Dear devs and community,
Now that the xperia z has been out for a while, you might all be aware that there is the famous distinction between xperia z's with
(a) the non-unlockable bootloader
(b) the unlockable bootloader
Now the advantages on the latter one are that you could install custom firmware and benefit from the work of the xda community. To date I am not aware that there is any method to unlock the non-unlockable bootloader in any manner. I would really like to know if we could really do something for that portion of z users that would like to benefit from their phones completely.
Unlocking the bootloader does void the warranty but to this day and age, it's like as if phones are leased to the user and it is ridiculous that s/he does not own the phone completely. So please do not post anything like "it cannot be done etc etc".
What we require is some pointers in order to start from somewhere in the hope of removing this plague completely off the xperia's with locked bootloader. Hopefully this would be a thread that provides insight to other z models on how to resolve this issue.
The bloatware on the phones is incredible! A quick look through adb shell will instantly tell you what I mean. The only way of being safe is not to have a data / wifi connection on the phone. That is why custom firmware is a far better choice than official firmware.
I hope that something could be done. Thank you in advance.
Al
Here's some threads that might provide you with a better insight into the problem:
[DEV] Reloading kernel without rebooting - http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-u/general/dev-reloading-kernel-rebooting-t2053466
[DEV][LB]ramdiskHijack - CM for locked bootloaders? - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2653896
[Bounty]Funding an xperia T/TL bootloader unlock - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2287897
[DEV] Kexec for locked bootloaders - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2648430
Other potentially helpful threads:
[dev][kernel][kexec] - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2495152
[PATCH][TX][DEV]kexec hardboot port - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2747215
None of them have succeded fully at loading a custom kernel on a non-unlockable device, or unlocking the device's bootloader.
An alternative would be hijacking ramdisk and loading a non-stock-based ROM on a stock kernel, as they did on the Xperia SP:
XperiaSP Locked Bootloader (LBL) Cyanogenmod 11.0 - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2735975
I've tried porting the solution they used on the Xperia SP, but I have nowhere near the amount of knowledge to get something like that working. Though, if some experienced dev would look into this solutions, maybe we would have some results
Even if Z's bootloader is unlockable, i think you can still flash custom roms with it. there are custom roms which support locked bootloaders, but of course they use stock kernel. hehe
Thing is we have to look further. There must be a solution. Nothing is impossible to this community. Thing is even as has been posted above. Only stock kernel can be flashed. Rooting is cumbersome as well which is mandatory on such a phone. At least as of the kitkat update u got to play about a lot to root it. Wondering why there was no rooting exploit lile cfroot for z out yet.
Rooting the z is simple, even on kk with locked boot loader - see here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2783863
Making permanently locked bootloader unlockable is a different story. The devs with the know how would have little incentive to pursue such a task. They would have bought z's with an unlockable bootloader, and unlocked it almost immediately.
Sent from my Xperia Z using xda premium
shoey63 said:
Rooting the z is simple, even on kk with locked boot loader - see here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2783863
Making permanently locked bootloader unlockable is a different story. The devs with the know how would have little incentive to pursue such a task. They would have bought z's with an unlockable bootloader, and unlocked it almost immediately.
Sent from my Xperia Z using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. I was hoping that the Xperia T bounty thread (I mentioned it above) would be of some motivation to devs, and help us fix the problem. But it seems that even 400$ wasn't a big enough motivation (or it's just impossible to do)
baga255 said:
True. I was hoping that the Xperia T bounty thread (I mentioned it above) would be of some motivation to devs, and help us fix the problem. But it seems that even 400$ wasn't a big enough motivation (or it's just impossible to do)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing is impossible for this community. There are many people out there who could not buy an unlockable z and hopefully we could make such hardware more usable.
Sent from my C6603 using XDA Free mobile app
Alcatrazx said:
Nothing is impossible for this community. There are many people out there who could not buy an unlockable z and hopefully we could make such hardware more usable.
Sent from my C6603 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NOTHING is 100% IMPOSSIBLE anywhere. The creator of the universe COULD be a flying spaghetti monster, and Santa Claus MIGHT be real. LOL.
But some things are just VERY improbable.
Never mind sacharine images of "community". What we have is LOTS of people who want things but can't do them themselves, and relatively few people who can actually do those things.
A company developed an unlock for One M8 and NOBODY else can figure it out. They bricked FIVE M8's getting it working. They charge $20 and get LOTS of grief from people whining that it should be cheaper, or free.
BL locks these days are often VERY hard to crack. Each time crackers attacked in the last few years, the OEMs got smarter and put in more safeguards. Gone are the days when ANYTHING could be unlocked.
In the grand scheme of things, $400 is almost nothing to a high caliber cracker, and pledges are often MUCH bigger than real life payouts. A good SW engineer can make $100k per year in the first world, $400 might pay for 4 hours, once all sorts of common sense deductions are made.
I made SURE to buy my Z, Z1 and Z2 tab from non-carrier sources that leave BL unlockable. Others should do the same, or at least learn for next phone.
Remember the time...!
Guys,
I owned a Xperia x8 ho, this old phone has its glory, rip x8...
I tought there was an unnoficial way to unlock it's BL, by the Windows console,
Why not look in there and see if something can be done for the Z?
With the x8 we only had to verify the volttage/date (correct me if I'm wrong)
to see if the exploit was possible, why not try to do the same on the Z?
X10 Bypass > X8 Idea > http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1018652
X8 Bypass Idea > http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1042018
General Research on the x8 forum > http://forum.xda-developers.com/search.php?searchid=304696191
I can't find back the original thread but I can assure you that my X8 is UB unfortunately it dates:S
I think our best bet is to try and get CM (or AOSP/PA) working on a locked bootloader, using the ramdisk hijack method. It's been done before on the Xperia SP (and open-sourced), so I think it should be possible for the Xperia Z too (just my personal opinion, I'm in no way sure that that would actually work but considering the similarities of Sony products, it might be highly possible).
I'm just too unexperienced to do it myself atm, but I'll still try when I find the time.
This should be of interest.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk
Any news on this? Any dev willing to give this a shot?
Sent from my eXposed C6603
Related
Without an unlocked boot loader, which would allow for a custom kernel, we will never see substantial development on the Atrix.
Lack of (the ability to run) custom kernels prevents many of the modifications that have made Cyanogenmod and other popular ROMs appealing. (including overclocking, enhanced power management and screen color adjustments just to name a few)
The best we could hope for (without an unlocked bootloader) would be a stock version of android, devoid of all things Blur.
Luckily the latter will happen sooner rather than later, imo.
Like some other posters said, we still have hope. There are three main sources of unlocking the bootloader, I will list them here in the order I feel they are likely to actually happen chronologically:
1. Information gleaned from the LG Optimus 2X will directly translate into an unlocked bootloader on the Atrix:
If unconfirmed rumors are to be believed, the LG Optimus 2X, which runs the same Tegra 2 SOC (system on chip) as the Atrix, has already had its bootloader unlocked. With a European March release eminent (its only available in South Korea currently) it could only be a small matter of time before the same methods used to unlock the 2X fall into our hands.
2. Out of the box thinking by Developers leads to exploiting the bootloader:
Inquisitive and risky developers here at XDA have been laying waste to bootloaders and the like for years now. The Tegra 2 System On a Chip Platform is still very much in its infancy, it stands to reason that there are quite a few vulnerabilities hiding just under the surface awaiting the prodding minds of credit hungry devs.
3. Motorola makes good on their "promise" and gives us the keys to the castle:
Motorola has alluded to the possibility of releasing their secure grasp on our most prised dual core phone. Rest assured it won't literally be "keys" they give us, and more likely they will provide a flashable development bootloader accessible as a download to registered developers.
What method do you think will happen, first?
I think we may learn something from the Optimus 2X.
im feeling pessimistic about this. im not thinking its going to get cracked. hope im wrong though
The Devs always win, why would Moto release the software? Because they feel like it? Sorry they are worried about one thing and that is the bottom line, they wont do anything to help a small portion of their customer base.
You need to have an option for "DG will figure it out"
if anything we'd learn we should learn that from the XOOM, no ?
LG use the tegra 2 and all, but different company do ( lock ) things differently
oFUNGUSo said:
im feeling pessimistic about this. im not thinking its going to get cracked. hope im wrong though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately I'm in line with you. It doesn't seem like there's any motivation for Motorola to release the keys, and from past history with their devices cracking the bootloader does not look promising.
It's a shame because this is a very good phone that just needs a little tweaking (removing Blur).
There has to be some way without the keys.. I don't know what, but it can't require just those. We need to get other developers to look at the Atrix. Like I said in the other thread, jimmydafish and maybe even koush could help DG try to find some way to bring ROMs. Even if they don't fully unlock it, just do it similar to the droid x.
Atrix4G Rooted!
the poll results speak truth.
*sad face*
its dumb too because i returned my craptivate to get this phone, and now i wont be able to do all the same cool stuff to it.
i guess i have 20 more days where i could return this and either go to the crappy again, or inspire. im juggling the idea, but the dual core, large ram and good battery life are making me lean towards just keeping this phone.....oh and the fact taht the GPS works when the crappy didnt
oFUNGUSo said:
the poll results speak truth.
*sad face*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sir are no economist!
But seriously... if you look at the results, an overwhelming majority believe that we will in one way or another obtain an unlocked bootloader:
66.18% of all voters think it will happen, while only 33.82 think it never will.
Have faith in the DEVs, I'm voting on option 2!
it won't be cracked, it's almost impossible, but the droid x wasn't doomed because it still has greats rom. No unlocked bootloader only means no custom kernels, not roms.
i would like those 100+ people that signed the petition about at&t's block of hsupa instead post on motorola's twitter accounts all day. the only way we MAY get an unlocked bootloader would be for moto to do it.
jruweaver said:
Have faith in the DEVs, I'm voting on option 2!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what if one of those DEVs is the ony who actually told me, and i quote:
"it wont get cracked"
oFUNGUSo said:
what if one of those DEVs is the ony who actually told me, and i quote:
"it wont get cracked"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess it depends on which dev said it.
Designgears told me more than once, and everyone else in the IRC channel that we more than likely will not be able to unlock it. Never said it was impossible, but the thing that checks the kernel and recovery, whatever it is, is lower than the bootloader, that is why the bootloader is only signed.
Out of curiosity is it possible at all to OC without cracking the boot loader and loading a new kernel? I'm pretty sure it's not but just double checking.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
DemonWav said:
Designgears told me more than once, and everyone else in the IRC channel that we more than likely will not be able to unlock it. Never said it was impossible, but the thing that checks the kernel and recovery, whatever it is, is lower than the bootloader, that is why the bootloader is only signed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohhh boy.. That does not sound good at all What to do, what to do?
Give up. It's tilting windmills without a leak from within moto.
I think you mean tilting at windmills, in reference to Don Quixote tilting his lance at a windmill thinking it was an enemy.
All literary references aside, even with a "leak from within moto" the chances of unlocking the bootloader are negligible.
We had all of the documentation and files from Motorola for the Droid devices including efuse implementation and emulation on unsecured hardware, all of component files themselves for both secured and unsecured hardware and all of the firmware builds.
None of it helped unlock the bootloader. We even have the methods and tools for setting and blowing the fuses with RadioComm.
It is irrevocable once set and we have been told that Motorola themselves cannot "unlock" them. All they can do is replace the chip with an unsecured one.
Love my Z1 so far but..
Wondering about 3 things at the moment,
1. Will Sony ever fix the camera issue for the bootloader?
2. If so, Will there be a great amount of ROM development like for example the Galaxy series.
3. Are we gonna see some nice updates from Sony in the near future? ( Camera fix, 4.3/4.4?)
zippy1990 said:
Love my Z1 so far but..
Wondering about 3 things at the moment,
1. Will Sony ever fix the camera issue for the bootloader?
2. If so, Will there be a great amount of ROM development like for example the Galaxy series.
3. Are we gonna see some nice updates from Sony in the near future? ( Camera fix, 4.3/4.4?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sony will definitely sort the camera issue out with regards to the bootloader.
We have two fantastic devs already, krabappel2548 & DooMLoRD, more will come if they think the Z1 is worth developing for.
Updates will come when and where Sony sees fit to release them but we all hope for 4.4
Sent from my C6903 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I only miss lack of working recovery for 534!
I have unlocked bootloader of my old Z and after some time it brick's (nothing to do with unlocking) fortunately they exchanged it under warranty, but now i prefer not to unlock bootloader and only root (which is must!). Original ROM is very good
I'm really not missing having custom rom's because after rooting I'm using Xposed - have about 25 modules installed and my phone may as well have a custom rom on it because all the features I usually look for are there! With "Auto Hide Soft Keys" installed I've got the full screen size back and I'm really very very happy overall.
Normally I'd have installed a 'slim' or 'AOSP' type rom just for speed reasons, but the damn Snapdragon 800 is so fast it really doesn't matter that Sony preloaded a little bit of bloatware - and its not as pervasive & space consuming as Samsungs bloat.
The only features I'm missing are the kernel level features (Touch-to-wake please DooMLoRD!), but there's only one custom kernel for now and it requires a UB, so I'm waiting on that till they fix the TA partition stuff (though I know you can just restore the TA partition to fix the camera I don't feel the need to yet).
And to answer the questions:
1) Yes
2) Wait and see
3) Yes or they'll be abandoning their flagship phone to word of mouth and stale OS - not going to happen.
Uvaavu said:
3) Yes or they'll be abandoning their flagship phone to word of mouth and stale OS - not going to happen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sony and S/E HAVE done this before, look at the history...
Here is my answers to the 3 questions:
1. Proberbly not, it is a way to keep people from custom roms.
This way Sony can still claim "open bootloader" and "dev friendly", but Sony have done it this way for a reason...
2. Wait and see...
Without sources, the camera will proberbly not ever work on custom roms...
The way this phone is made, sony can in fact release sources as they have to, and leave out the sources for the camera...
3. Look at the Sony and S/E history... Android v4.3 is most certainly all you can expect, as they have to release 4.3 to meet Googles demands...
You will get bugfixes thoug...
I would have written "Sony is NOT stupid!" in the end of all 3 answers, but that looked a little angry...
- the fact is that Sony have NEVER done anything by mistake...!
Could someone please explain the consequences of having a locked BL? Especially wrt to the Moto X? Also, what is this SS that everyone keeps talking about?
TIA
I've been in your situation before and couldn't find help or answers, phone makers sign there software with a signature when it boots so when the phone loads it looks for that signature and won't load unless the os had that signature. When your boatloader is locked it means you can't install custom roms or fully root your phone, people have to find an exploit to root it, like case's rockmymoto exploit. SS is safe strap and it is a workaround for installing custom roms on a locked boatloader phone.
Sent from my XT1055 using xda app-developers app
charlie-n said:
I've been in your situation before and couldn't find help or answers, phone makers sign there software with a signature when it boots so when the phone loads it looks for that signature and won't load unless the os had that signature. When your boatloader is locked it means you can't install custom roms or fully root your phone, people have to find an exploit to root it, like case's rockmymoto exploit. SS is safe strap and it is a workaround for installing custom roms on a locked boatloader phone.
Sent from my XT1055 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So basically then, something like the AT&T moto x can be rooted by using the rockmymoto exploit, but custom ROMs have to be made specifically to support SS?
Seeing as how I dont think development for the Moto X isnt going to take off on a major scale (like, say the Nexus), it would make no difference having a locked or unlocked BL, am I right?
anirudh412 said:
So basically then, something like the AT&T moto x can be rooted by using the rockmymoto exploit, but custom ROMs have to be made specifically to support SS?
Seeing as how I dont think development for the Moto X isnt going to take off on a major scale (like, say the Nexus), it would make no difference having a locked or unlocked BL, am I right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well there are several roms out there for unlocked BL currently. The reason to have a unlocked BL: if you want to flash roms a lot, if you want to make sure that you always can have root (sometimes exploits for a FW won't come out), and if you want complete control over your phone.
Much less dev will be done for SS roms because people are finding it difficult to build them I believe. I only use SS to keep root and take newer otas, or run roms like eclipse that are based off of stock FW, then just trimmed down with added features and lots more.
If you have the money, having an unlocked BL is nice because you don't need exploits for roots and other things. I would go with one if money wasn't an issue purely for that fact. Not sure how they are getting OTAs right now, but sometimes unlocked BLs also get OTAs quicker than locked BLs. And they can always flash the OTA if there is a leak. You can also always downgrade your device to a different FW if you want with an unlocked BL.
jayboyyyy said:
well there are several roms out there for unlocked BL currently. The reason to have a unlocked BL: if you want to flash roms a lot, if you want to make sure that you always can have root (sometimes exploits for a FW won't come out), and if you want complete control over your phone.
Much less dev will be done for SS roms because people are finding it difficult to build them I believe. I only use SS to keep root and take newer otas, or run roms like eclipse that are based off of stock FW, then just trimmed down with added features and lots more.
If you have the money, having an unlocked BL is nice because you don't need exploits for roots and other things. I would go with one if money wasn't an issue purely for that fact. Not sure how they are getting OTAs right now, but sometimes unlocked BLs also get OTAs quicker than locked BLs. And they can always flash the OTA if there is a leak. You can also always downgrade your device to a different FW if you want with an unlocked BL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Money isnt the issue here. The thing is the Moto X isnt available in my country, but someone is selling their AT&T moto on local ebay. I jumped ship from using android for so many years to an iPhone 5 (my current phone) because I just wanted a phone I could use. Kinda grew tired of flashing ROMS and kernels all the time. The Moto X hits the sweet spot with the perfect size and stutter free operation. To me, this is the perfect android phone. All I need is root and a custom launcher. That is available for the AT&T phones I believe? And as you said, ECLIPSE is available for me to flash if I feel like.
Other than that, apps like lightflow and others dont differentiate b/w locked and unlocked BLs, do they?
anirudh412 said:
Could someone please explain the consequences of having a locked BL? Especially wrt to the Moto X? Also, what is this SS that everyone keeps talking about?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Straight from the man himself in regards to SafeStrap.
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/104161-recovery-locked-safestrap-recovery-v365-2013-11-13/
Any locked BL users care to give their 0.02 about life with a locked BL? :silly:
anirudh412 said:
Money isnt the issue here. The thing is the Moto X isnt available in my country, but someone is selling their AT&T moto on local ebay. I jumped ship from using android for so many years to an iPhone 5 (my current phone) because I just wanted a phone I could use. Kinda grew tired of flashing ROMS and kernels all the time. The Moto X hits the sweet spot with the perfect size and stutter free operation. To me, this is the perfect android phone. All I need is root and a custom launcher. That is available for the AT&T phones I believe? And as you said, ECLIPSE is available for me to flash if I feel like.
Other than that, apps like lightflow and others dont differentiate b/w locked and unlocked BLs, do they?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
before you pull the trigger make sure the phone will work in your area. IDK about all of the other country phone stuff, but I have seen people posting about what lte bands and radios each different model of the moto x can support. Also, some models you can flash other carriers FW on them, some you can't. And if you buy some models with for some carriers, you can unlock the BL then move it to ATT or whatever service you are using. Like i said, IDK about all of that so that will take some reading and investigating on your part.
I also don't know about lightflow, but basically once you have root, all rooted apps should be able to do what they do. I personally know of nothing that requires an unlocked BL to work (besides flashing roms, kernals, radios, or other stuff). Just root. I'm assuming lightflow is like any other app that requires root. Don't believe any app should ever be changing anything to your bootloader (besides exploits that come in the form of an app).
Im on a lock BL fyi. Had the money for the dev but once root came out for the phone, I decided to go with subsidized. All I wanted was root. And it seems kitkat will have a root exploit made by jcase so im not worried about the future either.
jayboyyyy said:
before you pull the trigger make sure the phone will work in your area. IDK about all of the other country phone stuff, but I have seen people posting about what lte bands and radios each different model of the moto x can support. Also, some models you can flash other carriers FW on them, some you can't. And if you buy some models with for some carriers, you can unlock the BL then move it to ATT or whatever service you are using. Like i said, IDK about all of that so that will take some reading and investigating on your part.
I also don't know about lightflow, but basically once you have root, all rooted apps should be able to do what they do. I personally know of nothing that requires an unlocked BL to work (besides flashing roms, kernals, radios, or other stuff). Just root. I'm assuming lightflow is like any other app that requires root. Don't believe any app should ever be changing anything to your bootloader (besides exploits that come in the form of an app).
I'm on a lock BL fyi. Had the money for the dev but once root came out for the phone, I decided to go with subsidized. All I wanted was root. And it seems kitkat will have a root exploit made by jcase so im not worried about the future either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, it just occurred to me I wouldn't need lightflow on the MotoX, it doesn't have a notification light
Either way, even if I do have an unlocked BL, flashing AOSP is out of the question as I wouldnt want to miss out on Active Notifs and always listening G Now. Stock ROM with a few tweaks is all I need.
Under ideal situations (read global release of perhaps the best android phone to date), I wouldn't be in this predicament.
jayboyyyy said:
Im on a lock BL fyi. Had the money for the dev but once root came out for the phone, I decided to go with subsidized. All I wanted was root. And it seems kitkat will have a root exploit made by jcase so im not worried about the future either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May I take the liberty of asking which phones have you used before? I have read a few threads and the general consensus is that this phone is smoother than the 'so-called' flagships like the GS4 and the One. Would you happen to agree? As I said before, I just need a phone that works without lag. I am not a heavy user by any means. Texting, whatsapp and a few occasional games like the Clash of Clans. The GPU is quite capable from what I have heard
anirudh412 said:
May I take the liberty of asking which phones have you used before? I have read a few threads and the general consensus is that this phone is smoother than the 'so-called' flagships like the GS4 and the One. Would you happen to agree? As I said before, I just need a phone that works without lag. I am not a heavy user by any means. Texting, whatsapp and a few occasional games like the Clash of Clans. The GPU is quite capable from what I have heard
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya the phone is just as quick if not quicker than those flagship phones. while its hardware is not "superior" the code behind everything and the processors set up how they are make it just as snappy as those other phones. I never owned either of the two you described but I have played with them all for enough time. You won't be disappointed with the phone at all. A lot of people think it is the best android phone generally that has been released. I;'m in that boat. Closes equivalent to an apple product (flow , feel, etc) that I have used. Those other phones are great as well. Id go htc one over sg4. I was about to buy those phones but then held out to see when/if the moto x was going to be released. Glad I did. went with this phone over those. The size of the phone is perfect for me. I don't like huge screens that barely fit in my pcoket. Battery life is solid (i dont use this things for 6 hours a day like others, not sure how they generate an income ha). the features are amazing and change how you use your phone. Truely the first phone I have seen that released some cool features that were extremely useful and not just eye candy. Google backing moto is a big plus too, you know that if anyone is going to get good treatment, it will at least have to be moto. take the plunge, no chance you will regret it.
jayboyyyy said:
ya the phone is just as quick if not quicker than those flagship phones. while its hardware is not "superior" the code behind everything and the processors set up how they are make it just as snappy as those other phones. I never owned either of the two you described but I have played with them all for enough time. You won't be disappointed with the phone at all. A lot of people think it is the best android phone generally that has been released. I;'m in that boat. Closes equivalent to an apple product (flow , feel, etc) that I have used. Those other phones are great as well. Id go htc one over sg4. I was about to buy those phones but then held out to see when/if the moto x was going to be released. Glad I did. went with this phone over those. The size of the phone is perfect for me. I don't like huge screens that barely fit in my pcoket. Battery life is solid (i dont use this things for 6 hours a day like others, not sure how they generate an income ha). the features are amazing and change how you use your phone. Truely the first phone I have seen that released some cool features that were extremely useful and not just eye candy. Google backing moto is a big plus too, you know that if anyone is going to get good treatment, it will at least have to be moto. take the plunge, no chance you will regret it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you so much for taking the time to help me out. Moto X, here I come :highfive:
Sooo I'm starting to get really annoyed about this so called "high end" phone now. And as a consumer beeing the testpilot of new software.
Word to Sony, do not implement new software until it really works.
Well I relocked bootloader because my camera caused freeze or reboots from time to time. I ran the repair from Sony update.
Voila! Now the touchscreen behaves weird from time to time. And the viewing angles has bothered me from start.
My old Xperia V is outperforming this atm. What's up with this, it's always like this when major updates arrive I've noticed.
Sent from my C6903 using xda app-developers app
Probably have nothing to do with it, but just for my personal curiosity, did you Restored TA?
EDIT: Now I remember, you did not. My Bad...sorry...
Nope I didn't back my TA up. All the services seems to work anyway I noticed.
Didn't think Sony update would allow me to to do a repair since I thought it was based on the DRM keys. Funny enough some services that wasn't there before suddenly are there aswell.
But it seems to have changed so that my screen acts weird and it sometimes crash applications. The camera have worked good so far wit better pictures aswell. I will test it abit more during the day.
Sent from my C6903 using xda app-developers app
Sorry to say this, but you cannot blame sony for a phone that is not functioning correctly when you have unlocked the bootloader.
They quite clearly say this
http://prntscr.com/3eh5ze
and that is taken from thier official page about unlocking the bootloader http://unlockbootloader.sonymobile.com/
I know this does not help, but this is not the place to vent frustrations when you have modified the software they implemented on the device they sold you and then complain that the this causes bad performance.
Every one of us here should realise that this is a developers site and that modifications and customisations to a fully stock firmware are done at our risk and come with no guarantee of improve performance.
Also, there is no guarantee of reverting back...
we take as part of the risk of helping developers. There are extremely few finalised products on this site, 99% are works in progress.
although.
gregbradley said:
Sorry to say this, but you cannot blame sony for a phone that is not functioning correctly when you have unlocked the bootloader.
They quite clearly say this
http://prntscr.com/3eh5ze
and that is taken from thier official page about unlocking the bootloader http://unlockbootloader.sonymobile.com/
I know this does not help, but this is not the place to vent frustrations when you have modified the software they implemented on the device they sold you and then complain that the this causes bad performance.
Every one of us here should realise that this is a developers site and that modifications and customisations to a fully stock firmware are done at our risk and come with no guarantee of improve performance.
Also, there is no guarantee of reverting back...
we take as part of the risk of helping developers. There are extremely few finalised products on this site, 99% are works in progress.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although, there are others having issues with the display as far as ive read. And most of them are on stock firmware with locked bootloader.
The hardware itself should work in any case if you are on stock software with or without the DRM keys. And tbh, in latest software it seems to me that the DRM aint used at all. If a DRM key would be required, that entire serivce wouldnt be avaialbe at all. Also, the Sony Update repair wouldnt update/repair the phone if it was based on DRM keys. The Sony Update does not work if i have my bootloader unlocked. But as said, relocking it again with flashtool makes it work just like it is supposed to. And this tells me that DRM keys are not beeing used since they are put there so that you can use "special" services that Sony wants you to use on stock phone. And theese services are started and working without the DRM keys. Even the warranty is valid after a unlocked bootloader after i spoke to a person at Sony, since they would accept my phone to check under warranty. And it says like this from what ive read "unlocking the bootloader MAY void your warranty".
So the problems i have or have had are problems that even ppl who never "fiddled" with their software or bootloader also have. Atleast thats what ive found when i did a quick search for it on google. And the problems were there even before KitKat. Stock software is always stock software.
Sorry for venting my frustration but the support forum at Sony are just filled with standard answers. At this place there are actually developers and i belive that information from this forum actually reach the developers at Sony faster.
Anyone know when the .761 will be released officially btw ? Im hoping a bug fix will arrive soon to fix the problems that ppl are having. If that doesent work i will send my unit to sony for service. If no one wants to buy it from me before
hmm... i know the repair function of update service still work even u relock your bootloader without TA
and the screen strange behavior is common on z1
did u put ur z1 into water?? if u did dont worry, it may recover itself in few days (once a time, after i put into water, the screen behave strange for few days. it went back to normal soon though)
No I didn't expose it to water. It started after I did the repair with Sony update. But "knock on wood", I haven't had any issues yet today. Not even camera has restarted the phone yet.
I however received the wrong kind of screenprotector. I will change it to what I've used on all other phones wich has worked great. Although it worked perfectly with rooted phone and other software so don't think that's the problem.
Sent from my C6903 using xda app-developers app
Hey there.
I'm new to the Xperia scene, before I had various Samsung devices since the S1.
This means I'm pretty spoiled. The first thing I usually did on my S devices was rooting and installing CyanogenmodLineageOS, and it always worked flawlessly.
Now coming to the Xperia devices, what will the problems be that I'll face?
From what I've seen in the guides section, unlocking, rooting and TWRP is possible and already available, but there are some caveats with unlocking (loosing some proprietary features).
Second, what are the chances of getting LOS for this device?
im also new here and this finally looks like my kind of smartphone. Its small, premium and has pretty damn good features including a headphone jack! Currently on a OnePlus 5 and its.... okay? They really cheaped out on lots of things to make the stupid camera better which it still kinda sucks. Especially the glass on the front.... ive got scratches galore and it sits in my left pocket ALONE CONSTANTLY. the fact that it has any scratches is bullsh**.
Enough ranting, I'd love for this thread to get more attention! I just really want to know what this thing will cost. hopefully under 500.... or even less than that. Its a tiny phone cmon price tag.... wondering how this battery will do and what kind of dev support it will be getting! definitely will check up whenever this thing comes out
Where do you see the root is available? There is only a bounty thread to someone find a rooting method. And I think due to Android 8 and it's new features it will be not easy.
So for now accept the Sony stock ROM, Sony makes pretty clean ROMs so it should be a joy for you to use something new
About loosing some functionality (like Sony DRMem photo processing, Track ID license etc.), on previous Xperias you loose these functions only when you're unlocking the bootloader. If there is a rooting method with locked bootloader then you loose nothing (for example on Z3 Compact).
Davka said:
Where do you see the root is available? There is only a bounty thread to someone find a rooting method. And I think due to Android 8 and it's new features it will be not easy.
So for now accept the Sony stock ROM, Sony makes pretty clean ROMs so it should be a joy for you to use something new
About loosing some functionality (like Sony DRMem photo processing, Track ID license etc.), on previous Xperias you loose these functions only when you're unlocking the bootloader. If there is a rooting method with locked bootloader then you loose nothing (for example on Z3 Compact).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With Root, I was referring to the "All Things XPERIA" thread, and to unlocking the bootloader.
Should be no problem to achieve root like that, however then there's the DRM-stuff...
The ROM itself is fine, but I tend to rely on some things like Titanium Backup and Tasker.
Guess the Xperia line isn't the best choice for me after all.
Shame cause I already preordered ;D
4rz0 said:
With Root, I was referring to the "All Things XPERIA" thread, and to unlocking the bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bare in mind that is a general reference for previous devices and until XPERIA devs get devices with Oreo then it's going to be a waiting game.