Hi guys, I am just wondering what is the best kernel for the Nexus 4 Mako. I am looking to improve battery life and can you flash a kernel and stay with stock 4.4.2? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
There is no best kernel, every user's preference and usage are different. The best you can do is try all of them and see which suit you the best.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Free mobile app
jin512 said:
Hi guys, I am just wondering what is the best kernel for the Nexus 4 Mako. I am looking to improve battery life and can you flash a kernel and stay with stock 4.4.2? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can flash a custom kernel on stock rom , I suggest you to try MiRaGe kernel or Hellscore fo battery
The one that fit you.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
dppow said:
There is no best kernel, every user's preference and usage are different. The best you can do is try all of them and see which suit you the best.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
Closed
Related
I've looked it up but found nothing relevant. So...
What's the difference between the different kernels available for ace? For example, firekerneloc vs blackhawkoc or cf-root. Where can i find the info on whether they support swap partition an stuff like that?
Thnx
elmusafir said:
I've looked it up but found nothing relevant. So...
What's the difference between the different kernels available for ace? For example, firekerneloc vs blackhawkoc or cf-root. Where can i find the info on whether they support swap partition an stuff like that?
Thnx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fire kernel has support and has new sources. About the infos I think you can find it in feature list in the thread or just try it.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Latest kernels have support and upgraded sources. Cf-root is for stock roms. Firekernel is latest for cm versions
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
abhibnl said:
Latest kernels have support and upgraded sources. Cf-root is for stock roms. Firekernel is latest for cm versions
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank for the clarification, I've been looking for a kernel that gives me BLN and works with a stock rom, but I'm a bit confused some roms come with a ton of features and I dont know if they will work for a normal rom (must of th ones I've read say it works for CMX or TWX etc but none mention stock roms)!
I use battery extender as kernel for stock rom and is working great.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
So, advantages?
abhibnl said:
Latest kernels have support and upgraded sources. Cf-root is for stock roms. Firekernel is latest for cm versions
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay; so I am on Battery Extender (1.4, I believe), using S'perience ROM (based on CM7), what advantages, if any, would FirekernelOC or BlackhawkOC give me in terms of performance or battery life?
Another thing: I've seen both FirekernelOC and BlackhawkOC being used in different versions of the same ROM (take Democracy, for instance), what is the difference between the two?
thnx
elmusafir
elmusafir said:
Okay; so I am on Battery Extender (1.4, I believe), using S'perience ROM (based on CM7), what advantages, if any, would FirekernelOC or BlackhawkOC give me in terms of performance or battery life?
Another thing: I've seen both FirekernelOC and BlackhawkOC being used in different versions of the same ROM (take Democracy, for instance), what is the difference between the two?
thnx
elmusafir
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you use Battery Extender kernel on a CM7 based ROM?
Battery Extender is for Stock ROM
I've 2.3.6 Stock UBKPL ... I want to install the battery extender 1.5 ... also I want to activate the swap, but I don't know if using swap reduces performance of the battery ... ???
Enviado desde mi GT-S5830L usando Tapatalk 2
davidgmateo said:
I've 2.3.6 Stock UBKPL ... I want to install the battery extender 1.5 ... also I want to activate the swap, but I don't know if using swap reduces performance of the battery ... ???
Enviado desde mi GT-S5830L usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It reduces performance of SD Card.
KcLKcL said:
Why do you use Battery Extender kernel on a CM7 based ROM?
Battery Extender is for Stock ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly my point. Where can I get all these differences? I just read lots of opinions about these kernels but can find no precise information about them. Where can read about them? Forums are a mess and the search function becomes almost useless when you try to refine search to kernel related posts.
S Perience ROM? Its a stock based ROM!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
ROMFlasherAce said:
S Perience ROM? Its a stock based ROM!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. It isn't cm based.
Tapatalk 2 @Samsung Galaxy Ace
There are many New kernels like Diablo, Jaggy, Brood, ...
Which is the best?
I'm currently running SlimBeam With Diablos high performance 2.6 kernel
I would take a 3.x.x kernel.
Send From my iStone using xda-developers app
Lutschie said:
There are many New kernels like Diablo, Jaggy, Brood, ...
Which is the best?
I'm currently running SlimBeam With Diablos high performance 2.6 kernel
I would take a 3.x.x kernel.
Send From my iStone using xda-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try out the 3.0 kernel by Diablob555
you could choose between one of the 3 versions, i'm using ultrahigh performance one and its very smooth or you could use batterysaving one if you want max battery life
hope i helped
I'll try it thanks a lot
Send From my iStone using xda-developers app
Kernel
markey97 said:
try out the 3.0 kernel by Diablob555
you could choose between one of the 3 versions, i'm using ultrahigh performance one and its very smooth or you could use batterysaving one if you want max battery life
hope i helped
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where can I find the diablo's kernels. Coz the thread of Diablo is closed.
AW: [Q] best kernel for JB on i9001
Nowhere try one the new ones like Phantom or nexus kernel. They're are equals or even better than diablos'
Send From my iStone using xda-developers app
hey i am curently using nexus kernel v9 at my galaxy S plus...with CM10 beta 2 rom and the battery life performance seems great...the only thing i want to ask is has anyone stayed with CM10 beta 2 kernel ? is it better that nexus kernel ?
Which is better? Which gives better battery life? Can any explain the difference? Thanks in advance.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
b2dj said:
Which is better? Which gives better battery life? Can any explain the difference? Thanks in advance.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what have you researched so far?
remember everyone has their own opinion
how, this is a dev forum so we try to encourage members to do some research and try a few things before spoon feeding them all the information
Well you can give it a try to enox rom, dmod or benz, and the cyanogen custom rom too, all of them take care of your battery life since there isn't so much stock apps (specially cyanogen) all of them are better than stock for battery life! you never know if you never try one of them
CM have about 25 million users worldwide, and now Cm11 is taking a huge step forward by using this new easy way to upgrade the smartphone system. Omni Rom 4.4 is a new project, with great and promising fectures and developers. What is the best way to go? They will be nearly the same?
For me there is only CM I`m a big fan since CM 9 ...but i think you should test both and make your own decision what works better for you ...
sorry for this ,but in the end it is subjective where your own preferences are ...
Oliv3go said:
CM have about 25 million users worldwide, and now Cm11 is taking a huge step forward by using this new easy way to upgrade the smartphone system. Omni Rom 4.4 is a new project, with great and promising fectures and developers. What is the best way to go? They will be nearly the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This boils down to personal preference. They won't be the same - CM will have features that Omni doesn't, and vice versa.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
Thanks for your reply. Maybe is time to try the dual boot mod for i9000.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
To test both ? :good:
Oliv3go said:
Thanks for your reply. Maybe is time to try the dual boot mod for i9000.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mackay ROM !!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Well, I'd try cm11, it works really smooth and the new cminstaler makes life easier to newbies
Enviado desde mi GT-I9000 mediante Tapatalk
Oh you tested the new installer??? I thought that pawitp don`t support our device with this ...
jorgecft said:
Well, I'd try cm11, it works really smooth and the new cminstaler makes life easier to newbies
Enviado desde mi GT-I9000 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
both are good
i think CM11 is a very good rom. i have Mackay KK 4.1.1 on my Galaxy i9000 and it is very very smooth and stable. I also test Mackay Omni rom alpha and i think it is also an interesting Rom.
freakymod2120 said:
Oh you tested the new installer??? I thought that pawitp don`t support our device with this ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use cm11 4.4.1 ..it's very nice the new system update. Works fine in every aspect
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Sorry i was wrong...you mean the cm updater in CM itself and not the cminstaller for bringing CM to your device with rooting first time and so on ....now it is clear...
Oliv3go said:
I use cm11 4.4.1 ..it's very nice the new system update. Works fine in every aspect
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Omnirom will be great, they're focusing their attention on under-the-hood features of great interest:
Multiwindows,
Delta update,
Reworked DSP
OmniFile
and their development plan will make Omnirom an really appreciated rom
M0Rf30 said:
I think Omnirom will be great, they're focusing their attention on under-the-hood features of great interest:
Multiwindows,
Delta update,
Reworked DSP
OmniFile
and their development plan will make Omnirom an really appreciated rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Multi Windows!!!!? if that 's right then this will be the best ROM for i9000.
But omnirom is still in alpha mode with many issues pending to be solved.
CM nightly have very little minor bugs which can be ignored. I love it. I am using cyanAOSP 1.4.0 KitKat ROM based on CM11 and it is awesome.
this is my 100th post, and finally a senior member on XDA. yippie!!!!
I'm not sure that multi windows is going to be much use to us on a 4" screen..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
I think that we will never see multi windows on i9000 anyway...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Good. It's a stupid idea IMO lol
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
my personal opinion (and wish) for every ROM/kernel developer would be to focus on power consumption. I have tried many ROM and read too many threads...Not a single ROM/kernel can reach stock ROM's deep sleep figures
aris_p said:
my personal opinion (and wish) for every ROM/kernel developer would be to focus on power consumption. I have tried many ROM and read too many threads...Not a single ROM/kernel can reach stock ROM's deep sleep figures
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is only so much you can do, especially since you're running firmware intended for stronger devices, with dual and quad cores being the norm for ICS/JB nowadays
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
I have tried many custom roms but not satisfied and since long time using stock rom...
Can you guys suggest how to get best performance and battery life out of stock rom 5.0.2?
Sent from my XT1068 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
amritmalviya said:
I have tried many custom roms but not satisfied and since long time using stock rom...
Can you guys suggest how to get best performance and battery life out of stock rom 5.0.2?
Sent from my XT1068 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was using stock for a while after i got invited for soak test. Recently after exams, i flashed minimal os with decipher personal kernel and im happy with the battery and performance and stability of the rom. If u intend on using stock rom, flash stellar kernel. That's the way to go.
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using Tapatalk
Ayush Jain said:
I was using stock for a while after i got invited for soak test. Recently after exams, i flashed minimal os with decipher personal kernel and im happy with the battery and performance and stability of the rom. If u intend on using stock rom, flash stellar kernel. That's the way to go.
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used stellar kernel quite a long time but it got slow down after a few days so i revert back to stock kernel....
Sent from my XT1068 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
amritmalviya said:
I have used stellar kernel quite a long time but it got slow down after a few days so i revert back to stock kernel....
Sent from my XT1068 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you try minimal os? It's rockstable and has a good battery life.
Sent with somewhat