Database Develop

Galaxy s

I want to buy a new phone, and just want to ask it worth to buy galaxy s or should i go for another phone??

lopman said:
I want to buy a new phone, and just want to ask it worth to buy galaxy s or should i go for another phone??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That kind of depends on what you're looking for in a phone. I have a Galaxy S, and I'm very happy with it. However, it's now been replaced by the "Galaxy SII", which is probably considered "nicer" by most people (slightly better screen, faster dual-core CPU, etc, etc). The SII will be more expensive, so that may be a factor for you.
If you want a phone that just works, can play .mp3 files and games, and has good screen and memory as standard, then the Galaxy S will do all that and more.

Thanks for your reply.... i was more interested in is it a good phone to root and does it have many stable costum roms

lopman said:
Thanks for your reply.... i was more interested in is it a good phone to root and does it have many stable costum roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes; very easy to root; has a wide choice of custom roms; is "officially" supported by CM7; and the community is working very hard to port ICS to this phone. Also very hard to "permanently" break from a custom-rom point of view - "download mode" means almost any other problem is fixable.

I got one more question before i buy it..... which one is best galaxy s plus or galaxy s

There are a lot more ROMs out there for the SGS compared to the SGS+, although some/most (not sure about this...) will work on both phones..
I don't have any experience with the SGS+, but if you're looking for ease of rooting and ROM choice, I'd go for the standard SGS

NielsGoetschalckx said:
There are a lot more ROMs out there for the SGS compared to the SGS+, although some/most (not sure about this...) will work on both phones..
I don't have any experience with the SGS+, but if you're looking for ease of rooting and ROM choice, I'd go for the standard SGS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats true. So i would also say I9000.

galaxy s
I have an option to buy my friends galaxy s which is used for a year in good condition. The i9000 is discontinued in india for some reason, and worse phones like the galaxy s plus and lcd are introduced. I just wanna know if its worth buying the galaxy s now or should i wait for the galaxy s advance so i'm more upto date on the technology? Personally i feel the i9000 was a phone ahead of its time when it was released it still can beat any 2011 single core 1ghz phone and the sgx540 is used in the galaxy nexus too so it must be a pretty good gpu. I just need your opinion on this. Thanks

Both S and S+ are great phones.
If you prefer lots of custom roms then you can go on SGS, but if you like faster cpu (can be overclocked at 2 ghz) and stronger battery life like me, then SGS+ is obvious choice at similar price range.

But don't you think if we use the sgs+ battery in the sgs and overclock it to 1.4ghz,the hummingbird would perform better than a scorpion running at 2ghz? I'm talking about overall performance which is including the processor and gpu.

Am not sure about that.
Adreno 205 is very good gpu used also in Xperia Play for example.
Together with 2ghz processor is still better solution for me.
I found this comparision test between two gpus:
http://www.grandmax.net/2010/10/adreno-205-vs-powervr-sgx540-mobile-gpu.html

Thats an old comparison between android 2.1 and 2.2 obviously there will be a big difference, according to the latest benchmarks the gpu's rank as mali400-adreno220-sgx540-geforce-adreno205.

Can you provide a link with those latest benchmarks, i like to read it.
Thanks.

spectrum011 said:
Can you provide a link with those latest benchmarks, i like to read it.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1050968

After reading this thread my conclusion and answer to your original question remained the same.
These two phones are very similar to the overall strength and the only difference is in relation to the CPU/GPU.
However i9000 is discontinued and is more logical for me, to purchase a new model as his closest successor.

My feeling is the galaxy s if you are after adding custom roms to your phone. The community is massive. Personally I don't think the other phone will compare. Remember the S2 has actually replaced the galaxy s. I say this as the S was samsungs frontline phone at the time. All others are rehashed s phones aimed at a different market segment. If you are going to get a new phone i would go for the s2 or possible wait for s3. If you need it now i would get s
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda premium

Yea i think i'll go for the S itself, S2 is way too expensive, the price hasn't fallen since its launch a year back nd besides i'm gettin the s for 1/3 the price of the s2 . But any idea how much will the s advance cost? If its somewhere close to she s2 itself then there's no use of waiting for it.

NielsGoetschalckx said:
There are a lot more ROMs out there for the SGS compared to the SGS+, although some/most (not sure about this...) will work on both phones..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bcoz of such lack of education many people hard bricked their S+ , no roms from s work on s+ , it's a totally different hardware, bootloader partitions etc..
As for those who commented the gpu, according to all benchmarks there is no big difference between adreno 205 (with updated drivers) and sgx.
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium

[Q] Ice Cream Sandwich Should be available for SGA

Please don't consider it as a "another ICS blah blah... thread"
Just check this product from HTC:
http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_desire_c-4759.php
Processor: 600
Resolution: 320 x 480 pixels
So Our SGA is way better than this phone by HTC. The most interesting feature for this phone is "OS Android OS, v4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)"
On Xda, some days before I read a thread where expert developer confidently said that "Ice Cream Sandwich requires more processing frequency than that of SGA which is 800 and even it can not run on overclocking. So guys just forget about ICS on SGA."
So now what you guys wanna say?? If this HTC handset can RUN official ICS on 600 then why not our SGA??
Your clarification will help all of us!!
Regards,
Adwait

This has been said and discussed a lot of times here TBH.
regardless of whatever someone says our ACE is capable of running ICS but samsung SIMPLY REFUSE to support their older devices and so the fact of the matter is we will NOT GET OFFICIAL ICS. CM9 and AOKP is our best bet.

but can't we use the ICS of this HTC handset to port for our SGA?? CM9 is really a good option but it's modification! I mean to say stock 4.0 for SGA

That device uses cortex A8(armv7) processor,+512 mb ram.And ace has 278 user available ram+armv6 processor.Stock ICS needs 384 mb user available ram to correctly use/render API level 14 of 4.0.CM9 by galaxyics uses binary patches and kernel hacks if you see their sources.Therefore the performance boost ICS gives,is not visible because API level 14 neccessities are not met.Moreover i consider CM9 for ace just eyecandy(thats personal opinion).And I am pretty satisfied by gingerbread.Android 4 for ace would have made sense if it had 500+mb ram and 1ghz+ armv7 processor.What use is an OS if it reduces performance of your device

side_effect said:
That device uses cortex A8(armv7) processor,+512 mb ram.And ace has 278 user available ram+armv6 processor.Stock ICS needs 384 mb user available ram to correctly use/render API level 14 of 4.0.CM9 by galaxyics uses binary patches and kernel hacks if you see their sources.Therefore the performance boost ICS gives,is not visible because API level 14 neccessities are not met.Moreover i consider CM9 for ace just eyecandy(thats personal opinion).And I am pretty satisfied by gingerbread.Android 4 for ace would have made sense if it had 500+mb ram and 1ghz+ armv7 processor.What use is an OS if it reduces performance of your device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh gr8!! Now this reply satisfied my question!! Thanks a ton!!

side_effect said:
That device uses cortex A8(armv7) processor,+512 mb ram.And ace has 278 user available ram+armv6 processor.Stock ICS needs 384 mb user available ram to correctly use/render API level 14 of 4.0.CM9 by galaxyics uses binary patches and kernel hacks if you see their sources.Therefore the performance boost ICS gives,is not visible because API level 14 neccessities are not met.Moreover i consider CM9 for ace just eyecandy(thats personal opinion).And I am pretty satisfied by gingerbread.Android 4 for ace would have made sense if it had 500+mb ram and 1ghz+ armv7 processor.What use is an OS if it reduces performance of your device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This....Its not just the processing power that decides the performances.armv6 is pretty extinct now,no more support.
Sent from my fingers to your face,take it or leave it.

according to samsung even galaxy s is not capable so
dont buy samsung mid range from next time thats only solution

Prawesome said:
This....Its not just the processing power that decides the performances.armv6 is pretty extinct now,no more support.
Sent from my fingers to your face,take it or leave it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung devs and others are forget the armv6 devices they carrier into armv7. for me armv6 are same good as armv7 you right they not support the armv6 now its like a garbage.. zzz

+1 Never buy a mid and low range Samsung device. Go for Sony.
This was sent from my Galaxy Ace, but who cares?

nims11 said:
according to samsung even galaxy s is not capable so
dont buy samsung mid range from next time thats only solution
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah..they stated Device dont have enough ram to support tw4

side_effect said:
yeah..they stated Device dont have enough ram to support tw4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but galaxy s already have port of s2 tw4 ics rom

Well its ol bull**** coz i have SGfit and running cm9 successfully its really smooth i use it fr daily use.....
Sent from my GT-S5670 using XDA

Thnkz to mclaw
Sent from my GT-S5670 using XDA

maxcool12345 said:
Well its ol bull**** coz i have SGfit and running cm9 successfully its really smooth i use it fr daily use.....
Sent from my GT-S5670 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
camera works?
maxcool12345 said:
Thnkz to mclaw
Sent from my GT-S5670 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

nims11 said:
but galaxy s already have port of s2 tw4 ics rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XDA rulez..!!BTW you did paranoid android?

side_effect said:
XDA rulez..!!BTW you did paranoid android?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep but its not good for our small screen

Aww sad..

side_effect said:
Aww sad..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sad if you have not problem with small layout then no problem as due to small screen in tablet mode stuff looks small so if you have problem you can choose phone ui then all stuff will be same as cm9

nims11 said:
not sad if you have not problem with small layout then no problem as due to small screen in tablet mode stuff looks small so if you have problem you can choose phone ui then all stuff will be same as cm9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
any plans to release it?may with a suitable dpi we can adjust it little bit

side_effect said:
any plans to release it?may with a suitable dpi we can adjust it little bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if all want then will realese after beta9

stable fast rom for galaxys I900

Hi There,
lets try find the most suitable rom galaxys, after all we have a decent device, nothing more then
this, and all the developers somehow manage, to upgrade it endlessly but still the device does not
respond that quick
so does someone has an idea, how to find the most suitable rom for galaxy s, for daily use
lots of internet,
messaging
social apps
GPS
stable
and quick responses
it can be any version 2.3.7>4.0>4.1>4.2 with any kernel, with/without overclocking
for now i use SlimBean 4.2.1 with semaphore. live OC 105% and the device is stable but a little bit lagy...
notice that i am fully aware that there is no "best rom" but lets try to find the most suitable one for daily use...
Thanks

Wrong Forum mate!! Should be in the Q&A forum....
My Personal Choice is Slim Bean v1.0 Official

AW: stable fast rom for galaxys I900
biggary said:
Wrong Forum mate!! Should be in the Q&A forum....
My Personal Choice is Slim Bean v1.0 Official
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should be nowhere - it's a 'best ROM' thread.

dark_knight35 said:
Should be nowhere - it's a 'best ROM' thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i specifically stated, it is not a question for the best rom,
its a question about how can we find the software that
works perfectly with the hardware we have in our "decent" device
for example the 4.2.1 was developed for a quad core 1.5GHZ, 2GB ram etc...
while we have a single core 1Ghz 512Mb ram...
of course the developers are doing magnificent adaptation and somehow manage the device to work good
but lets face its a little too much for this gardware...
i am looking for good advises how to find a suitable rom that will work smooth...

k9nadav said:
i specifically stated, it is not a question for the best rom,
its a question about how can we find the software that
works perfectly with the hardware we have in our "decent" device
for example the 4.2.1 was developed for a quad core 1.5GHZ, 2GB ram etc...
while we have a single core 1Ghz 512Mb ram...
of course the developers are doing magnificent adaptation and somehow manage the device to work good
but lets face its a little too much for this gardware...
i am looking for good advises how to find a suitable rom that will work smooth...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:banghead:
Flash stock GB JW9 from Samsung and be done with it! that one is specifically made for the GT-I9000 hardware and not your girlfriends vibrator
Useless thread and wrong section. It seems you don't get it what CM is all about, the work maintainers do,...
Flash stock GB and be happy
Sent from the legendary GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

Answer is stock cyanogenmod with semaphore or devil kernel or hellybean. But questions is still dumb.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

k9nadav said:
i specifically stated, it is not a question for the best rom,
its a question about how can we find the software that
works perfectly with the hardware we have in our "decent" device
for example the 4.2.1 was developed for a quad core 1.5GHZ, 2GB ram etc...
while we have a single core 1Ghz 512Mb ram...
of course the developers are doing magnificent adaptation and somehow manage the device to work good
but lets face its a little too much for this gardware...
i am looking for good advises how to find a suitable rom that will work smooth...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sgs have single core ???
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2

trut said:
Sgs have single core ???
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but faster than most of dual cores with 512mb ram like optimus 2x and other tegra devices from what I see.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

burakgon said:
Yes but faster than most of dual cores with 512mb ram like optimus 2x and other tegra devices from what I see.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats more because of the awesome dev support than raw power , although yeah , the tegra 2 chipset sucks big time , my Galaxy Tab 10.1 is so slow (on stock ROM , and it is even slower on CM10.1).
Also point to note that our devices performs much better(not in Raw benchmarks,but in real life performance) than the Novathor running Xperia U/P/Sola etc , which lag like anything with ICS+.
And with the latest 4.2.2 and new kernels , RAM performance has increased over 40% and CPU Floating Point went about +30%.

Thread Closed, best ROM threads aren't allowed. Everyone has their own preference. I suggest you install a few, look at features and see what is best for you.

[Q] Samsung galaxy s advance vs. Samsung galaxy s III mini

Hi.
I'll buy new phone but I need help... Which is better?? Exactly, I mean this:
Camera
Performance
SGSadvance has Auto-brightness and SGSIIImini no. So Which is better?
Thanks for the replies

First of all. SGSA WILL get 4.2.2, secondly, the S3 Mini is just so small. I recommend the Galaxy S Advance
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium

I think S3 Mini is better! Below is a list of things that S3 Mini has but (sadly) S Advance doesn't...
- It has NFC Support.. although a variant of SGSA, the i9070P has NFC - BUT there is (almost) no "developments" for i9070P, so its not recommended for people who would want to try out Custom ROMs or Kernels...
- It has Bluetooth 4.0
- It has MORE RAM than SGSA (1024 MB vs 768 MB)
- Faster Internet/Data Speed (HSPA @ 14 mbps)
- I think it also has 4G support (HSPA+)
- It has support for microSDHC
- It does have Additional Display Support
- Its "technically" newer in market, so there is a chance that this phone might get a taste of Key Lime Pie update...
- Other Misc things.....
So yeah, Performance would surely be better in S3 mini, but both phones have the "same average" Camera or Video Recording/Playback quality....
But I'd still prefer S Advance because I hate that "curvy" shape of S3(mini).. whereas SGSA or S2 or S2 Plus has a much more BOLD shape which I prefer to hold

S Advance is a good budget phone... no doubt. But stop misdirecting the guy by telling him the S Advance is better than the S3 Mini...
With the S3 Mini you get... More RAM, stable version of JB, better camera (we're not talking megapixels here), better looks, more ROM support ( they have an almost stable CM10 ).. It's just a better phone.

panda00 said:
S Advance is a good budget phone... no doubt. But stop misdirecting the guy by telling him the S Advance is better than the S3 Mini...
With the S3 Mini you get... More RAM, stable version of JB, better camera (we're not talking megapixels here), better looks, more ROM support ( they have an almost stable CM10 ).. It's just a better phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to me it's better. I just don't like the S3 and the S3 mini. The design is ugly as hell....
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 06:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:34 AM ----------
Sami Kabir said:
I think S3 Mini is better! Below is a list of things that S3 Mini has but (sadly) S Advance doesn't...
- It has NFC Support.. although a variant of SGSA, the i9070P has NFC - BUT there is (almost) no "developments" for i9070P, so its not recommended for people who would want to try out Custom ROMs or Kernels...
- It has Bluetooth 4.0
- It has MORE RAM than SGSA (1024 MB vs 768 MB)
- Faster Internet/Data Speed (HSPA @ 14 mbps)
- I think it also has 4G support (HSPA+)
- It has support for microSDHC
- It does have Additional Display Support
- Its "technically" newer in market, so there is a chance that this phone might get a taste of Key Lime Pie update...
- Other Misc things.....
So yeah, Performance would surely be better in S3 mini, but both phones have the "same average" Camera or Video Recording/Playback quality....
But I'd still prefer S Advance because I hate that "curvy" shape of S3(mini).. whereas SGSA or S2 or S2 Plus has a much more BOLD shape which I prefer to hold
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope no 4G support just yet.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium

Jeroenvk94 said:
First of all. SGSA WILL get 4.2.2, secondly, the S3 Mini is just so small. I recommend the Galaxy S Advance
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Now, I see it sorry SGSadvance will get android 4.2.2.
Sami Kabir said:
I think S3 Mini is better! Below is a list of things that S3 Mini has but (sadly) S Advance doesn't...
- It has NFC Support.. although a variant of SGSA, the i9070P has NFC - BUT there is (almost) no "developments" for i9070P, so its not recommended for people who would want to try out Custom ROMs or Kernels...
- It has Bluetooth 4.0
- It has MORE RAM than SGSA (1024 MB vs 768 MB)
- Faster Internet/Data Speed (HSPA @ 14 mbps)
- I think it also has 4G support (HSPA+)
- It has support for microSDHC
- It does have Additional Display Support
- Its "technically" newer in market, so there is a chance that this phone might get a taste of Key Lime Pie update...
- Other Misc things.....
So yeah, Performance would surely be better in S3 mini, but both phones have the "same average" Camera or Video Recording/Playback quality....
But I'd still prefer S Advance because I hate that "curvy" shape of S3(mini).. whereas SGSA or S2 or S2 Plus has a much more BOLD shape which I prefer to hold
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
panda00 said:
S Advance is a good budget phone... no doubt. But stop misdirecting the guy by telling him the S Advance is better than the S3 Mini...
With the S3 Mini you get... More RAM, stable version of JB, better camera (we're not talking megapixels here), better looks, more ROM support ( they have an almost stable CM10 ).. It's just a better phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. So I think that SGSIIImini is better. But about android 5.0 I think that SGSIIImini won't get official update.

Sami Kabir said:
I think S3 Mini is better! Below is a list of things that S3 Mini has but (sadly) S Advance doesn't...
- It has NFC Support.. although a variant of SGSA, the i9070P has NFC - BUT there is (almost) no "developments" for i9070P, so its not recommended for people who would want to try out Custom ROMs or Kernels...-true
- It has Bluetooth 4.0-true,but not very useful
- It has MORE RAM than SGSA (1024 MB vs 768 MB)-true
- Faster Internet/Data Speed (HSPA @ 14 mbps)-SGSA has the same speed
- I think it also has 4G support (HSPA+)-no,it hasn't
- It has support for microSDHC-somebody tested micro SDXC onSGSA and it worked
- It does have Additional Display Support
- Its "technically" newer in market, so there is a chance that this phone might get a taste of Key Lime Pie update...-it will stop as s2 as ours to 4.2.2...
- Other Misc things.....
So yeah, Performance would surely be better in S3 mini, but both phones have the "same average" Camera or Video Recording/Playback quality....
But I'd still prefer S Advance because I hate that "curvy" shape of S3(mini).. whereas SGSA or S2 or S2 Plus has a much more BOLD shape which I prefer to hold
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also,for camera,S3 mini has only a vga front camera.
The only real advantage of s3 mini is the more ram which I would trade it with the ambient light sensor if you ask me...

ionescugeo9942 said:
Also,for camera,S3 mini has only a vga front camera.
The only real advantage of s3 mini is the more ram which I would trade it with the ambient light sensor if you ask me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, the most important part is the ram (for multi-tasking) ambient light sensor is not that important to me.if your buying it but it does not have ''big diff'' with s advance because it has NovaThor processor too.

But you might want to look up the S2 Plus or LG Optimus L9 (great development for this device available)... I just bought an S2 Plus and got to say that it's great bang for buck as the price of the S2 Plus was just 50 bucks more than an S Advance, and the difference in features and performance is really wide.

[Q] My Next Buy ?

I want to buy one of this phones Galaxy S1 vs Galaxy Ace 2 vs Optimus 2x.
How is the battery for 2x it is bad, because S1 has 1 core and the same battery ?? I saw on ace 2 and s1 on youtube it is running games like nfs and nova3. Can this LG run them ??

AndyTimE said:
I want to buy one of this phones Galaxy S1 vs Galaxy Ace 2 vs Optimus 2x.
How is the battery for 2x it is bad, because S1 has 1 core and the same battery ?? I saw on ace 2 and s1 on youtube it is running games like nfs and nova3. Can this LG run them ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would prefer the 2x over the other samsung phones.
I have played the nfs and works fine with custom kernel, great developers, unbrickable device and amazing community.
Press the Thanks button instead of saying it!!

kekks said:
I would prefer the 2x over the other samsung phones.
I have played the nfs and works fine with custom kernel, great developers, unbrickable device and amazing community.
Press the Thanks button instead of saying it!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How it can be unbrickable ?? In the time when I install the rom and take battery out wouldn the phone be bricked ??

AndyTimE said:
How it can be unbrickable ?? In the time when I install the rom and take battery out wouldn the phone be bricked ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The stock rom can be flashed without the battery.
The phone can be bricked but also recoverable, thats the reason why its known as unbrickable device.
And how to recover the phone, for that you need to search
Press the Thanks button instead of saying it!!

kekks said:
The stock rom can be flashed without the battery.
The phone can be bricked but also recoverable, thats the reason why its known as unbrickable device.
And how to recover the phone, for that you need to search
Press the Thanks button instead of saying it!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How's the battery ?? But the display compared to a Super Amoled?

AndyTimE said:
How's the battery ?? But the display compared to a Super Amoled?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please google/search in xda.
Press the Thanks button instead of saying it!!

kekks said:
Please google/search in xda.
Press the Thanks button instead of saying it!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanted to hear it from a daily user .....

AndyTimE said:
How it can be unbrickable ?? In the time when I install the rom and take battery out wouldn the phone be bricked ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unbrickable doesn't mean it's impossible to brick the phone, it just means it's impossible to permanently brick it. Meaning that if you screw up a flash and the phone doesn't boot, it's very easy to restore it to working condition.

O2X is quite better than s1 and ace
Simply take a look into the specs.There is also a great developing community that makes your phone working faster as the speedlight,hehehe
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

skyjackno1 said:
O2X is quite better than s1 and ace
Simply take a look into the specs.There is also a great developing community that makes your phone working faster as the speedlight,hehehe
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
O2X has more raw power and a better camera, no doubt about that, but the S1 has better stability from official CM10/10.1 nightlies due to better drivers. There's only so much our best devs can do for the O2X when a lot of things from Nvidia are closed source.

the display is much better on O2X, every game runs on it well, the battery is alright.
oh and it looks better than both samsung's

Next buy would be the LG optimus G.
No samsung for me,because you have to buy a new battery after 6 months.....

Advantages of O2X:
Better display ( i think that amoled displays show a bit strange colors)
Better Processor - yes Nvidia is closed source but the GPU in Tegra2 is better even compared with Samsung GS2 and if you want gaming console O2X is a better choice obviously
Better look - i dont like plastic samsungs
Advantages of samsung S1 and Ace 2
Better source - better ROMs for them
Ace 2 has more RAM
And that's it i cant think of more.
Battery life in O2X is bad .. but with good ROM you can use it for a day or two

my opion i have the lg o2x and my friend has a galaxy s1 and yeah galaxy s1 is cool but slow and even with a rom, i instaled a gaming rom, very clean it runs okay, but you instal 5apps its slower and slower, battery is okay, but yeah 1core vs 2cores
the o2x had 8mp dualcore, i had like 10+ games on its was on cm7 runed great, no lags like the s1, battery on 2g i had 1day, but i texte hole day and texting eats batery, but internet on wifi great, 3g eat battery but is acptable. so good phone and it is cheap
but if you text a lot the s1 is good with black sms back ground you can text hole day, and on 3g is does alright with good rom, but yeah if you want apps dont take the s1, it not so fast
then the ace 2, 3.8"' screen and 800mhz dualcore, i guess battery is also good like the most sammy phones, but yeah you get 5mp like the s1
and littler screen.
just say what you want to do with phone.
games and lots of apps O2X and internet browsing is so smooth. sms the S1 internet is okay but slow, due the 1ghz singlz core.
ace 2 dont know is okay but cant beat the o2x

i would like to buy an optimus 4x or htc one x, i dont which is better, but the o4x is cheaper
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda premium

Regash said:
i would like to buy an optimus 4x or htc one x, i dont which is better, but the o4x is cheaper
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go for one X
realy good xda suport, my onlce has it, its great, battery also great, for the little battery, o4x is not bad but xda suport not much, and from LG also not for drivers, but the then other side o4x has SD and removable battery.
if you dont need that go for one x 32 gb, its good and has a nice desin^^
ow and even ONE X is faster, they may have the same tegra 3, htc did a better jobs with perfomance, LG is slower.
but if you go for one X, install a custom rom, HTC sense is heavy and eats all the ram, my oncle has it with a AOSP rom and the phone is o much faster^^
but then still like always depends what you wanna do with phone
btw i see you have lg o2x, if you know the hell we had with for drivers, with the o4x, its not that wel also.
HTC is realy good.

Is OPTIMUS 2X display really better than Amoled Plus from Galaxy S1 (pls no fanboys) ?

yes..

I haven't found any comparision between displays so i wait more oppinions

AndyTimE said:
I haven't found any comparision between displays so i wait more oppinions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you want awnser, okay simple amoled has colorfull colors but no real white, its more green.
LCD of o2x has great white but yeah its lcd so colors are not the colorfull as amoled, amoled yeah black black, and lcd is juste black.
realy the difference aint that much, when you play angry birtds on s1 the colors will be very bright and shiny like little children toys/games
LCD of o2x is just more real. i have now a lg l9 and i can see the differnce the o2x has a very good LCD
even if my L9 has IPS lcd, the o2x is still much more whiter.
so yeah its just taste. when you have phone you wont see difences. only when you compare.
i only like amoled for its black (is texting app with black background its saves battery)
has no + or -
your choose its the phone that mathers