Database Develop

[REQUEST] Kernel

Hey all,
i am searching for something special, which none of the well known kernel designers could offer. I myself cant create kernels
Here is what i am looking for:
Device: Nexus FroYo with root
Kernel features:
OC: 1.13 GHZ
UV: 800mV
Audiohack
Ramboost
Is there anyone that could create a working Kernel with the given features?
Thx a lot
Tigger

The closest one you'll find with everything you need is: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=653598
It doesn't have OC but it's not necessary anyways. It has everything else you want.

mrandroid said:
The closest one you'll find with everything you need is: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=653598
It doesn't have OC but it's not necessary anyways. It has everything else you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know, but its exactly what i need. OC AND UV...thats why my request. but thanks for ur help,
im using intersectravens atm bfs .34 now...but it doesnt have OC

Froyo = pimpin'
With Froyo, you dont need OC... I thought I NEEDED it... but with SetCPU on active you'll see that the phone really only needs to run around the 245Mhz mark on the home screen and it'll rarely use all 998Mhz that it has...

RinTinTigger said:
i know, but its exactly what i need. OC AND UV...thats why my request. but thanks for ur help,
im using intersectravens atm bfs .34 now...but it doesnt have OC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd say it's a want, no so much a need, but I digress.
Wait for Ivan to update his kernel. He's been MIA though. Maybe he's dealing with real life. Look for his kernels a couple pages back and PM him. Or maybe send an email.

RinTinTigger said:
Hey all,
i am searching for something special, which none of the well known kernel designers could offer. I myself cant create kernels
Here is what i am looking for:
Device: Nexus FroYo with root
Kernel features:
OC: 1.13 GHZ
UV: 800mV
Audiohack
Ramboost
Is there anyone that could create a working Kernel with the given features?
Thx a lot
Tigger
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with not really needing OC on froyo but I guess its nice to have the option so here yah go
http://www.mediafire.com/?tzxwm0mjweo
Flash through the recovery menu or push to the phone just like you do with Raven's kernels but make sure you do a nandroid backup just in case something happens.
You didn't specify if you wanted BFS or CFS so I used CFS in this because personally I think CFS runs better overall on froyo.
(Although BFS really makes the launcher super silky smooth, it really chugs when I try to load Flash content in the browser but maybe this is happening to me only, I don't know )

wildmonks said:
I agree with not really needing OC on froyo but I guess its nice to have the option so here yah go
http://www.mediafire.com/?tzxwm0mjweo
Flash through the recovery menu or push to the phone just like you do with Raven's kernels but make sure you do a nandroid backup just in case something happens.
You didn't specify if you wanted BFS or CFS so I used CFS in this because personally I think CFS runs better overall on froyo.
(Although BFS really makes the launcher super silky smooth, it really chugs when I try to load Flash content in the browser but maybe this is happening to me only, I don't know )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But this oine is 950mV ...i wanted 800mV for better Battery!

RinTinTigger said:
But this oine is 950mV ...i wanted 800mV for better Battery!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
beggers cant be choosers

xXJay_RXx said:
beggers cant be choosers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But its why i opened the Thread. Im not to dumb to find the pershoot with 950mV...but i am requesting something different.
And it might be that requesters wont get what they ask for but for me, its totally worth a try!!!

RinTinTigger said:
But this oine is 950mV ...i wanted 800mV for better Battery!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oops.. sorry about that... I uploaded the wrong one... here yah go:
http://www.mediafire.com/?xni3mduojj3

wildmonks said:
Oops.. sorry about that... I uploaded the wrong one... here yah go:
http://www.mediafire.com/?xni3mduojj3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Testing it...who made it?
Does it have audi and ram boost?

RinTinTigger said:
Testing it...who made it?
Does it have audi and ram boost?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, BMW but they're both German so you're okay...

djmcnz said:
No, BMW but they're both German so you're okay...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the same thing too when I read "audi"
RinTinTigger said:
Testing it...who made it?
Does it have audi and ram boost?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I compiled it using the code that Raven publicly provides on his Github (latest as of 5/27/2010) and i added the overclocking code that you requested.
http://github.com/intersectRaven/ir-kernel-2.6.34/commits/master/
So it has everything that Raven's kernel has like the audio boost, 21MB ram, optimization flags, etc.

I decided to give this a try. Running great so far. Not sure if it's just a placebo effect, but it definitely feels snappier with that added .1 ghz.

halorin said:
I decided to give this a try. Running great so far. Not sure if it's just a placebo effect, but it definitely feels snappier with that added .1 ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, glad to hear it working out well so far for someone. Yah, after testing this out for a day I notice the same thing, a little more responsive, linpack has increased from 36ish to around 40 and flash heavy sites load quicker.
I'll probably use this kernel in my phone now for everyday use but use SetCPU to keep it at 998MHz until I need that little extra boost.
(Reason being because in order to run at 1113MHz the AVS has to boost the voltage up even higher then usual to keep it stable.)

Hm. Didn't know that, the voltage. Thanks.

RinTinTigger said:
But this oine is 950mV ...i wanted 800mV for better Battery!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm... didn't we test this out in some huge blind test of kernels and conclude that 950 gets better battery life than 800?

pjcforpres said:
Ummm... didn't we test this out in some huge blind test of kernels and conclude that 950 gets better battery life than 800?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess there are those few who see better battery life when using 800 .
Personally I use 950 because 800 makes my radio erratically switch between 2G and 3G in my workplace which in turn causes a big drain on my battery. This doesn't occur when I'm home though, probably because I'm so close to a cell tower.

wildmonks said:
I thought the same thing too when I read "audi"
I compiled it using the code that Raven publicly provides on his Github (latest as of 5/27/2010) and i added the overclocking code that you requested.
http://github.com/intersectRaven/ir-kernel-2.6.34/commits/master/
So it has everything that Raven's kernel has like the audio boost, 21MB ram, optimization flags, etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THANKS a LOT! Its working really good.
And to thos with the 950>800 opinion, i thought this at well, but, i testet so much kernels now, with my usage parameters and it worked better with an 800mV
Wildmonky, any chance you could also make an BFS Version?
I think you should give both kernels then to raven to add em to his repo! They are GREAT!
I was so much looking for this kernel!!!
THX a lot!
Tigger

RinTinTigger said:
THANKS a LOT! Its working really good.
And to thos with the 950>800 opinion, i thought this at well, but, i testet so much kernels now, with my usage parameters and it worked better with an 800mV
Wildmonky, any chance you could also make an BFS Version?
I think you should give both kernels then to raven to add em to his repo! They are GREAT!
I was so much looking for this kernel!!!
THX a lot!
Tigger
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem Tigger
Here yah go. Still no changes from Raven for kernel version 34 so its still dated 05/27/2010 to match.
2.6.34_AVS-800mV_BFS_1113Mhz_052710:
http://www.mediafire.com/?j2kmytmhqjm
Raven really hates overclocking so this will never be in his repo. But what I might end up doing is compile and upload to mediafire when a new update is out, if there is enough interest in this.

[Kernel]Alternative CM6/Ruby Kernel

Hey folks,
It was requested of me to make a thread regarding this. I have compiled an alternative kernel for aosp based roms. It should work with any of them.
1.0
All governors enabled, interactive patched in, conservative as default
Anticipatory scheduler vs. deadline ins stock cm6
Supports wired tethering
Latest source (may be newer than cm6?)
tun.ko support for vpn
More will be added later.
Thank you Koush, for providing me the fix for screen tearing and thanks sniffle, for helping me with making the kernel work with aosp
http://adrynalyne.us/files/kernels/cm6_ruby/
Source:
http://adrynalyne.us/files/kernels/cm6_ruby/source/

Nice job buddy! Thank you! I'll give it a shot tonight.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App

oh hell yea.
maybe this will help all us aosp guys get a stable phone to use...

Just loaded it up. Will be back. To report.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App

dnoyeb said:
oh hell yea.
maybe this will help all us aosp guys get a stable phone to use...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats the plan

Any plans to get undervolt and oc?

Trying now, thanks...
Is there a place I can find the Stock CM6 kernal, in case I don't like this one? Ill report back in a little bit

Its slower than the CM6 kernal. I ran a linpack of 27 and quadrant of 1277. This was both running "performance" mode, and turning set cpu to the max which was 1000. I Am going to give it a try, maybe the battery life will make up for the performance loss. If not, nandroid here I come.

bradm23 said:
Trying now, thanks...
Is there a place I can find the Stock CM6 kernal, in case I don't like this one? Ill report back in a little bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ditto request backup stock cm6 kernel

I just hope it fixes my WiFi shutting off constantly.

Seems to be really solid, a bit slower than cm-6 but also took care my screen flicker and haven't found any negatives yet (1.0+ hr up time) . Looking forward to some overclock variations. Thanks for the work adrynalyne.

bradm23 said:
Its slower than the CM6 kernal. I ran a linpack of 27 and quadrant of 1277. This was both running "performance" mode, and turning set cpu to the max which was 1000. I Am going to give it a try, maybe the battery life will make up for the performance loss. If not, nandroid here I come.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what to tell you. The Sense version of this kernel has considerably better than that.

adrynalyne said:
Not sure what to tell you. The Sense version of this kernel has considerably better than that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't complaining. I will take a slightly slower kernal thats rock solid and great battery, vs a quicker but less stable.. sorry I came off like i was complaining. I really appreciate all your hard work, thanks.

bradm23 said:
I wasn't complaining. I will take a slightly slower kernal thats rock solid and great battery, vs a quicker but less stable.. sorry I came off like i was complaining. I really appreciate all your hard work, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I didn't take it as such.
I just don't know why
Unless the scheduler differences are doing it. Its possible.
Did you say that the top speed showed 1000 in setcpu vs. 998400?

unstable for me on 9/10 nightly wifi on and no setcpu, 3 random lockups/reboots in past 2 hrs

32.61 linpack and 1341 quadrant. Its not much slower than cm-6. @adrynalyn, do you plan on bumping up the clock speeds? Mine is showing 1000 max btw. Thanks again

I wasn't complaining. I will take a slightly slower kernal thats rock solid and great battery, vs a quicker but less stable.. sorry I came off like i was complaining. I really appreciate all your hard work, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I didn't take it as such.
I just don't know why
Unless the scheduler differences are doing it. Its possible.
Did you say that the top speed showed 1000 in setcpu vs. 998400?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It shows 1k for me too

Yeah I plan on some future bumps.

THANK YOU ADRYNALYNE!!!!!!!!!! I was so pumped when you told me you did this .

adrynalyne said:
Oh I didn't take it as such.
I just don't know why
Unless the scheduler differences are doing it. Its possible.
Did you say that the top speed showed 1000 in setcpu vs. 998400?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1k max for me as well. 998 didn't seem to be an option.
I'm getting similar performance as I get with kernels i compiled from koush's source where i only changed cpu speeds for overclocking and udervolting. Not as fast as koush's even when i bumped it up to 1.19Ghz. Which i couldn't figure out why since i used exact same source

[APP] Andrev OC Adjuster.

EDIT: This has been suspended (by me), as it serves no purpose anymore.
Here's a little something I originally cooked up for the users of Topogigi ROMs, but works on any ROM which has the Andrev OC daemon installed.
It's an app with which you can adjust the OC-daemons settings, and apply them immediately.
Usage should be self-explanatory, ask in this thread if you have any questions.
WARNING: Remember that you may get an unstable phone if you overclock too high. Not all phones can handle high overclocks, especially not over time. I advise you to never go above 1216Mhz, even if it seems stable at higher frequencies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

No, question
Works fine here (v1.9 with HP Kernel 1.1)
THX

eagle1977 said:
No, question
Works fine here (v1.9 with HP Kernel 1.1)
THX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, good to know it's working on another kernel.

It reboots my phone when I use restart oc daemon button! Otherwise it works fine

wapz said:
It reboots my phone when I use restart oc daemon button! Otherwise it works fine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ooh, that's bad. Which Topogigi version, and which kernel? (And did you overclock too high?)

TrymHansen said:
Ooh, that's bad. Which Topogigi version, and which kernel? (And did you overclock too high?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, unfortunately. Topogigi 1.9 / HP 24BPP 1.1
OC 1216; undervolt =50

montresor60 said:
Same here, unfortunately. Topogigi 1.9 / HP 24BPP 1.1
OC 1216; undervolt =50
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here
But great app
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk

montresor60 said:
Same here, unfortunately. Topogigi 1.9 / HP 24BPP 1.1
OC 1216; undervolt =50
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok. My app does nothing more that kill the daemon and start it again, so that's probably what crashes the phone.
I really don't know the specifics of the HP kernel, but please, anyone who experiences this, please test under stable conditions, no undervolting, no overclocking, just try to save settings while already running at 800-1016 and restart the daemon then. If it still happens I'd appreciate if you can catch a logcat of what happens right before the reboot. (the OC daemon spits out some messages when it starts.)
Off to bed now, will attend to this tomorrow.

Add undervolt in your program!!!

wapz said:
It reboots my phone when I use restart oc daemon button! Otherwise it works fine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've to remove the battery when I change frecuencies :S
Topogigi 1.9+HP

yukkio said:
I've to remove the battery when I change frecuencies :S
Topogigi 1.9+HP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems to be a specific problem with the HP kernel. (It reportedly reboots using Terminal emulator and ADB as well).
I'm going to install it, see if I can reproduce it and find a work-around.

Well, that was fun.
The HP kernel reboots for me as soon as I put the phone in my dock, making it impossible (well, very impractical) to even install another version of the program. I knew it was sensitive, but not that much.
So that means I have no chance at all to find any workaround, and that noone using it will be able to logcat anything either.
That kernel is a WIP, and is simply not recommended at this time. If you use it, expect crashes. And don't look at your phone the wrong way.

Haha!
Nice utility, man. Very useful for adjusting clock on the go, particularly downwards. Gonna leave my 2X set at max=800 today and ramp it down to 389 when wi-fi tethering my tablet during travel to and from work.
OC is cool and it's sort of fun to watch those high numbers but the 2X runs fine at 800 for the way I use it.
edit: BTW, works great on TG 1.9, no fancy tricks.

montresor60 said:
Haha!
Nice utility, man. Very useful for adjusting clock on the go, particularly downwards. Gonna leave my 2X set at max=800 today and ramp it down to 389 when wi-fi tethering my tablet during travel to and from work.
OC is cool and it's sort of fun to watch those high numbers but the 2X runs fine at 800 for the way I use it.
edit: BTW, works great on TG 1.9, no fancy tricks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you.
In the name of full disclosure though, the ability to over/underclock is already there in the ROM (I see from your post you know this, this is just to address others reading this post), my app just makes it a little more accessible.
But I'll take all the praise I can get ;-)
Take care.

Want praise? I shall worship at your feet if you could add functionality to set profiles, a-la Pimp. Widget, when pressed, displays a menu of saved profiles. User selects one and the app does the rest, except for the screen-off /on thing, of course.
Doable?

montresor60 said:
Want praise? I shall worship at your feet if you could add functionality to set profiles, a-la Pimp. Widget, when pressed, displays a menu of saved profiles. User selects one and the app does the rest, except for the screen-off /on thing, of course.
Doable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doable? Absolutely.
Worth the effort? Mmm, not so sure. I'm working on another, much bigger project which is taking most of my time. I basically made the app cause I needed to get away from it a little bit. So if that ever happens again, who knows, it may happen. (But if I'm going to do that I guess I should go full hog with over/undervolting as well, in which case it'd probably be quicker to write my own daemon than to use the disjointed elements in place now.)
For now I'll put this in the pile of "Possible Projects." Thanks for the suggestion though.

More praise
Lovin' this app!
I had the 2X running at 800 for most of the day with around an hour at 389 while tethering, a total of 30 minutes browsing the web and replying to emails, another 30 minutes streaming video from BBC iPlayer through Cisco VPN at 1Ghz (the Rostropovich documentary is brilliant - only three more days before it's pulled), 30 minutes of listening to music through my fab new Sony MDR-7506 headphones while doing the laundry and dishes, 15 minutes testing some games at 1200 and a total of approximately 20 minutes of phone time (max=800 / gov=powersave). All day, wifi was set to never sleep and, 12 hours later, battery was at 28 %.
Fantastic.
This was under TG 1.9 with Topoblaze_06102011 kernel. Smooth as silk. For kicks, I re-flashed spica's HP kernel when the battery was at 19 % to see if I could squeeze another couple of hours out of this great phone - looks like it's easily going to make it to 14 hours.
Trym: if you add a little routine to display the label 'Reboot device!' in place of 'Restart OC Daemon' if spica's kernel is detected, all problems will simply vanish into thin air and you can put this baby to bed.
Pretty smart, huh?
Once again: thanks.

No its not needed. I will get it fixed at sunday. As sunday only i will get time for next version of hp krnl. I wish i could fix it faster but i only get PC access at sundays when I'm at home:/ At job days i work in other town far from my home:/
montresor60 said:
More praise
Lovin' this app!
I had the 2X running at 800 for most of the day with around an hour at 389 while tethering, a total of 30 minutes browsing the web and replying to emails, another 30 minutes streaming video from BBC iPlayer through Cisco VPN at 1Ghz (the Rostropovich documentary is brilliant - only three more days before it's pulled), 30 minutes of listening to music through my fab new Sony MDR-7506 headphones while doing the laundry and dishes, 15 minutes testing some games at 1200 and a total of approximately 20 minutes of phone time (max=800 / gov=powersave). All day, wifi was set to never sleep and, 12 hours later, battery was at 28 %.
Fantastic.
This was under TG 1.9 with Topoblaze_06102011 kernel. Smooth as silk. For kicks, I re-flashed spica's HP kernel when the battery was at 19 % to see if I could squeeze another couple of hours out of this great phone - looks like it's easily going to make it to 14 hours.
Trym: if you add a little routine to display the label 'Reboot device!' in place of 'Restart OC Daemon' if spica's kernel is detected, all problems will simply vanish into thin air and you can put this baby to bed.
Pretty smart, huh?
Once again: thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk

spica1234 said:
No its not needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good news (I was only joking - maybe badly). I understand your work / family situation (same here) and appreciate your time, experience and knowledge, spica.
FYI, I got around the VPN issue by using VPNC widget to connect to my service by Cisco IPSec , bypassing the native VPN module.
For now, I have to go back to Topoblaze_06102011 (I'm addicted to Trym's app) but after Sunday, LG O2X will be even better that IIGS, thanks to you and Topogigi.
Bravi ragazzi!

Welcome
montresor60 said:
That's good news (I was only joking - maybe badly). I understand your work / family situation (same here) and appreciate your time, experience and knowledge, spica.
FYI, I got around the VPN issue by using VPNC widget to connect to my service by Cisco IPSec , bypassing the native VPN module.
For now, I have to go back to Topoblaze_06102011 (I'm addicted to Trym's app) but after Sunday, LG O2X will be even better that IIGS, thanks to you and Topogigi.
Bravi ragazzi!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk

Clemsyn Cyanogen 7.2 ELITE Combo (gingerbread) 1.5 GHZ !! Updated 1/30/12

Big thanks to my friend who upgraded his phone and gave me his Atrix. BIG THANKS to my wife for giving me a quad-core CPU to upgrade our desktop (after I replaced the starter and alternator of her car) and also allowing me some time off from the kids to give me some time to build this combo. Big thanks to Blades, pershoot, koush, faux123, cyanogen, the whole Atrix-dev team and the Cyanomodgen Team, and other devs whom I might have missed , to all users of Gtabs, Transformer and Atrix for testing out my work and giving back their precious input.
WARNING: ONLY FOR ELITE TEGRAS!!!
To find out if you have an elite tegra, please flash my Elite kernel on this link
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1354502
and see if you can boot your atrix and it works. If my kernel don't boot, then this combo is not for you.
Updated: 1/30/2012
1. Added some OpenGL changes in the ROM
2. Added memory tweaks in the kernel
Here is the link
http://www.tunerspotter.com/clemsyn/ClemsynCyanogenEGLCombo1.5.zip
BTW, Please
here and help me buy some diapers
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
UPDATE: 1/28/2012
Changes:
1. Played with some voltages making changes within Nvidia requirements
2. Increased overclock to 1.5 ghz (YAY!!! It's going to be pretty hot in there)
3. Increased audio bitrate for HD 1080p (since the older one had a lower bitrate)
LINK
http://www.tunerspotter.com/clemsyn/Clemsyn1.5cyanoElite.zip
BTW, I would like your opinion in HD 1080p recording. Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
Changes:
1. ROM changes made to optimize overclock settings. This ROM will have a maximum speed of 1.4 ghz without the use of overclocking apps. If you wish to undervolt, then you can use PimpCPU, SetCPU, CPUMaster, System Tuner and etc....
2. Modifited bitrate and FPS for 1080p video recording for better result (IMHO but your input on this will be greatly appreciated)
3. The rest is regular Cyanogen gingerbread with fingerprint mods by the dev team
Your input will be appreciated
BTW, if you like my work, please click on the donations button under my signature or
and it will be appreciated. Thanks.
Here is the link
http://www.tunerspotter.com/clemsyn/ClemsynEliteCyanoCombo.zip
BTW, I would like input on HD 1080p video recording...Thanks.
Sources:
Atrix dev team github
faux kernel github
Cyanogenmod github
Now I have to try building Cyano for the Gtabs

Reserved....

Glad to see you here. I am one of the few who had boot problems with your other kernel.... but I'm still gonna try flashing this one.
I keep a backup of my current kernel on my ext-sdcard, so I'm not worried.
Do you know what what causing the issues with some phones not booting on your kernels? I can't remember what the problem was. Is it possible to fix?

Swiftks said:
Glad to see you here. I am one of the few who had boot problems with your other kernel.... but I'm still gonna try flashing this one.
I keep a backup of my current kernel on my ext-sdcard, so I'm not worried.
Do you know what what causing the issues with some phones not booting on your kernels? I can't remember what the problem was. Is it possible to fix?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same kernel so it will not boot Didn't have time to play with the kernel because I was excited in compiling cyanogen mod in my new quad core which compiled in 23 minutes (last time I tried it on my laptop which was a core duo, it took me 7 hours).
It could be a couple of reasons.
1. GPU, AVP etc where overclocked
2. Memory timings where pretty aggresive

Exact same kernel? No changes to it? (Like patching to .53 from .48)

Notorious544d said:
Exact same kernel? No changes to it? (Like patching to .53 from .48)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not yet but might soon, if time permits...building one for Gtab at the moment

clemsyn said:
Not yet but might soon, if time permits...building one for Gtab at the moment
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Out of curiosity... do you own the Atrix now?

Notorious544d said:
Out of curiosity... do you own the Atrix now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes (need to put more characters to post )

Any chance of getting voodoo to work on the atrix like with our transformers?
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk

That are some of the uv options in mv, on the faux kernel I can get the 216mhz down to 300MV so I was just wondering what I can expect from UV kernel with elite.
swyped from att gsii

Flashed this rom after using the CM9 port for a few days and missing my cam and LED flashlight. So far this is fast and no issues. I was a huge fan of the kernal and now I am a fan of the rom. Keep up the good work.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk

All good here also. I am anxious to how battery life is.

OMG OMG!!!! Huge fan of your work and glad you now have Atrix

Your att kernel works for me, but cm7 however, doesn't

What exactly is a "elite tegra" :X

Battery use update:
9% drain overnight (8 hours) using a SetCPU screen off profile set to 416 max.

justflorin said:
That are some of the uv options in mv, on the faux kernel I can get the 216mhz down to 300MV so I was just wondering what I can expect from UV kernel with elite.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obey the 100mv/step rule.

Feel like a NOOB
I was under the assumption that this was a combo and would work for either Cyanogen or a Gingerbread ROM but i can not get it to work with Wet Dream. However the ClemsynATT1.4elite works flawless.

rozzco said:
Battery use update:
9% drain overnight (8 hours) using a SetCPU screen off profile set to 416 max.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is your wifi setting or 3g setting at? on all the time or just completely off ?? sleep policy?

mapobean said:
I was under the assumption that this was a combo and would work for either Cyanogen or a Gingerbread ROM but i can not get it to work with Wet Dream. However the ClemsynATT1.4elite works flawless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a combo. Rom and Kernel. LOL.

Good workaround (Kernel/Firmware) against overheating?

Hello guys I got some huge problems here.
I recently switched from my Z2 to the Z3+ and actually like the phone but the overheating is insane and especially kills Pokemon Go through CPU throttling, which runs smoothly on my old Z2 .
So far I am on 253, cleaned it up and tried a self modified and the zach beta9 Kernel and and runs quite bad on both. Is heating a lesser issue of 224? I actually do not want to reflash the whole system to 224 just to find out it doesn't get better.
Also is there a way to undervolt/underclock? I can change settings in Kernel Aduitor but I have the feeling the phone doesn't really care.
Help much appreciated - thanks!

Try Zach beta 8 kernel. Limit max cpu frequency by kernel auditor.
Still it's only your Goodluck if your device cools down. It's a bitter truth about this model.

waseemakhtar said:
Try Zach beta 8 kernel. Limit max cpu frequency by kernel auditor.
Still it's only your Goodluck if your device cools down. It's a bitter truth about this model.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a clue whether 224 or 256 make a difference?
I will try beta8 and report back.

Delvius said:
Do you have a clue whether 224 or 256 make a difference?
I will try beta8 and report back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no there was no thermal improvements between these builds, dont flash your system back
but do underclock and tell us the results!
Im also affected by your exact problem

Try this kernel, seems promising. I haven't tried it since it doesnt have twrp.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xpe...m5z-kernel-t3421630/post67813517#post67813517
Edit: Today I have flashed 256, haven't found any improvement. As per my experience 256 haven't brought any noticable change.

**** posted twice and dont know how to delete

Thank you for the replies!
Tested zach beta8, didn't help. Now I am testing http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-z4/orig-development/kernel-om5z-kernel-t3421630/ as suggested and if that doesn't help much also with http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-z4/general/kill-overheating-flash-zip-t3421782.
And Stamina Mode helps at least a bit.

Statusreport: It always runs bad. But best at the moment with root patched Stock Kernel (253) and that underclocking zip. Although I think that underclocking doesn't really help at all.

Delvius said:
Statusreport: It always runs bad. But best at the moment with root patched Stock Kernel (253) and that underclocking zip. Although I think that underclocking doesn't really help at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are your temps? When does it start to throttle? Done any thermal-conf configuration to allow more heat?
---------- Post added at 21:03 ---------- Previous post was at 20:58 ----------
I know that @Trilliard has a very good and stable cpu governor where he has disabled two of the little and two of the big cores, this helps a lot if you underclock the remaining 4
Here are his files:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-z4/general/dont-custom-kernels-want-to-avoid-idle-t3409647
UPDATE: Added my edited files used to apply CPU tweaks (cores down clocked to 0.9 and 1.2ghz, two core disabled, tweaked cpu governor, power and others mods) and these files located in etc folder. Replace them and set correct permissions then reboot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

bjowol said:
What are your temps? When does it start to throttle? Done any thermal-conf configuration to allow more heat?
---------- Post added at 21:03 ---------- Previous post was at 20:58 ----------
I know that @Trilliard has a very good and stable cpu governor where he has disabled two of the little and two of the big cores, this helps a lot if you underclock the remaining 4
Here are his files:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-z4/general/dont-custom-kernels-want-to-avoid-idle-t3409647
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I didn't know about this combination - I will try it thanks!
Do you know about a thermal-conf? Actually never tried one. The phone gets hot indeed but I still think there might be some space before it actually melts.

Delvius said:
Actually I didn't know about this combination - I will try it thanks!
Do you know about a thermal-conf? Actually never tried one. The phone gets hot indeed but I still think there might be some space before it actually melts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what i thought as well i have my own here, its based on another persos post, but i dont remember where...
Anyways, his camera mod worked, but cpu throttle was not tampered with, and it caused a very unbalanced throttling... Ok yay i can use the camera linger and fluently, but when i exit the camera app, i cant use the phone couse its runnig at 348 mhz...
So i i did some modifications to it cpu never get under 840 for little cores, so your phones menues end web browsing are always safe from performance drops.
I made it to be able to play Pokemon go, and achieved a lot better resault than without any changes.. still prefer playing on my shield tablet, but if i dont have it around when theres a lot od pokestops nearby, then this will work for me.
While playing Pokemon go it does not go over 80 degrees, but using snapshat it can get to 85, so dont use snap for to long
Let me know if it worked for you!

bjowol said:
Thats what i thought as well i have my own here, its based on another persos post, but i dont remember where...
Anyways, his camera mod worked, but cpu throttle was not tampered with, and it caused a very unbalanced throttling... Ok yay i can use the camera linger and fluently, but when i exit the camera app, i cant use the phone couse its runnig at 348 mhz...
So i i did some modifications to it cpu never get under 840 for little cores, so your phones menues end web browsing are always safe from performance drops.
I made it to be able to play Pokemon go, and achieved a lot better resault than without any changes.. still prefer playing on my shield tablet, but if i dont have it around when theres a lot od pokestops nearby, then this will work for me.
While playing Pokemon go it does not go over 80 degrees, but using snapshat it can get to 85, so dont use snap for to long
Let me know if it worked for you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh nice! Thank you a lot! I will totally try it out directly when PTC comes back alive. X)
What kernel and governors do you use?

Delvius said:
Oh nice! Thank you a lot! I will totally try it out directly when PTC comes back alive. X)
What kernel and governors do you use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im using stock kernel, may switch to another soon. Im using stock bcause of batterylife and idle power consumption
Im using the governor and cpu modifications in this post ; http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-z4/general/dont-custom-kernels-want-to-avoid-idle-t3409647

Hmm. Still runs ****ty.
Can anyone give me a short guide how to edit thermal and governors?
According to my observations the phone gets hot and then cold. I think the throttle is more aggressive and needed and I want to make it less aggressive.

Update:
I made my own modifications to the thermal engine. It is pretty bad for battery I guess but I had a very good expierence playing Pokemon Go with it today. Yes the phone gets hot. Like it doesn't drop below 70°C while playing and regulary hits 80°C but it works good. No dark screen, no 0 CPUs downclocking. So far it's fine for me, maybe I get squeeze even more out of it.

Delvius said:
Update:
I made my own modifications to the thermal engine. It is pretty bad for battery I guess but I had a very good expierence playing Pokemon Go with it today. Yes the phone gets hot. Like it doesn't drop below 70°C while playing and regulary hits 80°C but it works good. No dark screen, no 0 CPUs downclocking. So far it's fine for me, maybe I get squeeze even more out of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done any other modifications to your file for a while? Or is it working good for you now? What's your SoT?

bjowol said:
Done any other modifications to your file for a while? Or is it working good for you now? What's your SoT?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still working good for me. Not sure if I can really squeeze out more and as long as it works at the moment I do not have a good motivation to try anything else.
No idea about SoT. Always running around with a powerbank. Probably bad, it is not designed for good battery life.

Delvius said:
Still working good for me. Not sure if I can really squeeze out more and as long as it works at the moment I do not have a good motivation to try anything else.
No idea about SoT. Always running around with a powerbank. Probably bad, it is not designed for good battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Allright thanks i might try your conf if i cant get mine to work like I want