I think honeycomb will fit better on our device. .. So if anybody can do a port,just make it!
Thanks
ptcptc said:
I think honeycomb will fit better on our device. .. So if anybody can do a port,just make it!
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the official ICS update coming soonish, that sounds like an extremely pointless exercise if you ask me
ptcptc said:
I think honeycomb will fit better on our device. .. So if anybody can do a port,just make it!
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That just seems to be quite rude request/command :-/
It'll be pointless seeing as ICS is around the corner.
Another thing you might not have known about: Honeycomb's source has yet to be released still (as far as I can recall).
I do however look forward to seeing the tablet friendly look of ICS on out Notes
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
One post on the record! Why bother even replying to this fool? One post! So this person didnt have a clue about anything
While your at it a WP7 port too plz.
Thx.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
And I'd love a windows 95 port too.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Look...all i wanted to know if it can be done,ok?
I just like honeycomb more than ics...
I tried the cm9 ics...and i have returned to gb...
I'm bored of the same ui...and hc has a pretty different ui...
tablet mode of ICS is HC with enhanced graphics/features for the most part.
Other than icons didn't notice much upgrading my tablet from HC to ICS, but it is beautiful
DarkShot666 said:
It'll be pointless seeing as ICS is around the corner.
Another thing you might not have known about: Honeycomb's source has yet to be released still (as far as I can recall).
I do however look forward to seeing the tablet friendly look of ICS on out Notes
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App[/
honeycomb source was part of the source code released when ICS Source was released as of now all Android Source Code is out... until they start working on the follow up to ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ptcptc said:
I think honeycomb will fit better on our device. .. So if anybody can do a port,just make it!
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I need the Full Bloated Windows 8 Ultimate X64 to be ported to Note right now.
I will pay you nothing to do it, and I'm making a very reasonable request.
Go buy a HTC and be happy..
ptcptc said:
Look...all i wanted to know if it can be done,ok?
I just like honeycomb more than ics...
I tried the cm9 ics...and i have returned to gb...
I'm bored of the same ui...and hc has a pretty different ui...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Having wrestled with the 30% increase in power consumption of ics on my galaxy note for the past month want to know how to role back to 2.3.6 :-Q
Related
Not sure if this goes here or not, but has anyone seen this today? I am surprised that it has not been talked about in here. Has anyone tried it yet?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=842159
Its full of bugs and there is not a re-orient kernel for it yet. Its not ready for primetime yet, unfortunately .
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Posting a re-oriented kernel shortly. Sound through headphones doesn't seem to work. Most everything else does. The whole still beta thing definitely applies.
personally I am hoping that nexus S turns out to be pretty similiar to the Galaxy S. With the source and a good base I think we are more likely to get a 2.3 version of CM before 2.2
is CM6 gonna be that much better for our phones?
moosefist said:
personally I am hoping that nexus S turns out to be pretty similiar to the Galaxy S. With the source and a good base I think we are more likely to get a 2.3 version of CM before 2.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I'm pretty sure they are almost exactly the same phone, I really doubt we're going to get source anytime soon. They are a couple of weeks away from a CM 6.1 beta release. It will have alot of the same issues the i9k roms do, but it should work well enough for most people.
I'm just glad Cyanogen has shown interest in the Galaxy S. That makes me feel like we'll see continued development, in addition to all the great devs already here for the Galaxy S series.
h8rift said:
Its full of bugs and there is not a re-orient kernel for it yet. Its not ready for primetime yet, unfortunately .
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
xcaliberinhand's kernel should work.... as long as its a I9000 kernel I don't think there would be a problem, except for the already known issues.
joedon3 said:
xcaliberinhand's kernel should work.... as long as its a I9000 kernel I don't think there would be a problem, except for the already known issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it won't. You have to use the one that glitterballs made from xcaliberinhands source and cyanogenmods kernel combined. The base i9k kernel won't work properly. Too many Samsung hooks in it I guess.
SiL3nTKiLL said:
is CM6 gonna be that much better for our phones?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cyanogen's appeal isn't just the ROM, there are tons of ROM builders. The Cyanogen team actually modifies the Android source quite a bit. (more so than some of the other tweaks found in some ROMs)
I don't understand. Why would this be mentioned in the Captivate section of this site? What does this mean for Captivate users?
TheShamsMan said:
I don't understand. Why would this be mentioned in the Captivate section of this site? What does this mean for Captivate users?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because we can now get an idea on what needs to change to port this over to the captivate, such as now you can install cm using this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=842488
TheShamsMan said:
I don't understand. Why would this be mentioned in the Captivate section of this site? What does this mean for Captivate users?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cause if CM can be re-oriented, we are going to get a much more powerful build than the our current Official/Modified ROMs
XGX5309 said:
I'm just glad Cyanogen has shown interest in the Galaxy S. That makes me feel like we'll see continued development, in addition to all the great devs already here for the Galaxy S series.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was actually Aery and a few other i9000 devs, cyanogen actually had nothing to do with this port. Not really super important but I am a fan of credit where credit is due.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
amtrakcn said:
Cause if CM can be re-oriented, we are going to get a much more powerful build than the our current Official/Modified ROMs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for the noob question, but what does re-oriented mean
chipsa964 said:
Sorry for the noob question, but what does re-oriented mean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
replace the word re-oriented with the word change... it just means the changed a few things to make it compatible with our phone.
chipsa964 said:
Sorry for the noob question, but what does re-oriented mean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha, good question. I think it's when you modify a kernel to work for another device. So, you would re-orient a I9000 kernel to work on a Captivate. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. Better yet, elaborate if I'm right.
skinien said:
haha, good question. I think it's when you modify a kernel to work for another device. So, you would re-orient a I9000 kernel to work on a Captivate. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. Better yet, elaborate if I'm right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm fairly certain the name derives from the fact that an i9000 ROM would be rotated 90 degrees without it.
chipsa964 said:
Sorry for the noob question, but what does re-oriented mean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's means the screen rotates the correct way. Instead of flipping 180...
cropythy said:
It was actually Aery and a few other i9000 devs, cyanogen actually had nothing to do with this port. Not really super important but I am a fan of credit where credit is due.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm with you on the credit. Let me tell you, I am using this rom on my wife's Aria. The prospect of having it on the Cappy excites me.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Now LG say 2.3 after the summer on swedish site
That must be a joke,
but by the way... i'm sure lg will bring android 2.3 to the 2x when cyanogen brought 3.1 alread!
There is no CM 3.1 ROM, Honeycomb is still closed source.
Rusty! said:
There is no CM 3.1 ROM, Honeycomb is still closed source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure he means, that by the time 3.1 (Or really ICS, 'cause HC isn't going to be opensourced) has been turned into a CM release, LG might release GB
When they realese it then CM8 would come with Ice Cream Sandwich!
I am just joking.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using Tapatalk
hmmm why this thread is in dev section
winzhangout said:
Now LG say 2.3 after the summer on swedish site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bet it do. Why? Because after the summer can be in 20 years. Still after the summer this year, now isnt it?
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
I hope the waiting is worth it....
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
ilos said:
hmmm why this thread is in dev section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Wrong section - stop replying people, thread needs to die.
Why is there yet another thread about this???
We all know it was delayed, and I think more and more people know it won't come at all.
I got 2 email replies from LG. The first one said the update will come after summer for sure. The second one said there is no precise date for the update, not even after summer.
So to sum up:
n°1 LG is telling us all to go **** ourselves on this one
n°2 It's useless to open a new thread every time LG tells us to go **** ourselves
n°3 LG is ****ing ****
Froyo -> Gingerbread upgrade is not all that big. Most of you won't even know its running gingerbread vs froyo. Not sure what the big deal is.
its not about the software update, we have CM7 for that.
Its about the kernel update that we want from gingerbread.
And also, are you kidding? "most of you want know the difference" ? where do you think you are? this is XDA why do you think where here?
mintvilla said:
its not about the software update, we have CM7 for that.
Its about the kernel update that we want from gingerbread.
And also, are you kidding? "most of you want know the difference" ? where do you think you are? this is XDA why do you think where here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure most of the people *****ing about it want it for the sake of having the number "2.3" written on the version screen as oppose to "2.2.2". What will gingerbread let you do that you can't do now?
If you're having issues with the phone (reboots/freezes etc) then fair enough otherwise just chill. It's just a phone.
I had a HTC Legend before Optimus 2X. And when the stable cm7 rom was running in my phone it was WAY faster then with any stable custom Froyo-rom. And 2.3 looks very nice. 2.3 also has the Screen-off animation, and a function to select text in messages and on webpages to easier copy, edit or delete parts.
Thats what I can remember I miss atm..
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA Premium App
mintvilla said:
its not about the software update, we have CM7 for that.
Its about the kernel update that we want from gingerbread.
And also, are you kidding? "most of you want know the difference" ? where do you think you are? this is XDA why do you think where here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah you're right, we need the kernel to produce better and stable CM7s or other gingerbread builds >< If only we could get our hands on one single Optimus 2x kernel source code ><
Dont know if you have tried CM7 lately but its VERY stable, at this point the only thing we need LG to fix is maybe the battery drivers
mauaus said:
Dont know if you have tried CM7 lately but its VERY stable, at this point the only thing we need LG to fix is maybe the battery drivers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah the battery drain issues ><
Gb will surely bring a lot of stuff to o2x as I understand. Most important imho proper use of dual core and gtalk videochat. Guess a lot of people will notice the speed improvements at least.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using Tapatalk
winzhangout said:
Now LG say 2.3 after the summer on swedish site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to my carrier here in NZ (2degrees), the gingerbread update for the O2x will be out by end of October 2011. Link here
mauaus said:
Dont know if you have tried CM7 lately but its VERY stable, at this point the only thing we need LG to fix is maybe the battery drivers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I almost agree.... cm7 rocks and no point at all using standard rom however the battery aint so bad is it? I manage live wallpaper, fair usage on wifi, 3g and 3 hours a day audiobook ( yes works tough going lol )baseband/rij 725 and she lasts a day no problem ........ if you think thats bad you should try my wifes iphone 3gs!!!
edit:- lcd brightness is also up full tilt
edit again.... why doesnt lg/htc/etc etc hire the cm devs? as far as im aware they dont get paid much if anything other than the odd donation and a new phone here and there for a hell of a lot of work.... surely if anyone should be doing the official roms its people like them who love their work?
Anyone else looking forward to it?
Is it going to be released on the SGS 1? I get the feeling there won't be an official release of it for it but will anyone be making a custom rom?
shifty39 said:
Anyone else looking forward to it?
Is it going to be released on the SGS 1? I get the feeling there won't be an official release of it for it but will anyone be making a custom rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No offending intended but you should see the threads here, more. Than10 threads are already here asking the exact same question. And i dont think any member xan answer this question for you, only samsung and google can and they will on 19th so please wait till then.
hit thankxx if i helped. sent from my mind through telepathy (ya its possible)!
Yeah hope so..or the developers will port it..
spikydoc said:
Yeah hope so..or the developers will port it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have no doubt that the galaxy s devs will make a port for our i9000's, i mean if theres a friggin honeycomb port, it just makes sense that they would bring us some delicious ice cream sandwich.
yes i am! i Even made a rom in ice style but i am not able to post it because i am new on the forum
Thats Awesome
I read somewhere ICS will be available to any gingerbread running device!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXihfs7DKPE
Watch this video. The presenter is saying clearly that this next version will be made available for every phone from new to old. So, expect it on SGS. However, the question is that whether it will run smoothly or not ?
Here are some demo features that will come out in ICS.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCIaTmGvXJE
cool
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Google has made very clear that most fevices running gb will run ics.
now its just samsung who need to decide our future.
sent from the beast known as samsung galaxy s. ;-)
BHuvan goyal said:
Google has made very clear that most fevices running gb will run ics.
now its just samsung who need to decide our future.
sent from the beast known as samsung galaxy s. ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not only our future, their future
do we have any news??
this sdk dump is here
http://www.androidcentral.com/ice-cream-sandwich-sdk-system-dump-available-devs-and-themers-get-it
all the devices that had a gingerbread update would receive the update for 4.0 as well .. don't panic and let's just hope for the best!
I belive there isn't much ram on sgs to run ICS
And anyway, we have CyanogenMod. It will surely be updated to ICS.
One way or another we will get it.
How relatively well it will run on our device is another matter.
Hmm, can't wait for the Icecream Sandwich.
virgiliu said:
I belive there isn't much ram on sgs to run ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agreed. There is hardly even enough ram for gingerbread to run as smoothly as froyo.
Android developers claimed today that ics is lighter and snappier. So i guess that means it will require less ram then gb. Its newer version so it is obvious they tried to make it lighter.
sent from the beast known as samsung galaxy s. ;-)
I`am real excited about this rom and i think others are too so i can imagine people having questions.
Don`t want to clutter up the dev section so i took the liberty to create this thread so people can exchange and share all kind of CM9 related stuff if you want
Will it have all of the S-pen functionality and the Samsung S- apps? Like S-memo?
Samsung hasn't developed the S pen ability on ICS yet, so it will take a while .
I'm not touching a ROM unless it's official.
Maybe I've grown up, but flashing ****ty buggy ROMs is not for me anymore.
bharat4ever said:
Samsung hasn't developed the S pen ability on ICS yet, so it will take a while .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that insider info
bharat4ever said:
Samsung hasn't developed the S pen ability on ICS yet, so it will take a while .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the S-Pen SDK is available. Don't know if that helps, but... Yeah..
Sent from my iPad GT-N7000 using xda premium
Any luck changing DPI? I could daily this fine if I could just get things to not be so jumbo. Tried 2 programs from market and both (even after new superuser install) wont keep settings.
ericshmerick said:
I'm not touching a ROM unless it's official.
Maybe I've grown up, but flashing ****ty buggy ROMs is not for me anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I flashed CM7 on my nexus one, it was far from ****ty and buggy. I'd call it official in its own way; rather refined, actually, with better performance and many more features than my previous "official" ROM. I don't know anything about CM9 yet, though.
Obviously nexus devices (most atleast) have been famed for ported ROMs does anybody think we can expect something for our nexus 7s?
U BLIND BRO? http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1677
jaroslavj said:
U BLIND BRO? http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1677
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh no how could i have missed that section....clearly the modaco custom ROM i'm running fell from the skies
1) i'm not blind, but i suggest you should read this ...especially 2.3 http://forum.xda-developers.com/announcement.php?f=1674
2) i'm not your bro
3) if you don't have anything constructive to add, don't say anything
i'm talking about when the nexus one ran that ported HTC ROM...nexus s ran that ported ROM from the galaxy s, etc etc. I know it's still early days but what's everyone else's opinions on things like that?
ace9988 said:
oh no how could i have missed that section....clearly the modaco custom ROM i'm running fell from the skies
1) i'm not blind, but i suggest you should read this ...especially 2.3 http://forum.xda-developers.com/announcement.php?f=1674
2) i'm not your bro
3) if you don't have anything constructive to add, don't say anything
i'm talking about when the nexus one ran that ported HTC ROM...nexus s ran that ported ROM from the galaxy s, etc etc. I know it's still early days but what's everyone else's opinions on things like that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If a developer is adventurous enough then yes. The nexus s also had a sense port. I wouldn't hold my breath though, now I have to go check out videos of new sense and touchwiz features.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
BrianDigital said:
If a developer is adventurous enough then yes. The nexus s also had a sense port. I wouldn't hold my breath though, now I have to go check out videos of new sense and touchwiz features.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see any point of those particular two right now because they're still on ICS while we're on jellybean so it wouldn't make sense (no pun intended). I'm not holding my breath because i'm perfectly happy with what jellybean offers (as ported ROMs would be ICS if someone tried one now)
ace9988 said:
I don't see any point of those particular two right now because they're still on ICS while we're on jellybean so it wouldn't make sense (no pun intended). I'm not holding my breath because i'm perfectly happy with what jellybean offers (as ported ROMs would be ICS if someone tried one now)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't run it either way, was just trying to make atleast one non "omgz y do that to a nexus" post
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
ace9988 said:
I don't see any point of those particular two right now because they're still on ICS while we're on jellybean so it wouldn't make sense (no pun intended). I'm not holding my breath because i'm perfectly happy with what jellybean offers (as ported ROMs would be ICS if someone tried one now)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Once CM10 is more stable we'll definitely start seeing more ROMS.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app