{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Stable at 1.8g with over 3k quadrant score
Sent from my HTC-X710a using XDA App
Wow..if quadrant meant anything....this would almost be as fast as a SGS2.
This is done with the stock Rom, I guess scense UI is dragging the score down
Sent from my HTC-X710a using XDA App
yeah....sense is a pig...here's my SGS2 ....just ran it, completely stock...only root
..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
93795311 said:
Stable at 1.8g with over 3k quadrant score
Sent from my HTC-X710a using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you using the Holicakes kernel?
vhjc said:
Are you using the Holicakes kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, the 1202 version
93795311 said:
yes, the 1202 version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just flashed and here are my results:
OC 1.5Ghz
OC 1.8Ghz
Simply AMAZING!!!!
damnit, we need the bootloader unlocked SO BAD!!!!
though how's battery life? LOL bet it takes a monster hit.
im sure Sense brings it down alot...I was able to get ~3200 on the stock skyrocket.
Now don't take this the wrong way, I love my htc phones. But if you really want to see some blazing quadrant scores pick up an atrix, put cm7 on it with faux kernel and o/c it and you will be pushing close to 5000 if not over. I wish I had some pics of the one I had, the thing was crazy fast. I have up an international sgs2 and kept the atrix because it was so much faster.
I am stunned that the vivid score is so low being o/c so high, mine is the att version so I can't really enjoy playing with it like others can but my amaze running the stock kernel at 1.5GHz only gets to around 2770 at its highest. If I didn't love sense so much I'd flash a rom that doesn't have it just to see how much faster it is.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
donharden2002 said:
Now don't take this the wrong way, I love my htc phones. But if you really want to see some blazing quadrant scores pick up an atrix, put cm7 on it with faux kernel and o/c it and you will be pushing close to 5000 if not over. I wish I had some pics of the one I had, the thing was crazy fast. I have up an international sgs2 and kept the atrix because it was so much faster.
I am stunned that the vivid score is so low being o/c so high, mine is the att version so I can't really enjoy playing with it like others can but my amaze running the stock kernel at 1.5GHz only gets to around 2770 at its highest. If I didn't love sense so much I'd flash a rom that doesn't have it just to see how much faster it is.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The sgs2 hits about 6k with cm7 and Overclocked to 1.6ghz. The atrix ain't got nothin!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
this is crap, on my HTC EVO 3D with Ziggys kernel at 1.7GHz ive gotten quadrant scores of 4500, and on Anthrax kernel at 1.67 GHz ive gotten antutu scores of 6500 and the kernel is just in beta stages
Related
Sorry if this had been discussed somewhere else but what kernels, roms, or settings using set cpu or voltage control or whatever should i use to get the 2000+ quadrant score ive been dreaming of... The best i got was 1895.. Im on RYAN OCLF and i overlocked it to 1.2 ghz... Im on stock 2.2 and on the voodoo kernel.. Please post your scores and combinations so i can try them all :-D
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
My best: 2520
Deodexed JVK 2.3.3, CF-Root-XX_OXA_JVK-v3.1-CWM3RFS
Tweaks: RAM,SD,I/O,Kernel,VM,Media,Touchscreen
/system ext4/dbdata ext4/data ext4/cache ext4
no OC/UV
And if you are dreaming of quadrant score, then you are in trouble
Dont want to sound like a noob but i really dont get what u wrote here can u bare with me and explain?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Basically to get a better score as you have now is to install gingerbread(stock is fine, doesnt have to be deodexed) rom + CF root kernel. Enable its tweaks in the Tweak app. Convert to ext4. Thats it. Before you do , you know the drill. Backup, unlagfix, and you have been warned, when you mess up its on you
The corresponding links to these parts are in my signature first row I think
Please. Quad scores are pointless.
For example : a drag car can hit 250 MPH in 6 seconds, but its not very useful for taking the kids to school.
The only value of quad etc scores is to measure the effect of changes/ mods to your own device. If quad scores were important we would all own LG optimus 2s, wouldn't we?
The real test is how long you can run dungeon defenders before your phone melts!
Oh btw my best quad score was 2300 ish running MIUI RC4 overclocked and undervolted. I could have increased the score by forcing the CPU to run at 1.3 ghz all the time, changing the governor settings, closing all apps and services and blasting nitrous oxide through the air intake but I didn't bother.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Overlocked and undervolted to how much ?
I got the idea but it's nice to have the highest score among my friends
You can easily get over 3000 with an ext2 loopback ontop of ext4 plus an overclock. But that's beside the point.
What matters is how it feels and performs day to day, that's more personal opinion. Quadrant is virtually useless IMO.
If you want a "true" quadrant score for what the Galaxy S is capable of without cheating/overclocking, you're probably looking at between 1600-1800 depending on ROM and filesystem.
If you are doing this just to impress your friends...well I don't know who that reflects badly upon, you, your friends, or both. Seriously, give it up, or just resort to comparing d!ck size.
These 2000+ quadrant scores are obtained by abusing the way the thing is tested; changing the file system and setting a loop fools the program into thinking the phone is faster than it is. There are people who've hit quadrant scores of 5000+ just by messing with this filesystem thing, with no real performance difference.
In short: Don't bother with it.
Quadrant Score isnt representatove point performance
This My HTC HD2 with my build adreno2D3D driver project but its just little boost on real graphic performance and with quadrant it will show this so not only I/O partically error benchmark
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
How many examples do we need that Quadrant is not very accurate/useful
What clock frequencies are you guys using. I am running at 1ghz 59vsel and the battery life isn't as good as 550 mhz (I know it shouldn't be). What frequencies and vsels are you guys using and what's the battery life like.
Also what roms are you guys using. I'm on cyanogenmod7. I was on cronos gingerbread for a while but it doesmt seem to go on standby. Anyone help?
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
I'm running Bugless Beast (GPA 15 Beta) with a 1.25 ghz low voltage kernel + comp cache enabled. It's rare for me to need to plug in the phone more than once a day to charge. Just google Peter Alfonso. He not only develops the ROMs but the kernels as well. He's doing AOSP Gingerbread builds that I find to be superior to CM7.
Isn't Bugless Beast only for Droid? Because I think he might be asking about Milestone.
skadude66 said:
Isn't Bugless Beast only for Droid? Because I think he might be asking about Milestone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might be right.
Derp. Disregard my lack of reading comprehension skills.
M1d said:
You might be right.
Derp. Disregard my lack of reading comprehension skills.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sucks, I heard that Peter Alfonso's kernels are pretty beast at battery life.
chevyNo1 5.2, gb, best rom I have used, had bb for a while, cm6.2, droid mod. run at 900mhz, battery is good
Latest build of miui rom is very good. Good battery life. 1000 MHz with smartass governer.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Milestone using Tapatalk
Thanks for the help so far guys. I've found gingerbread roms rtather slow when it comes to gaming (probably because gingerbread has not been released officially to any sgx530 phones). The new froyo uk update is so damn fast. Its ultra smooth at 550mhz. Has anyone made a custom rom based on the new official 2.2 milestone update?
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
And where can I find the latest version of miui. The one I can see on google has that can't use wifi and mobile data at the same time
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
choudu1 said:
And where can I find the latest version of miui. The one I can see on google has that can't use wifi and mobile data at the same time
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forums.miuiandroid.com/showthread.php?6030-MIUI-1.5.6-Milestone-Deodexed-(Chinese)
http://forums.miuiandroid.com/showthread.php?6048-MIUI-1.5.6-Milestone-English-Pack-1b
Thanks
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
Whats the gaming and 3d performance like on miui? I want to play dungeon hunter and modern combat 2 on my milestone
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
Right now I'm running on 1GHz with 66vsel, but still battery life isn't good enough. I tried 59vsel like @choudu1, but phone is unstable and restarts every now and then.
I'm not sure if I need any more power since almost every game I've played runs smoothly and the phone is quite stable. The only games I can't run on decent framerate are Soul Reaver and Tekken 3 via PSX emulator psx4droid.
Running CM7 from 14.06 without problems.
Clocks:
800Mhz vsel 52
700Mhz vsel 44
600Mhz vsel 42
400Mhz vsel 35
250Mhz vsel 25
interactive governor
My battery can stand for two days with (my) normal use(few calls, few sms, some games, some internet using wi-fi, but not often). With heavy use it can stand for (almost) one day.
A new benchmark app was released and I was wondering what scores everyone else was getting. I got 612.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.quicinc.vellamo&feature=search_result is the link to make it easier for people to find the app.
Edit: running it now, will report back.
Nexus S (smartass; 1.0GHz)...: 717
Nexus S (ondemand; 1.0GHz): 784
Nexus S (ondemand; 1.3 GHz): 984
TF101 (interactive; 1.0GHz)..: 1136
TF101 (interactive; 1.6GHz)..: 1240
TF101 (interactive; 1.6GHz)...: 1248
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
my Nexus S ranked 3rd tied with EVO 3D (dual core). lol
Edit: Nexus S ondemand 1.3 GHz 984
TF101 1.6 GHz interactive
hmmm? either somethings weird with this benchmark orrrrr the nexus s is amazing? all phone/tablet specs below.
1.2Ghz Ondemand
got a 1023 the second time. lol
723 my second time with a 1.3Ghz overclock. I think I need a new rom.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
tominater12 said:
723 my second time with a 1.3Ghz overclock. I think I need a new rom.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM + kernel are you using?
tominater12 said:
723 my second time with a 1.3Ghz overclock. I think I need a new rom.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock? The CM7 nightlies have been very stable for me.
zephiK said:
What ROM + kernel are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Infin1ty 1.3 and the latest netarchy kernel. Just been waiting on cm 7.1 final.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
tominater12 said:
Infin1ty 1.3 and the latest netarchy kernel. Just been waiting on cm 7.1 final.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download CM7 RC1. It's pretty stable. Nightlies are usually stable too, but if you need it 100% purely stable. CM7 RC1 is the way to go. I'd use CM7 nightly again but ehhh. i don't see anything worthy of updating to the latest with the exception of Screenshot.
And heres the Engadget article of Vellamo http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/14/qualcomm-launches-vellamo-browser-benchmark-for-android-devices/
I scored 924 on my NS... its close to the Galaxy tab 10.1 (3.1)
890 at second attempt!
840 at my first attempt
I'm under SuperAOSP 8.6 with Netarchy 1.3.7 CFS O/C at 1300MHz Smartass.
EDIT : 946 at my second attempt always at 1300MHz but with Ondemand gouvernor
what exactly does these numbers mean???
jlopez1286 said:
what exactly does these numbers mean???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its benchmarks.. higher they are the better they are.
but in theory, benchmarking doesn't really mean much. just for fun, i guess
zephiK said:
its benchmarks.. higher they are the better they are.
but in theory, benchmarking doesn't really mean much. just for fun, i guess
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, thanks, i guess i have a good score...
All day...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Suck it stock IncS.
3651 at that same frequency.
my loss of points was SD card because I'm using a class 2 16gb card, not the 8gb class 4 that came with it.
Different benchmarks as I took them a few weeks ago, but could be interesting for the sake of comparison anyways. The first picture was taken at stock clock speed using the Quadrant benchmark. The second was taken @ 1209MHz and the third @ 1401MHz I believe (I didn't take note so it may vary +- 100MHz). I wasn't brave enough to go any higher Although I know that the Tiamat kernel could allow you to go up to 2.0GHz which is just ridiculous. Setup shown in my signature.
ARHD 1.1.7 and Quadrant Advanced.
itsbeertimenow said:
All day...
Suck it stock IncS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering what ROM you were using on that test?
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
AnTuTu
Quadrant
More recent
this competition may lead to some bricked devices..anyways will make a good paper weight...
Sent from my inspire 4g using cm7 n259
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
itsbeertimenow said:
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I know is that guy has an Incredible S phone and today isn't national trolling day, right? So this even is actually possible, but still very hard to believe. Even though he managed to overclock it's GPU then it's more reasonable...
So here's my benchmark http://www.upload.ee/image/1850697/2011-11-29_22-45-30.png -.-
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
specifications please. thats really amazing bechmark !
highKo said:
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
highKo said:
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The uv/oc setting s are always restored to the kernel default once your phone is restarted unless you have your app set to "set on boot" which is never a good idea as bricks are made this way. And yes when you flash a new Rom it installs a new kernel and your setting s are set to the kernels default until you set up your oc app from wihtin your Rom.
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
keroro430 said:
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That bench was clocked at 1804 it tottally depends on which Rom your using and which kernel. That was cm nihtlies and I can't remember the kernel, all I remember was the title contained the words "lightning fast". I've used roms with kernels that won't let you surpass 1.1 ghz and I've used ones that let you o.c. to 2.1. Weather or not your phone locks up is a different story. It doesn't seem to matter if its sense or aosp as I've had both clocked over 1.8. Generally the phone will freeze if you have uncompatible settings and it tries to run more than 4 processes at once.
here's mine.
Cyanogenmod 7 Nightly + Lord Clockan's kernel also ICS theme really looks great.
This bench is at 1.6Ghz but normally it's set to ~1.2Ghz and get almost 3 days battery life.
Incredible S is an incredible phone!
Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz
Equinox_br said:
Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before something changed I was able to get 3400 with 1Ghz and vorkkernel
So, this means that my score is bad?
What can I do to make it better?
Stock phone I was scoring like 2700, Volkernel 1Ghz like 2900 and now at 1.4Ghz with 3900.
Stock Galaxy S II scores something like 3200 if I remember.
Maybe you were running 1.1.6 version of Quadrant no?
that just score, and in benchmark, you will not see difference between 3000 and 3400 when you use it. the best combination is, when you feel a very big woow.
i got that feel with latest GO Launcher EX, and stock v10D with latest neoblaze [email protected] ext4, i removed cardock or what, and now i see a very very big difference with a very good standby time.
very fast scrolls in browser, gallery, and settings and launcher, install apps 5x faster, take shot 2x faster with camera, and the speed in browser is extremly fast. it boots much faster, you can try init.d tweaks for memory management.
and now... you can spend your time with make your homescreen, or skin nicer and nicer, and then share with us
With topogigi v1.7, OC at 1,4GHz got 4110 in quadrant!
At 1GHz was 3231
Edit with v1.9 +SP1 & HP kernel RC1 @1,4GHz "4416"
Custom kernels support "epeen enlargment".
Thats a different aproach to how sql database writes which doesnt make difference in speed in real use but makes a huge diference in benchmarks.
Where you see "sql hack" avoid it. No real advantage and it could be a potentcial data loss.
So there is a big part of the change
Wow...Reading this I feel like I still have to learn a lot about Android developments! hehe
In general I'm very satisfied with my phone, its fast, stable, never had an error.
I'll see if I can touch the 4000 score without increase processor speed, any tip?
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
Edit:
Guys, my 3g network was bad and I tried to restart my phone, when initializing he froze on LG logo (second one). I tried to replace the Kernel and had no success, so I had to reinstall CM7!! And the phone worked....I think that the problem was a Vorkernel update that I made by a program called Vorkernel update inside the OS!
Now I'm using the stock kernel from CM7 till get home at least. I ran Quadrant again and got 3143 point @1.0Ghz! That is a lot! hehe
Leaked GB 2.3.4
1.4ghz NeoBlaze ROM
Quadrant 1.1.7
2760 score. My phone is broken
Ah.. 3182 now, overclocking program wasn't working!
3658 run two...
3710 run 3.. nice.
Restored phone, went to Topogigi 1.9, 1.4ghz still, now getting around 4600... much better.
Topogigi 1.8 sp1
1,4Ghz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Topogigi's 1.9...
justclimb said:
Topogigi's 1.9...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unable to download..:-( :-(
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!
indyjones83 said:
4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4586 for me ;-)
2541 At stock looks like a bad score to me :/
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
Striatum_bdr said:
4586 for me ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While we're having a pissing contest...
Mungulz said:
While we're having a pissing contest...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap, in Topogigi's thread a guy showed a nearly 5000 screenshot with some tweaks of his own..
It's probably good to remind that tweaking a ROM to have better scores in benchmarks doesn't mean a better user experience in practical use.
When you know which tests are made by the benchmark app, you can optimize the dedicated part of code in ROM to have better results, it dosn't mean the entire ROM will be snappier. The most famous is sqlite optimizations as all benchmarks use sqlite tests...
So it can give a good idea but it's not the Holy Bible...
2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.
Soulj4h said:
2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine on stock 2350-2600
So dont worry
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
I'm thinking if I should install the neoblaze kernel on stock
You should, if you have spare batteries
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk