I'm using a Samsung Galaxy S and just upgrade to 2.2 Froyo. I'm just wonder a things that. Do you know why Samsung Galaxy S only displays that It has 304mb Ram. Samsung confirmed that Galaxy S has 512mb Ram. Why the phone displays too little ram like that.
When I use 2.1 Android. Galaxy S displayed 348mb Ram and now on 2.2 Android the number is 304mb.
Can you explain that for me?? Thanks all you guys alot.
512MB hardware, 208 system reserved , 304 user/application usable.
IMHO, 208 system reserve is quite large.. with 2.1 i never had a chance to see 348mb ram XD
i noticed that too. awaiting someones response
208 system reserved, so we can't change this. 304 is not enough in some case.
Well try to read all 100 tread about this.
So far i don't se the problem. I never run out of memory.
My phone is fast and don't lag.
Sent from GT-I9000 Jpm OS kernel with z4mod
DamianGto said:
Well try to read all 100 tread about this.
So far i don't se the problem. I never run out of memory.
My phone is fast and don't lag.
Sent from GT-I9000 Jpm OS kernel with z4mod
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lucky you with your lovely SGS
Oletros said:
Lucky you with your lovely SGS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you know what you are doing its not hard.
If you don't it vary easy to read in the forum and learn about all things.
The main reason people has problem and write this kind of tread is they are so lazy to read that's already in the forum.
Sent from GT-I9000 Jpm OS kernel with z4mod
200 mb reserved for what? video playback? screen transitions?
Here we go again....
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
yeah, here we go...
On my previous HTC Desire had 512 Ram w/o external RAM, so I had to install all apps onto internal RAM... After 10-12 app installed, I had 32MB free space, and it was enough. (ok after froyo I could use the app2sd too) - yeah it was very miserable
DamianGto said:
If you know what you are doing its not hard.
If you don't it vary easy to read in the forum and learn about all things.
The main reason people has problem and write this kind of tread is they are so lazy to read that's already in the forum.
Sent from GT-I9000 Jpm OS kernel with z4mod
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Another answer which blames on the user.
Sorry, SGS 2.2 doesnt' have so much free memory available. And compared with other smartphones you can't do the same things withouth Android starting to kill background processes.
Oletros said:
Another answer which blames on the user.
Sorry, SGS 2.2 doesnt' have so much free memory available. And compared with other smartphones you can't do the same things withouth Android starting to kill background processes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well its true about the user fault.
Why do you need to run so much background program?
The main problem is that people thinks it is a computer with alot of memory. Well its not.
If you don't like it then sell it and buy a phone with more free ram.
Even how much people complain here it don't change anything.
Sent from GT-I9000 Jpm OS kernel with z4mod
Hi,
Now you're speaking about SGS ram... Does anybody knows if its PowerVr SGX540 has dedicated ram as Snapdragon's chipset has?
Adreno 200, being a worse performer, has 64 mb of dedicated video mem.
Cheers!
DamianGto said:
Well its true about the user fault.
Why do you need to run so much background program?
The main problem is that people thinks it is a computer with alot of memory. Well its not.
If you don't like it then sell it and buy a phone with more free ram.
Even how much people complain here it don't change anything.
Sent from GT-I9000 Jpm OS kernel with z4mod
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The main problem is people expects that this phone will work as advertised. And if Samsung sells it sying that it has 512MB of RAM I will want to work like other phones which have 512MB of RAM, not like a phone which have 292MB of RAM.
And yes, you don't change anything, it seems that you have an exceptional SGS which doesn't lags, doesn't have low memory problems, GPS works like a charm. If someone whines about GPS, memory, lag is always fault of the user, not the phone.
And then we will laugh at Apple fanboys when we have a lot of Samsung fanboys here
Oletros said:
The main problem is people expects that this phone will work as advertised. And if Samsung sells it sying that it has 512MB of RAM I will want to work like other phones which have 512MB of RAM, not like a phone which have 292MB of RAM.
And yes, you don't change anything, it seems that you have an exceptional SGS which doesn't lags, doesn't have low memory problems, GPS works like a charm. If someone whines about GPS, memory, lag is always fault of the user, not the phone.
And then we will laugh at Apple fanboys when we have a lot of Samsung fanboys here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Show me where Samsung say it has 512MB ram that user can use?
The fact is that sgs do has 512MB ram.
And none of the smartphone has all ram free for the user.
That's one problem also that people don't read and understand how things work.
Im NOT a Samsung fanboy.
But i know what i did buy and i know how to fix things.
I also have iphone to compare this sgs with.
But many people are to lazy to read information and learn about things.
They buy this phone and only read some advertising for it and THINK they know about it.
80% of the people that's has bought this phone and complain should not bought it. Its not the right phone for them.
My girlfriend did buy a sgs to.
She did compare this phone and the iphone. It was a easy choice for her. But if she did not have the 2 phones and could compare them and have me to ask and have me to modifies the phone i guess she would choose the iphone. Just for she had heard much about it.
Sent from GT-I9000 Jpm OS kernel with z4mod
@DamianGto, i don't know if you are a samsung fanboy, really, i don't care, but sure you behave like one of them. you are everywhere, like your counterpart oletros, bashing people, never being constructive. you are not a knight, galaxy s is an object, not your princess...and yes, like any other smartphone it has problems. yeah, i know, don't be upset, your galaxy s is just perfect, i was talking about others sgs
it's not a phone, it's a smartphone...i think sgs is too much for you, you don't need it to make phone calls, you'll be fine with a 30 euros phone...then you can tell people "it's just a phone!"
just a question...why do you still have your iphone? why don' you sell it and buy another super-amazing sgs? you can buy two sgs with an iphone, what are you waiting for??
@oletros, come on, you behave like my grandfather, always talking about how good was staying in germany and how bad italy was...everytime he was whining about my country for about 40 years. he died here, never moved to germany. it's not your worst enemy, you bought it, you can sell it...and guess what? there are people who will buy it it's not bound to you, it's not like an arm, you can get rid of it if you really want...but! if you don't want to...please stop with all this anger (toward sgs), you'll live better if you start searching for solutions instead of wasting your energy (and your mental health) on whining...everybody knows sgs problems, there is no need to repeat them.
peace guys!
It's true that i write alot.
I know i bash at people sometimes but its only when they repeat same things over and over. You can easy get the answer on that if they read in the forum.
I only got the iphone to play games on. Android don't have much games that good.
That's bad for sgs is alot better in the hardware then iphone.
Its also true i don't use it so much for phone calls.
I do use it like a mini computer.
I can't say i did like my sgs so much when i did bought it. But after flashing it and tweaking the phone it has been very good.
I also know i have a very good sgs that all things works on.
The gps is almost flawless.
So yes i do like my sgs. But after all thing i have done with it.
The same things all person can do if they read the forums.
The main different between me and many people is that if i got a problem i seek a solution on that. I don't whining in tread after tread about the problem.
You don't learn anything if you whining and don't seek solution on problem you got.
Sent from GT-I9000 Jpm OS kernel with z4mod
Ok. Here JP6 Froyo with voodoo lag fix.
DamianGto
- please tell me a solution that fixes the lag in touch wiz application drawer (ca be seen if you have 5-6 pages of apps and slide fast, or pinch to zoom out)
- please provide a solution for fixing the swype lagging input.
- please provide a solution for an efficient memory&cpu wise browser.
If your soulutions is "replace the apps", than no thank you.
Now back on the subject, the available RAM is a real issue. People who browse a lot can observe this. Even a single page (such as pocketnow.com desktop version or any other a little heave website) can make the browser eat so much RAM (more than 140MB) and CPU that makes the phone unstable. How many times my opened apps were closed (even launcher,etc) . Or how many times my browser closed itself as a) foreground application; b) when opening another app such as music player.
So DamianGto please don't make it feel as it's not a real issue. This it is. It ruins the joy of multitasking. You cannot have Skype, or Messenger opened while browsing cos' you get the risk the apps to be vanished because of the free memory
So Samsungs' Froyo is a piece of sh*t that ruins the joy of using the phone.
The RAM is not an issue for people that are using the phone as a media player or for phone calls.
spyrale said:
@oletros, come on, you behave like my grandfather, always talking about how good was staying in germany and how bad italy was...everytime he was whining about my country for about 40 years. he died here, never moved to germany. it's not your worst enemy, you bought it, you can sell it...and guess what? there are people who will buy it it's not bound to you, it's not like an arm, you can get rid of it if you really want...but! if you don't want to...please stop with all this anger (toward sgs), you'll live better if you start searching for solutions instead of wasting your energy (and your mental health) on whining...everybody knows sgs problems, there is no need to repeat them.
peace guys!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I'm not against SGS, I'm tired of people saying that it's perfect and the one to blame is the user.
Ma credo che scriverò un po meno, è meglio per me
DSF said:
Ok. Here JP6 Froyo with voodoo lag fix.
DamianGto
- please tell me a solution that fixes the lag in touch wiz application drawer (ca be seen if you have 5-6 pages of apps and slide fast, or pinch to zoom out)
- please provide a solution for fixing the swype lagging input.
- please provide a solution for an efficient memory&cpu wise browser.
If your soulutions is "replace the apps", than no thank you.
Now back on the subject, the available RAM is a real issue. People who browse a lot can observe this. Even a single page (such as pocketnow.com desktop version or any other a little heave website) can make the browser eat so much RAM (more than 140MB) and CPU that makes the phone unstable. How many times my opened apps were closed (even launcher,etc) . Or how many times my browser closed itself as a) foreground application; b) when opening another app such as music player.
So DamianGto please don't make it feel as it's not a real issue. This it is. It ruins the joy of multitasking. You cannot have Skype, or Messenger opened while browsing cos' you get the risk the apps to be vanished because of the free memory
So Samsungs' Froyo is a piece of sh*t that ruins the joy of using the phone.
The RAM is not an issue for people that are using the phone as a media player or for phone calls.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is sadly true...i flashed voodoo doctor rom 2.1 with advanced ext4 lagfix, using launcherpro plus instead of touchwiz...rom is smooth and i have no lag (120 apps), but with 80-100 mb of free ram when i open browser launcherpro get restarted everytime for the lack of free ram (didn't have this problem with jm8), this is more than annoying. and yes, i use autostarts to disable all unnecessary startup programs, even uninstalled autokiller (useles IMHO), reduced homescreen pages from 7 to 5 and removed all widgets that i use less in order to have more free ram. this is so sad for a monster phone like galaxy s...let's hope that devs or samsung find a way to optimize ram management. anyway, there is a ref thread where some smart guys are playing with ram allocation inside kernel...eventually something will come out to fix this **** i am optimistic on this subject, i would have been more worried if the amount of usable ram was the same between eclair and froyo rom. i hope this mean that capable people can play with ram pre-settings to free up more ram without side-effects. i had ram problems with samsung omnia 3 years ago, when i bought htc hd2 i thought i'd never had lack of ram anymore
sorry for my english!
Related
i thought the cappy had 512 mb of ram... why do all the roms have like 341? im confused >.< either i looked at 3 faulty spec sheets for the captivate or we arent utilizing the full ram potential for the captivate. would someone explain the truth on this matter to a captivate noob like me?
i could be wrong but i believe the 341 is available to use ram, while the rest is being used by the phone to function.
nehal51086 said:
i could be wrong but i believe the 341 is available to use ram, while the rest is being used by the phone to function.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that would make sense, but that makes the specs misleading... i traded my HD2 for a cappy because the spec sheet said 512mb of ram and the HD2 only has 411 available to the OS when running android from nand because the rest is dedicated to winmo only (which sucks massively), and i wanted more ram lol, guess i should have looked harder into things, but regardless the captivate is "better" in very many areas, but RAM is literally my deciding factor for so many things lately (like t-mobile with the sensation or sprint with the evo 3d, i would say evo 3d because it has 256mb or so more ram)
This question has been asked and answered several times....
the phone does have 512mb of ram. Like the person above me said the phones os and graphics take up a portion of the ram. All computers and smart phones work the same way.
As a side note android handles ram very well. You don't need to manage it at all by freeing it up. free ram is wasted ram as the os will have to load it back up anyways
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
crystalhand said:
This question has been asked and answered several times....
the phone does have 512mb of ram. Like the person above me said the phones os and graphics take up a portion of the ram. All computers and smart phones work the same way.
As a side note android handles ram very well. You don't need to manage it at all by freeing it up. free ram is wasted ram as the os will have to load it back up anyways
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know this very well, free ram can be considered wasted ram, unless you need 200mb or so free for a tegra class game, but i think android handles ram awesomely to an extent but can be improved by implementing autokiller memory optimizer in a knowledgable and appropriate way that doesnt hurt optimizations android already has in place, zipaligning, increasing the dalvik heap size, etc... can all be done, im not asking about how android handles ram or anything, and im sorry i didnt know the question had been asked several times i am brand new to the captivate today, literally, and was doing not but seeking information i didnt understand or know, thank you for the explaination though i appreciate it, and im glad to know that my new captivate will utilize the left over 171mb of ram for something unlike my HD2 that couldnt access the last 100mb because it was designated to winmo only. i had an idea that was the case and i was just clarifying to myself because i kept reading rom changelogs stating "enabled more ram now 341mb available" or something along the lines of that and thought to myself "there should be more available already" lol
I honestly think 341MB is enough.
341 MB is alot. But something is taking all that up too. On a fresh boot, half of it is used, and I have 140~170 MB. Its even worse on GB. Most ive gotten is 100 MB free.
So if the half of the 341 plus the mysterious 171 MB that is nowhere to be found, I dont get whats using the other 171 that is not part of the 341. Lol confusing
Same happens to me. Who knows, lol
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
I think its the user interface graphics, like scrolling quality is good because that ram is dedicated to things
like that
Sent from cyanogen mod 7
Today, a friend, called me to setup a new android phone for his wife. It was the cheap, very cheap, Alcatel Onetouch 908.
I transfered contacts, calendar events, configured emails and installed some apps from the market. The phone felt speedy, to be exact much more speedy than my Galaxy S and that started to bother me. What bothered me more was my friend, who has a Galaxy S II device. He told me out of the blue that alcatel felt speedier than his S II. I finished and 'take it for a walk'. I started sequently loading apps (browser, gmail, contants, market and talk) and then multitasked between them. The initial loading was almost immediate and, to my suprise, mutitasking was instant. My Galaxy felt like a second class device, my world shuttered... almost
I left my friend and I was angry, very angry. How could that be? I've tried numerous roms, customs and stock ones, with lagfixes enabled or disabled but, truth to be told, all of them felt like rubbish compared to an alcatel onet... I don't want to tell the evil's name!
Now, I am still angry but not with Alcatel,.. with Samsung! Am I wrong? What are your thoughts? Does anyone have an answer? Was just my imagination?
I don't suppose you have tried running 3D games on it?
knowledge is Power. Guard it well.
I did and it was fantastic... just kidding
No I didn't. But now you've said it, just for the laughs, next time I will be around, I'll try angry birds... if possible (although not a 3D game... I think)!
Ugliest thing ever seen on Internet
aaaaaaaaawwwwwwww, this is uglyyyyy, what an ugly phone, even if it had the speed of light, or even faster, the speed of thought or even much faster than those the speed of GOD, I would take the SGS anytime.
btw, try quadrant too, see if you get some noticable scores with it, if it's really worth your time, but if it was me, I wouldn't even set it up for a girl friend, let alone a friends girl.
well its the same story again u see a new android phone unused or if even used then used very very lightly(just calls,sms,have 10-25 apps. and all that) ! man any android pgone newly bought and used lightly can be very fast! i saw my friends galaxy ace on 2.2 bpught just 3 days ago and very lightly uaed and it was working like a lightning! if you want to see your phone this fast then flash stock jvs and you'll face lightning but as soon you get some apps in and start using it heavily youll start facing lags! download 100 apps. and do heavy multitasking on that alcatel for a week or so and youll start hating it and will throw it into a dustbin!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
You should try CyanogenMod 7 (CM7) out of the box (no apps/games installed).
It's just fast - the speed is nearly amazing. Same thing with MIUI.
And just forget stock-ROMs. You won't want to use them after you have tried an AOSP-ROM (CM7 or MIUI).
Lunchbox115 said:
You should try CyanogenMod 7 (CM7) out of the box (no apps/games installed).
It's just fast - the speed is nearly amazing. Same thing with MIUI.
And just forget stock-ROMs. You won't want to use them after you have tried an AOSP-ROM (CM7 or MIUI).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not like that exactly but its very true both cm7 and minuit out of the box are amazing infraction I just installed 1.9.16 miui and it has just 7 apps. Installed and it's balzing fast ! But minuit has many problems of its own so I am moving back to Samsung based rom jetpack v5 spark very soon !
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Thanks for the replies...
-I've tried CM7: it was fast but... it didn't felt home. So I dished it and went back to the samsung related rom's!
-Yes, SGS is prettier than 908 but really it's not so ugly. After all, my post was about speed, not beauty.
-So, if I load alcatel with 100+ apps I will feel the pain you say. We'll see... But if it's true then I will be angry again, very angry... with Google!
Memory Management
The thing about multitasking is that is related mainly with memory and memory management. I think it's true, if enough free memory exists any os will keep more tasks active and multitask between them will be instant...
But android keeps loading and unloading apps, in the background, which I almost never use but consume memory.
Skype is the perfect example. When i do not need it, I am signing off skype and go straight back to my home screen... Of course, as we all know, skype persists and never exits. It's just sits there consuming memory and doing nothing. If I try to kill it, android will happily and immediately reload it. The only way really kill it, is to uninstall it, but is this a solution?
One more example? The facebook app or the friencaster app. Even if I disable every automatic refresh or log off from facebook some part of them will keep running and like skype I cannot kill it.
The essence of all this is that: I own a phone with 512 mb of ram assisted with a powerful, 1 GHz, CPU, much - much more than an alcatel OT 908 and this doesn't show. Maybe is the 100+ apps I've installed in my phone, maybe is android, maybe is a bug, maybe it's me whining. Whatever is it... it's wrong and yes, I'm starting feeling angry, very angry with... Google and Samsung
milro1970 said:
The thing about multitasking is that is related mainly with memory and memory management. I think it's true, if enough free memory exists any os will keep more tasks active and multitask between them will be instant...
But android keeps loading and unloading apps, in the background, which I almost never use but consume memory.
Skype is the perfect example. When i do not need it, I am signing off skype and go straight back to my home screen... Of course, as we all know, skype persists and never exits. It's just sits there consuming memory and doing nothing. If I try to kill it, android will happily and immediately reload it. The only way really kill it, is to uninstall it, but is this a solution?
One more example? The facebook app or the friencaster app. Even if I disable every automatic refresh or log off from facebook some part of them will keep running and like skype I cannot kill it.
The essence of all this is that: I own a phone with 512 mb of ram assisted with a powerful, 1 GHz, CPU, much - much more than an alcatel OT 908 and this doesn't show. Maybe is the 100+ apps I've installed in my phone, maybe is android, maybe is a bug, maybe it's me whining. Whatever is it... it's wrong and yes, I'm starting feeling angry, very angry with... Google and Samsung
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Assuming your phone is rooted there are apps that can disable or prevent other apps from starting and running in the background- android optimize and autostarts seem to work for me.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Looking at the specs for the OneTouch, I am not surprised it is fast.
The 600mhz chip it is using is quite overpowered for what is effectively a featurephone. It is also supporting a much smaller, less advanced screen (256K colors, TFT) which frees up a LOT of cpu cycles for basic functions. This kind of speed while just being a phone is why feature phones aren't as dead as people keep assuming.
It is also running Froyo, which was made for this kind of phone and likely races on it, without having to worry about the sort of strains a Galaxy class smartphone puts on an OS.
Remember, if you install a slimmed down OS on a custom designed modern laptop, and ONLY install a handful of programs no doubt it will break speed records. However, to judge it against a fully loaded, professional install is like comparing apples and oranges.
milro1970 said:
I did and it was fantastic... just kidding
No I didn't. But now you've said it, just for the laughs, next time I will be around, I'll try angry birds... if possible (although not a 3D game... I think)!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
alcatel ot 908 runs NFS shift, NOVA, Gangstar, BIA2, Sandstorm, Sims3, Rackless Racing, GuerillaBob, dead space....runs 99% hd games that don't requires armv7 or 2.3
it's way better then most off QVGA android and all msm7201 and msm7225.... (hvga and qvga)
for that money...
Well I have to say.
Just bought this second hand SGS to test and compare with my Desire HD.
If I can be honest. Both have the same clock freq and specs seems the same, but the DHD (lets call it that way) is alot faster than the SGS.
I am amazed how long it takes to just open the camera. On the DHD the camera app opens in half a second I think.
Then sometimes you click on something and nothing happens making you think that you didn't click anything at all. On the DHD opening anything is instant.
I'm running Darky 10.22 so if someone knows if I need to change something to make this a faster thing please let me know.
the only advantage of the desire hd and the alcatel ot 908 (i own one of these and a desire S, very similar to the hd hardware-wise) is that out-o-the-box, they're configured almost perfectly for their respective OS version and hardware.. Samsung makes some very tough and cutting-edge hardware, but they've always been lagging behind software-wise (and still are to some extent, i know what i'm talking about here too : my main device is a note2 N7100 and my dev/test device is my old -but almost unbreakable even when I'm the one who opens it up to solder or repair sthg in it- galaxy s2 i9100... None of those were left "stock", they're both fitted with CM10-derivated ROMs (most of the time a ParanoidAndroid or some derivate), heavily customized and "after-market" optimized (thanks to all the good tips&tweaks found here at XDA ^^) just to remedy those problems.. Never for my life would I leave one of these stock (I run a stock firmware on a dual-boot on the SGS2, but that's only for entering USSD codes, as these usually won't work on CM7/9/10 ROMs)... And yet, they're both way better when they're still "stock" than the Wave 1 was, with his powerful 1GHz Snapdragon CPU, but a puny 512Mb RAM -shared with the OS/CPU and GPU at that, leaving a mere 312Mb -give or take- to the poor user.. Far too low for its memory-hungry Bada OS,even in its latest and last 2.X versions.. I couldn't even open a second page in its Dolphin browser before it started shutting down background apps and closing widgets.. :s).
---------- Post added at 01:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:46 AM ----------
milro1970 said:
Thanks for the replies...
-I've tried CM7: it was fast but... it didn't felt home. So I dished it and went back to the samsung related rom's!
-Yes, SGS is prettier than 908 but really it's not so ugly. After all, my post was about speed, not beauty.
-So, if I load alcatel with 100+ apps I will feel the pain you say. We'll see... But if it's true then I will be angry again, very angry... with Google!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you won't be able to load that many apps on it m8... ^^
even with a big-ass 32Gb SD card, its /system and /data partitions are way too tiny for this number.. trust me, I've tried it, it choked at 20-30 tops for "average" apps (between 1 and 4Mb each)...
People have been saying that the Galaxy S actually come close to be an iPhone killer. Or it already has that I'm not sure of. But after using the SGS for almost a year now, I do feel that it is slow. Much much slower than iPhones.
However, it is okay if they aren't many apps. Everytime my SGS slows down, I would resort to factory reset and it would be okay until I start spamming downloads again.
This is totally contradictory to the iPhone. The lags I experience isn't major though. But it is annoying for sure and comparing to iPhones, I always feel like my phone is somehow underpowered. Anyone has the same experience? By the way, I'm using stock 2.3.4 JVQ.
You are right and wrong.
Sgs is not slow.
Based on your descrioption it appears that your problem only apears after you have installed lot of apps. I would bet this is because a lot of these apps have services running and auto load at startup.
The android platform's implementation of true multitasking does inherently introduce issues like lags when when critical resources like memory is depleted. Sgs only has 512mb ram. So when lots of services run in the background, it slows down and although it tries to free up ram, it can overwhelmed when all those apps tries to restart itself.
Task killers / autostarts app / kernel and tunings can only do so much based on my experience.
Best option is to be more selective with app download and what you really want to keep on the phone.
IPhone doesn't have true multitasking thus don't havr the same issue and appears faster. Of course the UI is GPU accelerated which helps.
So really depends how much you yourself multitask at then of the day and whether you need it. Many don't and thus find iPhone ideal.
Ice cream sandwich will bring gpu acceleration mainstream to android.
Still loving my sgs. I have an ipad2 which I also love but squirm when I wanted it to multitask.
My 2 cents sharing
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
^ +1
I started answering OP's question, but I it's pretty much the same thing you said...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
ccrows said:
^ +1
I started answering OP's question, but I it's pretty much the same thing you said...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL same here
Personal opinion - I enjoy customizing the phone, flashing and changing things, right now I'm on MIUI Mint Berry Edition 1.10.28 and it's fast, behaves very well and I really can´t complain.
If you don't like customizing and "owning" your phone, that way I believe you would prefer the Iphone because in terms of sock stuff it behaves very well.
Those are different phones, people have different taste you have pros and cons on both sides
vash_stanped said:
Personal opinion - I enjoy customizing the phone, flashing and changing things, right now I'm on MIUI Mint Berry Edition 1.10.28 and it's fast, behaves very well and I really can´t complain.
If you don't like customizing and "owning" your phone, that way I believe you would prefer the Iphone because in terms of sock stuff it behaves very well.
Those are different phones, people have different taste you have pros and cons on both sides
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This man knows his stuff.
Apple clock their processors very high but Samsung don't. That's why many people report their iPod touch or their iPhone getting very hot and then starts smoking. I read on a tech site nearly 10 months ago that a Guy bought a iPod touch and some days later while listening music it started smoking then he went to apple store aand they gave him a new one , this happened to that Guy 4 Times and he got a new i pod touch everytime and had loose his data again and again everytime they gave him a new one. You can call that Guy unlucky but still it happened to him, so apple just wants to get the best out of their devices even though they start burning and you can cook food on them. I use doctorz rom and haven't faced even a single lag on the latest v8.1
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
BHuvan goyal said:
Apple clock their processors very high but Samsung don't. That's why many people report their iPod touch or their iPhone getting very hot and then starts smoking. I read on a tech site nearly 10 months ago that a Guy bought a iPod touch and some days later while listening music it started smoking then he went to apple store aand they gave him a new one , this happened to that Guy 4 Times and he got a new i pod touch everytime and had loose his data again and again everytime they gave him a new one. You can call that Guy unlucky but still it happened to him, so apple just wants to get the best out of their devices even though they start burning and you can cook food on them. I use doctorz rom and haven't faced even a single lag on the latest v8.1
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whoa.
I'm pretty sure Apple underclocks more than overclocks the majority of their devices. I read that the iPhone 4S, for example, was underclocked to 800MHz (from 1000MHz, I'm assuming).
I don't think so it maybe different for iPhone 4s. As its dual core also has more ram.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
BHuvan goyal said:
I don't think so it maybe different for iPhone 4s. As its dual core also has more ram.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if Wikipedia is a good enough source for you, but it says so right under the Wikipedia article for Underclocking.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underclocking
"Most smartphones and PDAs, such as the Motorola Droid, Palm Pre, and Apple iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4 and iPhone 4s, use the "underclocking" of a more powerful processor, rather than the full clocking of a less powerful processor, to maximize battery life. The designers for such mobile devices often discover that a slower processor gives worse battery life than a more powerful processor at a lower clock rate. They select a processor on the basis of the performance per watt of the processor."
I'm sure you could find more credible sources if you googled it.
smiles.smiley said:
People have been saying that the Galaxy S actually come close to be an iPhone killer. Or it already has that I'm not sure of. But after using the SGS for almost a year now, I do feel that it is slow. Much much slower than iPhones.
However, it is okay if they aren't many apps. Everytime my SGS slows down, I would resort to factory reset and it would be okay until I start spamming downloads again.
This is totally contradictory to the iPhone. The lags I experience isn't major though. But it is annoying for sure and comparing to iPhones, I always feel like my phone is somehow underpowered. Anyone has the same experience? By the way, I'm using stock 2.3.4 JVQ.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want smoothness and no lag, just flash froyo 2.2.1.
disclaimernotice said:
If you want smoothness and no lag, just flash froyo 2.2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I keep hearing this and i want to try it for myself which froyo rom would you recommend?
I heard that a lot too. But I have friends running on 2.2.1 asked me to help them to get their device to 2.3.3/2.3.4. The reason they gave me was that their phones are much laggier than mine.
Hey Guys ... Did you look to the Ram status in the Galaxy Note ???
I have 600+/800 usage in normal situations !!! and when I clear ram it reached to 400+ which goes back to more than 600 Mb after moderate usage !!! what about in your Notes guys ??? Any solution for this ?? plz comments ....
What is it you are planning on doing with the free ram? Has the use of ram caused any problems? Don't worry about it and use the device. There is no point in trying to worry about something which is being used or not being used which is not affecting you in any way. Until it does have fun with the phone.
Do you think Android is running on air? The Note has 1GB RAM which the OS takes 200MB at boot. The rest is used by apps and other things. If you're not going to use the RAM, then why do you need it?
"My computer uses 50MB of RAM, And i have 32GB of it!" WHAT'S THE POINT?!
Try RAM Manager by Juwe. Be aware that the more memory you free up the worse multitasking will be.
Are you kidding me? Use RAM Manager when your device has 1GB of it? Please slap me as hard as you can.
This thread needs to be deleted.
RAM is there to be used.
I would use 100% of my RAM 100% of the time if I could. If it's not being used, it's being wasted.
Unused RAM is totally wasted. When 2GB devices come out OMG my device is using 1GB out of my 2GB!!!
To each his own, who are you to tell others what to do with their RAM? I'm not your typical "as much free memory as possible freak" but how comes that when I kill some apps before running something more intensive it's usually smoother and performs better?
pjm77 said:
To each his own, who are you to tell others what to do with their RAM? I'm not your typical "as much free memory as possible freak" but how comes that when I kill some apps before running something more intensive it's usually smoother and performs better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never had to manually kill apps with my G-Note, so I dont know what your doing wrong, Could be a faulty device as far as I can tell.
Thanks for your advice, I'm running to get it replaced.
pjm77 said:
Thanks for your advice, I'm running to get it replaced.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
600mb usage is totally normal on moderate use. Obviously you don't know how RAM Management work on Android. Go and replace your phone but nothing will change.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Would you replace your computer because it's using to much RAM?
Chances are you would find the RAM hog and keep it from starting up when not neccesary.
600mb is normal usage.... if you are not happy with that high of usage delete the apps that have services running or are always in the background. Android does this for you as you approach full RAM usage anyways though...
garytube said:
600mb usage is totally normal on moderate use. Obviously you don't know how RAM Management work on Android. Go and replace your phone but nothing will change.
Ever heard of irony?
Of course I'm not gonna get it replaced I'm happy with the way it is.
Yes, I've read about Android memory management quite a while ago. Very smart and very convincing. Now on the other hand - every now and then after some intense moments - let's say I'm driving and I'm using offline satnav then online satnav then there is a phonecall, then I make a voice note, I get out, send a text, use my GTD app and whatever else - after hours of such use when I get home, stretch my legs and I fancy to play let's say Galaxy on Fire 2, I find it smoother and less likely to crash if I just press "kill all apps" button in Task Manager. And since I installed RAM Manager I don't have to do it. And I haven't noticed any side effects that would interfere with my style of using my phone.
So guess what - I really don't give a **** about Android memory management and all expert opinions because I know what works for me and I'm happy with that state of things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pjm77 said:
garytube said:
600mb usage is totally normal on moderate use. Obviously you don't know how RAM Management work on Android. Go and replace your phone but nothing will change.
Ever heard of irony?
Of course I'm not gonna get it replaced I'm happy with the way it is.
Yes, I've read about Android memory management quite a while ago. Very smart and very convincing. Now on the other hand - every now and then after some intense moments - let's say I'm driving and I'm using offline satnav then online satnav then there is a phonecall, then I make a voice note, I get out, send a text, use my GTD app and whatever else - after hours of such use when I get home, stretch my legs and I fancy to play let's say Galaxy on Fire 2, I find it smoother and less likely to crash if I just press "kill all apps" button in Task Manager. And since I installed RAM Manager I don't have to do it. And I haven't noticed any side effects that would interfere with my style of using my phone.
So guess what - I really don't give a **** about Android memory management and all expert opinions because I know what works for me and I'm happy with that state of things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I liked your response, but it's not irony, it's sarcasm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pjm77 said:
garytube said:
600mb usage is totally normal on moderate use. Obviously you don't know how RAM Management work on Android. Go and replace your phone but nothing will change.
Ever heard of irony?
Of course I'm not gonna get it replaced I'm happy with the way it is.
Yes, I've read about Android memory management quite a while ago. Very smart and very convincing. Now on the other hand - every now and then after some intense moments - let's say I'm driving and I'm using offline satnav then online satnav then there is a phonecall, then I make a voice note, I get out, send a text, use my GTD app and whatever else - after hours of such use when I get home, stretch my legs and I fancy to play let's say Galaxy on Fire 2, I find it smoother and less likely to crash if I just press "kill all apps" button in Task Manager. And since I installed RAM Manager I don't have to do it. And I haven't noticed any side effects that would interfere with my style of using my phone.
So guess what - I really don't give a **** about Android memory management and all expert opinions because I know what works for me and I'm happy with that state of things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it looks like to me that you posted in this thread just to promote RAM Manager
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TeeeJaay said:
pjm77 said:
it looks like to me that you posted in this thread just to promote RAM Manager
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted in this thread beacuse another user complained about the problem that I came across and found solution to. It's certainly not the best one, but it's the one that works for me.
In the meantime I got ridiculed by more social-oriented users who need to accept and be accepted. To which I got upset and posted some crap. As a result I hijacked the thread. I apologize and shut up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LordManhattan said:
Are you kidding me? Use RAM Manager when your device has 1GB of it? Please slap me as hard as you can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung makes us fool it has only 800MB RAM. Even i thought it was 1GB.
It has 1GB. 200MB is reserved for the system.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Memory usage
My daughter started a game where a photo is used in the programme, and I got the message "Free RAM low, resolution of photo reduced". Had to kill running services to be able to run it without the reduced resolution. Checked the overall Galaxy Note ram usage and just out of the box I have around 230mb free of RAM, I have an HTC Desire HD (768 ram) that has the same free and it is filled with running apps. When you get that kind of messages from a new phone, from some ****ty simple kid programme before I have even filled it up with stuff I get really annoyed. When I kill all I can i can get max up to 400mb.
Yup, TouchWiz is a greedy RAM eating whore. Wait for CM9 and then you'll see why custom UIs like TouchWiz and Sense is bull****.
Sent from my iPad GT-N7000 using xda premium
Hey guys, I know its kind of a stupid thing to start a thread on so just spear with me
In 2009 I had an iPhone 3GS. Its was the latest iPhone in 2009 and was super fast. No lags on opening apps, closing apps, multitasking, scrolling screen and stuff like that. It was 99% LAGFREE. Games worked wonderful. I'm a big fan of hacking, so I jailbroke the iPhone and it still remained smooth and fast. For those who don't know, iPhone 3GS has a 779mhz CPU (apple clocked it down to 600mhz to prevent battery drains and other instabilities) and only 256mb ram. Now I have an international version of galaxy S that is clocked to 1.3 GHZ that has a 512 MB of RAM and believe me its slower than the iPhone. I just want to know what is wrong with our phones? Does apple use some magic superpowers on their devices? Opening apps lags, closing apps lags the home screen scrolling for some time, there are frequent crashing due to low RAM, there's lags in browser :S the music player lacks things as filtering of files, it has a worse reception than the iPhone 3gs. GPS is not goood. Even typing is sometimes laggy... the new jellybean made it a lil more like an iPhone due to its 60hz refresh rate and triple buffering but it still lags. Can you guys give me your opinions on this and stuff? Again I'm not trying to complain, I'm just wondering how could this be possible.
Sent from my GT-I9000
Didn't you ask the same question in general section?
dark_knight35 said:
Didn't you ask the same question in general section?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I did. Is that bad?
Sent from my GT-I9000
Helloworld294 said:
Yes I did. Is that bad?
Sent from my GT-I9000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Asking one time is absolutely enough. We could stop posting in here, your other thread already got some responses.
dark_knight35 said:
Asking one time is absolutely enough. We could stop posting in here, your other thread already got some responses.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't know, my bad.
Sent from my GT-I9000
I own itouch 4 and i9000 with miui 2.8.10 and i can say that the SGS not slow as you describe
_RiVeRsIDe_ said:
I own itouch 4 and i9000 with miui 2.8.10 and i can say that the SGS not slow as you describe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Itouch 4 maybe you have the 8gb one which is clocked to 600mhz and has 256mb ram. & believe me I had the iPhone 3GS in 2009 and I remember how everything was smooth even when I jailbroke it I OCed my iPhone to 800mhz and it became really fast. So idk... but now I know. Android uses CPU to render the UI, but as the new JELLYBEAN came out, its UI is rendered by the GPU which is how its supposed to be. That's why its alot smoother than previous android OS
Sent from my GT-I9000
The answer is quite simple: Apple produces hardware and software made only for this hardware, Android is only software which has to work on any device. Furthermore there are more specs than RAM size or CPU frequency. If the hardware is specialized for something, you don't need that heavy hardware.
E.g. Playstations: They are optimized for graphic rendering and do that really well without a great amount of Hardware (I think the latest has 256 MB of graphic RAM). But try running anything else (Windows, lol) on them, it will lagg like hell
Same thing with the iPhone.
Sent from my Gameboy Color
BlueFlame4 said:
The answer is quite simple: Apple produces hardware and software made only for this hardware, Android is only software which has to work on any device. Furthermore there are more specs than RAM size or CPU frequency. If the hardware is specialized for something, you don't need that heavy hardware.
E.g. Playstations: They are optimized for graphic rendering and do that really well without a great amount of Hardware (I think the latest has 256 MB of graphic RAM). But try running anything else (Windows, lol) on them, it will lagg like hell
Same thing with the iPhone.
Sent from my Gameboy Color
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that's the case, then why don't the android community create like groups? You know, Motorola Android group, Samsung Android group, HTC Android group etc. to ensure that the software is running according to the hardware! That'd be easier and cheaper for the companies too, plus will have a great impact on the reliability of the OS
Sent from my GT-I9000
Helloworld294 said:
Hey guys, I know its kind of a stupid thing to start a thread on so just spear with me
In 2009 I had an iPhone 3GS. Its was the latest iPhone in 2009 and was super fast. No lags on opening apps, closing apps, multitasking, scrolling screen and stuff like that. It was 99% LAGFREE. Games worked wonderful. I'm a big fan of hacking, so I jailbroke the iPhone and it still remained smooth and fast. For those who don't know, iPhone 3GS has a 779mhz CPU (apple clocked it down to 600mhz to prevent battery drains and other instabilities) and only 256mb ram. Now I have an international version of galaxy S that is clocked to 1.3 GHZ that has a 512 MB of RAM and believe me its slower than the iPhone. I just want to know what is wrong with our phones? Does apple use some magic superpowers on their devices? Opening apps lags, closing apps lags the home screen scrolling for some time, there are frequent crashing due to low RAM, there's lags in browser :S the music player lacks things as filtering of files, it has a worse reception than the iPhone 3gs. GPS is not goood. Even typing is sometimes laggy... the new jellybean made it a lil more like an iPhone due to its 60hz refresh rate and triple buffering but it still lags. Can you guys give me your opinions on this and stuff? Again I'm not trying to complain, I'm just wondering how could this be possible.
Sent from my GT-I9000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OEM ROMs are not that great, you should for sure try some custom ROMs:
(i) ICS: https://www.fixmystuff.in/FMS_Forum...dwich-4-0-4-on-samsung-galaxy-s-gt-i9000.125/
(ii) JB: https://www.fixmystuff.in/FMS_Forum/threads/installing-jelly-bean-4-1-on-galaxy-s-gt-i9000.131/
gopalasubramanium said:
OEM ROMs are not that great, you should for sure try some custom ROMs:
(i) ICS: https://www.fixmystuff.in/FMS_Forum...dwich-4-0-4-on-samsung-galaxy-s-gt-i9000.125/
(ii) JB: https://www.fixmystuff.in/FMS_Forum/threads/installing-jelly-bean-4-1-on-galaxy-s-gt-i9000.131/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My friend let me assure you the last time I had a stock ROM was when I first got this phone and I only had it for two days. then I went to cm7--->darky's rom--->cm9--->slim ics--->TAJB----> now hellybean 12/10 so yeah..
Sent from my GT-I9000