Yes, as you can see samsung ditched their exynos processor for snap dragon 801 and it is a super great news.. you all please post your opinions..
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
And they ditched Wolfson too.
BaronInkjet said:
And they ditched Wolfson too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that leads to tremendous dissapointment! hah
NoteboyTech said:
And that leads to tremendous dissapointment! hah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absent a real home run, they would not get my business again. And that clearly didn't happen.
NoteboyTech said:
Yes, as you can see samsung ditched their exynos processor for snap dragon 801 and it is a super great news.. you all please post your opinions..
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't even know if the Exynos Infinity is a processor or not. LOL
dandroid13 said:
You don't even know if the Exynos Infinity is a processor or not. LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what exynos infinity is.
I was happy for snapdragon so that LTE is confirmed and we can have more love from the developers...
You know s4 i9500 didnt have lot of love from devs...
Yet a 64 bit octacore exynos infinity would have been ground breaking
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
NoteboyTech said:
I know what exynos infinity is.
I was happy for snapdragon so that LTE is confirmed and we can have more love from the developers...
You know s4 i9500 didnt have lot of love from devs...
Yet a 64 bit octacore exynos infinity would have been ground breaking
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon is only good if you're looking for AOSP, all major custom ROMs are there for the Exynos S4 like Omega and Wanam. So what is the Exynos Infinity?
Bro, I know that's why I said the developer love! yet see there is no 4g on i9500 and sm-n900 the s4 and note 3 so in the end if you own a superspeedy device you would require a super speedy internet! so for the sake of 4g I am praising the snapdragon! nevertheless you post your opinion! Explain us about exynos infinity"processor"
I read somewhere that they ate thinking of exynos version.
Sent from Note 3 (The beauty & beast)
Exynos infinity was a god damn tagline, not a processor. Stop reading BS sites.
No it didnt ditch exynos 2.1ghz.. bencchmark topper will come
sent via Samsung Galaxy S4 i9500
http://www.engadget.com/2014/02/25/samsung-galaxy-s5-octo-core/
Don't know if it's Exynos Infinity, but Samsung never claimed that Infinity would be coming to the S5. Infinity probably doesn't even have the yields yet to be used.
Well that was fast. Samsung already updated and removed the octo core version.
vbetts said:
http://www.engadget.com/2014/02/25/samsung-galaxy-s5-octo-core/
Don't know if it's Exynos Infinity, but Samsung never claimed that Infinity would be coming to the S5. Infinity probably doesn't even have the yields yet to be used.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos "infinity" is not the name of a processor(or lineup) again,it may be called something else (GH7 was something leaks were pointing out at,but nothing definite as such)
i9100g user said:
Exynos "infinity" is not the name of a processor(or lineup) again,it may be called something else (GH7 was something leaks were pointing out at,but nothing definite as such)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So then Infinity was just the name of the event for Exynos?
Not like it matters either way, Exynos yields recently weren't high enough to take to other parts of the world.
NoteboyTech said:
No it didnt ditch exynos 2.1ghz.. bencchmark topper will come
sent via Samsung Galaxy S4 i9500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos 5422 (2.1ghz A15s ,A7s at 1.5ghz?)
What about GPU? 628 or 678 they will need to improve their GPU performance to match the performance of adreno 330 in snapdragon variant (so a higher clocked 628 or 678)
A15 cores running at 2.1GHz yeah it will either melt ur device or it will suck the battery in very fast time , and probably its stuck with the ****ing clusters migration with NO GTS :|
so probably the Snap 801 will be better
and the funny thing Samsung didn't mention anything about GS5 with Exynos ( seems they are ashamed with their processor )
Related
This phone has the potential to be a beast. This has nothing to with the Evo 3D but you might as well read up a bit while you guys wait for ICS.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/lg-optimus-4x-hd-unveiled-quad-core-tegra-3-ice-cream-sandwich/
Damn, this phone looks like it will raise the bar for all the other phones, just like the Evo 4G did.
4.7 inch, HD (could be higher def), quad core - the perfect phone for mobile gaming
Pretty much. I think it will need a bigger battery. 2000+ or whatever won't cut it.
That phone does indeed look like a beast, and I look forward to MWC 2012, where I hope that HTC can deliver an equally beastly phone
Funny thing is, with all the negativity surrounding its predecessor, the Optimus 2X, previous owners are highly skeptical lol. They hate LG with a passion.
Sent from my Galaxy SII
Not impressed
Sent from my mean EVO 3d
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/lgs-upcoming-mwc-lineup-runs-into-some-italians-gets-documente/
engadget just dropped a video looks so smooth its in italian thou lol
im digging it so far. only thing im waiting to see is if a quad core a15 chip gets dropped at MWC. the tegra 3 is nice and im sure the exynos quad core will be very nice but they r both a9's. i believe the dual core a15's match up or beat the a9 quad cores so imagine an a15 quad core dont take my word for it thou haha im pretty sure i read that somewhere
only a couple days left cant wait. ill most likely get a dual core a15 over a tegra 3 need to see how they stack up next to each other!
swaze said:
Not impressed
Sent from my mean EVO 3d
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep... Pretty much
dylan6879 said:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/lgs-upcoming-mwc-lineup-runs-into-some-italians-gets-documente/
engadget just dropped a video looks so smooth its in italian thou lol
im digging it so far. only thing im waiting to see is if a quad core a15 chip gets dropped at MWC. the tegra 3 is nice and im sure the exynos quad core will be very nice but they r both a9's. i believe the dual core a15's match up or beat the a9 quad cores so imagine an a15 quad core dont take my word for it thou haha im pretty sure i read that somewhere
only a couple days left cant wait. ill most likely get a dual core a15 over a tegra 3 need to see how they stack up next to each other!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Texas instruments just showcased dualcore A15 omap.it beats the tegra 3 and its just clocked at 800mhz.so imagine a 2ghz one.
Full article here
http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
josephnero said:
Texas instruments just showcased dualcore A15 omap.it beats the tegra 3 and its just clocked at 800mhz.so imagine a 2ghz one.
Full article here
http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha yeah I thought so. That's insane can't wait to see these things fly I'll be skipping the whole quad core trend for one of these unless of course there happens to be some magical quad core a15. Performance over big numbers haha.. hope Sprint shows something off at MWC even thou they normally don't.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
dylan6879 said:
Ha yeah I thought so. That's insane can't wait to see these things fly I'll be skipping the whole quad core trend for one of these unless of course there happens to be some magical quad core a15. Performance over big numbers haha.. hope Sprint shows something off at MWC even thou they normally don't.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have fun waiting till Q1 2013.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
I haven't heard anything about a microsd card in this thing yet. Am I missing something or does that seem to be the case? I don't want anything to do with a phone that doesn't have microsd.
Sent from my Shooter using xda premium
swaze said:
have fun waiting till Q1 2013.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well now i meant an a15 processor TI isnt the only company announcing them. wait now that i look r they i thought there was more? what is the new sanpdragon krait based on? someone knowledgable chime in pls! and for the moment i dont mind waiting haha my 3d is still perfect in my eyes im just a tech junkie and whenever there is something new i either sell mine or hand it on down in the family and jump on the newest
wish it was as easy to do with my car
dylan6879 said:
well now i meant an a15 processor TI isnt the only company announcing them. wait now that i look r they i thought there was more? what is the new sanpdragon krait based on? someone knowledgable chime in pls! and for the moment i dont mind waiting haha my 3d is still perfect in my eyes im just a tech junkie and whenever there is something new i either sell mine or hand it on down in the family and jump on the newest
wish it was as easy to do with my car
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure Qualcomm's S4 chips r A15 based, also being built with 28nm processing...that's where the difference is being seen. Smaller chips much more efficient in the end.
What's funny is Samsung is going to be showing off their new chips at MWC and they only went down to 32nm with A9 cores for the quad chip shown on engadget...
Thought it was a tad odd though Samsung only making it to 32nm while everyone else is pushing for 28nm and lower. Hell Intel stated they are shooting for 14nm at CES if i remember right! They will be one to keep an eye on in the long run. Imho
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Garbage
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D using XDA App
sgt. slaughter said:
Pretty sure Qualcomm's S4 chips r A15 based, also being built with 28nm processing...that's where the difference is being seen. Smaller chips much more efficient in the end.
What's funny is Samsung is going to be showing off their new chips at MWC and they only went down to 32nm with A9 cores for the quad chip shown on engadget...
Thought it was a tad odd though Samsung only making it to 32nm while everyone else is pushing for 28nm and lower. Hell Intel stated they are shooting for 14nm at CES if i remember right! They will be one to keep an eye on in the long run. Imho
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i thought the snapdragon s4 was but i wasnt sure, tried to search it and couldnt find anywere that mentions its an a15 although im sure it is. was thinking the same thing as i read that everyone is going to 28nm and samsung of everyone is only going down to 32nm but u know it will be a very nice one.
definitely need to keep an eye on intel i havent been impressed with what theyve shown off so far but them being intel they have the background and resources to make some serious competition around here. 14nm is crazy mwc hasnt even started and i cant wait for ces..
sgt. slaughter said:
Pretty sure Qualcomm's S4 chips r A15 based, also being built with 28nm processing...that's where the difference is being seen. Smaller chips much more efficient in the end.
What's funny is Samsung is going to be showing off their new chips at MWC and they only went down to 32nm with A9 cores for the quad chip shown on engadget...
Thought it was a tad odd though Samsung only making it to 32nm while everyone else is pushing for 28nm and lower. Hell Intel stated they are shooting for 14nm at CES if i remember right! They will be one to keep an eye on in the long run. Imho
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read in andtech that S4 is modified architecture with a performance between A9 and A15.still sounds awesome
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
That video was impressive. But I don't like lg phones....
Sent from my EVO 3D with ViperROM via XDA premium app
z50king said:
That video was impressive. But I don't like lg phones....
Sent from my EVO 3D with ViperROM via XDA premium app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here bro.i never trust LG
josephnero said:
I read in andtech that S4 is modified architecture with a performance between A9 and A15.still sounds awesome
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah your right to an extent but its NOT "between" them its inline with A15 if not better...the write up at anandtech.com about the new S4's benchmarking is really well done. As are their other write ups concerning the chip.
...Qualcomm, unlike most ARM chip makers, does not license the architecture for its application processors directly from ARM Holdings. Instead, it designs its own cores in-house and simply licenses the ARM instruction set. At the most basic level, Qualcomm’s Krait core is more advanced than Cortex-A9, the current standard from ARM, and it may even best the next-generation Cortex-A15 core....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.extremetech.com/computin...ragon-s4-has-the-competition-on-the-defensive
Here you go, I made a quick video for Antutu X Benchmark between both devices ( Snap and Exynos )
Lets guess which device ( which CPU ) on left and right while watching this clip and then you have your answer.
Video was captured with an iphone 5 ( YEAH I know, Samsung is gonna be p*ssed LOL ).
Enjoy!
That answers my question somewhat, so the 5422 has a slight edge on the first benchmark, yet lost the second ,making it 1 to 1, but the s801 finished the test first on both testes.
Sent from my LG-D959 using Tapatalk
Are all 8 cores running on the 5422 version?
Wow, you really have both version?
Please make full comparison especially speed/tw , battery and camera.
Sent from my GT-I9500
BoneXDA said:
Are all 8 cores running on the 5422 version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont think so. Maybe the 64 bit will
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
copualt3 said:
That answers my question somewhat, so the 5422 has a slight edge on the first benchmark, yet lost the second ,making it 1 to 1, but the s801 finished the test first on both testes.
Sent from my LG-D959 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 5422 in general i felt very very smooth. major problem is still there: its hot!
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
leoaudio13 said:
I dont think so. Maybe the 64 bit will
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting... in Barcelona Samsung announced that the 5422 will support Heterogeneous Multi Processing allowing all 8 cores to run if necessary. The Note 3 Neo's 5260 can run all 6, so the S5 5422 may need an update, or benchmark tools need it, what do you think, @AndreiLux?
BoneXDA said:
Interesting... in Barcelona Samsung announced that the 5422 will support Heterogeneous Multi Processing allowing all 8 cores to run if necessary. The Note 3 Neo's 5260 can run all 6, so the S5 5422 may need an update, or benchmark tools need it, what do you think, @AndreiLux?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a chance to played with it for half a day but its damn hot while running bench. not so sure if it ran with all eight cores at once. Gotta check again 2mo. But imo, the Exynos is very smooth. But the camera on Exynos version is not so good. Dont know why Even i took a few shots and compare with the LG G2, the G2 beats it with much better quality
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
leoaudio13 said:
I got a chance to played with it for half a day but its damn hot while running bench. not so sure if it ran with all eight cores at once. Gotta check again 2mo. But imo, the Exynos is very smooth. But the camera on Exynos version is not so good. Dont know why Even i took a few shots and compare with the LG G2, the G2 beats it with much better quality
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you say the camera on the Exynos is better?
Also how about the headphone sound quality, any differences, if so which sounds better
BoneXDA said:
Interesting... in Barcelona Samsung announced that the 5422 will support Heterogeneous Multi Processing allowing all 8 cores to run if necessary. The Note 3 Neo's 5260 can run all 6, so the S5 5422 may need an update, or benchmark tools need it, what do you think, @AndreiLux?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's running HMP...
AndreiLux said:
It's running HMP...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi sir,
Then are you gonna support it...I mean Exynos ver. Now its prefect to add your tweaks in it
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Right now honestly HMP seems a bit far-fetched. Most app developers don't even use more than 1 thread for their apps. Waste of battery imo.
AndreiLux said:
It's running HMP...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you Andrei! So can it run all 8 cores right now, does it depend on Samsung or the apps?
degast said:
Right now honestly HMP seems a bit far-fetched. Most app developers don't even use more than 1 thread for their apps. Waste of battery imo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The point of HMP is load balancing between the cores. It still has advantages even in low threaded apps. The cores are powered off when not doing anything.
BoneXDA said:
Thank you Andrei! So can it run all 8 cores right now, does it depend on Samsung or the apps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends on nothing specifically. If load is sufficiently high and threaded it'll use all 8.
I think Antutu is finishing the tests slower than the Snapdragon because it's dispatching twice the threads and doing twice the work, it would score higher if it actually didn't do that.
And no I'm not getting it, the S5 will be outdated in a few months.
AndreiLux said:
The point of HMP is load balancing between the cores. It still has advantages even in low threaded apps. The cores are powered off when not doing anything.
It depends on nothing specifically. If load is sufficiently high and threaded it'll use all 8.
I think Antutu is finishing the tests slower than the Snapdragon because it's dispatching twice the threads and doing twice the work, it would score higher if it actually didn't do that.
And no I'm not getting it, the S5 will be outdated in a few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its coming up for real, the F
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
AndreiLux said:
The point of HMP is load balancing between the cores. It still has advantages even in low threaded apps. The cores are powered off when not doing anything.
It depends on nothing specifically. If load is sufficiently high and threaded it'll use all 8.
I think Antutu is finishing the tests slower than the Snapdragon because it's dispatching twice the threads and doing twice the work, it would score higher if it actually didn't do that.
And no I'm not getting it, the S5 will be outdated in a few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also found that the HMP wherether its running or not, its not so right. Even though its very smooth, but well, its not so different from the 801 version. Also its HOT. I just felt its incompleted
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
leoaudio13 said:
I also found that the HMP wherether its running or not, its not so right. Even though its very smooth, but well, its not so different from the 801 version. Also its HOT. I just felt its incompleted
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on the thermal throttling settings between the two, Samsung changed the limits several times on both versions of the S4 so expect the same to happen here.
AndreiLux said:
Depends on the thermal throttling settings between the two, Samsung changed the limits several times on both versions of the S4 so expect the same to happen here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably we have to wait for S6 for the HMP to mature also we'll for your support as well Andrei :good:
leoaudio13 said:
Its coming up for real, the F
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean the Galaxy F?
This could be it I think: http://www.sammobile.com/2014/04/03/samsung-sm-g906s-with-qhd-2560x1440-screen-appears-in-benchmark/
0mega007 said:
So you say the camera on the Exynos is better?
Also how about the headphone sound quality, any differences, if so which sounds better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the same for both models really. Sound quality is the same, still Samsung quality. But both have AptX so it wont be a big problem Both external speakers are the same, 1 word: shjt! I wish the speakers werent in the back
Hey Guys,
Here's my take on the Samsung Galaxy S5... spent close to 72 hours to get this done, hope someone finds it useful...
Thanks for your time and feedbacks welcome
Ash
Was waiting for a review from you man! :good:
Awesome review!
But I have to disagree with what you said about the Exynos not having any major changes. Most of the changes are under the hood as @AndreiLux said and it is still as powerful(if not, more powerful) than the Snapdragon 801 as seen from benchmarks. Only disappointing thing about the Exynos chipset is the lack of LTE.
And also, Samsung removed all the benchmark boosting code in the Kitkat update. So, the benchmark results will not be "fake".
Thanks buddy I'm gonna add it to the review thread!!!
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
This is awesome. One of the best review I've seen.
system.img said:
Was waiting for a review from you man! :good:
Awesome review!
But I have to disagree with what you said about the Exynos not having any major changes. Most of the changes are under the hood as @AndreiLux said and it is still as powerful(if not, more powerful) than the Snapdragon 801 as seen from benchmarks. Only disappointing thing about the Exynos chipset is the lack of LTE.
And also, Samsung removed all the benchmark boosting code in the Kitkat update. So, the benchmark results will not be "fake".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
or maybe they have a better way to cover up #conspiracies
barondebxl said:
Thanks buddy I'm gonna add it to the review thread!!!
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks m8 really appreciate it
hemander said:
This is awesome. One of the best review I've seen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks buddy
ashwin123 said:
or maybe they have a better way to cover up #conspiracies
Thanks m8 really appreciate it
Thanks buddy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course buddy, been subscribed to your channel for years! And I suggest everyone else to subscribed as well
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
I'm not a registered youtube user but I'll give you a thanks here, because the amount of work and dedication some of you are putting into your yt videos is simply amazing.
Overall a great video some things I wanted to add (tried the phone yesterday):
1. TouchWiz blazing fast ? Sadly that wasn't my experience for sure it's far from slow but to me it seemed like the microlags increased quite a bit
2. Exynos ..well personally I'd take 8 over 4 cores sadly not available in Austria
3. Performance: as a non handygamer you just have proven my deepest fears, 2 gig of RAM simply aren't enough for flawless multitasking. The Z 2 should handle that much better although maybe even 3 gigs aren't enough.
4. fully agree on the bloat thing, that's why root as always is a must for me.
5. thanks for the great review
Im abit of a heavy gamer, run social-holic apps and do some web browsing. Are either of this phone good for my requirements? The I9305 cost as much as the S4 Mini in my country so deciding between these is tough thanks
Sent from my GT-S6500D using XDA Free mobile app
comparing devices/roms/softwares isn't allowed in XDA i think you will have no answer till mod come here and close thread.
Lil Geeky said:
comparing devices/roms/softwares isn't allowed in XDA i think you will have no answer till mod come here and close thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can compare devices AFAIK. Im not sure about ROMs though but i think theres tons of ROM comparison videos at YouTube
Via the Internet
Lil Geeky said:
comparing devices/roms/softwares isn't allowed in XDA i think you will have no answer till mod come here and close thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mini!!!:good:
TiTAN-O-One said:
Im abit of a heavy gamer, run social-holic apps and do some web browsing. Are either of this phone good for my requirements? The I9305 cost as much as the S4 Mini in my country so deciding between these is tough thanks
Sent from my GT-S6500D using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say the I9305, mainly because of the screen and the RAM, i think the S4 mini is too small but that depends on what you like, for specs you can look here:
http://versus.com/nl/samsung-galaxy-i9305-s3-lte-vs-samsung-galaxy-s4-mini
SamC95 said:
I would say the I9305, mainly because of the screen and the RAM, i think the S4 mini is too small but that depends on what you like, for specs you can look here:
http://versus.com/nl/samsung-galaxy-i9305-s3-lte-vs-samsung-galaxy-s4-mini
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Specs is what I'm concerned about. Other people say even though the S4 Mini is a Dual-core device, it still outperform the S3 LTE in benchmarks in Antutu.
Also, the screen res is a plus too. qHD vs HD resolution.
Via the Internet
TiTAN-O-One said:
Specs is what I'm concerned about. Other people say even though the S4 Mini is a Dual-core device, it still outperform the S3 LTE in benchmarks in Antutu.
Also, the screen res is a plus too. qHD vs HD resolution.
Via the Internet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm that´s weird. Well if you look at the link you see there are very few (good) points for the S4 mini, so when talking specs you should probably choose the S34G. My sister has the S4 mini and it´s a lot slower, and the screen is (in my opinion) not better when using it.
Mini is sheet. Why? Mini is mini. S3 will be always S3. Buy S III but i9300 for better ROMs and developers
SamC95 said:
Hm that´s weird. Well if you look at the link you see there are very few (good) points for the S4 mini, so when talking specs you should probably choose the S34G. My sister has the S4 mini and it´s a lot slower, and the screen is (in my opinion) not better when using it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did she install CM11? One of my xda friend had CM11 on his device and gave him a +2000 on his Antutu Benchmark. Usually he got was just 18000 pts. Now 20000.
Via the Internet
Minto107 said:
Mini is sheet. Why? Mini is mini. S3 will be always S3. Buy S III but i9300 for better ROMs and developers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I seriously agree with you hands down. I may have to look at some kernels you guys have. I like UV and then OC devices i use. Its just so that i save more battery while still having good (if not better) perfomance
Via the Internet
TiTAN-O-One said:
I seriously agree with you hands down. I may have to look at some kernels you guys have. I like UV and then OC devices i use. Its just so that i save more battery while still having good (if not better) perfomance
Via the Internet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S III International has for example S5 ROMs(Lite and full), S4/N3 ROMs, official support from Cyanogen Mod(I had HTC One S C2 before and I know how it is when you have less popular variant of phone). Might S III LTE has LTE and 2x more RAM but I've chosen International edition and I'm happy with that
TiTAN-O-One said:
Did she install CM11? One of my xda friend had CM11 on his device and gave him a +2000 on his Antutu Benchmark. Usually he got was just 18000 pts. Now 20000.
Via the Internet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh no way, my sister doesn´t care about things like that, she´s completely stock
Minto107 said:
S III International has for example S5 ROMs(Lite and full), S4/N3 ROMs, official support from Cyanogen Mod(I had HTC One S C2 before and I know how it is when you have less popular variant of phone). Might S III LTE has LTE and 2x more RAM but I've chosen International edition and I'm happy with that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I own a HTC One S C2 too! Well, it got hard bricked for some reason (didn't detect my device as QDL).
Anyways, if everything's fine, i might go for the SIII LTE
Via the Internet
I liked Sense 6 Prism on it
S3 LTE all the way. Just the bigger screen is enough reason to pick it.
LTE all the way here too, especially as there are so many excellent roms and tweaks already.
As we already know that in cpu exynod version wins the snapdragon loses
same here with gpu the exynos version has mali t760 wins and beats snapdragon andreno 450
here is the http://www.androidauthority.com/galaxy-note-4-exynos-5433-vs-snapdragon-805-395820/
Adreno 450? Wow
Texted from Note 4
bala_gamer said:
Adreno 450? Wow
Texted from Note 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
This is from june.
Iyrah said:
As we already know that in cpu exynod version wins the snapdragon loses
same here with gpu the exynos version has mali t760 wins and beats snapdragon andreno 450
here is the http://www.androidauthority.com/galaxy-note-4-exynos-5433-vs-snapdragon-805-395820/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what the hell they did, but I'm getting 47068 on ATU with my 910F/snapdragon 805
I got 49900 on exynos
Iyrah said:
I got 49900 on exynos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i got infinity on snapdragon
here is you place
Note: most people here know exynos has the upper hand in overall comparison with sd805
Iyrah said:
I got 49900 on exynos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But you are damned to run Touchwiz. We snapdragon guys are on CM12 and it's getting pretty damn stable already Needless to say it blows Touchwiz totally out of the water in terms of performance, fluidness and overal responsiveness. Ah and I noted 20%-30% faster NAND throughput times, not sure if that's due to Lollipop (ah yeah, forgot you guys are still waiting for Samsung to release lollipop, haha)
BTW, I didnt optimize anything at all, just benchmarked out of the box Touchwiz, as shipped. With tweaking I'm sure it's possible to squeeze out a bit more. I was just merely saying that the benchmark the OP referred to is completely wrong.
Ey, mine is bigger !!
But mine is thicker !!
By the end of the day few more or less frames per second won't make much difference but if you want enjoy Gear VR than only Snapdragon version is supported so far.
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
One thing to consider is that this article was released june 2014. This is way before it was released. In the article it state the snapdragon has a quad 2.5ghz processor but was reased with a 2.7ghz. If you want to know who's is bigger and who's is thicker you need to test them now and both plane stock roms out of the box.
Lodix said:
Ey, mine is bigger !!
But mine is thicker !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Latest trend is big and thin
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
gekkehenkie11 said:
But you are damned to run Touchwiz. We snapdragon guys are on CM12 and it's getting pretty damn stable already Needless to say it blows Touchwiz totally out of the water in terms of performance, fluidness and overal responsiveness. Ah and I noted 20%-30% faster NAND throughput times, not sure if that's due to Lollipop (ah yeah, forgot you guys are still waiting for Samsung to release lollipop, haha)
BTW, I didnt optimize anything at all, just benchmarked out of the box Touchwiz, as shipped. With tweaking I'm sure it's possible to squeeze out a bit more. I was just merely saying that the benchmark the OP referred to is completely wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is that working with the S Pen?
rsd2000 said:
How is that working with the S Pen?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It works Yeah I've read that a lot here "but I will lose the s-pen when flashing custom ROM". No you will not !! Not sure why people think that, maybe they think that because it's a samsung feature it's impossible to support on a non-samsung system ? Since Samsung is using the linux kernel, they are bound by law to release all drivers. So they did, including the s-pen, so it's supported out of the box on any custom ROM !
All you need to do is download the 'markers' app from the store and after you've installed it, you have an s-pen sketch board, and after that it just works on everything else too (on the CM12 interface etc) , including air support (no need to touch the display).
The only detail that I don't like too much is the pointer itself. On stock it's a small dot, via markers it's like a mouse pointer. However I read yesterday that people are working to change the pointer, it's possible via an overlay. But then again, it's not bothering me much anyway.
gekkehenkie11 said:
It works Yeah I've read that a lot here "but I will lose the s-pen when flashing custom ROM". No you will not !! Not sure why people think that, maybe they think that because it's a samsung feature it's impossible to support on a non-samsung system ? Since Samsung is using the linux kernel, they are bound by law to release all drivers. So they did, including the s-pen, so it's supported out of the box on any custom ROM !
All you need to do is download the 'markers' app from the store and after you've installed it, you have an s-pen sketch board, and after that it just works on everything else too (on the CM12 interface etc) , including air support (no need to touch the display).
The only detail that I don't like too much is the pointer itself. On stock it's a small dot, via markers it's like a mouse pointer. However I read yesterday that people are working to change the pointer, it's possible via an overlay. But then again, it's not bothering me much anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"... You had my curiosity. But now you have my attention..."
Now that sounds awesome, thanks for informing us.