How do I get ext4 on my tmobile galaxy tab?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
From what I read koushes clockworkmod recovery converts your system to ext4. But I think its for vzw. I tried with my tmo tab and I could of sworn I stood at rfs. Not sure. But would love to see a voodoo kernal
Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk
I hacked it on my epic 4g and its been great. so am I to believe that there its no ext4 hack and no voice dialer hack with 3g?
mikenicee said:
I hacked it on my epic 4g and its been great. so am I to believe that there its no ext4 hack and no voice dialer hack with 3g?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How much performance did you gain with ext4 ?
Alcibiade said:
How much performance did you gain with ext4 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to Quadrant...nothing.
read this if you want to learn about ext4.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4
mikenicee said:
I hacked it on my epic 4g and its been great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you sure you hacked it or you used a voodoo kernal?
Ext4 definitely made the phone more snappy along with froyo rom
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Coolsaber57 said:
According to Quadrant...nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant scores do not relate to actual phone use though.
Sent from my GT-P1000
mikenicee said:
Ext4 definitely made the phone more snappy along with froyo rom
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you were coming fromEclair to Froyo it's not very surprising...
GANJDROID said:
Quadrant scores do not relate to actual phone use though.
Sent from my GT-P1000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, I agree, but it's difficult to put show qualitative benefits of ext4 vs. rfs.
Coolsaber57 said:
Oh, I agree, but it's difficult to put show qualitative benefits of ext4 vs. rfs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well why did samsung ditch rfs to ext4 for the nexus s?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk
b0ricuaguerrero said:
Well why did samsung ditch rfs to ext4 for the nexus s?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it was not Samsung who was coding for the Nexus S! Nexus S has nothing to do with Samsung it is all done by Google! Only the hardware and its warrenty is related to Samsung. All firmwares/ROMs and Kernals will be released by Google and google only! This is why it is call a true google phone!
You can read about it on Theodore Ts'os blog.
rmanaudio said:
This is why it is call a true google phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
shame on samsung for making us use rfs, would be nice to have a voodoo kernal
GANJDROID said:
Quadrant scores do not relate to actual phone use though.
Sent from my GT-P1000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ext4 file system make read/write operations at least twice faster compare to RFS. It allows for file size exceeding 2GB as well. Besides it has journaling capabilty.
All this greatly reduces lags and glitches especially for video and when switching tasks that involves read/write operations.
My experience with ext4 on Vibrant is very positive.
RFS is fat16 or fat32 with a journal.
It is also proprietary to Samsung and no source code for it is released, so it is not very good for AOSP release. And in everyone's experience it performs like ****.
The RFS stack (probably storage.ko) also contains sector remapping/wear levelling module that implements stl on top of bml. So while it is easy to switch to extX on top of stl its gonna be much harder to implement it on top of raw mtd flash for .35 kernel on tab. The flash chip in Nexus S most likely has wear levelling built in. But on Tab it is done on software.
GANJDROID said:
Quadrant scores do not relate to actual phone use though.
Sent from my GT-P1000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not always true. The problem is that quadrant can be "tricked" into a higher score (EXT2, EXT3). However, ext4 is a true "lag fix" and thus the performance gain is real. There is a "real world" gain after converting to EXT4. The problem as I understand it with the Tabs right now is that we don't know if it is actually working. Give it time and we will see the same progress as we see in the Galaxy S phone.....
Related
My goal in posting this was to get a vibrant dev on it, and ttabbal has taken on the task. Thanks to him. His thread is http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=822964 this thread can be closed.
This looks very promising, curious to see how that shakes out on the US variants...
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Isn't that what voodoo does?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Voodoo requires a special kernel, but what if you wanted stock kernel and ext 4? Thats where this comes in I think.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
This looks like a major step in the right direction. I Can't wait to see support for the Vibrant so we can rid ourselves of rfs. Whew!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
This also looks like it requires a kernel, and EXT4 is the clear choice, so its the same as Voodoo to me.
wildklymr said:
Voodoo requires a special kernel, but what if you wanted stock kernel and ext 4? Thats where this comes in I think.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But you would still have to mod the stock kernel to allow for this? I don't think the stock kernel supports ext4 right?
Either way, this is pretty awesome =)
zimphishmonger said:
This also looks like it requires a kernel, and EXT4 is the clear choice, so its the same as Voodoo to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed.... But I am ok with new ideas. Might find something useful that can be married into voodoo. Too bad I have the larger NAND chip, so I am still w/o voodoo. :/
siirial said:
Agreed.... But I am ok with new ideas. Might find something useful that can be married into voodoo. Too bad I have the larger NAND chip, so I am still w/o voodoo. :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ehh...hopefully they get the beta5 for Voodoo out soon. It works really well
siirial said:
Agreed.... But I am ok with new ideas. Might find something useful that can be married into voodoo. Too bad I have the larger NAND chip, so I am still w/o voodoo. :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=805222
Thought it might help.
siirial said:
Agreed.... But I am ok with new ideas. Might find something useful that can be married into voodoo. Too bad I have the larger NAND chip, so I am still w/o voodoo. :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would agree, but voodoo doesn't have the /system and /dbdata which would speed up other apps for me. For example touchdown connected to exchange still has a bunch of lag but everything else flys.
I believe if all is converted then the whole phone and all apps and task would be much zippier. I may be wrong though, when I used ryanza ext 2 mod touchdown would load instantly. Voodoo takes at least 5 seconds.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
The thing is, Ziggy is looking at a total RFS replacement vs supercurio's /data rfs replacement. So the entire phone would run much better and more efficiently.
http://z4ziggy.wordpress.com/
dasunsrule32 said:
The thing is, Ziggy is looking at a total RFS replacement vs supercurio's /data rfs replacement. So the entire phone would run much better and more efficiently.
http://z4ziggy.wordpress.com/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly my point. All the file system is converted instead of just /data = better than voodoo IMO.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
wildklymr said:
Apparently z4ziggy and ryanZA over in the i9000 forum found a way from what it seems to totally convert the data partition to either ext2 3 or 4.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/sho...ns out.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lralexl said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=805222
Thought it might help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
supercurio hasn't tweeted anything about a release for beta 5. So...I might take whatever master says with a grain of salt. Oh...look at the time of the last edit - 10/13.
I'm considering building a kernel with the init.rc and other changes needed for this mid. Probably look into it next week.
ttabbal said:
I'm considering building a kernel with the init.rc and other changes needed for this mid. Probably look into it next week.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice... Looking forward to it!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I have a large NAND vibrant and have been waiting for voodoo beta 5. Tried this last night with the JI6 kernel. It worked! I'm using ext2 right now. I haven't tried going back to RFS yet. I hope to try that today. If it works and time allows I'm going to try a Jac kernel and ext4.
This is only converting /data right now but the user experience is excellent. I haven't noticed any lag at all and there are no space limitations like with the loop back setup.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Keep us updated fastkatt, I too have the larger NAND chips and have been dying for a decent lag fix. I know there is a voodoo workaround, but noone can explain exactly what it does. I would prefer something that accounts for the extra space and makes use of it.
Can anyone tell me how to determine the size of the NAND in my Vibrant? I have seached this but have not found the answer....
Thnaks..
I just installed voodoo and then used oclf, but now my accelerometer is all jacked up, anyone else have this problem or know a way to fix it?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
InobleI said:
I just installed voodoo and then used oclf, but now my accelerometer is all jacked up, anyone else have this problem or know a way to fix it?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stupid question but why would you put oclf over voodoo
Captivate
Cog 2.2
I saw it on a forum, and after I did it it went from a quadrant score of 1600 to 2300, so it works but the only thing that doesn't work is my accelerometer
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
What Rom are you on? The only suggestion I can make is to remove one of the Lagfix. Or flash back stock. I would search the thread or even just Google your problem. Someone may of had the same issue and found a way to fix
Captivate
Cog 2.2
You're kidding, right? Please tell me you're a troll and you didn't really put OCLF on top of voodoo.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
That was a sarcastic way of saying take one of the lagfixes off.
Plus it doesn't help
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
I'll show you the thread, I just followed directions.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Don't put OCLF on top of anything.
If you're interested in something faster than voodoo, check out SetiroN's kernel and/or the ROM's that use it. Such as in my sig.
What's the quadrant score on that?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Quadrant score has nothing to do with how it performs.
MikeyMike01 said:
Don't put OCLF on top of anything.
If you're interested in something faster than voodoo, check out SetiroN's kernel and/or the ROM's that use it. Such as in my sig.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The last two lagfix options in SetitoN's (or stutzy's) kernel are basically the same thing as oclf over top of voodoo - though the on only thing that would be good for is quadrant scores, won't really notice much of a real world performance dif. And that kind of lagfix combo is really going to cut into your available space on your data partition.
Then what would you recommend performance wise
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Honestly you sound like a noob and SetiroN's kernel requires a certain skill level to install / debug because it is still in alpha stages.
Just stick with Cognition if you want my advice. It is plenty fast, has a great battery life, and automatically works with Voodoo. And it is fairly stable. OCLF on top of it will not help.
In my experience SetiroN's kernel has better performance but takes a cut in the battery life and also has some wierd bugs.. you don't have full functionality in every way... lots of people like it... but if you want my recommendation it's going to be a lot of work for you so go with Cog instead. if you go with setiroN expect to put in a number of hours learning how to get it working.. and expect a few people on that thread (not setiroN) to flame you if you post a question about hwo to get it working. last night there was a lot of drama. larger point is you will probably get criticized there from a few bad apples.
I am a noob, but I can figure stuff out, I'll give it a try. Thanks.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
InobleI said:
Then what would you recommend performance wise
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am currently running Cog rom SetiroN's kernel with jfs advanced all jfs lagfix and I am happy with my phone's performance.
Don't know if this is the best performance or not as that is somewhat subjective as to what will rework best for every one on their own phone with their own configuration.
My recommendation is run what you want to run on your phone. If quad scores are important oclf type lagfix's that make some type of buffer that sets on top the data partition will always outperform in the quad's input/out bench mark and get overall better quad scores, but the buffer wil take up valuable space on your data partition.
The only way you can know for sure what works best for you is to try them out, do some actual time trials and stress tests with the apps you use and pick which one you like best.
What ever lagfix you choose make sure you know how to properly disable it when needed before you actually install that lagfix.
Ok cool, I really like cog ill try putting SetrioN kernel on it, thanks man
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
InobleI said:
Ok cool, I really like cog ill try putting SetrioN kernel on it, thanks man
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just my 2 cents but make sure you read up and understand Setroin before you flash it
Captivate
Cog 2.2
Yup just did, I gave cog with SetrioN
Kernel, its working out great so far, thanks a lot.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
This may be a completely stupid question but I've been flashing roms for a while now... Tried pretty much every rom for the captivate and I noticed that lagfix makes my phone lag.. The only thing "better" seems to be quadrant scores.. Is that normal? Am I missing something? Lol any input would be great.. Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Oh I am currently using apex 7.2 .. And I disabled lagfix .. Is it ok if I disabled both settings in cwm? Just want the best possible settings.. Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Don't worry about quadrant and linpack scores. Just focus on your experience on the rfs and ext4. Which one do you think is better? Personally I use rfs because some people say it saves battery, and it does not get corrupt as easily as ext4. But really its your ppreference.
I have noticed that when I click a button, I usually have to wait from 1-2 seconds before I get a response. Would lagfix take care of this? I'm running stock Froyo.
As many have stated all the lagfix does is help fix the very slow rts file system, it most likely would not help in your case.
Best thing to do is delete unused apps, and reboot the phone every day or to(seems to help mine out, cant guarantee results)
Also if you havent needed root in 5 months you probably don't need it
Unless you want to use opitimised roms, I dont see why you would need to root. Check your memory usage delete unused apps and reboot the phone ever once in a while.
My honest opinion, no reason to have an android phone if you are not using roms
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
mcord11758 said:
My honest opinion, no reason to have an android phone if you are not using roms
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gonna have to agree with mcord here. had to go back to stock froyo for about 5 hours (didnt have all my tool to get back my 2.3.4 ROM) and it was horrible.
you might not be up for it but i really recommend flashing a Froyo Custom ROM from one of the xda DEVs. you'll love your phone and be amazed that it can be so much smoother and responsive.
First thing I did after i rooted was flashed a new kernel to overclock. Performance increased but battery life was poor. Then my first rom was cm7..been hooked since..tried miui once then went back to cm7.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
This is what lagfix can do for your phone.
Im using stock mosaic V 2.3.4 rom with no overclock.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Providing arbitrary benchmarks does not seem like an actual reason to employ a lag fix.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
z28james said:
Providing arbitrary benchmarks does not seem like an actual reason to employ a lag fix.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No a Benchmark score is not the best example to lag fix your phone ,but the more power you get, plus better battery life and, better perrformance are great reasons to lag fix your phone. I just posted the quadrant score so kb0npw can see the increase performance from normal rfs file system to ext4(lag fix).
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
godpancho said:
This is what lagfix can do for your phone.
Im using stock mosaic V 2.3.4 rom with no overclock.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol people always thinking benchmarks scores mean everything
diminished5th said:
Lol people always thinking benchmarks scores mean everything
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont think he thought it meant everything, he was giving a simple before and after which showed some improvement. Quadrant can actually be pretty useful when trying to gauge what effects certain changes have on your phone, say you score a 1900 before you change 'x' and then 2200 after that change, then you know its increased performance somewhat and youre moving in the right direction. How much it has increased your performance is debatable, however. My point is quadrant can be a useful tool when making changes on your phone if you take it with a grain of salt.
EDIT: To answer op's question, Read up on some custom roms and flash one, the difference is phenomenal and you'll wonder how you went 5 months without them. If you have any other questions feel free to pm me and I'll see what help I can be
In your opinion, which is better, CyanogenMod or Overcome? Currently, I'm running Overcome 2.0, but have often noticed lag when I'm using it, though I'm not sure if this is a problem with the ROM.
Overcome 3.10 it looks good and is fast. I prefer touchwiz to cyanogenmod because of task manager and other samsung apps.
If you want speed go for cyanogenmod, if you want more functionality go for overcome.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
I thought it was the other way around...
Medikay said:
I thought it was the other way around...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, because cyanogenmod has all bloatware removed so it is faster.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
cm7 is fast but missing optimize code for tab , your music player drain 3time more than stock kernel. most video codec need software decoder. These are stopper if you use them frequency.
but things i love in cm7 is theme , i love white notification bar which cannot find in other roms.
you also can redesign auto brightness level to work as it should to be.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
ani55 said:
No, because cyanogenmod has all bloatware removed so it is faster.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i remove all bloatware in overcome but quatrant score doesn't change.i think it about kernel performance.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
I like the cm7 it has alot of customizable stuff ex. The built in theme chooser... I have had cm7 on both mine n my girls phone for a while no problems im waiting for the honeycomb release coming up that should be great when it finished as well
zoftdev said:
i remove all bloatware in overcome but quatrant score doesn't change.i think it about kernel performance.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you, performance are not calculated by numbers of bloatware. Quadrant checks how fast your tab performs when doing integer, float, etc calculations, and also io checks (read, write database), 2D graphics and 3D.
check out my post about this.
if you look for speed, true open source softwares, get cm7
If you look for a balance between battery life and performance and also some stock softwares, get Overcome (if ur ok with ads blocked), the flashing knowledge is a bonus as well (thanks to thepitbull with his extensive howto).
If what you need only undervolt, add koxudaxi kernel to your stock rom.
zoftdev said:
i remove all bloatware in overcome but quatrant score doesn't change.i think it about kernel performance.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant tests kernel, hardware and software. You may have removed bloatware but touchwiz is still there right.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App