I know you guys have talked about this already, but has anyone tried to load it? Maybe a derivitive of the HD2 rom for WP7? I bet anything that it would work, it would just be a little slower.....please give some feedback for this thread
i agree the tp2 deserves a try they said we couldn't overclock now look @ us
P.S also make a CDMA version for us sprint people
I'm sure someone could get it running. Nothing is impossible.
doublen1 said:
I'm sure someone could get it running. Nothing is impossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 to that.
The problem is the processor architecture...
WP7 on TP2
I bet that it wouldn't matter, they say the requirements are what they are, but they can operate on lower specs, just won't operate at optimum efficiency. If the HD2 and WP7 Phones are at 1ghz, its not bad that we are at 748mhz+. I bet it will work!!! I know technical aspects, but it sucks I don't know how to actually do any of it!!!! Maybe someone should come up with a bounty
RedWolf023 said:
I bet that it wouldn't matter, they say the requirements are what they are, but they can operate on lower specs, just won't operate at optimum efficiency. If the HD2 and WP7 Phones are at 1ghz, its not bad that we are at 748mhz+. I bet it will work!!! I know technical aspects, but it sucks I don't know how to actually do any of it!!!! Maybe someone should come up with a bounty
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whatever, TP2 runs a Qualcomm processor ARMv6, while Snapdragon is ARMv7.
WP7 requires ARMv7.
It's not as easy as you think, guys.
can we get it
maybe lescro could chime in
No, we can NOT get WP7 ever. It's just not possible. As Jackos said, WP7 is built on ARMv7. The TP2 has an ARMv6 chipset. The ARMv6 CPU just can't execute the code in WP7. It has nothing to due with the speed of the CPU. Just like how certain Adobe software doesn't work on old AMD/Intel CPU's because they're missing the SSE2 instruction set.
EDIT: This has been stated by Da_G many times & trust me, he knows what he's talking about. Follow Da_G on Twitter.
Mod, please close this thread.
It is possible but very difficult to do. Some has to make it ARMv6 able.
WP7 on TP2
Like others said, it was impossible to OC our TP2's, and now look!!! You're right, the WP7 on an ARMv6 core would be difficult to do, but someone can do it! It's kind depressing that everyone keeps saying "never" will we have it on the TP2. If you can create a theme from throttlelauncher that does just about everything that the WP7 itself can do, I would wager that you could modify the WP7 rom to execute off of the ARMv6 core....problem is nobody wants to spend the time to do so for free, so we should come up with a bounty.
Actually when these devs tell you that the code can not run they aren't explaining (rightfully because it might fall on deaf ears) that windows ce is closed source so changing anything would require a large amount of work if the kernel can be changed at all. Its not like the linux kernel where we can go in and change things in the source code then compile. WP7 is what it is its like saying that windows 7 can run on an arm processor yeah it probably could but you would have to change the kernel which i believe only microsoft has the ability to do. Just tough it out like the rest of us until your upgrade date. Please no more WP7 on TP2 threads
is this really a question? FIRST of all, it is impossible. Second of all, there are various themes that would be more stable than any wm7 port if there was ever a dev who had some magical touch. yeah, we can overclock. but who here can safely oc to 1g? closest i get is 768. and that gets touchy.
believe me, theres no way/reason to do this. just buy a new phone
WP7 on TP2
My only problem, which is quite a personal problem, is that I am not allowed to have a camera on my phone where I work.....so this blows because they will not make any more cameraless phones. So anything to make my TP2 any better, I'm all game. Besides, I absolutely HATE on screen keyboards, no matter how accurate they are. Again, just a personal problem.
You're job will end up changing that rule. They have too, because cameraless cell are sadly a thing of the past. I don't know a single person who doesn't have a camera on their cell. As for the hardware KB, check out the HTC 7 Pro. It's a 1Ghz Snapdragon WP7 version of the TP2.
Somethings are impossible.... Overclocking is one thing but executing code compiled for a different CPU is NOT the same thing!
As others have pointed out, it's ARM v6 vs V7 and it's not a code issue - its a microcode issue - the v6 does not have the same instruction set so the code cannot execute.
Short of M$ recompiling the code (not very likely), releasing the source (even less likely) or writing a V6 interpreting shell (can you say SLOW) it ain't going to happen.
Deal with it and wait till your contract is over and get a new phone when you can
drkfngthdragnlrd said:
You're job will end up changing that rule. They have too, because cameraless cell are sadly a thing of the past. I don't know a single person who doesn't have a camera on their cell. As for the hardware KB, check out the HTC 7 Pro. It's a 1Ghz Snapdragon WP7 version of the TP2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I am 100% Certain my work will not change that rule. They will prohibit cell phones altogether before allowing a camera. But I will check out the HTC 7 pro
if you go to wp7 forum theres alot of problems with that phone
...like any phone
but there are alot of themes for our phone
like lesscrco wp7
BTW. Why would anyone need WP7 on TP2? Imho it's good enough with WM6.5.
WP7 would only decrease the functionality and cause problems like battery life or performance.
Emulator
Emulation is possible, ask the people who wrote BOCHS or Pear PC.
However, it's absolutely not practical to go down this route. It would require an amazing amount of work for what would be a very slow WP7 device with no battery life.
The time and money spent on a project like this would be better put to improving WM6 or Android.
1milenia said:
if you go to wp7 forum theres alot of problems with that phone
...like any phone
but there are alot of themes for our phone
like lesscrco wp7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bought my wife the Samsung Focus and we have absolutely no problems with it. WP7 is perfect just left stock. WP7 is probably the best PPC OS out there now.
Related
Maybe I something missed or not...
I think everyone who use shift want that it become fullphone.
I`m sure that everyone ready to donate 50$ for this function.
but there are just one person who can do it, cmonex?
I call all to join to this who want this functionality we`ll make a foundation and donate money for this deal.
just one and final question to cmonex: will you do it and does it possible?
P.S. maybe someone other be able to do it?
why not,
I donate for SD Card funtionality too, if that works, we can porting Windows Mobile 6.1 to Shift, and maybe - later we can use Display drivers from HTC Touch HD
Maybe then the shift is useful
why not...
yes... count me in too... //_^
And then we could sell it to htc... hehe
Since they are incapable to give us a fully functional device, and they are not software supportive... to let us use it in higher computing speeds like ... not vista?
The vista thing is too much for the shift and you know it...
The shift is supposed to be a solution for the modern man, that has the need for a computer and a phone use simultaneously.
The shift is supposed to be a solution for us and not trouble...
I don't want to be radio waved by two devices every day... my Shift and my w810i ...
Honorably Yours,
P.S.
I 've made a small search about it's processor expandability.
And the news so far are bad... sort of...
They used a radio board that is not expendable.. at all... the processor socket is μFC-BGA663. A technology that has not been used for anything else... 0,90 nn in a parallelogram design. (not square!) As they use to.
The atoms are in a 0,45 nn technology with the μFC-BGA 478 and μFC-BGA 479 sockets...
I checked intel's site and i found that the information for the A100 and A110 "Steally" processors have only few information. AND THEY ARE NOT ON THE MAIN MENU!
They are allready passed the technology.
Why don't they make something in 0,45 nn for 663? (bigger chip more space... they could fit a quad or trio in there for crying out loud!... they have the tech to do it. They fit all ready dual cores in 478-9).
So forget about them too...
No daughterboard so far made to support another processor either...
So we could hope for a daughterboard ... but in a very small size :/
Anyway's ... if someone made this type of search and wants to share some information... i'm full ears. I'm really interested in upgrading the CPU.
Thank You.
50 US$: ok, but...
I would like to donate 50$ for this project (and I'll probably do that).
But do you really think that having a couple more of **** to "burn" should solve the problem? I mean: we're all beta-testers for new ROM's, and I read many posts of very clever people talking about daughterboards (and I really don't understand a single word of it, sorry ) . I mean: every strenght is just out there: people succeding in installing ubuntu or Xp Tablet, in changeing HDD, others waiting for new RAM to be produced, many cooking ROM's... Not to talk about software and optimization tips&tricks... What else do we need? I think: just some coordination, someone able to say "Ok, guys, we did this and we need to do that: let's try this way". Am I wrong?
So: if some of you needs his time to be paid I totally agree and I will give my contribution (I don't even want to think about any mean of "control" on the job that will be done), but if the only problem is to "beta-test" new solutions, sjust open a new thread, maybe naming it: "Do That On Your Risk"
Of course this is all IMHO
cmonex, where are you?
hehe, you all are right
normaly the best way is, to sell the shift and maybe you lose not to much money if you do that "now". Better to loose now 200-400€, as wait for semiprofessional solutions that comes maybe next half year. I buyed the Advantage X7510 befor i buyed the Shift, (better known as MDA AMEO 16GB) and they was **** too, i loosed as I resell them 400€ ;-) Then I believe in Shift, and this Device is not really better.
Best way is to buy a NET PC that is much cheaper - or if you want professional 8.9" Screen with Touchscreen (as sample) use the Fujitsu Siemens TabletPC Lifebook P1620. That is all much better to use, as an shift..
I´m really angry about HTC, I think, i have buyed most of all HTC´s that was sell in Europe, we have maybe 7000 USers with most Windows Mobile Push Services and most HTC Devices. But the quality is sometimes good, sometimes bad.
And the End of the Song: We have buyed 20000 Client Licences for Blackberry..
Sad, since 2001 I provide HTC Devices (or Operators branded HTC Devices) at the Side our customers and now I think that is the End...
I have try many other Devices from other companys then HTC, but most of them have same or related problems like HTC devices.
But for me is it not longer a problem, i have quit my job as technical responsible for that in our company last week and change to a other company - maybe then I have new Visions
howto deploy a Email Push Service for over 100000 Users
And maybe, it is not a WM Device, Not A Blackberry, maybe it is Nokia ´s Intellisync V9 Services, that works really stable on Nokia´s long powered S60 Phones.
And maybe: Nokia listen to my questions, improvements.
Maybe there is hope ;-)
Well, I think that there are two kinds of problems:
1. Software/ROM: and I just spoke of this a few posts ago.
2. Hardware: as much as you try to push Shift's functionality to the highest level, you'll always have to manage with RAM and processor... And as far as I can see, most of ROM's here published and cooked don't allow much more programs to be installed (I'm currently using Pli's ROM, and I just installed PhatNotes, then almost no more room for other things!!!). And I think that the most we try to get from our Shift, the less space we will have.
Anyway: when we bought Shift we all knew which were its limits, and more or less we accepted them. To me the only important missing SW is a web browser (PIE or Opera ). Not absolute need for GPS, and I can say I could live even without phone-on-shift.
As always IMHO
Hileotech said:
Well, I think that there are two kinds of problems:
1. Software/ROM: and I just spoke of this a few posts ago.
2. Hardware: as much as you try to push Shift's functionality to the highest level, you'll always have to manage with RAM and processor... And as far as I can see, most of ROM's here published and cooked don't allow much more programs to be installed (I'm currently using Pli's ROM, and I just installed PhatNotes, then almost no more room for other things!!!). And I think that the most we try to get from our Shift, the less space we will have.
Anyway: when we bought Shift we all knew which were its limits, and more or less we accepted them. To me the only important missing SW is a web browser (PIE or Opera ). Not absolute need for GPS, and I can say I could live even without phone-on-shift.
As always IMHO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to agree.
I bought the Shift as it was advertised, a UMPC with built in high speed wireless modem!
There is nothing wrong with people experimenting for developement to get more functionality out of it in a purely non-professional way, but as soon as people start demanding ROM's from enthusiasts (and treating them as if they get a warranty!) and complaining that the device is rubbish because it does not do something it was never marketed to do, then you know they have lost the plot.
Also, IMHO too..
I'm not!!!!
Specs: http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_xperia_x2-2926.php
It does look very sexy though http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_xperia_x2-3d-spin-2926.php
dude there is a neverending thread about this already
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=555651
spikegotti said:
dude there is a neverending thread about this already
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=555651
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i tried searching for one but it doesn't let me search for less than 3 characters or whatever ("X2").... not my fault
on second thought the vids i'm seeing on youtube show it's rather fast but i'm still not convinced by prototypes.....
Not unless they pay me for taking it and after that I'm going to sell it and buy a real modern device from a company that doesn't piss on its customers.
i wouldnt buy it even if the CPU was faster
comeradealexi said:
i wouldnt buy it even if the CPU was faster
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That crossed my mind as well haha.
orelsi said:
That crossed my mind as well haha.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol... said by a man who praises x1 over everything else. what an epic fail...
Unless it was cheaper, I cannot justify another $650 (family center discount) for much of the same.
if X2 2nd hand price for next 6 month is $300, i'll buy it . im still in love with my X1 now
vietdoan20062006
They need improvements on not only the CPU, but also the screen (AMOLED and larger).
What a retarded topic - like if it makes any difference if the CPU is faster (it's plenty fast enough already) or if some exotic display tech could only solve the problem of being resistive (AMOLED and similarly clueless idiocies)...
...it is Windows Mobile, dumbos, THAT IS THE PROBLEM, period.
It is not slow nor badly "coded" (like if SE or HTC has much to do with WM's root timing & kernel issues), it is simply Windows Mobile ergo it SUCKS.
Better than iCrap because it has multitasking and probably still has more apps (But who cares?) but worse in almost anything else.
Better than Android in hardware etc support and has more apps but worse in anything else.
Any other way it SUCKS compared to anyone else.
Yes, that's all.
szlevi said:
What a retarded topic - like if it makes any difference if the CPU is faster (it's plenty fast enough already) or if some exotic display tech could only solve the problem of being resistive (AMOLED and similarly clueless idiocies)...
...it is Windows Mobile, dumbos, THAT IS THE PROBLEM, period.
It is not slow nor badly "coded" (like if SE or HTC has much to do with WM's root timing & kernel issues), it is simply Windows Mobile ergo it SUCKS.
Better than iCrap because it has multitasking and probably still has more apps (But who cares?) but worse in almost anything else.
Better than Android in hardware etc support and has more apps but worse in anything else.
Any other way it SUCKS compared to anyone else.
Yes, that's all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excuse me? Better go get some brains before you make a joke of yourself on the Internetz.
1 - Having a better and faster CPU is the sole gole of both the manufacturers and the consumers. Are you kidding me? Faster CPU means, faster gameplay, movies. UI, multitasking and more. You just made the most ignorant claim in the history of the world.
The CPU is not fast enough and it is not the fault of the OS. You can tweak things only so far, after that, you need a faster CPU to take the load off.
2 - Lol wut? What has one to do with the other. AMOLED is good, because of the vivid colours and brightness.
FYI resistive is FAR, FAR superior to capacitive and if you didn't know that, you shouldn't post, only read, oh clueless one...
3 - Just because you can't handle the complexity of a certain OS, doesn't mean that the OS sucks. It mean thaat you don't have the skills and knowledge to appreciate it. WinMo is the most versatile, customizable and productive OS out there. Oh yeah, adding a "period" after your sentence doesn't magically turn it into the word of God...
Now GTFO and take your ignorance with you.
fight! fight!!!
sa7640 said:
They need improvements on not only the CPU, but also the screen (AMOLED and larger).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely. Even with a faster CPU it is still ugly as hell and the screen is not big enough. There are many other thing not to like as well. I wouldn't buy even if it had a faster CPU.
orelsi said:
u
3 - Just because you can't handle the complexity of a certain OS, doesn't mean that the OS sucks. It mean thaat you don't have the skills and knowledge to appreciate it. WinMo is the most versatile, customizable and productive OS out there. Oh yeah, adding a "period" after your sentence doesn't magically turn it into the word of God...
Now GTFO and take your ignorance with you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This one I have to agree!
i agree but i wont say customizable, the symbian platform is way more customizable than wm, everything on my P1 was changed, and i mean everything, and much easier to do so than on wm, but the symbian OS including the UIQ felt as though something was missing, apart from wm which is practically the same thing as windows on a comp except that its on a mobile device.
iphone os x is just as productive as wm now bcos of the developers who spend their time, you have to admit it, the iphone now is surpassing wm if it haven't, it seems as tho the wm developers have abandoned the wm platform...
i have emailed many developers about updating their apps and games for the wvga resolution and their response was nothing but bad news...
i agree this topic is useless only bcos of when it was published, why now when 6.5 is on the horizon???? ....shouldn't this be relevant when all we knew about was 6.1 which has the windows 98 appearance?
wm 6.5 in the latest builds is just as sexy as the iphone and android's gui, and the good part is that it seems to be more customizable than the two.
I wont buy X2 even they integrate 2Ghz CPU inside. There are no major improvements, i noticed only better camera and WM6.5 which you already can install to X1. Im happy with X1 now. IF i would buy new phone i would wait for something like HTC leo with QWERTY(TouchPro3 ?).
Does X2 even have G-sensor?
spikegotti said:
i agree but i wont say customizable, the symbian platform is way more customizable than wm, everything on my P1 was changed, and i mean everything, and much easier to do so than on wm, but the symbian OS including the UIQ felt as though something was missing, apart from wm which is practically the same thing as windows on a comp except that its on a mobile device........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree about most of those things. Symbian is still my second favourite OS, but I wouldn't put it on par with WinMo. It is a smartphone platform not a ppc one.
iPhail = CRAP.
matejdro said:
IF i would buy new phone i would wait for something like HTC leo with QWERTY(TouchPro3 ?).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yeah .
doministry said:
This one I have to agree!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I agree too. All Microsoft really has to do is make the buttons look larger and make the skin more modern (that is what they are doing on 6.5, but I'd rather have the 6.1 start menu as an option - at least newer builds make the 6.5 more easily customizable).
poetryrocksalot said:
Yes I agree too. All Microsoft really has to do is make the buttons look larger and make the skin more modern (that is what they are doing on 6.5, but I'd rather have the 6.1 start menu as an option - at least newer builds make the 6.5 more easily customizable).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed about the start menu.
Some things in 6.5 look weird or ugly to me, but as a whole I'm looking forward to it.
Anyway, I was thinking about getting a second device with another OS, just to try something else. I'll stick to WinMo for the next several years for sure, but maybe an Android or a Maemo device won't hurt anyone .
WM7 on the Touch HD?
Any news?
Too early to tell; but I am confident some chefs will be generous and courageous enough to try it
What i heard was that wm7 needed atleast 1ghz cpu and more rom/ram then the HD1 to function. So i think that it might be a bridge to far for the blackstone.
However i have to agree with habibjamil, there will probably be a few chefs who will give it a go
Given the amazing jobs these guys pull off already with whats available I'd say the sky's the limit. We'll just have to wait and see
I guess multi-touch is a core function in wm7.. So no go for HD1.
As long as Multi-Touch (or Pinch-to-Zoom) isn't required to boot we can run it. I mean, HTC Album 3.5 for the HD2 has Pinch-to-Zoom functionality, doesn't mean it doesn't run on the HD, you just can't zoom that easy.
Second off all, if Microsoft didn't change the 'idea' behind WinMo (multiple device support) there will be a driver layer that producers can change. These drivers will be changes (probably) but that might give us an angle to build a non-multi-touch driver. (All speculation though.)
mcdull said:
I guess multi-touch is a core function in wm7.. So no go for HD1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I tend to agree with the quote below. Yes 'the sky is the limit', not all functionality might work, but we will have to wait and see what does work. Android didn't run on the BlackStone either, but see how for they got (that's partially Open Source, but still).
bigdyl69 said:
Given the amazing jobs these guys pull off already with whats available I'd say the sky's the limit. We'll just have to wait and see
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if it will run, only time will tell. I think there is a chance it might work, but also a fair chance it won't boot. It's all up to Microsoft what the OS checks for when it boots and what we can change.
To early to tell. No point guessing. My gut tells me that a number of chefs will have a go, though my head tells me that it may not be possibly for a number of reasons.
HD doesn't have multi-touch
HD doesn't have 1ghz cpu
But this doesn't mean that some things couldn't be taken from WM7 and brought to the HD
We'll just have to wait and see. Until then, this thread is rather pointless as no phones exist with wm7 yet
Thread closed
Does anyone remember the video adobe put up demonstrating flash on g1? It's a video of kevin lynch showing flash 10 working what seems to be flawlessly on the g1, more than a year ago!
link--->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YT__RDRVb4c
just a couple days ago cm6 got released and its running beautifully on my "old bed-ridden" so why not flash? i'm no developer but there must be a way to make flash specifically for g1's or mytough 3g's, after all the video is living proof. hopefully a developer can take the flash app from another phone running froyo and work their magic on it to make it work on our devices. c'mon devs keep the g1 alive
It really is heartbreaking..
Seeing this video makes me remember why I was bragging to Iphone users that have no flash what-so-ever... I remember this video now and I guess the G1 has the flash capabilities but, the app that adobe released is coded to only work on Froyo and Snapdragon devices.
I think their plan is to get us all to upgrade to the newer snapdragons or soon to be dual core snapdragons... Man I hate how technology ages.
Well from the sounds of it the Flash that is available now and to the public for Android Phones won't work on the older processors of the G1 and such. In it's current form anyways.
People keep throwing around that Flash is "not possible" on the G1 and I just don't buy it. I'm no developer and I'm sure it's not easy, but I don't for a second believe it's "not possible."
I could however believe that it just isn't worth it. But that's totally different. It'd be nice to hear a dev say they don't want to bother with the headache and that it would just be too large an undertaking rather than just hear that it's "not possible."
It is possible it however is not probable. As flash isn't open source it would have to be backwards engineered(unreasonable amount of effort) and recompiled for the arm6 architecture..far to much effort for something that would function questionably..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@Blackman778g
yea definitely agreed, but i don't see why not someone can screw around with a couple of files or code or whatever developers do and recompile to operate on older devices, or devices with different hardware. sure it's probably not gonna be an easy task, but if we can get a whole operating system that's suppose to cripple the **** out of our hardware, why not just an app? sense has done it, not in a specifically good way but it can maybe spark hope?
@dezvous
yea it'd be pretty sweet for someone to take a jab at it, and personally i believe the "it wont work with our processors" is a load of bs, because i think the phone in the link is running cupcake, which underclocks the g1 at 386 and it looks perfectly fine. now-a-days we can get to 725mhz without jacking up your battery, i run 614 and i just sit and watch it fly
@ftruck90
yea thats true, but it'll be cool to see someone try
why not dump adobe flash alltogether and work on an open source flash replacement, there's one available for linux, i think its called GNUFlash or something..
ps: i think this was already mentioned somewhere else on xda..
here you go...
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/
Cyanogen has told us full flash will never work on G1. However, there's a think tank for getting flash lite to run in Froyo.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=7177455
Flash not working is not bs.
Flash as it is now was built for a certain processor architecture (The G1 has Arm6 where flash was built to run on Arm7). Its like saying that its BS that I can't run software built to run on PowerPC on a x86 processor. The PowerPC processor has different instruction sets that the x86 does not.
We need an open source mobile flash alternative.
That we could try to recompile for our devices and build a plugin around it.
Or someone disassembles the curreent flash froma dobe and recompiles it for Arm7...wich i don't think is possible.
i dont understand something. everytime i see one of these flash topics, every1 says it was never compiled to run on arm6 and everything else.... but how did this video come to life? OVER A YEAR AGO. that video is flash, running on a g1, pretty solidly too. and i mean...whats that...cupcake?
that video is pretty incriminating stuff if you ask me. adobe got some explaining to do.
but...if CM says it cant be done, i'll believe him.
CM said it can't be done (with the adobe flash)
What you saw was a (probably unstable?) version of flash compiled by adobe probably as a testrun on the G1.
Adobe CAN compile it for the G1 IF they want to.
What we can do in the meantime is ask adobe to compile flash for the Arm6 and hope that it'll make enough rucus for them to notice.
havikx said:
i dont understand something. everytime i see one of these flash topics, every1 says it was never compiled to run on arm6 and everything else.... but how did this video come to life? OVER A YEAR AGO. that video is flash, running on a g1, pretty solidly too. and i mean...whats that...cupcake?
that video is pretty incriminating stuff if you ask me. adobe got some explaining to do.
but...if CM says it cant be done, i'll believe him.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.that video could very well not be legit lots of companies release mocked up videos as ads
2.if it was real adobe have the source code for flash as it's their product so they very well may of compiled a version for arm6 and never released it. But as its not open source that means exactly zero to us. The argument isn't that it's impossible to run flash on this processor it's that it is impossible to run current releases of flash on it
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mr.johnsexydavis911 said:
@Blackman778g
yea definitely agreed, but i don't see why not someone can screw around with a couple of files or code or whatever developers do and recompile to operate on older devices, or devices with different hardware. sure it's probably not gonna be an easy task, but if we can get a whole operating system that's suppose to cripple the **** out of our hardware, why not just an app? sense has done it, not in a specifically good way but it can maybe spark hope?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, you obviously aren't a dev. Here's the basic version. Programs these days are written in a more human readable format (called "source") and compiled into a format the computer can understand. Most compilers build for a specific CPU type, and the code they generate won't run on anything else. Interpreted languages like BASIC, Python, and Java either don't really get compiled, or get compiled to a neutral format called "bytecode". Then you need a CPU specific app to run the source or bytecode.
Flash is a bytecode language. That's why it can run on so many platforms. The problem is the bytecode interpeter. That's proprietary code that Adobe wrote and has not released the source for. It's also native CPU code, so it's compiled for a specific CPU family. Which is a somewhat retarded thing to do on a platform like Android, but they probably did it for performance reasons. Though with a working JIT, I imagine a Java based version would work. Adobe has never been known for writing very efficient code.
Now, the Flash runtime engine was compiled for a different CPU type than the one we have in G1, MT3G, and others. In order for the Adobe code to work with our devices Adobe would have to compile it for us. Or give us source code, which they will likely never do. Or we could try to write an emulator to fake the CPU type differences, but those are SLOW. The rule of thumb is you have to have a CPU 10x as powerful as the CPU you are emulating. Our CPU is slower than the one we would need to emulate.
Another option is to attempt to do dynamic compilation on the binary to translate it to our CPU architecture. This is an incredibly complex undertaking and is rarely attempted. There are just too many things to go wrong with this sort of thing. In this particular case, the existing code is close to the same architecture, so it might be a little easier, but it's still very difficult. You have to translate every instruction at the machine code level and account for differences in the available instructions, registers, size of data fields, CPU cache, RAM size, and various other side-effects that are not obvious at first glance. The devs here are good, but this is the sort of thing that billion dollar companies try and fail at. It's a LOT harder than it looks.
If you want flash, learn to dev and work on one of the open source Flash engines to try to get it up to snuff. Then try to optimize it to run well on our low end CPU and RAM starved machines. By then we'll likely be running dual or quad 3Ghz ARM12 phones.
has any1 tried contacting adobe about it?
Dead platform. Probably not worth their time and money to compile on ARMv6. As ttabbal stated above, by the time any of these solutions come to fruition, we'll probably all have upgraded.
I would say its definitly worth adobes or a devs time and money. Because even tho g1s are getting old. I would still pay 20 or 30 bucks just to download a nice operating flash player for the g1 off the market. There's so much money in it. Its sick. That dev would be rich fo sure!!!!!
sent from my superfroyo dream
dead platform
Ok, in the last 4 weeks over a million Phone with android and ARM 6 processors were sold world wide. So I would say that Adobe may listen.
It took adobe SEVERAL YEARS to support AMD64, and that was with the entire world nagging them about it several times every day, and it is an ADVANCEMENT from intel32.
Adobe is just a bloated hog, they are COMPLETELY out of touch with consumers, selling you the JUNK that they WANT to sell you and not the product that YOU WANT to buy from them.
To be honest though, LET FLASH DIE. I don't want flash on my phone, or, for that matter, even on my desktop. It doesn't offer ANYTHING that is even REMOTELY useful.
dhkr123 said:
It took adobe SEVERAL YEARS to support AMD64, and that was with the entire world nagging them about it several times every day, and it is an ADVANCEMENT from intel32.
Adobe is just a bloated hog, they are COMPLETELY out of touch with consumers, selling you the JUNK that they WANT to sell you and not the product that YOU WANT to buy from them.
To be honest though, LET FLASH DIE. I don't want flash on my phone, or, for that matter, even on my desktop. It doesn't offer ANYTHING that is even REMOTELY useful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Is there any way we can make this thread disappear? I don't want another necromancer to appear after Gingerbread drops and people go nutso there too.
Is it possible a Windows Phone 7 ROM for Topaz?
In the conference, seems WP7 is pretty amazing...
From what I understand, our phones don't have enough horsepower to run WP7. Gotta have at least a 1ghz processor. There are other requirements also but I can't remember them.
yeah true, but do we really need 1ghz. There is always the option, that most topaz users, would not want the entire OS, rather few things from it. Then i dont think we need 1GHZ.
What do you think?
I think the 1GHz and 576mb RAM is needed for Xbox life.Those new HTC phones will play most of Xbox360 games http://www.htc.com/europe/product/7trophy/overview.html
With ours Htc diamonds 2 we can't play xbox game ,but i think all other parts from os will be operating normally like as wm6.5.
user212 said:
I think the 1GHz and 576mb RAM is needed for Xbox life.Those new HTC phones will play most of Xbox360 games http://www.htc.com/europe/product/7trophy/overview.html
With ours Htc diamonds 2 we can't play xbox game ,but i think all other parts from os will be operating normally like as wm6.5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think you will be able to play 360 games in WM7, you can access and update information on your xbox live account, and talk to friends, etc, but you wont be able to play your 360 games on your phone, windows phone 7 has its own games coming to it....
lilg_06 said:
I don't think you will be able to play 360 games in WM7, you can access and update information on your xbox live account, and talk to friends, etc, but you wont be able to play your 360 games on your phone, windows phone 7 has its own games coming to it....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe,but watch the trailer for HTC HD7 ,there the show real game play maybe i'm wrong ,but think about it.Sony has portable console -PSP ,but Xbox doesn't so, with those phone with those parameters Xbox have a portable console and it's on your phone ,but we will see when someone buy one of those HTC with wm7 and will share his experience
It's been answered many times in main WP7 thread, strict hardware requirements are needed more, if performance is not a matter, there must exist another WP7 device with a similar Qualcomm MSM7200 platform to extract drivers from.
The simple answer is NO and I really doubt there would be one.
Drakh said:
It's been answered many times in main WP7 thread, strict hardware requirements are needed more, if performance is not a matter, there must exist another WP7 device with a similar Qualcomm MSM7200 platform to extract drivers from.
The simple answer is NO and I really doubt there would be one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must say by the standart no....But I know that the wp7 UI seems a low ram eater. We just need some awesome hackers that extract the basic rom and place all the features except for some like the xbox part in a rom we could use. Manilla 2.5 or sense was developed for hd2 and where using it. I beleive ut could be done. I think this requirements where made to bring the best of the phone and don't be stuck behind the lame and false publisity of the iphone.
...just we have to wait for WM7 kitchen...
i-PDA2006 said:
Is it possible a Windows Phone 7 ROM for Topaz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is and I'm sure that will be a WM7 ROM for Topaz.
Of course, it could be better to have 1GHz processor but don't forget that Topaz can be safely overclocked to about 700 MHz and also don't forget that there are a lot of marketing reasons to NOT encourage porting WM7 on older mobile phones.
Sorry for bring up an old thread. Just wanna say something.
From a developer standpoint nothing is completely impossible. If someone were to make a direct port from WP7 to a slower device with less ram then some modifications will need to be done to it. This could mean leaving some parts of wp7 out (which may cause instability to applications that require those features) or developing a custom version of a system file for use in WP7 for the phone in question (also may cause instability if the programmer doesn't know what he/she's doing). Obviously it's not a simple "cut and paste" from WM to WP7.
Also, I have already tried to extract a NBH rom with WP7 on it in a WM rom extractor, just to test and see if the format was the same. The formats are different. They have differences in their sections so any normal WM boot loader wouldn't be able to load a WP7 rom in a WM rom format. A solution would probably be to flash a new boot loader to support WP7 roms however this is dangerous and has a very high risk of bricking your device (after all, the one thing that can really save you from bricking your device is your boot load to flash a new rom, so messing with the boot loader itself can do your device in for good unless you have a backup boot loader just lying around).
Take these words into consideration if you're working on a port.
MoshPuiu said:
Yes, it is and I'm sure that will be a WM7 ROM for Topaz.
Of course, it could be better to have 1GHz processor but don't forget that Topaz can be safely overclocked to about 700 MHz and also don't forget that there are a lot of marketing reasons to NOT encourage porting WM7 on older mobile phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could You pls share link to thread where are info regarding safety overclocking for Topaz mobile? Thanks.
mtucek said:
Could You pls share link to thread where are info regarding safety overclocking for Topaz mobile? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just search for OCT 1.5
INFO
hmm Actually, you dont NEED a 1ghz processor, however you need a v7 instruction capable processor. TOPAZ has a v6 one, so its a no go.
On the other hand, if devs could get their hands on a the source code, remove the xbox live and strip high-requirement features then make the rom available on it should work, however WP7 was written to take advantage of v7 technology.
michalis95 said:
hmm Actually, you dont NEED a 1ghz processor, however you need a v7 instruction capable processor. TOPAZ has a v6 one, so its a no go.
On the other hand, if devs could get their hands on a the source code, remove the xbox live and strip high-requirement features then make the rom available on it should work, however WP7 was written to take advantage of v7 technology.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to read
Is windows phone 7 still not possible for Topaz?
the1980ar said:
Is windows phone 7 still not possible for Topaz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it is not possible as MS need different hardware for WP and WM devices does not fit in there except the HD2 (I love my HD2 for this).
But I dont have a HD2 and only have TD2 at present. OK I will have to stay with WinMO 6.5 till I get a new WP7 mobile
Thank you all.