Database Develop

3200 Quadrant score in RC3??

Did anyone has 3200 in their Quadrant with CM RC6??? I saw the screen shot in CM's website...
IF someone has the score, can I have the config??

Why do you need a benchmark to tell you that your phone is fast?

actually I don't need it, but just kinda curious about the magnificent score! XD

it was fake cyanogen said quadrant is easy to hack after he posted that

Ohhhh ok that's why it sounds familiar.
Check this one out: (by @JAguirre1231)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

wdfowty said:
Ohhhh ok that's why it sounds familiar.
Check this one out: (by @JAguirre1231)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMFG, ITS OVER 9000!!!!!!!!

From Cyanogen's twitter:
To get that result, I just mounted a tmpfs over Quadrant's data dirs. It's a good benchmark but easy to "cheat" at.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

McFroger3 said:
OMFG, ITS OVER 9000!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
10char

McFroger3 said:
OMFG, ITS OVER 9000!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha
/10chars

soooo...
that's a hack >.<
I thought it was true or so...

Yup. You can spoof almost all the benchmark programs.
I used to be all about benchmarks, but it's just a number and doesn't really represent all that is taking place under the hood. Benchmarks are nice, but it's not something you should get too obsessed with.

wdfowty said:
Yup. You can spoof almost all the benchmark programs.
I used to be all about benchmarks, but it's just a number and doesn't really represent all that is taking place under the hood. Benchmarks are nice, but it's not something you should get too obsessed with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thx 4 d wise word ^^

No problem man.
You have one of the most advanced pieces of mobile technology to date. Use it wisely
Happy hacking!

my friends with Samsung Galaxy S is getting on my nerves by screenshooting their 2100 quadrant score >.<

flamechamp said:
my friends with Samsung Galaxy S is getting on my nerves by screenshooting their 2100 quadrant score >.<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, who cares who has a higher benchmark. Its not really noticeably fast at all. They both go the same speeds in menus and what not, only if you were playing a 3d game would you really see a difference.

The basic reason that the Galaxy S scores higher in Quadrant is the more advanced SGX graphics processor.

yeah, in the graphic test(2d n 3d) the SGS outnumbered N1 up to 20 FPS??

[Q] I feel like my Hero's performance should be better...

I don't really feel like when I am using my phone that it is running slow. I actually decided to run a linpack and quadrant test because I saw someone on here getting 5 something MFLOPS and a 700 something on the Quadrant and I thought my phone would out preform when in all actuality I didn't come close... I am running AOSP's newest version of Gingerbread with Darktremor's latest version of Apps2SD and kifno's Build.prop v0.8. So does anyone know what I might have done wrong or what I can do to help improve my phones speed?
Thanks in advance for any and all help offered.
PS. I have my phone overclocked to 768 MHz with SetCPU.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Anything much over 475 on quadrant is a dream. Whoever said that they got 700+ is a liar, and you can tell them I said so.
-----
Sent from my CDMA Hero. I got some hot Froyo-on-Hero action here!

I feel quad scores are useless in telling how quickly your phone feels to you.
The second you run a quad score test... is the second you think your phone is slow.

Also I've seen some people suggest that a recent update to quadrant made everyones scores go down... I have not personally used it, just reporting what I've heard.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App

Benchmarks are useless. Also, the Hero is almost 3 year old tech.

user7618 said:
Anything much over 475 on quadrant is a dream. Whoever said that they got 700+ is a liar, and you can tell them I said so.
-----
Sent from my CDMA Hero. I got some hot Froyo-on-Hero action here!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't care for benchmark scores, but some do. But when testing something out on mine I had 635 in quadrant. I'm sure I could have made some more changes and gotten it higher, but to me it ran just as fast as my pre-testing state.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App

Have you set up a task Killer? Don't troll at me but I firmly believe it helps my phone run, but i have noticed AOSP's gingerbread is a step down in speed from the Froyo Rom

tric3ur said:
Have you set up a task Killer? Don't troll at me but I firmly believe it helps my phone run, but i have noticed AOSP's gingerbread is a step down in speed from the Froyo Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using either of the cm6 roms either 6.1 or 6.2 will give you better scores. I have noticed that my fps on a sense rom are better than with cm6. If you want higher scores go with anything that isn't sense based. Personally I run cm6.1 as I was having some issues with text messages not coming through on 6.2.

[Q] Stock Captivate voltage

Hello,
I'm curious as to the stock voltage of the captivate's CPU at 1Ghz. I've done some searching, and can't find it anywhere (maybe I'm looking in all the wrong places)
Because my 24/7 setup is:
Cyanogenmod 7
Launcher7
Glitch v13.1 kernel
1.4Ghz @ 1.325v
1.3Ghz @ 1.275v
1.2Ghz @ 1.25
1Ghz @ 1.2v
stock down the board from here
I/O scheduler: noop
Conservative governor
I'm just curious as to how much damage I'm doing to the chip, I'm not sure if 1.275v is the stock 1Ghz, just came here to check.
Thanks
(With the phone at 1.4 and running cyanogenmod, it absolutely screams, scores >2700 points in quadrant. It's no sgs2, but it holds its own)

1ghz stock is 1275mV

Here you go with all the defaults
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Thanks guys

I remember reading somewhere that 1300mv was the max safe voltage.

mrhaley30705 said:
I remember reading somewhere that 1300mv was the max safe voltage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you source that for me? I normally run 1.325 for 1.4
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App

Fear of Oneself said:
Could you source that for me? I normally run 1.325 for 1.4
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I heard from someone else that told me where he heard it. I don't know where you might be able to find official documentation on it. You could always email Samsung.

Technically anything past 1275mV and you are shortening the life expectancy. Don't really need to know much more than that. Simple rule about OC any device. More voltage and/or heat the more you kill the life of it. Since no one knows "that" number per device it comes down to how much you are willing to gamble on it.

prbassplayer said:
Technically anything past 1275mV and you are shortening the life expectancy. Don't really need to know much more than that. Simple rule about OC any device. More voltage and/or heat the more you kill the life of it. Since no one knows "that" number per device it comes down to how much you are willing to gamble on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. Electromigration would take years on the 40 (or 45, I forget) nanometer chip, especially if it does not maintain that clock constantly. And temperature remains at hand because it only peaks at 1.4 in short bursts.
Thanks for the reply, I think I'll just keep it where I have it and not go any higher.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App

new quadrant scores on old stones and droids

I haven't been using my stone for a while now, but upon running latest Quadrant I was kind of surprised by the low CPU score of only 348. I clearly remember getting more on this benchmark.
Can anyone post some screenshots of their stones (or droids) and the ROM they are using?
I am using CM 7.2.2
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

I'm also using CM7.2.2 with 2nd boot and 512MB swap partition
Code:
swap on swap off
Similar overall score - but totally different CPU and I/O ratings.
Strange...
Edit:
Result on the right side taken without swap partition.
Seems to really impact I/O

Yeah swap is great. You can even run more demanding games since this old PowerVR can still put some decent performance. I tried NOVA1, PES 2012, Dead Space and Temple Run. They all run great compared to my Xperia mini pro. The only difference is the occasional lag from swapping, but I think class 10 card will improve on this. Will try later.
I ran the Antutu benchmark and I got very low FPU score while the CPU score is normal. I thought maybe its some glitch with the latest CM7 so I flashed 4 older version, but no improvement. So far I tried 7.2.2, 7.2.1, 7.2.0 and 7-20012007. Its all the same. Its not only the score that worries me its also the choppines when scrolling through home screens, when entering drawer etc. Something is wrong. I will try stock rom later and I will try to change the OR maybe it has something to do with it.

That FPU score is probably normal. I get the same (159-162) on both CM7 and CM10. On CM10 2D rendering gets low scores - about 280 while on CM7 it is over 400. Database score seems low. On CeBits results CPU is low, I've been getting over 1300 (on quadrant) on both CM7 and CM10 (stock (kabaldan's stock) overclock values).

Done and done. I flashed vulnerable CFT with RSD Lite, formated the SD card, reinstalled OR3.3 and flashed the new CM7.2 with swap support. Its fine now. I don't know why it didn't fix itself with reflashing CM7 roms, but it didn't. Maybe it was the old OR that was causing problems I don't know.

cm-7-20121007-UNOFFICIAL-umts_sholes
Compcache RAM 18%

thanks for your results!

Antutu World Record for P970 - 5031 points

How It is posible to get up to 5000 points in Antutu ?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Maximum what I can get on Strong Accord Kernel with V30B is only 3801 points
But here I can see this is probalby on CM10 (Im not sure) but which Kernel ?

1adamek said:
How It is posible to get up to 5000 points in Antutu ?
Maximum what I can get on Strong Accord Kernel with V30B is only 3801 points
But here I can see this is probalby on CM10 (Im not sure) but which Kernel ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got over 10,000 on my galaxy victroy.
Sent from my SPH-L300 using Tapatalk 2

Is not important how much you got, but how to get 5000 points on P970 ?

1adamek said:
Is not important how much you got, but how to get 5000 points on P970 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Easy: find a kernel that will work with your P970 and flash it to your phone. Then overclock your phone. You should get 5000.

Official record from xda forum for P970 is 4109
Hellmanor record, he overlock graphic card and procesor to maxiumum, So what I can tell you it is not so easy.

4.1.2, its CM10 i guess.
Maybe disable all apps and run only Antutu. lol

1adamek said:
Official record from xda forum for P970 is 4109
Hellmanor record, he overlock graphic card and procesor to maxiumum, So what I can tell you it is not so easy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. It is easy. You overclock it and if that does not yeild enough performance you can edit your build.prop file.
Why do ask for help just to end up telling me you know how to do it?
Do what you like. I'm not able to help you any more.
Sent from my SPH-L300 using Tapatalk 2

So this means the record is not real performance of Optimus Black. This record is a Fake

For the nexus 4, It's proved that benchmark scores are more when the phone is kept in a freezer....maybe the same case here, but such a large difference isn't possible...

Is there kernel which overclocks to 1100mhz in cm10.1?
If it doesn't, it is fake
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda app-developers app

Yes it is Zero Gravity Kernel.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2082740
Score is from official Antutu ranking list. So score is real one but the way to get that performance is kind of cheat. Or tricky way of combine performance from strong accord kernel and zero gravity.

I can submit any score, there is a way...I hope its real. I also looking for stable oc kernel for cm10.1..

Highest I ever got was 4100.5031 is just horse****.Unless someone managed to over clock like crazy
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 4 Beta