Hi all,
Any logical reason why Froyo would be smoother, faster, etc, than gingerbread on my particular hero.
I have tried most if not all the variations. Fresh installs, etc.
Currently using AOSP Froyo.
Not a big deal, just curious that's all.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA Premium App
I think it has to do with the gingerbread builds not including as many graphics and general performance tweaks as the final froyo builds. I think devs are still working on overall stability first. Once it's stable I think we'll start seeing performance get better.
Aosp froyo probably ran the best on my phone to date. I'm currently using CM7 and am enjoying it, but have had a few minor issues; blank black screen coming up, though not lately, market issues and my battery life doesn't seem as good as it was on aosp froyo. Aside from that it really does run well. CM recently released CM7.02 which I put on my phone this morning. I haven't been using it long enough to notice any difference. My wife's phone still has aosp froyo on it and I may or may not update it to gingerbread.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Thanks, I was just wondering if many other people were seeing this.
Can't really see that GB has any significant advantage on the hardware limited hero. Although, it is fun to run something that was never ment to run on our phones.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA Premium App
Related
When will it happen? Im not a fan of cyanogen, I've tried gb and it runs great, id just like to know if its ever gonna just be google again
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
As said in probably 50 other threads, aosp will eventually do it. He's using cyanogen to get everything working.
Yeah. Once he gets everything working, he'll start releasing his unadulterated, raw version of Gingerbread.
I thought everything was working?
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
Since nobody is under deadline, and the dev's are working in their spare time, there are 2 possibilities:
1. Whenever the Dev feels ready.
2. When YOU finish and release it. You impatient twit.
Sent from my HTC Hero CDMA using XDA App
I think cy7 gb is far better than aosp gb if I'm not confusing the two aosp too much fluff. There both a little sluggish when waking up the phone. Is anybody having the same problem?
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
tino0217 said:
I think cy7 gb is far better than aosp gb if I'm not confusing the two aosp too much fluff. There both a little sluggish when waking up the phone. Is anybody having the same problem?
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had lag until i changed the governor from interactive to on demand. It cured most of my lag issues.
-----
Sent from my CDMA Hero. I got some hot Gingerbread-on-Hero action here!
I'm currently running Darky's 10.1 final and it's great, but I've heard a lot of people rave about CM7. Is there something that CM7 offers that makes it better than what Darky offers? I'd try it myself, but I'm really happy where my phone is now so I'd prefer other people's opinions first before I invest time into switching over. Thanks!
If your most important feature is long battery life, or if you prefer to set your phone up once and then leave it as is....stick with darky's.
If you love tinkering and updating your phone regularly, want to be involved in a community effort, and prefer performance over battery life..come to cm7.
However, you never know till you try and it is very easy to flash back and forth now.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
rschenck said:
If your most important feature is long battery life, or if you prefer to set your phone up once and then leave it as is....stick with darky's.
If you love tinkering and updating your phone regularly, want to be involved in a community effort, and prefer performance over battery life..come to cm7.
However, you never know till you try and it is very easy to flash back and forth now.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! That was exactly what I was looking for.
I agree, also running darky's 10.1 and loving it... i tried cm7 but it had to many problems with MY phone.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
rschenck said:
If your most important feature is long battery life, or if you prefer to set your phone up once and then leave it as is....stick with darky's.
If you love tinkering and updating your phone regularly, want to be involved in a community effort, and prefer performance over battery life..come to cm7.
However, you never know till you try and it is very easy to flash back and forth now.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't say it better
Is it just me or somebody else there who preferes CM7 over ICS and feels CM7 is better, for the time being, than ICS, performancewise and customizationwise.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
CM7 is certainly more customizable for now, but if you're talking about performance and stability, both CM7 and CM9 are still not as good as some of the stock Froyo 2.2.1 roms, mainly due to free ram. With more free ram, the processor doesn't need to constantly close and reopen processes. Nonetheless, I prefer ICS over froyo and CM7 simply because of the many subtle yet important improvements, such as the keyboard and spellcheck, smoother game performance(eg: runs GTA3 with no lags), and the improved user interface.
ICS' only weakness in my point of view is the lousy multitasking, due to low ram on our galaxy s. I can't even open the browser and a simple game like angry birds at the same time without one of them being closed. Multitasking was slightly better on gingerbread and much better on Froyo.
CM7 in my opinion, is not faster than CM9, though it is currently more stable and has fewer bugs. But the huge community support that ICS has currently makes it better for me.
To check the multitasking I opened some apps and without killing them I checked the running processes. They are not shown there but in the cached running processes they are shown. Why?.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
mashray said:
To check the multitasking I opened some apps and without killing them I checked the running processes. They are not shown there but in the cached running processes they are shown. Why?.
Edit: cached backround processes
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Cm9 is still in development phase... Cm7 is stable and being developed since long time. Once cm9 is fully developed we can compare them...
Sent from my MB525
ManDOT said:
Cm9 is still in development phase... Cm7 is stable and being developed since long time. Once cm9 is fully developed we can compare them...
Sent from my MB525
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, thats why wrote "for the time being" and definitely I'm not comparing them. I'm just asking the users opinion to choose.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
CM7 was nice, but right now I'm just lovin ICS.It looks and feels way better.
CM9 all the way. I'm just surprised how good it is for alpha. Better than 2.3 roms, imo.
dheeraj11 said:
CM7 was nice, but right now I'm just lovin ICS.It looks and feels way better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep!!
yes
yes cm7 is much faster and stable than ics
Please remember that cm9 is still an ALPHA build.Sure it is not yet as custom able as cm7...but it will be. But back to the question tho , cm9 defo for me.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
And isn't the battery drain slower in CM7 than in ICS roms.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
mashray said:
And isn't the battery drain slower in CM7 than in ICS roms.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is... Battery backup of cm7 is better than cm9 that's why I'm back to cm7.
Sent from my MB525
I have never tested cm7. I think if you want to use a custom ROM, you should take ICS.
There isn't only cm9, you can also use something like AOKP (or BLUE LIGHTENING, a AOKP based ROM from BHuvan goyal), it is nearly bug free and very customizable!
If you like the stock ROMs, stay there!
I have asked this question before but since 2 months has passed, what is the fastest rom out right now?
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA
Would anyone care to answer my question?
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA
The one you dl and tweak out.
#Root-Hack_Mod*Always\
laie1472 said:
The one you dl and tweak out.
#Root-Hack_Mod*Always\
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant a rom by itself. But thanks
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Well from all the roms I've flashed the fastest ones I've dealt with is the DX OS and CM 7.2 release that just came out. I prefer DX OS but for me MMS was a big problem. I couldn't receive any through the DX messenger and had to use the default messenger to receive them. Besides that I loved it. CM 7.2 just seems a lot more stable and less of a headache if you want something simple and easy to use. Haven't had any problems so far with the OS. But at the same time I've tweaked it a lot more then any other ROM so far.
cm7.2 by far.
if your looking ics wise, i'm not trying to toot my own horn here but the aokp port i added is quite snappy, fun to mess around with. if you try it, see if youtube works! i havnt had anyone verify for me, i know it works for me though.
sense wise, definitely zero hero from matt and dastin
supercharger v6 script goes a long way with our old phones, use compcache and cut out bloat that you know you absolutely wont use
Developer community, hi, I had the S1 for about 2 years and still do, its very good phone yo know , however, what ever I do its too slow! I'm running Android 4.2.2 with over clocked CPU and 400+ of RAM, and sometimes when I leave a small app to main, it take sometime to load the launcher,so what's wrong? Was Google right when it stopped the Nexus S updates at 4.1.2 because it can take any farther? Does project better even exist? The fastest ROM I had ever install was ICS RC2 which worked perfectly (I could run MC3 at background then leave and do some thing else, then want back and its where I have lift it) but I had datadata problem and I had to try something els. Know a days ,some new flagships had less specification than S1 and work smother!, in short words: can I make my phone faster ?
All thanks and appreciates to whom worked to develop this great phone.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Flagship with less specification than s1?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
Yup, Some LG and Sami phones came with the same or less specifications
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Well, the more recent phones that come out right now for the low-end market are running alot newer chips than the S1 has. In my opinion, you shouldn't go to far with flashing newer versions of Android. But on the other hand, everyone wants to be on the most recent version of Android. Google had a reason for not pushing 4.2 to the Nexus S. Other manufacturers don't bring out updates for newer phones (for no reason), but Google had a good reason, because the Nexus S' hardware is outdated.
Unfortunately i doubt you can get your smoothest experience in 4.2.2.
If you want pure smoothness you should try a custom 2.3.7 as that would be ideal although i reckon 4.0.4(cm9 base) would do quite a decent job as well.
You have to try out different ROMs and see what best fits your needs.
Is a way that i use it and is good and smooth
But if expect like sg3 no it's not exactly like that but it's close. And don't disturb u
Cause our hardware's are a part of history
I installed 1.2gb apk and work smooth mostly software not game
First;
Buy a sd card high class 10
Format internal storage
Install cm latest version 4.2.2 with Odin
Install kernel like fishear
And set it up
Install cyanDelta
Install auto memory killer and set in optimum value
Install Roehsoft apk and make virtual memory on your external SD
Also never install any luncher cause it's own luncher is very light
and enjoy it
is good for daily works And smooth
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Of course 4.2.2 isn't going to be perfect. Pushing Project Butter onto our phone was a feat in itself. The smoothest 4.2.2 I've tried is Slim Bean, which really is pretty amazing. But don't be surprised about the fact that the phone can't handle Jelly Bean as well as it should. Its 3rd year anniversary is approaching fast.
Its still a wonder our single-core can handle it fine.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Hei man I dont know what roms are you using but try thinkingridge stable by aways and the c-rom mix 18...everything is stable at 55 frames per second in the ui...and ofcourse your phone will slowdown if you put a lot of stuff in it...its normal...you cannot pretend that is going to be fast as when you fresh install the rom..my girlfriend's iphone 4 is stock,no mods but still it lags a lot more than my VERY OLD I9000 ...
By the way anyone can give me some advices on a gingerbread rom?a kickass one? I saw a couple of releases in this days...they should be good considering that the developers had plenty of time to improve stability and performances...
Thanks
Speed depends on the kernel/rom your using and the way your using it. My suggestion is GamerzRom and use the greenify app. Try it and you ll see. Ive never had a faster rom!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
whatever you decide to do dont use task managers...they just mess with the android sistem and android knows better than you when and how to kill a process...
True i found out that task managers dont really work well
Greenify works the best and alot of people use it
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Sent from my GT-I9001 using Tapatalk 2
Hey there,
I HAD the same problem. The 2/3 changes I made was
1.UNDERClock to 800mhz (less stress on phone and less lag
2. Use Nova launcher as default
3. I am running slim bean latest and its fantasiltic
My phone has never run better
Stay away from themes though.
FYI I am a massive app hoarder so you may have a hundred apps on your phone and blame it on that but probability 9/10 isn't.
Hope I helped
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app