Related
Saw a lot of people posting about CM9 the past month, some were hoping it is official released or supported. It won't happen until awhile more for an official update. here's an unofficial build:
I just sync and built with the vivo device tree, only changes from stock CM9:
- kernel (kaijura) - without it: no panorama, updated kernel drivers, etc
- added usb
What may be fixed later or can be done:
- merge twistedumbrella's camera code to enable camera
- add rotating keys (st.matt)
Gapps: http://goo.im/gapps/gapps-ics-20120429-signed.zip
July 02 build: http://d-h.st/ywY
cm-9-20120703.zip MD5: c0a64b1b7c2f297cb13f3ca4b501319d
Disclaimer:
I don't support or manage or fix bugs.
Only compiled for people who wanted to try where CM9 is or were sad IncS doesn't have CM9.
old posts for archive purposes
Code:
This is a kang'ed version of CM9 off the repo. It is totally experimental. This lets you get an initial taste of CM9 without having to wait for however long it takes for an official release. My initial impression after running this kang: CM9 has a long way to go before it becomes daily material.
[B]Current version compiled on Feb'23 2012.[/B]
[SIZE=5][COLOR=Lime]UPDATES this version:
Minor & small bugfixes. [/COLOR][/SIZE]
[quote][U][B][SIZE=4]Currently known NOT working major stuff[/SIZE][/B][/U]
-[COLOR=red] USB / SDCARD mounting is not working[/COLOR]
-[COLOR=red] Camera / Video not working [/COLOR]
-[COLOR=red] Other random bugs?[/color]
[/quote]
[quote][U][B][SIZE=4]Downloads BELOW[/SIZE][/B][/U][/quote]
cm-9.0.0-IncS-KANG-2012-02-23.zip
[url]http://www.mediafire.com/?v7dun59slnj5p7b[/url]
Google Apps: Get first one for CM 9.0.x Android 4.0.3-4
[URL]http://goo-inside.me/gapps#table[/URL]
[quote][U][B][SIZE=4]OLDER versions BELOW[/SIZE][/B][/U][/quote]
cm-9.0.0-IncS-KANG-2012-02-18.zip (106.35MB)
[URL]http://www.mediafire.com/?iktar6672q6ya73[/URL]
cm-9.0.0-IncS-KANG-2012-02-16.zip (109.61MB)
[URL]http://www.mediafire.com/?np79fdoncacxr1x[/URL]
cm-9.0.0-IncS-KANG-2012-02-10.zip (109.62MB)
http://www.mediafire.com/?rd3lrdebhgh7bbk[/URL]
Very nice downloading now.
Sent from my anus using xda crap
kaijura said:
cout << "kaijura has no responsibility over your bricked device - DISCLAIMER";
This is a kang'ed version of CM9 off the repo. It is totally experimental. Current version compiled on Feb'10 2012.
This lets you get an initial taste of CM9 without having to wait for however long it takes for an official release. My initial impression after running this kang: CM9 has a long way to go before it becomes DD material.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot
Swyped from my incredible s using tapatalk
nice...touch of cm9 is good.
Do the new gapps for ICS which popped out in Goo-inside.me works with this ?
http://goo-inside.me/gapps#table
Ok bro. I take back what i said in the general sect
I would love to point out the bugs but im sure u already know what they are = )
Good work kajiura bro
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk
jpkbeddu said:
Do the new gapps for ICS which popped out in Goo-inside.me works with this ?
http://goo-inside.me/gapps#table
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just tried the gapps 02 07 2012 version. Yep works fine so far for gmail, market and YouTube HD.
Following CyanogenMod 9 Blog from Cyanogen himself, he said a few words on the directions of the project:
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/blog/progress-on-cm9
So it seems like from what I understand what he says, we might not get official support for camera and video until the IncS HTC ICS release, which is supposed to be wayy later this year.
kaijura said:
Following CyanogenMod 9 Blog from Cyanogen himself, he said a few words on the directions of the project:
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/blog/progress-on-cm9
So it seems like from what I understand what he says, we might not get official support for camera and video until the IncS HTC ICS release, which is supposed to be wayy later this year.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sucks major donkey butt.....
tethering work
Please, can you update the first post so the download link isn't unclickable from the xda app?
Links inside quotes are not links in the xda app... or if someone could just post the link for me
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using XDA App
*edit*
http://www.mediafire.com/?rd3lrdebhgh7bbk
So I can download it directly from my phone
who download's this stuff.. not to be rude, but it's half broken by the looks of it. there's other ICS ROMS out there with less problems.
Jess95 said:
who download's this stuff.. not to be rude, but it's half broken by the looks of it. there's other ICS ROMS out there with less problems.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is cyanogenmod team, so you get an idea of how far the cm9 team has progressed with ICS. Some people have been with CM since the old G1 days you know?
Yeah its definitely not a daily but it is pretty cool to check out. Once our phone has an official ICS ROM from htc you can bet cm9 will be official for vivo. It's more of a peek at what's to come. I swear by cm so if we don't get official support I would be amazed and disappointed.
Sent from anus using xda crap
People thought about an e-petition to opensource the camera drivers?
updated for today's build
kaijura said:
updated for today's build
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
VERY COOL! Thanks kaijura, I'll have to try this one out! Can't wait for a fully working CM9
sabret00the said:
People thought about an e-petition to opensource the camera drivers?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I email them everyday for this they even called me back to say sorry and they would try their best to release it asap
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using XDA App
TheJimFish said:
I email them everyday for this they even called me back to say sorry and they would try their best to release it asap
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People believe the target may be Qualcomm instead of HTC. There has been a long discussion on this at the DesireZ forums and lots of people emailed, you can read its progress here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=20970354
I updated the CM9 KANG build to Feb'18 2012. Lots of commits and fixes, too much to list. Some minor changes but getting more and more stable now.
In other works, I have also ported a very popular DHD ICS ROM Ice Cold Sandwich from the Desire HD section with permission from LorD ClockaN and some help from vampire36 who ported it to the Desire S.
So far, it works fine on release 2.0, it uses some sources from CM9 and community fixes.
But I need to tweak it a little to get it working smoothly, there are some minor things wrong with it and camera is not working right at the moment. If people are crazy about it I'll try to get a fully functional rom up sometime.
I haven´t found any info around the web about CM team making a vivo release? Does anybody have information about that?
weaselEST said:
I haven´t found any info around the web about CM team making a vivo release? Does anybody have information about that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The CM team tend to not discuss a lot of what they will release untill it is due soon. Guess it's to stop people nagging about deadlines.
They are probably waiting for the source code and kernel.
acme anvil said:
They are probably waiting for the source code and kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source code for HTC ROM? Or what?
weaselEST said:
Source code for HTC ROM? Or what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are waiting for the source code for kernel 3.0.16. Currently, it only works for Sense ROM's and not AOSP ROM's. AOSP for our device uses 2.6.x GB kernel hacked to work with ICS which is why our ROM's aren't fully stable yet unless your using the stock 3.0 kernel.
I emailed HTC regarding kernel sources and was told they will release it 90-120 days after the release of the WWE ICS RUU. The RUU was released a few weeks ago, so a few months to go unfortunately.
ZaySk said:
They are waiting for the source code for kernel 3.0.16. Currently, it only works for Sense ROM's and not AOSP ROM's. AOSP for our device uses 2.6.x GB kernel hacked to work with ICS which is why our ROM's aren't fully stable yet unless your using the stock 3.0 kernel.
I emailed HTC regarding kernel sources and was told they will release it 90-120 days after the release of the WWE ICS RUU. The RUU was released a few weeks ago, so a few months to go unfortunately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exacly
s*ck but we must waiting
check ice cold sandwich
4 me best ics rom
5!
Just curious, what is the difference between AOSP kernel and Sense kernel in general? If I got the source for the Sense kernel, what do I need to do to make it work for AOSP?
itandy said:
Just curious, what is the difference between AOSP kernel and Sense kernel in general? If I got the source for the Sense kernel, what do I need to do to make it work for AOSP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you have the source ;o !
and you would need to build a aosp kernal based on the sense source
naathaanb96 said:
do you have the source ;o !
and you would need to build a aosp kernal based on the sense source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just don't get so excited. It's just a big IF. ,-)
What do you meaning building an AOSP kernel based on the Sense kernel? I previously compiled some AOSP kernels from source but dunno about porting Sense kernel to AOSP.
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
itandy said:
Just don't get so excited. It's just a big IF. ,-)
What do you meaning building an AOSP kernel based on the Sense kernel? I previously compiled some AOSP kernels from source but dunno about porting Sense kernel to AOSP.
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think you need to compile a AOSP kernal from the sense kernal source. id private message kaijura or lord clokan or nik, being developers they would be able to tell you more do you know someone who is a htc dev or something ?
naathaanb96 said:
i think you need to compile a AOSP kernal from the sense kernal source. id private message kaijura or lord clokan or nik, being developers they would be able to tell you more do you know someone who is a htc dev or something ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish I do but I don't
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Now as the source code is available, we can hope for stable ICS rom.
Well ICS is already kind of stable just some minor bugs if you mean that. However JB would very likely be possible imo.
Our devs are working on it and I'm sure CM10 will be on our device Nik just got a port from DHD ROM booting and will release it tomorrow Also Floatshow and djpbx are building a JB ROM from source and I guess they're making awesome progress, too. So it's just about time, mate
Nice to see that my old thread has been awaken
Waiting from CM10 now.
Just a matter of time. Gonna be a fun few weeks
Sent from my HTC Incredible S
Nik got it booting!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda premium
Nik released his JB rom stating he uses CM10 kernel. I understand that kernel is phone specific and does that mean we well see a CM10 alpha build really soon?
weaselEST said:
Nik released his JB rom stating he uses CM10 kernel. I understand that kernel is phone specific and does that mean we well see a CM10 alpha build really soon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't surely mean that but it's possible
What about CM9. will we get it?
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
The Jelly Bean ROM's are great, but for me there's just too many bugs.
We have the ICS source now and I'd love a stable CM9 build. Unfortunately it looks like attn1 may have moved on, and all the other devs seem to be just working on JB.
Dude your not alone...count me in for that...if i knw step by step guide to at least to compile an AOSP kernel I would do it now
i ll waiting too but however stable cm9 or cm 10 doesnt exisit by now
Be patient
No I'm waiting for CM9 o CM10 too for a valid porting of MIUI
Everyone is waiting for CM9 but we need a kernel to get everything working propably! Our devs are working on it but they have a life, too. Don't expect sb to do a one-man Jesus show here;D Be patient, we will get fully working CM9 when kernel boots up
And in the future you can post stuff like this in our famous OFF-Topic-thread Keeps the G-Sec clean
Raithmir said:
The Jelly Bean ROM's are great, but for me there's just too many bugs.
We have the ICS source now and I'd love a stable CM9 build. Unfortunately it looks like attn1 may have moved on, and all the other devs seem to be just working on JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't really matter much which ROM to make - ICS based or JB based CM. Because to make a proper and stable ROM, all you need is to make a stable AOSP\AOKP compatible kernel (and we still don't have one).
PS: AFAIK CM team wont add CM9 support for any more devices, i.e. if they will make a CM for our IncS it will be JB based CM10 and not CM9.
I thought that once we had sources, the kernel would be pretty easy, but then I don't know much about it. Who is working on the kernel?
I also thought that CM would only support a phone if source was available. Since we only have ICS source right now, that would rule out CM10 wouldn't it?
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Raithmir said:
I thought that once we had sources, the kernel would be pretty easy, but then I don't know much about it. Who is working on the kernel?
I also thought that CM would only support a phone if source was available. Since we only have ICS source right now, that would rule out CM10 wouldn't it?
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many of the CM10 ROMs don't have manufacturer source for JB (only ICS) therefore it is safe to assume that our ICS kernel can be used with CM10.
If we want official support we need a maintainer
The maintainer for the 7x30 HTC devices like ours, dhd, desire s etc
Our maintainer, Kali- moved on to Sony devices iirc
If we ask nexx and nk111 (cm devs from desire s) nicely maybe they might build for us
Sent from my HTC Incredible S
I understand that attn1 is still our maintainer.
weaselEST said:
I understand that attn1 is still our maintainer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Orly? Anyone heard from him/her?
Sent from my HTC Incredible S
I sent him a tweet some time ago after he bought S3 and I wrote something like this: "So you're not the maintainer for IncS anymore". And he replied "What makes you think that" . He still owns a vivo and a vivos.
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
weaselEST said:
I sent him a tweet some time ago after he bought S3 and I wrote something like this: "So you're not the maintainer for IncS anymore". And he replied "What makes you think that" . He still owns a vivo and a vivos.
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good, hopefully he can compile CM10 soon and bring official support for CM9/10
I would be very grateful of that
I really want CM9 without any bug. Even now im usin CM7! i didt find any ICS AOSP rom. So im thinking about change my phone
Plz coock it...
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Greetings!
My friend asked me if I could speed up his incredible S, and I told him that I could try and install a new rom on it.
However, I don´t know a thing about Incredible S roms. I am looking for a stable and fast rom, he is an android noob
so it has to have little to no bugs. Also ICS or JB would be good.
I don´t know if MIUI is available for this phone, but if so, is it fast and bug free? How about AOKP or CM9/10?
Which roms would you guys recommend, I´d like to try some non-sense
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium HD app
MIUI works great on this For AOKP I would try IceCold. CM9/CM10 are still full of bugs here but if you want you can have a look at them also. I would recommend CodeNameAndroid, as it has got the coolest tweaks
I'd recommend you to give Paranoid Android a try.
Except for some kernel related stuff, there are no major issues, and yes - it is responsive. And with some undervolting I get really good battery life out of it as well, even though I overclock.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1863862
*edit*
"little to no bugs"
Well, CyanogenMod 7, MIUI or Sense-ROM's seems to be your options in that case.
Pretty much every AOSP/AOKP ROM with ICS/JB will have the same bugs since the current kernels that are used for them are hacked to work... so if he doesn't want any bugs he should stay away from ICS/JB ROM's that are AOSP/AOKP - for now at least, but if it doesn't matter that much if some stuff isn't working properly and so on: go for Paranoid Android or Codename android.
WILLI120 said:
MIUI works great on this For AOKP I would try IceCold. CM9/CM10 are still full of bugs here but if you want you can have a look at them also. I would recommend CodeNameAndroid, as it has got the coolest tweaks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about the Venom ViperVIVO?
As I remember, you and markj talked about it once or twice.
The least buggy rom I use has to be IceColdSandwich
thuanle said:
How about the Venom ViperVIVO?
As I remember, you and markj talked about it once or twice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ViperVIVO is not out for public yet, still beta's.
But from what I've heard, it seems to be worth a try when it is released
thuanle said:
How about the Venom ViperVIVO?
As I remember, you and markj talked about it once or twice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, it's a Sense ROM And it's not out for public yet but I tried it and if everything works, it's gonna be awesome as candy!
Is the MIUI rom functional and without bugs? MMS and all that shizzle working? Which version is the best, and is it 2.3 or 4.0?
Is MIUI completely bug free? Is it 2.3 or ICS that it is built on?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app
Sebz4n said:
Is MIUI completely bug free? Is it 2.3 or ICS that it is built on?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Miui gingerbread was based off CM7 so it didn't have many problems
Miui ICS is based off HTC's ICS ruu so there are not many problems either. Some problems from the chinese miui release were fixed by spongychicken. His rom is in the dev section, have a look
Codename android has my vote. It is a great JB ROM. however, it does have a few bugs.
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
vizzy said:
It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm torn between the two! On the one hand, I want a stable ROM which would be CM9, but I also love that JellyBean goodness. I've also seen some people here that simply want a stable CM9 that's up to date, and other's that want the latest CM10 despite bugs. That's the point of this thread
I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?
My vote goes towards CM9! been using codename for the past couple months and although i'm enjoying all the new features, i still find myself yearning for a rock solid & stable ASOP based build.
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
linezero said:
I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could give it a try, but if nik and others couldn't get a 3.0 kernel up and running for AOSP, then I'll have a damn hard time. I'd prefer to have someone else make the new kernel, I don't know much about compiling them. Till then, I would just use X-ICS4.0 for the kernel.
Make a CM9, CM10 would have in the end too much bugs and they would just chance again. I'm waiting for a stable cm9 anyway
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Kernel 3, Cm10 got my vote
sent from my jellybean device
ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!
Yeah. CM9 would be OK for me too. I can help with testing if needed.
But what would be those great JB features we would be missing out? Sry I haven't been following the differences between 4.0 and 4.1.
IncS community is desperate for at least one fully functional, bugless AOSP ROM, so my vote goes for CM9
CM9 bro..wishing for bugless one.. gud luck..
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
My 2 cents.
CM9. Kernel sources for ICS has been release by HTC and ANY AOSP rom that is stable would be very welcome in our community.
(I know there is gingerbread roms.. But.. Its ginger bread..)
Jelly Bean is nice and all,
But the odds of getting a stable AOSP rom are much higher with cm9.
CM9 I would say. I hope you can fix data problems for Vodafone NL users. We always have problems with data connection on AOSP ROMs.
CM9 would be great....!!
Its great to see devs are enthusiasticaly working on Roms..!!
You are the one dude...
Jst for info u might already aware of
This thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1914015
CM10 test build
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
my vote a CM9 ASOP rom and bugless
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
naathaanb96 said:
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree. I don't like much sense ROMs, CM9 with working camera and camcorder would be perfect!
Thanks ZaySk
CM9!!!!
ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My request would be neither CM9 nor CM 10.... it will be great if you can work on Kernel Version 3.... Becz that is the only roadblock for us for Jelly Bean and would open doors for may developers to come up with fresh and exciting jelly bean ROMs.....Why stay behind the world guys... lets target Jelly bean step by step.....who knows if you start working on kernel it may really turn out to be good.....Try for kernel bro......all the best.. try to compile it from source....
A rock solid cm9 would be great!
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app