Is cm7 safe for daily use? the one made by sir Squadzone .. "especially for games" cause i really9x like his works..
Do you mind posting your opinions and experiences..
I really would love to hear from you guys.
yes it safe....
but the battery drains faster
chepoz said:
yes it safe....
but the battery drains faster
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For how long have you been using cm7 sir chepoz..
since i join this forum.
sent from Nokia 3310
chepoz said:
since i join this forum.
sent from Nokia 3310
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you encountered any problem sir on your phone using cm7?
I presume your using overclock kernel by Mr Squadzone ..
Did it fry your processor sire?
Btw thanks very much for your replies .. i really appreciate it...
I'll press your thanks button after i post my reply.
waiting eagerly for your reply...
not much problems.
for me, just the battery, some games doesn't run properly, the camera sometimes shows contrast line, and the radio is sucks.
overall, this ROM is perfect.
the overclock doesn't harm the processor.
it safe.
sent from Nokia 3310
Actually the overclocking kinda hurts the processor. Well since you push it over the limit it is used more so the life of the processor is getting shortened.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using Tapatalk
Whoa...new info for me.
Thanx dude..
But why the other ARM v6 have default cpu more than 600mhz?
It has the same processor isn't it?
sent from Nokia 3310
jrandroid said:
Is cm7 safe for daily use? the one made by sir Squadzone .. "especially for games" cause i really9x like his works..
Do you mind posting your opinions and experiences..
I really would love to hear from you guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not into 'games' so much.
But I've tried Fruit Ninja, Cut the Rope, NFS Shift. and it runs well.
I've used this ROM for almost a month, and I didn't see any bugs yet.
chepoz said:
Whoa...new info for me.
Thanx dude..
But why the other ARM v6 have default cpu more than 600mhz?
It has the same processor isn't it?
sent from Nokia 3310
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Give me an example of a phone that has ARM v6 that has more than 600 mhz by default
Netas3k said:
Actually the overclocking kinda hurts the processor. Well since you push it over the limit it is used more so the life of the processor is getting shortened.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes absolutely true
Netas3k said:
Give me an example of a phone that has ARM v6 that has more than 600 mhz by default
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S5830 galaxy ace
sent from Nokia 3310
Netas3k said:
Give me an example of a phone that has ARM v6 that has more than 600 mhz by default
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search Google..
O_O
samsung galaxy y its armv6 with 834MHZ....
Netas3k said:
Give me an example of a phone that has ARM v6 that has more than 600 mhz by default
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google it... O.-
chepoz said:
S5830 galaxy ace
sent from Nokia 3310
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true that galaxy ace have armv6..but it's not the same version as us..it is version 11..
Sent from public phone using 10cents.
Netas3k said:
Give me an example of a phone that has ARM v6 that has more than 600 mhz by default
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmmm... whether Gio and Ace is overclocked?
they have 800MHz ARM v6.
chepoz said:
S5830 galaxy ace
sent from Nokia 3310
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they are included in the armv6 family yes but still the do have set lifespan.
think of it as processor of desktop, (same facts actually about OC).
ex:
armv6 v8 = default 600mhz = 5 years lifespan
armv6 v11 = default 800mhz = 5 years lifespan
intel e2200 = default 2ghz = 5 years lifespan
intel e2100 = default 1.8 ghz = years lifespan
now both arms are in the same family and both desktop procies also, the difference is that in the architecture set they do have different default freq which are set by manufacturers to maintain stndard life.
now if you push the v8 to 800 it will lessen the lifespan, yes it will be the same freq as the v11 but due to the design it will not have the same lifespan if you OC'd it.
it can be the same theory on motorcycle engines,
example would be the xrm 125cc engine.
it you would like it to be as fast as a 150cc engine you have to bore the piston hole the same size as what the 150cc has and change the piston size and rings and the carbs. but doing this will also push the engine to its limits. why because the safe design of 125cc engines are set as 125. if you go any further you will have better performance but less lifespan and can cause the engine to break faster even with good maintenance.
like your body, example would be.
by default you can last 4 days without sleeping but all you have to do is watch tv ,but you can't last 4 days without sleeping if you will jog 5 km every morning.
astrayasagiri said:
they are included in the armv6 family yes but still the do have set lifespan.
think of it as processor of desktop, (same facts actually about OC).
ex:
armv6 v8 = default 600mhz = 5 years lifespan
armv6 v11 = default 800mhz = 5 years lifespan
intel e2200 = default 2ghz = 5 years lifespan
intel e2100 = default 1.8 ghz = years lifespan
now both arms are in the same family and both desktop procies also, the difference is that in the architecture set they do have different default freq which are set by manufacturers to maintain stndard life.
now if you push the v8 to 800 it will lessen the lifespan, yes it will be the same freq as the v11 but due to the design it will not have the same lifespan if you OC'd it.
it can be the same theory on motorcycle engines,
example would be the xrm 125cc engine.
it you would like it to be as fast as a 150cc engine you have to bore the piston hole the same size as what the 150cc has and change the piston size and rings and the carbs. but doing this will also push the engine to its limits. why because the safe design of 125cc engines are set as 125. if you go any further you will have better performance but less lifespan and can cause the engine to break faster even with good maintenance.
like your body, example would be.
by default you can last 4 days without sleeping but all you have to do is watch tv ,but you can't last 4 days without sleeping if you will jog 5 km every morning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nice example man..
Sent from public phone using 10cents.
astrayasagiri said:
they are included in the armv6 family yes but still the do have set lifespan.
think of it as processor of desktop, (same facts actually about OC).
ex:
armv6 v8 = default 600mhz = 5 years lifespan
armv6 v11 = default 800mhz = 5 years lifespan
intel e2200 = default 2ghz = 5 years lifespan
intel e2100 = default 1.8 ghz = years lifespan
now both arms are in the same family and both desktop procies also, the difference is that in the architecture set they do have different default freq which are set by manufacturers to maintain stndard life.
now if you push the v8 to 800 it will lessen the lifespan, yes it will be the same freq as the v11 but due to the design it will not have the same lifespan if you OC'd it.
it can be the same theory on motorcycle engines,
example would be the xrm 125cc engine.
it you would like it to be as fast as a 150cc engine you have to bore the piston hole the same size as what the 150cc has and change the piston size and rings and the carbs. but doing this will also push the engine to its limits. why because the safe design of 125cc engines are set as 125. if you go any further you will have better performance but less lifespan and can cause the engine to break faster even with good maintenance.
like your body, example would be.
by default you can last 4 days without sleeping but all you have to do is watch tv ,but you can't last 4 days without sleeping if you will jog 5 km every morning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome explanation.
So, if my arm v6 which is default 600mhz overclocked to 782, how much time left until it's "dead"?
sent from Nokia 3310
Related
Hi folks,
I was just wondering, what are everyone's speeds? I shall start first I have attached a screenshot of my voltages, speeds, and governor.
WARNING : I TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGE YOUR NOOK MIGHT INCUR AS A RESULT OF TRYING ANY OF OVERCLOCK CONFIGURATIONS MENTIONED HERE.
Quick note - i would strongly suggest backing your CPU down to a max of 1200Mhz. For some reason, any speed above that will tank your GPU performance (by as much as half); the additional 100Mhz CPU loss isn't really felt (especially with the GPU gains).
Divine_Madcat said:
Quick note - i would strongly suggest backing your CPU down to a max of 1200Mhz. For some reason, any speed above that will tank your GPU performance (by as much as half); the additional 100Mhz CPU loss isn't really felt (especially with the GPU gains).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there anyway to confirm this? How can I measure GPU performance?
I set mine at 1200MHz and didn't bother playing with cpu voltage.
PoisonWolf said:
Is there anyway to confirm this? How can I measure GPU performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has been well confirmed in severl threads (Cm7 dev and general), but you can easily test yourself with nenamark 1. Set your clocks to 1200, and run the bench; then set your clocks to 1300, run again (and watch your framerate plummet).
Divine_Madcat said:
It has been well confirmed in severl threads (Cm7 dev and general), but you can easily test yourself with nenamark 1. Set your clocks to 1200, and run the bench; then set your clocks to 1300, run again (and watch your framerate plummet).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried your little scenario of dropping down to 1125mhz and running nenamark. I was 14.8 running 1125mhz and at 15.6 at 1300mhz. I am running chainfire plug ins.
Sent with my Nook, paid the $Buck for XDA Premium—you should 2!
And what do those numbers mean?
14.8 is better or worse compared to 15.6?
Hindle1225 said:
I tried your little scenario of dropping down to 1125mhz and running nenamark. I was 14.8 running 1125mhz and at 15.6 at 1300mhz. I am running chainfire plug ins.
Sent with my Nook, paid the $Buck for XDA Premium—you should 2!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Odd.. i can get 21 Fps at @1200.. i would have expected the 1125 to be around the same; though the 1300 sounds right on.
I got 16.3 fps using my current setup. Lawl. What part of android uses 3d acceleration anyway?
PoisonWolf said:
I got 16.3 fps using my current setup. Lawl. What part of android uses 3d acceleration anyway?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
UH.. android, not alot, but pretty much any game (or even some web browsers like Opera). Its easy to "lawl", but it actually DOES matter...
Divine_Madcat said:
UH.. android, not alot, but pretty much any game (or even some web browsers like Opera). Its easy to "lawl", but it actually DOES matter...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good point however I don't play any games that uses 3d. I don't really play any games. Just browsing with dolphin and lots of email.
I will take it down per notch as per your suggestion once I update to a newer version though.
Also, some of the framerate difference may come from you running the 32bit framebuffer kernel, instead of the faster 16bit (but if you don't game alot, you may not really need it anyway).
Scratch that. I just tested it. I got 22.9fps. Lawl. I am now tweaking it again. What are your voltages?
Thanks for the suggestion again. 1200 MHz Max for me.
P.s. how do I check which framerate buffer am I running?
PoisonWolf said:
Good point however I don't play any games that uses 3d. I don't really play any games. Just browsing with dolphin and lots of email.
I will take it down per notch as per your suggestion once I update to a newer version though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u don't play any games, then why to bother for the 3D loss of 1300mhz?
I would prefer to use the extra speed.
RASTAVIPER said:
If u don't play any games, then why to bother for the 3D loss of 1300mhz?
I would prefer to use the extra speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Frankly, i am under the personal impression that overall the system is more responsive at 1200, and that is not just the GPU. Something about that speed is the sweet spot.
And really.. only rarely will a system that does web pages and email hit max speed anyway... why not opt for a better all around performance, rather than an immeasurable CPU gain?
I know this could be kind of off topic, but what battery temperatures do you guys get when overclocking? because the other day mine was at 36 Celsius overclocked at 1200, Does anyone knows of a safe temperature range?
Mine hovers around 34 to 36. My hd2 goes up to 43 and that is fine too. Honestly, I would think that as long as it is under 40 you should not worth.
I use 300 min and 1200 max and have the governor set to on demand. No issues with this setting.
300 - .8125
600 - 1.0
800 - 1.1875
1100 - 1.25
1200 - 1.2875
Haven't used it much recently, but about 5% drain for 24 hours in sleep. I need to put it through some heavy use to see how bad I can kill the battery.
biohazrd51 said:
1200 - .8125
1100 - 1.0
800 - 1.1875
600 - 1.25
300 - 1.2875
Haven't used it much recently, but about 5% drain for 24 hours in sleep. I need to put it through some heavy use to see how bad I can kill the battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You probably got the voltages reversed. Not possible to run 300 mhz on 1.2875. Lawl.
patruns said:
I use 300 min and 1200 max and have the governor set to on demand. No issues with this setting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was my initial setting as well (with the exception of running the max at 1300mhz). However, I realized that it wasn't the max speed that was the issue, I found out that increasing the lower-steppings was key in increasing the overall fluidity of the device as the interactive governor ramped through the steppings.
I've just flashed emanoN v3, it has No-Frills CPU control app by default, I used this app to set my CPU like this: Max 710Mhz, Min 245Mhz, Governor performance, I/O scheduler deadline --> Apply on Boot.
But is it me or it doesn't make any work on my Galaxy mini? I still get lag on many games like when not overclocked!
should i use chain fire 3D?
[Sorry 4 my bad English ]
Try other governors and reset your phone after making changes.
Khanate said:
Try other governors and reset your phone after making changes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did, but
should I use chainfire3d instead of NO-Frills ?
Chainfire 3D is graphics tool for better optimization of games and other 3D apps.
Did you check Apply on boot option?
as in my question: I checked Apply on boot option
If OC doesnt make any work on galaxymini, why did they add it in custom ROM 4 galaxymini?
Try other rom like CM 7.2 overclocking worked for me.
why doesn't the OC make any work on Noname ??!!
A tried over-clocking a couple of times but I really didn't feel the difference, except the battery drain, of course. Now-a-days, I don't even care to over-clock.
I am having my mini with cm7.1.0 music edition and overclocked it to 782 MHz and I find that in set CPU native benchmark I found that it took 900 micro second less when I clocked it to 782 MHz so I can say that Oct really works it also make my device run more smoothly its true that some games like angry birds lags yet after oc
boaxfux said:
A tried over-clocking a couple of times but I really didn't feel the difference, except the battery drain, of course. Now-a-days, I don't even care to over-clock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe ur device has power enough to play many games that requires high-end hw, maybe not
but I wanna push my galaxy mini to play the effing awesome games just like the other high-end devices
dhlalit11 said:
I am having my mini with cm7.1.0 music edition and overclocked it to 782 MHz and I find that in set CPU native benchmark I found that it took 900 micro second less when I clocked it to 782 MHz so I can say that Oct really works it also make my device run more smoothly its true that some games like angry birds lags yet after oc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OC can improve device's performance, but that improvement was identified by ur own experiences or measurement software?
that's right, I've got lag in angry birds even after OC
my phone is OCed at 782mhz and it's lag free everything works flawlessly...
M1hai said:
my phone is OCed at 782mhz and it's lag free everything works flawlessly...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ur phone is Galaxy mini ?!
I also OC my CM7.0.2 RC2 with 782 OC kernel. Got 1837 score on Antutu Benchmark. Love it.
fueart said:
I also OC my CM7.0.2 RC2 with 782 OC kernel. Got 1837 score on Antutu Benchmark. Love it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its really helps ur device improve its performance? did u check with some HD games?
kynam91 said:
its really helps ur device improve its performance? did u check with some HD games?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many games are tailored towards devices with 1Ghz processors and newer (including dualcore and advanced GPU's like the Tegra2 and Exynos chipsets). Don't expect the latest games to run reliably on a sub-800Mhz singlecore device.
Apps that require Chainfire3D are unlikely to work very well at all on the SGM as they're generally aimed at the higher-performance devices.
If you want to see the difference an overclock makes, then run an AnTuTu CPU benchmark before & after overclocking. If the figure doesn't change much (You should expect an increase roughly relative to the % of the overclock) then something isn't working correctly.
I can play Need For Speed Shift without any lag
fueart said:
I can play Need For Speed Shift without any lag
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lucky u! I wish I could
knightnz said:
Many games are tailored towards devices with 1Ghz processors and newer (including dualcore and advanced GPU's like the Tegra2 and Exynos chipsets). Don't expect the latest games to run reliably on a sub-800Mhz singlecore device.
Apps that require Chainfire3D are unlikely to work very well at all on the SGM as they're generally aimed at the higher-performance devices.
If you want to see the difference an overclock makes, then run an AnTuTu CPU benchmark before & after overclocking. If the figure doesn't change much (You should expect an increase roughly relative to the % of the overclock) then something isn't working correctly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup! I just expect the Oc makes change that I can feel thru my own experiences! I dont want to see a good result on Antutu then THINK my device has better performance!!! U know what I mean?
btw, just looked ur signature, u r a serious guy, arent u? haha! It's a cooler way (that's what they thought) to write, why so serious
We are lucky because s5570 is equipted with gpu. Why dont you try using cm7.2 oc with 782 kernel. Plus a2sd and v6 supercharger.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA App
hello guys..i heard that galaxy note and other samsung device are using an outdated GPU (Mali-400MP GPU)...so is it a little "fail" for our note to have an outdated GPU?plss give ur opinion.. thanks guys
..u can read the review about the GPU--> Here
It's so much faster than the sgx540 in the nexus it's ridiculous and since my choice was between those two I'm very happy with it.
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Check out the real world performances. Mali 400 outclasses Adreno 220 easily.
The weakpoint of Mali is geometry performance, but it does not matter much with mobiles until now as mobile games are not geometry heavy.
On the other hand, the OpenGL ES 2.x performance and real world performance of Mali is excellent.
With the clock speed of exynos in Note which actually gives much better real world performance with Mali 400 than even SGS2, it runs circles around Adreno 220 powered devices like sensation and even SGX540 powered devices.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4686/samsung-galaxy-s-2-international-review-the-best-redefined/17
The above review is of SGS2. And mind you the performance of note is much better than SGS2. It is one of the most balanced GPUs on market with great gaming as well as multimedia performance (which actually matters more to someone like me.)
Funkym0nkey said:
Check out the real world performances. Mali 400 outclasses Adreno 220 easily.
The weakpoint of Mali is geometry performance, but it does not matter much with mobiles until now as mobile games are not geometry heavy.
On the other hand, the OpenGL ES 2.x performance and real world performance of Mali is excellent.
With the clock speed of exynos in Note which actually gives much better real world performance with Mali 400 than even SGS2, it runs circles around Adreno 220 powered devices like sensation and even SGX540 powered devices.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4686/samsung-galaxy-s-2-international-review-the-best-redefined/17
The above review is of SGS2. And mind you the performance of note is much better than SGS2. It is one of the most balanced GPUs on market with great gaming as well as multimedia performance (which actually matters more to someone like me.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for this info sir
although mali has been here for a very long time, it was well ahead of its time. and it still is i guess
anjath said:
although mali has been here for a very long time, it was well ahead of its time. and it still is i guess
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah well Scott Adams is wayyyyyyy past his heyday (heck, even being relevant).... haven't read him since 2007 or so, when he started dabbling in intelligent design woo and sexist claptrap...
for being a heavy mobile gamer
i can assure you that the mali 400 on the note does very well with the latest games (asphalt7, dead trigger to name a few) despite having to compute for a much higher resolution display than other phones...
and with a little overclocking (tegrak app or gl notecore kernel) gpu performance can get sky high.
best phone i ever got :victory:
GAME ON said:
hello guys..i heard that galaxy note and other samsung device are using an outdated GPU (Mali-400MP GPU)...so is it a little "fail" for our note to have an outdated GPU?plss give ur opinion.. thanks guys
..u can read the review about the GPU--> Here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The note was released ten months ago but still its gpu is better than all the others except sgs3 and and maybe one x..
Btw do you even own a note?? Did you every notice any lag in any game??
Whiskeyjack4855 said:
The note was released ten months ago but still its gpu is better than all the others except sgs3 and and maybe one x..
Btw do you even own a note?? Did you every notice any lag in any game??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The NOTE's and SGS3's GPU are the same.
However, the S3 is built on a smaller 32nm die-size, so it means it uses less space and less power for same performance. Samsung uses this advantage to clock the frequency much higher than the NOTE (which is built on a 45nm die).
Also, the S3 implements a new, updated driver for the gpu and squeezes more performance out. This was a same move Samsung made with the SGX540, which is also a very fast gpu. The original SGS was clocked real-low and had outdated drivers... after stealing the driver sources from the LG with OMAP 4440 SoC, the SGS (with 4.0.3) was performing in the same league as the 2011/2012 devices.
Kangal said:
The NOTE's and SGS3's GPU are the same.
However, the S3 is built on a smaller 32nm die-size, so it means it uses less space and less power for same performance. Samsung uses this advantage to clock the frequency much higher than the NOTE (which is built on a 45nm die).
Also, the S3 implements a new, updated driver for the gpu and squeezes more performance out. This was a same move Samsung made with the SGX540, which is also a very fast gpu. The original SGS was clocked real-low and had outdated drivers... after stealing the driver sources from the LG with OMAP 4440 SoC, the SGS (with 4.0.3) was performing in the same league as the 2011/2012 devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know that that both the note and sgs3 has same gpu.. But the one in sgs3 its more powerful cause you said it's overclocked and has better drivers..
Btw do you know why the mali in sgs3 gets so high benchmark scores even wih the 720p screen? I mean is it all due to oc and better drivers?
Whiskeyjack4855 said:
I know that that both the note and sgs3 has same gpu.. But the one in sgs3 its more powerful cause you said it's overclocked and has better drivers..
Btw do you know why the mali in sgs3 gets so high benchmark scores even wih the 720p screen? I mean is it all due to oc and better drivers?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better drivers + a little O'C makes the overwhelming difference.
I mean the NOTE comes with *only* 2 cores and *slow* gpu... after I customized it, its running toe-to-toe with the HTC One X (Tegra3).
An easier way to understand is to look at the new RIM PlayBook.
It's got the same processor as the Gnex (Galaxy Nexus) however its much much faster, especially in browsing. It decimates it. It even decimates the ASUS Transformer Prime Infinity (O'C Tegra3 + ICS).... or the Nexus7 (U'C Tegra3 + JBean).
You are only as fast as your slowest component. In the case of Android, its the high-level (slow) implemented software.
= Getting a faster soc with more cores and more ram doesn't really increase performance that much.
Some serious thread necromancy going on here!
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Kangal said:
Better drivers + a little O'C makes the overwhelming difference.
I mean the NOTE comes with *only* 2 cores and *slow* gpu... after I customized it, its running toe-to-toe with the HTC One X (Tegra3).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By toe to toe with the one x do you mean benchmarks or real life perfomance..
Hey one thing more..aren't you a engadget reader?
Whiskeyjack4855 said:
By toe to toe with the one x do you mean benchmarks or real life perfomance..
Hey one thing more..aren't you a engadget reader?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both.
But I don't live by the benchmarks. I mean have you tried some of the HD Apps from TegraZone. On stock TouchWizz, the NOTE really struggles. With a custom setup, I don't get much/any problems.
Yeah, I do frequent engadget... also on heaps of other sites.
Kangal said:
Both.
But I don't live by the benchmarks. I mean have you tried some of the HD Apps from TegraZone. On stock TouchWizz, the NOTE really struggles. With a custom setup, I don't get much/any problems.
Yeah, I do frequent engadget... also on heaps of other sites.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you be kind enough to educate me about your setup?
Kangal said:
Better drivers + a little O'C makes the overwhelming difference.
I mean the NOTE comes with *only* 2 cores and *slow* gpu... after I customized it, its running toe-to-toe with the HTC One X (Tegra3).
An easier way to understand is to look at the new RIM PlayBook.
It's got the same processor as the Gnex (Galaxy Nexus) however its much much faster, especially in browsing. It decimates it. It even decimates the ASUS Transformer Prime Infinity (O'C Tegra3 + ICS).... or the Nexus7 (U'C Tegra3 + JBean).
You are only as fast as your slowest component. In the case of Android, its the high-level (slow) implemented software.
= Getting a faster soc with more cores and more ram doesn't really increase performance that much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. Even though the Playbook has its many flaws (owned two both with screen/USB issues) it was a powerhouse. Multimedia was outstanding and web surfing was by far the fastest.
But the OS, QNX, is to thank for that. If the Playbook was running android it would be nothing out of the ordinary. As much as I love Android it really is not as efficiant as QNX
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
anything on market today is outdated tommorow
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Recently I had a doubt about if it's possible to unlock the 2 locked remaining cores in the Galaxy Note N7000? Because I realize that the Note only uses 2 of the 4 GPU cores... It's there a possibility to do this? How?
i think mali 400 is a good GPU because Note1 and Note2 using it. and really nice GPU for gaming
It is possible to set x8 cpu to 1000 Mhz? I have read that yes. So how?
NO WAY.......!
Impossible
This is impossible... well.. Without melting the CPU or burning your phone... to death...
---------- Post added at 12:12 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 AM ----------
This is because the X8 have a ArmV6 processor... which seems to have a max of 864mhz clock speed... and IDK people that can run at that clock...
ArmV7 can be overclocked to 1GHz thought...
amieow98 said:
[/COLOR]This is because the X8 have a ArmV6 processor... which seems to have a max of 864mhz clock speed... and IDK people that can run at that clock...
ArmV7 can be overclocked to 1GHz thought...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The processor architecture is not related to its speed.
Just because it's an ARMv6 it doesn't mean its maximum speed is 8xx Mhz.. You can have ARMv6 chips running at 2Ghz if they were made to run at those speeds..
The one on our phones starts failing at 8xx Mhz, and that also depends on the silicon quality of the chip you got..
About ARMv7.. You have chips on the market running way above 1Ghz
Sent from the bathroom using the toilet
yes, I've tried that by mistake ......I've got endless FC to the point that I cant use my phone... So I re flashed my my rom again....
That is way pushing more to what your device can do.
I suggest you wouldnt try if you still want your x8 alive.
Well, the hardware doesn't support it
Our phone is stable at 600 MHz
But support at least 825
There are limits,only a dual core phone could run that frequency without exploding....
Sent from my X8 using XDA
leroy_coco said:
Well, the hardware doesn't support it
Our phone is stable at 600 MHz
But support at least 825
There are limits,only a dual core phone could run that frequency without exploding....
Sent from my X8 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
arm7 CPUs can [email protected] 1ghz and most of single cores can even go up [email protected] 1.5ghz
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
faraz_fireboy said:
army CPUs can [email protected] 1ghz and most of single cores can even go up [email protected] 1.5ghz
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
army grade (or military grade) products are a tad different including material and producting quality. But most of them are easyli replaceable as well...
Or if you ment arm cpu-s, well that could be done. If you can add quality cooling, plus voltage, a bit different architecture (which is at producting) they can. There are x86 CPU-s that can run at 4-5 GHz overclocked when they are stable at 3 Ghz. But they are cooled quite heavily and not to mention overvolted.
Our CPU-s manufatcure and basic, the design and required materials are for 600Mhz (with engeneering offset of 1.2 maybe) If the material quality and the casing is good, they can be overclocked with the "default" options (such as heat transfer -cooling-, voltage and current).
I can belive that the cpu of our phone can reach 1 Ghz, but not in our phone and not in manufacturer default settings.
Ken-Shi_Kun said:
army grade (or military grade) products are a tad different including material and producting quality. But most of them are easyli replaceable as well...
Or if you ment arm cpu-s, well that could be done. If you can add quality cooling, plus voltage, a bit different architecture (which is at producting) they can. There are x86 CPU-s that can run at 4-5 GHz overclocked when they are stable at 3 Ghz. But they are cooled quite heavily and not to mention overvolted.
Our CPU-s manufatcure and basic, the design and required materials are for 600Mhz (with engeneering offset of 1.2 maybe) If the material quality and the casing is good, they can be overclocked with the "default" options (such as heat transfer -cooling-, voltage and current).
I can belive that the cpu of our phone can reach 1 Ghz, but not in our phone and not in manufacturer default settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tnx for the post but
it was a writing mistake of go keyboard...I meant to say arm7 instead of Army...
Really sorry about that
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
Yes it can reach 1ghz maybe but just in laboratory conditions and in control of experts...
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
faraz_fireboy said:
Yes it can reach 1ghz maybe but just in laboratory conditions and in control of experts...
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup.. With proper voltage and heat dissipation it would be possible.
To everyone saying that if you do an extreme overclock, the cpu will burn, get on fire, melt the pcb, explode.. Please stop watching scifi movies. If the frequency is too high, it will just freeze or not turn on at all.. No harm will be done. The only thing that can harm it is by giving it more voltage, but even that won't leave any physical marks.
Sent from the bathroom using the toilet
faraz_fireboy said:
arm7 CPUs can [email protected] 1ghz and most of single cores can even go up [email protected] 1.5ghz
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read thar xperia mini/pro/active/live/ray's cpu can be overclocked from 1ghz to 2ghz
I have a real proof that armv6 can go above 1ghz.I could do that on my previous phone,samsung galaxy 3.
Galaxy 3 has samsungs processor clocked on 667 mhz.and when I flashed my custom rom I was suprised when I could overclock it to 1400mhz.yes,I said 1.4 ghz.and I thought that ill have reboots,freezes,and that the phone wil overheat and such...but no.pure speed.temperature was around 28 degrees.
How much you can overclock is mostly in cpu company.and in our case,quallcom is one of the worst.it may could be overclocked to 1ghz,but it would need much hardware hacking.
sent from no lag xperia x8 while listening DuBsTeP and having eargasms
Just asking....
Do anyone think it was posibble to change the cpu from armv6 to armv7 on X8
well i am new here.......
BeeWare said:
Do anyone think it was posibble to change the cpu from armv6 to armv7 on X8
well i am new here.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no
impossible
its impossible you can never set 1ghz or more:crying:
you can but it won't be stable. period.
sgt. meow said:
you can but it won't be stable. period.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
unstable....overheating melting destruction of connectors...........lol
I think u can do it by super cooling, and have to hack the system. But it would be better if u buy a dual core phone
sent from my mango
So I managed to overclock the phone to the max 2,1ghz . But the things that scare are the following: I make it 1,7ghz or 1,6ghz , I do antutu benchmark and I get 4500+ points . Then at 2,1ghz I do the benchmark again but I get 2500 . How is that possible and what is the explanation ? I tried making both min and max freq at 2,1 . I tried with min at 100,200,400 but the same happens. 1,7 is pretty good but 2,1 is lame. I have to tweak the governors ? I tried multiple combinations too, Ondemand,Interactive most that are in devil kernel + Sio,CFQ,Zen. If someone can tell me how is it possible for 2,1 ghz to be slower than 1,6/7 i will be very thankful.
The processor is more prone to errors at higher clock speed? Error correction skews things down? Mebbe. . .
Sent from my Apple IIe
billyjed said:
The processor is more prone to errors at higher clock speed? Error correction skews things down? Mebbe. . .
Sent from my Apple IIe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A bit more explanation would be appreciated.
Im goiing to sound old here...
Its like having an old LP Record you know, one of those black round Disc shaped things that was used to play music.
They had little grooves on them that if you played it fast enough they would skip over the lines and the songs would jump
Thats like the OC the higher you go the system cant handle it... also the battery will drain faster and will heat up hotter
Hope that helps
EwOkie said:
Im goiing to sound old here...
Its like having an old LP Record you know, one of those black round Disc shaped things that was used to play music.
They had little grooves on them that if you played it fast enough they would skip over the lines and the songs would jump
Thats like the OC the higher you go the system cant handle it... also the battery will drain faster and will heat up hotter
Hope that helps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for explanation
juz like skipping ur breakfast before competing in 7.5km marathon! Ur not gonna feel light n run faster here, u ll be worst! and most worst could happen when u could die pushing ur limit here!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
McXeno said:
So I managed to overclock the phone to the max 2,1ghz . But the things that scare are the following: I make it 1,7ghz or 1,6ghz , I do antutu benchmark and I get 4500+ points . Then at 2,1ghz I do the benchmark again but I get 2500 . How is that possible and what is the explanation ? I tried making both min and max freq at 2,1 . I tried with min at 100,200,400 but the same happens. 1,7 is pretty good but 2,1 is lame. I have to tweak the governors ? I tried multiple combinations too, Ondemand,Interactive most that are in devil kernel + Sio,CFQ,Zen. If someone can tell me how is it possible for 2,1 ghz to be slower than 1,6/7 i will be very thankful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also check the 2d and 3d score... the higher you go with overclock, the lower will be your 2d and 3d score, maybe because of the higher voltage for the cpu the gpu doesn't have enough power to work properly
ktulu84 said:
also check the 2d and 3d score... the higher you go with overclock, the lower will be your 2d and 3d score, maybe because of the higher voltage for the cpu the gpu doesn't have enough power to work properly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
normally, cpu score will increase while other aspect decrease when ur OC as u only OC ur CPU, not RAM or SD speed.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app