Had anyone found a way to get from 1ghz to 1.2ghz with the .2233 leak? I've been searching and haven't found anything.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
Im at 1.2ghz but it did it on its own... i didnt have to do anything.
sent from my DROID BIONIC via XDA App
Yes i realize that some of the devices are 1.2ghz with no work. I've also seen where people who's cpu file says rev 2 are at 1.2ghz, whereas the rev 3 people are stuck at 1ghz.
If it helps anyone my path was to ota to .905 then flash to .2233 with a brand new refurb. I couldn't get root because i didn't have it before i flashed to .2233 (used all methods) so i went back to .902, ota'd again, then rooted with motofail and saved root with voodoo across the .2233 update.
Does anyone who used voodoo have 1.2ghz?
Fyi, I'm using elixir 2 to get my stats.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
I think the revision is the key here. I'm revision 3 and clocked at 1ghz. My brother's Bionic is a refurb with a revision 2 processor. He hasn't expressed any interest in trying a leak, so I can't confirm what speed he'll have. But if he changes his mind, I'll update you all on the results.
I dont see were you get the rev version your talking about. Olease inform me. I have the new update downloaded from verizon sing normal phone update and u
Its got both 1000 abd 1200 mhz to choose from on normal cpu governors using rom toolbox
Where the slide is on the ROM toolbox? You have a choice? Like a radio button?
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
im running at 1.2.......i bought my phone at launch....i wonder if that makes any difference
I bought my phone launch day via CostCo. I have a rev 2 CPU - I'm stuck at 1.0 GHz.
So, it's not rev specific at all.
Well, there goes that theory.
Eh, I guess I should just be happy that it otherwise works flawlessly now. The 4g/3g transfer is perfect and the battery life is great for stock.
I was talking to my brother earlier and he's been having horrible problems with his galaxy nexus. Dropping calls, having to toggle airplane mode to get data back, runs super hot. It sure made me feel better about what we have.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
Lol, for sure. I'm loving this phone on the ICS leaks, particularly the .235, even though I advise most to stay away from it.
if your clocked at 1000Mhz or 1200Mhzseems to be the luck of the draw
1.2 for me. I used voodoo to keep root as well.
Sent from my XT875 using Tapatalk 2
I thought I read somewhere that this is because some Bionics have a 4430 and some have a 4460, if you have the 4430 you get set at 1Ghz on ICS, if you have a 4460 you get set at 1.2Ghz. Maybe I imagined it.
brandogg said:
I thought I read somewhere that this is because some Bionics have a 4430 and some have a 4460, if you have the 4430 you get set at 1Ghz on ICS, if you have a 4460 you get set at 1.2Ghz. Maybe I imagined it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. All have 4430.
Furthermore, we've seen at least two different revisions, but we've also seen users who have 1.2 GHz with both revisions, and we've seen users with 1.0 GHz with both revisions of the CPU. Sol, it is not revision specific either.
I found a kpanic partition on the phone, which I dd'd to the sdcard as test.img and when I viewed the file in notepad, there were 1400 lines in there, out of which at least 15 or 20 lines were status 3 (intuitively guessing error / critical error) on a 2.6 kernel but dated 7th of July - which was the day I installed the .232 leak, IIRC.
My current supposition is that some test is performed, and if a kernel panic is issued, it keeps you at 1.0 and if not it bumps you to 1..2.
johnlgalt said:
Nope. All have 4430.
Furthermore, we've seen at least two different revisions, but we've also seen users who have 1.2 GHz with both revisions, and we've seen users with 1.0 GHz with both revisions of the CPU. Sol, it is not revision specific either.
I found a kpanic partition on the phone, which I dd'd to the sdcard as test.img and when I viewed the file in notepad, there were 1400 lines in there, out of which at least 15 or 20 lines were status 3 (intuitively guessing error / critical error) on a 2.6 kernel but dated 7th of July - which was the day I installed the .232 leak, IIRC.
My current supposition is that some test is performed, and if a kernel panic is issued, it keeps you at 1.0 and if not it bumps you to 1..2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if revision has anything to do with batches. Some batches will be able to handle 1ghz and some will be able to handle 1.2ghz. The 4430 was only tested at 1ghz and only passed on into our phones if capable of 1ghz. Possibility of anything higher than 1ghz is pretty much based on what batch it was in. I tried overclocking my phone before and it was only able to handle at most 1.25ghz with somewhat of a stability. It is possible that Motorola coded ICS to only enable it to 1.2ghz only if it could handle it. There's no point in forcing people to 1.2ghz if the phone was going to cause instability as it was only intended to run at 1ghz from the start.
Proc Rev
I have a rev3 proc running at 1.2 so I definitely don't think it is the revision of the proc.
Revision just means that there was a change in the design or structure. What was done I have no clue. Batches just refers to when it was made. Some batches may have been made with better quality material or better process etc. You could have let's say 4 machines making the same processor but depending on what material they get, who's running the material, what revision of the program they are running, etc... that would determine the quality of the workpiece. Thus some can run at higher clock speed than others while some don't. When it comes to QC'ing the processors they only test them at 1ghz for the Bionic and then 1.2ghz for the Razr. However sometimes a change in revision may result in better clock speeds if that was the aim of the revision. Wondering what revision the Razr have.
Related
Hi guys,
I'm not sure if any of you are aware, but I've developed Smartbench 2010 couple of months back for Android phones. But just like most other apps available today, version 2010 does not properly handle multiple cores. I am currently working on Smartbench 2011 which will handle multi-core processors by natively using 4 threads for CPU-related tests (hence the app is really quad-core ready).
Now given that Optimus 2X is the first dual-core phone to hit the market, I'm curious if 2011 works as expected, and also if Optimus 2X is properly configured to use the two cores.
I'd appreciate if anyone here could install and run this app and report the two scores - productivity and games. Smartbench 2011 will auto-submit all test run scores, so you will see a rapid increase in number of results you can compare against, once released to the general public.
Remember, this is a beta version (labeled v0.1) and you won't find it in the market place yet. As was the case with 2010, this one will also be available for free eventually.
Here's the link:
[Link removed]
Thanks much!
EDIT: Smartbench 2011 v0.7 has been released. It will now allow you to sort results by either Average, Productivity or Games scores. Please re-install this version.
EDIT2: Smartbench 2011 v0.8 has been released. It now offers a filtering option - you can see all results or just stock clock speed results. Mandelbrot test also has been extended for better precision. Again, please re-install this version.
EDIT3: I have just published Smartbench v1.0 in the Android Market - please install this version moving forward. Results submitted by the BETA version will no longer be stored in the server DB. Your support during the BETA period has been very helpful!
Hi-
I own the Korean version of the Optimus 2x (su660) which has been rooted. I ran the bench and submitted the scores....the games/productivity scores were around 1300/2000
Thank you, I can see them.
I can also see which apps don't behave well with multiple cores right now - I need to further optimize them. It appears that 'Pi' actually executes amost 3 times faster on 2X than it does on HTC G2! But Mandelbrot does no where near as well, which implies there are some artificial bottlenecks within my Mandelbrot code. I need to experiment further into this.
Thanks everyone who submitted the scores - they were very helpful.
Hi again,
I've made several modifications to the original code. I hope the artificial bottleneck that existed in the Mandelbrot test that caused low scores on 2X is now resolved. Also, I've completely removed the File IO tests mainly because I noticed that 2X produces especially inconsistent results. Samsung Galaxy S also had similar issues so I might as well not use it. I've also added new test which basically deals with large string data and also performs some regular expressions on them.
For those who are interested, please install and run the app. It will automatically submit the results to the server, and the result chart will automatically display them.
Thanks again!
Dl'ed the new version and ran it again. Scores similar to the Atrix scores. Not exactly sure what they mean, but hopefully it helps
cvitur1 said:
Dl'ed the new version and ran it again. Scores similar to the Atrix scores. Not exactly sure what they mean, but hopefully it helps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should be similar to Atrix since both are Tegra 2 based.
You have two scores in Smartbench - Productivity and Games Indexes. Productivity Index is more relevant for people who use any apps that do not use the GPU, while Games Index is more relevant if you are interested in GPU accelerated apps such as 3D games.
Thanks for the feedback.
Smartbench 2011 v0.7 has been released. It will now allow you to sort results by either Average, Productivity or Games scores. Please re-install this version.
Smartbench 2011 v0.8 has been released. It now offers a filtering option - you can see all results or just stock clock speed results. Mandelbrot test also has been extended for better precision. Again, please re-install this version.
My OP2X - 2981/ 2561
Non Rooted.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
EDIT3: I have just published Smartbench v1.0 in the Android Market - please install this version moving forward. Results submitted by the BETA version will no longer be stored in the server DB. Your support during the BETA period has been very helpful!
HTC Magic
I tried it on my HTC Magic to see what sort of a differance it would give on a crap phone versus a high-end one. Results were, well, horrible
Productivity: 100 something
Games: 200 something
lyberikus said:
I tried it on my HTC Magic to see what sort of a differance it would give on a crap phone versus a high-end one. Results were, well, horrible
Productivity: 100 something
Games: 200 something
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not surprised.
Just ran this on my Dell Streak 7, clocked at 1.6ghz and scored 4096 games, 2900 productivity
On my rooted o2x (su660) has 1.4ghz oc kernel and GB stock rom,
It scored 3594 productivity , 3357 games.
I get nothing but adverts PILE OF CRAP
My bench
Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The linpack mflops looks great. I get 11 on a tweaked out 2.6.29 @800mhz
The quadrant isn't amazing but I think its at least an improvement over the stock 2.6.29 kernel. I get 1800-1900 running my latest test kernel @ 800mhz on Gingerbread(quadrant typically scores less in Gingerbread than Froyo unlike other benchmarks)
Looks like 2.6.32 has some potential.
Holy crap....
This is going to be great once we get kernel source and can undervolt/overlcock this sucka
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
notinterested said:
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
dsf3g said:
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
s52m3 said:
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Masterface7 said:
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
dalingrin said:
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have found the exact opposite to be true. I go to a site that has videos not optimized for mobile and on CM7 they are simply not watchable. With the 1.2 flash its not perfect but certainly better than it is in CM7. Which is surprising because when im on CM7 i run 1100MHZ compared to the 800 with the 1.2 flash.
Anyone else have linpack scores on 1.2 they can post?
Linpack score sux
davidukfl said:
Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
LINKPACK
score is 6.056 mflops, in 13.84 seconds, normal resolution 5.68, set cpu 925 mhz max/min running cyanogen 7.0.3 will all processes closed.
QUADRANT STANDARD
score is avg roughly 900 and i'm getting anywhere from 3 to 38 fps.
i've owned n1, m.droid, evo and now dinc that all ran cyanogen and never saw such low scores. i don't know if this nook color is just a little premature or that i'm putting too much emphasis on these scores but i believe there's a 2 ghz tablet around the corner with more horsepower. what do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why did you bump this just to scatter crap?
Running CM7 and OC, I'm hitting quad scores of 2400-3000
Try messing with the NC more before you write it off.
I also agree...
If you are getting scores that low, then something is wrong, wrong, wrong.
I am operating on the CM 7.0.3 and have the thing OC'd at 1300.
I get consistent scores in the 2500 - 2900 range...
Lego
All day...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Suck it stock IncS.
3651 at that same frequency.
my loss of points was SD card because I'm using a class 2 16gb card, not the 8gb class 4 that came with it.
Different benchmarks as I took them a few weeks ago, but could be interesting for the sake of comparison anyways. The first picture was taken at stock clock speed using the Quadrant benchmark. The second was taken @ 1209MHz and the third @ 1401MHz I believe (I didn't take note so it may vary +- 100MHz). I wasn't brave enough to go any higher Although I know that the Tiamat kernel could allow you to go up to 2.0GHz which is just ridiculous. Setup shown in my signature.
ARHD 1.1.7 and Quadrant Advanced.
itsbeertimenow said:
All day...
Suck it stock IncS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering what ROM you were using on that test?
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
AnTuTu
Quadrant
More recent
this competition may lead to some bricked devices..anyways will make a good paper weight...
Sent from my inspire 4g using cm7 n259
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
itsbeertimenow said:
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I know is that guy has an Incredible S phone and today isn't national trolling day, right? So this even is actually possible, but still very hard to believe. Even though he managed to overclock it's GPU then it's more reasonable...
So here's my benchmark http://www.upload.ee/image/1850697/2011-11-29_22-45-30.png -.-
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
specifications please. thats really amazing bechmark !
highKo said:
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
highKo said:
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The uv/oc setting s are always restored to the kernel default once your phone is restarted unless you have your app set to "set on boot" which is never a good idea as bricks are made this way. And yes when you flash a new Rom it installs a new kernel and your setting s are set to the kernels default until you set up your oc app from wihtin your Rom.
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
keroro430 said:
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That bench was clocked at 1804 it tottally depends on which Rom your using and which kernel. That was cm nihtlies and I can't remember the kernel, all I remember was the title contained the words "lightning fast". I've used roms with kernels that won't let you surpass 1.1 ghz and I've used ones that let you o.c. to 2.1. Weather or not your phone locks up is a different story. It doesn't seem to matter if its sense or aosp as I've had both clocked over 1.8. Generally the phone will freeze if you have uncompatible settings and it tries to run more than 4 processes at once.
here's mine.
Cyanogenmod 7 Nightly + Lord Clockan's kernel also ICS theme really looks great.
This bench is at 1.6Ghz but normally it's set to ~1.2Ghz and get almost 3 days battery life.
Incredible S is an incredible phone!
2.55 GHz overclock for SHIELD
Please help test this - while there is definitely a measurable improvement in performance, it is kind of inconsistent with the sort of increases I'd expect this clock speed to bring. I have been testing this for a few days, and I'm not quite sure whether this is due to the hardware reporting the wrong clock speeds on the relevant PLLs, an overgressive power management/dvfs quirk, or a bottleneck somewhere. I did have to track down a kernel bug preventing higher clocks that turned out to be an issue with NVIDIA using a signed long where they should have used an unsigned long.
Flashing:
0. Make sure you are on the current OTA.
1. Unlock your bootloader.
2. Test the kernel: fastboot boot boot-roth-oc.img
3. See if it crashes while booting. If it does, don't proceed to the next step, and post a reply below. Before you flash, verify that you're running my kernel by checking for "[email protected]" either in the Kernel Version field in About SHIELD, doing a cat /proc/version (in case you didn't see it crashing), or verifying the maximum CPU speed is 2550 MHz.
4. If all goes well, flash the kernel: fastboot flash boot boot-roth-oc.img
Note: This boot.img is insecure (ro.secure=0) for easier debugging. Userspace apps shouldn't work yet, so this boots at 2550 MHz.
As always, boot/flash this at your own risk, though this kernel doesn't raise voltages much.
Download: http://setcpu.com/boot-roth-oc.img
Relevant patches: https://github.com/coolbho3k/kernel-roth
Picture:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Mike
Mine just came in the mail. Ill try this out tonight and let you know of it goes
AndroidFileHost said:
Mine just came in the mail. Ill try this out tonight and let you know of it goes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DUDE, this is CRAZY! I was getting almost 20 Thousand in Quadrant and 40 Thousand in AnTuTu. I want to see what this can do!
https://twitter.com/wwjoshdew/status/363142322529116160/photo/1
I haven't unlocked mine, but I will soon. Then I'd be more than happy to try out a custom kernel.
OH GOD. What are heat levels? This seems like a good way to melt hands off haha. Has anyone gotten access to the internal fans yet? If I attempt an overclock like this I'd want to have control over them like I do my desktop GPU.
Confirmed working here. Neat! Thanks very much.
Tried your Kernel. So far so good.
And the reason why you see such a inconsistent performance level is because nVidia has different CPU clocks for the Core usage:
1 Thread - Max Clock (1912MHz or with your Kernel)
2 Thread - Max Clock (1810 - 1912MHz)
4 Thread - Max Clock (1420 MHz)
/edit: Forcing a clock helps to prevent from downclocking. Antutu was 42xxx points. PPSSPP runs much better. Great work.
/edit 2: I think Tegra 4 can't statisfy a quadcore A15 with enough bandwidth. I have a CPU benchmark with scales up from 1400MHz to 2520MHz and giving 38% more performance. I see no throttling.
/edit3: Okay, i think you are right. It's not working. There is no scaling going up from 1912Mhz to 2550.
Is there a stock kernel image readily available?
Thanks!
Jesus, I go away from the forums for a week, come back, see overclocked Shield..... WHY????
Damn sweet though
DroidDont said:
Confirmed working here. Neat! Thanks very much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The shield is already a fast device but am still willing to test but first how is the battery life with this kernel because the battery life with stock kernel is amazing but if this kernel shortens the battery life too much then am better off with stock kernel, I will test when there is a stock kernel available just in case :good:
eman2001 said:
The shield is already a fast device but am still willing to test but first how is the battery life with this kernel because the battery life with stock kernel is amazing but if this kernel shortens the battery life too much then am better off with stock kernel, I will test when there is a stock kernel available just in case :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a stock image available; just use the factory boot.img with the above instructions to reflash to it.
coolbho3000 said:
There is a stock image available; just use the factory boot.img with the above instructions to reflash to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you found a fix for the slow performance at 2,55GHz?
2.55ghz...oh my! Galaxy s4 aint got a chance!:highfive:
I've been watching this thread for a couple days, nooo further responses? I take it everyone fried their Shields? Just waiting in anticipation for good news
Sent from my SHIELD using xda app-developers app
How about GPU overclocking?That will be interesting also.
Going to give this a go tonight, would it be possible to provide the stock kernel in case this one is not as stable as it might appear after initial stress testing?
Edit: nvm on stock kernel, just saw that you flash the stock boot.img
Update: booted the kernel and ran a series of benchmarks to stress test. All is stable, will be flashing for daily use.
sontin said:
Have you found a fix for the slow performance at 2,55GHz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure if this has been brought up but when the Shield goes to sleep clock rate drops by almost half on the factory kernel both on the CPU and the GPU.
Could this issue be due to that as well?
Unity engine games and live wallpapers seem to restore it to full speed.
I'll be glad to test this. as soon as i get my Shield, that is.
hopefully by the end of next month.
antutu scores have not noticably gone up with the kernel update. fyi
Flashed this kernel after the new build 59 update today and my wifi is broken.
Could be the update itself since I didn't check before I flashed the kernel. Just throwing out to see if others have the same issue.
I just updated like 2 hours ago, installed a few apps got root and twrp on it.
Installed antutu just to check the score and wow a score i got with encrypted on.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My score on 5.0.1 was 43k which i thought was ok but this new score with many apps installed and 10+ in recent was not bad at all.
What a snappy beast i got, much better then what i got when it was released!
thats a normal score on a nexus 6, 5.0, 5.01, 5.02, or 5.1. it hasnt changed. your score of 43000 was just a very low score to begin with.
simms22 said:
thats a normal score on a nexus 6, 5.0, 5.01, 5.02, or 5.1. it hasnt changed. your score of 43000 was just a very low score to begin with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well 43k was my score when i brought the device with 5.0 on it.
To me this is a huge step forward, also the performance of the device is much better now.
Android-Desire said:
Well 43k was my score when i brought the device with 5.0 on it.
To me this is a huge step forward, also the performance of the device is much better now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i was seeing 53000+ on 5.0, stock. your 43000 score was a very very low nexus 6 score. 53000+ is the normal score for a nexus 6, regardless of what your score was before. i bet it was so low because youre benchmarking it wrong. if your cpu is set to max cpu speed and min cpu speed, then thats the wrong way to bench. as your phone then decides what speed itll use. youre supposed to set your cpu speed for max cpu/max cpu, so it only tests your max cpu speed, so it will only give you your highest scores. otherwise, you have no idea what cpu speed its actually testing. obviously 43000 it wasnt testing your max cpu speed.
simms22 said:
i was seeing 53000+ on 5.0, stock. your 43000 score was a very very low nexus 6 score. 53000+ is the normal score for a nexus 6, regardless of what your score was before. i bet it was so low because youre benchmarking it wrong. if your cpu is set to max cpu speed and min cpu speed, then thats the wrong way to bench. as your phone then decides what speed itll use. youre supposed to set your cpu speed for max cpu/max cpu, so it only tests your max cpu speed, so it will only give you your highest scores. otherwise, you have no idea what cpu speed its actually testing. obviously 43000 it wasnt testing your max cpu speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
43k was stock without any modifications to cpu kernel or anything that should interfer with the benchmark, same as this screenie. stock settings all the way.
Why is it everytime i post something here that all people take it like this is my first time using an android phone? I have build roms before - 2.3.4 on HTC Desire - 2.3.4 on LG Optimus 2x and a cupcake 1.5 rom for a huawei and i have also build 5.0 aosp for this Nexus 6.
My experience with this device at 43k was when i was omw home with only antutu installed on phone and not even connected it to pc yet.
I think what he is saying is other people, like myself, got in the fifties with a standard stock 5. 0 device.
If it really was a per device issue then I would think I would get in the sixties on 5.1 , but I don't think that's going to happen. i. e. you going from 5 .0 to 5. 1 did not jump your stats up by 10k.
But I am glad to hear it resolved your issues.
Sent from my Nexus 6
Android-Desire said:
43k was stock without any modifications to cpu kernel or anything that should interfer with the benchmark, same as this screenie. stock settings all the way.
Why is it everytime i post something here that all people take it like this is my first time using an android phone? I have build roms before - 2.3.4 on HTC Desire - 2.3.4 on LG Optimus 2x and a cupcake 1.5 rom for a huawei and i have also build 5.0 aosp for this Nexus 6.
My experience with this device at 43k was when i was omw home with only antutu installed on phone and not even connected it to pc yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, you were doing something wrong then, whatever it was. 43000 is a nexus 5 antutu score, lol. btw, me, and everyone i know with a nexus 6 hit 53000+ on stock, while still stock. btw, just because you can build a rom, doesnt mean that you know everything android, as simple noobs can build aosp from source, and add things to it.
43k is low. I normally get around 55k.
I've had 34k before that was because the battery was low and limiting the cpu speed.
Not sure how a discussion of Nationality started in a phone benchmark thread? Either way, it is unneeded and removed. Please stop.
Back to talking about meaningless numbers now....
Simm is correct - 53k is average for stock unrooted.
I can get this on my wife's phone all day without trying.
Mine did the reverse. On 5.01 I was at 53k. On 5.1 I am at 36k.
El Daddy said:
Not sure how a discussion of Nationality started in a phone benchmark thread? Either way, it is unneeded and removed. Please stop.
Back to talking about meaningless numbers now....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cause that is how they are always.
You must be able to see it from his post, he is assuming this is my first time with technology, and talking down to me like i have lived in a cave somewhere and got this created account date by accident.
Just to add a bit of confirmation (on one side) to this thread, I never got into the 50s on my stock nexus 6 until I removed encryption from the device and switched kernels. My values were consistent with what has been posted. I'm not sure how you can run Antutu wrong on a stock, unrooted, and locked bootloader device, unless you're running it while it's charging or when the battery is dead. I did neither and was scoring in the mid 40s.
For some reason I'm getting scores of around 44,000 in stock 5.1 (rooted). Prior to flashing 5.1 I was getting around 52,000. Antutu's 3D tests aren't looking as smooth as they were before, either.
This is with stock 5.1 kernel.
Edit: OK, how silly of me. Now that I've actually tested it on a fuller battery I'm getting low 50s again.