Here you go, I made a quick video for Antutu X Benchmark between both devices ( Snap and Exynos )
Lets guess which device ( which CPU ) on left and right while watching this clip and then you have your answer.
Video was captured with an iphone 5 ( YEAH I know, Samsung is gonna be p*ssed LOL ).
Enjoy!
That answers my question somewhat, so the 5422 has a slight edge on the first benchmark, yet lost the second ,making it 1 to 1, but the s801 finished the test first on both testes.
Sent from my LG-D959 using Tapatalk
Are all 8 cores running on the 5422 version?
Wow, you really have both version?
Please make full comparison especially speed/tw , battery and camera.
Sent from my GT-I9500
BoneXDA said:
Are all 8 cores running on the 5422 version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont think so. Maybe the 64 bit will
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
copualt3 said:
That answers my question somewhat, so the 5422 has a slight edge on the first benchmark, yet lost the second ,making it 1 to 1, but the s801 finished the test first on both testes.
Sent from my LG-D959 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 5422 in general i felt very very smooth. major problem is still there: its hot!
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
leoaudio13 said:
I dont think so. Maybe the 64 bit will
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting... in Barcelona Samsung announced that the 5422 will support Heterogeneous Multi Processing allowing all 8 cores to run if necessary. The Note 3 Neo's 5260 can run all 6, so the S5 5422 may need an update, or benchmark tools need it, what do you think, @AndreiLux?
BoneXDA said:
Interesting... in Barcelona Samsung announced that the 5422 will support Heterogeneous Multi Processing allowing all 8 cores to run if necessary. The Note 3 Neo's 5260 can run all 6, so the S5 5422 may need an update, or benchmark tools need it, what do you think, @AndreiLux?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a chance to played with it for half a day but its damn hot while running bench. not so sure if it ran with all eight cores at once. Gotta check again 2mo. But imo, the Exynos is very smooth. But the camera on Exynos version is not so good. Dont know why Even i took a few shots and compare with the LG G2, the G2 beats it with much better quality
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
leoaudio13 said:
I got a chance to played with it for half a day but its damn hot while running bench. not so sure if it ran with all eight cores at once. Gotta check again 2mo. But imo, the Exynos is very smooth. But the camera on Exynos version is not so good. Dont know why Even i took a few shots and compare with the LG G2, the G2 beats it with much better quality
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you say the camera on the Exynos is better?
Also how about the headphone sound quality, any differences, if so which sounds better
BoneXDA said:
Interesting... in Barcelona Samsung announced that the 5422 will support Heterogeneous Multi Processing allowing all 8 cores to run if necessary. The Note 3 Neo's 5260 can run all 6, so the S5 5422 may need an update, or benchmark tools need it, what do you think, @AndreiLux?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's running HMP...
AndreiLux said:
It's running HMP...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi sir,
Then are you gonna support it...I mean Exynos ver. Now its prefect to add your tweaks in it
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Right now honestly HMP seems a bit far-fetched. Most app developers don't even use more than 1 thread for their apps. Waste of battery imo.
AndreiLux said:
It's running HMP...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you Andrei! So can it run all 8 cores right now, does it depend on Samsung or the apps?
degast said:
Right now honestly HMP seems a bit far-fetched. Most app developers don't even use more than 1 thread for their apps. Waste of battery imo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The point of HMP is load balancing between the cores. It still has advantages even in low threaded apps. The cores are powered off when not doing anything.
BoneXDA said:
Thank you Andrei! So can it run all 8 cores right now, does it depend on Samsung or the apps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends on nothing specifically. If load is sufficiently high and threaded it'll use all 8.
I think Antutu is finishing the tests slower than the Snapdragon because it's dispatching twice the threads and doing twice the work, it would score higher if it actually didn't do that.
And no I'm not getting it, the S5 will be outdated in a few months.
AndreiLux said:
The point of HMP is load balancing between the cores. It still has advantages even in low threaded apps. The cores are powered off when not doing anything.
It depends on nothing specifically. If load is sufficiently high and threaded it'll use all 8.
I think Antutu is finishing the tests slower than the Snapdragon because it's dispatching twice the threads and doing twice the work, it would score higher if it actually didn't do that.
And no I'm not getting it, the S5 will be outdated in a few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its coming up for real, the F
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
AndreiLux said:
The point of HMP is load balancing between the cores. It still has advantages even in low threaded apps. The cores are powered off when not doing anything.
It depends on nothing specifically. If load is sufficiently high and threaded it'll use all 8.
I think Antutu is finishing the tests slower than the Snapdragon because it's dispatching twice the threads and doing twice the work, it would score higher if it actually didn't do that.
And no I'm not getting it, the S5 will be outdated in a few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also found that the HMP wherether its running or not, its not so right. Even though its very smooth, but well, its not so different from the 801 version. Also its HOT. I just felt its incompleted
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
leoaudio13 said:
I also found that the HMP wherether its running or not, its not so right. Even though its very smooth, but well, its not so different from the 801 version. Also its HOT. I just felt its incompleted
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on the thermal throttling settings between the two, Samsung changed the limits several times on both versions of the S4 so expect the same to happen here.
AndreiLux said:
Depends on the thermal throttling settings between the two, Samsung changed the limits several times on both versions of the S4 so expect the same to happen here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably we have to wait for S6 for the HMP to mature also we'll for your support as well Andrei :good:
leoaudio13 said:
Its coming up for real, the F
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean the Galaxy F?
This could be it I think: http://www.sammobile.com/2014/04/03/samsung-sm-g906s-with-qhd-2560x1440-screen-appears-in-benchmark/
0mega007 said:
So you say the camera on the Exynos is better?
Also how about the headphone sound quality, any differences, if so which sounds better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the same for both models really. Sound quality is the same, still Samsung quality. But both have AptX so it wont be a big problem Both external speakers are the same, 1 word: shjt! I wish the speakers werent in the back
Related
Hi all!
I've some antutu results... it seems that on 1600Mhz, Note is far behind (compared to S2) in the following values:
2D (126 ?!)
3D (598 ?!)
SD card read (8.9MB)
this is with AbyssNote 3.1 kernel and Criskelo V1, but I've similar results with stock and other ROMs too. Using Chainfire's 3D driver don't change the results.
Do you have any knowledge about these values and/or the reasons behind 'em?
and what about real world performance not a benchmark?
benchmarks are great for giving people something to brag about, but these are not real world tests, compare it side by side for speed when using the phone not a benchmark
killerjohn said:
Hi all!
I've some antutu results... it seems that on 1600Mhz, Note is far behind (compared to S2) in the following values:
2D (126 ?!)
3D (598 ?!)
SD card read (8.9MB)
this is with AbyssNote 3.1 kernel and Criskelo V1, but I've similar results with stock and other ROMs too. Using Chainfire's 3D driver don't change the results.
Do you have any knowledge about these values and/or the reasons behind 'em?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to run 2 or 3 time benchmark. this a known issue to Mali as GPU will always lock to 160mhz from the higher 267mhz..
For sdcard read/write use some app that change the sd cache size to higher value to increase that.
Richy99 said:
and what about real world performance not a benchmark?
benchmarks are great for giving people something to brag about, but these are not real world tests, compare it side by side for speed when using the phone not a benchmark
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it FEELS much worse, this is why I started some bechmarks...
I've two S2 (stock and custom OC, UV) and a Note, so I know what I'm talking about...
Note is pretty fast. You on crack.
Atrix_E said:
Note is pretty fast. You on crack.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really don't want to ignore you, but S2 is much more lagfree. And it seems that the GPU is really much slower than on S2. Please don't be an "Apple fan" who is just talking that "oo it's perfect, better than anything". NO. It (I mean the Note) has bugs. Serious ones.
It has been said millions of times...
The note has nearly twice the pixel of the s2 so it has to work much more for every frame...
Wait for ICS and the note will burst your mind away
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
ok I'll.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
I have both and I can say the s2 is a tad snappier than the GNote.Both are stock.To say that the Note is much worse is BS unless you have sytem power saving on.
Alexforfun said:
It has been said millions of times...
Wait for ICS and the note will burst your mind away
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't have to wait that long.
I'm blown away at how fast the lastest custom roms are (the XLA3 ones).
Samsung keeps releasing new ROMS every couple of weeks, and the Note just gets better and better with each one.
- Frank
ChodTheWacko said:
Samsung keeps releasing new ROMS every couple of weeks, and the Note just gets better and better with each one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. Everyone knows that the S2 is currently a little bit snappier than the Note with stock ROMs. But the S2 has been out so much longer, so it's hardly surprising.
In a few weeks' time, the Note will be snappier on Gingerbread, let alone ICS.
You could say that manufacturers should get ROMs in better working order before they release the phones, but that's just the way software is moving in general (test out software on paying customers).
Alexforfun said:
It has been said millions of times...
The note has nearly twice the pixel of the s2 so it has to work much more for every frame...
Wait for ICS and the note will burst your mind away
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note is pretty fast but ain't as smooth my dead S2. It's remarkable that Exynos can handle a large amount of pixels without slowing down that much.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Remember the S2 has to power 800x480=384000 pixels. While the Note has to power 1280x800=1024000 pixels.
This is 2,666666 times more!
Benchmarks dont mean anything. my S2 can score twice higher but it performs worse.
Ironic that the Nexus 4 has thermal problems when Qualcomm seems particularly proud of the low temps of the S4 chip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mSD_EhgGSc
It'll be fine man.
wait for the phone.
Saw everyone *****ing about the Benchmarks right?
and see the Improvements now,so wait 3 more days
XxStatiX said:
It'll be fine man.
wait for the phone.
Saw everyone *****ing about the Benchmarks right?
and see the Improvements now,so wait 3 more days
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm confident they will work it out. I will wait 3 more days AND wait for one hardware revision before locking myself in.
dynamicpda said:
I'm confident they will work it out. I will wait 3 more days AND wait for one hardware revision before locking myself in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah man i'm pretty confident too.
This one's should be a beast.
And at this price,we shouldnt complain too much :silly:
XxStatiX said:
It'll be fine man.
wait for the phone.
Saw everyone *****ing about the Benchmarks right?
and see the Improvements now,so wait 3 more days
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The improvements were from putting the phone in the freezer. Do you intend to operate your phone in a freezer at all times?
abe in space said:
The improvements were from putting the phone in the freezer. Do you intend to operate your phone in a freezer at all times?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Throttling only happens in graphics benchmarks!!!!!
When you play games the GPU is fast enought reach the vsznc limit (60fps) without any problems which means the GPU isn't fully stressed and won't throttle .
And besides even when throttled the Adreno is still 2x faster then tegra 3 or mali-400mp in some benchmarks.
That beeing said I'm pretty confident that this problem will be fixed either by LG/Qualcomm themselves or by the great devs in this forum (undervolting, raising the temperature the GPU starts to throttle)
abe in space said:
The improvements were from putting the phone in the freezer. Do you intend to operate your phone in a freezer at all times?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source ?
Отправлено с моего GT-I9300 через Tapatalk
Disregard
abe in space said:
The improvements were from putting the phone in the freezer. Do you intend to operate your phone in a freezer at all times?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Says who?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
how will we know when they have a hardware revision? how long does that usually take?
abe in space said:
The improvements were from putting the phone in the freezer. Do you intend to operate your phone in a freezer at all times?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
USSENTERNCC1701E said:
I think you may have taken a joke out of context.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, well there it on the reddit post
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/12rk7s/anandtech_have_run_new_nexus_4_benchmarks_which/
My point is that we should wait to see the true story for ourselves.
Hmmm.
XxStatiX said:
My point is that we should wait to see the true story for ourselves.
Hmmm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://twitter.com/nerdtalker/status/266194787466616832
its most probably a low thermal limit set for the review devices. its set to 60c? that is kind of low to set it at that value. the Galaxy Nexus was set to 80c if im not mistaken
Wait for the final devices, then we can test it ourselves
IINexusII said:
its most probably a low thermal limit set for the review devices. its set to 60c? that is kind of low to set it at that value. the Galaxy Nexus was set to 80c if im not mistaken
Wait for the final devices, then we can test it ourselves
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Galaxy S2 has a limit of 85°C if I'm not mistaken, 60°C seems pretty conservative indeed.
wurzelsepp3 said:
The Galaxy S2 has a limit of 85°C if I'm not mistaken, 60°C seems pretty conservative indeed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ah well if the s2s thermal limit was 85 , then yea, maybe this is just set a little too conservative
Do we know it has thermal issues? I've seen no proof and only speculation.....
---------- Post added at 01:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:31 PM ----------
italia0101 said:
ah well if the s2s thermal limit was 85 , then yea, maybe this is just set a little too conservative
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dunno my GS2 got really hot around the camera area, so boiling I had to get a case for it lol.
WTF :silly:
1- this s4 dual core = less heating
2- yeah the dumbest thing ever compering 28Nm cpu with 40Nm cpu
I asked a reviewer (one who has only just posted their review, so they spent alot longer than some with the phone) on G+ whether he noticed any overheating. He said he hadn't ANY warming at all. It sounds like for every day use there won't be any issue.
Brac20 said:
I asked a reviewer (one who has only just posted their review, so they spent alot longer than some with the phone) on G+ whether he noticed any overheating. He said he hadn't ANY warming at all. It sounds like for every day use there won't be any issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The basic point is that it does happen. Which it shouldn't. Perhaps the problem is indeed that they set the max temp too low (60c). Only time will tell.
Yes, as you can see samsung ditched their exynos processor for snap dragon 801 and it is a super great news.. you all please post your opinions..
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
And they ditched Wolfson too.
BaronInkjet said:
And they ditched Wolfson too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that leads to tremendous dissapointment! hah
NoteboyTech said:
And that leads to tremendous dissapointment! hah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absent a real home run, they would not get my business again. And that clearly didn't happen.
NoteboyTech said:
Yes, as you can see samsung ditched their exynos processor for snap dragon 801 and it is a super great news.. you all please post your opinions..
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't even know if the Exynos Infinity is a processor or not. LOL
dandroid13 said:
You don't even know if the Exynos Infinity is a processor or not. LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what exynos infinity is.
I was happy for snapdragon so that LTE is confirmed and we can have more love from the developers...
You know s4 i9500 didnt have lot of love from devs...
Yet a 64 bit octacore exynos infinity would have been ground breaking
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
NoteboyTech said:
I know what exynos infinity is.
I was happy for snapdragon so that LTE is confirmed and we can have more love from the developers...
You know s4 i9500 didnt have lot of love from devs...
Yet a 64 bit octacore exynos infinity would have been ground breaking
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon is only good if you're looking for AOSP, all major custom ROMs are there for the Exynos S4 like Omega and Wanam. So what is the Exynos Infinity?
Bro, I know that's why I said the developer love! yet see there is no 4g on i9500 and sm-n900 the s4 and note 3 so in the end if you own a superspeedy device you would require a super speedy internet! so for the sake of 4g I am praising the snapdragon! nevertheless you post your opinion! Explain us about exynos infinity"processor"
I read somewhere that they ate thinking of exynos version.
Sent from Note 3 (The beauty & beast)
Exynos infinity was a god damn tagline, not a processor. Stop reading BS sites.
No it didnt ditch exynos 2.1ghz.. bencchmark topper will come
sent via Samsung Galaxy S4 i9500
http://www.engadget.com/2014/02/25/samsung-galaxy-s5-octo-core/
Don't know if it's Exynos Infinity, but Samsung never claimed that Infinity would be coming to the S5. Infinity probably doesn't even have the yields yet to be used.
Well that was fast. Samsung already updated and removed the octo core version.
vbetts said:
http://www.engadget.com/2014/02/25/samsung-galaxy-s5-octo-core/
Don't know if it's Exynos Infinity, but Samsung never claimed that Infinity would be coming to the S5. Infinity probably doesn't even have the yields yet to be used.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos "infinity" is not the name of a processor(or lineup) again,it may be called something else (GH7 was something leaks were pointing out at,but nothing definite as such)
i9100g user said:
Exynos "infinity" is not the name of a processor(or lineup) again,it may be called something else (GH7 was something leaks were pointing out at,but nothing definite as such)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So then Infinity was just the name of the event for Exynos?
Not like it matters either way, Exynos yields recently weren't high enough to take to other parts of the world.
NoteboyTech said:
No it didnt ditch exynos 2.1ghz.. bencchmark topper will come
sent via Samsung Galaxy S4 i9500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos 5422 (2.1ghz A15s ,A7s at 1.5ghz?)
What about GPU? 628 or 678 they will need to improve their GPU performance to match the performance of adreno 330 in snapdragon variant (so a higher clocked 628 or 678)
A15 cores running at 2.1GHz yeah it will either melt ur device or it will suck the battery in very fast time , and probably its stuck with the ****ing clusters migration with NO GTS :|
so probably the Snap 801 will be better
and the funny thing Samsung didn't mention anything about GS5 with Exynos ( seems they are ashamed with their processor )
There is still little information about the octa variant. No review about score and battery life.
So I was able to install antutu on demo unit. The score is high and the phone is not heating. All 8 cores can run together but Antutu reports the freq is 500-1300MHz and not recognize the cpu model name.
Please post your benchmark and battery life.
dragon135 said:
There is still little information about the octa variant. No review about score and battery life.
So I was able to install antutu on demo unit. The score is high and the phone is not heating. All 8 cores can run together but Antutu reports the freq is 500-1300MHz and not recognize the cpu model name.
Please post your benchmark and battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn. Exynos is consistently higher than the Snapdragon 801 in Antutu.
Only disappointment is the lack of LTE though(and ROMs too).
The new Exynos version come with new kind of fine-grained power management, overheating should be of the past and impossible.
Here's a benchmark video of the Exynos version.
It scores a chart topping 39029 on Antutu, that too without all the benchmark boosting involved!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P67kWKA4Lso&feature=youtube_gdata_player
AndreiLux said:
The new Exynos version come with new kind of fine-grained power management, overheating should be of the past and impossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi @AndreiLux,
Nice to see your comment, Do you confirm the S5 Exynos version? I mean we forget S4 I9500 problems and this new version has no problem? Thanks.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
AndreiLux said:
The new Exynos version come with new kind of fine-grained power management, overheating should be of the past and impossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung advertises "True Octa Core" capabilities with this device and this certainly means that Samsung is shipping the device with HMP enabled.
Does HMP offer better battery management over the previous implementations?
system.img said:
Samsung advertises "True Octa Core" capabilities with this device and this certainly means that Samsung is shipping the device with HMP enabled.
Does HMP offer better battery management over the previous implementations?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It comes with HMP but that's not what I'm talking about.
The device comes with something called ARM Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA) which is basically a very fine-grained power tracking and estimation thermal framework to control DVFS. The device is capped at 3.5W TDP between all CPUs and GPU, so it should never cause a heating overrun. And it seems that it doesn't affect performance given the videos.
Galaxy s3 + galaxy s4 = galaxy s5
Amazing power
AndreiLux said:
It comes with HMP but that's not what I'm talking about.
The device comes with something called ARM Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA) which is basically a very fine-grained power tracking and estimation thermal framework to control DVFS. The device is capped at 3.5W TDP between all CPUs and GPU, so it should never cause a heating overrun. And it seems that it doesn't affect performance given the videos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't mean that you mentioned about HMP in your earlier post. I just had a question about the battery performance of HMP.
Can you comment on that?
Thanks for this info. :beer:
@Andrei So is this exynos 4422 in S5?
What is the difference then with the new exynos 4430?
Won't you buy S5 Octa?
Sent from GT-I9500
AndreiLux said:
The new Exynos version come with new kind of fine-grained power management, overheating should be of the past and impossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is still Andrei it is still
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
leoaudio13 said:
It is still Andrei it is still
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've read the opposite from other people such as the OP. All depends on firmware you had on your version. We'll see when somebody actually bothers to properly test it. I'm just stating what I see in the code.
@dragon135
The 5430 has a HEVC decoder, dedicated clock domain on the display interface, higher clocks in general, GPU at 600MHz (no info on core count but improvement is a possibility), and a new dedicated A5 co-processor for audio decoding and encoding called "Siren". The HEVC decoder alone is worth it imho since it provides good future-proofing of the device.
AndreiLux said:
I've read the opposite from other people such as the OP. All depends on firmware you had on your version. We'll see when somebody actually bothers to properly test it. I'm just stating what I see in the code.
@dragon135
The 5430 has a HEVC decoder, dedicated clock domain on the display interface, higher clocks in general, GPU at 600MHz (no info on core count but improvement is a possibility), and a new dedicated A5 co-processor for audio decoding and encoding called "Siren". The HEVC decoder alone is worth it imho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
5430???? :what::what::what::what::what::what::what::what::what:
AndreiLux said:
I've read the opposite from other people such as the OP. All depends on firmware you had on your version. We'll see when somebody actually bothers to properly test it. I'm just stating what I see in the code.
@dragon135
The 5430 has a HEVC decoder, dedicated clock domain on the display interface, higher clocks in general, GPU at 600MHz (no info on core count but improvement is a possibility), and a new dedicated A5 co-processor for audio decoding and encoding called "Siren". The HEVC decoder alone is worth it imho since it provides good future-proofing of the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 900H I tested ( i made a vid on that ) was hot as hell after 2 or 3 antutubench. Not sure as if it was the final version but my first impression on the Octa was really really impressed with fluidity and speed. However, if watch closely to my vid, u can see the octa will slightly slow down and get hot after a period of hesvy tasks. I wouldnt say it might be at that overheated but I can feel the temp while holding 2 different variants in hands. Well, let see how the octa performs in the future. I might get 1 final H version to test to but I want to get the M8 to test as too many guys claiming the M8 is way better than the S5 hehe.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 01:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:56 AM ----------
Btw, the octa performed quite low in graphic test in my vid. I thought Mali would have performed way better than Snap version :/ kinda confused
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
leoaudio13 said:
Btw, the octa performed quite low in graphic test in my vid. I thought Mali would have performed way better than Snap version :/ kinda confused
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Adreno 330 is too fat. ARM promises performance improvements via drivers but we'll see if that'll happen or not.
iba21 said:
5430???? :what::what::what::what::what::what::what::what::what:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what "what" ? Samsung Exynos 5430
Pako7 said:
what "what" ? Samsung Exynos 5430
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well.. it's my first time witch i read something about 5430.. for me the "last" was the 5422
it means, 5422 is only another unusefull chip til a better soc.. in this case the 5430..
AndreiLux said:
and a new dedicated A5 co-processor for audio decoding and encoding called "Siren".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Andrei.. may be "SEIREN" ?
And how do you know about the frequency of the GPU?
iba21 said:
Well.. it's my first time witch i read something about 5430.. for me the "last" was the 5422
it means, 5422 is only another unusefull chip til a better soc.. in this case the 5430..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well.. but about 5430 known since the beginning of the year .. but there is still 5440
Pako7 said:
Andrei.. may be "SEIREN" ?
---------- Post added at 12:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 AM ----------
well.. but about 5430 known since the beginning of the year .. but there is still 5440
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im eagerly waiting for the 64 bits Exynos cant wait to get hands on it haha
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Yep but.. there are a lot of rumors about socs.. the 5430 was rumored as 64bit cpu.. and it was a rumor outed when there weren't infos about 5420 soc..
5440 is in kernel sources.. never ever umderstood it..
As we already know that in cpu exynod version wins the snapdragon loses
same here with gpu the exynos version has mali t760 wins and beats snapdragon andreno 450
here is the http://www.androidauthority.com/galaxy-note-4-exynos-5433-vs-snapdragon-805-395820/
Adreno 450? Wow
Texted from Note 4
bala_gamer said:
Adreno 450? Wow
Texted from Note 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
This is from june.
Iyrah said:
As we already know that in cpu exynod version wins the snapdragon loses
same here with gpu the exynos version has mali t760 wins and beats snapdragon andreno 450
here is the http://www.androidauthority.com/galaxy-note-4-exynos-5433-vs-snapdragon-805-395820/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what the hell they did, but I'm getting 47068 on ATU with my 910F/snapdragon 805
I got 49900 on exynos
Iyrah said:
I got 49900 on exynos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i got infinity on snapdragon
here is you place
Note: most people here know exynos has the upper hand in overall comparison with sd805
Iyrah said:
I got 49900 on exynos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But you are damned to run Touchwiz. We snapdragon guys are on CM12 and it's getting pretty damn stable already Needless to say it blows Touchwiz totally out of the water in terms of performance, fluidness and overal responsiveness. Ah and I noted 20%-30% faster NAND throughput times, not sure if that's due to Lollipop (ah yeah, forgot you guys are still waiting for Samsung to release lollipop, haha)
BTW, I didnt optimize anything at all, just benchmarked out of the box Touchwiz, as shipped. With tweaking I'm sure it's possible to squeeze out a bit more. I was just merely saying that the benchmark the OP referred to is completely wrong.
Ey, mine is bigger !!
But mine is thicker !!
By the end of the day few more or less frames per second won't make much difference but if you want enjoy Gear VR than only Snapdragon version is supported so far.
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
One thing to consider is that this article was released june 2014. This is way before it was released. In the article it state the snapdragon has a quad 2.5ghz processor but was reased with a 2.7ghz. If you want to know who's is bigger and who's is thicker you need to test them now and both plane stock roms out of the box.
Lodix said:
Ey, mine is bigger !!
But mine is thicker !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Latest trend is big and thin
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
gekkehenkie11 said:
But you are damned to run Touchwiz. We snapdragon guys are on CM12 and it's getting pretty damn stable already Needless to say it blows Touchwiz totally out of the water in terms of performance, fluidness and overal responsiveness. Ah and I noted 20%-30% faster NAND throughput times, not sure if that's due to Lollipop (ah yeah, forgot you guys are still waiting for Samsung to release lollipop, haha)
BTW, I didnt optimize anything at all, just benchmarked out of the box Touchwiz, as shipped. With tweaking I'm sure it's possible to squeeze out a bit more. I was just merely saying that the benchmark the OP referred to is completely wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is that working with the S Pen?
rsd2000 said:
How is that working with the S Pen?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It works Yeah I've read that a lot here "but I will lose the s-pen when flashing custom ROM". No you will not !! Not sure why people think that, maybe they think that because it's a samsung feature it's impossible to support on a non-samsung system ? Since Samsung is using the linux kernel, they are bound by law to release all drivers. So they did, including the s-pen, so it's supported out of the box on any custom ROM !
All you need to do is download the 'markers' app from the store and after you've installed it, you have an s-pen sketch board, and after that it just works on everything else too (on the CM12 interface etc) , including air support (no need to touch the display).
The only detail that I don't like too much is the pointer itself. On stock it's a small dot, via markers it's like a mouse pointer. However I read yesterday that people are working to change the pointer, it's possible via an overlay. But then again, it's not bothering me much anyway.
gekkehenkie11 said:
It works Yeah I've read that a lot here "but I will lose the s-pen when flashing custom ROM". No you will not !! Not sure why people think that, maybe they think that because it's a samsung feature it's impossible to support on a non-samsung system ? Since Samsung is using the linux kernel, they are bound by law to release all drivers. So they did, including the s-pen, so it's supported out of the box on any custom ROM !
All you need to do is download the 'markers' app from the store and after you've installed it, you have an s-pen sketch board, and after that it just works on everything else too (on the CM12 interface etc) , including air support (no need to touch the display).
The only detail that I don't like too much is the pointer itself. On stock it's a small dot, via markers it's like a mouse pointer. However I read yesterday that people are working to change the pointer, it's possible via an overlay. But then again, it's not bothering me much anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"... You had my curiosity. But now you have my attention..."
Now that sounds awesome, thanks for informing us.