I'm curious to see what kind of speeds you guys are running you snapdragon 800 with voltage myself i managed to get to 2880 ghz running stock voltages and my cpu bin is PVS 0 has anyone managed to get to 3.0 GHZ or maybe even further post your speeds and voltage below
voltages are default trinity kernel, pvs 3, speed is obvious..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
simms22 said:
voltages are default trinity kernel, pvs 3, speed is obvious..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How's battery? 1 hr screen time?
aooga said:
How's battery? 1 hr screen time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, at that cpu speed, you are not allowed consider battery life! but i do use 2880/300 occasionally for a daily. ill see 4-4.5h sot normally with 2880/300. you have to remember, it doesnt stay at 2880mhz, itll only go there if it needs to.
simms22 said:
lol, at that cpu speed, you are not allowed consider battery life! but i do use 2880/300 occasionally for a daily. ill see 4-4.5h sot normally with 2880/300. you have to remember, it doesnt stay at 2880mhz, itll only go there if it needs to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
really? i dont see that much sot on stock speed i only get about 3.5hr sot max and thats with light usage
driftshadows said:
really? i dont see that much sot on stock speed i only get about 3.5hr sot max and thats with light usage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I regularly see 5-6 hours SoT on everything stock. Check the battery results thread as many are getting 7-8 with under clocking.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
driftshadows said:
really? i dont see that much sot on stock speed i only get about 3.5hr sot max and thats with light usage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
at stock speeds i usually see between 5 and 6 hours sot with heavy usage, on lte 100% of the time(no wifi). ill normally kill my battery in 7-12 hours, but that because im always using the phone. i dont let it lay around sleeping for hours.
simms22 said:
you have to remember, it doesnt stay at 2880mhz, itll only go there if it needs to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I was talking about your screenshot where it said both the min/max were 3000. You get pretty good battery out of this phone with 2880. I get about 3 hours on 1700, but thats for a different thread.
aooga said:
Yeah, I was talking about your screenshot where it said both the min/max were 3000. You get pretty good battery out of this phone with 2880. I get about 3 hours on 1700, but thats for a different thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i put it to 3014/3014 to makes sure and to show that it was actually running at 3014mhz. id be affraid to guess the battery life
simms22 said:
i put it to 3014/3014 to makes sure and to show that it was actually running at 3014mhz. id be affraid to guess the battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What voltages do you run 3014 MHz at? You said stock voltages, but could you look those up for me? I've been able to run Franco at 2880, but at 3014 I get reboots
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Gormsen said:
What voltages do you run 3014 MHz at? You said stock voltages, but could you look those up for me? I've been able to run Franco at 2880, but at 3014 I get reboots
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
reboots would be the normal behavior, i would think most phones wont be able to run at 3014mhz
driftshadows said:
really? i dont see that much sot on stock speed i only get about 3.5hr sot max and thats with light usage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from this evening/morning http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=50450077&postcount=4001
Swadin1 said:
Its helpful for me. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know there's a thanks button for that, right?
Okay, so I couldn't get Franco r33 to run more than 2880 MHz, so I switched to the newest Trinity (The one from the new build environment) and now I can easily hit 3014 MHz. I don't know if it will ever be of any use, but it's nice to know that it's possible
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Gormsen said:
You know there's a thanks button for that, right?
Okay, so I couldn't get Franco r33 to run more than 2880 MHz, so I switched to the newest Trinity (The one from the new build environment) and now I can easily hit 3014 MHz. I don't know if it will ever be of any use, but it's nice to know that it's possible
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sweet, so im not the only one that can
simms22 said:
sweet, so im not the only one that can
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, don't you think everybody is able to? Your device being a PSV 0 and mine being a 4, I don't think it makes much difference.
It could be fun to see how far we can push it. I don't experience any problems on 3014, so I'm thinking that we can go higher
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Gormsen said:
Nope, don't you think everybody is able to? Your device being a PSV 0 and mine being a 4, I don't think it makes much difference.
It could be fun to see how far we can push it. I don't experience any problems on 3014, so I'm thinking that we can go higher
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im a pvs 3. for 3 and 4 it should be easier to run. anyways, all cpus arent equal, some are better than others.
simms22 said:
im a pvs 3. for 3 and 4 it should be easier to run. anyways, all cpus arent equal, some are better than others.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry there, misread a previous post if yours. But think about it, wouldn't it be awesome figuring out how much we can push it. As a bonus I would love tauting my little brother, joking about how my phone runs at the double amount of clocks of his One (if 3.4 GHz is even possible)
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
bblzd said:
I regularly see 5-6 hours SoT on everything stock. Check the battery results thread as many are getting 7-8 with under clocking.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I get I might switch kernels to that could be the problem because I under clocked today and didn't do much on my phone as I was at school
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I tryed 3ghz and got a reboot. PVS 2 Trinity.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Tunderpimp said:
I tryed 3ghz and got a reboot. PVS 2 Trinity.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you try adjust the voltage at 3014mhz?
Related
Hello!
I was investigating ondemand governor for increasing my battery life and I discovered that our Nexus can drain too much less power than we thought. I have got almost 3 hours Screen On Time and have 57% battery left... Also I have to say that I spent all night with only 5% battery drain :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Note that I also get a very little decrease of general performance. But its very little
My current set:
ROM: Pure Speed X PSX 4.1 [JSS15Q] http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2392624
KERNEL: Faux Kernel JSS Mainline Build 22 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2008222
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tweaks for super-battery saving [use with trickster mod https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bigeyes0x0.trickstermod]:
GENERAL:
Read Ahead Buffer Size: 128
Scheduler: SIO
Frequency Lock: OFF
Min: 384000
Max: 918000
Governor: Ondemand
[These are the most important changes!]
-Down differential= 1
-Ignore nice load= 0
-Io is busy= 1
-Optimal freq= 384000
-Powersave bias= 250
-Sampling down factor= 1
-Sampling rate= 40000
-Sync freq= 384000
-Up threshold= 95
-Up threshold any cpu load = 95
-Up threshold multi core= 99
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SPECIFIC:
Force fast charge= Off
Eco mode= On
MPDecision= Off
Intelli-Plug= On
Vibrator strength= 70
Dynamic FSYNC= Off
Temperature Throttle= Off (Not neccesary, it never heats with this config)
GPU Governor= Ondemand
GPU Max Frquency= 400
ZRAM= Off
CPU Voltages: 700,725,725,750,750,775,775,825,825,850,850,875,etc...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please try this, and tell me the results, I want to know if we can make battery life even longer!!!
.
reserved...
i will use this if I discover more secrets
According to the screenshot, you just.. turn on the screen and leave it there?
linh1987 said:
According to the screenshot, you just.. turn on the screen and leave it there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I had been browsing with AOSP browser sending email and listened to some music via bluetooth. I use my phone a lot
I think that the config I posted above causes the battery monitor not register when the device is active, maybe because the phone never turns on 4 cores simultaneously, i dont know
It's no secret. you can have this battery life with a little tweaking. there at battery thread, you'll find better battery life than this.. Now Beat that
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
Sak3ater said:
It's no secret. you can have this battery life with a little tweaking. there at battery thread, you'll find better battery life than this.. Now Beat that
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still at 52% with 3H 13MIN 3S :victory:
18H 8min 19s on battery
You have charged the phone a bit
Hahahaha :laugh:
Just connected with Pc to copy some files..It took me not more than 20secs while the phone was connected with Pc..It does not make any difference.Just a little bump in the overall graph
Anyways..Your's battery life is great..I am gonna try these settings..
---------- Post added at 05:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:49 PM ----------
bamsbamx said:
No, I had been browsing with AOSP browser sending email and listened to some music via bluetooth. I use my phone a lot
I think that the config I posted above causes the battery monitor not register when the device is active, maybe because the phone never turns on 4 cores simultaneously, i dont know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's okay..It happens at my end as well..I do a lot of stuff but it never shows up in the battery graph..
bamsbamx said:
Hello!
I was investigating ondemand governor for increasing my battery life and I discovered that our Nexus can drain too much less power than we thought. I have got almost 3 hours Screen On Time and have 57% battery left... Also I have to say that I spent all night with only 5% battery drain :
Note that I also get a very little decrease of general performance. But its very little
My current set:
Tweaks for super-battery saving [use with trickster mod https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bigeyes0x0.trickstermod]:
Please try this, and tell me the results, I want to know if we can make battery life even longer!!!
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will these settings show alot effect on gaming
I'll game your battery life down to 3 hours no matter what settings you make.
Whta do you mean by?
CPU Voltages: 700,725,725,750,750,775,775,825,825,850,850,875,et c...
The CPU Voltages range from:
384000 = 850000
to
1512000=1150000
Do you mean just undervolt by ~150? on some phones that not safe, ~100 is better?
If you played games you won't be getting that much
Sak3ater said:
It's no secret. you can have this battery life with a little tweaking. there at battery thread, you'll find better battery life than this.. Now Beat that
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
No offense but your battery outcome is nothing special.
Getting 6h+ onscreen time is pretty normal with wifi on all the time.
I reach this with standard Kernel and m_plus Kernel on cyanogenmod 10.1 and 10.2 without tweaking anything.
But I am glad you could improve your battery
AcmE85 said:
No offense but your battery outcome is nothing special.
Getting 6h+ onscreen time is pretty normal with wifi on all the time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly.
Once, I had 3h screen time, browsing and facebook, and still 65% left. So, theoretically, using Wifi I could browse for at least 8 hours.
I was using JWR66V at the time, stock kernel and rom, with root.
Sully6789 said:
OK
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3Hrs sot,23Hrs total time & still 49% charge remaining :highfive:
Stop using SOT as some sort of benchmark. SOT differs for everyone and it depends what you're doing. For some, 3 hours is great, for some that's bad. It depends what you're doing. Anandtech got 6 hours SOT on the wifi benchmark for the Nexus 4 which requires the screen to be on at 200 nits brightness the whole time. You can easily get 6 hours reading an eBook.
So what?
Furthermore, underclocking your phone down to 1ghz isn't really an acceptable compromise to most.
Running it on dual core mode plus underclocked to 900 mhz and undervolted... Of course u can hit 6 hours
Nothing too fantastic
sent from my NEXUS 4 tasting a revamped cooking recipe of Jellybeans (stock 4.3).
I call your SOT screenshots and raise battery time at 100%
Sent from my Nexus 4
bamsbamx said:
No, I had been browsing with AOSP browser sending email and listened to some music via bluetooth. I use my phone a lot
I think that the config I posted above causes the battery monitor not register when the device is active, maybe because the phone never turns on 4 cores simultaneously, i dont know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
awake, means all 4 cores are running, usually when the touch screen is running, and no heavy app is used, 2 cores are only running.
Also, please stop making this "contest" on who's getting better batter life... just charge it every night before you go to bed, and everything will be fine.
Going camping in about 2 weeks, no internet there, i'll wipe everything, and go on a clean, stock, 4.3 ROM without installing any app, that way i can determine how well android works with the battery on its own.
Wow, for me I run @1836 interactive with 4096 sio and GPU @487 and I still get 4 hours
Sent from my Nexus 4 [NEO @1.836 GHz] on [PSX v4.1 4.3]
Hello everyone...i know we all share the same question...which kernel is better in terms of battery...so i decide (I had done this before but an admin lock the threat) but i decide to do it again..cause i really want this anwer, at least a part of it, to be answered...so i decide to stick with one rom, difficult don't try this, and simply flash all available kernels there is out there...run AnTuTu battery benchmark and compare the results
Im not so good with words so here it goes...
Rom Aokp Preview...I know all you start saying that this is a preview rom i should test this with a more stable rom...but all i want is to test the kernel it self...not the rom...so none or if a bit of rom bugs/drains will cause this test to fail cause i didnt use the phone at all, the whole 2 hours of the benchmark...
All my apps..i have at least Android is upgrating said 150 apps Titanium sais 98 without the system...i want to see the kernel working at a normal setup...maybe its nothing but who knows...
Wifi on 3G off...as i said i want this to be run at normal usage..we all have wifi open if not 100% 85% of our usage...
And for the end...i left all kernel settings pure default...i dont use FKU,Fauxclock,Semamanager or not even Trickster...if a dev as for example @morfic wants Trinity to work 2cores its fine by me...I didnt change nothing no UV no OC no UC no nothing....
The test needs 100% battery to run...of course..and a straight 2H and some minutes depenting on kernel to run from 100% to 73% to 46% and finaly to 19% by mesuring the time it took it to drain all this juice we found the drain per minute that we need to compare our kernels...
Test also mesures battery temp..so we mesure average battery temp...i have cpu temp widget but i can't stare the screen all this hours to check the temp when a sertane percedance is reached...also...for those who wanter why i haven't test francos yet...i also said this to @franciscofranco on google+ at 85%+- of the test i notice that the cpu gets really hot..im talking about 86C so the test stops..i manage to test it once by leaving my phone to my floor that cold but i mistakanly forgot 3G on and the test finish on 40minutes!
Anyway..here is my spreadsheet feel free to comment if i made something wrong specially on sums..and on the attachments i will add 3 pics of each kernel showing the end screen of the test,the rating of the test and the drain line on settings...
26/09/13:I decide to enable UnderVolt to the kernels from here and on...Matrix 11 just like franco...and semaphone for some strange reason don't have a proper thermal throtle...at 86C the test just stops...so im hopping i can keep it below that temp to be able to run the test!!
Thanks and remember this is just benchmark..feel free to test kernels yourself to see which one fits you best...and sorry that i kill your language!!
Next kernel: Bricked
21/09/13 Base rom changed to PSX....all kernels will be re-tested...sorry for the delay...
22/09/13:Finish benchmark for Faux123 26m
23/09/13:Finish benchmark for Trinity T4h
24/09/13:Finish benchmark for Stock 4.3
25/09/13:Finish benchmark for Franco 184*Retest needed
26/09/13:Finish benchmark for Matrix 11**-112mV enabled
26/09/13:Finish benchmark for Sema 1.6.5**-100mV enabled
27/09/13:Finish benchmark for AK 25+
28/09/13:Finish benchmark for NEO 12**-112mV enabled
28/09/13:Finish benchmark for Hells-core B38**-125mV enabled
29/09/13:Finish benchmark for Franco r184**-125mV enabled
30/09/13:Finish benchmark for Reborn90 r184**-125mV enabled
1/10/13:Finish benchmark for Bricked 20/9**-125mV enabled
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Wow I can already tell this is going to be very useful and answer a lot of questions, thanks in advance for this!!
a thought maybe.. how about adding the default nexus 4 android kernel to the graph? it would make the comparison more interesting
I think this is very utility, wating for franco kernel.
Wow OP.. By any chance after these test could you use the best kernel out of these test and also do a analysis on the radios of mako. I think 3g test can predict the difference on battery drain using each one of them.
simms22 said:
a thought maybe.. how about adding the default nexus 4 android kernel to the graph? it would make the comparison more interesting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could use the stock 4.3 kernel to check the difference...its a good advice....
arjunv said:
Wow OP.. By any chance after these test could you use the best kernel out of these test and also do a analysis on the radios of mako. I think 3g test can predict the difference on battery drain using each one of them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With 3G open the results are gonna hurt many devs...as i said the only success test with franco kernel with 3G open but not in use cause of open wifi...the test from 2.04hours of faux it goes to 40minutes with franco....im using hybrid .34 modem right now....even than im not be able to get any 4G signal... :/
Also thanks for you kind words....i thought by now the threat cause be locked by a admin like the 1st one!!
Nice thread! Will solve some general problems regarding kernels maybe.
3mperror said:
Nice thread! Will solve some general problems regarding kernels maybe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As i said they are just benchmarks...its gives an idea of what each kernel can do...at least of a non stop benchmarking point of view...
I finished semaphones benchmark but after the reboot i saw that from 18% the battery goes to 36% so there is something wrong with the batterystat.bin file...so i have to redo this benchmark so i can be as accurade as i can!!!
Very usefull thread,good job
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
Correct bench of Semaphone 1.6.5 next kernel again..franco r185!!!
intresting.....
waiting for Matr1x results
Some one out there have been doing the exact same thing over the past week with me then ! hahaha - I have Carbon Rom as a base, I have had it on Franco, Faux, Sema & Matrix - All same setup, same apps, same usage - And the best results I have had so far is Carbon + Matrix Kernel. Looking forward for your experience.
Ensifolk said:
Some one out there have been doing the exact same thing over the past week with me then ! hahaha - I have Carbon Rom as a base, I have had it on Franco, Faux, Sema & Matrix - All same setup, same apps, same usage - And the best results I have had so far is Carbon + Matrix Kernel. Looking forward for your experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you didnt do trinity kernel, id consider it one of the major kernel :crying:
just teasing
did you do the stock kernel, to use as a base?
simms22 said:
you didnt do trinity kernel, id consider it one of the major kernel :crying:
just teasing
did you do the stock kernel, to use as a base?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simms mate! Hehehe, first, love your pics on twitter! Second, I am still in the testing process - Gonna flash Trinity on a day I know Im gonna be on full wifi and free on time - I want the test to remain objective and under the same past conditions.
S2 has/had a similar thread. Great!
Excellent thread, I cannot wait till you finish your table, and btw, thanks for doing this man, big big help for all of us
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Thanks for all your kind words!!!
Is the antutu battery tester only causing heavy load? Because that would ignore kernel's idle drain
Also, I'd chose always the most recent kernel version to test. hellcore is at b37 right now (maybe just a typo?)
ccab said:
Is the antutu battery tester only causing heavy load? Because that would ignore kernel's idle drain
Also, I'd chose always the most recent kernel version to test. hellcore is at b37 right now (maybe just a typo?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question !
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
This is a very use full piece of work, thank you for your time, and I look forward to seeing how matrix does. one point to note as well as the comments about idle, is that different kernels behave differently sometimes depending on the ROM that they are paired with, so possibly repeating the test with a cyanogen based ROM and some 3rd ROM for all of the kernels before taking an average might be an interesting test. But of course it is up to you, I don't know how much time you have :thumbup:
Sent from my Rooted NEXUS 4
Hey Guys,
So I have been using the one for about 4 months now and battery has not been up to my exceptions...
I know, this thing has a quad and pushing more pixels but it has a 25% bigger battery too (1730 vs 2300). What I want to know is if there is a Rom that'll turn this phone into a 1.2GHZ DUAL core, thats right, just literally chop off 2 cores at ALL times to boost battery?
Haven't rooted the phone yet but this battery situation is wanting me to do that.
This is from experience but HTC EVO 3D got 18 hours after good amount of use and almost two years of battery use (rooted with a good kernel) vs HTC One with 10 hours with "fresh" battery (stock).
Thanks
Why would you want that??
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00CXKF42O
That will fix the battery issue if you don't mind it being bulky
Yeah, why cripple the phone when you could cripply your wallet AND the aesthetic of the phone!? Haha.
All seriousness, what kind of battery life are you getting?
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
Would need kernel source to make a custom kernel to shut down 2 of the cores
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
Root the One before trying to shut down cores. I had the 3D and this phone has much better battery. 10 hours is like 25% with decent use on the One. Something not right off that is what you are getting.
Sent from THE ONE using xda premium
Use cdma only in your mobile settings, This phone gets way better battery life than the 3d
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
Just underclock to 1.1 ghz
The cores support hotplugging. They are off if not being used. If they are being used, then they are being used to do something that will finish faster with more than two cores, in which case having two cores would give you less battery.
What you want is similar to people who want like 56mhz low power states. It consumes the same or more battery. If the phone could get literally free battery at the cost of just disabling two cores permanent...don't you think they would do that?
mikeius89 said:
Why would you want that??
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00CXKF42O
That will fix the battery issue if you don't mind it being bulky
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want the phone to be slim and light, I was almost about to buy the S4 but it was too similar to the S3 I had
felacio said:
Yeah, why cripple the phone when you could cripply your wallet AND the aesthetic of the phone!? Haha.
All seriousness, what kind of battery life are you getting?
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm getting about 10 hours with the use I had on the EVO 3D which btw got 18 hours
Felnarion said:
The cores support hotplugging. They are off if not being used. If they are being used, then they are being used to do something that will finish faster with more than two cores, in which case having two cores would give you less battery.
What you want is similar to people who want like 56mhz low power states. It consumes the same or more battery. If the phone could get literally free battery at the cost of just disabling two cores permanent...don't you think they would do that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So if what your saying it right, then why haven't phones increased DRAMATICALLY in battery life with these humongous batteries?
I will root the phone as soon as KitKat ROMs are released.
I've had the Evo 3d and i don't see how you got better battery on that thing. Don't bother with turning off cores, it won't help cause the other core will just be working harder. if you really want to try to save battery, underclock or use the power saver mode with "limit cpu" option. Either way, the biggest use of battery on this phone is not the processor, it's the screen.
Yeah I also had a 3d for a long damn time and I have no idea how you're getting worse battery life. My one gets around 3 hours screen on time. Lucky if I got an hour and a half with the 3d
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I say that's pretty good battery life for me. I'm on SWG check him out.
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
im with the others i have no idea how with the same use the 3d is lasting longer than the one, i use to have to charge my 3d by 1pm cause it was dead, the one can go all day and still have 15-25% when i got to bed.
smac7 said:
I've had the Evo 3d and i don't see how you got better battery on that thing. Don't bother with turning off cores, it won't help cause the other core will just be working harder. if you really want to try to save battery, underclock or use the power saver mode with "limit cpu" option. Either way, the biggest use of battery on this phone is not the processor, it's the screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you are right, the screen is sucking down the power, maybe I should get a lower res screen (Moto X?)
mntbkr said:
I say that's pretty good battery life for me. I'm on SWG check him out.
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will definitely be rooting as soon as a good KitKat ROM shows up, what is SWG?
To give people a reference to the awesome EVO 3D battery I had, one night (8 hrs no use) I lost only 3% battery! Compared to the HTC ONE I have lost 46% on standby over time
So obviously my next question is about screen res, any options to decrease screen res in certain ROMs or kernels?
You must have a rouge app or something. I recommend either finding what it is or doing a factory reset. The screen takes a lot of battery, but not that much. Also screen doesn't matter in stand by time.
Sent from my SM-P600 using Tapatalk 4
I agree. You need to see why yours is not sleeping well. Just as an example, I didn't use my phone for 9 hours while at work today, and my battery was at 91% when I got out. It seems as if yours isn't going into deep sleep when your not using it.
Also, I don't believe the display drain has to do with the res but more the screen backlight brightness setting. I have noticed that if I turn down the backlight when I can, it saves a little on the battery also. I've also noticed on mine that the WiFi being turned on is a big battery drain. I have my WiFi "sleep" during long periods of inactivity.
Good luck, YMMV
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
I see what you guys are saying. Let me factory reset the phone first, since rooting is such a pain these days. I will report back.
I might have a battery issue, so rooting can be problematic if I wanted a warranty repair.
I decreased my screen resolution and my battery life is amazing
My 3D had about the worse battery life of any phone I've had to be honest... If your One is getting worse than the 3D you likely have something set up wrong or poorly that is draining it.... Check your wakelock times on apps.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk
18th.abn said:
I decreased my screen resolution and my battery life is amazing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL
I found this thread very useful on the N4 forums, so here it is for the Nexus 5.
First, what is undervolting?
No two CPUs are made equally, every one is slightly different. This means they each need a different minimum voltage to run completely stable, so manufacturers set it high enough so that every chip can run without needing a voltage tailored to that specific chip. But this means that most devices can have their voltages lowered, and still run 100% stable
What are the benefits of undervolting?
In my experience, heat reduction is the main benefit. However, this heat reduction has implications elsewhere; for instance it means the thermal throttling will kick in later, so there is less of a performance drop. Also, less power is wasted to heat, meaning marginal gains in battery life. If you cannot run higher frequencies, i.e. over 2.26GHz, undervolting/overvolting these frequencies may help.
Any disadvantages?
Not really - you may experience reboots and instability, but that means you need to raise the voltages. Also, make sure you don't check set on boot until you know the voltages are stable, but if you have any problems you can flash the stock kernel, or in worst case wipe the data from a recovery.
How do I undervolt?
Many CPU apps are available to change the voltages, but personally I use Trickster Mod (donate). Just slowly decrease your voltages, small amounts at a time, and set them on boot when you are happy they are stable.
If you want to really want to get your voltages perfect, you can set the min/max frequency to one you want to modify, and edit each frequency to perfection. To save time, I'd recommend starting with the highly used frequencies - many apps can tell you which your device uses most often.
CPU Binning
I know on the nexus 4 the cpu bin was related to the amount users could undervolt, and Im sure the case is still the same, so heres how you can find out your CPU bin: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2515593 It would be useful to include your CPU bin in your post.
Here are my initial voltages, running ElementalX v0.7, CPU bin 3 and PSX - please, feel free to share yours (and your knowledge);
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Rules of the thread
Be nice to each other, use search if you have a question, and don't flame noobs for no reason.
It would be helpful to include your CPU bin and kernel in your post.
Also, if I have made any errors in the OP or you feel something should be added, quote this (so I get notified) and tell me, I'm sure theres a lot more information I could include!
Reserved
PVS3 -50 Stable
uh60james said:
What's your CPU bin?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just added to the op, I have a 3, which I think is about in the middle? I haven't had a proper look at the thread yet to find out
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Tom540 said:
I have a 3, which I think is about in the middle?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a 3 too. So far sitting stable at a global -62.5 undervolt the past few days. Tried -75 a few times and got reboots when turning the screen on.
AndrasLOHF said:
I have a 3 too. So far sitting stable at a global -62.5 undervolt the past few days. Tried -75 a few times and got reboots when turning the screen on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same has just happened to me too, so I'll bump them up to -62.5, although I think I should be able to keep the lower CPU clocks at lower voltages as I'm sure the higher ones are used when turning on the screen
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I'm running franco r14 and got two almost immediate reboots on your settings. Gonna go a little easier. I have no experience doing this, so it's still a bit confusing.
can probably go a bit easier on the higher clocks, my settings are -75 mv below 1.8 ghz and -50 above. Just played some deer hunter 2014 and seems to be fine. No reboots so farr! My bin is 3 as well. Running stock rom with faux003b6 kernel
I have a bin of 3 as well. I've only been brave enough to go -37.5 on Fauxs latest beta kernel
Sent from the jaws of my Hammerhead!
Got a CPU bin of 2. I went for -50 undervolt for all frequencies on Faux kernel 002 a few days ago, no reboots so far. Haven't tried -62.5 but -75 was too much, so I'll stick with -50.
I was a little bummed when I found out I had bin 2, but I've been running -75mv no problem for the past few days on bricked kernel
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
You guys are lucky. My phone has bin of 1, could only uv 50mv on high frequency and 75mv on the low end, and I have higher default voltage to begin with.
---------- Post added at 01:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:29 AM ----------
So far I believe the best app to test UV stability is Antutu Benchmark, I could pass StabilityTest no problem but Antutu always FC when I UV bit too hard.
Spunky_Monkey said:
I was a little bummed when I found out I had bin 2, but I've been running -75mv no problem for the past few days on bricked kernel
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow.. im have bin 3 and anything past -62 I get reboots... I think I got ripped of on on my cpu
gd6noob said:
wow.. im have bin 3 and anything past -62 I get reboots... I think I got ripped of on on my cpu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly the same with me - I think I might be able to set the lower CPU clocks with voltages lower though, I just need a bit more time to test
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I have a PVS 0 and I can undervolt - 100 without any lockups or reboot. Actually the device hasn't rebooted on me once ever. The only problem is it lacks CPU performance but the GPU works fine.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Tom540 said:
Exactly the same with me - I think I might be able to set the lower CPU clocks with voltages lower though, I just need a bit more time to test
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me know what your findings are... im just too lazy to test all the configs..
gd6noob said:
wow.. im have bin 3 and anything past -62 I get reboots... I think I got ripped of on on my cpu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bin 3 here, I've been running with - 75 since yesterday without problem... Maybe I'll go lower
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk 2
PVS 2 running - 75 volts full speed. Deer hunter runs great so far. Might try - 100 after more testing.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
seems like pvs3 is NOT the best for UVing, its all accross the board, im on PVS2 and i think i can do -75 easily , i think im on -50 accross, using franco kernel r14
It might be helpful if everyone included the actual voltages as well, as some have reported starting with different voltages, and some kernels UV put of the box.
PVS 3, I'm running 712.5 @ 300MHz, and 962.5 @ 2.26GHz; check the screenshot in the OP for all voltages
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Hi everyone, i want to share something that most of u dont know...
Quadrant can be manipulated in order to get higher scores. Just download this and share your scores before and after using this:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.doomlord.quadrantbooster
Whit the hack installed and activated you cant get up to 2k+ to your usual score. Thats why i dont trust Quadrant, just Antutu.
Note: This app doesnt increase your device performance, just manipulate the scores.
The app was developed by DoomLord, is a recognized dev, so dont be scared to try. Needs root.
Have a nice day ^^
edit:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
Samsung Approves your thread!
philipepi said:
Samsung Approves your thread!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Why would someone want to spoof their benchmarks? So that they matter even less than they already do?
philipepi said:
Samsung Approves your thread!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung never cheated, merely took the cap off the HW and let it fly. I do not particularly care about benchmarks, but if I did, I'd like to see the absolute HW maximum, cause that's the whole point.
I do check benchmarks of new SoCs though, to get a rought estimate what they can do.
No. They cheated.
BoneXDA said:
Samsung never cheated, merely took the cap off the HW and let it fly. I do not particularly care about benchmarks, but if I did, I'd like to see the absolute HW maximum, cause that's the whole point.
I do check benchmarks of new SoCs though, to get a rought estimate what they can do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they did, letting the device overclocl itself when a benchmark app is open is cheating because you get scores you normally won't have...
philipepi said:
Samsung Approves your thread!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are a fu##ing legend
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
I'm fairly sure this hack hasn't worked for a long time.. it boosts your I/O scores by putting data in working memory.. would only help if running older hardware
I haven't actually tried it though
failly said:
Yes they did, letting the device overclocl itself when a benchmark app is open is cheating because you get scores you normally won't have...
You are a fu##ing legend
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no such thing as "normal operation", clocks change all the time so our battery doesn't die by 11AM. Some Sammy apps get access to more performance, others hit nowhere near maximum for efficiency, which is why benchmarking doesn't tell the everyday story. It tells developers how far the HW can go, and the Note 3 shows the SD800 raw capabilities better than say the benchmarks of the Nexus 5.
For everyday performance like Chrome, Flipboard etc., use Chrome, Flipboard etc. for testing.
meangreenie said:
I'm fairly sure this hack hasn't worked for a long time.. it boosts your I/O scores by putting data in working memory.. would only help if running older hardware
I haven't actually tried it though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah a lot of the reviews on the Play store are saying it actually lowers their overall score
BoneXDA said:
There is no such thing as "normal operation", clocks change all the time so our battery doesn't die by 11AM. Some Sammy apps get access to more performance, others hit nowhere near maximum for efficiency, which is why benchmarking doesn't tell the everyday story. It tells developers how far the HW can go, and the Note 3 shows the SD800 raw capabilities better than say the benchmarks of the Nexus 5.
For everyday performance like Chrome, Flipboard etc., use Chrome, Flipboard etc. for testing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IMO, it's like doping.
The athletes(Samsung's phone) can run fast but without this doping(benchmark booster file of Samsung) they run slower.
There indeed isn't such thing as a 'normal clock', but there is such thing as a maximum clock frequency, pushing this frequency means overclocking.
In some way it isn't cheating because overclocking is a known term.
On the other side it makes it cheating since 'normal' that doesn't know sh#t about overclocking, will have their phone getting overclocked without even knowing it.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
meangreenie said:
I'm fairly sure this hack hasn't worked for a long time.. it boosts your I/O scores by putting data in working memory.. would only help if running older hardware
I haven't actually tried it though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can confirm is still working, gonna upload some screenshots later.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
AlderCass said:
Why would someone want to spoof their benchmarks? So that they matter even less than they already do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would someone run a benchmark? Because they care about the scores.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
ChavitoArg said:
Why would someone run a benchmark? Because they care about the scores.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To check the performance of their device, and to compare it with others. To check performance differences before and after flashing roms etc. But definitely not so that they can lie about how powerful their device is, when it really isn't.
ChavitoArg said:
Why would someone run a benchmark? Because they care about the scores.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If they care about the scores, why would they intentionally use an app to make those scores completely inaccurate?
AlderCass said:
If they care about the scores, why would they intentionally use an app to make those scores completely inaccurate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont take me wrong.
There is people that care about the score just to show off, because of it the app exist and because of this there is people using and rating the app. I wanted to show that quadrant doesnt show real performance, it can easily be manipulated.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
confirmed, it does work on 4.4.2 using motox dalvik
but it's fairly obvious if you have used it lol.. on my nexus 5 I got 15000 plus io score
BoneXDA said:
There is no such thing as "normal operation", clocks change all the time so our battery doesn't die by 11AM. Some Sammy apps get access to more performance, others hit nowhere near maximum for efficiency, which is why benchmarking doesn't tell the everyday story. It tells developers how far the HW can go, and the Note 3 shows the SD800 raw capabilities better than say the benchmarks of the Nexus 5.
For everyday performance like Chrome, Flipboard etc., use Chrome, Flipboard etc. for testing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes there is such a thing as normal operation.
They cheated. They were the only ones that overclocked the gpu for any apps on its white list. Nothing else could ever use that gpu clock period. It detected a app and gave the system a higher clock than the device would otherwise be able to hit. It's pure cheating.
They also basically turned off the thermal throttle. Another pure cheat.
They aren't doing this for developers. What a crock. They're doing it to cheat and inflate benchmark scores so their devices look better on a chart or in some clueless YouTube reviewers video.
The app just puts everything to max frequency. Not much of a hack..
albundy2010 said:
Yes there is such a thing as normal operation.
They cheated. They were the only ones that overclocked the gpu for any apps on its white list. Nothing else could ever use that gpu clock period. It detected a app and gave the system a higher clock than the device would otherwise be able to hit. It's pure cheating.
They also basically turned off the thermal throttle. Another pure cheat.
They aren't doing this for developers. What a crock. They're doing it to cheat and inflate benchmark scores so their devices look better on a chart or in some clueless YouTube reviewers video.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Supercars are speed capped for street use, and you know you'll never run them at full speed; yet watching a car show I bet you wanna see them pushed to the limit, don't ya?
The point you are missing is that if Samsung can make the Note 3 blow the roof over your head, then you can too if you are a talented developer, otherwise why even bother with benchmarks, you don't need such power for your everyday apps. Quite the contrary: Samsung & others cheat every other app setting lower clock policies for longer battery life. Now tell me how many happy Note users are complaining that their alarm clock or live wallpaper doesn't run at full clock?
If they don't, why do you?