Database Develop

Tilt / Kaiser: what class Bluetooth?

What class Bluetooth device is the Tilt / Kaiser ? 1, 2, or 3?

It is class 2.

JwY said:
It is class 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is the source of this information?

awdbeast said:
What is the source of this information?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately it is Qualcomm which is not the most relible at the moment.
But, it is true, it is one of the best implimentations of BT v2 at the moment. The big problem is, not every device that quotes v2 is any form of a full version, just as versions of WiFi vN is not fully compatible as it has not been fully agreed on within the international market!
Not all BT audio devices that quote v2 are fully compatible and the worst at the moment seems to be early versions of Parrot equipment. It is one of those aspects that people have to experiment with and not initially blame the 'Kaiser' for without testing.

Class 1
Is there any way to convert to Bluetooth class 1 / increase the range / strength / amount of information being sent from the tilt?
http://www.daydeal.com/product.php?productid=13032
???

awdbeast said:
Is there any way to convert to Bluetooth class 1 / increase the range / strength / amount of information being sent from the tilt?
http://www.daydeal.com/product.php?productid=13032
???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that should say 'revert' and no, it is hardware specific.
BT power output is set by standard international agreement and changing data package would only compound the incompatibility with other devices.
BTW, why would you expect and earlier version to give you increased performance??

Qualcomm MSM7200A & MSM7600 Differences?

Hello,
what are the differences between the two Chipsets in the Rhodium and the Rhodium W?
Thanks!

chris.computerfreak said:
Hello,
what are the differences between the two Chipsets in the Rhodium and the Rhodium W?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess the MSM7600 is CDMA whilst the MSM7200 is GSM?
EDIT:
MSM7200 is GSM only
MSM7600 is GSM/CDMA dualmode, which would explain why the Sprint Rhodium FCC listing says it's got GSM disabled...
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=a7600&c=qualcomm_msm7600
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=a7200&c=qualcomm_msm7200

The AT&T GSM band version says: MSM7201a
http://www.engadgetmobile.com/photos/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/2032864/

I really fancy a TP2 and I may be reading this completely wrongly, but . . .
my Touch Diamond has a MSM7201A processor which is newer than the processor in the TP2 and is 65nm technology, whereas the MSM7200A is 90nm
Have HTC done some form of tweaking to give better performance from the TP2 because if not it doesn't sound like a considerable upgrade on what I have now

utvol06 said:
The AT&T GSM band version says: MSM7201a
http://www.engadgetmobile.com/photos/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/2032864/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at that link, the last sentence at the bottom in red...
"WM 7.x refresh awarded with Sept 09 launch date"
This is exciting me. Is this hinting for Windows Mobile 7 this year September?

stunno said:
I really fancy a TP2 and I may be reading this completely wrongly, but . . .
my Touch Diamond has a MSM7201A processor which is newer than the processor in the TP2 and is 65nm technology, whereas the MSM7200A is 90nm
Have HTC done some form of tweaking to give better performance from the TP2 because if not it doesn't sound like a considerable upgrade on what I have now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MSM7201A is not newer than MSM7200A. They are the same generation processor. non-A is 90nm, A is 65nm. 0 is original chip, 1 is with patent workaround. 0 outperforms 1, patent workaround introduced some performance issues.
Laymans term, 7200A is 65nm and faster than 7201A.
TP2 = much faster than TP (probably mostly related to tweaks we had in our custom ROMs anyways, and faster flash and ram chips).
Why do I need to keep telling people this....
LilGBlood said:
Look at that link, the last sentence at the bottom in red...
"WM 7.x refresh awarded with Sept 09 launch date"
This is exciting me. Is this hinting for Windows Mobile 7 this year September?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a typo, should be WM 6.x refresh, i.e. 6.5, which has been said to be released on actual phones in September for ages now.

By patent workarounds, may I hopefully assume it's concerning the hardware video acceleration part? If so, may I also hopefully assume the TP2 has some built in use of that part of the chipset??? Please.... My old HD is getting wore out and I need an excuse to upgrade
Thanks Chainfire... many respects...
Chainfire said:
...0 is original chip, 1 is with patent workaround. 0 outperforms 1, patent workaround introduced some performance issues.
Laymans term, 7200A is 65nm and faster than 7201A.
TP2 = much faster than TP ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

SomethingWicked said:
By patent workarounds, may I hopefully assume it's concerning the hardware video acceleration part? If so, may I also hopefully assume the TP2 has some built in use of that part of the chipset??? Please.... My old HD is getting wore out and I need an excuse to upgrade
Thanks Chainfire... many respects...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The patent issue AFAIK only has to do with some 3G stuff (I don't know how this relates to the performance issues of the 1 variant, though, I know there is something with that). Still TP2 does have HW 3D video - but so do the Diamond, TP, HD, and Diam2. The TP2 (and TD2) is noticably faster than the HD, though.

Chainfire said:
The patent issue AFAIK only has to do with some 3G stuff (I don't know how this relates to the performance issues of the 1 variant, though, I know there is something with that). Still TP2 does have HW 3D video - but so do the Diamond, TP, HD, and Diam2. The TP2 (and TD2) is noticably faster than the HD, though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, it would have been better if you could put some references about your comments. Especially this one: "Laymans term, 7200A is 65nm and faster than 7201A."
It seems you're right about patent issue (though it is hard to find anything about that), I found this site: http://www.scribd.com/doc/2140146/tag1202114pagenews1tQualcomm-Launches-UMTS-Chipsetsd578, which says:
" In December 2007, US federal judge issued an injunction against Qualcomm for infringement of three Broadcom patents and ordered it to stop selling 3G wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) cellular chips that breach Broadcom patents. The company has launched the mobile station modem (MSM) 6271, MSM6281, MSM7201 and MSM7201A chipsets in the US. According to the company, the new chipsets are pin- and software-compatible with the existing product versions for easy transition. "
So if the site i'm referecing is reliable, then you're right about this.
But where did you get the info about the 65nm? Could you give us some references? The only site I found (where the size is mentioned) is this: http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=a7200a&c=qualcomm_msm7200a and it says it is 90nm.
What's more interesting that on this site: http://www.qctconnect.com/products/msm_7201.html#Technical Features It says: "Qcamcorder™: Record up to 24 fps QVGA"
Meanwile here: http://pdfserv.datasheetpro.net/QUALCOMM/msm7200a_chipset.pdf
"Qcamcorder™ Encoder
• A real-time wireless video recording solution that captures movies at 30 fps WVGA"
(this datasheet - by the way - mentions lots of interesting infos)

mydexterid said:
Actually, it would have been better ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps if you asked nicely. And even then I'm inclined to tell you to UTFS (it's not like this is "new" information)
EDIT: BTW, seems I didn't mention it in this thread - I did in another - it does indeed seem that the US TP2 (non-Sprint, which will use MSM7600 series) is MSM7201A, while the EU (and possibly Asia) versions use MSM7200A.

Did you guys forget Xperia X1? It also uses the same processor like the Touch Pro2.
A thread like this has been discussed in X1 forum. Sadly, it seemed like X1 has the worse performance of them all...

netsurfz said:
Did you guys forget Xperia X1? It also uses the same processor like the Touch Pro2.
A thread like this has been discussed in X1 forum. Sadly, it seemed like X1 has the worse performance of them all...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the performance gains are due to faster RAM/Flash ICs, not the processor.

Chainfire said:
Perhaps if you asked nicely. And even then I'm inclined to tell you to UTFS (it's not like this is "new" information)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah.. what I expected.. Layman...

Chainfire said:
Perhaps if you asked nicely. And even then I'm inclined to tell you to UTFS (it's not like this is "new" information)
EDIT: BTW, seems I didn't mention it in this thread - I did in another - it does indeed seem that the US TP2 (non-Sprint, which will use MSM7600 series) is MSM7201A, while the EU (and possibly Asia) versions use MSM7200A.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And in just a few short hours i'll have mine in my grubby lil hands hehehe....
GOT TO GET ME DAT ANDROID NOW
[and its sprint - yey yey new cpu]
btw found some interesting things here:
http://www.datasheetpro.com/node/50272
gives some details on the 7600 chipset - very nice diagrams and whatnot

[Q] P1000 vs P1010 - any other differences than the missing 3G?

Hello.
I'm thinking about getting a Galaxy Tab wifi only, but are there any other spec differences between the P1000 and the P1010 other than the missing 3G?
Any known software issues with the P1010?
Thank you
/Henriette

HenrietteK said:
Hello.
I'm thinking about getting a Galaxy Tab wifi only, but are there any other spec differences between the P1000 and the P1010 other than the missing 3G?
Any known software issues with the P1010?
Thank you
/Henriette
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPU in P1010 is PowerVR SGX530!

IIs that better or worse than the 3G version?

Earthbrain said:
IIs that better or worse than the 3G version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PowerVR SGX540 in P1000 is much faster!

No GPS I think and BT 2.1 instead of 3.0

How much is much faster?
Sent from my E10i using XDA App

Don't care about the BT. I think the gps is actually there. Can anyone confirm that?
Sent from my E10i using XDA App

amujee said:
No GPS I think and BT 2.1 instead of 3.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does have GPS.
The CPU is also different.
In summary, there are 3 differences:
1. CPU (not much different, I think)
2. GPU (thus can't play 720p smoothly, forget 1080p)
3. Bluetooth (transfer speed is lower)
I own one, and I'm disappointed at the GPU.

So what one does att carry

Thanks. Not getting that one then. Want full power
Sent from my E10i using XDA App

HenrietteK said:
Hello.
I'm thinking about getting a Galaxy Tab wifi only, but are there any other spec differences between the P1000 and the P1010 other than the missing 3G?
Any known software issues with the P1010?
Thank you
/Henriette
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. The P1010 weighs maybe 1 - 5 grams less because you don't need to put a card in it.
2. The WiFi-only only has a 16GB internal memory model.
3. No EDGE, 3G, etc.
Where did you guys get the information regarding the weaker proc? The specs at pdadb.net and gsmarena are just the same? O_O
Unless, of course, they haven't modified it yet. O_O

Galaxy Tab WiFi is OMAP3
I just got a Galaxy Tab WiFi and will be returning it tomorrow.
The SoC is an OMAP3 of some kind. The GPU *is* an SGX530, which is significantly slower than the SGX540 on the Samsung C110 SoC. The OMAPs memory controller is also much slower than the C110s, various other OMAP bits are not up-to-spec compared to C110. The Galaxy Tab WiFi is a joke. Buy a nook color instead: save $100 and get a better LCD.
I'm sure that the product spec page for the Galaxy Tab WiFi said "C110 Applications Processor" a few days ago, now it reads "1GHz A8 Cortex Processor" (which isn't even written correctly, should be "Cortex-A8"...). I was suspicious when someone posted that they had inspected a P1010 ROM and it contained all of the TI OMX libraries, but I didn't believe that Samsung would redo the whole BSP for a product destined to sell zero million units.
I was wrong. Guess I'll wait for the Asus Transformer.

It seems that the firmware / Android version isn't upgradable by normal means.
There is no firmware or Android update selection like the Sprint version.
Kies indicates that the firmware is NOT upgradable.
Anyone know what's going on?

I brought mine yesterday
P1010 decode 720P video is fine (smooth) with stock video player
Screen is so great (actually better than my HD2 w/ Android) , just waiting for the great great xda developer work on the kernel so I can overclock mine...
Here is the list I really like
- ROOT access
- Overclocking , Memory Managerment
- UI Tweak (Using Go launcher at the moment)

pendevous said:
Where did you guys get the information regarding the weaker proc? The specs at pdadb.net and gsmarena are just the same? O_O
Unless, of course, they haven't modified it yet. O_O
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, I haven't seen anything definitive yet that shows it has the weaker CPU. Can any of you smart xda people who has either broken one open (not me, ...yet) or studied the code give a somewhat more definitive answer? I've had mine for 2 weeks now. I'm happy with its performance. But I know I'm going to want to play with the innards down the road. Is it really that much different from the tab phones?

Any update on this? I was going to get a WiFi tab but having second thoughts now...
@victor888 - what app did you use to play the 720p files, RockPlayer?

It is apparently different...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1054872

the P1010 is not Bluetooth keyboard Compatible (No HID inside). apparently does not support video output through HDMI cable, please advise if anyone is working.
_____________
Update... Solved Bluetooth compatibility.
Hi.
I could connect my bluetooth keyboard to my Galaxy Tab P1010 (only WIFI) by an application from the Android Market. This application is called "BlueKeyboard JP". I am using Stock GingerBread Rom.
greetings.

Tested it
Hey there,
I have read a lot about the differences of these Tabs, but I have not seen some real results.
So I just bought both of them... And I compared:
Fazit: the GT-P1000 is really faster then the GT-P1010!
I have made a screenshot of both Tabs. P1010 with Android 2.2.1 and P1000 with Android 2.2 with nothing running then Quadrant.
The results are:
P1000: 1090 Points
P1010: 691 Points
You can feel the differences by browsing, sliding the top bar down and using the back and home button.
I don't have pictures of the Hardwareinfos, but I lookes at them and there are a lot of differences. The CPU is the same. But the GPU is a [email protected] and a [email protected] All sensors are different and other things. [email protected] and [email protected]
I will make pictures and a list of all differences, if someone want's it.
Greetz,
Tillmet

I don't trust in Quadrant benchmark. If you use OCLF in the P1010 the result overpast the 1000 points.
In game I have good performace +-30fps in HD gameloft titles, like Eternal Legacy, Dungeon Hunter, etc. In video performace the P1010 play 720p h.263 very well (test it with the free Big Buck Bunny Movie 720p mp4, the picture quality is awesome) ;no so well with h.264 that need be 480p with a baseline level 3.0 profile.
Yes, is no so powerfull like the P1000 but with the price I am satisfied with it.
Ps. Android System Info show OpenGL 1.1 same that the P1000.

GPU for Samsun Galaxy Ace s5830i will not come out?

Yesterday I read an XDA archives that will not get full GPU for samsung Galaxy Ace s5830i .. But also Samsun Galaxy J has the same GPU so that you can use the same ROMs, but with bugs. WiFi does not work, gafika is terrible..
also says that the CPU 832 because the Galaxy Ace "and" using too much CPU for graphics....
WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THIS?

Can u share d source?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium

I believe this isn't supposed to be in Dev section
"Friends forever." - Ventus

CallMeVentus said:
I believe this isn't supposed to be in Dev section
"Friends forever." - Ventus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but you forgot a fact: s5830i aint got no section other then the dev section...

zeelie said:
True, but you forgot a fact: s5830i aint got no section other then the dev section...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have a title to state that it's for the S5830i .
And the Galaxy Ace sections refer to almost all variations , it's only the Dev threads that are different .
"Friends forever." - Ventus

acei consist bcm2763 GPU with 128MB memory.This is a videocore IV Gpu from broadcom,According to broadcom it is capable of decoding 1080p video playback
Check Below Link:
http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/12/...rocessor-for-mobiles-20mp-hd-video-recording/

akashshinde said:
acei consist bcm2763 GPU with 128MB memory.This is a videocore IV Gpu from broadcom,According to broadcom it is capable of decoding 1080p video playback
Check Below Link:
http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/12/...rocessor-for-mobiles-20mp-hd-video-recording/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think our hardware is bcm21553 not bcm2763...I saw our hardware info in setcpu app ..in info section..go to hardware

onedirection_1995 said:
I think our hardware is bcm21553 not bcm2763...I saw our hardware info in setcpu app ..in info section..go to hardware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have bcm21553 cpu and GPU is bcm2763 with 128 MB memory

Harley--TSI said:
Yesterday I read an XDA archives that will not get full GPU for samsung Galaxy Ace s5830i .. But also Samsun Galaxy J has the same GPU so that you can use the same ROMs, but with bugs. WiFi does not work, gafika is terrible..
also says that the CPU 832 because the Galaxy Ace "and" using too much CPU for graphics....
WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THIS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wtf is this samsung galaxy J...as far as i know there is no samsung galaxy J !!!!!!!

onedirection_1995 said:
wtf is this samsung galaxy J...as far as i know there is no samsung galaxy J !!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he meant Galaxy Y.
Yes, Galaxy Y has same hardware with S5830i
Damn, am I the only one who thinks S5830i sucks? I'm glad I bought a non i model lol
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

KcLKcL said:
I think he meant Galaxy Y.
Yes, Galaxy Y has same hardware with S5830i
Damn, am I the only one who thinks S5830i sucks? I'm glad I bought a non i model lol
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
me too agree with u!!..unfortunately brought an ace i...and btw we dont hav same hardware of galaxy Y...there r some similarities...our's is far more better than galaxy Y!!! didn't u see any galaxy Y..its cheap display i dont think we hav exact hardware of galaxy Y!!!!!!

onedirection_1995 said:
me too agree with u!!..unfortunately brought an ace i...and btw we dont hav same hardware of galaxy Y...there r some similarities...our's is far more better than galaxy Y!!! didn't u see any galaxy Y..its cheap display i dont think we hav exact hardware of galaxy Y!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well not hardware, I meant chipset lol
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

Broadcom® BCM2763 VideoCore® IV Processor Features 1080p Video, 20 Megapixel Photos and 1 Gigapixel Graphics in an Ultra-Low Power 40 Nanometer Design
IRVINE, Calif., Dec 15, 2009 -- Broadcom Corporation (Nasdaq: BRCM), a global leader in semiconductors for wired and wireless communications, today announced its next generation multimedia processor that delivers industry leading performance and lower power in the top multimedia categories for mobile devices. Using 40 nanometer (40nm) CMOS process technology, the new Broadcom® BCM2763 VideoCore® IV multimedia processor provides even higher integration, smaller footprint size and lower power consumption than 65nm designs.
With the higher integration and significant power savings from 40nm CMOS process technology, the BCM2763 multimedia processor features the most advanced mobile high definition (HD) camcorder and video playback, up to 20 megapixel digital camera and photo image processing, and 1 gigapixel 2D/3D graphics rendering for a world-class gaming experience. HD video, 3D games and high resolution 20 megapixel pictures can be displayed at top quality on full-sized HD televisions and monitors using an on-chip industry standard HDMI interface. Additionally, the BCM2763's highly integrated architecture reduces bill-of-materials (BOM) cost to help drive sophisticated multimedia features into more affordable handsets.
Highlights/Key Facts:
-- The breadth and quality of Internet multimedia content is rapidly
improving, with sites such as YouTube now supporting full HD 1080p video
sharing. Consumers are also increasingly using cell phones as their
primary digital camera and camcorder, which is driving demand for higher
resolution and more sophisticated image processing which is currently
only available on advanced standalone camcorders and cameras.
Additionally, newer graphics-oriented user interfaces and mobile games
now require enhanced graphics capabilities.
-- The new Broadcom BCM2763 VideoCore IV multimedia processor enables
best-in-class performance in the following areas:
-- Full HD 1080p camcorder capabilities in a cell phone with
significantly improved quality over current generation handsets
(which generally have VGA or lower resolution camcorders).
-- Up to 20 megapixel digital camera with advanced features such as
multiple shots per second, image stabilization, face and smile
detection and panorama mode.
-- The ability to render mobile games natively at up to 1080p
resolution, which in combination with an on-board HDMI output,
allows a console-quality gaming experience on large screen HDTVs.
-- In addition to providing these capabilities on new handsets, the BCM2763
has improved power savings using a 40nm process without draining the
battery or significantly reducing talk time. Additional ultra-low power
consumption features include:
-- 20% to 50% power reduction in comparison to the prior generation
Videocore III multimedia processor.
-- 4 to 6 hours of 1080p video recording and 8 to 10 hours of mobile
playback, with up to 16 hours of full HD playback over HDMI given
sufficient handset storage.
-- Only 490 mW of chip power is required for 1080p camcorder H.264 High
Profile encoding and only 160 mW for 1080p playback.
-- Only 160 mW of power is required for mobile game graphics
processing, supporting up to 1 gigapixel per second fill rates and
improves graphics performance by a factor of 4x to 6x in comparison
to the prior generation Videocore III multimedia processor.
-- The BCM2763 processor integrates the key functionality and components
needed to drive advanced multimedia capabilities in new handsets. As a
result of this high integration, the BCM2763 enables a lower overall BOM
cost, enabling manufacturers to pass these lower costs on and introduce
advanced features to lower tier phones than previously possible.
-- The BCM2763 integrates the functions of eight chips including GPU
and graphics memory, image signal processing (ISP) and ISP memory,
video processing and video memory, HDMI and USB 2.0. 128MB of LPDDR2
graphics memory is stacked in a single package.
-- The 40nm process enables reduced power, improved performance and
reduced handset board space.
-- Benefiting from an existing VideoCore software code base and legacy
architecture, manufacturers of phones and other consumer electronics
devices can easily add these new VideoCore IV multimedia features to
their products, allowing faster time-to-market.
-- The BCM2763 is currently sampling to early access customers (pricing
available upon request). Handsets utilizing this new 40nm VideoCore IV
multimedia processor technology are expected to reach the market in
2011.
Supporting Quotes:
Mark Casey, Vice President & General Manager, Broadcom's Mobile Multimedia line of business.
"VideoCore IV is setting new benchmarks for performance, power consumption and affordability and is poised to drive advanced multimedia capabilities into new tiers of handsets. Supported by our comprehensive line of complementary cellular and connectivity solutions, our multimedia processor technology is the right choice for next generation mobile designs."
Subscribe to RSS Feed: Broadcom Mobile Platforms Group
About Broadcom
Broadcom Corporation is a major technology innovator and global leader in semiconductors for wired and wireless communications. Broadcom products enable the delivery of voice, video, data and multimedia to and throughout the home, the office and the mobile environment. We provide the industry's broadest portfolio of state-of-the-art system-on-a-chip and software solutions to manufacturers of computing and networking equipment, digital entertainment and broadband access products, and mobile devices. These solutions support our core mission: Connecting everything®.
Broadcom is one of the world's largest fabless semiconductor companies, with 2008 revenue of $4.66 billion, and holds over 3,650 U.S. and over 1,450 foreign patents, more than 7,750 additional pending patent applications, and one of the broadest intellectual property portfolios addressing both wired and wireless transmission of voice, video, data and multimedia.
A FORTUNE 500® company, Broadcom is headquartered in Irvine, Calif., and has offices and research facilities in North America, Asia and Europe. Broadcom may be contacted at +1.949.926.5000 or at www.broadcom.com.
Cautions regarding Forward Looking Statements:
All statements included or incorporated by reference in this release, other than statements or characterizations of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry and business, management's beliefs, and certain assumptions made by us, all of which are subject to change. Forward-looking statements can often be identified by words such as "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "predicts," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "may," "will," "should," "would," "could," "potential," "continue," "ongoing," similar expressions, and variations or negatives of these words. Examples of such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the timing that handsets utilizing the Broadcom BCM2763 VideoCore IV multimedia processor are expected to reach the market, and the effect of the VideoCore IV on advanced multimedia capabilities in new handset devices.. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statement.
Important factors that may cause such a difference for Broadcom in connection with the BCM2763 VideoCore IV multimedia processor, but are not limited to:
-- the rate at which our present and future customers and end-users adopt
Broadcom's mobile multimedia technologies for mobile applications;
-- trends in the multimedia processor markets in various geographic
regions, including seasonality in sales of consumer products into which
our products are incorporated;
-- the gain or loss of a key customer, design win or order;
-- the volume of our product sales and pricing concessions on volume sales;
-- our ability to timely and accurately predict market requirements and
evolving industry standards and to identify opportunities in new
markets; and
-- competitive pressures and other factors such as the qualification,
availability and pricing of competing products and technologies and the
resulting effects on sales and pricing of our products.
Additional factors that may cause Broadcom's actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to the list that can be found at http://www.broadcom.com/press/additional_risk_factors/Q42009.php.
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, recent Current Reports on Form 8-K, and other Securities and Exchange Commission filings discuss the foregoing risks as well as other important risk factors that could contribute to such differences or otherwise affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The forward-looking statements in this release speak only as of this date. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statement, except as required by law.
Broadcom, the pulse logo, Connecting everything, the Connecting everything logo and VideoCore® are among the trademarks of Broadcom Corporation and/or its affiliates in the United States, certain other countries and/or the EU. Any other trademarks or trade names mentioned are the property of their respective owners.
Contacts
Trade Press Investor Relations
Henry Rael T. Peter Andrew
Public Relations Manager Vice President, Corporate Communications
949-926-5734 949-926-5663
[email protected] [email protected]
SOURCE Broadcom Corporation; BRCM Mobile & Wireless; Broadcom Mobile Platforms Group
http://www.broadcom.com
Copyright (C) 2009 PR Newswire. All rights reserved
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.broadcom.com/press/release.php?id=s430181

Mi 8 GPS inaccuracy

I just buy xiaomi mi 8 a week ago only for dual GPS signals. But it's accuracy stuck at 16. Even update to miui 10. Any one have better accuracy for mi 8?

i got it below 8 but it didnt last long. its normally at 16. My oneplus 3 was next to it with a 4m while the mi 8 had 16m accuracy. Hopefully its just a bug and will get fixed

Seeing the same thing here. Hoping a future firmware update improves things.

Broadcom always sucks,their GNSS solution from the Global Locate is far from accurary compared to the Qualcomm Atheros solution,even on some older widely used and more stable BCM47531 chips,i can always get just 5-6m accruracy

Try xiaomi.eu miui

Which app are you using?

ermacwins said:
Which app are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gpstest
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.android.gpstest

on MIUI 10.8.26 Beta In Germany.
After Screenshot it went down to 4m Accuracy.

Got an update the other day to MIUI 9.5.11.0 and since then, i get 4m accuracy according to "GPS Status" & "GPSTest" indoors.

Guys, I am running the EU ROM (MIUI 10)and my accuracy is 2m during driving, average 28 satelites. On chinish ROM I had only 16m accurcy.

I get the lowest is 1.3~2, but average is 4.

Try switch to GPS only, I.e. without WLAN and Bluetooth assist. I generally get consistent 4m accuracy and sometimes down to 2m.

Just arrive my brand new phone and in spain with the global rom inside a building near a window it has 16 m accuracy and a SNR of 21 aprox.
With and without wifi or bluetooth or anything. Lets hope it gets fixed. : _ (

I bought this phone because of it's theoretical good dual GPS but I'm really disappointed.

skanskan said:
I bought this phone because of it's theoretical good dual GPS but I'm really disappointed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some quick tests with raw measurements data with Global Beta 8.8.21 give me some hope. BTW: Don't believe the accuracy display! What counts only is multiple testing against known points.

JoB46 said:
Some quick tests with raw measurements data with Global Beta 8.8.21 give me some hope. BTW: Don't believe the accuracy display! What counts only is multiple testing against known points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what hope it gives?

Try this: https://forum.miuiturkiye.net/konu/gps-sorunu-ve-coezuemue.26577/
Just translate to english. Work for my Mi 8 MIUI 9 CN version

Vihru said:
what hope it gives?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That real GPS (not estimated) accuracy and reliability becomes better. Why? Because raw measurement testing with 8.8.21 gives far better results than 8.8.7 especially with pseudorange errors.
if you are interested in GNSS & Android topics:
https://medium.com/@sjbarbeau/dual-frequency-gnss-on-android-devices-152b8826e1c
https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/sensors/gnss
https://insidegnss.epubxp.com/i/960969-mar-apr-2018 (page 48)
Please do not trust in accuracy (estimates) which is displayed in any kind of software, just measure it against public well known points.
just my 5 cents: Mi8 is the first Smartphone with L1/L5 capability so developers have lot of work to bring the 30 cm marketing story to real life and software releases may be delayed because of this complex task.

With the latest MIUI update, the "16 meters" accuracy bug has been fixed.

Has anybody tried the "Global optimized GPS File Replacer" Magisk's module?
Would it make any improvement or is that setting already included on MIUI10 or Xiaomi.eu?