Related
i hope all the bugs are fix the develop. i know its to hard to develop..
thnx to many developer...hooray.
Just flash the latest aokp rom its genius and i dont have any issues with it, its working even faster than the stock rom on my double speeded gt-p6200... have fun. By the way, there will never be a final ics on custom roms, there is always an idea to make it better ;-)
Sent from my GT-P6200 using XDA
marvz098 said:
i hope all the bugs are fix the develop. i know its to hard to develop..
thnx to many developer...hooray.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no such thing as 'bug free' buld that is why we always have new versions(builds) untill the dev team decides to move on to something new. Therefore I would imagine there won't be 'Final' ICS untill Android 5 (Jellybean) available and the dev team decides to move on to Jellybean (assuming many of us still sticking to our G-tab 7 and plenty developers still willing to crack one for us.)
However the latest builds of ICS are very stable and suitable for daily use.
yappoe said:
There is no such thing as 'bug free' buld that is why we always have new versions(builds) untill the dev team decides to move on to something new. Therefore I would imagine there won't be 'Final' ICS untill Android 5 (Jellybean) available and the dev team decides to move on to Jellybean (assuming many of us still sticking to our G-tab 7 and plenty developers still willing to crack one for us.)
However the latest builds of ICS are very stable and suitable for daily use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You right, i'm using AOKP for my daily use. 3G,wifi, active sync exchange, dropbox all of them working smoothly only usb tethering not working in milestone #5 but overall great rom...
Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk 2
Hello guys...
Which brings me here is that I want your opinion ...
I'm planning to work in ICS 4.0.4 rom, do a normal costum rom, tweaks, add theming, features, etc.
Rom will be based on the FOP, I will not fix bugs, of course if I know the solution to resolve, I resolve: P
i will be updating the rom as new nightlys come out from FOP team.
What i wanna ask you is if you want the rom now or when it cames out the rom ICS stable.
If i launch the rom now, i will be updating the rom as new nightlys come out from FOP team.
Stable.
Now
Skickat från min LG-P970 via Tapatalk 2
only stable , or some long ago to work on graphic design, mainly ICS
ofcourse stable :fingers-crossed:
If i launch the rom now, i will be updating the rom as new nightlys come out from FOP team.
koila33 said:
If i launch the rom now, i will be updating the rom as new nightlys come out from FOP team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe in the process you can fix some bugs and help FOP team.
the best way in my opinion, is that you start working on it now in order to minimalise a late for the future. after that, publishing or not will be as your wants, following stability of the rom
koila33 said:
Hello guys...
Which brings me here is that I want your opinion ...
I'm planning to work in ICS 4.0.4 rom, do a normal costum rom, tweaks, add theming, features, etc.
Rom will be based on the FOP, I will not fix bugs, of course if I know the solution to resolve, I resolve: P
i will be updating the rom as new nightlys come out from FOP team.
What i wanna ask you is if you want the rom now or when it cames out the rom ICS stable.
If i launch the rom now, i will be updating the rom as new nightlys come out from FOP team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is FOP?
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2
An abbreviation for free Optimus project
Envoyé depuis mon P970
Would be awesome if someone could get the camera to work and make a stable version of CM9, that's all I want. perhaps some overclocking features would be great too...
What about helping FOP instead starting from nothing.
rimatox said:
Would be awesome if someone could get the camera to work and make a stable version of CM9, that's all I want. perhaps some overclocking features would be great too...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you want OC on our cm9?It's fast....
why would we consern us about speed before it's stable?
Imo it would be better to tune/super tune the roms that we ald have rather than have too many. ... just saying.. .
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium
dcop7 said:
Maybe in the process you can fix some bugs and help FOP team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I want to say.:good:
i want official MIUI
Working camera in Pandroid ROM,or in CM9... and that is all!
That 2 ROM is better than anyone...
Good rom!! All developers should work on the develop of ICS!
GB is the past, JB the future, ICS is the present!!!
GB is the past, JB the future, ICS is the present!!!::laugh: very good
Port this! http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19701921 for both ics and gb
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
vizzy said:
It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm torn between the two! On the one hand, I want a stable ROM which would be CM9, but I also love that JellyBean goodness. I've also seen some people here that simply want a stable CM9 that's up to date, and other's that want the latest CM10 despite bugs. That's the point of this thread
I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?
My vote goes towards CM9! been using codename for the past couple months and although i'm enjoying all the new features, i still find myself yearning for a rock solid & stable ASOP based build.
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
linezero said:
I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could give it a try, but if nik and others couldn't get a 3.0 kernel up and running for AOSP, then I'll have a damn hard time. I'd prefer to have someone else make the new kernel, I don't know much about compiling them. Till then, I would just use X-ICS4.0 for the kernel.
Make a CM9, CM10 would have in the end too much bugs and they would just chance again. I'm waiting for a stable cm9 anyway
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Kernel 3, Cm10 got my vote
sent from my jellybean device
ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!
Yeah. CM9 would be OK for me too. I can help with testing if needed.
But what would be those great JB features we would be missing out? Sry I haven't been following the differences between 4.0 and 4.1.
IncS community is desperate for at least one fully functional, bugless AOSP ROM, so my vote goes for CM9
CM9 bro..wishing for bugless one.. gud luck..
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
My 2 cents.
CM9. Kernel sources for ICS has been release by HTC and ANY AOSP rom that is stable would be very welcome in our community.
(I know there is gingerbread roms.. But.. Its ginger bread..)
Jelly Bean is nice and all,
But the odds of getting a stable AOSP rom are much higher with cm9.
CM9 I would say. I hope you can fix data problems for Vodafone NL users. We always have problems with data connection on AOSP ROMs.
CM9 would be great....!!
Its great to see devs are enthusiasticaly working on Roms..!!
You are the one dude...
Jst for info u might already aware of
This thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1914015
CM10 test build
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
my vote a CM9 ASOP rom and bugless
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
naathaanb96 said:
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree. I don't like much sense ROMs, CM9 with working camera and camcorder would be perfect!
Thanks ZaySk
CM9!!!!
ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My request would be neither CM9 nor CM 10.... it will be great if you can work on Kernel Version 3.... Becz that is the only roadblock for us for Jelly Bean and would open doors for may developers to come up with fresh and exciting jelly bean ROMs.....Why stay behind the world guys... lets target Jelly bean step by step.....who knows if you start working on kernel it may really turn out to be good.....Try for kernel bro......all the best.. try to compile it from source....
A rock solid cm9 would be great!
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Hi Friends ,
I have galaxy s advanced from last six months and during that time i have installed different custom roms on my mobile , Many roms are ported and originally not made for S-Advanced and causes lots of problem. I tried nearly every available custom rom and finally i settled on one rom but i will not mention name of that rom now. I just want to know your experience about this roms and please suggest best rom for our most loved Galaxy S -advance. Please don't give your suggestion by just reading others post, give your suggestion only if you have tried it.
This Are links for different ROMS for our S-Advance
1. Unofficial CyanogenMod 10.1 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2108362
2. Unofficial CyanogenMod 10 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2248822
3. Unofficial AOKP 4.2.2 | Sources Built : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2369931
4. Paranoid Android 3.60 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2246822
5. PAC 23.0.X | ParanoidAndroid + AOKP + CM10.1 | Source built : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2324100
6. HarshJelly ROM v2.0 - A pure touchwiz experience : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2342314
7. UNOFFICIAL CARBON ROM based on PAC 23.0 [BETA v2] | Ported : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2348906
8. MIUI v4 [BETA 5/5B - 19.08.2013] : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2197333
9. Pure Vanilla ★ Smoothness Refined ★ Solid Stable (25/6/13) : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2182697
10. AOKP 4.1.2 [Build 1] : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2363061
11. LightJB v1.2 - with a touch of S4 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2244441
12. [ROM] [GALAXPERIA]_v2.0 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2206406
13. Optimus Droid : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2201240
14. Windows Phone Project : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2210864
15. [CM10] SamNex : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2362273
This is not a constructive post. Comparing ROM's and the dev's is not a good thing.
Not only is it not a good thing but it is prohibited here in XDA to compare roms. The mods will definitely close this thread soon.
To the OP, you should read the thread of the rom and search in general section there are already lots of threads like this. And all was shut down by forum mods but you can still read the reviews/comments.
My advice: Read, read and read. Even if you think you have read enough, just keep reading.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
I think this thread can help s advance users in a way..
Everybody has there views. People use what works best, if this thread gives a little knowledge in that means. Then that's good.
Comparing ROMS n DEV's is totally diff thing. Few devs of not so popular ROM n modify to request immediately, n devs of best ROM r hidden God. So I feel it's not the point here. It can b a little helpful thread n that's what this forum is bout, increasing knowledge, atleast I feel so.
Rest moderators knows the best..
:thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9070 using Tapatalk 2
You can start giving your review first then. Share to us what you find out after trying them all out.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Sorry if anybody hurt,
Sorry if anybody hurt because of this post. I have tested all this 15 roms. I am not hardcore android develper, i am basically wed deveopler but i wanted to try every available rom for my device and wanted to stay in touch with this new development. I am tracking nearly all in I9070 section for long time and keep testing everything. I bricked my phone more than 10 times but i learned a lot. But i know many testers visit this site , try 1 or 2 popular roms and when this roms not works upto there expectation or keep crashing they stop testing and return to stock . I just wanted to give those many persons like me this available options and want there reviews on this different roms. I have given links to all roms so they can download them. Many ROMs are very good but not popular or neglected. So please post your reviews only after testing them.
There is no point of comparing devs or ROMs. People use what is best. Xperia z ultra is far superior dan GS4. But that doesn't mean that GS4 is bad. This is just a kind of review. I am very satisfied with Light JB 1.2 except few minor bugs.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Please REMOVE my poll from this post.
I request administrator to remove poll from this post. I put it in the post but as per XDA rule i cant remove it so please remove the poll from this post . Thank you.
androiddoctor said:
I request administrator to remove poll from this post. I put it in the post but as per XDA rule i cant remove it so please remove the poll from this post . Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to know that mods do not like comparing threads. Do not think so that those users that commended here atacking you. Look all over xda, those kind of threads are being locked.
It would be World war 3 if someone posted Android vs iOS.
P.S. To argument my words: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1965037
Послато са GT-I9070 користећи Тапаталк 4
shut_down said:
Just to know that mods do not like comparing threads. Do not think so that those users that commended here atacking you. Look all over xda, those kind of threads are being locked.
It would be World war 3 if someone posted Android vs iOS.
P.S. To argument my words: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1965037
Послато са GT-I9070 користећи Тапаталк 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dear Sir,
I never wanted to criticize any rom , i just wanted to help other visitors and testers to find available roms and i want them to test this roms . All roms listed above are very nice but some of them are vastly neglected , i thought this post might help those roms to become popular and which might lead us to perfect rom for our beloved galaxy S-advanced. Many developers stopped there development and or concentrating other project just because there rom is not popular. I never thought this will hurt others . Putting that poll along with this post is my biggest mistake
androiddoctor said:
Dear Sir,
I never wanted to criticize any rom , i just wanted to help other visitors and testers to find available roms and i want them to test this roms . All roms listed above are very nice but some of them are vastly neglected , i thought this post might help those roms to become popular and which might lead us to perfect rom for our beloved galaxy S-advanced. Many developers stopped there development and or concentrating other project just because there rom is not popular. I never thought this will hurt others . Putting that poll along with this post is my biggest mistake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Calm down. I just told you what mods are up to. :angel:
Hey...is the stable build of the cyanogenmod available yet? Cant wait to flash it.iv used jellymod before and it was nice except the performance was a little less compared to stock.can anyone tell when the cyanogenmod will be done?
Sent from my GT-I9070 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
bloodalvin784 said:
Hey...is the stable build of the cyanogenmod available yet? Cant wait to flash it.iv used jellymod before and it was nice except the performance was a little less compared to stock.can anyone tell when the cyanogenmod will be done?
Sent from my GT-I9070 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM rule: No ETA's. With that being said, current nightly of cm10.1 is good and can be used as daily driver if you don't mind:
1. Wifi tether and wifi direct not working.
2. Blurry image and video hangs on latest youtube (the app fault not the rom, you have to use older version of youtube and it works fine).
3. Camera bug in instagram (but just take the pic first and later edit in instagram and post. I always do that anyway so it doesn't matter at all).
4. Battery issue (can't charge offline).
5. GPS (you hve to calibrate it first then it works just fine).
Choice is yours. :good:
I tried it once...was too laggy and the antutu score came down to 4500 from 7000.I'm now using stock with cocore 7.6 antutu score has gone upto 9200.which one do u suggest? Custom rom or keep using stock?
Sent from my GT-I9070 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Hey Friend If You Are Looking For Stable ROM you should Stick To Custom ROM,
For Our Galaxy S Advanced There Is No Official Custom ROM, All ROMS come with Some Bugs.
If You Want New Feature In Your Device You Have To Compromise With Stability.
Some Stock Firmware Based ROM are More Stable Like Galexperia But Don't Come With Much Extra Feature.
CM10.0 Is Now Very Much Developed and stable.
Diegio working hard on CM10.1 and I M Sure He Will Release Final Version Very Soon. Untill now 21/06 is more stable than others according to me.
Thanks bro
Sent from my GT-I9070 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
androiddoctor said:
....He Will Release Final Version Very Soon. ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you wanna say STABLE not FINAL.
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
I think you wanna say STABLE not FINAL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right.
androiddoctor said:
Hey Friend If You Are Looking For Stable ROM you should Stick To Custom ROM,
For Our Galaxy S Advanced There Is No Official Custom ROM, All ROMS come with Some Bugs.
If You Want New Feature In Your Device You Have To Compromise With Stability.
Some Stock Firmware Based ROM are More Stable Like Galexperia But Don't Come With Much Extra Feature.
CM10.0 Is Now Very Much Developed and stable.
Diegio working hard on CM10.1 and I M Sure He Will Release Final Version Very Soon. Untill now 21/06 is more stable than others according to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried 27/08 build onwards? So much better than 21/06.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
My personal opinion is harsh jelly v2.1
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
So I want to slide to AOSP ROM already.. but the list is too long and my time is too short..
Could any one please report and share some of your experience with the AOSP ROMs?
Which is the most stable? and is it ready for daily use?
Compare it to the stock..
I don't care about features / android version or anything else.. just AOSP and most stable..
Your help would be extra appreciated.
Jordan.
Pabx is the only aosp. The others are based on Cm.
It's also incredibly stable & definitely recommended
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4
fards said:
Pabx is the only aosp. The others are based on Cm.
It's also incredibly stable & definitely recommended
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for that recommending!
Apologies for confusing I guess I can't tell the difference between AOSP and CM (and others if there are more..)
I meant a clean version of the Android with nothing related to Sony.. no UI, no touchwiz and no sense..
Clean like the nexus..
With the quick settings on the notification bar..
Any kinds of those..
Hope thats more clear..
fards said:
Pabx is the only aosp. The others are based on Cm.
It's also incredibly stable & definitely recommended
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
would you say CM and Pabx AOSP are around the same smoothness?
Personally I prefer the work that pabx has done on his aosp kernel, than what free xperia have done with CM one.
CM is nice for all the extra bits, but aosp is stripped back and basic and a chunk more responsive. I put a lightly modified version of his kernel in his thread that allows undervolting, so it's also fairly decent battery wise.
Best to try all the major ones out and see which you prefer.
FWIW sonys stock roms (Once you take out the usual extra bloat apps) are pretty close to aosp roms, they don't tend to change massive amounts from the qualcomm code.
Out of the major oems I'd say they run closest to the true android experience.
Like fards I'd recommend Pabx 4.3 ROM though it is quite bone stock AOSP. A stable CM ROM that is still quite light would be CyanX 7.0. I use it personally as my daily driver. Pretty stable and fast with good battery.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4
Member since 2011 and you still don't understand "No questions in General section"???
Thank you all for recommending..
And Rashkae, sorry if it ain't in the right place, I found it more suitable to General as a discussion and not as "How do I..." question..
The forum didn't have any discuss for ROMs and opinions of each so I thought why not raise it up myself..
mcjordan92 said:
So I want to slide to AOSP ROM already.. but the list is too long and my time is too short..
Could any one please report and share some of your experience with the AOSP ROMs?
Which is the most stable? and is it ready for daily use?
Compare it to the stock..
I don't care about features / android version or anything else.. just AOSP and most stable..
Your help would be extra appreciated.
Jordan.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love AOSP and paired with Gravity Box(xposed) it gets all the extra bits of CM.
But i still give CM based ROMs an upper hand due to features like per app dpi, PA pie, general all in one packaging and still maintaining performance.
Here are a few ROMs I like
Carbon - Loads of features, extremely fast and battery friendly(except for the latest version)
Mokee - Smooth, all usefull features.
CyanX - Stable and basic CM features and a custom kernel.
PAC - Has all the features u could think of, though a bit buggy.
Jelly bam- True all in one ROM just like PAC
Commotio/Vanir - The best ROM i've tried till now, Sooo fast, stable and great devs
A few more that I've tried : Asylum , CM 10.2 , AOKP, etc ( select yuga in device)
YouTube these ROM (check Nexus 4 videos) before you try them it has the same features irrespective of the device.
Wow thats like a database for XZ
That's extremely helpful! Thank you so much
Sent from my Xperia Z.