I don't really feel like when I am using my phone that it is running slow. I actually decided to run a linpack and quadrant test because I saw someone on here getting 5 something MFLOPS and a 700 something on the Quadrant and I thought my phone would out preform when in all actuality I didn't come close... I am running AOSP's newest version of Gingerbread with Darktremor's latest version of Apps2SD and kifno's Build.prop v0.8. So does anyone know what I might have done wrong or what I can do to help improve my phones speed?
Thanks in advance for any and all help offered.
PS. I have my phone overclocked to 768 MHz with SetCPU.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Anything much over 475 on quadrant is a dream. Whoever said that they got 700+ is a liar, and you can tell them I said so.
-----
Sent from my CDMA Hero. I got some hot Froyo-on-Hero action here!
I feel quad scores are useless in telling how quickly your phone feels to you.
The second you run a quad score test... is the second you think your phone is slow.
Also I've seen some people suggest that a recent update to quadrant made everyones scores go down... I have not personally used it, just reporting what I've heard.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Benchmarks are useless. Also, the Hero is almost 3 year old tech.
user7618 said:
Anything much over 475 on quadrant is a dream. Whoever said that they got 700+ is a liar, and you can tell them I said so.
-----
Sent from my CDMA Hero. I got some hot Froyo-on-Hero action here!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't care for benchmark scores, but some do. But when testing something out on mine I had 635 in quadrant. I'm sure I could have made some more changes and gotten it higher, but to me it ran just as fast as my pre-testing state.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Have you set up a task Killer? Don't troll at me but I firmly believe it helps my phone run, but i have noticed AOSP's gingerbread is a step down in speed from the Froyo Rom
tric3ur said:
Have you set up a task Killer? Don't troll at me but I firmly believe it helps my phone run, but i have noticed AOSP's gingerbread is a step down in speed from the Froyo Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using either of the cm6 roms either 6.1 or 6.2 will give you better scores. I have noticed that my fps on a sense rom are better than with cm6. If you want higher scores go with anything that isn't sense based. Personally I run cm6.1 as I was having some issues with text messages not coming through on 6.2.
Related
Did anyone has 3200 in their Quadrant with CM RC6??? I saw the screen shot in CM's website...
IF someone has the score, can I have the config??
Why do you need a benchmark to tell you that your phone is fast?
actually I don't need it, but just kinda curious about the magnificent score! XD
it was fake cyanogen said quadrant is easy to hack after he posted that
Ohhhh ok that's why it sounds familiar.
Check this one out: (by @JAguirre1231)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
wdfowty said:
Ohhhh ok that's why it sounds familiar.
Check this one out: (by @JAguirre1231)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMFG, ITS OVER 9000!!!!!!!!
From Cyanogen's twitter:
To get that result, I just mounted a tmpfs over Quadrant's data dirs. It's a good benchmark but easy to "cheat" at.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
McFroger3 said:
OMFG, ITS OVER 9000!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
10char
McFroger3 said:
OMFG, ITS OVER 9000!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha
/10chars
soooo...
that's a hack >.<
I thought it was true or so...
Yup. You can spoof almost all the benchmark programs.
I used to be all about benchmarks, but it's just a number and doesn't really represent all that is taking place under the hood. Benchmarks are nice, but it's not something you should get too obsessed with.
wdfowty said:
Yup. You can spoof almost all the benchmark programs.
I used to be all about benchmarks, but it's just a number and doesn't really represent all that is taking place under the hood. Benchmarks are nice, but it's not something you should get too obsessed with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thx 4 d wise word ^^
No problem man.
You have one of the most advanced pieces of mobile technology to date. Use it wisely
Happy hacking!
my friends with Samsung Galaxy S is getting on my nerves by screenshooting their 2100 quadrant score >.<
flamechamp said:
my friends with Samsung Galaxy S is getting on my nerves by screenshooting their 2100 quadrant score >.<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, who cares who has a higher benchmark. Its not really noticeably fast at all. They both go the same speeds in menus and what not, only if you were playing a 3d game would you really see a difference.
The basic reason that the Galaxy S scores higher in Quadrant is the more advanced SGX graphics processor.
yeah, in the graphic test(2d n 3d) the SGS outnumbered N1 up to 20 FPS??
I want to get a faster running phone. I have rooted my captivate, install one click lag fix and setcpu, my quadrant score is running at about 1800 continuiosly. I'm not sure what I can do next to make it faster will it still being safe. Thank you for your help.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Your quadrant is not an accurate depiction of speed. You want faster flash a 2.2 rom then flash oc kernel. But from your set up description I would suggest allot of reading and allot of questions before you start
I mean no offense, you want a fast phone, not a dead one
mcord11758 said:
Your quadrant is not an accurate depiction of speed. You want faster flash a 2.2 rom then flash oc kernel. But from your set up description I would suggest allot of reading and allot of questions before you start
I mean no offense, you want a fast phone, not a dead one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 rom 2.2 + lagfix is enough for me.
ZakyJak said:
I want to get a faster running phone. I have rooted my captivate, install one click lag fix and setcpu, my quadrant score is running at about 1800 continuiosly. I'm not sure what I can do next to make it faster will it still being safe. Thank you for your help.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 on reading up...There is soooo much to take into account on what you have to do with your phone..to get it all to work right...Sometimes you get lucky and everything melds properly...other times you don't..and get nothing but instability...Mostly though...it's all trial and error finding what works best for your phone...since no 2 are 100% alike..
Mac
Ok, so where would I start? I have some very basic knowledge of roms and flash.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Sent you a pm
Why would you create another thread on the same subject?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=922075
Reported for lock.
With android 2.1 and ext2 with 1.2ghz I was getting 2300 to 2400 quad score
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
yokozuna82 said:
With android 2.1 and ext2 with 1.2ghz I was getting 2300 to 2400 quad score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ext2?
and what did you use to o/c?
yokozuna82 said:
With android 2.1 and ext2 with 1.2ghz I was getting 2300 to 2400 quad score
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people were hitting 2400-2800 with that set up, and it had WAYYYYY more lag that the ex4 fixes now that score like 1400-1700 lol.
Double Thread, Locked
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I'm quite interested on quadrant score of any android device.
to get quadrant score, go market and download quadrant standard.
Please post yous score right here and state down your clock speed and whether your device is with custom rom and overclock.
This is my result.
Nexus s, cm7.
3500 @ 1ghz.
4000 @ 1.3ghz
Thanks!
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App
Meh, you can make a quadrant do what you want. They are meaningless.
Firmware with a lower index in the Quadrant is often a reality faster. I long ago ceased to enjoy this program.
The highest scores are MİUİ series phones. I think.
Quadrant isn't fun anymore. I could post my score, but that would be a lie, since it takes a little or no effort to manipulate the result
HTC Incredible
MIUI 1.6.24
Kernel: Chad's 2.38.8 6-19
Kernel Frequency: 128 - 998
Governor: smartass
Quadrant 1: 1235
Quadrant 2: 1396
Quadrant 3: 1453
Fiiiiine. Here's my results without cheating:
Desire HD - MIUI 1.6.24 - Stock kernel @ 1,5GHz
- Score 1: 3220
- Score 2: 3330
- Score 3: 3364
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
BazookaAce said:
Fiiiiine. Here's my results without cheating:
Desire HD - MIUI 1.6.24 - Stock kernel @ 1,5GHz
- Score 1: 3220
- Score 2: 3330
- Score 3: 3364
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Add blocking isn't built in that rom?
Nexus S OC 1.2 ghz UV~ 25 across the board... MIUI 1.6.24
Sent from my NS (no it's NOT SNS or GNS)
boborone said:
Add blocking isn't built in that rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not in the one i'm using (MIUI.us), but i think some other MIUI builds have it.
Gah... I use quadrant to help my colleague pick lotto numbers. We won £5, and will now buy 5 more tickets, using *ahem* benchmark scores... oh wait, I mean pseudo random numbers
For what it's worth.
My INC gets 1500s.
My NC gets anywhere from 2500-3100s.
pulser_g2 said:
Gah... I use quadrant to help my colleague pick lotto numbers. We won £5, and will now buy 5 more tickets, using *ahem* benchmark scores... oh wait, I mean pseudo random numbers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My second c++ program was a random number generator. Quadrant is the most successful rannumgen. Hats off. Hahaha.
Hello all
i ran a quadrent benchmark on my Thrill (rooted /w Thriller) and i scored a 1850 on my benchmark, unacceptable!
i started playing around with my build.prop file and was able to bring the benchmark up to 2856. i was just wondering what others out there are getting on their scores?
i have a friend with a modded out Atrix and his benchmark was 3500, however he is OC to 3ghz. i achived my 2800 benchmark undervolting my proc....just wait until the thrill can OC the proc, it's gonna make for some pretty impressive benchmarks..
please post benchmark results here. ill post up mine as soon as i can.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Here its mine, running slim froyo.
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Here's mine. Stock, Unrooted and a lot of Widgets running. Have seen 2800 before.
Sent from my LG-P925 using XDA App
Let's try that again.
Sent from my LG-P925 using XDA App
Here are mines
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
And this one I thing a used a o3d rom
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
What did you modify to get ur quadrant up?
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
quadrant
I get like 2800 to 3100 on thriller rom, on my strictly I was getting like 3600 on cherry pie rom oc @ only like 1.2 ghz, I would like to overclock this thing and see the potential, although 3100 is pretty darn good, I really haven't done all that much to it besides the rooting and flashing of thriller, I have lunar ui theme running but that doesn't change my benchmark score. Yeah this phone is fast enough for me
tedjacob10 said:
I get like 2800 to 3100 on thriller rom, on my strictly I was getting like 3600 on cherry pie rom oc @ only like 1.2 ghz, I would like to overclock this thing and see the potential, although 3100 is pretty darn good, I really haven't done all that much to it besides the rooting and flashing of thriller, I have lunar ui theme running but that doesn't change my benchmark score. Yeah this phone is fast enough for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
looks like the O3D rom worked out pretty well i dont think i have seen anything over what i posted. the only thing holding back the thrills benchmark is the inablilty to overclock. with that said, i fully agree this phone is plenty fast for me. the only complaint i have is that i cannot over clock, but that will come with time.
Hello,
I'm curious as to the stock voltage of the captivate's CPU at 1Ghz. I've done some searching, and can't find it anywhere (maybe I'm looking in all the wrong places)
Because my 24/7 setup is:
Cyanogenmod 7
Launcher7
Glitch v13.1 kernel
1.4Ghz @ 1.325v
1.3Ghz @ 1.275v
1.2Ghz @ 1.25
1Ghz @ 1.2v
stock down the board from here
I/O scheduler: noop
Conservative governor
I'm just curious as to how much damage I'm doing to the chip, I'm not sure if 1.275v is the stock 1Ghz, just came here to check.
Thanks
(With the phone at 1.4 and running cyanogenmod, it absolutely screams, scores >2700 points in quadrant. It's no sgs2, but it holds its own)
1ghz stock is 1275mV
Here you go with all the defaults
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thanks guys
I remember reading somewhere that 1300mv was the max safe voltage.
mrhaley30705 said:
I remember reading somewhere that 1300mv was the max safe voltage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you source that for me? I normally run 1.325 for 1.4
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Fear of Oneself said:
Could you source that for me? I normally run 1.325 for 1.4
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I heard from someone else that told me where he heard it. I don't know where you might be able to find official documentation on it. You could always email Samsung.
Technically anything past 1275mV and you are shortening the life expectancy. Don't really need to know much more than that. Simple rule about OC any device. More voltage and/or heat the more you kill the life of it. Since no one knows "that" number per device it comes down to how much you are willing to gamble on it.
prbassplayer said:
Technically anything past 1275mV and you are shortening the life expectancy. Don't really need to know much more than that. Simple rule about OC any device. More voltage and/or heat the more you kill the life of it. Since no one knows "that" number per device it comes down to how much you are willing to gamble on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. Electromigration would take years on the 40 (or 45, I forget) nanometer chip, especially if it does not maintain that clock constantly. And temperature remains at hand because it only peaks at 1.4 in short bursts.
Thanks for the reply, I think I'll just keep it where I have it and not go any higher.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App