Sorry guys, my google-fu and xda-search-fu is turning up nothing. I'm looking for a proper Cyanogenmod 7.2 release for the verizon cdma tab. Does that exist? I'm mostly seeing modded stock GB builds.
Also, as a side question, why do the galaxy tabs have a proper cm9/10 release when the 3.0.x kernel hasn't been released from samsung? Just wondering, because it seems like there are phones that don't have a proper cm9/10 release when they have pretty solid builds working off the 2.6.x kernel too.
Thanks!
I don't think it is any CM7.
Any reason for looking CM7 only?
There is a good CM9 (stable 9.1) and nightlies CM10 if you look here: http://get.cm/?device=p1c
I hope it helps.
Brgds
I ran a CM10 nightly, and it seemed to be pretty unstable. Data would come and go, and the interface was slow a lot of the time. I currently have the 9.1 CM9 on it. Much better, but I thought I might try a proper CM7 build if there existed one to see if how smooth and stable it was.
ypsmav said:
I don't think it is any CM7.
Any reason for looking CM7 only?
There is a good CM9 (stable 9.1) and nightlies CM10 if you look here: http://get.cm/?device=p1c
I hope it helps.
Brgds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Related
Hi all,
I would like to find a proper CM9 Kang, meaning a build that is as close as possible to the CM9 source, with no or very little additions.
Does such a thing still exist?
Owain's build, excellent though it might be, is no longer a kang. Too many extra's...
Temasek isn't kanging for CM9, unfortunately.
Any propositions?
tia,
Tommmii.
How about the original CM9?
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/18090-cyanogenmod9-for-o2x-and-g2x-selfkang3/
not a bad idea, but there are many many improvements submitted to the git since selfkang3 rendering it definitely outdated.
Tommmii said:
Owain's build, excellent though it might be, is no longer a kang. Too many extra's...
Temasek isn't kanging for CM9, unfortunately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not so many "extras" that it would be "overkill". So where is the problem?
I guess you could use a KANG from Owain, before he added so many things and changed to an Unofficial build intead, try looking at build 30-35 perhaps?
I´m not familiar with any other kang´s other than the original kang´s.
But, Owain´s Builds aren´t that much different from the original CM9, I would give it a try.
Thanks Myller!
I´m now running owain´s latest build, and there´s not much difference (well there are, stability wise from the selfkang3).
donkeyaner said:
Not so many "extras" that it would be "overkill". So where is the problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll quote the dev, Owain94, himself :
also i think i should change the name this is not really a cm9 kang anymore...
still based in the big parts on cm9 but changed way to much
Anyway, there'll be an official ICS from LG soon, followed by official CM9 nightlies.
Tommmii said:
I'll quote the dev, Owain94, himself :
also i think i should change the name this is not really a cm9 kang anymore...
still based in the big parts on cm9 but changed way to much
Anyway, there'll be an official ICS from LG soon, followed by official CM9 nightlies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately I don't see an ICS release from LG coming any time soon... Yes, they told that it would happen in Q2 this year, but they seem to dodge any question from costumers regarding that question.
I sincerely believe that we won't see any release from LG before Q3 2012...
You can use euroskank builds too, there are only some cherry picks
http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/skankwich/?id=p990
jgoliveira said:
I sincerely believe that we won't see any release from LG before Q3 2012...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but...I believe in Santa Claus, fairies, unicorns, LG software updates and mermaids.
which rom is the most stable and has the fewer bugs for the touchpad?
mltk96 said:
which rom is the most stable and has the fewer bugs for the touchpad?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've had great luck with the official CM9 nightlies, I would at least just start there.
I had issues with aokp and most of the other builds for that matter. I've been on cm9 nightlies and everything is good with the world again.
Another vote for CM9 nighties.
I love AOKP on my phone, but it just is not stable enough on the touchpad yet. In time I think it will end up being the best touchpad rom, but right now it is CM9.
Hi All
Now Cyanogen Team said they will stop working on CM9 and they release Stable version but when I went to check the Nightly ROM I found they still working on it.
Stable mean no bugs and Nightly under upgrading to become stable.
Why they release stable ROM.
Who will explain this?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
mgra99 said:
Why they release stable ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as i understand... When the Nightlies become better and better the developers start a feature freeze. This means no new functions or crazy experiments - just bughunting! This is made in the RC (Release Candidate) builds. If everyone is satisfied with the RC builds, it is getting stable status.
The work on new nightlies is parallel to this process, i think!
mgra99 said:
Who will explain this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Explain what? Explain the new nightlies?
No developer would throw ICS out of the window, just because JB hit the market. Look, there are still cm7-nightlies on cyanogen build machines!
Rush
You should keep in mind that some newer version might not work well even when the development has finished due to hardware limitations.So people might want to have the maximum working version on their devices. Hipothetically if Jelly bean won't work well on our devices, then atleast we'll have a bug free ICS rom.
Hi all,
what is the difference (in performance, stability, usability, features) between CM9 and CM10? What are the drawbacks and negatives? Is it worth upgrading? I
I am currently on a CM9 stable which I find very stable and functional.
Any help appreciated. Thanks
nameh said:
Hi all,
what is the difference (in performance, stability, usability, features) between CM9 and CM10? What are the drawbacks and negatives? Is it worth upgrading? I
I am currently on a CM9 stable which I find very stable and functional.
Any help appreciated. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would think its definitely worth it. CM9 is outdated, first of all, and second, CM10 is Jellybean, meaning it has project butter improvements that CM9 (ICS) does not. You can feel a big difference in speed, both browser and around the ROM when you upgrade. I definitely recommend trying Slimbean or CM10. CM10 is just as stable as CM9, IMO. CM9 also doesnt have GNow, unlike CM10. (You could probably get Gnow for ICS too, but it just wont be as good as Jellybean's Google Now) Good Luck, hope you upgrade! Battery life is pretty good for me too.
PS I know it shows on my signature that I have a Vibrant and not an i9000, but that doesn't change the fact that CM10 is obviously faster than CM9. If I were you, I would make a Nandroid of CM9 and flash CM10 to try it out. Most people are already on it and absolutely love it.
Hello,
So, I had the same dilemma as you having now... until about a month ago i had the CM9 and then i switched to the CM 10, i used the CM 9 for about two months and the CM9 stable from when it got out to the air.
in my opinion CM10 have a lot faster browser, a lot of little nice tweaks and little changes that are great (e.g. fast redialing, retexting etc.) About the overall speed i think it feels almost the same maybe a little better for the CM10
in the CM10 you have the Gnow as written above....
Now the cons: i have a lot more app crashes in the CM10 then in the CM9 (btw generally its not a lot at all, but the 10 have more of them)
and i think the CM9 was more battery friendly...
one last thing i think that the latest CM10 nightlies are better then the stable one... but thats you own choice
anyway, i like it new and shiny so im using the CM10 and i love it... you can always turn back to the CM9 if you're disappointed
*sorry for bad english
Allway fun to try the newest
Top reason for going from CM9 to CM10 (or 10.1) is to try the newest
I did try several version from older CM9 to newest CM10.1 - Nothing really exceptional, but always small neat improvements
For me battery and performance has been more or less the same ...
Thanks to all of you who replied.
This
Chipsi said:
Top reason for going from CM9 to CM10 (or 10.1) is to try the newest
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is not an issue for me (no offense), I need to have a stable and working phone, not to bother with constant flashing... I was just wondering if it is better to keep the CM9, or the newer performs better.
nameh said:
Thanks to all of you who replied.
This is not an issue for me (no offense), I need to have a stable and working phone, not to bother with constant flashing... I was just wondering if it is better to keep the CM9, or the newer performs better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It performs much better and it's rock stable (try Mackay ROM 1.6.1 which is based on CM10 but it's closer to stock JB). If you've been on JB once, you won't want to go back to ICS.
Sent from my Gameboy Color
BlueFlame4 said:
It performs much better and it's rock stable (try Mackay ROM 1.6.1 which is based on CM10 but it's closer to stock JB). If you've been on JB once, you won't want to go back to ICS.
Sent from my Gameboy Color
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, will give it a try. By the way is there a reason to go for nightly instead of a stable CM10?
Hi everyone in this forum,
Just a quick question, a friend of mine owns a SGS+ I9001 and he's running stock rom, I wanted to install a custom rom for him, (I know I'm not supposed to ask these kind of questions) which rom do you recommend me, it needs to be as stable, fast and battery friendly as possible, I hope you could help me, thank you very much before hand!
Have a nice one!
thecrab93 said:
Hi everyone in this forum,
Just a quick question, a friend of mine owns a SGS+ I9001 and he's running stock rom, I wanted to install a custom rom for him, (I know I'm not supposed to ask these kind of questions) which rom do you recommend me, it needs to be as stable, fast and battery friendly as possible, I hope you could help me, thank you very much before hand!
Have a nice one!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All CM9 based roms are stable. Also the CM10 based roms are stable but they might have some bugs.
temeritas said:
All CM9 based roms are stable. Also the CM10 based roms are stable but they might have some bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much, do you recommend me any in particular and if so, why? Thanks again.
thecrab93 said:
Thank you very much, do you recommend me any in particular and if so, why? Thanks again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Ivendor's CM10 alpha 6 now. It works very well. But you should read in the SGS+ section what rom is the best for yourself. For myself Ivendor's CM10 is the best because I have now JB working on my phone like on a nexus device.
I agree that ivendor's Kernel are one of the most snappier ever so far.
Thank you guys, thank you very much, just another question, is ivendors CM10 stable enough for a person that knows very little about android to use as a daily driver? Thanks again!
thecrab93 said:
Thank you guys, thank you very much, just another question, is ivendors CM10 stable enough for a person that knows very little about android to use as a daily driver? Thanks again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO, it's not perfectly stable, because it's an ALPHA release, however most of us use it as a daily ROM. One or two random reboots in one month, some minor freezes - I think it's worth it, the performance is outstanding, especially with some 3.x.x. kernels. Anyway, wait for RC version, if you want stock rom - like stability.
You could also try one of the CM9 releases. They've been around longer and are probably more stable than the CM10 ones.
I'm using arco's release (can be found http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1650615) which has only very few quirks left. The only ones I run into sometimes are a problem with the compass (something strange is going on with the magnetic field sensor) and GMail / Facebook occasionally display only a white screen (which can be fixed by killing and restarting the app) (which can be mapped onto long-pressing the back button).
There's also ivendor's release, which has some other fixes but hasn't been updated for quite some time. There's also a number of remixes, an AOSP release by broodplank, AOKP, and MIUI.
Basicly, there's a list here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901212
The JB's are bound to have some bugs, don't flash them if you don't plan on updating as well. ICS is probably rather stable and most GB releases are probably stable as well.
Fastest: probably AOSP (so brood's release) and JB (project butter and all)
Most battery-friendly: GB
Stable: anything but JB
temeritas said:
I'm using Ivendor's CM10 alpha 6 now. It works very well. But you should read in the SGS+ section what rom is the best for yourself. For myself Ivendor's CM10 is the best because I have now JB working on my phone like on a nexus device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mikroos said:
I agree that ivendor's Kernel are one of the most snappier ever so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jacol82 said:
NO, it's not perfectly stable, because it's an ALPHA release, however most of us use it as a daily ROM. One or two random reboots in one month, some minor freezes - I think it's worth it, the performance is outstanding, especially with some 3.x.x. kernels. Anyway, wait for RC version, if you want stock rom - like stability.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Marshian said:
You could also try one of the CM9 releases. They've been around longer and are probably more stable than the CM10 ones.
I'm using arco's release (can be found http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1650615) which has only very few quirks left. The only ones I run into sometimes are a problem with the compass (something strange is going on with the magnetic field sensor) and GMail / Facebook occasionally display only a white screen (which can be fixed by killing and restarting the app) (which can be mapped onto long-pressing the back button).
There's also ivendor's release, which has some other fixes but hasn't been updated for quite some time. There's also a number of remixes, an AOSP release by broodplank, AOKP, and MIUI.
Basicly, there's a list here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901212
The JB's are bound to have some bugs, don't flash them if you don't plan on updating as well. ICS is probably rather stable and most GB releases are probably stable as well.
Fastest: probably AOSP (so brood's release) and JB (project butter and all)
Most battery-friendly: GB
Stable: anything but JB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok guys, thanks so much, I think I'll stick with arco's cm9 release so my friend can try it for a while and see if it's ok, thanks again