installed, and ran it right off the bat. I got an abysmal 473 and a 1543 on graphics. Seems way too low to be true, maybe it is realistic though. Still love my super high quadrants though
Edit: Just re-ran the test, and got a much better 1066 productivity, and 1368 games index. Seems reasonable to me! What scores did anyone else get on smartbench 2011??
Sent from my NookColor using Tapatalk