Hello to all,
The Maclawstudio have announced that they are working on kernel 3.0 for galaxy Ace / Gio.
All those who are interested to port this kernel by Ace / Gio in galaxy mini, please contact me.
I do not think it will be so difficult
Please contact me(pm) :highfive:
greetings
Ma-90 @
Request
Can u also port his cm10.1.
Venomstar said:
Can u also port his cm10.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but I do not think there is a need for mini already there
reported .....mods may close this thread..
and dude if you want help goto either general or q and a section.....
post here only when you are done with the project..
Nice idea.. i would really like to join you in that.. but, i hv no time till 16th may..
Can I join you after my exam which will end on 16th may. ?
OJ said:
Nice idea.. i would really like to join you in that.. but, i hv no time till 16th may..
Can I join you after my exam which will end on 16th may. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ofcourse
MaclawStudio just takes psyke83's work and again saying it's his. What a tool - same for everything else - taken from androidarmv6. And people still download his builds. Pathetic. Then keeps everything closed source (even the kernel, lol) so nobody can see that. x) Just haven't got enough words to describe this "developer"
i dont care if its stolen, remaked, rearanged, modified, etc...the truth is gonna come along with punishment (sound like Jehova whitness), as long as this 3 kernel works...
I don't know if you're aware of that, but erikcas is working on it since the day psyke83 ported it. He never brags about it. The problem is that Ace/Gio/Mini/Fit uses closed source FSR drivers which don't work on 3.x kernel (yet)
TheWhisp said:
I don't know if you're aware of that, but erikcas is working on it since the day psyke83 ported it. He never brags about it. The problem is that Ace/Gio/Mini/Fit uses closed source FSR drivers which don't work on 3.x kernel (yet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it is not necessary to port kernel since Erikcas already is working on it right?
Erikcas has been working on it for months. Galaxy 5 uses older FSR drivers which have open source package or SDK, not sure. The problem is that Mini/Ace/Gio/Fit uses newer version and that open source package is not working.
TheWhisp said:
Erikcas has been working on it for months. Galaxy 5 uses older FSR drivers which have open source package or SDK, not sure. The problem is that Mini/Ace/Gio/Fit uses newer version and that open source package is not working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But if maclawstudio kernel port about Ace / Gio you can use them on our FSR galy mini, right?
Yes
I only leave this here:
bgm92 said:
Just shut up! Maclaw offered us more stable builds than you or other devs ever did! Show a little respect and stop denigrating him because he did a better job than you!
I really hope Maclaw won't release 3.x kernel sources so you won't steal his work and port it to other phones.
__________________________________________________
And one another important thing! How can you tell us he stoke psyke83's work? From where do you know? Have you got any proofs? How can you just speak like that? Again, just shut up - like a romanian proverb says: If you would shut up, you would remained a philosopher...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
News flash bro ....Ever tried erikcas's builds please do if you didn't they are the most stable ones available.
also maclaw can/most likely isnt working on a source port for ace/gio but the truth of the matter is that would be sheer waste of time.Psyke83 already did the work,erikcas and wayland ace ported it to gio and ace respectively(they added their defconfigs and nessary parts) so it would be foolish of maclaw to start from scratch.
Also lets clarify he may/most likely is Kanging erikcas , wayland ace and psyke83 's work but since its open to all to build its not actually stealing(provided he gives credit but thats just good manners).
also the fsr module is a proprietary module(source code is not available) the one that psyke83 is using was leaked via a galaxy5 eclair kernel sources and still contained proprietary blobs(possibly that's the problem area).
Erikcas spent about what 3-4 months 14 hrs a day on the kernel trying all permutations and combinations but was not successful so ....you realize if i show doubt to maclaws possiblity of fixing it(nonetheless miracles happen).
PS reported you.(for starting a possible flame war).
PPS also maclaw still breaks the gpl by distributiing a closed source kernel based on opensourced resources(its still linux).
---------- Post added at 07:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:21 PM ----------
marcin1147 said:
I only leave this here:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
knock knock ....correction Erikcas and psyke83's not TheWhisp.
Dark Passenger said:
Erikcas spent about what 3-4 months 14 hrs a day on the kernel trying all permutations and combinations but was not successful so ....you realize if i show doubt to maclaws possiblity of fixing it(nonetheless miracles happen)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
COOL STORY BRO
*click*
BTW. Maybe you don't know but our sources are here: https://github.com/MaclawStudio/aosp_kernel
Also the fact that maclaw asked for donations to buy a galaxy mini....
many people trusted him and donated..
and when there was enough he betrayed by stopping development and not using the money what it was meant for ...
most people argue that he promised but as always there is no proof or a written agreement or contract and thus the money donated with trust of further development of various development was pocketed...
I am not blaming or accusing anyone of anything but just stating the facts that i know..
hsay said:
Also the fact that maclaw asked for donations to buy a galaxy mini.... many people trusted him and donated..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maclaw told me that nobody has donated.
and you believed?
anyway lets stop the discussion right here...
if maclaw comes back for development i dont have any problems...
he is welcome anytime
Please, stop this stupid arguing.
I know a lot of people hates me here, I don't care.
Just relax, let every developer like erikcas, TheWhisp etc. do their bests without fighting.
Maybe our device sources are closed, but we've to share kernel sources. If we do 3.x kernel, we'll have to share sources aswell.
Erickas will make 3.x? Great, every Samsung device with msm7x27 will be able to use it with mention that it's ported by him.
We will make 3.x? Great, as up. We must to share kernel sources when we release it.
What a difference?
Related
i actually have a very small question. am new to this forum and wish to know if our optimus black has any dedicated developer (like knzo) who is trying to port or make ROMs for the BLACK???....
i had an x10 mini b4 and i sold it to get this cell. now even the x10 mini (with it's paltry specs) has a working ICS build and i have a "cake on my face" feeling
i had a talk with MIUI about the support and they told me that our cell will get support by Q1 2012.
but as said, i was fancying a RAW UNCUSTOMIZED ICS flavor for our black...now, am NOT trying to create a spam thread about ICS or a hate thread about LG...
i just wanted to know whether any dev is working with our device??
P.S. - please don't kill me for asking this question.
i asked the admin for a dedicated "Q&A" forum, but nobody backed my request
waiting for your replies
Ricardo is our CM9 dev for LG devices.
this is his google plus:https://plus.google.com/115049428938715274412/posts
I dont think we have a dev for ICS ROM in XDA....
But aprold and knzo should be continuing Nova kernel from CM7 to CM9. so we just have to wait for Ricardo to finish his job!(i think still have some bugs left and camera not working)
EDIT: i think the only working ROMs we have are knzo's Nova ROM and Pay's ROM....and for kernel is Quasar kernel done by knzo and currently what i am using now CM7 #20 with knzo's Nova kernel for CM7(but the current dev has been transferred to aprold both of them are working together!) LG devices are kinda cold(i donnoe about LG O2X though pretty popular) so its not surprising to see that we have not much devs. LG peeps have been telling us that we will have our hands on official GB by November this year but i think none of us have the official GB on our phone yet(they fail in promises) that's why we are using CM7(GB) and waiting for CM9(ICS)
CalamitySir said:
Ricardo is our CM9 dev for LG devices.
this is his google plus:https://plus.google.com/115049428938715274412/posts
I dont think we have a dev for ICS ROM in XDA....
But aprold and knzo should be continuing Nova kernel from CM7 to CM9. so we just have to wait for Ricardo to finish his job!(i think still have some bugs left and camera not working)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1, rick is the man
Sent from my heart into yours
Well we do have some senior members helping us on a number of occasions ranging from simple theming, modding and giving little guidance every now and when up to getting overclocking kernel , but only exclusive dev working on ics rom is Ricardo.
But hey till we get our basic requirements being helped, i 'm satisfied with that; and who knows any time a new dev could be coming just like aprold with kernel project and temasek with cherrypicked kangs... So, i 'm happy.
You can see my signature, i 've thanked a few of senior members in our forum here; a little gratitude from my side.
agent205 said:
+1, rick is the man
Sent from my heart into yours
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
officialreloaded said:
Well we do have some senior members helping us on a number of occasions ranging from simple theming, modding and giving little guidance every now and when up to getting overclocking kernel , but only exclusive dev working on ics rom is Ricardo.
But hey till we get our basic requirements being helped, i 'm satisfied with that; and who knows any time a new dev could be coming just like aprold with kernel project and temasek with cherrypicked kangs... So, i 'm happy.
You can see my signature, i 've thanked a few of senior members in our forum here; a little gratitude from my side.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes...i have seen his profile in G+, thanks for the lead.
now, for those who want to gain some knowledge about porting or making AOSP ROMs,i have found a nice little tutorial for them...it's very juvenile and lucid. all you need is to run linux on your workstation. as of me, my idiot idiot brother formatted my workstation along with EVERY single DOCUMENT of mine!!!!
and am on an agonizingly slow bandwidth so cannot d/l ubuntu over again along with other necessities. i am uploading the pdf for your reference (if any1 of you are interested, that is)...all you need is ubuntu, VM/cygwin, git/source, patience and time there are loads of other guides if you are actually wanting to port a nice rom(or even thinking of making one)
(now, making a good,flawless,working ROM requires good knowledge about android and developing skills, yet u can give it a try )
once any1 starts the project and get stuck,post the work in DEV section and hopefully some of our knowledgeable senior members can take the lead
happy trying
Hello,
So.. Yeah! MIUI is now open-source. The TeamCooper already has an Alpha released on their FB page. All the news about MIUI opensource : http://androidcommunity.com/chinese-oem-xiaomi-publishes-miui-open-source-code-20120203/ .
Have a nice day!
Now only if some dev starts working on a port for mini
I like MIUI's simplicity. If we get a port I won't be upgrading my phone anytime soon lol!
Nice news Hope someone will make a MIUI for Galaxy Mini
this is good news. hope other developers will make one for our MINI.
too much for cm7 hahahahaha MUI FTW!!!!!!!!
I can't wait.......><
Netas3k said:
Hello,
So.. Yeah! MIUI is now open-source. The TeamCooper already has an Alpha released on their FB page. All the news about MIUI opensource : http://androidcommunity.com/chinese-oem-xiaomi-publishes-miui-open-source-code-20120203/ .
Have a nice day!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well really sorry to say but netas3k you only tell stuff and commit but never do something yourself.
I know it cruel to say but it's truth.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
nishanty13 said:
Well really sorry to say but netas3k you only tell stuff and commit but never do something yourself.
I know it cruel to say but it's truth.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, he said true . Sorry, but this is really true :/.
Sent from my piece of **** using Tapatalk.
Wow... How supportive you guys are.... Still this is fun no matter what you say.... I still research myself. And so you know probably in two days i'm gonna release a guide how to run debian + lxde on our mini without losing android . And btw - most of the guys release just news too.... But you don't say anything to them... Either way what you said got on my mind and i will keep that. But it won't change something major in me
So will be avaible a MIUI rom for our device ?
first of all wrong section
second: developers already know that
3.when squadzone finishes cm9 he will probebly make miui v4 (my opinion cause his awesome xD)
I don't think it's a wrong sections. Since it development related news....
Sent from my GT-S5570 using Tapatalk
Good news guys samsung galaxy ace have finaly port miui 4.0
here u can see!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1504805
gmp009 said:
Good news guys samsung galaxy ace have finaly port miui 4.0
here u can see!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1504805
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ace has armv7
denzel09 said:
ace has armv7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ace have armv6 rev11...
Plus ace is mdpi
Someone correct me,
as said here (in 2nd post) :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1478558&highlight=miui
They just tell u how to port it and it's not the complete source code.
They threw in the source for a few apps...that's all.
Because MIUI is based on CM, we just take CM9, integrate MIUI source (apps, framework) in CM9 source and compile.
mv_style said:
first of all wrong section
second: developers already know that
3.when squadzone finishes cm9 he will probebly make miui v4 (my opinion cause his awesome xD)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better ask him before posting ****.
wow cool
hope it comes fast to our mini
TheWhisp said:
Because MIUI is based on CM, we just take CM9, integrate MIUI source (apps, framework) in CM9 source and compile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct.
Miui guys just took CM and modified it and kept it as closed source for quite a time.
But I think first we needa have stable CM9.
i had a motorola defy with locked bootloader. There were no hope for updates and for custom roms. Till dev (quarx) did it. Now defy has jelly bean (cm10). Lets search for devs and make a donation app, so they can buy our phone add develop one great rom.
Great idea, but do we have enough people? No one will buy the phone if we can donate only ~100€
well, not to develop ROM, but better to sacrifice their/his phone to try unlocking bootloader..
http://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensource-detail.jsp?detailCustomerModelCode=LGP880
we've now source code, i think it'll help us
reas0n said:
well, not to develop ROM, but better to sacrifice their/his phone to try unlocking bootloader..
http://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensource-detail.jsp?detailCustomerModelCode=LGP880
we've now source code, i think it'll help us
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it will...well at least for a custom kernel i think. Still, drivers have to come from Nvidia. And everyone knows about their reputation when it comes providing open source codes and such.
ukramch said:
i had a motorola defy with locked bootloader. There were no hope for updates and for custom roms. Till dev (quarx) did it. Now defy has jelly bean (cm10). Lets search for devs and make a donation app, so they can buy our phone add develop one great rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
incorrect, i made the Sense custom for Defy way before even CM9 was invented, but correct 2nd-init was working already then and no none really spend much investigating how to use it early on, but that was probably 1yr+ ago.
Dexter_nlb said:
incorrect, i made the Sense custom for Defy way before even CM9 was invented, but correct 2nd-init was working already then and no none really spend much investigating how to use it early on, but that was probably 1yr+ ago.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quarx was the first one who figured it out, how to 2nd boot the cm7 rom on defy. maybe he could give some tips for devs in our comminity.
PS: i can remember your rom
hietsu said:
Great idea, but do we have enough people? No one will buy the phone if we can donate only ~100€]
what do you think, how large is our community approximately?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ukramch said:
hietsu said:
Great idea, but do we have enough people? No one will buy the phone if we can donate only ~100€]
what do you think, how large is our community approximately?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We're definitely not that big. I'd say theres no more than 15-20 that uses this phone and that would be interested in develpment advancement
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ukramch said:
Quarx was the first one who figured it out, how to 2nd boot the cm7 rom on defy. maybe he could give some tips for devs in our comminity.
PS: i can remember your rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i did mine in feb.2011 , Quarx did his first post of cm7 in april 2011, i do not know if that helps your memory. (i did check all his post on the topic) . I strongely believe i was utilizing 2ndinit on defy on a customrom, and i was introducing it here on o4x for now.
but to stay on topic, no one seems to have faith in a CM10 for O4X here, i tried to port, but that never went well, and compiling only helps so far as the ril driver is documented by LG here.
but the rest should be straight forward, since we share chipset with OneX which got quite far now.
btw,
i did post my CM10 rom as nandroid backup using 2nd init , so your request is already existing on o4x, just not with a phone functionality.
Dexter_nlb said:
i did mine in feb.2011 , Quarx did his first post of cm7 in april 2011, i do not know if that helps your memory. (i did check all his post on the topic) . I strongely believe i was utilizing 2ndinit on defy on a customrom, and i was introducing it here on o4x for now.
but to stay on topic, no one seems to have faith in a CM10 for O4X here, i tried to port, but that never went well, and compiling only helps so far as the ril driver is documented by LG here.
but the rest should be straight forward, since we share chipset with OneX which got quite far now.
btw,
i did post my CM10 rom as nandroid backup using 2nd init , so your request is already existing on o4x, just not with a phone functionality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, i had my defy since may 2011. then you are right. at the beginning there were also phone functionality problems, we shouldn't loose faith
babymatteo said:
Yes it will...well at least for a custom kernel i think. Still, drivers have to come from Nvidia. And everyone knows about their reputation when it comes providing open source codes and such.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have downloaded the file and it is .zip file .. It has two files that are kernel and platform files >> Good news
Now, I can see all the files for our O4X and everything is clear . We can make modification for it and install it by CWM
I hope you guys all the best with development . The kernel file has the drivers for our O4X
Best regards,
---------- Post added at 11:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:05 AM ----------
Please, look at the information of tegra 3 and open your eyes as much as you can at the official website
http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/tegra-3-uk.html
Maybe you need it sooner or later ..
Best regards,
IMHO
As long as the kernel is not signed u cant really use it. i dont remember anyone using 2nd init on milestone for a custom kernel.
they actually just adapted CM for the old kernels wich is a lot of work i think... And that could be done for our 4xHD as well the problem is
actually that u need the devs for it.
And i think no dev really wants 2 work on a standart phone unless he has it and really wants to keep it and mod on it.
As we knows guys,our device not getting firmware update from official,and we cant get stable firm/OS/ROM till now
Just inform to you all,,
All we need is new KERNEL for step up on developments,not new ROM or anything else
Even we get new lib,new bin for ROM,we will alwats get stuck without new KERNEL
Sorry I just say,cant doing anything
But I suggest to all,think about port/backport KERNEL,not port ROM
For me,its very useless if we always think for new ROM without new KERNEL
so,this topic minds is
ALL WE NEED FOR MOVE OUT AND STEP UP IS "NEW KERNEL" VERSION
Thanks,
Please read the title,I dont have mind to offense anyone
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
How, will, when, what will this update come from?
Sent from my A99 using xda app-developers app
I've tried so many times to port our kernel to higher version but always failed.. now I'm little bit busy with my job and preparing to get a college to continue my study.. for now,, i just developing android if i really have a free time.. and i will share if i succeed to port our kernel..
thanks for all support..
No spill overs from PA or AOPK?
Sent from my A99 using xda app-developers app
Tj_style was told me about kernel,,its very hard to port/backport kernel,so surely make new kernel is excellently hard
He said, our device is far from standard google architecture
Last time ago,,he planning to release Andro-id v3.3 RC4 with new baseband and kernel 2.6.35.14, unfortunately,his device getting brick and his development didn't complete yet,,new kernel still give issue on WiFi and GPS
Maybe we really need talk and ask help for hard kernel modder for this
As aben said,he also busy at this time and will help when he have free time
We can't step up if still on this
We need help from kernel modder/kernel devs
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
We have to reconsider the bounty initiated by our good friend naynesh.
Happy Holidays everyone.
^_^
aeoi said:
We have to reconsider the bounty initiated by our good friend naynesh.
Happy Holidays everyone.
^_^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats it
Sorry for donating,,I cant donate as you know Indonesian people minority does have Credit Card
So we must try ask for real dev for developing our device
Where is naynesh??I never meet him in this forum since he announce bounty will refund
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
why not to just optimize current kernel with stable gingerbread rom?
want ics/jb features?
one of my friend's highly customized cm7 rom has it, not all, but most cool features. and ton of customization available. why not try it?
port it or build it from source.
ardX said:
why not to just optimize current kernel with stable gingerbread rom?
want ics/jb features?
one of my friend's highly customized cm7 rom has it, not all, but most cool features. and ton of customization available. why not try it?
port it or build it from source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats kind ROM?
What about CyanMobile X?
Om,simple things is,,our 2.6.35.7 is far from stable,,CM7 with .35 doesnt have fully working default camera,,simple thing,but very important,and what about the others?WiFi SoD?ICV OCV?
Thats what I mean and force me downgrade my Mia to .32
About backport kernel fro 3.x.x or make new kernel,,how about your opinion om ardx?
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Arya_3RDNumber said:
Whats kind ROM?
What about CyanMobile X?
Om,simple things is,,our 2.6.35.7 is far from stable,,CM7 with .35 doesnt have fully working default camera,,simple thing,but very important,and what about the others?WiFi SoD?ICV OCV?
Thats what I mean and force me downgrade my Mia to .32
About backport kernel fro 3.x.x or make new kernel,,how about your opinion om ardx?
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whatever, just try to develop it yourself, truth is, that fix was available in various commit on various github that develop this device or other
about backport, check other Recognized Developer that try it at other device, are they suceeded, yet? so...
Arya_3RDNumber said:
Tj_style was told me about kernel,,its very hard to port/backport kernel,so surely make new kernel is excellently hard
He said, our device is far from standard google architecture
Last time ago,,he planning to release Andro-id v3.3 RC4 with new baseband and kernel 2.6.35.14, unfortunately,his device getting brick and his development didn't complete yet,,new kernel still give issue on WiFi and GPS
Maybe we really need talk and ask help for hard kernel modder for this
As aben said,he also busy at this time and will help when he have free time
We can't step up if still on this
We need help from kernel modder/kernel devs
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If some one can request Tj style to provide his kernel source to aben or CK and they can try to work out issues.
Bcoz 2.6.35.14 will help us to have many more roms for our device.
I tried few roms to port but failed due to kernel
Aben
Can you take lead on this to provide us stable 2.6.35.14 kernel . we can also try same kernel with wifi and GPS issue.Tj style has shared his source on github
you need to just build it
Requesting you to please help and build 1 version of 35.14 kernel for all of us
Arya
Can you request TJ STYLE to provide his kernel
EDIT : I am trying to port Cyanmobile from sometime but failed to boot it up also tried AURORA ICS on .35 kernel booting but getting into bootloop don't know what to do
If I not wrong,,Cyanmobile X is GB 2.3.8
Dont know what is mean with "2.3.8" as we know higher version GB is 2.3.7
Maybe,thats which make it cant boot
I was request TJ from some days ago,but he dont reply my PM till now,,I dont know why,,maybe you can also PM him
35.14 can take backport kernel 3.x.x architecture
I also saw kernel 2.6.66.7 on galaxy ace 4.2.1 alpha
Seriously,we totally need new kernel for continue ROM projects
My suggest,,try to build Cyanmobile X friends
I think,you need build new source for Cyanmobile,it cant boot if just porting
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
You got the point ArdX... I was tried with 3.0.xx months ago, but damn it's tooo many to change, it will took much time which I didn't have, so I dropped the project. I was thinking to modified .32 to make it faster, but l still like .35. May be later.
By the way, Vigo has .35 kernel officially. Any one has the source?
Sent from my bike using Tapatalk 2
CacingKalung said:
You got the point ArdX... I was tried with 3.0.xx months ago, but damn it's tooo many to change, it will took much time which I didn't have, so I dropped the project. I was thinking to modified .32 to make it faster, but l still like .35. May be later.
By the way, Vigo has .35 kernel officially. Any one has the source?
Sent from my bike using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup that's right.. I've did that too.. so many changes on kernel 3.x.x.. even sometimes my computer getting Hank if I want to see the different between our kernel and 3.x.x,,
I still try it sometimes in my free time..
Btw nice to see you again on CK.. :thumbup:
Arya_3RDNumber said:
Thats it
Sorry for donating,,I cant donate as you know Indonesian people minority does have Credit Card
So we must try ask for real dev for developing our device
Where is naynesh??I never meet him in this forum since he announce bounty will refund
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Friends I am here only, but remaining silent. Unfortunately while i was touring Delhi my dear MI 410 got broken and now i am stuck with galaxy ace s5830.
I think it is too late now. If we were able to raise the sum in time then randomblame would surely have helped us, he is a very good developer. Besides him i had asked to dzo, doomlord, lord clockan they also said that they are busy.
If you are still interested in the bounty idea, then i suggest you contact some developer (May be edowar) and ask him for help. As i have already informed that randomblame had turned down the proposal and tj_style did not reply, it is upto someone from you who has to take a lead. I can transfer the entire bounty amount to any senior member. Please advice before i start refunding by the next month for sure.
PS Thanks to everyone of this board particularly the devs/porters/modders/testers. I owe you more than what i can put in words.
abenagiel said:
Yup that's right.. I've did that too.. so many changes on kernel 3.x.x.. even sometimes my computer getting Hank if I want to see the different between our kernel and 3.x.x,,
I still try it sometimes in my free time..
Btw nice to see you again on CK.. :thumbup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Aben. I don't know, may be next week am going to dissapear again due to entering busy mode again.
Sent from my bike using Tapatalk 2
hi CK n aben. yeah, you have no life if doing that. lol
btw, can you two put your kernel source to the github? and device config maybe, GB based will be better. just want to try build cyanmobile. but cant test myself, so stable config+kernel can help me to fixing bug without device. hehe
@nayneshdev so,,are planning to repair your Mi-410?
Honestly,I dont have any idea for that,,since all devs get busy like CK,ardx,aben,and TJ
Also our friends like elol,zuk,and many,sory if I forget them dissapear from this forum
What about anyone guys?about this bounty
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Arya_3RDNumber said:
@nayneshdev so,,are planning to repair your Mi-410?
Honestly,I dont have any idea for that,,since all devs get busy like CK,ardx,aben,and TJ
Also our friends like elol,zuk,and many,sory if I forget them dissapear from this forum
What about anyone guys?about this bounty
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is a damage beyond repair, screen crushed, board broken into pieces even the sim crushed, a construction truck ran over it, i don't know how it got damaged that bad, previously it was touch enough to withstand many falls, must have been a very bad position.
Personally i think devs should concentrate on fixing the issues with the present kernel and tj_style for sure can fix the camera issue. So it would be better if someone asks to tj_style whether he is willing to do development if we provide him a device.
Hi ardx /aben/ CK
Tj style has shared his kernel 2.6.35.14 source on GIT Hub.
Can you guys built it for our device
Thanks in advance
Hey Guys
Some Time I have created a vote for official cm for our device bcm21553
So Please Can All Of You support our vote to Be heared I think They will respond to Us Hopefully want to share The Link To Vote Here
forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/89978-cm-91010110211stable-for-bcm21553-devices/
myaservip said:
Hey Guys
Some Time I have created a vote for official cm for our device bcm21553
So Please Can All Of You support our vote to Be heared I think They will respond to Us Hopefully want to share The Link To Vote Here
forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/89978-cm-91010110211stable-for-bcm21553-devices/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Had they wanted to create any official CM for us, it would already have been created. Our best hopes are placed on Bieltv.3's work.
btw, wrong section.
EDIT:
Oh, i said some **** here. CM couldn't have been developed by them because they (and us) didn't have the necessary drivers. Now it could be developed by them. But i don't see what could get their interests yet on this phone.
myaservip said:
Hey Guys
Some Time I have created a vote for official cm for our device bcm21553
So Please Can All Of You support our vote to Be heared I think They will respond to Us Hopefully want to share The Link To Vote Here
forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/89978-cm-91010110211stable-for-bcm21553-devices/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Request it at Mods to move this thread into General section.
EDIT: Oh yes, we don't get an official port CM. I think we will get unofficial only because we don't have properly true update for our phone. Bieltv.3 and SpaceCaker will do the hard working for port and they willing it supposed to do as monthly build. Due to initial driver, bieltv.3, SpaceCaker and BroadcomCM Team will not port CM higher than 4.0.4 because we don't get driver higher than ICS. We could having driver which support for ICS only. And I sure Broadcom will build new driver as soon as possible.
Please move [email protected]
Is Pressing Thanks Harder Than Writhing T-H-A-N-K!! So If U Like Press It
:thumbup:
Sent from my GT-S5830i using Tapatalk 2