Database Develop

Nook @ 1.1GHz screams

Woohoo!!! Thanks to new kernel by Dalingrin, I'm running at 1.1GHz.
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
This is on Froyo 5.9, running off of emmc!!!
Was stoked and had to tell someone. Since I have no posts, it wouldn't let me post in dev forum. So here is my first post......
Cheers!

2015?! that's insane. i must try this...

Whoa and to think the galaxy tab only gets 1050...
Shows how nuch the nook kicks @ss

urbanengine1 said:
Whoa and to think the galaxy tab only gets 1050...
Shows how nuch the nook kicks @ss
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
50mhz more.....lollllllllll
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

I just installed the same kernel today and my NC is way faster. I don't know where to look for the quadrant info, but my pdf's are being rendered instantaneously. I was planning on returning my NC because pdf reading was a pain, but it works perfect now...

Yeah but try it on a real benchmark like smartbench and I bet it starts looking more realistic.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

eunkipark92 said:
50mhz more.....lollllllllll
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh? The tab gets around 1000 less

Could you give a brief explantion of how to do this?. I've only tried the autonoter so far.
Sent from my rooted Nook Color

That's exciting, how's the battery life, by the way?
hawaiianhopper said:
Woohoo!!! Thanks to new kernel by Dalingrin, I'm running at 1.1GHz.
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
This is on Froyo 5.9, running off of emmc!!!
Was stoked and had to tell someone. Since I have no posts, it wouldn't let me post in dev forum. So here is my first post......
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

hawaiianhopper said:
Woohoo!!! Thanks to new kernel by Dalingrin, I'm running at 1.1GHz.
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
This is on Froyo 5.9, running off of emmc!!!
Was stoked and had to tell someone. Since I have no posts, it wouldn't let me post in dev forum. So here is my first post......
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed the same kernel on Eclair and got ~1200. I've been running back to back benchmarks now and have gotten 1050, 972, 923, then 1211... Strange

hawaiianhopper said:
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure you didn't fat finger that 2?

shatteredeagle said:
Sure you didn't fat finger that 2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If he is running Froyo, no. Froyo easily sees a 300-500 point boost over eclair, because of the improved JIT compilier that is in Froyo.

hawaiianhopper said:
Woohoo!!! Thanks to new kernel by Dalingrin, I'm running at 1.1GHz.
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
This is on Froyo 5.9, running off of emmc!!!
Was stoked and had to tell someone. Since I have no posts, it wouldn't let me post in dev forum. So here is my first post......
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it stable though? And still undervolted?
Anyways, gTablet with most custom fw gets c. 2400-2500 but can hit 3200+ with some additional mods... still just a synthetic benchmark though...

hawaiianhopper said:
Woohoo!!! Thanks to new kernel by Dalingrin, I'm running at 1.1GHz.
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
This is on Froyo 5.9, running off of emmc!!!
Was stoked and had to tell someone. Since I have no posts, it wouldn't let me post in dev forum. So here is my first post......
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post a guide to installing? I can get it to work right. emmc is way faster, scoring 1478 at 800 right now.

2006 is the highest I can get....
I tried it about 10 times lol...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sorry about the URL. Using this picture elsewhere. Ever since getting out of the military and the soon to be ex wife turning off my Sprint phone, I've been flashing a lot of Android devices.

I was about to post a pic, but because I don't have enough posts to link outside, so I can't....
I got 2013 yesterday when I tried to take a screen cap.
It doesn't always get that high. Just every so often it does. Can't explain the differences.
Steps:
Followed original eemc thread in the "general" forum (not one from dev forum).
Got that working correctly.
then mount /boot and copy uImage over old one. reboot and presto!

What's amazing I'm running customized nookie 59 with the 1100 kernel on a class 4 8GB card. I'm getting the same speed as with the standard 59 image installed on the emmc.
edit; The pic is a little fuzzy, 2048 was my best score with setcpu set to performance. In conservative I seem to be around the 2020 ball park.
Beats the hell out of me. I would have never of thought it if I had not seen it with my own eyes.
I included the lock screen picture to prove it was the customized froyo, I don't think there is an img file of it that can be installed...yet.

urbanengine1 said:
Huh? The tab gets around 1000 less
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, quadrant scores database r/w pretty heavily and stock galaxy s and tabs are pretty bad there.
they're getting scores around 2900 on the archos gen 8's with ext4. it's with a oc to 1280 also. the biggest boost is b/c of the db r/w. at stock (1ghz) i think they were scoring 2400.

I thought I read that the Nook Color kernels still don't have the drivers for the graffics chip. If the graffics get sorted out we should another big jump.
For being an ereader, this thing is turning out to be the little engine that could. I wonder if the team that developed the NC had a tablet in mind or was it that TI had a tablet project that fell apart and they were just trying to salvage it. Either way its a surprising device.

just got my nook color and deciding on rooting it then OCing it ..
but undecided on eclair or froyo pathways..
the stock kernel eclair has gpu drivers and the froyo kernel does not right ?

Smartbench 2011 - multi-thread enabled!

Hi guys,
I'm not sure if any of you are aware, but I've developed Smartbench 2010 couple of months back for Android phones. But just like most other apps available today, version 2010 does not properly handle multiple cores. I am currently working on Smartbench 2011 which will handle multi-core processors by natively using 4 threads for CPU-related tests (hence the app is really quad-core ready).
Now given that Optimus 2X is the first dual-core phone to hit the market, I'm curious if 2011 works as expected, and also if Optimus 2X is properly configured to use the two cores.
I'd appreciate if anyone here could install and run this app and report the two scores - productivity and games. Smartbench 2011 will auto-submit all test run scores, so you will see a rapid increase in number of results you can compare against, once released to the general public.
Remember, this is a beta version (labeled v0.1) and you won't find it in the market place yet. As was the case with 2010, this one will also be available for free eventually.
Here's the link:
[Link removed]
Thanks much!
EDIT: Smartbench 2011 v0.7 has been released. It will now allow you to sort results by either Average, Productivity or Games scores. Please re-install this version.
EDIT2: Smartbench 2011 v0.8 has been released. It now offers a filtering option - you can see all results or just stock clock speed results. Mandelbrot test also has been extended for better precision. Again, please re-install this version.
EDIT3: I have just published Smartbench v1.0 in the Android Market - please install this version moving forward. Results submitted by the BETA version will no longer be stored in the server DB. Your support during the BETA period has been very helpful!

Hi-
I own the Korean version of the Optimus 2x (su660) which has been rooted. I ran the bench and submitted the scores....the games/productivity scores were around 1300/2000

Thank you, I can see them.
I can also see which apps don't behave well with multiple cores right now - I need to further optimize them. It appears that 'Pi' actually executes amost 3 times faster on 2X than it does on HTC G2! But Mandelbrot does no where near as well, which implies there are some artificial bottlenecks within my Mandelbrot code. I need to experiment further into this.
Thanks everyone who submitted the scores - they were very helpful.

Hi again,
I've made several modifications to the original code. I hope the artificial bottleneck that existed in the Mandelbrot test that caused low scores on 2X is now resolved. Also, I've completely removed the File IO tests mainly because I noticed that 2X produces especially inconsistent results. Samsung Galaxy S also had similar issues so I might as well not use it. I've also added new test which basically deals with large string data and also performs some regular expressions on them.
For those who are interested, please install and run the app. It will automatically submit the results to the server, and the result chart will automatically display them.
Thanks again!

Dl'ed the new version and ran it again. Scores similar to the Atrix scores. Not exactly sure what they mean, but hopefully it helps

cvitur1 said:
Dl'ed the new version and ran it again. Scores similar to the Atrix scores. Not exactly sure what they mean, but hopefully it helps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should be similar to Atrix since both are Tegra 2 based.
You have two scores in Smartbench - Productivity and Games Indexes. Productivity Index is more relevant for people who use any apps that do not use the GPU, while Games Index is more relevant if you are interested in GPU accelerated apps such as 3D games.
Thanks for the feedback.

Smartbench 2011 v0.7 has been released. It will now allow you to sort results by either Average, Productivity or Games scores. Please re-install this version.

Smartbench 2011 v0.8 has been released. It now offers a filtering option - you can see all results or just stock clock speed results. Mandelbrot test also has been extended for better precision. Again, please re-install this version.

My OP2X - 2981/ 2561
Non Rooted.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

EDIT3: I have just published Smartbench v1.0 in the Android Market - please install this version moving forward. Results submitted by the BETA version will no longer be stored in the server DB. Your support during the BETA period has been very helpful!

HTC Magic
I tried it on my HTC Magic to see what sort of a differance it would give on a crap phone versus a high-end one. Results were, well, horrible
Productivity: 100 something
Games: 200 something

lyberikus said:
I tried it on my HTC Magic to see what sort of a differance it would give on a crap phone versus a high-end one. Results were, well, horrible
Productivity: 100 something
Games: 200 something
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not surprised.

Just ran this on my Dell Streak 7, clocked at 1.6ghz and scored 4096 games, 2900 productivity

On my rooted o2x (su660) has 1.4ghz oc kernel and GB stock rom,
It scored 3594 productivity , 3357 games.

I get nothing but adverts PILE OF CRAP

My bench

What is everyone's Quadrant Scores?

I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?

CM7 Quadrant Error
duglas said:
I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine gets an "internal error" on "CPU Video Decoding." So, nothing yet.

duglas said:
I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Score is kind of low. I got a 1164 I am running Nookie Froyo with a 1.1Ghz kernel.
Is honeycomb significantly faster?
It appears it gets hung for a second on Video and Audio decoding. My Motorola Droid is running Project Elite V5.2 overclocked at 1.1Ghz and it scores a 1832 quadrant score.

Roughly 1,050-1,100 on Autonooter 3.0 @1GHz.
My OG Droid on CM7 #13 gets 881 @800MHz. But it FEELS faster. It's odd that the NC doesn't see the immediate performance improvements brought on with Froyo like phones did. Maybe the ROM's just aren't as developed so intensely. Hopefully someone running CM7 for NC can chime in so we can compare.

duglas said:
I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same configuration running off a Class 6 SDCard gets me ~1200 (just under the Droid X on the comparison screen). I thought this was great until I saw your score...

On CM7 Nightly v14 with CWM 3.0.1.0....
Quadrant testing died when it got to H.264 decoding. No DSP video yet.

I can't even get it to run on Stock rooted. After I click yet after the test it just gets a service error and shows black screen.

Reneg4d3 said:
My Score is kind of low. I got a 1164 I am running Nookie Froyo with a 1.1Ghz kernel.
Is honeycomb significantly faster?
It appears it gets hung for a second on Video and Audio decoding. My Motorola Droid is running Project Elite V5.2 overclocked at 1.1Ghz and it scores a 1832 quadrant score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is something that has stuck me as odd, since i remember earlier Froyo builds that i ran getting well into 1600-1800+.. but like yours mine right now only gets ~1200..

Wow, dont know why you all are getting such low numbers, running HC v4 off EMMC I am getting 1800+ almost every time. Any insight on this?

benchmarks are just numbers, don't worry about your quadrant scores. worry on real world performance

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

I 've just got a 2613 with Cyanogen 7 overclocked to 1.2.

1511 running off internal memory with CM7 Nightly 55 at 925Mhz

Quadrant is seriously flawed
I get anywhere from 3200 ~ 3700+ on my stock unrooted SGS 2

cm7 7.0.2 925mhz on SD card anywhere between 1600-1800

Nook Color 1.2 Rooted - Quadrant and Linpack Scores

Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

The linpack mflops looks great. I get 11 on a tweaked out 2.6.29 @800mhz
The quadrant isn't amazing but I think its at least an improvement over the stock 2.6.29 kernel. I get 1800-1900 running my latest test kernel @ 800mhz on Gingerbread(quadrant typically scores less in Gingerbread than Froyo unlike other benchmarks)
Looks like 2.6.32 has some potential.

Holy crap....
This is going to be great once we get kernel source and can undervolt/overlcock this sucka

Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.

notinterested said:
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.

dsf3g said:
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.

s52m3 said:
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?

Masterface7 said:
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.

dalingrin said:
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have found the exact opposite to be true. I go to a site that has videos not optimized for mobile and on CM7 they are simply not watchable. With the 1.2 flash its not perfect but certainly better than it is in CM7. Which is surprising because when im on CM7 i run 1100MHZ compared to the 800 with the 1.2 flash.

Anyone else have linpack scores on 1.2 they can post?

Linpack score sux
davidukfl said:
Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
LINKPACK
score is 6.056 mflops, in 13.84 seconds, normal resolution 5.68, set cpu 925 mhz max/min running cyanogen 7.0.3 will all processes closed.
QUADRANT STANDARD
score is avg roughly 900 and i'm getting anywhere from 3 to 38 fps.
i've owned n1, m.droid, evo and now dinc that all ran cyanogen and never saw such low scores. i don't know if this nook color is just a little premature or that i'm putting too much emphasis on these scores but i believe there's a 2 ghz tablet around the corner with more horsepower. what do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Why did you bump this just to scatter crap?
Running CM7 and OC, I'm hitting quad scores of 2400-3000
Try messing with the NC more before you write it off.

I also agree...
If you are getting scores that low, then something is wrong, wrong, wrong.
I am operating on the CM 7.0.3 and have the thing OC'd at 1300.
I get consistent scores in the 2500 - 2900 range...
Lego

Daily usage and Gaming performance issue (HELP)

Hi. First of all i search all the forum but couldnt find any solution. As i mentioned Daily usage and gaming became a burden for me. Frankly im suprised that choppy behavior. My brother has HTC m8 and we compared both devices and i lost all of the games
with HTC m8 there is no lag in games and scrolling and browsing the internet, but with note 5 gaming and scrolling is a big issue for me and im really dissappointed. Any help appreciated thanks.
CPUz information\
Samsung Exynos octa 7420
cores=8
big.LITTLE- HMP
Architecture 4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 2.10ghz
4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1.50ghz
revision. R1p0
Process 14 nm
Gpu renderer mali t760
DEVICE
AT&T
samsung. universal 7420
Hardware samsungexynos 7420
Total ram 3663
Available 734 Mb
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Edit :I also tried clear cache
Cant upload pıctures due to message limit . sorry for disturbance

no solutions ?

gezgin__ said:
no solutions ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download Game Tuner from Play Store by Samsung and on opening it'll prompt you to download gameservice on galaxy apps!
Choose Custom and configure your games like: Resolution: Low(720p) and fps: 60 and launch your games from the Game Tuner app. Should be better!

Fullmetal Jun said:
Download Game Tuner from Play Store by Samsung and on opening it'll prompt you to download gameservice on galaxy apps!
Choose Custom and configure your games like: Resolution: Low(720p) and fps: 60 and launch your games from the Game Tuner app. Should be better!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you but still same not working properly. and i wonder isnt that device able to run high end games smoothly _

gezgin__ said:
Thank you but still same not working properly. and i wonder isnt that device able to run high end games smoothly _
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure your device is up to date. Try running antutu benchmark and compare your score! Something appears wrong with your device.
Exynos 7420 and its gpu run Real Racing 3 or Dead Effect 2 and other heavy games as smooth as it gets..

Fullmetal Jun said:
Make sure your device is up to date. Try running antutu benchmark and compare your score! Something appears wrong with your device.
Exynos 7420 and its gpu run Real Racing 3 or Dead Effect 2 and other heavy games as smooth as it gets..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will test and post here with screen shots. I already tested antutu at first day it was 76k then it dropped below 65k (second time)

gezgin__ said:
I will test and post here with screen shots. I already tested antutu at first day it was 76k then it dropped below 65k (second time)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tested my device With;
3dmark
antutu
GFXopenGL
geekbench3
and uploaded pictures . thank you.

gezgin__ said:
I tested my device With;
3dmark
antutu
GFXopenGL
geekbench3
and uploaded pictures . thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now that's a lot of testing Pretty sure the scores look normal although I don't know the last ones, but you can always compare.
I'm pretty sure it's the games you're playing. They're probably not yet optimized for the Note 5. Ask their developers!
Or I guess your gaming needs are too high for this phone! An iPhone 6S or a Nexus 9 might give you a better gaming experience although the Note 5 is still a fantastic gaming device!

Fullmetal Jun said:
Now that's a lot of testing Pretty sure the scores look normal although I don't know the last ones, but you can always compare.
I'm pretty sure it's the games you're playing. They're probably not yet optimized for the Note 5. Ask their developers!
Or I guess your gaming needs are too high for this phone! An iPhone 6S or a Nexus 9 might give you a better gaming experience although the Note 5 is still a fantastic gaming device!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well actually games like shark Evo or any stickman games Im often facing with frame skipping waiting for the 6.0 upgrade if not i will want refund. Thank you for your cooperation