Related
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
vizzy said:
It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm torn between the two! On the one hand, I want a stable ROM which would be CM9, but I also love that JellyBean goodness. I've also seen some people here that simply want a stable CM9 that's up to date, and other's that want the latest CM10 despite bugs. That's the point of this thread
I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?
My vote goes towards CM9! been using codename for the past couple months and although i'm enjoying all the new features, i still find myself yearning for a rock solid & stable ASOP based build.
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
linezero said:
I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could give it a try, but if nik and others couldn't get a 3.0 kernel up and running for AOSP, then I'll have a damn hard time. I'd prefer to have someone else make the new kernel, I don't know much about compiling them. Till then, I would just use X-ICS4.0 for the kernel.
Make a CM9, CM10 would have in the end too much bugs and they would just chance again. I'm waiting for a stable cm9 anyway
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Kernel 3, Cm10 got my vote
sent from my jellybean device
ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!
Yeah. CM9 would be OK for me too. I can help with testing if needed.
But what would be those great JB features we would be missing out? Sry I haven't been following the differences between 4.0 and 4.1.
IncS community is desperate for at least one fully functional, bugless AOSP ROM, so my vote goes for CM9
CM9 bro..wishing for bugless one.. gud luck..
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
My 2 cents.
CM9. Kernel sources for ICS has been release by HTC and ANY AOSP rom that is stable would be very welcome in our community.
(I know there is gingerbread roms.. But.. Its ginger bread..)
Jelly Bean is nice and all,
But the odds of getting a stable AOSP rom are much higher with cm9.
CM9 I would say. I hope you can fix data problems for Vodafone NL users. We always have problems with data connection on AOSP ROMs.
CM9 would be great....!!
Its great to see devs are enthusiasticaly working on Roms..!!
You are the one dude...
Jst for info u might already aware of
This thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1914015
CM10 test build
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
my vote a CM9 ASOP rom and bugless
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
naathaanb96 said:
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree. I don't like much sense ROMs, CM9 with working camera and camcorder would be perfect!
Thanks ZaySk
CM9!!!!
ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My request would be neither CM9 nor CM 10.... it will be great if you can work on Kernel Version 3.... Becz that is the only roadblock for us for Jelly Bean and would open doors for may developers to come up with fresh and exciting jelly bean ROMs.....Why stay behind the world guys... lets target Jelly bean step by step.....who knows if you start working on kernel it may really turn out to be good.....Try for kernel bro......all the best.. try to compile it from source....
A rock solid cm9 would be great!
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Hello everyone!
You might have read about OmniROM in XDA news. More info about the project: http://omnirom.org/ and http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2601.
I have compiled the first ever unofficial build of the rom from unpublished Gerrit sources and guess what, for the p880.
Screenshots: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2481797. This thread will be the discussion and Q&A thread for OmniROM. It will be officially supported and maintained by me.
Your a legend Adam, im very optimistic about this project and we must one of the first to get it! hows it run so far?
All standard features that I use works, except BT which is not that hard to fix. Some patches are needed and it'll work. Performance is crappy, because there is a bug in the kernel that makes only one core to be enabled. Will be pushing fixes and improvements here and there as it gets running. I'm really excited to work on this, this is sth I've been waiting for a long time.
Adam77Root said:
Hello everyone!
You might have read about OmniROM in XDA news. More info about the project: http://omnirom.org/ and http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2601.
I have compiled the first ever unofficial build of the rom from unpublished Gerrit sources and guess what, for the p880.
Screenshots: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2481797. This thread will be the discussion and Q&A thread for OmniROM. It will be officially supported and maintained by me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cant wait to see how it goes. good luck!
Its going to be exciting
Adam77Root said:
Hello everyone!
You might have read about OmniROM in XDA news. More info about the project: http://omnirom.org/ and http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2601.
I have compiled the first ever unofficial build of the rom from unpublished Gerrit sources and guess what, for the p880.
Screenshots: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2481797. This thread will be the discussion and Q&A thread for OmniROM. It will be officially supported and maintained by me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really appreciate your work and effort keep up the good work. Its great to have you among us for development of our device.
Sent from my LG-P880 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Adam77Root said:
I found the needed patch for BT today, will be there in the next version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do not have to hurry. I'll be waiting. This is not a problem. Make your work and live your private life. Thank you. Hálás köszönet.
Best regards
hello Adam,
this rom indeed shows promise.
i would like to compile this from source, can you upload your sources?
thanks.
I don't know what's going on, how can this already be smoother then the latest cm10.2 nightlies? I'm very impressed so far. I was just flashing to test but I think she's a keeper.
Only thing I've found is a little bit of lag on the default launcher.
gandhar said:
hello Adam,
this rom indeed shows promise.
i would like to compile this from source, can you upload your sources?
thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will be available later at OmniROM official GitHub page.
JoinTheRealms said:
I don't know what's going on, how can this already be smoother then the latest cm10.2 nightlies? I'm very impressed so far. I was just flashing to test but I think she's a keeper.
Only thing I've found is a little bit of lag on the default launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you flash iodak v08 (or probably any other custom kernel), the lag is gone.
Tbks ROM is oficial for the p880? Or is unofficial
And is multilanguaje?
tiflao said:
Tbks ROM is oficial for the p880? Or is unofficial
And is multilanguaje?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's semi-official. Built from unpublished code.
Multilanguage, translations will be improved with time.
Sent from my OmniROM-powered LG Optimus 4X HD
No supersu in this ROM ?
I had to install this
Sent from my Optimus 4X HD using xda app-developers app
@adam77 when the Rom will official release for our phone can you please then delete useless part like:
On Pac Man Rom we have Paranoid,Aokp and CyanogenMod in one Rom and in Aokp Settings under LED the Led Test don't work because these features is for phones with colorable led.
And so features are unless when Omni Rom will maybe have some of this useless features can you please remove?
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
musklor said:
No supersu in this ROM ?
I had to install this
Sent from my Optimus 4X HD using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. It will be included later.
Nemeziz 56th said:
@adam77 when the Rom will official release for our phone can you please then delete useless part like:
On Pac Man Rom we have Paranoid,Aokp and CyanogenMod in one Rom and in Aokp Settings under LED the Led Test don't work because these features is for phones with colorable led.
And so features are unless when Omni Rom will maybe have some of this useless features can you please remove?
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I won't have to delete them, they will be hidden by default on devices which don't support those features. This is a very early build, the code wasn't even published yet when I compiled it.
BTW new build coming tomorrow. Fixed BT, BT tethering and Torch. Also, the device tree is now ready to be forked into official repos. Will update my GitHub tomorrow.
Very good job!
Thank you.
Sent from my Optimus 4X HD using xda app-developers app
@Adam77Root how is camera in this rom? Other roms based in CM the camera is not so perfect when compared with stock.
What about this?
Thanks
gengi said:
@Adam77Root how is camera in this rom? Other roms based in CM the camera is not so perfect when compared with stock.
What about this?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its the same as cyanogenmod
TWRP support?
can i flash with TWRP?
gandhar said:
can i flash with TWRP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes.
This is question for developers and porters.Why no one is porting new builds of liquidsmooth rom since it is for me best rom for our phone.I am still flashing old demetris build...
dimi89 said:
This is question for developers and porters.Why no one is porting new builds of liquidsmooth rom since it is for me best rom for our phone.I am still flashing old demetris build...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to ask for this, I know I should install and test for myself the rom,
But I just would like to know how is the battery life on this rom?
What about the power button? Does it work properly? Because I had this issue on android 4.3 based rom's.
And the camera? Clear images and sharper?
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards from Brazil
By the way, in my opinion android 4.2.2 is the most stable atm
Rafael Cardoso said:
Sorry to ask for this, I know I should install and test for myself the rom,
But I just would like to know how is the battery life on this rom?
What about the power button? Does it work properly? Because I had this issue on android 4.3 based rom's.
And the camera? Clear images and sharper?
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards from Brazil
By the way, in my opinion android 4.2.2 is the most stable atm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Build that we currently have ported by Demetris is 4.2.2 and for me it is the best custom rom out there.Camera and battery are great even with stock app and stock kernel.Alwayse switching between MIUI and LiquidSmooth.Flash it and test is for couple of days yourself and see if you are satisfied.
Greetings from Serbia
what bugs does it have?
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Ben36 said:
what bugs does it have?
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Test it or read the last few posts of the rom thread.
Not that hard, is it?
Sent from my 4X HD via XDA Premium
it's also not hard for the devs to just put them in the OP but they all seem scared to admit there are bugs on this forum
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
dimi89 said:
Build that we currently have ported by Demetris is 4.2.2 and for me it is the best custom rom out there.Camera and battery are great even with stock app and stock kernel.Alwayse switching between MIUI and LiquidSmooth.Flash it and test is for couple of days yourself and see if you are satisfied.
Greetings from Serbia
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@dimi89 Dimi! Thank you again! You have already answered me on another post, and again here, with the same education and niceness
Thanks, I flashed LiquidSmooth rom and until this moment, no problems at all.. everything ok with iodak kernel v8 10.1..
Greetings from Brazil
Ben36 said:
it's also not hard for the devs to just put them in the OP but they all seem scared to admit there are bugs on this forum
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's even easier for YOU to test it yourself. Backup your current setup and flash it. Most of the mentioned bugs aren't even for everybody and it is actually quite hard for the devs to make a full list of bugs which occur for every single user.
If you don't agree with that it's your fault. The devs are doing an awesome job here and they do it because they want to.
Sent from my 4X HD via XDA Premium
In my honest opinion, bugs should be on the OP if they are known bugs. It's a matter of structure and information. But that's just me
From what I understood, carbon is a "fork" from Liquid and I think it's a compilation from source and not a port, right? If so, is it possible to compile Liquid from source as well ?
This question is for someone who knows or a developer
MidnightDevil said:
In my honest opinion, bugs should be on the OP if they are known bugs. It's a matter of structure and information. But that's just me
From what I understood, carbon is a "fork" from Liquid and I think it's a compilation from source and not a port, right? If so, is it possible to compile Liquid from source as well ?
This question is for someone who knows or a developer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They stated that Carbon rom doesnt have anything to do with liquid team.Also if you look at title on older liquid builds by demetris you will see it says "Official" so i think it is possible to compile from source.Asked demetris long time ago about liquid future for our phone but still no answer.
dimi89 said:
They stated that Carbon rom doesnt have anything to do with liquid team.Also if you look at title on older liquid builds by demetris you will see it says "Official" so i think it is possible to compile from source.Asked demetris long time ago about liquid future for our phone but still no answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, they stated the following:
CarbonRom is an aftermarket firmware based on the Android Open Source Project. The team is composed of former members of Team Liquid who have forked the code in an attempt to bring greater speed, better coding, and full authorship to code. We are in no way affiliated with Liquid0624. The rom was forked at Liquid beta 3.2.1 and has since undergone major code changes and modifications.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They "forked" the code, although it was changed a LOT, a fork is a fork
Anyway, I'm gonna have a look later on see if Liquid can be compiled for our p880.
Thanks dimi :good:
MidnightDevil said:
No, they stated the following:
They "forked" the code, although it was changed a LOT, a fork is a fork
Anyway, I'm gonna have a look later on see if Liquid can be compiled for our p880.
Thanks dimi :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No,THANK you man Someone sayed that all 4.2 builds are much better then 4.3 roms builds and i agree on that.
Far as I understood the source is published.
Will see what I can do during the weekend
https://github.com/LiquidSmooth/android
And yeah, I agree, I'm pretty happy with CM10. 1.3. Although I do miss the privacy features from 4.3.
Mods can lock and delete this since demerits answered our prayers and ported new version.
Sent from my microwave.
Hello , i'm trying at the moment to build Aokp Kitkat from source for our device according to this tutorial But i can't find the device source/repo , can someone help me please?
Thanks
Edit : Found it , starting the sync
I hope its pure aokp . The only pure ROM on here I have seen is CyanogenMod. All the other have had mods cherry picked from other ROMs
Sent from my GT-I9305 using XDA Free mobile app
It's really a pure AOKP , as a beginner , i dont know how to pick features from other roms x) , maybe if it works well i will inform myself and try an ParanoidAndroid :good:
Oh good. You could also try pure aosp. Its a little bit more work to try get it working but I'm sure you could do it.. I got high hopes for you. Hope it turns out well
Sent from my GT-I9305 using XDA Free mobile app
@aaz03 hows the compiling coming along????
For Development Related Requests :
#1. Please begin your post with "Request:". You don't have to mention me. It's very important to have "Request:" (formatting doesn't matter) at the beginning of your post as I don't check the posts manually — I use the TapaTalk API to filter them.
#2. Describe your request in details. Make sure to include any additional info or screenshots you may think helpful.
Please DO NOT ASK QUESTIONS ON THIS THREAD.....This Is A Pure Android One Device Development Request Thread!
Reserved
Request
Make Paranoid Android 4.45 if are willing to build a ROM for Android One...
4.45 is the latest stable version out there, 4.5 is in alpha but it's good though with L styled recent apps switching
I'd say, go for PA as we already have CM11 and OMNI ROM in progress. Rest is your choice :good:
paranoid android
Dear Dev,
Please make a rom woith fully stable version....omni rom is nice but it has some few bugs...please correct it...
and also make paranoid android rom for android one devices...
and also please post link of original stock roms of android one devices and full procedure first.....
thanks
mahesh.g
psychopac said:
Make Paranoid Android 4.45 if are willing to build a ROM for Android One...
4.45 is the latest stable version out there, 4.5 is in alpha but it's good though with L styled recent apps switching
I'd say, go for PA as we already have CM11 and OMNI ROM in progress. Rest is your choice :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As Quoted [email protected]##W4TCH0UT## on Facebook looks like he is building AOSPA...should ask him! ?
Kunal.Kene.1797 said:
As Quoted [email protected]##W4TCH0UT## on Facebook looks like he is building AOSPA...should ask him! ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He released paranoid android .. Hope Sim issue's sort out as quickly as possible..
deccen90 said:
He released paranoid android .. Hope Sim issue's sort out as quickly as possible..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its Source Is Damaged...No Customization Options Available except (Theme Engine) hope He Fixes It Soon:highfive:
Kunal.Kene.1797 said:
Its Source Is Damaged...No Customization Options Available except (Theme Engine) hope He Fixes It Soon:highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now I get it. PA hasn't actually updated their customization options source since jellybean. They're trying hard to bring it back, but no luck. Paranoid Android 4.4.4 has NO CUSTOMIZATION options.
##W4TCH0UT## said:
Now I get it. PA hasn't actually updated their customization options source since jellybean. They're trying hard to bring it back, but no luck. Paranoid Android 4.4.4 has NO CUSTOMIZATION options.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That made me cry...i loved PA a lot [emoji22]...well then what will you be working on next [emoji4] ?
Posted Using Android One SmartPhone Using Tapatalk.
Kunal.Kene.1797 said:
That made me cry...i loved PA a lot [emoji22]...well then what will you be working on next [emoji4] ?
Posted Using Android One SmartPhone Using Tapatalk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a secret
##W4TCH0UT## said:
It's a secret
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I and WE Love Them [emoji6]
Posted Using Android One SmartPhone Using Tapatalk.
##W4TCH0UT## said:
It's a secret
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Port miui ROM lots of people losing great android one mobiles with kernel sources for that ROM..[emoji6]
Miui sucks
deccen90 said:
Port miui ROM lots of people losing great android one mobiles with kernel sources for that ROM..[emoji6]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uses A Lot Of RAM ANd Slows DOwn The Performance! Even Visually not of my liking!
Please develop kernels with "double tap to wake up device" feature
Kernel for overlcocking
REQUEST
A kernel with options available for overclocking. There is the Thunderzap kernel...but it doesn't allow overclocking..
Pleaser work on it! Please!
Thanks in advance :victory: :laugh: :laugh: :good:
I'm on stock rooted ROM with custom kernel and recovery with some bloat removed even planning to flash custom roms .... how to make my mobile ready for android lollipop update give multiple options ??
pls port siyah kernel or any other dual boot kernel
hey devs...pls port siyah or any other dual boot kernel....i want one permanent rom which will be stable and one rom with which i can play with..........and more there will be no issue of restoring stock rom again nd again.....thnqqq devs....rock on.....jai mata di
kapish said:
hey devs...pls port siyah or any other dual boot kernel....i want one permanent rom which will be stable and one rom with which i can play with..........and more there will be no issue of restoring stock rom again nd again.....thnqqq devs....rock on.....jai mata di
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No need of dual boot kernel just backup ROMs it will backup kernel, ROM just restore .. I'm switching from stock to cm11 without any issue's
deccen90 said:
No need of dual boot kernel just backup ROMs it will backup kernel, ROM just restore .. I'm switching from stock to cm11 without any issue's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but backups from cwm are very huge like 800mb..........and can u tell me whats r the bugs in cm11...can i use it for daily purpose
kapish said:
but backups from cwm are very huge like 800mb..........and can u tell me whats r the bugs in cm11...can i use it for daily purpose
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's as stable as stock with sim2 data error ..agps fixed on upcoming release .. I'm using it as daily drive more battery backup on standby