Anyone who has tried OCLF in the tab with gingerbread rom onboard? does it even work in gingerbread?
You shouldn't really need oclf on gingerbread as the default filesystem is ext4 which is far better than Samsungs implementation of rfs on froyo.
The lag that's being fixed with oclf is due to rfs not responding quickly enough.
Hope this helps
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA Premium App
ck3ml said:
You shouldn't really need oclf on gingerbread as the default filesystem is ext4 which is far better than Samsungs implementation of rfs on froyo.
The lag that's being fixed with oclf is due to rfs not responding quickly enough.
Hope this helps
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The filesystem in gingerbread is already ext4? Is this confirmed?
Related
Hi, so I installed voodoo lagfix but its slower then the one I was previously using so I'd like to go back to that one.
The one thing is that to get rid of it you have to flash the stock kernel.
Could someone provide me with the kernel for I9000UGJH2?
Thanks alot.
get it here
http://samfirmware.webs.com/samsungandroid.htm
need Odin and 512 pit
Do I have to reparatition? Will my info be wiped or just reset to the other file system?
Sent from Samsung Galaxy S on Telus
Sent from my GT-I9000M using XDA App
it will be best to repartition as most of the lag fixes changes your partitions
Thanks for the help, I'm gonna wait out froyo, there isn't any notable difference in the two lag fixes just quadrant score.
Sent from my GT-I9000M using XDA App
Ok, Since CM7/MIUI are running on YAFFS2 on a MTD block, could we get stock ROMs to do that? Such as KI2?
Yes, but it would require a lot of work with almost no benefit.
Sent from a phone controlling a computer controlling a different phone
It would result in a benefit. YAFFS is a whole lot faster than RFS. Also smoother, compare MIUI/CM7 to stock Samsung ROMs... which one is better. MiUI and CM7!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
Hi All,
I looked all over for an answer to this. I'm running the stock leaked Verizon GB update and I was wondering if the ext3 format would apply or even be possible with the stock kernel. I'm extremely happy with the gb update and I'm completely dumbfounded as to why this isn't out yet? Skype works great and is the main reason I updated. Anyhow, thoughts about the ext3?
Cheers,
Rob
Sent from my SCH-I800 using Tapatalk
The stock kernels, unless it's a custom modded stock kernel, will not support the ext4 filesystem.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Cool, thanks for the answer!
I dont know if its me but I cant seem to get the quality search results on the app, that I can get online. I dont have a readily available computer, thats why I cant always search on one. Anyway......
I just flashed kk4. Am I overlooking an available kernel with voodoo sound/lagfix supported?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Samurai kernel will get you lagfix.
To get voodoo sound you'll have to buy the paid version.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Thank you very much. I was worried samuri was ext4, then I found an article saying GB is ext4, I was unaware. Also I couldn't remember if kernel version had to match build, but samuri is kk4 anyway.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Captivate Gingerbread runs on RFS. We convert to ext2 or ext4 with Voodoo/kernel.
Oh ok. Well maybe I missed something in the article then. It had said Gingerbread forward would be ext4. Either way, flashed samuri, things run great.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
SGS II run on ext4. Maybe the official release it will run ext4, but I doubt it all the leaks are on RFS
Hello I am running 2.3.6 stock FW with cf root kernal and a few mods (crt off, music/video player still works on low battery, cache scrolling off) so I need to install lagfix? Is wad my understanding that there was no need for it since 2.3 but I'm not sure any help would be appreciated
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
I dont think you will need it any more
If you want it speed up u can, but Lagfix (ext4) I heard it consume battery more than rfs.
Do you know how much by?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Ext4 is way better than RFS(FAT16 with some tweaks). I don't use gb anymore, but i suggest u to ask in the kernel's thread. Maybe the kernel already has enabled the ext4 partition by himself
Good luck