[Q] Overclock in FroyoPro or FroyoBread? (your experiences) - XPERIA X8 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Hi,
Seeing how well all the modifications to my phone are doing, I would like to start experimenting with overclocking a bit.
I have FroyoPro v2.5 installed, which is based on FroyoBread, so I would guess that overclocking on FroyoBread would have more or less the same effects as on FroyoPro. I'm on stock kernel, so overclocking would have to be done via modules. Overclock and undervolt modules are already resident in the system, but are not active as long as I don't rename them to their actual extensions.
So, what experiences do you guys have with overclocking on these two systems? Is it a good thing to do, or perhaps something to better avoid?
I've read somewhere that Froyo ROMs behave badly when an overclock is performed, but then again these two ROMs have a lot of things in common with GingerBread (for example, Xperia Active Launcher works flawlessly in FroyoPro, even though it has problems with FCs on a typical Froyo ROM). I would not want to screw up the device now that I'm beginning to adore it

I would advise you against overclocking if it's unnecessary for smooth performance. Froyo should run smooth on the X8 without any overclocking, so it's better to avoid it.

I overclocked Froyobread v23b and dam it!! I play Jetpack Joyride whit almost 0% lag!
Cheers,
Mistev

I over clocked froyo pro 2.5 up to 729mhz
I crossed that and found that device rebooted during multitask.
On stock kernel
Unfortunately stock kernel didn't support undervolt
sent from ultimate device

xWhiskey said:
Hi,
Seeing how well all the modifications to my phone are doing, I would like to start experimenting with overclocking a bit.
I have FroyoPro v2.5 installed, which is based on FroyoBread, so I would guess that overclocking on FroyoBread would have more or less the same effects as on FroyoPro. I'm on stock kernel, so overclocking would have to be done via modules. Overclock and undervolt modules are already resident in the system, but are not active as long as I don't rename them to their actual extensions.
So, what experiences do you guys have with overclocking on these two systems? Is it a good thing to do, or perhaps something to better avoid?
I've read somewhere that Froyo ROMs behave badly when an overclock is performed, but then again these two ROMs have a lot of things in common with GingerBread (for example, Xperia Active Launcher works flawlessly in FroyoPro, even though it has problems with FCs on a typical Froyo ROM). I would not want to screw up the device now that I'm beginning to adore it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope... oc'ed froyopro does not give any problem.. i have never oc'ed froyobread though
till 806 it wont give problem.. you go on 825 and run any app then phone will restart...

729 the best for every day use and for players

I haven't found one instance where overclocking in stock kernel brought a better experience.
What's more some games will close when overclocking is active, true for 710 and 729.

nag xperia said:
729 the best for every day use and for players
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I said
sent from ultimate device
---------- Post added at 10:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:49 PM ----------
Fortun said:
I haven't found one instance where overclocking in stock kernel brought a better experience.
What's more some games will close when overclocking is active, true for 710 and 729.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The game which requires lots of RAM
They will make your device unconscious
Overclocking do but not that much,
Cause when ram goes out it demand CPU powers to make your device work properly
sent from ultimate device
I helped:what:
Press :thumbup:

azeez9992 said:
The game which requires lots of RAM
They will make your device unconscious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please explain how the clock speed will affect the available RAM.
Also name one of these games that will actually benefit of overclocking in stock kernel.

Fortun said:
Please explain how the clock speed will affect the available RAM.
Also name one of these games that will actually benefit of overclocking in stock kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Angry birds star wars
Making my device unconscious time to time
And stock kernel:what:
I don't like
Cause it didn't under volt CPU + I didn't get l3atest CWM
Right now!
nAa jb
sent from ultimate device
---------- Post added at 10:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:13 PM ----------
Fortun said:
Please explain how the clock speed will affect the available RAM.
Also name one of these games that will actually benefit of overclocking in stock kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everybody knows that how much ram we will get that much CPU will be free
Haven't u seen charts in pc:what:
sent from ultimate device
I helped:what:
Press:thumbup:

azeez9992 said:
Angry birds star wars
Making my device unconscious time to time
And stock kernel:what:
I don't like
Cause it didn't under volt CPU + I didn't get l3atest CWM
Right now!
nAa jb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll check the game.
Now what you need to understand is that not everyone has the possibility of an unblocked bootloader (manufacturing date). Not for free anyway.
About undervolting, you can undervolt the CPU in stock kernel. What's more, most, if not all, of the custom ROMs already make use of the undervolt module created by doixanh.
Anyway, I think that a fair test would be to run Angry Birds Star Wars for twenty minutes on a freshly rebooted system after opening and closing three games. If I don't experience any lags, end of test. Any lags would make me reboot the system again, overclock, open and close the same three games and run the game.
And the reason the game is chocking in your phone is probably because you're running Jellybean. And in that case, you must overclock because the OS is by itself heavier.
By the way, what new feature does the latest CWM offer you that you cannot find in older builds?
azeez9992 said:
Everybody knows that how much ram we will get that much CPU will be free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're gonna have to work harder if you want me to understand you.

Fortun said:
I'll check the game.
Now what you need to understand is that not everyone has the possibility of an unblocked bootloader (manufacturing date). Not for free anyway.
About undervolting, you can undervolt the CPU in stock kernel. What's more, most, if not all, of the custom ROMs already make use of the undervolt module created by doixanh.
Anyway, I think that a fair test would be to run Angry Birds Star Wars for twenty minutes on a freshly rebooted system after opening and closing three games. If I don't experience any lags, end of test. Any lags would make me reboot the system again, overclock, open and close the same three games and run the game.
And the reason the game is chocking in your phone is probably because you're running Jellybean. And in that case, you must overclock because the OS is by itself heavier.
By the way, what new feature does the latest CWM offer you that you cannot find in older builds?
You're gonna have to work harder if you want me to understand you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But bro I tried all os from donut to jellybean
My experience
GB is best one
And I haven't tried under volt module by doxianh
if I helped press thanks :thumbup:

Fortun is right. I don't have the privilege of an unlocked bootloader because attempting to do so would probably brick the phone (the serial code at the battery ends with 39, and you can only unlock successfully up to number 29). Any overclocking would have to be done on stock kernel.
Anyway, I tried to overclock today, and started with the default of 691 MHz. I don't know if I did something wrong, but I experienced a significant drop in performance. The AnTuTu benchmark returned the score of about 1500 after the overclock, and it used to return a number around 2200 before the overclock. Naturally, I restored the defaults and disabled the module.
So, how normal is this reaction for FroyoPro on stock kernel? Should I drop this overclocking idea completely or is there something I missed? What is that second overclocking module about (x8oc20.ko)? I can't seem to find any info about it.

xWhiskey said:
Fortun is right. I don't have the privilege of an unlocked bootloader because attempting to do so would probably brick the phone (the serial code at the battery ends with 39, and you can only unlock successfully up to number 29). Any overclocking would have to be done on stock kernel.
Anyway, I tried to overclock today, and started with the default of 691 MHz. I don't know if I did something wrong, but I experienced a significant drop in performance. The AnTuTu benchmark returned the score of about 1500 after the overclock, and it used to return a number around 2200 before the overclock. Naturally, I restored the defaults and disabled the module.
So, how normal is this reaction for FroyoPro on stock kernel? Should I drop this overclocking idea completely or is there something I missed? What is that second overclocking module about (x8oc20.ko)? I can't seem to find any info about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Vo vo vo wait a min my ends with 49 and I unlocked successfully:what:
if I helped press :thumbup:
---------- Post added at 01:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:08 PM ----------
xWhiskey said:
Fortun is right. I don't have the privilege of an unlocked bootloader because attempting to do so would probably brick the phone (the serial code at the battery ends with 39, and you can only unlock successfully up to number 29). Any overclocking would have to be done on stock kernel.
Anyway, I tried to overclock today, and started with the default of 691 MHz. I don't know if I did something wrong, but I experienced a significant drop in performance. The AnTuTu benchmark returned the score of about 1500 after the overclock, and it used to return a number around 2200 before the overclock. Naturally, I restored the defaults and disabled the module.
So, how normal is this reaction for FroyoPro on stock kernel? Should I drop this overclocking idea completely or is there something I missed? What is that second overclocking module about (x8oc20.ko)? I can't seem to find any info about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used froyo pro
Don't over clock
And second module
I didn't find any use.
To my froyo pro fast I taken some files from jimdem cm7tweaks and put it in that
if I helped press :thumbup:
---------- Post added at 01:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:13 PM ----------
1 more things bro
Bootloader
Didn't matter fro which number i t ends
Look at that
10w29-safe to unlock
10w49- safe to unlock
11w29-safe to unlock
11w49 - device can be bricked, somewhere listen that can be unlocked via paid method.
12w29-can be unlocked by fast gsm it take charge.
12w49-same as 12w29.
So from 10w29 to 11w29 easy to unlock.
After that device can be hard brick
And
Didn't matter from which number it ends
matter that from which it starts.
if I helped press :thumbup:

My serial number is 11w39. At the unlock bootloader thread it said that I'm probably asking for a hard brick if I was to attempt to unlock. Sorry, I didn't know that the serial number can start with anything else other than 11. That's why I didn't pay it any attention.

xWhiskey said:
My serial number is 11w39. At the unlock bootloader thread it said that I'm probably asking for a hard brick if I was to attempt to unlock. Sorry, I didn't know that the serial number can start with anything else other than 11. That's why I didn't pay it any attention.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya it can hard brick
have u listen about fast gsm try that
But u have to pay some green leafs
if I helped press :thumbup:

azeez9992 said:
But bro I tried all os from donut to jellybean...
... And I haven't tried under volt module by doxianh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You must have tried FroyoBread, then you already tried the undervolt module.
And about Angry Birds Star Wars, I found no difference in performance with/without overclocking.
xWhiskey said:
Anyway, I tried to overclock today, and started with the default of 691 MHz. I don't know if I did something wrong, but I experienced a significant drop in performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try overclocking with values over 700. Go slow and try first with 710.
Also don't check the "Set it on boot" checkbox just yet until you find a stable speed.

Related

[Q] Overklocking and kernels

Hi!
I've struggled with my Incredible S for a long while now. Asked questions here and so on but haven't really got any answers.
Things went something like this: My mate rooted his and my IncS same time with Revolutionary. We both installed ARHD and overcloked to 1920mhz just for the lulz. Everything went just fine for a while for both of us, but then I decided to restore my apps sms etc from the stock rom with MyBackup (or what ever its called). Restore failed at some point and I needed to flash ARHD again.
Ever since my CPU hasn't been able to reach 1920mhz or anywhere close ever again. I've been flashing dozens for ROMs now and only few of them could be O/C to 1600mhz. Some freeze at 1152mhz instantly, others can be stable for few minutes and then crash.
My mate is running CM7 with enki-v0 kernel at max O/C without any problem. I tried CM7. It started to become unstable with default O/C after few days and I had to siwtch back to some Sense Rom that worked at normal O/C.
Why some kernels (forexmpl Quattro beta 6) allow me to O/C at 1.6Ghz and others freeze just at 1.1Ghz? (Affinity,Unity,Niks trinity, Quattro betas 7- Rc3)
And why my CPU can't reach the 1.9Ghz anymore? Could I **** something up and the CPU is broken now or is there something wrong with my rooting?
TL;DR Only few Roms and kernels allow O/C and with them its a pain in the ass cuz of unstability, why?
- And I'm not looking for solutions like "Flash to stock". I know how to get it stable, but then again 1Ghz stock ain't that cool.
How are you overclocking? I've never used CM7 before, but I do use SetCPU. Every time you flash a ROM you need to go into SetCPU and Device Selection and then Autodetect Speeds Recommended. Either that or you can try selecting Show Other Frequency Sets and pick your processor from there.
Basically the only thing I can think of is that your processor is not being recognised correctly.
BTW When you say "Everything went just fine for a while" how long is a 'while'? The only reason I ask is, how sure are you that running your processor smoothly at 1920mhz for that period wasn't just a fluke, and your phone (for whatever reason) cannot normally run at that speed? From what I understand, even phones of the same model can differ as to the speeds at which they can be overclocked. Maybe you just got lucky the first time, and now that lucks run out?
Dont you think that 1.9 ghz is a bit dumb... You might (have) damage(d) your cpu by doing that. If i would oc my 3ghz pc to 5ghz without cooling modification i would fry it in half an hour.
I mean cmmon use your brain. Oc it to smth logical like 30% (1.3 ghz) and you will not have such problems .... Sorry, but that just sounded plain stupid to me
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda premium
CyanideJack said:
How are you overclocking? I've never used CM7 before, but I do use SetCPU. Every time you flash a ROM you need to go into SetCPU and Device Selection and then Autodetect Speeds Recommended. Either that or you can try selecting Show Other Frequency Sets and pick your processor from there.
Basically the only thing I can think of is that your processor is not being recognised correctly.
BTW When you say "Everything went just fine for a while" how long is a 'while'? The only reason I ask is, how sure are you that running your processor smoothly at 1920mhz for that period wasn't just a fluke, and your phone (for whatever reason) cannot normally run at that speed? From what I understand, even phones of the same model can differ as to the speeds at which they can be overclocked. Maybe you just got lucky the first time, and now that lucks run out?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use SetCpu and every time it recognizes automaticly some speeds and I use them. The manual setup is bit beyond my knowledge.
The while was something like 3 days or so. Hard to remember. But still wayy more than like few minutes. I will try to set SetCPU manually, thx!
Psyloid said:
Dont you think that 1.9 ghz is a bit dumb... You might (have) damage(d) your cpu by doing that. If i would oc my 3ghz pc to 5ghz without cooling modification i would fry it in half an hour.
I mean cmmon use your brain. Oc it to smth logical like 30% (1.3 ghz) and you will not have such problems .... Sorry, but that just sounded plain stupid to me
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know 1.9ghz is dumb. I used it back then only in short bursts. Usually scaling "interactive" between 245mhz - 1.5Ghz. Now even that is too much for most kernels. I thought that the freeze is caused by the CPU protecting itself from getting damaged or something, but not sure.
Still if the CPU was damaged, why would Quattro beta 6 kernel run at 1.6ghz without overheat or anything and RC3 kernel freezes at 1.1Ghz when try to load something more than homescreen..
I would use beta 6 kernel for quattro, but it does not support wifi in RC3.. Virtuous team made some changes to kernel at beta 7 and I would love to know what changes..
inSaN1Ty_X said:
I use SetCpu and every time it recognizes automaticly some speeds and I use them. The manual setup is bit beyond my knowledge.
The while was something like 3 days or so. Hard to remember. But still wayy more than like few minutes. I will try to set SetCPU manually, thx!
I know 1.9ghz is dumb. I used it back then only in short bursts. Usually scaling "interactive" between 245mhz - 1.5Ghz. Now even that is too much for most kernels. I thought that the freeze is caused by the CPU protecting itself from getting damaged or something, but not sure.
Still if the CPU was damaged, why would Quattro beta 6 kernel run at 1.6ghz without overheat or anything and RC3 kernel freezes at 1.1Ghz when try to load something more than homescreen..
I would use beta 6 kernel for quattro, but it does not support wifi in RC3.. Virtuous team made some changes to kernel at beta 7 and I would love to know what changes..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have a look at the changelog and the source code, both in the thread.
Nonverbose said:
have a look at the changelog and the source code, both in the thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From the source code I don't understand a single thing
and...
"New kernel V5 (new acpu table, updated GPU drivers)"
What is acpu table? GPU thing I get, but hardly it can prevent from O/C?

Your stable OC

Since every Ace is different and I just started messing with OC, whats your stable frequency? Mines is 844 D:
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Mine is 864MHz at 906 it turns off after 10 mins and is verrry HOT!
906mhz with very minor excess heating :laugh:
Mine is 921. it drains battery too fast but the speed is awesom
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Mine runs on 844Mhz and works smooth. Gets a little heated when playing HD games (NFS Shift) otherwise stable.
Battery usage is kinda ok as it is supposed to drain battery at OC
Aww mann I'm jealous of all you guys running on 900 D: mine reboots when I set it that high. Then freezes at 883 and apps crash at 864. Can that be changed with the kernel? Or is it still Ace specific?
Be very careful when OCing though. It can fry up the internal hardware.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Mine is pretty stable at 902Mhz... Very little heating and fully stable
My stable OC is 960Mhz.
979 = only last for 1 hour....then reboot
998 = last for 2 min(playing games) and reboot
1000++ = reboot after selecting those frequency
921Mhz for me
This was sent from a Galaxy Ace.
So any of you guys think this is kernel related or just Ace specific?
i think its ace specific....
i mean....2 same phone using same kernel, but different OC limit???
SuperAce609 said:
So any of you guys think this is kernel related or just Ace specific?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None....Its CPU specific.Its just like buying things from a store,sometimes you get faulty products,sometimes you get the best.BESIDES,some say that our CPU is factory OCed,but no one is sure about it :/ And,its just an armv6 obsolete **** We are still stuck in the 19th century
123r4ka456 said:
i think its ace specific....
i mean....2 same phone using same kernel, but different OC limit???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U should seriously do more searching and reading on the matter.
Prawesome said:
None....Its CPU specific.Its just like buying things from a store,sometimes you get faulty products,sometimes you get the best.BESIDES,some say that our CPU is factory OCed,but no one is sure about it :/ And,its just an armv6 obsolete **** We are still stuck in the 19th century
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh okay. I thought so. But doesn't switching to different kernels alter that pattern? Or the kernel simply allows the phone to go that high?
I have used the cf54 or 84 I think Kernel and [email protected] kernel and I was able to overclock until 1.25Hgz on the latter though I was unable to take it to 844 on the stock one.
Hence I would say that the Kernel would play a role in the OC limit of the ace. Having said that, I might be incorrect as I did flash custom ROM along with [email protected] which could play a role in the OC factor too.
Someone with moreprecise clarification ?
chitkaran said:
I have used the cf54 or 84 I think Kernel and [email protected] kernel and I was able to overclock until 1.25Hgz on the latter though I was unable to take it to 844 on the stock one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WTF how did you get 1.25ghz thats impossible ....
OR NOT WHO KNOWS
Man can you please post screenies of your 1.25GHz overclock!If it's true it's EPIC!=D
chitkaran said:
I have used the cf54 or 84 I think Kernel and [email protected] kernel and I was able to overclock until 1.25Hgz on the latter though I was unable to take it to 844 on the stock one.
Hence I would say that the Kernel would play a role in the OC limit of the ace. Having said that, I might be incorrect as I did flash custom ROM along with [email protected] which could play a role in the OC factor too.
Someone with moreprecise clarification ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't believe you. The Ace is already OCed from factory. It can barely reach 900Mhz as it is and only for few.
But if you did, I'm surprised you're still using your phone to this day without a fried motherboard.
SuperAce609 said:
Oh okay. I thought so. But doesn't switching to different kernels alter that pattern? Or the kernel simply allows the phone to go that high?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Partly.Kernels like Cf-root are basic kernels,even Chainfire himself says so.It just takes him 5 minutes to build a cf-root kernel(What he said in an interview)..Kernels to "some extend" define it but the final decision-maker is the CPU.
---------- Post added at 06:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:13 PM ----------
ANDROIDCUSTOMIZe said:
Man can you please post screenies of your 1.25GHz overclock!If it's true it's EPIC!=D
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think its true.....Because Ace is clocked at 800Mhz,that too factory OCed from 600Mhz.Also,our CPU is armv6,so its "PRACTICALLY" impossible to OC to such a high limit.
Prawesome said:
Partly.Kernels like Cf-root are basic kernels,even Chainfire himself says so.It just takes him 5 minutes to build a cf-root kernel(What he said in an interview)..Kernels to "some extend" define it but the final decision-maker is the CPU.
I can get 902 mhz on CF root,But on delano 998 Is somewhat stable.so yes kernels play a role in this.
---------- Post added at 06:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:13 PM ----------
I don't think its true.....Because Ace is clocked at 800Mhz,that too factory OCed from 600Mhz.Also,our CPU is armv6,so its "PRACTICALLY" impossible to OC to such a high limit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Armv6 doesnt make a difference.E.G. look at SG3,armv6 cpu but almost every SG3 reaches 1200 mhz 100% stable(Few reach even 1400).1.25 ghz=1036mhz,which is available freq. in ketut's blackhawk kernel so MIGHT be achievable.And Ace's cpu is 'turbo' msm7227,means can maintain 800mhz clock for longer time with less heat/at no extra voltage, not that it is oc'd 800 mhz.But I can be wrong

[Q] Thinking about buying the 4XHD

Hi everyone, I'm thinking of buying the 4XHD as I can get it for a very good price (far cheaper than the one x or S3).
I have a few questions about the phone though, and reading the forums brought up more questions.
1. Are there actually any Kernels or Roms for the phone as I cant find any in the developer section and has the phone actually got a unlocked bootloader as some people said they had, others they hadn't.
2. What are the chances of the phone either getting an official 4.1 update or getting an unlocked bootloader (I can't tell if it already is) with which a custom 4.1 ROM can be flashed onto the phone.
3. How well does the 4XHD actually do in games as in my research I found one thread about lag and that is all. How do games like Nova 3, Asphalt 7 and Need For Speed: Most Wanted play? On the nexus 7, nova 3 (without custom kernel) was really laggy and I'm wondering how it will perform on the 4XHD.
4. Secondly, without a new Kernel being developed, is there currently anyway to overclock the GPU in the phone as I have read on one post about changing the kernel governor (here) or is this just using SetCPU?
5. Regarding SetCPU, does it help out with gaming performance the same way it helped out the One X (or was that purely because the one x used the Ondemand governor, which performs worse than the Interactive governor of the stock 4XHD)?
Thankyou everyone for reading this.
There are no Rom or kernels but u can under clock the CPU and i use no frills CPU to have the phone running. On 760 MHz and 51 and it performs well for gaming I just put it on the highest and no lag. I would install a CPU app because it seems that without it on it when u listen to music it skips quite frequently with screen of but with an CPU manager it is fixed even on 51 it won't skip. Other then that. I do not have any of the lag other report. It is a very capable phone. I would not install setcpu it does not seem to stick and work right. I tried to set it back to 1500 with setcpu and it stopped at 1ghz but no frills CPU works with no issue. I hope that helps u somewhat.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Thanks, if you are using Nofrills and you set the min CPU clock higher does this actually translate into better gaming performance (does it change the governor and the GPU performance ) or is it just better for saving battery life when you don't need high performance? Do you actually need any extra speed or is it fine in games - the one x, even taking into consideration the larger user base, there seems to be far more laggy games complaints.
Yes I set it too 1500 min and max and i have no lag I also select governor power no lag. I hope it works for. Don't forget after done with gaming to change the CPU back to how busy want it and also not to use power because then I always stays at the possible highest CPU u selected.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 03:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:21 PM ----------
For gaming do performance otherwise do not. And the hox seems to still have a less optimize tegra 3 supports in it. The 4x hd is faster.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 03:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:22 PM ----------
Also u might wanna consider when playing games to like really turn everything off so u want sync with anything or text really I know it sucks but turning of dta and cellular and then playing games will make for no lag also make sure u pretty much cleared all running apps as well.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Ok Thanks, that basically answers all of my concerns. I,m not too sure about getting 4.1 (Custom ROM or not) but it isn't that necessary. 4.0 is still great.
hi
MrKalo said:
Hi everyone, I'm thinking of buying the 4XHD as I can get it for a very good price (far cheaper than the one x or S3).
I have a few questions about the phone though, and reading the forums brought up more questions.
1. Are there actually any Kernels or Roms for the phone as I cant find any in the developer section and has the phone actually got a unlocked bootloader as some people said they had, others they hadn't.
2. What are the chances of the phone either getting an official 4.1 update or getting an unlocked bootloader (I can't tell if it already is) with which a custom 4.1 ROM can be flashed onto the phone.
3. How well does the 4XHD actually do in games as in my research I found one thread about lag and that is all. How do games like Nova 3, Asphalt 7 and Need For Speed: Most Wanted play? On the nexus 7, nova 3 (without custom kernel) was really laggy and I'm wondering how it will perform on the 4XHD.
4. Secondly, without a new Kernel being developed, is there currently anyway to overclock the GPU in the phone as I have read on one post about changing the kernel governor (here) or is this just using SetCPU?
5. Regarding SetCPU, does it help out with gaming performance the same way it helped out the One X (or was that purely because the one x used the Ondemand governor, which performs worse than the Interactive governor of the stock 4XHD)?
Thankyou everyone for reading this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
buy it , its great piece of smartphone

[Q] Best Galaxy Ace Overclock Frequancy... And something else thanks

Hey guys
I know their probably another thread out there with this in it but... Yeah. But go ahead troll me lol, im still a bit of a noob.:silly:
Anyways, i have a Galaxy Ace s5830. I have Beats with smooth sense ROM. I had it upto 883MHz Yesterday but after i turned it off then back on ROM Toolbox reverted it to 806MHZ. 883MHz seemed a lot faster even though some people get theirs close to 1GHZ
My phone afterwards rebooting had issues such as the phone becoming un-responsive when i was even doing nothing (maybe the overclock to 883MHz had some short term effect?) But the phone seemed fine after safely turning it off then back on several times. Still works perfectly i got scared when it started to become un-responsive. But it works well now i have also used pimp my ROM, and the scripts work like a charm. Especially the call quality one (it uses bravia engine or something?). But with pimp my ROM wi-fi and network tweaks it completely broke wi-fi saying wi-fi connecting... Then saying under the network name 'Error'. Dam it took so long to get the IP address then said error like i said lol
At the frequency 883MHZ the phone seemed stable and faster than ever before, i did change it in small increments
So just wondering, what is the safe and most reliable frequencies to set it at? I currently use 225Min and 806 Max. With the userspace governer.
I know the terms of ' Safe ' and overclock don't mix (sorta like water and my dads S2 :crying: ).
Im also considering buying a 2450MAH battery from ebay for about 5.99 AUD. Any suggestions on should it be okay and better? But i mainly would like to knwo about the overclcoking lol.
So yeah, basically what is a good frequency to set it at? Is 883MHZ okay? Am i going to fry it out or completely brick or damage the phone or cpu if i set it at 883MHZ? Would love to buy a new phone but i need to save im only 14
So yeah please help me and you could help others too. Please be welcomed to troll me
I plan on having this phone another 3-4 Months before i consider buying the S2 or Galaxy note when their cheap (like really cheap)...
Like i said please help, and feel welcomed to troll me when you do help :highfive:
Man i feel like a Rebel when i overclock
That battery is a fake and has been confirmed as such. If you want a higher cap. battery get a 1500mAh or 1600mAh. I don't like messing with the clocking, good luck to you.
Thanks
Narwhal73 said:
That battery is a fake and has been confirmed as such. If you want a higher cap. battery get a 1500mAh or 1600mAh. I don't like messing with the clocking, good luck to you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for informing me that the battery is a fake ... But the seller has like 96%/100% seller rate or something?
Thanks for all your help, i hited like
Sorry for my 'Noobiness'.
What battery do you reccomend? or should i consider getting a AA battery to USB power charger?
i'm pretty comfortable with 825 or 844 mhz
It's pretty good with 614 MHz lol
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
Running smooth even on 614 Mhz.
Moderate usage.
King Android said:
Thank you for informing me that the battery is a fake ... But the seller has like 96%/100% seller rate or something?
Thanks for all your help, i hited like
Sorry for my 'Noobiness'.
What battery do you reccomend? or should i consider getting a AA battery to USB power charger?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right now I am just using the stock one. I personally wouldn't change my battery to anything other than stock, but people have reported that 1500mAh or 1600mAh work well. I wouldn't use anything that has a higher capacity than that though. Also, if it's very inexpensive it's probably not real.
Clocking actually goes on the rom. I've seen people having OC over 1gHz & still stable with the mad kernel but I gave up clocking as I didn't see much of a difference & also underclocking started giving me FCs on some heavy apps while it was all fair in the unclocked state. And again, there's no such thing as a best frequency. You find your own values. What works well for him might mess up your phone rebooting all by itself. Stock batteries are always fine & they also keep you under warranty. Anyone ever wondered why the phone manufacturers didn't implement clocking as a part of it ? Stability is the word. I've seen here, I've seen there. East or west, stock is the best ! Try keeping as close to stock as possible, just to have that extra touch of safety & stability
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Hello all.
I was reading this thread and became interested in overclocking. In my case my device is:
Samsung Galaxy Ace GT-S5830L (labeled as GT-S5830 by CyanogenMod)
CyanogenMod-7.2.0-cooper stable (Android version 2.3.7)
Kernel 2.6.35.7-perf-CL882825 ([email protected] #21)
I was checking in CM settings -> Performance -> CPU settings that I could adjust min and max clockspeed, but in max frequency the maximum one is the same processor's speed, 800 MHz. So my kernel doesn't support overclocking.
After a search in the forums I found there are plenty of custom kernels for this legacy device. But I'm relatively new to the kernel world, so I wanted to ask you for advise. What custom kernel could I try for my device for overclocking? Or King Android, what custom kernel are you using?
It'd the first time I do the overclocking stuff, I'd like to try it to see if some higher quality mp4 videos (which are run by MX Player only in software acceleration) can run better, as well as some games and emulators.
I'm also kind of a noob as you can see. If you want to troll/scold me...
Thank you all.
ctcx said:
Hello all.
I was reading this thread and [...]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi you can try FireKernel or BlackHawk kernel. Use the search function to find them easily. Both supports Overclocking and are made for CM7. [MAKE SURE THEY SUPPORT YOUR S5830L]
At the moment I'm with Democracy ROM which is based on unofficial CM7 and I don't really feel the need of overclocking. It is all smooth with firekernel at
Min 245
Max 806
Governor smartassv2
Sent from my... oh wait, who cares?
I did my search.
Maybe I forgot to mention I haven't installed a custom kernel before... Does the kernel come as a file itself, or along a CM7 custom rom? And if it comes as a file itself, how can I install it? I already mentioned what CM7 I have installed. It's the "official" stable one.
Would OCing help to improve videos and games performance? i.e, faster, no lag...
You can set it to whatever your phone can handle. Mine can't go past 844Mhz otherwise apps start force closing and such. If your phone is completely stable at 883Mhz then you're good.
As for the battery, no. It's a fake. Buy a 1500mAh like I did. Works like a charm and it brought 3. Lasts a little longer and it's really amazing. Had it for a while now. Still have one in the pack, only been using 2 when I don't get to charge my phone. Really handy.
---------- Post added at 03:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:03 AM ----------
ctcx said:
I did my search.
Maybe I forgot to mention I haven't installed a custom kernel before... Does the kernel come as a file itself, or along a CM7 custom rom? And if it comes as a file itself, how can I install it? I already mentioned what CM7 I have installed. It's the "official" stable one.
Would OCing help to improve videos and games performance? i.e, faster, no lag...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OCing helps the phone over all. But remember, without much free ram, OC won't really change much. You need a balance of ram and CPU. Like me, I use swap and OC to 844Mhz. Even if it's a low OC, it's still better than nothing.
1. @SuperAce609: I have 104 Mb free RAM out of 278 Mb total RAM. Mine is Galaxy Ace S5830L with CM 7.2. Would OC work for me? Up to what frequency?
And how can you have 600 Mb of RAM? Is your device really an Ace?
2. There's still a doubt I haven't been able to find out myself: does the kernel come as a file itself, or along a CM7 custom rom? And if it comes as a file itself, how can I install it? I was suggested FireKernel or BlackHawk ones...
Any help?
ctcx said:
1. @SuperAce609: I have 104 Mb free RAM out of 278 Mb total RAM. Mine is Galaxy Ace S5830L...
And how can you have 600 Mb of RAM...
2. There's still a doubt I haven't been able to find out myself: does the kernel come as a file itself, or along a CM7 custom rom? And if it comes as a file itself, how can I install it? I was suggested FireKernel or BlackHawk ones...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.- Every Ace is diferent..some Ace's can go up to 960 Mhz while other just 844 Mhz, the thing is: try it yourself overclocking in small jumps. Swap is a small amount of memory of your SD card, that Android use it like if where RAM, but decreases SD card life...
2.- Some Kernel came Built in on Some particullary ROM's but generally cames on a CWM Flashable zip; FireKernel & BlackHawk are specially for CM7; In my opinion FireKernel is the best... And there are others like Battery Extender Kernel or NimsKernel but these Kernel are only for Stock ROM's...
I hope you find useful my info...
Thank you, Blake2893.
Then there's just 2 doubts left, if you don't mind.
There's a fair number of custom CM7.2 roms with FireKernel in the developer forum. Is there one you or someone else could say is the best in terms of stability and least number of bugs? Or is that something I should test myself in the S5830L?
The Ace S5830/S5830L has 278 Mb total RAM by default. If I understand well, you're implying I could modify SWAP partition in order to increase RAM and, probably if lucky, with this make OC work better. How can I do that? Do I also need a custom kernel/rom for that?
The best stable Roms so far are the stock GingerBread based ones... but if you aks me about CM7 there a few like Apocalypse rom(ICS styled ROM) with the FireKernel that suports swap I think...
and for Swap you only need a Kernel with Swap enabled and a SWAP Partition on your Sd card...
lets see im fine and stable with 979 mhz without reboot for 9 hours
overclock is depend on your hardware
best over clock freq.
King Android said:
Hey guys
I know their probably another thread out there with this in it but... Yeah. But go ahead troll me lol, im still a bit of a noob.:silly:
Anyways, i have a Galaxy Ace s5830. I have Beats with smooth sense ROM. I had it upto 883MHz Yesterday but after i turned it off then back on ROM Toolbox reverted it to 806MHZ. 883MHz seemed a lot faster even though some people get theirs close to 1GHZ
My phone afterwards rebooting had issues such as the phone becoming un-responsive when i was even doing nothing (maybe the overclock to 883MHz had some short term effect?) But the phone seemed fine after safely turning it off then back on several times. Still works perfectly i got scared when it started to become un-responsive. But it works well now i have also used pimp my ROM, and the scripts work like a charm. Especially the call quality one (it uses bravia engine or something?). But with pimp my ROM wi-fi and network tweaks it completely broke wi-fi saying wi-fi connecting... Then saying under the network name 'Error'. Dam it took so long to get the IP address then said error like i said lol
At the frequency 883MHZ the phone seemed stable and faster than ever before, i did change it in small increments
So just wondering, what is the safe and most reliable frequencies to set it at? I currently use 225Min and 806 Max. With the userspace governer.
I know the terms of ' Safe ' and overclock don't mix (sorta like water and my dads S2 :crying: ).
Im also considering buying a 2450MAH battery from ebay for about 5.99 AUD. Any suggestions on should it be okay and better? But i mainly would like to knwo about the overclcoking lol.
So yeah, basically what is a good frequency to set it at? Is 883MHZ okay? Am i going to fry it out or completely brick or damage the phone or cpu if i set it at 883MHZ? Would love to buy a new phone but i need to save im only 14
So yeah please help me and you could help others too. Please be welcomed to troll me
I plan on having this phone another 3-4 Months before i consider buying the S2 or Galaxy note when their cheap (like really cheap)...
Like i said please help, and feel welcomed to troll me when you do help :highfive:
Man i feel like a Rebel when i overclock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best and most stable overclock freq. is actually 906mhz-864mhz. It works like a charm mate! Try it.
Cyb3rVect0r said:
The best and most stable overclock freq. is actually 906mhz-864mhz. It works like a charm mate! Try it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using CPU high frequencies is not recommended, your device's life will be reduced considerably

Good workaround (Kernel/Firmware) against overheating?

Hello guys I got some huge problems here.
I recently switched from my Z2 to the Z3+ and actually like the phone but the overheating is insane and especially kills Pokemon Go through CPU throttling, which runs smoothly on my old Z2 .
So far I am on 253, cleaned it up and tried a self modified and the zach beta9 Kernel and and runs quite bad on both. Is heating a lesser issue of 224? I actually do not want to reflash the whole system to 224 just to find out it doesn't get better.
Also is there a way to undervolt/underclock? I can change settings in Kernel Aduitor but I have the feeling the phone doesn't really care.
Help much appreciated - thanks!
Try Zach beta 8 kernel. Limit max cpu frequency by kernel auditor.
Still it's only your Goodluck if your device cools down. It's a bitter truth about this model.
waseemakhtar said:
Try Zach beta 8 kernel. Limit max cpu frequency by kernel auditor.
Still it's only your Goodluck if your device cools down. It's a bitter truth about this model.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a clue whether 224 or 256 make a difference?
I will try beta8 and report back.
Delvius said:
Do you have a clue whether 224 or 256 make a difference?
I will try beta8 and report back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no there was no thermal improvements between these builds, dont flash your system back
but do underclock and tell us the results!
Im also affected by your exact problem
Try this kernel, seems promising. I haven't tried it since it doesnt have twrp.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xpe...m5z-kernel-t3421630/post67813517#post67813517
Edit: Today I have flashed 256, haven't found any improvement. As per my experience 256 haven't brought any noticable change.
**** posted twice and dont know how to delete
Thank you for the replies!
Tested zach beta8, didn't help. Now I am testing http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-z4/orig-development/kernel-om5z-kernel-t3421630/ as suggested and if that doesn't help much also with http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-z4/general/kill-overheating-flash-zip-t3421782.
And Stamina Mode helps at least a bit.
Statusreport: It always runs bad. But best at the moment with root patched Stock Kernel (253) and that underclocking zip. Although I think that underclocking doesn't really help at all.
Delvius said:
Statusreport: It always runs bad. But best at the moment with root patched Stock Kernel (253) and that underclocking zip. Although I think that underclocking doesn't really help at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are your temps? When does it start to throttle? Done any thermal-conf configuration to allow more heat?
---------- Post added at 21:03 ---------- Previous post was at 20:58 ----------
I know that @Trilliard has a very good and stable cpu governor where he has disabled two of the little and two of the big cores, this helps a lot if you underclock the remaining 4
Here are his files:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-z4/general/dont-custom-kernels-want-to-avoid-idle-t3409647
UPDATE: Added my edited files used to apply CPU tweaks (cores down clocked to 0.9 and 1.2ghz, two core disabled, tweaked cpu governor, power and others mods) and these files located in etc folder. Replace them and set correct permissions then reboot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bjowol said:
What are your temps? When does it start to throttle? Done any thermal-conf configuration to allow more heat?
---------- Post added at 21:03 ---------- Previous post was at 20:58 ----------
I know that @Trilliard has a very good and stable cpu governor where he has disabled two of the little and two of the big cores, this helps a lot if you underclock the remaining 4
Here are his files:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-z4/general/dont-custom-kernels-want-to-avoid-idle-t3409647
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I didn't know about this combination - I will try it thanks!
Do you know about a thermal-conf? Actually never tried one. The phone gets hot indeed but I still think there might be some space before it actually melts.
Delvius said:
Actually I didn't know about this combination - I will try it thanks!
Do you know about a thermal-conf? Actually never tried one. The phone gets hot indeed but I still think there might be some space before it actually melts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what i thought as well i have my own here, its based on another persos post, but i dont remember where...
Anyways, his camera mod worked, but cpu throttle was not tampered with, and it caused a very unbalanced throttling... Ok yay i can use the camera linger and fluently, but when i exit the camera app, i cant use the phone couse its runnig at 348 mhz...
So i i did some modifications to it cpu never get under 840 for little cores, so your phones menues end web browsing are always safe from performance drops.
I made it to be able to play Pokemon go, and achieved a lot better resault than without any changes.. still prefer playing on my shield tablet, but if i dont have it around when theres a lot od pokestops nearby, then this will work for me.
While playing Pokemon go it does not go over 80 degrees, but using snapshat it can get to 85, so dont use snap for to long
Let me know if it worked for you!
bjowol said:
Thats what i thought as well i have my own here, its based on another persos post, but i dont remember where...
Anyways, his camera mod worked, but cpu throttle was not tampered with, and it caused a very unbalanced throttling... Ok yay i can use the camera linger and fluently, but when i exit the camera app, i cant use the phone couse its runnig at 348 mhz...
So i i did some modifications to it cpu never get under 840 for little cores, so your phones menues end web browsing are always safe from performance drops.
I made it to be able to play Pokemon go, and achieved a lot better resault than without any changes.. still prefer playing on my shield tablet, but if i dont have it around when theres a lot od pokestops nearby, then this will work for me.
While playing Pokemon go it does not go over 80 degrees, but using snapshat it can get to 85, so dont use snap for to long
Let me know if it worked for you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh nice! Thank you a lot! I will totally try it out directly when PTC comes back alive. X)
What kernel and governors do you use?
Delvius said:
Oh nice! Thank you a lot! I will totally try it out directly when PTC comes back alive. X)
What kernel and governors do you use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im using stock kernel, may switch to another soon. Im using stock bcause of batterylife and idle power consumption
Im using the governor and cpu modifications in this post ; http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-z4/general/dont-custom-kernels-want-to-avoid-idle-t3409647
Hmm. Still runs ****ty.
Can anyone give me a short guide how to edit thermal and governors?
According to my observations the phone gets hot and then cold. I think the throttle is more aggressive and needed and I want to make it less aggressive.
Update:
I made my own modifications to the thermal engine. It is pretty bad for battery I guess but I had a very good expierence playing Pokemon Go with it today. Yes the phone gets hot. Like it doesn't drop below 70°C while playing and regulary hits 80°C but it works good. No dark screen, no 0 CPUs downclocking. So far it's fine for me, maybe I get squeeze even more out of it.
Delvius said:
Update:
I made my own modifications to the thermal engine. It is pretty bad for battery I guess but I had a very good expierence playing Pokemon Go with it today. Yes the phone gets hot. Like it doesn't drop below 70°C while playing and regulary hits 80°C but it works good. No dark screen, no 0 CPUs downclocking. So far it's fine for me, maybe I get squeeze even more out of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done any other modifications to your file for a while? Or is it working good for you now? What's your SoT?
bjowol said:
Done any other modifications to your file for a while? Or is it working good for you now? What's your SoT?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still working good for me. Not sure if I can really squeeze out more and as long as it works at the moment I do not have a good motivation to try anything else.
No idea about SoT. Always running around with a powerbank. Probably bad, it is not designed for good battery life.
Delvius said:
Still working good for me. Not sure if I can really squeeze out more and as long as it works at the moment I do not have a good motivation to try anything else.
No idea about SoT. Always running around with a powerbank. Probably bad, it is not designed for good battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Allright thanks i might try your conf if i cant get mine to work like I want

Categories

Resources