Related
Hi All
Now Cyanogen Team said they will stop working on CM9 and they release Stable version but when I went to check the Nightly ROM I found they still working on it.
Stable mean no bugs and Nightly under upgrading to become stable.
Why they release stable ROM.
Who will explain this?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
mgra99 said:
Why they release stable ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as i understand... When the Nightlies become better and better the developers start a feature freeze. This means no new functions or crazy experiments - just bughunting! This is made in the RC (Release Candidate) builds. If everyone is satisfied with the RC builds, it is getting stable status.
The work on new nightlies is parallel to this process, i think!
mgra99 said:
Who will explain this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Explain what? Explain the new nightlies?
No developer would throw ICS out of the window, just because JB hit the market. Look, there are still cm7-nightlies on cyanogen build machines!
Rush
You should keep in mind that some newer version might not work well even when the development has finished due to hardware limitations.So people might want to have the maximum working version on their devices. Hipothetically if Jelly bean won't work well on our devices, then atleast we'll have a bug free ICS rom.
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
vizzy said:
It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm torn between the two! On the one hand, I want a stable ROM which would be CM9, but I also love that JellyBean goodness. I've also seen some people here that simply want a stable CM9 that's up to date, and other's that want the latest CM10 despite bugs. That's the point of this thread
I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?
My vote goes towards CM9! been using codename for the past couple months and although i'm enjoying all the new features, i still find myself yearning for a rock solid & stable ASOP based build.
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
linezero said:
I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could give it a try, but if nik and others couldn't get a 3.0 kernel up and running for AOSP, then I'll have a damn hard time. I'd prefer to have someone else make the new kernel, I don't know much about compiling them. Till then, I would just use X-ICS4.0 for the kernel.
Make a CM9, CM10 would have in the end too much bugs and they would just chance again. I'm waiting for a stable cm9 anyway
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Kernel 3, Cm10 got my vote
sent from my jellybean device
ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!
Yeah. CM9 would be OK for me too. I can help with testing if needed.
But what would be those great JB features we would be missing out? Sry I haven't been following the differences between 4.0 and 4.1.
IncS community is desperate for at least one fully functional, bugless AOSP ROM, so my vote goes for CM9
CM9 bro..wishing for bugless one.. gud luck..
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
My 2 cents.
CM9. Kernel sources for ICS has been release by HTC and ANY AOSP rom that is stable would be very welcome in our community.
(I know there is gingerbread roms.. But.. Its ginger bread..)
Jelly Bean is nice and all,
But the odds of getting a stable AOSP rom are much higher with cm9.
CM9 I would say. I hope you can fix data problems for Vodafone NL users. We always have problems with data connection on AOSP ROMs.
CM9 would be great....!!
Its great to see devs are enthusiasticaly working on Roms..!!
You are the one dude...
Jst for info u might already aware of
This thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1914015
CM10 test build
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
my vote a CM9 ASOP rom and bugless
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
naathaanb96 said:
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree. I don't like much sense ROMs, CM9 with working camera and camcorder would be perfect!
Thanks ZaySk
CM9!!!!
ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My request would be neither CM9 nor CM 10.... it will be great if you can work on Kernel Version 3.... Becz that is the only roadblock for us for Jelly Bean and would open doors for may developers to come up with fresh and exciting jelly bean ROMs.....Why stay behind the world guys... lets target Jelly bean step by step.....who knows if you start working on kernel it may really turn out to be good.....Try for kernel bro......all the best.. try to compile it from source....
A rock solid cm9 would be great!
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Sorry guys, my google-fu and xda-search-fu is turning up nothing. I'm looking for a proper Cyanogenmod 7.2 release for the verizon cdma tab. Does that exist? I'm mostly seeing modded stock GB builds.
Also, as a side question, why do the galaxy tabs have a proper cm9/10 release when the 3.0.x kernel hasn't been released from samsung? Just wondering, because it seems like there are phones that don't have a proper cm9/10 release when they have pretty solid builds working off the 2.6.x kernel too.
Thanks!
I don't think it is any CM7.
Any reason for looking CM7 only?
There is a good CM9 (stable 9.1) and nightlies CM10 if you look here: http://get.cm/?device=p1c
I hope it helps.
Brgds
I ran a CM10 nightly, and it seemed to be pretty unstable. Data would come and go, and the interface was slow a lot of the time. I currently have the 9.1 CM9 on it. Much better, but I thought I might try a proper CM7 build if there existed one to see if how smooth and stable it was.
ypsmav said:
I don't think it is any CM7.
Any reason for looking CM7 only?
There is a good CM9 (stable 9.1) and nightlies CM10 if you look here: http://get.cm/?device=p1c
I hope it helps.
Brgds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi all,
what is the difference (in performance, stability, usability, features) between CM9 and CM10? What are the drawbacks and negatives? Is it worth upgrading? I
I am currently on a CM9 stable which I find very stable and functional.
Any help appreciated. Thanks
nameh said:
Hi all,
what is the difference (in performance, stability, usability, features) between CM9 and CM10? What are the drawbacks and negatives? Is it worth upgrading? I
I am currently on a CM9 stable which I find very stable and functional.
Any help appreciated. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would think its definitely worth it. CM9 is outdated, first of all, and second, CM10 is Jellybean, meaning it has project butter improvements that CM9 (ICS) does not. You can feel a big difference in speed, both browser and around the ROM when you upgrade. I definitely recommend trying Slimbean or CM10. CM10 is just as stable as CM9, IMO. CM9 also doesnt have GNow, unlike CM10. (You could probably get Gnow for ICS too, but it just wont be as good as Jellybean's Google Now) Good Luck, hope you upgrade! Battery life is pretty good for me too.
PS I know it shows on my signature that I have a Vibrant and not an i9000, but that doesn't change the fact that CM10 is obviously faster than CM9. If I were you, I would make a Nandroid of CM9 and flash CM10 to try it out. Most people are already on it and absolutely love it.
Hello,
So, I had the same dilemma as you having now... until about a month ago i had the CM9 and then i switched to the CM 10, i used the CM 9 for about two months and the CM9 stable from when it got out to the air.
in my opinion CM10 have a lot faster browser, a lot of little nice tweaks and little changes that are great (e.g. fast redialing, retexting etc.) About the overall speed i think it feels almost the same maybe a little better for the CM10
in the CM10 you have the Gnow as written above....
Now the cons: i have a lot more app crashes in the CM10 then in the CM9 (btw generally its not a lot at all, but the 10 have more of them)
and i think the CM9 was more battery friendly...
one last thing i think that the latest CM10 nightlies are better then the stable one... but thats you own choice
anyway, i like it new and shiny so im using the CM10 and i love it... you can always turn back to the CM9 if you're disappointed
*sorry for bad english
Allway fun to try the newest
Top reason for going from CM9 to CM10 (or 10.1) is to try the newest
I did try several version from older CM9 to newest CM10.1 - Nothing really exceptional, but always small neat improvements
For me battery and performance has been more or less the same ...
Thanks to all of you who replied.
This
Chipsi said:
Top reason for going from CM9 to CM10 (or 10.1) is to try the newest
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is not an issue for me (no offense), I need to have a stable and working phone, not to bother with constant flashing... I was just wondering if it is better to keep the CM9, or the newer performs better.
nameh said:
Thanks to all of you who replied.
This is not an issue for me (no offense), I need to have a stable and working phone, not to bother with constant flashing... I was just wondering if it is better to keep the CM9, or the newer performs better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It performs much better and it's rock stable (try Mackay ROM 1.6.1 which is based on CM10 but it's closer to stock JB). If you've been on JB once, you won't want to go back to ICS.
Sent from my Gameboy Color
BlueFlame4 said:
It performs much better and it's rock stable (try Mackay ROM 1.6.1 which is based on CM10 but it's closer to stock JB). If you've been on JB once, you won't want to go back to ICS.
Sent from my Gameboy Color
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, will give it a try. By the way is there a reason to go for nightly instead of a stable CM10?
Hi everyone in this forum,
Just a quick question, a friend of mine owns a SGS+ I9001 and he's running stock rom, I wanted to install a custom rom for him, (I know I'm not supposed to ask these kind of questions) which rom do you recommend me, it needs to be as stable, fast and battery friendly as possible, I hope you could help me, thank you very much before hand!
Have a nice one!
thecrab93 said:
Hi everyone in this forum,
Just a quick question, a friend of mine owns a SGS+ I9001 and he's running stock rom, I wanted to install a custom rom for him, (I know I'm not supposed to ask these kind of questions) which rom do you recommend me, it needs to be as stable, fast and battery friendly as possible, I hope you could help me, thank you very much before hand!
Have a nice one!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All CM9 based roms are stable. Also the CM10 based roms are stable but they might have some bugs.
temeritas said:
All CM9 based roms are stable. Also the CM10 based roms are stable but they might have some bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much, do you recommend me any in particular and if so, why? Thanks again.
thecrab93 said:
Thank you very much, do you recommend me any in particular and if so, why? Thanks again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Ivendor's CM10 alpha 6 now. It works very well. But you should read in the SGS+ section what rom is the best for yourself. For myself Ivendor's CM10 is the best because I have now JB working on my phone like on a nexus device.
I agree that ivendor's Kernel are one of the most snappier ever so far.
Thank you guys, thank you very much, just another question, is ivendors CM10 stable enough for a person that knows very little about android to use as a daily driver? Thanks again!
thecrab93 said:
Thank you guys, thank you very much, just another question, is ivendors CM10 stable enough for a person that knows very little about android to use as a daily driver? Thanks again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO, it's not perfectly stable, because it's an ALPHA release, however most of us use it as a daily ROM. One or two random reboots in one month, some minor freezes - I think it's worth it, the performance is outstanding, especially with some 3.x.x. kernels. Anyway, wait for RC version, if you want stock rom - like stability.
You could also try one of the CM9 releases. They've been around longer and are probably more stable than the CM10 ones.
I'm using arco's release (can be found http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1650615) which has only very few quirks left. The only ones I run into sometimes are a problem with the compass (something strange is going on with the magnetic field sensor) and GMail / Facebook occasionally display only a white screen (which can be fixed by killing and restarting the app) (which can be mapped onto long-pressing the back button).
There's also ivendor's release, which has some other fixes but hasn't been updated for quite some time. There's also a number of remixes, an AOSP release by broodplank, AOKP, and MIUI.
Basicly, there's a list here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901212
The JB's are bound to have some bugs, don't flash them if you don't plan on updating as well. ICS is probably rather stable and most GB releases are probably stable as well.
Fastest: probably AOSP (so brood's release) and JB (project butter and all)
Most battery-friendly: GB
Stable: anything but JB
temeritas said:
I'm using Ivendor's CM10 alpha 6 now. It works very well. But you should read in the SGS+ section what rom is the best for yourself. For myself Ivendor's CM10 is the best because I have now JB working on my phone like on a nexus device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mikroos said:
I agree that ivendor's Kernel are one of the most snappier ever so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jacol82 said:
NO, it's not perfectly stable, because it's an ALPHA release, however most of us use it as a daily ROM. One or two random reboots in one month, some minor freezes - I think it's worth it, the performance is outstanding, especially with some 3.x.x. kernels. Anyway, wait for RC version, if you want stock rom - like stability.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Marshian said:
You could also try one of the CM9 releases. They've been around longer and are probably more stable than the CM10 ones.
I'm using arco's release (can be found http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1650615) which has only very few quirks left. The only ones I run into sometimes are a problem with the compass (something strange is going on with the magnetic field sensor) and GMail / Facebook occasionally display only a white screen (which can be fixed by killing and restarting the app) (which can be mapped onto long-pressing the back button).
There's also ivendor's release, which has some other fixes but hasn't been updated for quite some time. There's also a number of remixes, an AOSP release by broodplank, AOKP, and MIUI.
Basicly, there's a list here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901212
The JB's are bound to have some bugs, don't flash them if you don't plan on updating as well. ICS is probably rather stable and most GB releases are probably stable as well.
Fastest: probably AOSP (so brood's release) and JB (project butter and all)
Most battery-friendly: GB
Stable: anything but JB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok guys, thanks so much, I think I'll stick with arco's cm9 release so my friend can try it for a while and see if it's ok, thanks again