Database Develop

[General] [Q&A] Cyanogen Mod 9 Beta 4 For GT-S5570 : For all your questions.

Hello galaxy mini users,
Thankfully, Maclaw and his team are considering their development of Galaxy ICS for Galaxy Mini too and as a result we will soon get Beta 4 of latest ICS based CM9 custom rom.
You can find detailed info at this thread :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1539642
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I created this thread so that all users can express their happiness and share their joy with others. Want to say thanks, or ask questions, then please post there.
Help Keep the Development thread clean so that it will be easier for everyone to find latest information and hear latest news from the developers.
Cheers!

Placeholder!

Finally we are going to get beta 4 form Maclaw with majors fixes like camera and deep sleep.thanks Maclaw in advance.

Excited
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium

tnx
tnx for this thread!>;]

I'm wondering when will USB Tethering, Wifi Hotspot & USB storage mounting be merged into CM9...

eksdiey said:
tnx for this thread!>;]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mention not...
Lion_Heart9x said:
I'm wondering when will USB Tethering, Wifi Hotspot & USB storage mounting be merged into CM9...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry... I am foreseeing it being already fixed. It's just a matter of some time.

Radio
is not mentioned even radio
but i don't care
thanks maclaw

I've read about this beta 4 on its original thread, and looks like everything is really works.
but where's the download link?
Really eager to try it.

So, as i understand - games performance in ICS will be same as in Gingerbread?
Sent from my piece of **** using Tapatalk.

I don't think it has been uploaded yet. Really excited though.

kernel 3.0
Hi,
I wanted to know from the developers wether this is based on kernel 2.6.x or on kernel 3.x
I ask this beacuse I'm aware that it is not possible to compile the linux 3.x kernel for the armv6 architecture, but googling around I found that a patch has been created for the raspberry pi motherboard (which too integrates an armv6-compatible processor)
Here are some links:
SORRY BUT I CAN'T PUT EXTERNAL LINKS YET
(just google "Linux Kernel 3.1.9 for Raspberry Pi Released & Build Instructions")
Allright, the android kernel is highly customised, though, who knows, maybe this could help us galaxy mini users too!!

Maclaw is going to upload Beta4 today. Hope to use a stable Cm9.
Sorry, my English is not good

Please redirect to this thread.
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1541074
No point on having two of the same topic
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

PORT 3.X Kernel from Maclaw Studio :)

Hello to all,
The Maclawstudio have announced that they are working on kernel 3.0 for galaxy Ace / Gio.
All those who are interested to port this kernel by Ace / Gio in galaxy mini, please contact me.
I do not think it will be so difficult
Please contact me(pm) :highfive:
greetings
Ma-90 @

Request
Can u also port his cm10.1.

Venomstar said:
Can u also port his cm10.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but I do not think there is a need for mini already there

reported .....mods may close this thread..
and dude if you want help goto either general or q and a section.....
post here only when you are done with the project..

Nice idea.. i would really like to join you in that.. but, i hv no time till 16th may..
Can I join you after my exam which will end on 16th may. ?

OJ said:
Nice idea.. i would really like to join you in that.. but, i hv no time till 16th may..
Can I join you after my exam which will end on 16th may. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ofcourse

MaclawStudio just takes psyke83's work and again saying it's his. What a tool - same for everything else - taken from androidarmv6. And people still download his builds. Pathetic. Then keeps everything closed source (even the kernel, lol) so nobody can see that. x) Just haven't got enough words to describe this "developer"

i dont care if its stolen, remaked, rearanged, modified, etc...the truth is gonna come along with punishment (sound like Jehova whitness), as long as this 3 kernel works...

I don't know if you're aware of that, but erikcas is working on it since the day psyke83 ported it. He never brags about it. The problem is that Ace/Gio/Mini/Fit uses closed source FSR drivers which don't work on 3.x kernel (yet)

TheWhisp said:
I don't know if you're aware of that, but erikcas is working on it since the day psyke83 ported it. He never brags about it. The problem is that Ace/Gio/Mini/Fit uses closed source FSR drivers which don't work on 3.x kernel (yet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it is not necessary to port kernel since Erikcas already is working on it right?

Erikcas has been working on it for months. Galaxy 5 uses older FSR drivers which have open source package or SDK, not sure. The problem is that Mini/Ace/Gio/Fit uses newer version and that open source package is not working.

TheWhisp said:
Erikcas has been working on it for months. Galaxy 5 uses older FSR drivers which have open source package or SDK, not sure. The problem is that Mini/Ace/Gio/Fit uses newer version and that open source package is not working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But if maclawstudio kernel port about Ace / Gio you can use them on our FSR galy mini, right?

Yes

I only leave this here:

bgm92 said:
Just shut up! Maclaw offered us more stable builds than you or other devs ever did! Show a little respect and stop denigrating him because he did a better job than you!
I really hope Maclaw won't release 3.x kernel sources so you won't steal his work and port it to other phones.
__________________________________________________
And one another important thing! How can you tell us he stoke psyke83's work? From where do you know? Have you got any proofs? How can you just speak like that? Again, just shut up - like a romanian proverb says: If you would shut up, you would remained a philosopher...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
News flash bro ....Ever tried erikcas's builds please do if you didn't they are the most stable ones available.
also maclaw can/most likely isnt working on a source port for ace/gio but the truth of the matter is that would be sheer waste of time.Psyke83 already did the work,erikcas and wayland ace ported it to gio and ace respectively(they added their defconfigs and nessary parts) so it would be foolish of maclaw to start from scratch.
Also lets clarify he may/most likely is Kanging erikcas , wayland ace and psyke83 's work but since its open to all to build its not actually stealing(provided he gives credit but thats just good manners).
also the fsr module is a proprietary module(source code is not available) the one that psyke83 is using was leaked via a galaxy5 eclair kernel sources and still contained proprietary blobs(possibly that's the problem area).
Erikcas spent about what 3-4 months 14 hrs a day on the kernel trying all permutations and combinations but was not successful so ....you realize if i show doubt to maclaws possiblity of fixing it(nonetheless miracles happen).
PS reported you.(for starting a possible flame war).
PPS also maclaw still breaks the gpl by distributiing a closed source kernel based on opensourced resources(its still linux).
---------- Post added at 07:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:21 PM ----------
marcin1147 said:
I only leave this here:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
knock knock ....correction Erikcas and psyke83's not TheWhisp.

Dark Passenger said:
Erikcas spent about what 3-4 months 14 hrs a day on the kernel trying all permutations and combinations but was not successful so ....you realize if i show doubt to maclaws possiblity of fixing it(nonetheless miracles happen)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
COOL STORY BRO
*click*
BTW. Maybe you don't know but our sources are here: https://github.com/MaclawStudio/aosp_kernel

Also the fact that maclaw asked for donations to buy a galaxy mini....
many people trusted him and donated..
and when there was enough he betrayed by stopping development and not using the money what it was meant for ...
most people argue that he promised but as always there is no proof or a written agreement or contract and thus the money donated with trust of further development of various development was pocketed...
I am not blaming or accusing anyone of anything but just stating the facts that i know..

hsay said:
Also the fact that maclaw asked for donations to buy a galaxy mini.... many people trusted him and donated..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maclaw told me that nobody has donated.

and you believed?
anyway lets stop the discussion right here...
if maclaw comes back for development i dont have any problems...
he is welcome anytime

Please, stop this stupid arguing.
I know a lot of people hates me here, I don't care.
Just relax, let every developer like erikcas, TheWhisp etc. do their bests without fighting.
Maybe our device sources are closed, but we've to share kernel sources. If we do 3.x kernel, we'll have to share sources aswell.
Erickas will make 3.x? Great, every Samsung device with msm7x27 will be able to use it with mention that it's ported by him.
We will make 3.x? Great, as up. We must to share kernel sources when we release it.
What a difference?

[Q] CM 10.2

Hi All,
I remember that we will not be receiving next major version of Android by CM becoz of lack of NEON instructions. I only wonder, if we will still get CM 10.2 or our last version will be CM 10.1.
Can anybody with CM insider knowledge answer?
I can only see that there was not created CM10.2 branches in our P990 github related repositories, which is bad sign to me.
Edit: Answer is Yes, CM10.1 is last version.

CM 10.1 seems to be the latest official version of cyanogenmod. But just look at all the gifted developers in the development thread. I guess someone will get it working on our device .
I think even some time ago pengus or tonyp mentioned that they like the challenge ....:thumbup:
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

Yes, I have read tonyp's thread and there was mentioned that CM team officially won't support 10.2 for our phone. But I hope Pengus and Tonyp will make something But it's quite possible that it will be a little bit unstable and glitchy...

p.valenta said:
Hi All,
I remember that we will not be receiving next major version of Android by CM becoz of lack of NEON instructions. I only wonder, if we will still get CM 10.2 or our last version will be CM 10.1.
Can anybody with CM insider knowledge answer?
I can only see that there was not created CM10.2 branches in our P990 github related repositories, which is bad sign to me.
Edit: Answer is Yes, CM10.1 is last version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope it isn't if you watch the developer thread you see cm10.2 only camera doesn't work yet but further it is smooth and stable i am posting this cause you may didn't see it

winstonxl2 said:
nope it isn't if you watch the developer thread you see cm10.2 only camera doesn't work yet but further it is smooth and stable i am posting this cause you may didn't see it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I know about it. But unfortunately it will not be official CM, only experimental.
It's great that there are still developers who want to keep our device up to date :fingers-crossed: , but looks like it's time to look around for next future device.

p.valenta said:
Thanks, I know about it. But unfortunately it will not be official CM, only experimental.
It's great that there are still developers who want to keep our device up to date :fingers-crossed: , but looks like it's time to look around for next future device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it isn't really experimental only the camera doesn't work and all cm10.1 bugs are included but cm10.2 is smoother and hdmi is partly fixed

[ROM][Port][Alpha 1] ParanoidAndroid

Hey all this threads made for developer who want to help me fix the bugs in this rom
Note: this builds only for expert only thats know how to logcat and fix the bugs when appears using this rom
Disclaimer:i will not take any responsibility for bricking your device this rom totaly ported to our ace soo do with ur own risk
You should be on my CM7 Specific basic kernel and on a CM7 RC4 Based ROM!!
Wipe everything - data, cahce and dalvik
Mount system
Install zip from sdcard - ROM
special thanks to:
bieltv3 for cm9 Alpha 1
NickHalden for panoroid rom
just a test if it works i will then update it to beta 1
download link
http://www.4shared.com/zip/Jgg-Hr5E/paranoid.html?

I can test for you later. Is it booting?
Enviado do Brasil
EDIT: I voted for not closing the thread. Why? Because when Cm7 was still on beta, ivchek said this, and i agree: these rom are good, so they deserve the paralel development.

hey
mathm2013 said:
I can test for you later. Is it booting?
Enviado do Brasil
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I dont have the device I ported this to Ace i cause i couldnt find this rom in the thread. So i need testers to test this

problem
sarmadulhaq said:
Actually I dont have the device I ported this to Ace i cause i couldnt find this rom in the thread. So i need testers to test this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
installation aborted !!

R u sure, try once more and if it doesn't work then i will port it again

sarmadulhaq said:
R u sure, try once more and if it doesn't work then i will port it again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i tried it twice same problem wait for any other users reply

sarmadulhaq said:
R u sure, try once more and if it doesn't work then i will port it again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not putting you down or anything, but there isn't really a need to port it. Nobody will use the Rom for now.
Sent from my Cosmic Ace-i

Actually, I would use the rom if it was based on beta 1, since the wifi works... At least he is trying to get some new things for ace i.
I was just about to port this But good job!

yeah, you need to port it again but this time using new CM build. Anyway: is there a sense to port ICS (cm9) based roms if there is no stable build for cooperve? Personally i think we should wait for RC version like CM7.2 by biel.

drumiec said:
yeah, you need to port it again but this time using new CM build. Anyway: is there a sense to port ICS (cm9) based roms if there is no stable build for cooperve? Personally i think we should wait for RC version like CM7.2 by biel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 i think we should wait for a rc release from biel. becuz i think noone wont use this rom. sorry. but anyway u r trying to give us something good.
Galaxy Pop Plus'ımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi.

Installation aborted...but Keep up the good work...
Love to see PA on our ace-i and ya!! as the other members suggested, better wait for RC release...

I think closing the thread waiting for a release candidate is not the thing to do. There's people that will use the ROM even with all the bugs and the lag, if it's present.

Please continue the rom it will take time but good things will happen here. I love pa and wish you the best in your work. Thank you bro.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

Just why do you want to port it instead of building it?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app

GT-af said:
Just why do you want to port it instead of building it?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A difference between porting and building, and if he did build it, it will never have hw and will be slow (due to the lack of GPU drivers)

Why so much hurry in making cm9 based roms..Let atleast stable version come..
My suggestion..Not discouraging you..But according to me wait for stable cm9..
Atleast Hit Thanx If I helped U-XDA Rule
Bootanimations for MDPI Devices
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2126329

Howdareme said:
A difference between porting and building, and if he did build it, it will never have hw and will be slow (due to the lack of GPU drivers)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will be as cm9, without difference of driver,if cm9 has driver PA Will also, porting create many little bugs, and paranoid is made to be built i think
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app

Howdareme said:
A difference between porting and building, and if he did build it, it will never have hw and will be slow (due to the lack of GPU drivers)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thing you said is absurd. Porting will create more bugs. And a port takes libs from base rom, so porting and building makes no difference at this point, but porting might create bugs as it was built for another device.
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app

[Vote]cm 9/10/10.1/10.2/11 (Stable)

Hey Guys
Some Time I have created a vote for official cm for our device bcm21553
So Please Can All Of You support our vote to Be heared I think They will respond to Us Hopefully want to share The Link To Vote Here
forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/89978-cm-91010110211stable-for-bcm21553-devices/

myaservip said:
Hey Guys
Some Time I have created a vote for official cm for our device bcm21553
So Please Can All Of You support our vote to Be heared I think They will respond to Us Hopefully want to share The Link To Vote Here
forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/89978-cm-91010110211stable-for-bcm21553-devices/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Had they wanted to create any official CM for us, it would already have been created. Our best hopes are placed on Bieltv.3's work.
btw, wrong section.
EDIT:
Oh, i said some **** here. CM couldn't have been developed by them because they (and us) didn't have the necessary drivers. Now it could be developed by them. But i don't see what could get their interests yet on this phone.

myaservip said:
Hey Guys
Some Time I have created a vote for official cm for our device bcm21553
So Please Can All Of You support our vote to Be heared I think They will respond to Us Hopefully want to share The Link To Vote Here
forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/89978-cm-91010110211stable-for-bcm21553-devices/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Request it at Mods to move this thread into General section.
EDIT: Oh yes, we don't get an official port CM. I think we will get unofficial only because we don't have properly true update for our phone. Bieltv.3 and SpaceCaker will do the hard working for port and they willing it supposed to do as monthly build. Due to initial driver, bieltv.3, SpaceCaker and BroadcomCM Team will not port CM higher than 4.0.4 because we don't get driver higher than ICS. We could having driver which support for ICS only. And I sure Broadcom will build new driver as soon as possible.

Please move [email protected]
Is Pressing Thanks Harder Than Writhing T-H-A-N-K!! So If U Like Press It

:thumbup:
Sent from my GT-S5830i using Tapatalk 2