Database Develop

what is your Quadrant results ?

my quadrant results are in the 4k while my wife's S2 is in the same range (slightly higher) both without any overclocking
I was happy with 4k but now I wonder why my wife's s2 can achieve similar numbers with no overclocking.
My GN overclocked at 1.7 with performance gov hardly go over 5k
I think I read some quadrant are in the 7k
what's yours ?

guessing here but since the cpu/chipset are the same and the note is a little slower in benchmarks, I'm gonna say its the bigger screen resolution that it has to power, more pixels to push.

Bingo.
I got around 4200. Fully stock.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

I got 5800 quadrant score overclocked at 1.7
and scored 5005 at default 1.4 Ghz of frequency
I am happy with it...

Thanks guys for the input I feel better now

ArcticCat said:
Thanks guys for the input I feel better now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well you just made me feel worse, im getting 3900

Quadrant score fluctuates a lot, so I don't know if it is reliable. I had about 5k and the next benchmark I had over 6k, so.... ofcourse, i had it set to 1.7ghz.

Usually around 4000.

1st 3800
2nd 4000
3rd 4200
4th 4600
5th 4700
6th 4600
Not sure which result is accurate even knowing that quadrant means nothing.

Quadrant is such a badly flawed benchmark, it can't even be used to compare the real world performance between two ROMs, let alone two different devices!
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

foxmeister said:
Quadrant is such a badly flawed benchmark, it can't even be used to compare the real world performance between two ROMs, let alone two different devices!
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your proof?
WE hear it all the time but nobody ever explains it.

1.4ghz Non-Overclocked, but massively tweaked and I get:
1st Score: 5900
2nd Score: 6200
3rd Score: 6200
4th Score: 6000
5th Score: 6300

xAnimal5 said:
1.4ghz Non-Overclocked, but massively tweaked and I get:
1st Score: 5900
2nd Score: 6200
3rd Score: 6200
4th Score: 6000
5th Score: 6300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow that's impressive!
What kind of tweaks are you taking about?

ArcticCat said:
wow that's impressive!
What kind of tweaks are you taking about?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Deleted pretty much everything you can to create a stable system
Adjusted the voltages based on my use
Added some build.prop tweaks
Tweaked the system UI for less RAM usage
No background widgets/No background activity
Double checked an triple checked all apps to make sure no mail process is in use
RAM Optmization tweaks
A bunch of other tweaks that I can't recall off the top of my head... haha

My Score ...
this is my score with quadrant !!

seepage said:
Your proof?
WE hear it all the time but nobody ever explains it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My personal proof is my own personal experiences, but you only need to Google terms like "quadrant benchmark flawed" to find lots of examples.
I've owned a great number of Android devices, and seen widely varying Quadrant scores, yet not one of them has ever indicated the comparative real world experience between the devices.
For example, my Galaxy Tab 7" would only score around 800 (stock) whereas my Note gets over 3600. Is the Note 4.5 times faster in real world usage - not even close! It is faster, but I would subjectively place the performance at around 1.4x to 1.5x.
In a similar vein, when I changed my Galaxy Tab 7" to use EXT4 instead of RFS, but Quadrant score shot up to nearly 2000, but was it over twice as fast as stock? No, once again not even close! However, it still felt faster in real world usage than my HTC Sensation which gets around 2500 on Quadrant.
Quadrant basically performs a lot of individual benchmarks on a device and then amalgamates the result into a single number. Those individual benchmarks may well be of use, but the ultimate number is derives clearly "weights" each benchmark inconsistently/incorrectly to be of any real use when comparing real world performance.
Ultimately, what do these numbers mean if they can't give you an idea of comparative performance?
I find it quite amusing the number of people on this site who chase high Quadrant scores. It's like comparing an M-series BMW with a regular model which has a M-series bodykit and then saying how they perform based purely on looks.
Regards,
Dave

Phandroid (or AndroidCentral) had an article about the crapyness of Quadrant some time ago.
And actually, a lot of mobile review sites refuses to run Quadrant anymore.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

[Q] 3D and 2D performance

Hi N7 fellow users
i get MAX 2600 3D and 350 2D in antutu and quadrant though i'm all the time OC the GPU to 520mhz
is that normal ?? i'm running the latest Paranoid Android rom along the latest Franco kernel.

That is about what I get for 3D. If you go to the developer menu you can improve your 2D performance by checking the "Force GPU rendering" . For what it's worth my 2D for Quadrant went to about 1000 after the checking that option.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

Thanks for your reply
My htc one X was getting 39xx, 1k higher than my nexus
though they use nearly the same gpu.

Homurato said:
Thanks for your reply.
My htc one X was getting 39xx, 1k higher than my nexus
though they use nearly the same gpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant does not measure gpu, it measures fps. and we are limited to 59fps no matter how much we overclock the gpu. use a benchmark like windmill, or basemark taiji, to test your gpu and what tweaking your gpu does. quadrant is an old, out of date benchmark.

simms22 said:
quadrant does not measure gpu, it measures fps. and we are limited to 59fps no matter how much we overclock the gpu. use a benchmark like windmill, or basemark taiji, to test your gpu and what tweaking your gpu does. quadrant is an old, out of date benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i guess i have to forget about all this paranoia coming from the low benchmark scores since every game works xD
(except horn strangely runs about 25 fps it seems, even though i'm oced to 520mhz)

Low of diminishing returns, if you over clock it doesn't mean ull always get higher scores, after ur GPU gets heated up it start to show lower and lower scores.
GPU is stable @ 446 (beyond that when ever it gets heated up it will cause touch and other issues)
Source: Read kernel Developers OP once a while

Nexus 4 Benchmarks

I ran a bunch of benchmarks on my LG Nexus 4 16GB.
Antutu 24884
Quadrant 6494
Basemark OS II 558
Basemark X 11127
Passmark (System 2292, CPU 13517, 3D 695)
3DMark IceStorm Unlimited 11330
Vellamo (Multi-Core 1204, Browser 2188)
Geekbench 3 (Single 505, Multi 1654)
GPU Benchmark 3D 12523

Please use the existing benchmark thread
Nexus 4 Benchmarks thread
Closed

Antutu Benchmark

Although I rarely use said app, I do like to run 1 test on each device I get (then forget about it).
This is a very fine result......I'm impressed.......:good:

Translation?

Duncan1982 said:
Although I rarely use said app, I do like to run 1 test on each device I get (then forget about it).
This is a very fine result......I'm impressed.......:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume you are rooted because of the status bar icons.
What all are you running on yours?
I currently run NoLimits/RENOVATE ICE/ElementalX/FDE.AI and this is my current score.
Pretty much all settings within those are stock with the exception being the I/O Scheduler and TCP Algorithm.

Wondering how you achieved that score, with some tweaking I got 385k

_Hinnie_ said:
Wondering how you achieved that score, with some tweaking I got 385k
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I achieved this score due to a German Kernel developer........Which will be released in due course, or if you want to try it now, look and you will find... .

Duncan1982 said:
I achieved this score due to a German Kernel developer........Which will be released in due course, or if you want to try it now, look and you will find... .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really appreciate you kindness to give your source.

Google says atutu is a benchmark how your phone handles 2d and 3d. This is something I'm willing to root for if knew the rom and kernal used, and if there was way to get the Ota updates with this speed. Everything is peiced here and there on how to

New record with smurf kernel:

Duncan1982 said:
Although I rarely use said app, I do like to run 1 test on each device I get (then forget about it).
This is a very fine result......I'm impressed.......:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Toni Moon said:
New record with smurf kernel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Care to share your smurf config? The best I've gotten is 406k (still great IMO)
Sent from my OnePlus7Pro using XDA Labs

terlynn4 said:
Care to share your smurf config? The best I've gotten is 406k (still great IMO)
Sent from my OnePlus7Pro using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already share it in smurf kernel telegram

Can someone msg me on Telegram 'Ladiesman217' in regards to their setup? regards.

Out of the box AnTuTu benchmark score

Zephyr! said:
Out of the box AnTuTu benchmark score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With Antutu beta like you:

AnTuTu + Geekbench 4 benchmarks for update Oxygen OS 9.5.13.21AA
BEST PERFORMANCE UPDATE!! Highest score yet on AnTuTu and a small increase in Multi-Core for Geekbench 4 on this newest update 9.5.13.
9.5.13 - Full Zip - http://www.mediafire.com/file/x05vrhczu0kic2d/9.5.13.GM21AA.zip/file
09/07/2019 - 9.5.13.21AA
AnTuTu: 376,505 (+5,852)
https://imgrpost.com/image/hk6AH
Geekbench 4:
Single-Core 3496 (-12)
Multi-Core 11233 (+121)
https://imgrpost.com/image/hkOKC
07/31/2019 - 9.5.11.21AA
AnTuTu: 370,653 (+5,155)
https://imgrpost.com/image/hk5j8
Geekbench 4:
Single-Core 3508 (+56)
Multi-Core 11,112 (+330)
https://imgrpost.com/image/hkCVU
07/17/2019 - 9.5.10.21AA
AnTuTu: 365,498 (-7,755)
https://imgrpost.com/image/eYVi3
Geekbench 4:
Single-Core 3452 (-45)
Multi-Core 10,782 (-238)
https://imgrpost.com/image/eYXdB
07/08/2019 - 9.5.9.21AA
AnTuTu: 373,253 (-157)
https://imgrpost.com/image/XBQ4o
Geekbench 4:
Single-Core 3497 (-8)
Multi-Core 11,020 (-43)
https://imgrpost.com/image/XBnxg
06/06/2019 - 9.5.7.GM21AA (Didn't test 9.5.8 as it came out days after 9.5.7 and I forgot)
AnTuTu: 373,410 (+1,456)
https://i.vgy.me/c3DtYD.jpg
Geekbench 4:
Single-Core 3505 (+9)
Multi-Core 11,063 (+58)
https://i.vgy.me/i2JLgx.jpg
05/22/2019 - 9.5.4
AnTuTu: 371,954
https://i.vgy.me/GQCjWh.jpg
Geekbench 4:
Single-Core 3494
Multi-Core 11,005
https://i.vgy.me/zfGWWA.jpg
- Tested on OnePlus 7 Pro (Nebula Blue, 12GB, GM1917 Global Model on the T-Mobile network), running each benchmark 3 times and taking the highest score on QHD+, FORCED 90hz, Airplane/DND/FNATIC mode and Warp Charger plugged in.
- Benchmarks on "Auto" 90hz and 60hz resulted in lower scores on average than 'forced' 90hz. - confirmed 07/08/2019

Toni Moon said:
With Antutu beta like you:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something is wrong there

bickfordman said:
Something is wrong there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's wrong? It's extremely fast because he spends time preparing the device for the benchmark and overclocks it

So did i

That's my highest

bickfordman said:
That's my highest
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that's AnTuTu v7, not V8 with the new score weighting system

Rooted running EX with a few memory/cpu tweaks

Question Antutu benchmark scored 730645!!!

I just instaled antutu out of bored and my device scored 730645 which I havent seen any device of the reviewers to score above 701something.
I do have 12GB RAM so is it because of that?
(Just checked on the antutu official rankings and my device sits first and second place is 707306, how is this possible?)

Asnamus said:
I just instaled antutu out of bored and my device scored 730645 which I havent seen any device of the reviewers to score above 701something.
I do have 12GB RAM so is it because of that?
(Just checked on the antutu official rankings and my device sits first and second place is 707306, how is this possible?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Leaderboard is based on the average score