Related
Hello,
So.. Yeah! MIUI is now open-source. The TeamCooper already has an Alpha released on their FB page. All the news about MIUI opensource : http://androidcommunity.com/chinese-oem-xiaomi-publishes-miui-open-source-code-20120203/ .
Have a nice day!
Now only if some dev starts working on a port for mini
I like MIUI's simplicity. If we get a port I won't be upgrading my phone anytime soon lol!
Nice news Hope someone will make a MIUI for Galaxy Mini
this is good news. hope other developers will make one for our MINI.
too much for cm7 hahahahaha MUI FTW!!!!!!!!
I can't wait.......><
Netas3k said:
Hello,
So.. Yeah! MIUI is now open-source. The TeamCooper already has an Alpha released on their FB page. All the news about MIUI opensource : http://androidcommunity.com/chinese-oem-xiaomi-publishes-miui-open-source-code-20120203/ .
Have a nice day!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well really sorry to say but netas3k you only tell stuff and commit but never do something yourself.
I know it cruel to say but it's truth.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
nishanty13 said:
Well really sorry to say but netas3k you only tell stuff and commit but never do something yourself.
I know it cruel to say but it's truth.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, he said true . Sorry, but this is really true :/.
Sent from my piece of **** using Tapatalk.
Wow... How supportive you guys are.... Still this is fun no matter what you say.... I still research myself. And so you know probably in two days i'm gonna release a guide how to run debian + lxde on our mini without losing android . And btw - most of the guys release just news too.... But you don't say anything to them... Either way what you said got on my mind and i will keep that. But it won't change something major in me
So will be avaible a MIUI rom for our device ?
first of all wrong section
second: developers already know that
3.when squadzone finishes cm9 he will probebly make miui v4 (my opinion cause his awesome xD)
I don't think it's a wrong sections. Since it development related news....
Sent from my GT-S5570 using Tapatalk
Good news guys samsung galaxy ace have finaly port miui 4.0
here u can see!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1504805
gmp009 said:
Good news guys samsung galaxy ace have finaly port miui 4.0
here u can see!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1504805
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ace has armv7
denzel09 said:
ace has armv7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ace have armv6 rev11...
Plus ace is mdpi
Someone correct me,
as said here (in 2nd post) :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1478558&highlight=miui
They just tell u how to port it and it's not the complete source code.
They threw in the source for a few apps...that's all.
Because MIUI is based on CM, we just take CM9, integrate MIUI source (apps, framework) in CM9 source and compile.
mv_style said:
first of all wrong section
second: developers already know that
3.when squadzone finishes cm9 he will probebly make miui v4 (my opinion cause his awesome xD)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better ask him before posting ****.
wow cool
hope it comes fast to our mini
TheWhisp said:
Because MIUI is based on CM, we just take CM9, integrate MIUI source (apps, framework) in CM9 source and compile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct.
Miui guys just took CM and modified it and kept it as closed source for quite a time.
But I think first we needa have stable CM9.
Hello everybody. I want to ask our developers, will we get Android 4.1? If not - why, if yes - when? Thanks for answers .
I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too
vishal007 said:
I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Best Regards
It is hard to get a stable ics as of now it is goin to take minimum 6 to 7 seven months before a bugfree ics and then only we can look forward to jb we muat have patience.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
Well, when the sources are out, we'll see about that
Patience is a virtue moreover there isn't much difference in user looks
Just a few add ons here and there moreover I doubt about how will this device go on with jb.But anyways well see that expect stable jb for our device by early 2013.Many experimental build will start popping out soon
vishal007 said:
I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GOOD NEWS !
MACLAW SUCCESS MAKE AOSP WORKING FOR ARM V6 !!!!! :victory:
kagamineryuki said:
GOOD NEWS !
MACLAW SUCCESS MAKE AOSP WORKING FOR ARM V6 !!!!! :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
congrats
but its only for gio till now may be ace too but maclaw didnt tell any news for mini/fit aosp
they r saying they dont hav device to work on :crying:
vishal007 said:
congrats
but its only for gio till now may be ace too but maclaw didnt tell any news for mini/fit aosp
they r saying they dont hav device to work on :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
owww, that's why maclaw search for volunteer who have galaxy mini
btw thanks for information
sorry for my bad english
there won't be fully working ics/jb because no one willing to re-write damn codecs... y'all have fully working cm7, be happy with that, or buy yourself nexus s or one x, which have ics from the start. Peoples! Stop dreaming and expecting wonders from heavily outdated phone!
Maybe the devs will do something, if the rest of the people is willing to wait!
AOKP build with modified libstagefrighthw.so can play 720p @ ~10 (maybe more) fps, HQ youtube works ( as testers reported ). If AntiBillOS will give permissions camera will be working with 3rd party apps too. So... it's not so impossible after all.
Ok, so camera will work, but only ON HACKS. That's great, really. How about stability of os? :>
no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw
ajay8055 said:
no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, cm10 will be android 5.0... jellybean will be cm9.1 or something like that, since jellybean is just an update of ics...
yackovsky said:
no, cm10 will be android 5.0... jellybean will be cm9.1 or something like that, since jellybean is just an update of ics...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
might be if we get a stable ics we can get jelly bean to work..but we need something out of the ordinary
ajay8055 said:
no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From latest Marcin comments, GalaxyICS will drop Mini / Fit support.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
yackovsky said:
there won't be fully working ics/jb because no one willing to re-write damn codecs... y'all have fully working cm7, be happy with that, or buy yourself nexus s or one x, which have ics from the start. Peoples! Stop dreaming and expecting wonders from heavily outdated phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup, i agree with u. The only issue with cm9 (for me at least) is the lack of RAM, i dont care abt the "crappy camera" or "useless" FM.
all devices haing cm9 or aosp ics can run jellybean
goutamniwas said:
all devices haing cm9 or aosp ics can run jellybean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, but the question is not if they can, because it's obvious that galaxy mini is able to run ics/jb, the question is: can it be runned smoothly on low end phone? and i'm only guessing that the answer is no, because of extremely low specs (compared to other phones nowaday) of galaxy mini
Guys port the cyanogen mod 9 Galaxy Y.
Here's a link to a topic.
The original rom is REALLY BUGGY itself...How do you suppose a port will do anything good? A port will add even more bugs to the build.So much that it would become unusable.Not trying to discourage you or anything. Just stating ...
Insert witty sentence here
it would be safer it we tried to port CM9 ourself
shadowsiul said:
it would be safer it we tried to port CM9 ourself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont hink it wil b possible as cm7 is still miles away frm gettin onto our fones. GPU sources r also nt yet out(fu***** brodcom).
Theres a mini cm9 for the international gt s5830. And works really good. Almost no bugs as i installed it on my gf's ace
Maybe that one would be the right one to port.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
sebarg said:
Theres a mini cm9 for the international gt s5830. And works really good. Almost no bugs as i installed it on my gf's ace
Maybe that one would be the right one to port.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
5830 hv different board. Even GPU.
sebarg said:
Theres a mini cm9 for the international gt s5830. And works really good. Almost no bugs as i installed it on my gf's ace
Maybe that one would be the right one to port.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S5830I = Galaxy Young, but looks like Galaxy Ace S5830
S5830 =/= S5830I except for the look
at least it starts? what would need to change it to at least boot? I do not care problems, she boot is a start.
yoto111 said:
at least it starts? what would need to change it to at least boot? I do not care problems, she boot is a start.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't understand most of what devs do. I do understand some pieces of code, I know how to do some basic theming, and I can use search engines.
I also know that "she boot" is not a start. Why? Read post#2. It's written by a dev who actually knows more than your "at least it starts?" questions. We already have a CM7.2 that "she boot", but it's very buggy, and not for daily use. If you want it, and "do not care problems, she boot is a start", google it.
EDIT: Oh, forgot to mention why the "she boot" CM7.2 is full of bugs. It's ported from the Galaxy Y as well and even tho "at least it starts" the most crucial features don't work.
GermainZ said:
I don't understand most of what devs do. I do understand some pieces of code, I know how to do some basic theming, and I can use search engines.
I also know that "she boot" is not a start. Why? Read post#2. It's written by a dev who actually knows more than your "at least it starts?" questions. We already have a CM7.2 that "she boot", but it's very buggy, and not for daily use. If you want it, and "do not care problems, she boot is a start", google it.
EDIT: Oh, forgot to mention why the "she boot" CM7.2 is full of bugs. It's ported from the Galaxy Y as well and even tho "at least it starts" the most crucial features don't work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh I understand this is not exactly "a beginning" significant, but for me it is. I asked this question because I have not had time to test, but if any of you tested could say, so I asked the question. If at least boot, it means a lot to me, I'm already anxious for ace ics running on and can not wait for that to happen.
I understand little about ports, I read a lot but never tried that already do not use linux and do not have time for this, but sorry if you enterpretou bad what i said, it was not the intention.
yoto111 said:
oh I understand this is not exactly "a beginning" significant, but for me it is. I asked this question because I have not had time to test, but if any of you tested could say, so I asked the question. If at least boot, it means a lot to me, I'm already anxious for ace ics running on and can not wait for that to happen.
I understand little about ports, I read a lot but never tried that already do not use linux and do not have time for this, but sorry if you enterpretou bad what i said, it was not the intention.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM7.2 exists and is bootable on the S5830I. Try it if you want. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1770498
GermainZ said:
CM7.2 exists and is bootable on the S5830I. Try it if you want. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1770498
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so the cm7.2 came to our phone I installed it. I already know all the bugs, and also follow the topic seeing all fixes. But what i really hope is CM9, at least a version of it bootable.
yoto111 said:
so the cm7.2 came to our phone I installed it. I already know all the bugs, and also follow the topic seeing all fixes. But what i really hope is CM9, at least a version of it bootable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ROM in the OP will brick the S5830I if installed, so no one can test it unless it's ported, which is useless because:
1- It will even more buggy
2- CM9, even if ported correctly, will be extremely laggy, because the full GPU sources for the S5830I aren't available.
3- CM7 isn't ready yet. CM9 only requires more work.
Dude this is lyk imposible yet v dont have cm7,cm9 is far to go
N other thing is that this cm9 from wich ur portnng is itself bugly its useless to port a rom with bugs !!
rajrocks said:
Dude this is lyk imposible yet v dont have cm7,cm9 is far to go
N other thing is that this cm9 from wich ur portnng is itself bugly its useless to port a rom with bugs !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that true but in theory could we use MaclawStudios/icsgalaxy source to build? i know that i am asking stupid question but i mean there are alot of these question out there.
shadowsiul said:
that true but in theory could we use MaclawStudios/icsgalaxy source to build? i know that i am asking stupid question but i mean there are alot of these question out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ever read about the differances between S5830 and S5830i ? well Original device have Adreno200 which it has source code released and S5830i have Videocore IV that is made by broadcom even tho broadcom agreed to share some of its device's source code they denied to release VC IV's code without HW Acceleration its an piece of crap with 1ghz(with rafael's latest kernel) cpu and 300mb ram even Galaxy Y is better than this device because there are some ports that already getting done its cheaper if we compare this device to that...
GermainZ said:
The ROM in the OP will brick the S5830I if installed, so no one can test it unless it's ported, which is useless because:
1- It will even more buggy
2- CM9, even if ported correctly, will be extremely laggy, because the full GPU sources for the S5830I aren't available.
3- CM7 isn't ready yet. CM9 only requires more work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have installed it with ClockworkMod Recovery V5.0.2.6 and it works fine, however, after booting it is stuck at "Updating Android - Starting apps".
But, IT WORKS !!!!!!
RubenStauttener said:
I have installed it with ClockworkMod Recovery V5.0.2.6 and it works fine, however, after booting it is stuck at "Updating Android - Starting apps".
But, IT WORKS !!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You installed an unported Galaxy Y ROM on your phone and it worked? That's dumb. And I'm surprised it booted.
GermainZ said:
You installed an unported Galaxy Y ROM on your phone and it worked? That's dumb. And I'm surprised it booted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, me too, but actually it doesn't works, I only get/it's now stuck at an orange circle, witch can be moved with your finger like a laptop touchpad (after booting (without/no boot animation)).
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
RubenStauttener said:
Yeah, me too, but actually it doesn't works, I only get/it's now stuck at an orange circle, witch can be moved with your finger like a laptop touchpad (after booting (without/no boot animation)).
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool. Have fun with your new "Move the orange circle!" game
By the way, you seriously shouldn't flash Galaxy Y ROMs. Your keys may end up not getting recognized (in other words: no recovery/download mode for you anymore).
http://madteam.co/forum/general-77/(dev's)(broadcom)-open-dialogue-with-broadcom/
possible source for the gpu in the near future?
Possible cm7 in future
Open source will be never released,maybe new drivers
Well since broadcom is looking into the rom of the Y or Ace (not sure which one, because the topic was about ace, but was posted in Y Section) It is probably going to have full CPU and GPU Drivers
Qnrx said:
Well since broadcom is looking into the rom of the Y or Ace (not sure which one, because the topic was about ace, but was posted in Y Section) It is probably going to have full CPU and GPU Drivers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well let's hope so, so we can get CM7.2 on this baby? Also the broadcom guy just posted a new reply to that topic.
Any developers from here care to go over and offer what info they can to help speed this along or whatnot? He asks about the "Y" in his latest reply, if the sources are released will the devs be able to use them for CM7.2 for our S5380i?
Hi paradoxiumwind
you have to read a little more of Galaxy Ace "S5830" S5830 Young Galaxy and have the same CPU, same GPU, videocam IV .. totally the same drivers, the only thing that has more Galaxy Ace S5830 is a flash and other veicina screen 320 x 480 pixels, 3.5 inches ... I use Ace S5830 And talking with Broadcom to release some of the drivers that are essential, Broadcom seeks solutions to dismiss some of the drier gpu, to Mogo to create CyanogenMod, AOKP, AOSP ... and I understand for a lot more applications ... A full drivers for the GPU will come out a little later...
My nick on this forum is: AmirChe
Harley--TSI said:
Hi paradoxiumwind
you have to read a little more of Galaxy Ace "S5830" S5830 Young Galaxy and have the same CPU, same GPU, videocam IV .. totally the same drivers, the only thing that has more Galaxy Ace S5830 is a flash and other veicina screen 320 x 480 pixels, 3.5 inches ... I use Ace S5830 And talking with Broadcom to release some of the drivers that are essential, Broadcom seeks solutions to dismiss some of the drier gpu, to Mogo to create CyanogenMod, AOKP, AOSP ... and I understand for a lot more applications ... A full drivers for the GPU will come out a little later...
My nick on this forum is: AmirChe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the explaination, so since they're basically the same hardware when they release the source for the "Y", we (I mean the devs) can use it for our i to get CM7.2?
paradoxiumwind said:
Thanks for the explaination, so since they're basically the same hardware when they release the source for the "Y", we (I mean the devs) can use it for our i to get CM7.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
Yes, I think they will only need to be replaced LCS Density from 120 to 160. or in the extreme case, to update and to add some more oddatak .. The whole system is done everything works great, but we can not be installing, means You can not get to the entrance, squardzone tested and missing his only got one driver ... look at the dialogue I think there you have everything else you need
will we able to see ICS or JB?
now a question... I know, is too soon, but, will we be able to see Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean in our loved devices? I'd like to help...
gabboman said:
now a question... I know, is too soon, but, will we be able to see Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean in our loved devices? I'd like to help...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, but they will run like ass? Our phones are not powerful. I will be happy with CM7.2
paradoxiumwind said:
Sure, but they will run like ass? Our phones are not powerful. I will be happy with CM7.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
domnic79 said:
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And on paper our Gpu is powerful..If it works well then cm7 should be the first step.
Sent from my GALAXY ACE on Ace cream v1.2
domnic79 said:
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
andy.acei said:
And on paper our Gpu is powerful..If it works well then cm7 should be the first step.
Sent from my GALAXY ACE on Ace cream v1.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM9 & CM10 Work Perfectly on galaxy GIO too. And apart from a greater PPI value, galaxy gio is lesser in sepcs as compared to Ace-i. I also think (And Hope) CM9 & 10 should work like a charm on 5830i as well in the near future. :good:
saeed14i said:
CM9 & CM10 Work Perfectly on galaxy GIO too. And apart from a greater PPI value, galaxy gio is lesser in sepcs as compared to Ace-i. I also think (And Hope) CM9 & 10 should work like a charm on 5830i as well in the near future. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Specs do not matter much to run CM9/10. But you need good specs to run it smoothly. Even HTC G1, the first android phone, has Jelly bean but it lags.
Availability of drivers for chipset matters the most.
system.img said:
Specs do not matter much to run CM9/10. But you need good specs to run it smoothly. Even HTC G1, the first android phone, has Jelly bean but it lags.
Availability of drivers for chipset matters the most.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You right mate, we should move like Galaxy Y users, but here is everybody ""waiting"" for a miracle, but if all of we don't do nothing the miracle will not happens...
For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF
paradoxiumwind said:
For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is old news.
It just means that they wont officially support snapdragon s1.
paradoxiumwind said:
For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It means cyanogen wont provide a official CM9 for our device. But developers here can make a port or tweak it to run in our device once all sources regarding the CPU/GPU/kernel are available. :beer:
Sent from my GT-S5830i using Tapatalk 2
schakusa said:
You right mate, we should move like Galaxy Y users, but here is everybody ""waiting"" for a miracle, but if all of we don't do nothing the miracle will not happens...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But i think if Galaxy Y can have the sources, we can get too, because we have the same hardware and bla bla bla.
InnerSanctum said:
But i think if Galaxy Y can have the sources, we can get too, because we have the same hardware and bla bla bla.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He think he meant that we should also support them as much as we can....so that broadcom really feels that there is an urgent need for the sources.
Sent from my GT-S5830i using Tapatalk 2
CyAnO Plus Project
---Only on XDA---
Read before drawing conclusions!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you read that right! With the project cyano plus we will try to port the cyanogen mod 10 on our device (GT-S5570I).
As you may know many devices have hardware libraries updated to support the cyanogen mod, many, but our...... we have always said: Why the Galaxy Mini because galaxy mini has the cyanogen mod and we don't? Why the galaxy mini has a different chipset from our although the indirect predecessor of our device?
So, why port bring a cyanogen mod on our device? Impossible?? So why not create a rom that has the same motto of cyanogen mod: to be an alternative to the stock rom! For now, the project is limited to a stock-based rom: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2171934
but with your help we can go a long way....
So..
If you want to collaborate to make yourself available answer to the post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GOODLUCK!
I don't want hurt your heart & fingers.
But...
Wrong thread. Read XDA Rules, development thread is for RELEASED works, not discussion and any other type of that.
really looking forward to it! wish you luck in this project!
In fact need not porting. In fact need to build CM-10* for you device from source.
I build 4.2.2 for galaxy mini but this device have different board.
lol we even not hv a complete CM7
kissingmylove said:
lol we even not hv a complete CM7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In fact, the project is to run the various CM
Jeeko said:
In fact, the project is to run the various CM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u use stock,it just look like theming
The only way to get aosp is build fr source
I was using madteam CM7 but it has to much bugs. I hope that this project will be a success.
bogdan99999 said:
I was using madteam CM7 but it has to much bugs. I hope that this project will be a success.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope it too but without official driver from broadcom, it wont success
Galaxy Pop Plus'ımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi.
I would like to send them a mail to, but I don't exactly know how to formulate it. I mean, I can't send them e email like this " RELEASE THE DRIVER OR I WILL KILL YOU", I need to think to a "template".
bogdan99999 said:
I would like to send them a mail to, but I don't exactly know how to formulate it. I mean, I can't send them e email like this " RELEASE THE DRIVER OR I WILL KILL YOU", I need to think to a "template".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Given the situation would be right.But unfortunately you have to try to be as friendly as possible! :silly:
Jeeko said:
Given the situation would be right.But unfortunately you have to try to be as friendly as possible! :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And the email adress is ... .?
bogdan99999 said:
And the email adress is ... .?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2210580
Q:
If you use the driver from galaxy Y and a rom that has almost no bugs will work ?
Till now no stable cm7
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app